Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, March 16, 2018

Saudi Hitler* is the problem and Iran the solution

* However, unlike Hitler, the Saudi dictator has political cowards traitors "allies" all over the world. And these "politicians" are almost never supported by the majority of the people on this particular bug in democracy.

Arabic language, "the holy places", OIC's anti-Human Rights sharia, and the threat from Palestine/Iran, constitute the components of the problem - and solution.

If the text seems too graphic and "offensive" for you, do remind yourself that Klevius is here talking about a muslim theocracy dictatorship "country" where Human Rights and Atheism (i.e. not to believe in a 'god" made up for defending racism and sexism) are heavily criminalized. And then take a look in your mirror!

Of course, the basic problem is with islam itself and its incompatibility with Human Rights (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights - deceptively called "islamic human rights") due to islam's "prophetic" ties to its evil past (the world's worst slave rader/traider ever).

However, islam is nothing if not connected to its context. And the irrefutable fact is that the combination of 1) oil wealth 2) custodianship of islam 3) custodianship of OIC (the muslim world sharia Umma/nation*) 4) islam as a language imperialist Arabic "religion", puts the islamofascist oil rich Saudi dictator family** in the center of islam's evilness today. With disastrous consequences not only in Yemen and Syria but all over the world through Saudi induced Sunni/Salafist islamic hate mongering. Even Theresa May had to escape one of those Saudi steered street attacks.

* Muslims can never be classified as "a minority" because their Umma doesn't accept any borders, hence making muslims the biggest nationalist supremacist party.

** Have you noticed that the muslim islamofascist members of the Saudi dictator family are rarely called what they are by BBC -  namely just 'muslims'. Is it "offensive" against muslims

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family fully utilizes the situation that the "islamophobia" campaign they themselves have sponsored, now offers them, i.e. to spread their evil influence and power hunger all over the Arab world and beyond. Hitler used the German language as his excuse...

The solution

Stop immediately the support of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family, and treat them at least equally hostile as you treat Russia, Iran etc. And although Iran is always a lesser islamic evil and threat due to it not being an Arabic majority country, the majority of its people are just longing for getting rid of islam and returning to its Persian roots. Roots that the Saudis lack completely. The only roots (except the evil islamic ones) the Saudis have are the ones they got from the "British" gardener less than 100 years ago. And as most people do well without sticking to some evil roots, Klevius thinks the young Saudis could do as well if they were allowed to.

A treaty with Iran that is combined with the stopping of the Saudi war mongering (and oppression of Shia muslims) against Iran, and which includes a safety guarantee for Israel, would be the best solution for not only Mideast but for the world. And the Iranian people would surely take care of their Ayatollahs - and without replacing them with Saudi steered substitutes.

The islamofascist muslim war criminal and Saudi dictator "prince", Mohammad Salman's desecration of the Queen, ordered by Theresa May against the will of the people.

Some voices about Saudi war crimes from the web:

Jeremy Corbyn has accused the government of colluding in war crimes committed by Saudi forces in Yemen in an intervention which prompted a furious response from Downing Street.

As Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi crown prince, began a three-day visit to the UK, the Labour leader used prime minister’s questions to attack Theresa May for co-operating with the regime, claiming British forces personnel were “directing” the conflict in Yemen. Downing Street reacted angrily, saying Mr Corbyn’s allegation was “simply not true”.

End the US Enabling of Saudi War Crimes in Yemen

Zaid Jilani reports that the U.S. military has no idea what missions are carried out in Yemen by the coalition planes that they refuel:

In a surprising admission on Tuesday, the head of U.S. Central Command – which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East and Central Asia – admitted that the Pentagon doesn’t know a whole lot about the Saudi airstrikes in Yemen that the United States is supporting through intelligence, munitions, and refueling.

U.S. CENTCOM Cmdr. Gen. Joseph Votel made the admission in response to questions from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., during a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“General Votel, does CENTCOM track the purpose of the missions it is refueling? In other words, where a U.S.-refueled aircraft is going, what targets it strikes, and the result of the mission?” Warren asked.

“Senator, we do not,” Votel replied.

If the U.S. military doesn’t track what the coalition planes do after they are refueled, it can’t honestly claim that it isn’t aiding and abetting coalition violations of international law. They don’t know what the coalition planes they refuel do later on, and perhaps they don’t want to know. If the U.S. isn’t tracking how our assistance is used, it isn’t credible to say that our government is using that assistance to change the coalition’s conduct of the war for the better. The U.S. is blindly enabling indiscriminate coalition bombing without making any effort to understand the effects of our support.

Gen. Votel also stated that the U.S. is not a party to the conflict. This is the lie that U.S. officials have been hiding behind for the last three years. When our military refuels planes that go on to bomb targets in another country, our military has joined that war on the side of the governments it is aiding. That should be an uncontroversial statement of fact, but supporters of U.S. involvement in the war are desperate to deny it. If the U.S. weren’t a party to the conflict, there would be no need to debate the extensive assistance that the U.S. provides to the governments wrecking and starving Yemen for the last three years.

U.S. support has been essential to the Saudi-led war, and it would be much harder for the Saudis and their allies to continue waging that war without our military assistance. That is why those in favor of continuing the war don’t want to cut off that support. They wish to keep the war going, but they want to dodge the responsibility our government has for aiding and abetting the coalition’s crimes. Americans that want to end U.S. involvement and help bring an end to the war on Yemen should urge their senators to vote for S.J.Res. 54.

The Senate is expected to debate a war powers resolution next week that calls for the United States to end its involvement in the Yemen conflict, but a top Senate Republican leader signaled Thursday GOP leaders would prefer to put off a final vote on the divisive issue until after it can be more closely studied in committee.
"I think it would be better for the committee to consider it and make a recommendation after having a hearing so everybody understands exactly what the consequences are," said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 GOP leader in the chamber, referring to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
The US has provided military support -- including intelligence sharing, logistical support, and mid-flight refueling -- to a coalition led by Saudi Arabia against Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen. The conflict, which is considered, in part, a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran as they struggle for dominance in the region, has created a dire humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

Three senators -- Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, and Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut -- authored the privileged resolution and are working to force a vote on it. They believe the refueling and other actions by the US armed forces are akin to "boots on the ground" and that Congress needs to authorize it.
They described their bill as the "first-ever vote in the Senate to withdraw US armed forces from an unauthorized war."

She's only 12, but her father is already planning her wedding

"For too long, and under both parties, Congress has abdicated it responsibility to provide authorization for the use of military force," the three senators wrote recently in a letter to bipartisan Senate leaders. "Regardless of what one thinks of our involvement in Yemen, as we enter a fourth year of helping the Saudis prosecute this war it is important that Congress either provides express authorization for our involvement in the conflict or calls on the president to cease operations."
"I hope the Congress and the Senate vote next week to get the United States out of aiding Saudi Arabia in this very terrible war and works on a humanitarian solution and works to bring peace to a very volatile region," Sanders told reporters Wednesday as he departed a classified briefing on Yemen for all senators by Trump administration officials.
Pentagon leaders oppose the resolution and have argued refueling and the other limited assistance they are providing don't constitute "hostilities" that need congressional approval.

