Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japanese space robot 10 yrs before Rosetta

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Thursday, January 29, 2015

2010 Japan's IKAROS became the world's first spacecraft to sail on sunlight. But you wouldn't know if you read Robert Anderson and his biased write-alikes, would you!


Acknowledgement: Dear reader, you start realizing why Klevius has these loads of Japan related pics etc all over his sites, don't you! Yes, it's all about bias hunting.


Is there a religious reason to Japan's technological and quality superiority? I.e. the lack of (Judaic)religion!


Japan is a country that has managed (geographical location and smartness) to avoid the Judaic "monotheist" traditions of which there are and have been many varieties - although only the violent ones are usually named, i.e. the official state religion of the Roman empire (aka Christianity) and the parasitic and violently spread robber religion of the Judeo-Christian Arabs (aka islam).  Jews were the people God chose to slaughter the Canaanites. Christians were the community Constantine chose to slaughter the "Barbarians". And muslims were the community Mohammad chose to slaughter and enslave all of them, i.e. the "infidels".

Honda's Asimo robot a decade ago

Whereas the homeland of islam, Saudi Arabia hasn't by itself managed to produce anything except dates from slave worked palm plantations, the homeland of Shinto, Japan, has been the indisputable tech and quality leader of the world.


May 2010




January 2015

But Robert Anderson on January 27, 2015 had no idea about this when he wrote that: 'Have you ever thought of sailing in sunlight? No? The idea indeed sounds like some kind of magic or dream.  The scientists are all set to turn this dream into reality'.





Peter Klevius: Top tier! Is he a "muslim science" writer!


Robert is announced as a top tier university graduate in journalism. A professional journalist with several published articles and working as a free-lancer in his field, he has been able to capture public eye on his work. With the abilities he posses, he takes the readers by a swift.

Peter Klevius: What's wrong with me? I'm not swifted at all! And no wonder our media is so full of lies about islam etc. with these kind of journalists.


Some technical data about the Japanese IKAROS spacecraft


IKAROS is the first spacecraft to successfully demonstrate solar-sail technology in interplanetary space.

Whereas the US solar sail that is planned for a short test fly in May 2015 is only the size of a loaf of bread, the inter-planetary IKAROS sail has a diagonal of 20 meter.

IKAROS was successfully launched together with Akatsuki (the Venus Climate Orbiter) aboard a Japanese H-IIA rocket from the Tanegashima Space Center on 21 May 2010.

The IKAROS probe is the world's first spacecraft to use solar sailing as the main propulsion. It was planned to demonstrate four key technologies:

    Deployment and control of a large, thin solar sail membrane
    Thin-film solar cells integrated into the sail to power the payload
    Measurement of acceleration due to radiation pressure on the solar sail
    Attitude control via variable reflectance liquid crystal panels

The mission also includes investigations of aspects of interplanetary space, such as gamma-ray bursts, solar wind and cosmic dust.

The probe's instrument (ALDN-S and ALDN-E) measured the variation in dust density while its Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter (GAP) measured the polarization of gamma-ray bursts during its six month cruise.

IKAROS is to be followed by a 50 m (160 ft) sail, intended to journey to Jupiter and the Trojan asteroids.

The craft contains two tiny ejectable cameras, DCAM1 and DCAM2. DCAM2 was used to visualise the sail after deployment on 14 July 2010. One of those photos was considered in 2013 by Discovery News as one of the best space robot selfies. IKAROS has been recognized by Guinness World Records as not only the world’s first solar sail spacecraft between planets, but also that its two separated cameras, DCAM1 and DCAM2, are the smallest size of a spacecraft flying between planets.


Albert Einstein (born a Jew) and Peter Klevius happen to have the same view on the laughable* but also heavily tragic concept of a "god"

* Are we still allowed to laugh at people who believe in ghosts - or is it already considered an offense against ghost sensitivities - hence making you a racist? That it's considered racist to offend the sensitivities of the guy below on the pic we already know.


Albert Einstein: "For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."

Peter Klevius: Einstein said this in 1954 when he and most others thought we had finally got rid of both ideological, national and religious fascism by the help of the 1948 Human Rights declaration. However, now islam is not protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power - on the contrary, evil islam is protected from scrutiny and criticism by that very same organization due to Saudi based OIC and its islamofascist leader Iyad Madani.

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!











 Einstein expressed his skepticism regarding an anthropomorphic deity, often describing it as "naïve" and "childlike". He stated, "It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I feel also not able to imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. My views are near those of Spinoza: admiration for the beauty of and belief in the logical simplicity of the order which we can grasp humbly and only imperfectly. I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem—the most important of all human problems."

