Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, August 06, 2015

Klevius compassionate helping hand to PM Cameron's failed search for a compassionate social alternative to the egoistic, parasitic and heartless social state


PM Cameron's failed affairs with "diversity" women

Sayeeda Warsi

is an unelected Peer  who in 2007 was appointed Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion by David Cameron. Enabling her to fulfil this post, she was created a Life Peer as Baroness Warsi, of Dewsbury in the County of West Yorkshire.

The muslim connection














The social connection


Camilla Batmanghelidjh

"mesmerized" David Cameron to support her children's "charity".

On 30 July 2015 the Metropolitan Police announced an investigation into the charity saying, “The Metropolitan police service has today commenced an investigation into a number of allegations of crime involving a children’s charity. “The investigation is being led by officers from the complex case team of the sexual offences, exploitation and child abuse command.

 In 2012 when he was Children's and Families Minister working within the Department of Education, Tim Loughton MP signed off what was the second largest grant he ever agreed. When the charity came back for additional funds, Loughton and officials in the Department for Education advised central government and No.10 Downing Street against paying the grant, because "we needed to see what the actual results are." Despite the Ministers caution, further funds and grants were authorised and sent to the charity. In August 2015 it was alleged that UK Prime Minister David Cameron had paid insufficient attention to these concerns, raised in 2012.

In 2015 an investigation by BBC Newsnight and the website BuzzFeed found that the British government suspended £3 million in funding for Kids Company until Batmanghelidjh was removed from her position as chief executive, citing concerns over the governance of the charity. In March 2015 the interim finance director, head of human resources and director of development resigned, which the charity explained as due to uncertainty of funding. On 3 July 2015 it was reported that Batmanghelidjh was to step down as chief executive and continue in a "presidential" role. The government indicated that it would end £5 million of annual funding.

With the charity then stating that it was in financial difficulty, and seeking £3million grant to assist in restructuring, Richard Heaton, the Cabinet Office Permanent Secretary, wrote to ministers Oliver Letwin and Matthew Hancock seeking a Ministerial direction, because although he recognised the good work of the charity, he was concerned the grant “does not represent value for money, in terms of delivering the outcomes for which the department is funded by parliament”. The ministers said in their reply that they believed he should go ahead with the grant, because they judged the charity to have a “realistic prospect of long-term viability so it can continue to deliver for vulnerable young people”.

Shortly after payment of the grant to the charity, the Government sought to recover the money on the ground that Kids Company had breached the terms of the grant; specifically, that some of the grant had been used to pay staff salaries. Batmanghelidjh denied that this had breached the terms of the grant. She also claimed that the government grant was to have been matched by a private donation of £3 million. However, when the donor became aware of the police investigation into sexual abuse allegations at Kids Company, the private donation pledge was withdrawn as well. As a result, on 5 August 2015 the charity told the government that it would close its services on the same day.


Klevius comment: Cameron chose a female muslim who he thought was "moderate" for the sake of being both "diverse" as well as welcoming women in his Conservative party. What little he knew about islam back then (Klevius criticized him about it already in 2007). Klevius has full understanding of Cameron's strive away from the social state. However, what he missed was that Kids Company was nothing else than a micro copy of the socialist social state. Every such type of effort, no matter how financed, will end up in personal egoism. However, unlike private companies there is no real quality guarantee whip behind it. The "work" is usually self centered and the results are mostly blurred under a cover of populist psycho state jargon.

 Klevius will come out with a solution to PM Cameron's dilemma, but before that please educate yourself by reading the two most important papers on the topic of the social state and vulnerable children.

Pathological Symbiosis

Angels of Antichrist

The social state is much more devastating to children than any private company - and waste much more money!


A UK mother who found 125 names of potential (most/all muslims?) sex abusers on her daughter’s mobile phone claims she was told by police in Rotherham it would be a "breach of the girl’s human rights" if they investigated.

Klevius translation: Note that we are talking about underage girls who would have no Human Rights protection against social state interventions (aided by the police) whatsoever (to understand this and the tiltle see Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis). What they really meant was that it would be a breach of the muslims' human rights (read "diversity policy") if they investigated. And this is the dilemma - Human Rights cover all, including muslims, whereas sharia opposes Human Rights - which fact doesn't hinder muslims (and their supporters) from abusing Human Rights when it serves themselves.!

The parasitic social state that feeds itself on behalf of the taxpayers and children while giving a s--t to non-muslim girls abused by muslims. Don't approve a penny before getting rid of the parasites residing in the social state! And one thing is definitive: Ed Milliband will continue supporting these parasites.

Rotherham has been totally dominated by Labour since World War 2. Compare the total dominance of the Swedish social democrats who created the disastrous Swedish social state all the way from Gunnar and Alva Myral's "social hygiene"  in the 1930s and due eugenics to the explosive tax injection in the 1970s and due birth of the modern social state. Some results: The Swedish "girl problem" (which Klevius has written about since 1993), high child/youth criminality, and a school system that 2015 is classified among the worst within OECD and heavily criticized in a recent OECD report. Yet Sweden has compulsory school attendance and doesn't admit homeschooling at all for normal children (alone in Europe together with Germany whose Hitler imposed law is still in power).

Learn more on Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis


Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending children.

.
















.

No comments: