Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japanese space robot 10 yrs before Rosetta

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Friday, August 28, 2015

BBC presenter David Olusoga defends islam's atrocities and betilttles the abolishment movement etc. For how long still will Bush be accused for 1400 years of islamic evil?


No matter if these victims were muslims or non-muslims - it was the consequences of the ideology of islam (sharia islam* or islamofascism as Klevius prefers to call it) they tried to escape!

* All true islam is exactly the same as "sharia islam" but due to the perverted political climate of today (islamophilia) where a non-existing fantasy "islam" is also called islam, it may be beneficial for Human Rights defenders (aka "islamophobes") like Klevius to explain that 'sharia islam' means that very islam that is incompatible with the most basic of Universal Human Rights. Compare the disgusting Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC's sharia declaration which defines islam via UN and which is aimed for all muslims in the world. If you don't share this original islam but still want to call yourself a muslim, fine, but then honestly express yourself clearly on precisely this point - knowing you then commit the worst crime known to islam, namely apostasy! If you keep silent then you are definitely complicit to prolonging the suffering of islam's victims.

It's a weird but common habit to excuse sharia islamic atrocities by calling it "in the name of islam". You don't say Germans committed atrocities "in the name of National-socialism" (aka Nazism), do you.


BBC presenter, David Olusoga, who defends islamic slavery throughout 1400 years, is the best support for islamofascists they can ever get.







Religious superiority motivated and "justified" the muslim Arabs' destruction of most of Africa throughout 1400 years and left the continent in backwardness and misery - not to mention the biggest scale of human suffering caused by any ideology on the planet. However, somehow BBC's David Olusoga manages to blindfold himself with a highly idealized picture when it comes to the worst and most elaborated slave ideology that has ever existed on the planet.

David Olusoga, Nigeria born BBC presenter: Islamic slavery was different from slavery in the West. What you get in the islamic world is enslaved people rising out of slavery into positions of power, sometimes military power. The slave wives of important men were on occasions able to become extremely powerful people, so you haven’t got the situation as in the Americas where to be black is to be a slave and to have little chance of rising out of that status.

Klevius: What a pile of dung - makes Klevius puke! So "occasional" success stories would justify the possibly many hundreds of millions suffering and dying because they didn't know Arabic (the only language Allah accepted) and therefore were "infidels" and could be taken as slaves or just raped and/or slaughtered! Not to mention islam's really creepy definitions of "islam being attacked" and "jihad defense", which makes it possible for any muslim to argue that islam "is under attack" as long as there are non-muslims not accepting islam.



The Arab/islamic slave trade was religiously "justified". If a non-muslim population refuses to pay the jizya protection/subjugation tax (aka extortion or robbery), that population is considered to be at war with the muslim "ummah" (nation), and it becomes legal under sharia to take slaves from that non-muslim population. Moreover, muslims didn't proselytize because of its effect in reducing the potential reservoir of slaves (compare "no compulsion in religion").

The Arab muslim slave raiding/trading originated in old Jewish slave trade routes. However, with Arab(ic) islam this kind of parasitism became much more elaborated in religious texts. This included a muslim rapetivism that put the muslim Penis as the determinant for children to become muslims. So they were made muslim from birth and stopped from becoming non-muslims later on via the draconian apostasy rule. And unlike Jewish matrilineality, in islam the status of the Vagina has no bearing whatsoever - it's always the Penis that rules.

To meet the muslim demand for plantation labor, African slaves (Zanj) were forcefully taken in millions to the Arabian peninsula and the Near East, among other areas.

Islam originated in the bloody enslavement campaign by Abu Bakr who became the first muslim caliph over the firtst islamic caliphate. As seen on the map below its Northern part followed almost exactly the campaign by its modern successor, the Saudi sponsored Islamic State, led by Abu Bakr Baghdadi (sic) aka Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim Ali al-Badri al-Samarrai.



The world's biggest slave mosque, Samarra in Iraq, was at the center of the 9th century slave rebellion.


Islam's mosques, already more than 1,000 years ago, constituted the center for the worst slave finance the world had ever experienced - and it got worse!


Already more than thousand years ago in what is now Iraq, some 500,000 African Zanj slaves started a rebellion against their muslim masters! It gives a hint of the scale of muslim sharia slave finance based on "infidel" racism - which is clearly also sanctioned in the Koran. In fact, it's the very root and origin of islam - together with the first caravan robbings and water hole "conquests" until the muslim criminals had collected enough big gangs to be called some sort of "armies" under the spell of islamic hate supremacist ideology!

The Zanj Rebellion or the Negro Rebellion took place near the city of Basra, located in present-day southern Iraq, over a period of fifteen years (869−883 AD). The insurrection is believed to have involved enslaved Black Africans (Zanj) that had originally been captured from the African Great Lakes region and areas further south in East Africa. It grew to involve over 500,000 slaves who were imported from across the muslim empire and claimed over "tens of thousands of lives in lower Iraq" - i.e. actually smaller numbers than today's islamic campaign in Iraq.

David Olusoga, Nigeria born BBC presenter: There is a different approach to race in the sense that slavery was not regarded as a category only applicable to one race: it was a status defined by the law and by religion.

Klevius: Would you believe this pathetic nonsense! Only Arabs (i.e. someone speaking Arabic) were true muslims and Allah spoke only Arabic (here's a clue to the strange position of Persian Shia "muslims").

David Olusoga's delusion about islamic slavery constitutes spitting in the face of islam's victims in a similar way as Holocaust deniers do.

.











.

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

How many muslims are extremists comparable with German Nazis? The very showing the question got Curt Schilling sacked! Luckily he wasn't in Saudi Arabia.


Acknowledgement: Islam is here seen as sharia islam i.e. violating the most basic Human Rights, and true muslims are here seen as those who follow this political islam.

 Listening to islam supporters it sound like the more muslims in the world the more sensitive they are and the more understanding and (sharia) compliant we non-muslims ought to be. So truly small minorities must be very strong and hardy then, and can be more easily kicked around. Comes handy for them as they might need their hardiness much more than muslims who can be legally "offended" or "hated" for things no one would even dream of affecting average non-muslims.




 UK's possible PM didn't remember the islamofascist sharia muslim he had invited and sat beside. Worrying? Possibly. But more worrying still is his support for islamofascist blasphemy laws and his racist rant against Human Rights defenders (so called "islamophobes").

How do Jeremy Corbyn's (the socialist who, like Erdogan, thinks islam critics, i.e. so called "islamophobes", are the most "disgusting of terrorists") Jew hating muslim friends fit in the picture?

So what do those "muslims" think who don't approve of sharia but rather stick with Human Rights? And Jews who don't want to submit under islam. Should we just allow spineless bigoted hypocrite politicians like Jeremy Corbyn to assist in their extermination.





Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"


 Curt Schilling, a former star base ball pitcher and a baseball analyst for ESPN, was suspended from his Little League World Series duty after sending a tweet which re-posted a meme that reads: "It's said only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940, only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How'd that go?"

The text was superimposed of a red-tinted photo of Adolf Hitler.


Schilling added, "The math is staggering when you get to true #'s."



Schilling also shared the photo on Facebook, where the original post links to a video about the end times.

At first Schilling didn't back off from his post, but eventually he was forced to say it was wrong to post the meme.

"I understand and accept my suspension. 100% my fault. Bad choices have bad consequences and this was a bad decision in every way on my part," he wrote.

"Curt's tweet was completely unacceptable, and in no way represents our company's perspective," ESPN said in a written statement. "We made that point very strongly to Curt and have removed him from his current Little League assignment pending further consideration."

Schilling deleted the tweet after individually replying to some of his critics and supporters.

In one he wrote, "needed to actually think a bit before acting on that one, or not acting. On me though."


Klevius comment: More than one third of the Germans who voted voted for the National-socialists (aka Nazis). Later almost all Germans who voted voted in favor of giving Hitler and the National-socialists (aka Nazis) sole leadership for the purpose of hindering splitting party politics at a time of rebuilding the country and its economy.

At least 234,000 UK muslims have a "very favorable" or "somewhat favorable" view on the Islamic State!


Today (2015) approximately 78,000* UK muslims have a "very favorable" view on the Islamic State while some 156,000 have a "somewhat favorable" view. 

* Cautiously estimated on 2.6 million adult UK muslims (2011 census). 


The 25 Points of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (aka "Nazi") programme here compared to islam:


Klevius showed this program to his former* friend Max Scharnberg (a Freud critic like Klevius) after having deleted the parts were Jews and Germans/Germany etc. clear hints were mentioned. Klevius then asked which party program Max thought it could be. Max answered without any hesitation that he thought it was a social-democratic party program.

* Klevius stopped seeing the guy after Max said he could perform suicide attacks against Jews was it not for him being to cowardice to perform it.

        1. We demand the union of all Germans (muslims) in a Great Germany (Ummah) on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples (muslims).

        2. We demand that the German people (muslims) have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated (Palestine/Zionism).

        3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.

        4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen (muslims) can become citizens. Only those who have German blood (are muslims), regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew (or "infidel") can be a countryman.

        5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany (Ummah) as foreigners (dhimmis) and must be subject to the law of aliens (sharia).

        6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens (to the caliph). We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen (muslim).

        We wage war (jihad) against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness.

        7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen (muslim) shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens ("infidels") must be expelled.

        8. Any further immigration of non-Germans ("infidels", Jews, "wrong-muslims" Christians, Atheists etc)) must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans (infidels) who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave (compare Saudi Arabia's laws against "infidels", Human Rights etc).

        9. All citizens must possess equal rights and duties.

        10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically (this may not apply to an ideology based on parasitism). No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.

        Therefore we demand:

        11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished (this may not apply to an ideology based on parasitism).

        12. Since every war (jihad) imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

        13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

        14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.

        15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.

        16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.

        17. We demand an agrarian (well, the origin of islam was as far from agrarian you can get) reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land (this seems to be as far from "right-wing" you can get).

        18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.

        19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law (sharia).

        20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German (muslim) to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural (religious) system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life (sharia). The conception of the State Idea (Ummah) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.

        21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.

        22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (jihad) folk army.

        23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those ("islamophobes") who propagate deliberate political (religious) lies and disseminate them through the press (blasphemy). In order to make possible the creation of a German (muslim) press, we demand:

        (a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German (Arabic) language shall be German citizens (Sunni muslims).

        (b) Non-German (infidel) newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State (Caliph or his representatives). They must not be published in the German (Arabic) language.

        (c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German (Sunni muslim) newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans (infidels) by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans (infidel).

        Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare (of the Ummah) shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature (Muhammad caricatures, caricatures of the Saudi dictator family etc) that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk (muslims), and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.

        24. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state (doubtful if this applies to islam in Saudi Arabia - the "custodian of islam"), insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race (Sunni muslims).

        The party (OIC) as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity (islam) without binding itself to any one particular confession (doesn't apply in islamic monotheism). It fights against the Jewish materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the pinciple:

        COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD

        25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State (Caliphate), the unconditional authority (submission) by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.

        The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws (sharia) promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states.

        The leaders of the party (OIC) undertake to promote the execution of the foregoing points at all costs, if necessary at the sacrifice of their own lives (may not apply to OIC).
  



The islam Klevius talks about is the one that leaves Human Rights violations,  rapes, blood, suffering and death behind itself. I.e. the very same islam and its consequences that BBC describes as "motivated" by "islamophobia" and "injustice" against muslim jihads. 


Islam was/is evil parasitism - i.e. not something "pure" completely disconnected from humans! Its main expressions today are OIC (UN) and the Islamic State (violence).

They both work for sharia against Human Rights



OIC Fuhrer Iyad Madani and the caliph of the Islamic State



Rapetivism is the foundation and pillar of monotheism



It’s not surprising that the mix of piety and depravity that characterizes this movement would emanate from the soul of its founder. But the followers aren't without guilt either.

OIC's and Islamic State's muslim Umma:


 Islamic state is establishing itself in Europe via Balkan and those very parts that the West opened up for Saudi infiltration.


Islamic State inspired camps in the US




 .
Klevius wrote:

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Klevius history tutorial on the deep perversity of Judaic monotheisms: The chosen people (racism); the genitally mutilated children (abuse); sex apartheid (sexism); and the slave economy


Dear fellow Atheists! You constitute the biggest ideological group on Earth - yet we hear almost nothing about it! Consider all these pompous and extremely racist "monotheist god" agitators whose voices are sprayed all over society without anyone even reflecting over how deeply offending and degrading they are against Atheists, Buddhists, Shintoists etc etc! No, we don't need more religion, we need less. And "freedom of religion" should only be understood as having the right to believe in whatever, yet not having the right to impose it on others. (Negative) Human Rights is pure freedom without imposition. Religion is racism.

Btw, if a random muslim has the right not to serve you because of your beliefs (in atheism, music, wine, pork, dogs or whatever) you should have the right to demand not to be served by muslims at all!

The true history of God - sorry about that, Karen Armstrong


There never was any space for a "first mover". Space has only one dimension (in this context) and that dimension is 'now'. No beginning, no end, just now. Read your Einstein and try to understand the word 'relativity' when gazing the stars. What you (and Hubble) see is 'now'! "Big bang" was invented by a Catholic priest to make "creation" sound cooler. Silly, isn't it! Where should it bang? In front of God? A muslim suicide bomber can't see the bang and the suffering it causes around her/him because s/he is in it.

In a constantly changing world there can never be a "moral base" other than the basis for Human Rights, i.e. that all should be treated as equals - just as in traffic. Not even leftists are offended by giving way for those coming from the right.

God people always (and usually after much resistance, trouble and suffering) have to eventually give up or reform alter their holy hollow tenets - no matter if we're talking gay rights, women's rights, or whatever.

Atheism is the only straight way to Human Rights!


God has always been against Human Rights - that's his very allurement!


The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to proto-Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims. Btw, English is a Scandinavian language and e.g. 'cottage' is a direct derivative from Finnish 'koti' - funny spelling though, especially compared to Finnish which is spelled exactly as it is pronounced).