On 22 March 1954 Einstein received a letter from Joseph Dispentiere, an Italian immigrant who had worked as an experimental machinist in New Jersey. Dispentiere had declared himself an atheist and was disappointed by a news report which had cast Einstein as conventionally religious. Einstein replied on 24 March 1954:

    It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it


Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain: So what about you? Do you believe in a personal "Allah" or a muslim OIC/Ummah sharia "Allah"? Klevius and BBC's listeners expect an honest answer!


Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media.





Klevius wrote

Sunday, April 21, 2013

The complete lack of islamic science and progress


Why has there never been any true Arabic/islamic science and progress? Because of islamic Sharia parasitism, dude!


Islam is today trying to pathetically hide itself - much like the muslim Al-Qaeda terrorist Dzokhar Tsarnaev who was fueled by Saudi sponsored dreams of an islamist Khorasan

Remember that the absolute majority of deadly violence (terrorism) is committed by muslims and demanded by the Koran. Still, most of muslim street jihadism isn't even icluded. If you have a random sample of deranged people a certain percentage will commit violent crimes. However, if half of the sample is spiced with Koranic hatred against "infidels" then it's absolutely self-evident that this group will end up with even more violence! Klevius feels embarrassed to even mention such a matter of course but today we have ended up with a situation where pure visible naked evil has to be labeled as such - and even then people keep saying: But it's a religion - it can't be evil!


It was islam that more than 1,000 years ago gathered so many African slaves in what is now Iraq that a rebellion icluded more than half a million slaves.

It was islam that sanctioned African slavers to take as much as several tens of thousands of African slaves in a single pilgrimage to Mecca long before a single slave had entered the Americas.

Just a brief study of islam's history reveals an almost incomprehensible amount of slaves and suffering in the name of Allah, Mohammed and the Koran. As Klevius has repeatedly stated, we do need an islamic approach to history - not a cover up and whitewashing. Without understanding islam's deep rooted evilness one cannot make sense of the history of people contaminated by islam.

Jérôme Maurand, a 16th century French priest: "To see so many poor Christians, and especially so many little boys and girls [enslaved] caused a very great pity. The tears, wailings and cries of these poor Lipariotes, the father regarding his son and the mother her daughter... weeping while leaving their own city in order to be brought into slavery by those dogs who seemed like rapacious wolves amidst timid lambs. The old ones who hid in the cathedral were stripped and cut up while still alive just 'out of spite'. When we asked these Turks why they treated these poor Christians with such cruelty, they replied that such behavior 'had very great virtue'".

No other ideology comes even close. This is why OIC and other islam supporters so eagerly try to hide it!

The “common creed” rhetorics is what makes America (and other places) vulnerable to evil islam.

Obama: "Americans refuse to be terrorized". Klevius: Yes, by shutting their eyes.

If you are appalled by slavery, genocides and rapetivism - then you should be deeply ashamed of islam, because those are the main traces of islam in history! 


OIC wants to falsify and cover up islam's true slavery/genocide/rapetivism origin and history (i.e. what historically constitutes the worst ideological crime ever against humanity)


Klevius brief history of islam:


Origin of islam

The parasitic source code of islam: Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Origin of the Vikings (Klevius' evil forefathers)


Cathedral Catholicism

A product of the European defense against islam

Renaissance

The recovering from islamist jihadism and a slowly emerging understanding of the value of individual freedom as opposed to slavery.

Enlightenment

A slowly emerging understanding that religion is a dead end. Especially the excesses in Catholicism - which in turn was the result of islam's attacks on Europe.

Protestantism against Catholicism and the birth of industrialization and the modern (aka "Western") world civilization

When England eventually got rid of Catholicism 1688 the road was open for enlightened humans to use their individual creativity for industrial production.

Negative Human Rights declaration 1948

After the fall of the last muslim stronghold, the Ottoman "empire" (it fell as a result of the abolition of slavery), Europe again had to face a period of war  1914-1945 before resettling with a formula, Human Rights, that ended the theoretical possibility of evil racism and sexism. That the negative Human Rights were contaminated with positive so called Stalin rights should not in any sense disprove the former which are free from impositions.


The laughable oxymoron "islamic science", how could anyone possibly take it seriously?! Unless by ignorance out of whitewashing and brainwashing of course!


The  oxymoron "islamic science" is utter defamation of science, and is rooted in ignorance about the origin of islam!
Klevius science tutorial for Seyyid Hossein Nasr and others
Seyyid Hossein Nasr (“professor” of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University) at MIT Islamic Students Association (sponsored by the Pakistan Study Group, the MIT Muslim Students Association and “other groups”): “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum. Science arose under particular circumstances in the West with certain philosophical presumptions about the nature of reality. As soon as you say, m, f, v, and a, that is, the simple parameters of classical physics, you have chosen to look at reality from a certain point of view. There is no mass, there is no force out there like that chair or table. These are particularly abstract concepts which grew in the seventeenth century on the basis of a particular concept of space, matter and motion which Newton developed. The historians and philosophers of science in the last twenty [or] thirty years have shown beyond the scepter of doubt that modern science has its own world view. It is not at all value free; nor is it a purely objective science of reality irrespective of the subject you study. It is based upon the imposition of certain categories upon the study of nature, with a remarkable success in the study of certain things, and also a remarkable lack of success [in others], depending on what you are looking at.”

Klevius: Listen to this utter crap! “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum”. Two cardinal flaws in just twelve words! Does this muslim fella also believe that "the Western interpretation" 2+2=4 has a corresponding Sharia compliant islamic version?! The choice to look at reality from a certain point of view isn't science, just like what you choose to do with your power tool isn't the power tool!

OK, science doesn’t have its own world-view, that’s for sure. If it had it wouldn't be science anymore. This is the very definition of science. Just as Negative Human Rights don’t have a world-view either, simply because they are supposed to protect you from “world-views”.

Science is pure logic* and shouldn’t be confused with the scientific process, i.e. including its non-scientific parts, such as choice of topic, background/pre-understanding etc., and the interpretation of results from the scientific part of the scientific process. Nor should flaws in the scientific process (such as e.g. errors, deliberate or accidental) be blamed on scientific logic. And yes, logic could be described as “a vacuum” just like Negative Human Rights is the eliminating of impositions. Logic that is dependent on a worldview is per definition not logic at all, and Human Rights that are dependent on an ideology/world-view (e.g. Sharia) aren’t (negative, i.e. the basic freedom rights) Human Rights at all.

As Klevius use to put it: Our most holy duty is to NOT fill the freedom Human Rights with anything! You shouldn’t have the positive Sharia “right” to, for example, be raped by your husband; instead you should have the negative right to choose not to have sex. Even a child understands that this latter right doesn't deny you from having sex, only protects you from imposed compulsion. The difference is, as you can see, is mind blowing if you have been raised within an islamic "world-view".

And this is the reason why the islamofascist muslim world organization/Umma, Saudi initiated and based islamofascist OIC with its fanatic Turkish Fuhrer/caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu 1) has abandoned Human Rights and REPLACED THEM WITH SHARIA, and 2) criminalized scrutiny/criticism of islam (the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity) and calls any critical scrutiny "islamophobia" or "defamation of religion".

* as Klevius has explained in Demand for Resources (1992) pure logic is the pointing out of conceptualized deterministic chains (e.g. 2+2=4) in a universe that is deterministic yet chaotic in the sense that our existence-centrism excludes us from "a total, god-like overview" (see Origin of Universe").


Here's what Klevius wrote about "islamic science" a couple of years ago


Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius, or by digging history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open historical "secret" of islam's original fuel: booty, sex and slavery) and due cultural and technological impotency. So when someone talks about "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most people don't check these lies and haven't all read Klevius as yet.







One example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious islamic mass murderer and enslaver (one of the worst known to history - also called the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned and let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.

But BBC, Wikipedia etc. happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)!

The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil and only pope of islam - and needs to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be released and his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task, doesn't it.

It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?






 





Remove rapetivism from islam and you have killed islam!

Don't have an interfaith dialogue with the Devil - you will inevitably loose!


.




.

Monday, January 26, 2015

Klevius question to BBC and their muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Ever thought about why Klevius blog about sex segregation is called Origin of islam?

Acknowledgement: If you want better editing etc. - just donate and it will be fixed faster than Wikipedia - and certainly less biased! You see, believe it or not but Peter Klevius doesn't get support or funds from neither Saudi Arabia, OIC, EU, US, or UN. On the contrary, these are all busy trying to criminalize his defense of Human Rights (yes, in Saudi Arabia it's already equalized with terrorism) - pretty much in line with the Saudi state's sharia verdict on Raef Badawi.

Islam is a parasitic hate crime - the worst the world has ever encountered. And with 1.5 billion muslims trapped in it it is defended at whatever cost - despite the inevitability of its defeat under the Human Rights equality moral logic.

Islamic hate mongering against the "infidel" is islam's excuse for attacking and taking slaves etc. parasitism. It's also the excuse for sex slavery, marital and exmarital sharia rape, oppression of girls/women etc.

You should be ashamed of having politicians dealing with the disgusting Saud dictator family resting their power on Western oil money and evil Wahhabism (aka Salafism i.e. original islam) which doesn't differ at all from that of the Islamic State (aka ISIS, IS etc).

In Peter Klevius series islam tutorials for the ignorant or bigoted hypocrite (which one do you choose Mishal Husain?)


Islam doesn't have a problem - islam is the problem - more than you ever thought!

The reason being that only orthodox islam (aka "extremism") fits all the violent and parasitic parts of the Koran and historical facts. This is why islam's sudden explosion out of the Arabian illiterate Bedouin desert can't be understood without islam's original formula (taken unabridged and without updatings from Klevius 2002 website www.klevius.info):

Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights Islam opposes?!
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
.
Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters still don't understand that the Koran is completely wrong, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
.
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new Muslims as possible.
.
Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
.
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!



"prophet" Mohammad (a fictive figure* applied long after his "death" to symbolize "Allah's " legitimation of Arab parasitism


* According to historian Hugh Kennedy (who is very uncritical of islam) there is not a single official trace of any Mohammad before many decades after his alleged "death".

Islam is the only religion that combines utter racism (the "infidel" that due to islamic hate speech is fair game to be murdered or enslaved) with utter sexism (women seen as a separate and inferior species) in a way that constitutes optimal parasitism.


, Muhammad:

    I have been ordered to fight with the people [sometimes translated as “all men”] till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah.

And then there is Muhammad’s famous command, uttered as he lay on his deathbed: “Let there not be two religions in Arabia.”  And there is this:

    The Last Hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews.  The Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say:  ‘Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;’ but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

Asked … whether he would “visit Israel with a Palestinian visa,” [Egypt’s minister of religious endowments] said: “This is premature.  Let’s wait until it happens.  However, we hope that the words of the Prophet Muhammad will be fulfilled:  Judgment Day will not come before the Muslims fight the Jews[.]


"Moderate" (i.e. naive, ignorant, bigoted, hypocritical etc) muslims feed the growth of islamofascism


Hidaayah Islamic Foundation (Sri Lanka): Everywhere in the Muslim world we are witnessing, the raising of the banner of Tawheed and the revival of the Call to the Qur’an and Sunnah.

All around the Muslim world, we see some Muslims, individually and collectively proclaiming the Call to Tawheed and the return to the Qur’an and Sunnah in the face of opposition by the ‘Saint-worshippers’, `Grave-worshippers`, `the Sufis’ and the ‘Tariqat followers’. These deviant groups all purport or make the false claim to be Ahl us Sunnah wal Jam’aah and label the true callers to The Sunnah as `Wahhabis’

Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab ibn Sulaiman ibn Ali ibn Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Rashid al Tamimi was born in the year 1115 A.H.(1703 C.E.) in ‘Ayina to the north of Riyadh, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the reign of Abdulla ibn Muhammad ibn Hamd ibn Muammar.

He left his native town to perform the Hajj and then proceeded to Madinah. At that time Sheikh Abdullah bin Ibrahim ibn Saif belonging to the progeny of Saif Najdi was chief of the scholars of Madinah. Sheikh Muhammad acquired a good deal of knowledge from him and came to be loved and held in high esteem by his teacher.


However, what really made al Wahhab tick was his scare of European Enlightenment traces of which he experienced during his time in Basra influenced (via Ottoman Turks) by the so called Tulip period (see further down what Klevius wrote 2008 about this).

However, what followed was a repetition of the original islamic formula so that the Wahhab/Saud cooperation resulted in something very similar to what we have seen under the banner of the Islamic State recently.


Compare the following description with what Klevius has written (do note the resemblance with the original islam described by Peter Klevius):

In 1744 Prince Muhammad bin Saud made an agreement with Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab:

    "You (bin Saud) are the settlement's chief and wise man. I (al-Wahhab) want you to grant me an oath that you will perform jihad against the unbelievers. In return you will be leader of the muslim community and I will be leader in religious matters."


 The alliance provided the ideological impetus to Saudi expansion. First conquering Najd, Saud's forces expanded the Salafi influence to most of the present-day territory of Saudi Arabia, eradicating various popular and Shia practices and propagating the doctrines of ʿAbd al-Wahhab


People came in large numbers to the Sheikh, seeking pure knowledge without the adulteration of fables and falsehood. He explained to them the real meaning of “La ilaaha illallah” and its significance. He stressed the importance of the negation of all false deities and the affirmation of Allah and his attributes.

The Sheikh communicated with people of other cities and invited them to accept his call and join his movement in order to eradicate Shirk and all its abominable practices.

Some accepted while others rejected and some even ridiculed him and accused him of sorcery. He continued with his mission undeterred. The opponents exerted their utmost to rally their forces to destroy this nascent movement by any or all means. Sheikh Muhammad and the Prince had no alternative but to resort to the sword to defend this movement. This war went on for many years and village after village fell to the new alliance. Some opponents voluntarily began to accept them when they realized the true nature of the movement.

All the efforts by the misguided group to rally their forces to destroy this nascent movement by any means miserably failed. After the conquest of Riyadh in 1187 A.H. the Sheikh entrusted the governing of the people to Prince Abdul Aziz bin Muhammad bin Saud and devoted his time to worship, learning and teaching. Prince Muhammad and his son Abd al Aziz always consulted him before they undertook anything and he gave his ruling. After an arduous struggle and having reached his goal he passed away in Dhul Qa’dah of 1206.




Muslim hate crimes against Jews (muslim hate crimes against "infidels" are by far the most common hate crimes but we totally lack definite and official figured because these muslim hate crimes are blinked)


Muslim hate crimes against Jews in the world


The most anti-Jewish place is the West Bank and Gaza, where 93 percent of people held anti-Jewish beliefs, followed by Iraq, Yemen, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan and Morocco. Saudi Arabia we have no reliable figures on but they might even be higher than in the West Bank and Gaza.

Muslim hate crimes against Jews in the US


Although almost two-thirds of religion-based hate crimes in 2012 in the US were committed against Jews and although the majority of these hate attacks stem from islam this is how a Jew who tries to point it out is treated:


In other words, when muslims attack Jews it's not anti- Jewish but anti-muslim!

According to US Ambassador Samantha Power, anti-Semitism is an increasing domestic concern in the US and cited statistics from an FBI report, revealing that almost two-thirds of religion-based crimes in 2012 were committed against Jews.

Muslim hate crimes against Jews in Sweden


Malmö, Sweden's third city with a big muslim population, has for many years been the most dangerous place for Jews. However, Thomas Bull, coordinator at the hate crime section of Malmö police says 'I don't believe Malmö is worse when it comes to hate crimes'. Only after some reporters disguised as Jews showed him the muslim atrocities they encountered he changed his mind: 'It might be harder for Jews to show their attributes here than I previously thought.' However, the question remains: Why is the coordinator of hate crimes in Sweden's most anti-Jewish city not aware of it when almost every other Swede knows it?!


Saudi Arabia - the cradle of muslim evil


Religious freedom "does not exist" in Saudi Arabia. Islam is the official religion of Saudi Arabia, and the tenets of that religion are enforced by law.

Antisemitsm is common within religious circles. Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais, the imam of the Grand mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, has been described as an antisemite for publicly praying to God to 'terminate' the Jews

Saudi Arabian media often attacks Jews in books, news articles, at their Mosques and with what some describe as antisemitic satire. Saudi Arabian government officials and state religious leaders often promote the idea that Jews are conspiring to take over the entire world; as proof of their claims they publish and frequently cite The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as factual.

One Saudi Arabian government newspaper suggested that hatred of all Jews is justifiable. "Why are they (the Jews) hated by all the people which hosted them, such as Iraq and Egypt thousands years ago, and Germany, Spain, France and the UK, up to the days they gained of power over the capital and the press, in order to rewrite the history?"

Saudi textbooks vilify Jews (and Christians and non-Wahabi Muslims): according to The Washington Post, Saudi textbooks claimed by them to have been sanitized of antisemitism still call Jews apes (and Christians swine); demand that students avoid and not befriend Jews; claim that Jews worship the devil; and encourage Muslims to engage in Jihad to vanquish Jews.

Even during the height of the Saudi crackdown on extremism in 2004, a Saudi IQRA TV "man on the street" segment on feelings toward Jews, was entirely antagonistic. Interviewees described Jews as "our eternal enemies", "murderous", "the enemies of Allah and His Prophet," "murderers of prophets," "the filthiest people on the face of this earth", etc.