Russia vetoes UN resolution linking Iran with terror activities in Yemen

Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican who chairs Foreign Relations, said he agrees.
"We do so much of that with our allies around the world and don't consider that to be involved in hostilities but simply helping our allies in what they're doing," Corker said. "I think if we use the War Powers Act to call these kinds of activities hostilities, we could go down a really slippery slope."

Senators and aides involved in the issue say they are unsure where the votes are and predict it could be close. GOP leaders may try to redirect the measure on procedural motion, for which a majority vote is needed to succeed.

Such a move could diffuse the issue, which will take place the same week Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman visits Washington.

A study shows weapons imports to the Middle East and Asia have soared over the past five years, with Saudi Arabia leading the steep rise amid its bloody war on Yemen.  

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), arms imports to the Middle East between 2013 and 2017 jumped by 103 percent compared with the previous five-year period.

Saudi Arabia is now the world’s second largest importer of arms after India. The kingdom registered a 225-percent rise in military purchases - almost all from the US and Europe - during the period, the study released on Monday said.

American weapons constitute 61 percent of arms imports to Saudi Arabia and British weapons 23 percent. During the period, the Saudis received 78 combat aircraft, 72 combat helicopters, 328 tanks and 4,000 vehicles, the SIPRI noted.

The same period, it said, saw Israel increasing its arms exports by 55 percent.

“The US and European states remain the main arms exporters to the region and supplied over 98 percent of weapons imported by Saudi Arabia,” it said.

On Friday, Saudi Arabia signed a preliminary deal to buy 48 Typhoon jets worth as much as $10 billion. 

Saudi Arabia already operates more than 70 Typhoon jets. They have been used extensively in the Yemen war, and the deal is likely to spark outrage among rights groups and campaigners.

Arms remain the main component of UK-Saudi trade and the UK government has approved the export of $6.4 billion in weapons since the start of the war in Yemen, despite allegations that Saudi-led forces have committed war crimes.

The United Kingdom has increased its weapons sales by around 500 percent since March 2015, The Independent reported last November.
PressTV-Saudi, UK to finalize hefty warplane deal amid protests
Britain and Saudi Arabia agree to finalize a warplane deal despite protests against Riyadh's deadly war on Yemen.

Last May, US President Donald Trump visited Saudi Arabia in his first foreign visit, signing a $110-billion deal to sell weapons to the kingdom.

“Widespread violent conflict in the Middle East and concerns about human rights have led to political debate in Western Europe and North America about restricting arms sales,” said senior SIPRI researcher Pieter Wezeman.

“Yet the US and European states remain the main arms exporters to the region and supplied over 98 percent of weapons imported by Saudi Arabia.”

More than 13,600 people have died since the Saudi-led invasion began, and Yemen has turned into the scene of the world's worst humanitarian crisis.

Comments (17)
[Hasan Hakim]
Hasan Hakim3 days ago 15:48
The Talmudic-Crpyto saudi mafia is an Insult to Islam, I Am 63-Yrs-Old, I Pray ALLAH-(SWT) Lets me live to see the Day When The Proud Yemeni People March into Arabia & free the Kabba from these Edomites.........In Iran [Che Guevara] Pictured Below Is Studied May ALLAH-(SWT) Have Mercy On His Soul.....
[Joseph Lieberman]
Joseph Lieberman3 days ago 10:59
Wherever they are located, let all Saudi weapon stockpiles be destroyed.
Im sure even saudi citizens are ready to do this deed, for the sake of justice.
[Pakistan Is Moving Away From US What is Saudi Doing?]
Pakistan Is Moving Away From US What is Saudi Doing?3 days ago 09:30
While you are in Pakistan Dear Zarif ask the Pakistani Government a sensitive question that they don't like to answer if possible about Saudi Arabia Terrorist Activities & servile attitudes to Terrorist states like UK, US and Israel that has not only killed hundreds & thousands of innocent Muslims Sunni or Shia but also Non Muslims raping women and children supporting IS, ISIS, Daesh, Takfari, Al-Qaeda and other rotten groups of Zionism and surly that DOES NOT serve the interest of "Islam" and the "Main Stream Unity of Islam" on the whole as "Creator" has intended and how the fight against this UK-US-Israel-Saudi TERRORISM should end...
[(We?) Unknown Higher Order Entity Since 2011...]
(We?) Unknown Higher Order Entity Since 2011...3 days ago 09:02
The very puppet regime of Saudi Arabai is 100% "HARAM" and a GREAT insult to "Islam" & "Main Stream Unity of Islam" and a abominable act against "Creator"...
[David Kuperman]
David Kuperman3 days ago 08:18
Weapons can not save Saudi Monarchy.
FREE PALESTINE3 days ago 07:48
methos3 days ago 06:48
The Saudi Regime is a cash cow for the west, as they do nothing but stockpiling armament operated by unmotivated foreign mercenary
Ap3 days ago 03:33
This brainless Saudi idiot only make people laugh but nothing else but that day is not so far when they will face irreversible consequences which must lead their complete destruction.
john3 days ago 03:19
another war against iran by arabs is highly likely. islamic republic got many enemies both inside middle east and outside it.this is how stupids diplomacy works creating more enemy for a bankrupt country with no agriculture no industry no future no hope.
Ali3 days ago 03:13
These Arms are useless to the people who have no ability to fight - THE REAL REASON behind buying these arms is the theft of ARABIAN RESOURCES - The Crypto Jews ruling Arabian peninsula are funding British and US aggression in Middle east. Britain and US (the greatest Debtor) cannot sustain their hostile policy without the Oil dollars they cunningly steal from Muslim lands. In the past the Arab rulers would lose trillions in Casino (as covert gift to US and Britain)
J.J._Knows_the_I.D.F._R_Cowards3 days ago 03:10
It doesn't take a long time after opening a History Book to realize that
when a Country is arming like K.S.A. is, they're intending to use those
arms in aggressive wars against their neighbors.
Any nations that K.S.A.has shown any type of aggression towards
need to arm themselves now for defense.
Assad3 days ago 02:10
Brainless idiots/imbeciles are appointed at the head of Saudi government by international gangsters
Gharib3 days ago 02:09
Why then Saudi's cannot win the war in Yemmen?

For fairness, Yemen should be granted the 'Nobel Prize for resistance'.
Assad3 days ago 02:06
Saudi Arabia with its huge oil revenues is used by Zionist gangsters as a marionnette and serves as a venue for flooding the Middle East with arms for terrorist activities. Arms paid for by Saudi money. Gangsters steal oil and the money
[Hasan Hakim]
Hasan Hakim> Assad3 days ago 15:50
1000% Correct-!!!!
[Lion od Haqq]
Lion od Haqq3 days ago 01:24
The ruling Gulf Arab puppets are not Muslims. They kill and persecute elderly, women, children, all on behalf of USrael. Shame on them.
[Hasan Hakim]
Hasan Hakim> Lion od Haqq3 days ago 15:56
Cowards Have No Shame
When Ali Ibn Abi Talib-(A.S.)
Was On The Battlefield, the Cowards Pulled Down There Pants & Ex-posed Themselves to the Great Imam-(A.S.) The Imam-(A.S.) Let Them Be & Looked Away For A Worthy-Opponent............

Thursday, March 15, 2018

UK Brexit desperation and support of Saudi islamofascists and their war crimes behind poison hypocrisy

Preparing for war actions in Syria etc. before the poison question is investigated properly and while the lynching mentality UK government itself induced is still working?

Listen to this BBC Radio 4 interview where the only one daring to be slightly critical (John Humphrys - age 74) clearly points to Boris Johnson's utter nonsense talk about Russia and and the poisoning affair. Klevius warns, you might vomit because of the graphic hypocrisy in Johnson's words.

Why is it that the UK government as well as most of the parliament (except Corbyn) are so keen on protecting Saudi islamofascists and demonizing Russia?

England (aka UK) now constitutes the worst security threat to EU (and to itself) because of Brexit. England wants to stir as much tensions as possibly for the purpose of keeping within EU when it comes to weapon trade and "security". England also wants to combine this with influence and arms contracts with Saudi islamofascists and other muslim countries. And in doing this England's politicians want to utilize average muslims as a means to protect the islamofascist "guardians of islam". 

Dear reader, Klevius has never been to Russia and has never had any Russian friends or contacts whatsoever despite the fact that Klevius has lived much of his life not far from the Russian border.  Moreover, Klevius has never been a Communist nor does he approve of many things Russia stands for, such as e.g. being "islam's best friend", violating Human Rights when it comes to sex segregation etc. (just as so many other countries also do). See e.g. what Klevius wrote about the Pussy Riots.

Klevius wrote:

Thursday, August 09, 2012

OIC, the real force behind the ideological rape of the Pussy Riot

Klevius: Dear reader! You're a true idiot or, alternatively, a truly disgusting personality if you call this analysis "islamophobia"!

And you! Please educate yourself about Negative Human Rights and islamic Sharia slave finance during 1400 years!

To understand sex apartheid, please read What's sex segregation?!

Politicians and religians in UN, UK. US, Russia etc. sell out your Human Rights through cooperation with islamofascist Saudi based muslim OIC (all muslims Sharia steered world organization)!

OIC has some 1.4 Billion muslims (most of whom have not a clue of what's going on). Some 30-40% (only 500 Millions, but still) of these muslims want Sharia. However, OIC wants to impose Sharia on EVERY MUSLIM!


What is OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration?

The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) is a declaration of the member states of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference adopted in Cairo in 1990, which affirms islamic Sharia as its sole source. CDHRI declares its purpose to be "general guidance for Member States [of the OIC] in the Field of human rights". 
Predominantly Muslim countries, such as Sudan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, frequently criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its perceived failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non-Western countries.
Though using a universalist language akin to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it clearly expresses an islamic particularity. The preamble is mostly religious rhetoric, and the particulars of the CDHRI contain numerous references to the Quran, sharia and aspects of islam that appear on no other similar international list. The CDHRI concludes in article 24 and 25 that all rights and freedoms mentioned are subject to the islamic Sharia, which is the declaration's sole source. The CDHRI declares "true religion", i.e. islam, to be the "guarantee for enhancing such dignity along the path to human integrity". It also places the responsibility for defending those rights upon the entire Ummah, i.e. ON EVERY MUSLIM.
The CDHRI has also been criticized by others than Klevius and Littman, for being implemented by a set of states with widely disparate religious policies and practices who had "a shared interest in disarming international criticism of their domestic human rights record."
Article 24 of the declaration states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 also says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia."
The CDHRI has been criticised for failing to guarantee freedom of religion as a "fundamental and nonderogable right".
In a joint written statement submitted by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status, the Association for World Education (AWE) and the Association of World Citizens (AWC): a number of concerns were raised, that the CDHRI limits Human Rights, Religious Freedom and Freedom of Expression. It concludes: "The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is clearly an attempt to limit the rights enshrined in the UDHR and the International Covenants. It can in no sense be seen as complementary to the Universal Declaration."
The Centre for Inquiry in September 2008 in an article to the United Nations writes that the CDHRI: "undermines equality of persons and freedom of expression and religion by imposing restrictions on nearly every human right based on Islamic Sharia law."
Rhona Smith writes that because the CDHRI's reference to Shariah implies an inherent degree of superiority of men.
Adama Dieng, a member of the International Commission of Jurists, criticised the CDHRI. He argued that the declaration gravely threatens the inter-cultural consensus on which the international human rights instruments are based; that it introduces intolerable discrimination against non-Muslims and women. He further argued that the CDHRI reveals a deliberately restrictive character in regard to certain fundamental rights and freedoms, to the point that certain essential provisions are below the legal standards in effect in a number of Muslim countries; it uses the cover of the "Islamic Shari'a (Law)" to justify the legitimacy of practices, such corporal punishment, which attack the integrity and dignity of the human being.

Pussy Riot, Suffragettes of our time

In March 2012, during an improvised and unauthorized concert in Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, the three women from the band were arrested and charged with hooliganism and their trial began in late July. The band members have gained sympathy both within Russia and internationally due to allegations of harsh treatment while in custody and a risk of a possible seven-year jail sentence, but have also been criticized in Russia as well for offending the feelings of religious people.

Pussy Riot's lawyers have said the circumstances of the case have revived the Soviet-era tradition of the show trial. However, a more important connection may be cold political power diplomacy, esåecially via islam, although often camouflaged with0"defense of other religions .

Religious diplomacy can be described as a state activity consisting of the use of a religious factor in foreign policy; that is, the whole set of mechanisms for state cooperation with religious associations in the pursuit of pragmatically defined national interest, use of the international activity of religious institutions, ideas and religious symbols (appropriately interpreted to comply with current political aims) and so on. It is important to emphasise pragmatism of architects of religious diplomacy for it does not depend solely on the—professed— religiosity of political elites.

Nor is religious diplomacy exclusive to theocratic states. Religious institutions (actors) and religious ideas, symbols etc. are treated in this context foremost as assets, which can be used in order to achieve political goals. However, it is not easy to draw a clear-cut line between personal convictions of an individual and his political decisions and it is practically impossible to determine if a particular act was a result of a sheer political calculation or stems—at least partly—from religious motives.

Although decisionmakers usually have at least a sentimental relationship to the given belief, this does not necessarily have to be the case—the religious factor can be used in foreign policy regardless of a decision-maker’s attitude to faith.

Klevius: All religions, but specifically islam, constitute defamation of Human Rights! 

For you who have problem with this extremely simple and crystal clear logic, let me explain in plain language:

1) Weird religious/super-natural, astrological, creationist etc individual thoughts have no bearing on this topic. On the contrary, Human Rights give you the right to have whatever thoughts as long as you don't harm others.

2) All religions are collective racism and/or sexism. Some, like islam, are even totalitarian. However, whereas totalitarian islam restrticts the rights of women and other non-muslims, "totalitarian" Human Rights do the exact opposite namely defend those rights. This is why islam (OIC) could never accept Human Rights without destroying itself! And this fact together with the fact that islamic ideology has been behind the worst collective historical crime throughout 1400 years explains why islam (OIC) now is so eager to criminalize any discussion about it! 

Monday, March 12, 2018

The muslim scimitar against the Western "infidel". Or today, Saudi islamofascism (OIC sharia) against Human Rights

The scimitar on Finland's and Karelia's coat of arms symbolizes the evil of islam - not Russia (although Ivan was terrible, he wasn't an ideology).

Before the appearance of the scimitar trampling lion on the coat of arms of Finland muslim Tatar warriors carrying scimitars* repeatedly attacked and pillaged the coast of Finland with devastating effect on the locals.

* Tatars used by Russia (Muscovite) carried Cossack style sabers, not scimitars.

Finland's coat of arms (top right) is first known from the 1580s (on Gustav Vasa's tomb in Uppsala cathedral), while the Karelian coat of arms (below Finland's) was seen already in 1562.

Uppsala cathedral, built after the Viking age on top of Sweden's original sacred non-Christian site. Uppsala was the natural and closest connection from Finland via the archipelago (see Klevius Finland-Swedish history lesson on Kvenland).

The symbol of the lion is derived from the arms of the Folkung family, which are included in the royal arms of Sweden. The beginning of the Folkung family can be mythologically traced to Fornjotr, the King of Kvenland and Gotland (ca 160-240 AD).

Finland-Swedish Leif Tengström made a desperate 1,000 page long effort in Muschoviten-- Turcken icke olijk": Ryssattribut, och deras motbilder, i svensk heraldik från Gustav Vasa till freden i Stolbova (1997 - ("The Muscowite, not unlike the Turk" : Russian attributes in Swedish heraldry from Gustavus Vasa [1523] to the peace-treaty of Stolbova [1617]. Diss. -- Jyväskylä University) - trying to disprove a better Finland-Swedish historian, Matti Klinge, who already 1981 established the scimitar on the weapon as representing muslims. Tengström vehemently opposed this view but after a decade long research he had to admit his failure but covered it up in a charlatanic excuse, i.e. that the scimitar just represented a general "western" xenophobia against both Russia and islam. In fact, Tatar warriors were all over the place, even fighting for the Muscovites, but they can't possibly have been the prototype for the muslim scimitar on the coat of arms.

Tatar muslim warriors were sent to Arabia to learn how to hate "infidels" - and then utilized by a Polish King (Sigismund II Augustus) who said he "liked the muslim way of keeping with old customs".

Klevius: Reminds me of how the islamofascist Saudi dictator family still today uses the old islamic method of "teaching" hate against the "infidels" (compare Rohyngia jihadis, Sri Lankan jihadis - or just any Sunni jihadi all over the world.

How many acid, knife, car, bomb, rape etc. attacks against people in England have been induced by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's spread of islamic hate? Klevius think they are far more than anything induced by Russia.

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, January 24, 2016

Putin didn't murder Litvinenko and Politkovskaja - islam did!

 But Putin - and Cameron - may be seen as accomplices due to their close "friendship" with islam

Klevius wrote a long time ago: 

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Did Islam in Chechnya kill Anna Politkovskaya because of her planned trip there?

Putin: "Russia is the most reliable partner of the Islamic world and most faithful defender of its interests"! Klevius comment: Chechnya is now ruled by expansionist Islamists notorious for kidnapping (even outside its own borders, e.g. in Ingushetia) torture, murder etc. and the young PM Ramzan Kadyrov is planning an "arena-sized" mosque etc in the war torn state. Allegedly Anna Politkovskaya was about to publish an article with witness evidence of torture in Chechnya by Ramzan Kadyrov himself.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Klevius Friday analysis: Did Islam kill Politkovskaya & Litvinenko? And is it really wise to have an islamist heading IAEA?

An original feature of Islam (see Origin of Islam) is its creeping via dirty routes such as slave and drug trails. "Infidels" can be abused and it´s just good for Islam to profit on poisoning them.

Like in Iraq, Sudan, Somalia etc. the bloodshed in Chechnya (after Jeltsin) has essentially been caused by Islamists rather than liberators. However, when Putin got enough of naive and extremely onesided Western media criticism - one that didn't (and still doesn't) even see "the worst crime ever against humanity" - he made a deal with Islam which now aids Islamic expansion in the region and a horrifying Taliban-Chechnya-Europe drug/mafia etc trafficking trail occupied by almost everything from Al-Qaeda to KGB agents/mafiosos, but all connected by Islamic expansion. Politkovskaya reluctantly started opening her eyes (see Oct 7 posting) whereas Litvinenko was probably even more naive - he also claimed Putin was behind terror bombings etc in Moscow (sic) - when faced with a reality that didn't fit the prevalent media hypocrisy of "it's not Islam" but Bush or Putin.

Klevius comment: According to Litvinenko, Mario Scaramella (Napoli) gave him (Nov 1, 06) data on Politkovskaya's proposed killers, doubtful, however, if he really read the four pages. In 2001 the Russian Federal Security Service allegedly claimed a Chechen trace in 9/11 was found among Chechen Islamists led by "Abdurakhman the Little": a blueprint-CD of a Boeing 737; a manual for pilots; explosive device, weapons, munitions and Saudi Islam (Wahhabi) literature. It was also said that some 300 Chechen Islamists guarded Bin-Laden in Afghanistan and a special Chechen battalion fought for Saddam Hussein against the US led liberation campaign.

Did the Polonium (extremely easy to carry and smuggle) come from Iran and the murderer fron Arabia?

One probable source of Polonium (Po-210) is Iran which long since has experimented with this stuff for the purpose of blasting their upcoming nukes!

In her last interview Politkovskaya accused the Islamist Chechen leader Kadyrov ("Stalin of our times" as she described him) and his militia: "Right now I have two photographs on my desk. I am conducting an investigation about torture today in Kadyrov's prisons. These are people who were abducted by Kadyrovsty for completely inexplicable reasons and who died. These are bodies absolutely disfigured by torture." Then she was murdered, most probably by Islam!
Kadyrov has recently been warmly welcomed by Saudi Islamofascist leadership.

Is it really clever to let an islamist, soft on Iran, head IAEA?!

Iran has, according to several anonymous sources, brought huge amounts of beryllium from different countries. Interestingly beryllium can be combined with polonium-210 to blast a nuclear bomb. It has also been alleged that IAEA (part of UN) chief Mohamed El Baradei, an Egyptian islamist, did know abt it but didn't tell the IAEA board of governors!

Klevius comment: How come that the very same UN that was created to protect the world from fascism now is heavily infested with and influenced by islamofascism (incl. Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Iran etc)?!

Saturday, March 10, 2018

Klevius question: Isn't sexism "multicultural" and "diverse" more than "white"?

Feminist asks: How important should we allow it to be for men to to have the "right" to get sex? Klevius answers: Not important at all. Because of heterosexual attraction ("male gaze"*) women with informed and free consent should always decide - incl. within marriage (women should not be doomed to whoring**).

The folk use of "feminism" fits Klevius. However, real feminists using "feminist theory" is quite a different horse. A horse that runs backwards towards the beginning of feminism itself where feminists opposed the vote, denied women playing football etc.

* The reason Klevius isn't a feminist but instead suggests Human Rights no matter of sex (as expressly noted in the 1948 Human Rights declaration - which islam vehemently opposes) is that feminist theories exclude women's role in their own oppression - as well as excluding women who want to leave the "feminine" without cutting or drugging themselves. Although feminist theorists talk about "women's own experience", they always exclude women who transgress feminists' beloved sex segregation border between "masculine" and "feminine". This is also why Klevius had a problem using feminist "research" in his PhD thesis. The most important of women's experience are excluded. So Klevius had to do in depth interviews with such women - and with remarkable result.

Not only extremist feminists but also mainstream feminists function as "guardians" of the cultural borders of sex segregation, i.e. the pressure on girls/women to look/behave in an ever changing (both locally and temporally) confused "feminine" way.

** This of course also means that women have no automatic right to sex from men either.
Btw, Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it) thinks he's is qualified for talking about sex and sexual harassment. Why? Well, firstly, Klevius has way more sex hormones than feminists. In fact so much so no woman has seen him failing sexually. Secondly, no woman has been pushed, or even "seduced" to sex by Klevius. Thirdly, Klevius has a history of several marriages (with equally many daughters and sons plus grandchildren) and other longterm  and shortterm relationships incl. five years as a quite popular bachelor between going steady. Fourthly, Klevius still feels as a horny but non-sexist teenager. 

So why is Klevius talking in this ridiculous way? Well, just to show that there has been enough possibilities for Klevius to be sexist - but he hasn't. And because Klevius doesn't think he's a superman, the inevitable conclusion is that most other men can perform similarly if released from sex segregation. And to be "released from sex segregation" simply means "loosing" one's "manhood" - as Klevius did when he was 17 and the cutest girl on the disco he had managed to get interested told him later on that "it felt so relaxing when you didn't try to get me in bed all the time". 

And of course Klevius understands that less cute girls/women might fall into the trap of using their asses as confirmation that they are attractive. In fact, many of Klevius early girlfriends begged for sex, not because they were necessarily so horny but because they wanted to tell their friends about it.
And finally, although Klevius is so much more sexually potent than any feminist out there, he has never felt any need for sex gadgets of any sort. Nor has he ever thrown white pepper just for getting a sneezing "orgasm". And to be honest, Klevius doubts that they can develop a female sex robot that could interest him. Wonder why? Cyber sex, yes, but not a robot. The human consent is what turns Klevius on.

RFSU is a Swedish state sponsored organization for sex education. Klevius thought RFSU's pic looked strange so he added a more normal view. However, feminists theorists would have condemned both pics as "objectification", i.e. what Klevius calls heterosexual attraction.

Klevius wrote about Linda and her friend 14 years ago. Nothing has changed since.

Scandinavian new paper Aftonbladet uses a picture of a half fat white man with Viagra pills to illustrate sexual harassment etc. Klevius isn't fat nor has he ever needed Viagra. However, to make the pic more "multicultural" Klevius added some skin tones from Oprah Winfrey's cheek. Sorry about that Oprah...

We aren't supposed to "stereotype" sharia muslims  as racist and sexist Human Rights violators because "not all muslims are". Despite the fact that sharia - e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC via UN - overrides and even criminalizes the most basic of Human Rights

However, Klevius is all the time associated with "white men" in negative context, although Klevius in every aspect is outside that realm. If Klevius would try to be better than the offered caricatures of "white men" he would end up as a god. And nothing could be more offensive for a true Atheist as Klevius.

Klevius wrote (do note that is a web museum not touched upon for more than a decade):

Sunday, December 05, 2004

Tarik Ramadan's Islamic hypocrisy

Tarik Ramadan (the ultimate sexist - see From Klevius without love): "I think that God blesses -- and should bless -- all the countries and all the way."

Klevius' translation: "I think that the Islamic Allah should bless the whole world in all ways"! Klevius comment: This is, per definition, pure totalitarianism as far as possible from the Holy 1948 (negative) Human Rights Declaration (explained on Klevius' definition of negative human rights)!

Saturday, December 04, 2004

When Islamic fundamentalists and "their" women move West

Women risk lives criticizing Muslim extremists
In Somalia, says Allas, "If you are a girl, you always are in fear of your parents, your older brothers, your male neighbors. It is always the man ... It is always fear and fear and fear.

"When I came to Holland, for me it was, Whew! What freedom! What a country! It was love, immediately," she recalls.

"But Holland is not the same."

Award for anti-fascist work and death threat from Islam

Tuesday, November 30, 2004

Feminism and Islam both share sex segregation

Klevius' comments to an Islamist's view on women.

According to:

Muslim Response to Feminism: Holistic Approach

" Holistic approach does not isolate woman from absolute society , they see womans rights and position within the whole structure of the society and avoid the segragation of society in terms for feminism or masculinism or any sort of monocentric approach as opposed to feminism."

Klevius' comment: On the contrary, "women's rights and position within the whole" is segregation in precisely the same way as feminism!

"According to holistic approach, society as a whole including men and women are addressed to their individual and social responsibility without any monosex inclination. The feminist perspective is monosexim perspective, neglecting the valueable place of men and woman side-by-side as a unifying force in family and in society. Holitsic approach looks at one comprehensive position of woman and man in public, private, in society and in politics."

Klevius' comment: "individual and social responsibility" (for men and women respectively) again is segregation! And the idea that feminism is a monosexism is ridicilous having in mind that the ultimate political aim of most feminisms is to underline the difference between men and women! See Why do you call yourself a feminist, Judith Butler?

"One of the distinguished scholars who offered the holistic approach was Shaheed Mutahhari. He explained the reason and the necesaty of different treatment of woman in Islam according to biological and pychological differences between man and woman. while the apologists try to reread the Holy text in line with change - changed codition of the current society."

Klevius' comment: This non-problem (i.e. the lunatic idea that a man can't handle his attraction towards women without burkas etc - in fact real rapists, no matter if they rape because of Islamic "infidel" contempt or some other bad cultural reasoning, aren't biologically but culturally determined to do so) is out-lined and "solved" on From Klevius without love (+ additional links offered on the page). The pages also explain why feminists contrary to Islamists deny HSA (heterosexual attraction).

Peter Klevius

Klevius wrote:

Saturday, December 31, 2005

Swedish sex segregation 2005 - In memory of Linda 13, sex slave* & abused to death by "a gang" in her school

Background: Strange Swedish attitudes in the public debate! Swedish white collar fascists /former defender of Pol Pot etc?) now want to stop external criticism against totalitarian Islam (i.e. against an ideology that forbids internal criticism)! Also see Klevius' Definition of Religion (usually top-rated on MSN)!

Also note that According to British YouGov's survey 2005 one in four (abt half a million) British Muslims sympathises with motives of Islamic terrorists- more than 100.000 British Muslims are ready to actually support Islamic terrorists- about 16,000 British Muslims declare themselves willing, possibly even eager, to embrace Islamic violence (For the worldwide spreading of Islam, and to conquer the non-Islamic world?!).

Official Sweden talks child abuse at home while kids are abused to death at schools (Swedish readers may compare this with the analyses presented in Ekot om incest )!
* Linda said she felt like a slave (compare the girls in Darfur raped by Islamic paramilitaries) on the school's toilet when she had to give sex services to the boy with "many dangerous relatives" (also see Nov 30 posting below abt Gangs of Arabs & dogs terrorizing Sweden). This is in line with e.g. "street Islam" (see Brief history of true Islam) which states (compare Koran's "infidel" and marriage/rape practices) that "white" girls/women are whores and should be abused and intimidated! Which is exactly what is taught in many Muslim (or Islam influenced) homes, before the kids show up as evil gangs in schools and on the streets! This racism is the real power of Islam, from Mohammed to the irresponsible parents of the kids chasing Linda. And equally irresponsible Swedish political correctness! Compare the Swedish chancellor of justice, Göran Lambertz, who isn't at all interested in the Swedish Radio Islam's continuing denial of Holocaust and extreme hatred propaganda against Jews! Today Islam is the world's most powerful violent ideology. Is that why not only Saudi-Arabic oil-billionaires but also the Swedish state and Swedish white collar fascists so eagerly support and defend it?! Also see the horryfying WMD-link Sweden-Iran!
and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "Islam must prepare to rule the world".