What Klevius has said about Abd al-Wahhab the father of Saudi islamofascism (2008) plus what yo won't find on Wikipedia:



The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness and as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, and which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology and rationality rather than on religious superstition and fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage and the idea about negative human rights.

* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, hateful, racist and sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred and more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness and, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca and Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil and made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.

(analysis taken from Homo Filius Nullius by Peter Klevius).

Klevius comment: And today this evilness threatens the free world through spineless politicians and UN! The banner of Enlightenment is now upheld by heroic women, e.g. African Ayaan Hirsi Ali who has suffered as a victim of islam(ofascism) and escaped to the West, only to find that she was abandoned by those she thought would protect her! In fact, Western politicians and media are busy implementing that very Arab-islamic oppression so many muslims have escaped!


Saying islam is "a great religion" is a grave insult to secularism* and secularized religions


* No religious or other superstitious and spiritual basis for legislation etc. The only guidance for legislation is the most basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992). Add to this the so called negative rights, i.e. freedom from impositions. Read Klevius important definition of Negative Human Rights. It's been on the web since 2002 but somehow you might have missed this most educational page you can find re. Human Rights! And if you understand it you either give up your Human Rights violating racism/sexism - or admit that you really are a hateful racist.


Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians (not to mention muslim organizations) again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims.
 


BBC got one more muslim presenter, Mishal Husain, yet uses non muslim presenters to talk about the most important muslim news! Why? Is it to protect her fantasy "Euro-muslim" virginity"?!


When the islamofascist Saudi dictator and "guardian of islam" died Mishal Husain was silent about it and rather talked about prince Andrew's alleged sex with a minor prostitute.


While pious orthodox muslims chase Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that as a muslim she thinks that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, is misguided’. Well Mishal please, what you have in your individual head has nothing to do with collective islam where you count as one of the more than a Billion muslims who via their muslimhood sanction OIC's Human Rights violating islamofascism!


However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.

Why do you let your politicians keep licking the most evil dictator family on Earth?!


Saudi Arabia and islam - the Human Rights violating sharia curse (incl. street jihad in the West) of the world

Not since the German National socialists has the world seen such an apparent pure evil as what the Saudis (+accomplices) have produced by the help of oil money and the most hateful of ideologies. The Saudis have been behind most major terrorist attacks incl 9/11, Iraq (most atrocities since Bush's speedy victory over Saddam), Libya, Egypt, Syria, Russia, UK etc around the world; OIC, the islamofascist organization against Human Rights is based in Saudi Arabia and its Fuhrer is a Saudi named Iyad Madani; Saudi Arabia is the center of muslim racism and intolerance; the Saudis have deliberately covered with concrete and various constructions all sites that could reveal the total lack of archaeological evidence about the islamic myths. And on and on!


Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Islam has always been used for evil. Why? Because it's originally made as a tool for evil!


 There was never a good Nationalsocialim (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.

Nazi German, Saudi Arabiay and islamist Turkey - no freedom of speech!





Excerpts from OIC's sharia declaration sanctioned by UN


ARTICLE 24:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.


ARTICLE 25:
The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius: This declaration is the real muslim problem because it constitutes islam of today. This is also the reason why BBC and its muslim sharia presenter try hard to keep ordinart Brits and others unaware of this disgusting hate declaration











.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Why doesn't BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain comment on her Saudi muslim sharia caliph's death?!

.

Saying islam is "a great religion" is a grave insult to secularism* and secularized religions


* No religious or other superstitious and spiritual basis for legislation etc. The only guidance for legislation is the most basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992). Add to this the so called negative rights, i.e. freedom from impositions. Read Klevius important definition of Negative Human Rights. It's been on the web since 2002 but somehow you might have missed this most educational page you can find re. Human Rights! And if you understand it you either give up your Human Rights violating racism/sexism - or admit that you really are a hateful racist.


Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims.
 


BBC got one more muslim presenter, Mishal Husain, yet uses non muslim presenters to talk about the most important muslim news! Why?



When the islamofascist Saudi dictator and "guardian of islam" died Mishal Husain was silent about it and rather talked about prince Andrew's alleged sex with a minor prostitute.





While islamofascism chases Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that as a muslim she thinks that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, is misguided’.


However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.
 
Yet BBC manages today to:


1  Call the world's most intolerant dictator - who even on his death bed asked for more Human Rights violating sharia - a 'cautious reformer'!



2 When interviewing terrorist experts trying to belittle the Saudi connection to the Islamic State (which has a huge support among Saudis) while instead trying to emphasize the Shia threat which has a much less support within Saudi Arabia.


3  Not with a word touching the subject of worldwide Saudi sponsored jihadist hate crimes around the world. "king" Abdullah was the main culprit behind this hate mongering.


4  The fact that his follower is, at least equally keen to violate Human Rights with islamofascist sharia.



5  The fact that the Saudi family steers all muslims world Umma via its Jeddah based OIC organization.



Is it just Klevius who thinks these would have been topics of interest for British license fee paying listeners?



Every true* muslim is a Human Rights violator

* I.e. follower/supporter of OIC's Human Rights violating sharia.





Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani  - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


There was never a good Nationalsocialim (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.

Nazi German, Saudi Arabiay and islamist Turkey - no freedom of speech!




Excerpts from OIC's sharia declaration sanctioned by UN


ARTICLE 24:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.


ARTICLE 25:
The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius: This declaration is the real muslim problem because it constitutes islam of today. This is also the reason why BBC and its muslim sharia presenter try hard to keep ordinart Brits and others unaware of this disgusting hate declaration.



.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia* presenter Mishal Husain: Why don't you report more about muslim hate attacks on Jews?!


Islamofascists take down main Jewish news website 

 
Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims.


While islamofascism chases Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, I find misguided’.







* However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

 A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.
 

Every true muslim is a Human Rights violator


Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani  - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


There was never a good Nationalsocialim (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.


FREE SPEECH FOES SHUT DOWN PAMELA GELLER'S ANTI-JIHAD WEBSITE


01-20-2015 12:51 am - Pamela Geller
Anti-free speech thugs are at it again. My website, Atlas Shrugs (PamelaGeller.com), was taken down by a massive DDoS attack last Thursday, and as of this writing on Sunday afternoon, the attack is still metastasizing. This attack is unprecedented in its size and scope. Jihadis and their leftist errand boys are so desperate to silence me and my message that they have devoted tremendous resources to taking down my site, which is devoted to honest news reporting about jihad activity.

Leftists and Islamic supremacists do this on all fronts. On Saturday, I organized a rally against an anti-free speech Islamic conference, and the leftists were in lockstep, goosestep, with the Islamic supremacists – as the media coverage from leftist outlets demonstrated.

My site host, Media Temple, said they couldn’t cope with the attack against my site. They had never in their history seen anything like it. The DDoS attack didn’t just take down my site. It also took down Media Temple and threatened all of their clients, and even attacked the servers that Media Temple uses at Net Data Center, a service provider that promises “uninterrupted operations.” Net Data Center could not handle the massive traffic that the attackers were sending to my site to take it down, and finally had to pull the plug on Atlas Shrugs.

The timing was noteworthy. Our ads calling attention to Islamic Jew-hatred in San Francisco have gotten an immense amount of national and international press. And above all, our free speech rally last Saturday to counter the “Stand with the Prophet” anti-free speech conference in Garland, Texas, got the foes of freedom riled.

Leaders of the Muslim community in America held their “Stand with the Prophet” conference in Garland, in support of Muhammad and the restriction of “Islamophobic” speech – working for the same goal as that which was held by those who killed 12 people at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris last week: the punishment of criticism of Islam and Muhammad, including even examinations of the motives and goals of terrorists.

The event featured:

John Esposito, head of the Saudi-funded Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown; and

Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and close friend of the mastermind of that bombing, the “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel Rahman.

Saturday’s “Stand with the Prophet” event sought to combat “Islamophobes in America” – including me. This is in line with Islamic supremacist groups’ longstanding objective of defaming, smearing and marginalizing anyone who opposes the jihad agenda. They said they wanted to defend Muhammad – which means to silence those who notice that defenders of Muhammad just murdered 16 people in Paris and tens of thousands worldwide since 9/11.

Nevertheless, the superintendent of schools allowed this anti-American group to hold this conference agitating for an abridgment of the First Amendment – despite the mass slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo staff for violating the draconian Shariah blasphemy laws, mandating death for criticism of Islam. The Islamic law restricting free speech has no place in the American public sphere. It is anathema to the principles upon which this great nation was established.

But we were unbowed. Saturday in Garland, Texas, thousands of freedom-loving Americans took a stand for the freedom of speech. Block after block, row after row, Texan after Texan, American after American, said no to the restrictions against free speech as mandated under Islamic law (Shariah).

The rally was an enormous success. Thousands of Americans joined us in Garland, Texas, to oppose the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the earth, Islamic law (Shariah). They demonstrated their indomitable commitment to freedom. We will never give in, and never submit, and never be subjugated.