Also compare the Rissne gang rape case where the boys were fiercly defended against the Swedsh whore (age 14) etc. by a huge gang of parents and relatives. Their ultimate "penalty" then was to visit an Islamist imam (sic)! I.e. the representative for what actually might have boosted their and their parents' racist/sexist attitudes! "The informal censorship in stories related to immigration in Sweden. Similar incidents are reported with shocking frequency, to the point where some observers fear that law and order is completely breaking down in the country."

True Islam has a bad influence on both Muslim and non-Muslim cultures

Islam is an evil ideology of rapetivism, exploitation & conquest ultimately based on pure racism - not to be confused with cultural ethnicity of the people that have happened to live under this evil ideology! One might even say that most of the disadvantages may be traced to how Islam has affected people's behavior, not to the people! No matter which changes are made to it, true Islam (i.e. attraction of Islam) is based on infidel racism and sex segregation. Islam's jihad-"paramilitaries" in the West are youngsters brainwashed by parents and Koranic agitation at home, in youth organizations, mosques, on the street etc) If this attraction is removed, Islam becomes an empty eunuch just like Chistianity. And that's OK to me. In the long run both racism and sex segregation are doomed anyway - just like true Islam!

Islam at work today: 20,000 Egyptian riot police kill at least 25 unarmed Sudanese refugees in Cairo outside UN!!!

But Sweden now praises and rewards misled and brainwashed children who at school write naive and glorifying nonsense abt Islam (uncritically gathered from Islamist sources). These writings and Linda's death represent the two extremes of the Swedish hypocrisy (also see Hypocritical Swedish misogynist imam Leif Karlsson).

For a background see From Klevius without love - freedom from sex segregation
Klevius' definition of religion
Klevius' definition of (the holy) negative human rights

"We feel every effort is made to silence the real circumstances abt Linda's death" (i.e. political correctness of the social state may not be disturbed? Also note that Sweden has a compulsory school, unlike in other Nordic countries were it's only the fulfilling of a child's education that is compulsory - not the attendance in one of the world's worst school system!).

Linda, 13, was a Swedish girl who, together with her best friend, used not to follow the stereotypical, stupid ("sexy") girlish style (often incl. being sex servants to certain boys) so common now in Sweden (see the Swedish girl problem and Angels of Antichrist and Sex segregation in LVU). She was sporty, climbing etc "Tomboy".
But a certain "gang" (plus, of course, the ordinary confused Swedish school attitude: glorifying Islam, pro-sex segregation, pro-child sex, etc) forced her (after severe bullying) to wear make up etc. Then she was sexually abused on the school's toilet while 6-7 of his friends were outside (like many other helpless Swedish girls). The day she eventually hung herself by using her sister's jump rope, she had been called a whore and other namings by a boy who also physically abused her and threatened to send his relatives on her.

Status among girls is based on "drinking, smoking, giving boys sex services, and using lots of make up and sexy clothes." Sounds pretty pathetic to me. According to Linda's friend "they" who have power control the school - including the pathetic Swedish teachers (compare P. Klevius' Echo of Incest, an analysis of the strange fact that while Western bio-parents are the least likely to commit sexual abuse. they are the most targeted, and vice versa, while sexual abuse committed by other kids in a heavily depending/pressuring environments at school etc, are the most common, they are the least addressed!).

Also compare the weird psychoanalytic idea abt the necessity of sex etc stupidities (From Freud to bin Laden). And it seems the younger the better. Compare the Swedish state funded institute that sexually abused 6 year old children by forcing them to listen to stories abt oral sex etc (see e g Swedish state pedophilia rewarded) !

Linda was described as secure and happy at home and outside the school.


Nature Shinto meets the raping fields of monolitheist** Islam - i.e. the world's oldest family religion with the world's best high tech vs. the world's youngest state "religion" with brainwashing Koran schools, physical & cultural desertation & low-tech totalitarianism
** Klevius' naming

Klevius' sites & blogs so far the only ones clearly addressing the horrors, abuse and confinement of sex segregation!

Update: Georgetown’s Capitulation to Radical Islam

Rape stats: 44% of women who were date raped have considered suicide!

Klevius wrote:

Saturday, June 10, 2006

A dedication to Edith Södergran from Peter Klevius without love

Link to Klevius love letter to Edith Södergran

The foremost Nordic modernist poet, Edith Södergran, was a Finland-Swedish like Peter Klevius (meaning she belonged to a small Swedish language/cultural tradition in Finland). This minority group has lived in a special niche between the east and the west (compare e.g. Johannes Salminen). Although this may have contributed to some disturbed creativity (see Inside Klevius' mind) the main point here is a formula for analyzing sex segregation in regard to human existence.

Also see how Edith Södergran was abandoned by her sex

Edith Södergran symbolizes the modern human being trapped between loneliness in search for salvation (see Was Jesus Religious and Angels of Antichrist and World Values Survey) and fascist gang belonging (compare Islamofascism)


To destroy Islamofascism you need to destroy Islam, i.e. its connection to Koran (as hinted by the pope and others)! And yes, Islamofascism may continue even after this, BUT, without the indirect support of "moderate" Islamists and their supporters, the pure evilness will be more easily recognized and hence less attractive for sexist lunatics!

It's not only that Islam (according to Koran) clearly supports slavery (and Koran is the final word of god according to Islam), but that the whole concept of Islam is based on slavery and rapetivism. It's the main idea and Islam is the manual for organizing it! Islam is the refined system of sponging on slavery/rapetivism, and this "ideology" was born pragmatically in the already existing slave trade routes through Mecca etc. (pilgrimage was originally simply a slave merchant's trip to the slave market in Mecca - see e.g. M. Gordon: Slavery in the Arab World) . This is also the reason why the racist contempt expressed under the title "infidels" is so essential in Islam. However, unlike Gordon (1987) above, Klevius offers an updated analysis of slavery and sex segregated rapetivism in historical Islam.

What is essential here is to understand that this feature of Islam cannot be eliminated without changing the whole concept. And this is impossible precisely because those violent etc. lunatics who represent Islam in accordance with its original message (Pope: "Islam's stuck with Koran" - see posting below) will always claim and benefit from every "dialogue" or "support" of Islam per se (i.e. Islam disguised as some "ethnicity" or "private faith" which it is clearly not)! This is how/why(?) "moderate" Islamists support evilness. This is also why Islam is giving incentives for trafficking in girls on night clubs in Sweden, and why Islam gives incentives for raping "infidels" and to sterilize them if they can't be converted to Islam (Girls, don't drink from glasses in public places!). And finally, this is perfectly in line with Islam's incentives for making money on the selling of drugs to the "infidels" while at the same time destroying these "infidels'" lives. Islamoterror in different forms is going on at schools, on streets etc. often boosted by Islamic contempt learnt from parents etc. Surprisingly little has changed during 1400 years when it comes to Islam!


Finland and Sweden are the only ones using the term "Foster-land" to describe their nationality. There lies a huge irony/tragedy in this very fact
Klevius page Fosterlandet Sverige tops Google before the Swedish PM Göran Persson


Thursday, March 08, 2018

Klevius to the world's women 2018: Stick to Human Rights and stop sex segregation!