The media coverage of our rally was vicious, ugly and dishonest. It’s extraordinary in the wake of the Paris jihad attack, where journalists were mercilessly slaughtered in cold blood, that journalists are covering and advancing the most extreme and brutal ideology on the face of the earth. The jihadists screamed in the streets (while making a Nazi salute, by the way), “We have avenged the prophet.”

This conference was the same kind of initiative: It was called “Stand with the Prophet.” And what did the media call it? A “peace conference.” One headline blared, “Muslims group gathers for peace, faces threats, protest.” And the news story features only smiling young women wearing hijabs.

This coverage, the “Stand with the Prophet” conference and the attack on my site are all part of the same anti-free speech initiative. The Islamic supremacists are out for blood, determined to criminalize criticism of Islam (and opposition to jihad terror) under the guise of fighting against “Islamophobia” and “hate speech.” The media cover for them. And on the eve of their “Stand with the Prophet” event, their fellow foes of free speech took my site down.

My website reaches close to 100,000 readers a day. No wonder they want so very much to take it down and keep it down. Our rally, like my website, stood for the freedom of speech against all attempts, violent and stealthy, to impose Islamic blasphemy laws on Americans and stifle criticism of Muhammad and Islam. As Muhammad’s followers kill more and more people, we need critics of him more than ever – and free people need to stand up against these underhanded attempts to stifle all criticism of Islam, including honest investigations of how jihadists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify Jew-hatred, violence, supremacism and oppression.

The foes of free speech never give up. And neither should its defenders. As of this writing, the DDoS attack against my website continues, and there is no end in sight. I am working furiously to move the site and get back online. The costs associated with the move, the server, and the IT expertise are staggering. You can rest assured that I’ll be back online – with a righteous vengeance.

We need to get the message out and cover the news the media won’t cover – especially now when the jihad is raging. I need your help. If you believe that Atlas Shrugs must survive


Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Saudi based OIC (all muslims Ummah organization via UN) and its islamofascist* Fuhrer Iyad Madani: Violent? Me? Just trying to sharia punish Charlie Hebdo!


* The original UN Human Rights declaration from 1948 was meant to be a final bulwark against fascism. However, by calling Human Rights violating sharia "islamic human rights" and by the help of a bunch of Human Rights violating muslim member states, the Saudis managed to bypass this bulwark and can now in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way argue that they follow "human rights" when they in fact do the very opposite!

Dear reader, it's Charlie Hebdo, Raif Badawi and (to a lesser extent) Peter Klevius with the Human Rights sword against Saudi oil Billionaires and their sharia scimitar. Whose side are YOU on?! Should Charlie Hebdo be prosecuted in accordance with islamofascist sharia?


Charles Martel was the guy who 732 saved France from muslim jihadist "crusades". 

Is OIC now shooting itself in the foot? Or will it again be aided by Western PC politicians?


Saudi Secretary General of Saudi based OIC, Iyad Madani (member of the dictator "house" of Saud): The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) intends to take legal measures against the French magazine, Charlie Hebdo, for publishing "blasphemous" (according to sharia) cartoons. OIC is studying Europe and French laws and "other available procedures" (UN?) to be able to take legal action against Charlie Hebdo. If French laws allow us to take legal procedures against Charlie Hebdo, OIC will not hesitate to prosecute the French magazine. This publication by Charlie Hebdo requires necessary legal measures (to comply with Human Rights violating muslim sharia). These cartoons have hurt the sentiments of muslims across the world. This is hate speech (according to Human Rights violating sharia) and must not offend others.

Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia presenter: What do you make of it? Are your "sentiments" hurt, and dou you also think Charlie Hebdo people need more suffering? BBC and you seem to be totally unaware (see screendumps below) of this Saudi islamofascist  threat. Luckily you have Klevius to help you in your heavy task of informing about really essential news.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo



Charlie Hebdo's editor-in-chief Gérard Biard: "We do not attack religion, but we do when it gets involved in politics. If God becomes entangled in politics, then democracy is in danger. Some of Charlie Hebdo's staff members are religious, but choose not to be offended. To be a believer is a personal choice that concerns no one else. We respect that, in the same way that we respect a person's private life as long as the individual does not bring his or her private life into the public sphere.



Klevius: So what does UK's OIC loving muslim sharia Minister of faith islamofascism, Sayeeda Warsi make of it? Declaring the British parliament "islamophobic"?!





Here some screen dumps of 20 Jan 2015. As you can see, BBC seems quite uniterested in the OIC/Madani issue:




No surprise here.



.