Heterosexual attraction is neglected in sex education - often leaving girls/women conflating the effects of their bodies with their minds.

Islam admits heterosexual attraction and "cures" it with sharia sex apartheid. Klevius proposes the very opposite way. Why? Because Klevius doesn't think he is a super man when he has no problem with sexy women (despite being famous for never falling short in erotics). Klevius thinks he's the "extremely normal" - which conclusion would make sexual harassment by men a cultural and religious problem, not a biological necessity.

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, December 18, 2016

In Peter Klevius Yule* sex tutorial Geri Jewell reveals that "the denial was that the passion David had sexually I couldn't equal", and Michelle Thomson that when her friend raped her "it wasn't sexual".

* Yule is old Swedish (spelled 'jul') meaning wheel (which comes from the same word 'hjul') of the year, i.e. Vinter solstice around 21 December, and in modern times "Christmas" celebration although it has nothing to do with religion.

Klevius: All women are gay*. However, not every woman has realized it as yet...

Women, from a male point of view, have wonderful assess - just like feamale dogs from a male dog's perspective. And not only that, women have the potential to reproduce. And when women are receptive there are usually no lack of providers. So women should really not have anything to complain about in this respect. Other than, of course sex segregation/apartheid.

The sperm has to be attracted to the egg in some way. That's biological 'heterosexual attraction'. Testosterone is an important hormone in this task. However, the measurements are not easily compared between men and women because labs tend to (why?!) state the percentage of free testosterone for men, but give a measurement in pg/ml for women. Or the male measurements will be in ng/dl requiring a mathematical conversion for direct comparison to the "normal" range of the opposite sex. The level readings between men and women are so vastly different because the number represents a percentage of the TOTAL testosterone. Women naturally start with a much lower total amount, so 2.5% of 40ng/dl is going to be much less than 2.5% of 800ng/dl in a man.

However, even 20 times more Testosterone doesn't mean a man is necessitated to sex - merely that he is always potentially ready for sex (at least Klevius - the "extremely normal" - is and has always been since his adolescence). In other words, Klevius proposes that we lay to rest the old imposing "dog sex" culture and instead all treat each other as humans, not as sexual beings. However, to achieve this we need to teach young girls (and boys) about the only real difference between the sexes, namely heterosexual attraction, so it won't be confused with sexual acts (which people should of course be allowed to perform without any other restrictions than what the law says added with full and informed consent - just like most other civilized behavior. Moreover, and perhaps most importantly, we need to end the mostly male "push for sex" culture, i.e. dog behavior. Asexuality should be the default state of interaction.

And to avoid unnecessary confusion re. Klevius sex analysis, do understand that unlike physical reproduction in the female body (which is completely independent from the male one), heterosexual attraction needs both sexes although the female one is in this respect the passive one. At this point someone (especially women) might have problem reconciling this with the fact that many women do enjoy sexual acts without possessing the male type gaze for HSA. Klevius then repeats that although all women are gay, not all women do or enjoy sex, which fact should be respected equally as respecting that Klevius has never needed drugs or alcohol for being happy or having good sex, nor has he ever deliberately thrown white pepper around just for the pleasure of sneezing (rest calm, Klevius won't ever criticize you if you do).

And you, if you think this analysis is just Klevius opinion then you haven't understood it at all - read and think again. It's the same logic as 2+2=4.

1 HSA isn't sexual acts per se but a biologically inplanted interest for being attracted to having sex with females. Whereas dogs seem to be more excited by the smell of a female dog's pheromones, human males seem to be more interested in the shape of the female body. In fact, analytically there's no difference between gay sex and hetero sex if HSA isn't a factor (however, it would be enough to term it HSA sex if the male at least think about a physical woman - compare e.g. heterosexual men unknowingly being attracted to males disguised as women).

2 Males have way more potential urge for sex than women because of some 20 times more testosterone. And please, don't confuse this with what Klevius calls "rubbing sex", i.e. just stimulation of the genitals without HSA (compare the case of white pepper and sneezing).  

3  Being pregnant and having a baby has nothing to do with sex segregation at all because it's entirely a woman affair.

4 This means that all women, incl. asexual and achild ones ought to be treated equal with males. And as a consequence, this analysis also benefits men who want to get rid of their macho masculinity label as well as those who unnecessarily feel they're lacking one.

Peter Klevius drawing 'Woman' from 1979:

 Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsophobes with really limited understanding (i.e. PC), do note that the DNA "ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as escaping).

Whereas classic sex segregation (read more Klevius to better understand the concept) is imposed by circumstances, religious/cultural sex segregation is what is imposed on girls/women even when it's no longer necessary. In the latter case women have been held back by men to an extent where incompetency outside "women's sphere" increasingly became obvious. As a consequence grown up women started internalizing this incompetency as "femininity" although the only true femininity is defined by heterosexual attraction (read Klevius because you'll find nothing anywhere else so far - sad isn't it).

Peter Klevius 1979 poem 'My Friend':

A rough translation for those poor uneducated individuals lacking Swedish, the origin of the English language (oh, perhaps you were unaware of English being a Scandinavian* language - my deepest condolences):

* The oldest Swedish is Old Nordic. To call it "old Norse" wrongly associates it with Norway and Norwegian, both of which weren't around as entities until after the Viking age. As Klevius has always said: North Germanic, and probably Germanic per se, was a late IE outcome between proto-Uralic and PIE (i.e. what Klevius use to call "old Finland-Swedish").

A perception             (see/se, track/tryck, i.e. see-in-track/synintryck)
a touch
words as diffuse messengers
mirror a glimpse of your thought       (think/ing, tank/e)
in cipher form already distorted        (fore wronged/förvrängd/a)
before they've been said
by me and your expectation               (fore waiting/förväntan)
my friend                                  (  min frände, min vän)

Women on sex and work

Geri Jewell (top left), Nicola Sturgeon and Michelle Thomson (below). Nicola Sturgeon says she would not have suffered her career for a child. Michelle Thomson says she didn't think her rapist (a teenage friend) had any sexual desire when he raped her a night when she was 14 and they walked home together. This she told in front of a tear filled UK Parliament (she has also recently been questioned in a pending mortgage fraud case). However, Klevius doesn't believe in rape without sexual desire - what was lacking was respect for basic Human Rights equality, i.e. that her friend had been brainwashed by sex segregation to an extent that he saw her only as an object for heterosexual attraction, not as an other human being on an equal footing.

Actress and comedian Geri Jewell, who has cerebral palsy (witch has not affected her intelligence - only motorics), reveals in a new memoir, I’m Walking As Straight As I Can (alluding to her a-heterosexuality as well as her motoric disability) how much she struggled growing up with a disability and how she wrestled with her "sexuality" (or rather lack of it), and reveals she is a "lesbian", which is a code word for not possessing male heterosexual attraction genes nor same level of testosterone.

Geri Jewell was the first disabled actor to take a lead role in a sitcom and she's gone on to challenge ideas about what is possible. She describes the pressures on her to go into a job suited to her disability and what made her rebel against such restricting expectations

Peter Klevius: Her rebellion against such restricting expectations as created by cultural sex segregation is just stunning - although her escape under an equally sex segregated cover ("lesbian", "gay" etc.) is not. Why didn't she claim her Human Rights as described in the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration against fascism, which gives her the right to lead her life as she wishes without having to "explain" it. Or is it because she is an American, and the US Constitution still doesn't give women full equality with men - hence necessitating labels?
US women fighting in vain for equality some 70 years after Finnish women got full equality.

Klevius wrote:

Sunday, September 20, 2015

Islam, OIC - and Eurabia

Europe's fascist past reborn via religion

As long as fascism is called good - how could we ever stop it? But Klevius, as a critical European ("islamophobe" if you like) feels extremely embarrassed in front of those true refugees escaping islam and hoping for protection under Western Human Rights. Sorry!

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Klevius (the world's foremost authority on sex apartheid - sad isn't it) to all the world's women on women's day: Here's your main enemy exemplified as a timid "mosque mouse"!

Sharia islam is never good for your Human Rights if you are a woman. But willing whores and deceptive but off the point talks may well lure many women still.

 But the more important question is: Can you as a woman face your own sex apartheid history fully?

Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsophobes with really limited understanding (i.e. PC), do note that the DNA "ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as escaping).

Update: Learn more about heterosexual attraction and sex segregation/apartheid here.

The origin of islam was plundering and raping booty jihad along Jewish slave trade routes. 

 Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.

And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

 The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.  

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2  There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3  Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.

Klevius will tell you much more later. Keep tuned and excited!

A little, timidly nonsense speaking Swedish "reformist" Shia muslim "professor"* who rides on the non-muslim world's longing for "nice muslims".

* Klevius uses 'professor' only re. scientific researchers. Mixing in a "god" isn't science.

Whereas few women believe in the Islamic State, some morons still believe in the oxymoron "reformed islam". To understand the impossibility of a civilized islam one only has to go to its evil origin (as Klevius has done since 9/11). And if you for some strange reason don't want to listen to the world's foremost expert on sex apartheid - and therefore also islam -just take a closer lookj to what BBC and others don't want to talk about.

And you may laugh this Saudi billionaire hoodlum away as a Saudi joke but then you miss the very point, namely that:

1 OIC's sharia includes both the Saudi sharia as well as any other sharia that fulfills the lofty definition of the Cairo declaration.

2 The main reason (except for protecting the Saudi and other muslim nations medieval systems) for OIC's sharia declaration was that the 1948 Universal* Human Rights Declaration gives women full equality with men, which fact made it impossible for islam in whatever sharia form.

* There's a dumb view presented for even dumber people that the UN declaration was "Western made" and therefore biased. Nothing could be more wrong. The paper and the pen may have been "Western made" but the content is from scratch made deliberately "non-Western" i.e. universal. Educate yourself!

Unlike many other forms of sexism, muslim sexism is pure racism: Muslim women in every single variant of possible sharia islam are always treated as "the other".

A Shia muslim that is on the extreme fringe of Shia muslims and not even considered a muslim by the majority of the world's Sunni muslims, incl, most muslim so called "scholars".

A pathetic and disgusting Human Rights denier who "accuses" basic and universal Human Rights for being bad "because they came out of the West". Ok, cars etc. also came out of the West and yes, he could blame them for some pollution etc. and call it "post-colonialism". But how on earth could you possibly deny the logic of the negative (basic) Human Rights, or deny them because they "came out of the West". Well the reason "they came out of the West" is that the islam contaminated parts of the world didn't give them a chance to come out there.

So is he an outright lier trying to camouflage islam's incompatibility with the most basic of Human Rights- or is he, like so many muslims, incredibly dumb/ignorant/brainwashed?

Mohammad Fazlhashemi, professor in islamism (aka "islamic theology") and filosophy (sic)* at Uppsala University in Sweden: There are some essential norms in the Koran that can be used to protect human dignity in different ways depending on time and cisrumstances.

* As Wittgenstein already pointed out, philosophy is a difficult discipline even without trying to squeeze in a God scheme in it. And even more so when the "God" is totally out of reach and only exists as differing human "interpretations".

Klevius: "Protecting" women from having access to full Human Rights? And "human dignity" should be read "muslim male dignity" added by the important "who is interpreted as being a true muslim" which could, as we all know, vary quite a lot among muslims. Moreover, what about the dignity of non-muslims? Either you let muslims "interpret" it or you skip islam alltogether, because here lies the real difference between Human Rights that gives every Atheist or whatever person (even muslims) equal rights, and sharia islam which openly violates these rights, as can be seen, for example, in Saudi based and steered OIC's (all muslim's main world organization) official abandoning of Human Rights in UN. Mohammad Fazlhashemi, professor in islamism (aka "islamic theology") and racist/sexist "muslimn filosophy" can't possibly be unaware of OIC, the muslim world's biggest and most important institution, can he!

Mohammad Fazlhashemi: That islam is good can be proved by comparing it to the illiterate Arab speaking bedouins.

Klevius: Is that really a good enough standard as reference?

Mohammad Fazlhashemi: There's no logical connection between a muslim's belief and a muslim's rights.

Klevius: Apart from the fact that most muslims completely disagree with you, why do you then keep asking for muslim's rights? Why should muslim's have special rights because of their "beliefs"?

And here's this small minded muslim reformist's Shia source:

Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari: I do not call for a separation of politics and religion. Of course there should be cooperation between them.

Klevius: Cooperation between Human Rights violating sharia and politicians representing Human Rights doesn't sound very reformist, does it.

From an interview with Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari (spiced with Klevius comments): The way of life in Medina and Mecca was quite simple. But what took place then cannot be a model for today's world. Nowadays, Muslims live in intelligent social systems, in which there is a wide diversity of institutions. This requires us to develop a proper plan with the aid of reason. This is not something that can be derived from the Koran.

Klevius: At least he seems to admit that the slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina wasn't a good "model". Or did he mean something else? The muslim booty and sex jihad?

"During its Golden Age, Islam was known for highly controversial and pluralistic debates. Today, the reality in many Muslim countries is quite different. There is little freedom of thought.. What can be done to promote more freedom of thought in Muslim countries?"

Klevius: The "golden age" was just the same as today, i.e. muslims sponging on resources they haven't themselves created. Slaves back then - oil and Western welfare today. More than 90% of the economy in Andalus was based on slavery - fully in line with islam's original enslavement formula: "Infidels" (i.e. non-muslims and women) could be enslaved because Muhammad had heard Allah (via an angel though) saying so.

Shabestari: Freedom of expression all depends on whether a people has politically developed to such an extent that it understands what freedom is. Then it will demand freedom of expression. Even now there is a great tendency towards freedom in Islamic countries. Yet, why it hasn't truly developed is another question. This has to do with political hurdles and the system of government in these countries. It is more of a cultural difficulty than a difficulty related to Islam or religion in general. Unfortunately, this is a retrograde cultural reality.

Klevius: Admittedly Hillary Clinton's sharia campaign against freedom of expression represents "a retrograde cultural reality". However, how could it possibly not be directly connected to islam itself when she works for the world's biggest and most fundamental islam representing organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC?!

"The Arab protest movements are associated by many people, both within these countries and also abroad, with the hope for democracy. Others (muslims) say that Islam fundamentally forbids democracy."

Klevius: Yet it's all islam and muslims - no matter what it stands for. As a consequence it encompasses both the most evil of muslims as well as those "muslims" who can't be distinguished from non-muslims other than by name. And this state of affairs is of course most handy for the most evil of muslims.