Origin of islam, a late Judaic sect, focusing on enslavement of others, that became the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity


Racist monotheism is never good for your moral. How could it possibly be when you tell individuals that their "god" is superior, hence ending up with millions of private "gods" which are then said to be one in collectives defined by this "communal god" which only exists through its political and militaristic expressions.


The true history about the Judaic Penis oppression of the Vagina people


From Sumerian genderless pronouns to Semitic sex apartheid


For most of today's speakers of Indo-European languages the he/she devision seems almost self-evident - until they learn Finnish, Japanese, Mandarin or some other non-Semitic and non later Indo-European languages.

Moreover, linguistic gender divide in third person singular is a relatively recent phenomenon in the history of human languages. It first emerged within Semitic languages. We can only speculate why, but a qualified guess by Klevius would connect it to the same social and environmental factors that caused Judaism.

The civilization process in the Middle east was introduced by the non-Semitic Sumerians. However, when Semitic groups attacked, dissolved and displaced them, a pattern emerged whereby non-Semitic Indo-European related groups begun assimilating a gender divide in third person singular.

Originally, there were only an animate (masculine/feminine) and an inanimate (neuter) gender. This view is supported by the existence of certain classes of Latin and Ancient Greek adjectives which inflect only for two sets of endings, one for masculine and feminine, the other for neuter. Further evidence comes from the Anatolian languages which exhibit only the animate and the inanimate gender.


Judaism, the world’s only “monotheism” and its many Vagina/Penis branches or sects


The Jewish  slave Kingdom of Chazars, in what is now Southern Russia, was one of the absolutely worst slave trading societies - only beaten by islamic caliphates and sultanates (read more on Origin of the Vikings).


Judaism (a late ”branch” of Zoroastrianism) has in different manifestations cursed itself and the world for some Millenniums. It was chiseled out on the bedrock of a racist “chosen people” and sexist rapetivism (i.e. female sex duties) approach. However, a crucial moment was when a particular branch of Judaism introduced the Penis as the sole custodian of one way (apostasy ban) “muslimhood”. This caused an explosion of “muslims”, although this development was paralleled with an even bigger explosion of abused slaves and parasitism in a variety of forms. But the real corner stone of all Judaic tradition, sex apartheid, has reached its peak in islam. To an extent that it now has clashed against Human Rights resulting in a divided UN.  


Look wherever you like now or in the past, and you won't find any peace or equality where Judaic monotheisms have left their marks. 

If anything at all should be taught to our children about religion  it should be its racist and sexist origin and its disastrous consequences!

The only people chosen by the only god - a bedrock formula for sectarianism and disaster - not the least for themselves










.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Klevius hint to UK Labour: Skip your "islamophobia" campaign against critics of islamofascism - and clean your party from islamofascists and their supporters (like Jeremy Corbyn)!


"Islamophobia" or islamofascism?


Of course Labour won't let go of their ties to islamofascism. And that's kind of good because it will alienate British voters even more from this disgusting state party which talks a lot about "vulnerable people" when asking for tax-money, while forgetting all about these "vulnerable people" when it comes to consuming said money (read Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis).

Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'.

Klevius: Boris Johnson fulfills the most basic definition of "islamophobia" because islam without sharia is no longer islam! Welcome Boris to Klevius club.


Jeremy Corbyn acts "offended" for being called racist. Yet he's both openly and covertly racist against Human Rights defenders (i.e. most ordinary Brits) almost every day!


Here Jeremy Corbyn sits together with an islamofascist called Dyab Abou Jahjah whom he afterwards said to BBC he had never heard about.


Samuel Westrop: In 2012, Corbyn agreed to speak at a Ramadan celebration with Abdur Raheem Green, a Salafist preacher who has spoken of a "Yehudi [Jewish] ... stench." Green urges Muslims to "push them [Jews] to the side." In addition, Green encourages men to hit their wives to "bring them to goodness," and has called for the killing of homosexuals and adulterers.

In 2014, Corbyn spoke at an event organized by representatives of the Iranian regime, to commemorate the Iranian revolution of 1979. Corbyn's fellow speakers included Hassan al-Sadr, who represents the UK office of Iraqi terrorist Moqtada al-Sadr; and Abdolhossein Moezi, the personal representative of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Also in 2014, Corbyn hosted an event in parliament that featured the "neo-Nazi" speaker James Thring, who has appeared in a revisionist pro-Nazi documentary and has said that, "the Jewish lobby has so much power."

In the wake of Britain's general election, candidates with ties to anti-Semitic extremists and terror groups are standing for important political positions.


Klevius micro tutorial on the origin of islam: 


The early muslim conquest plundering expeditions consisted of greedy and horny illiterate teenage bedouin boys led by wealthy Jewish/Christians whose way (islam) of recruiting and feeding them via parasitism is a copy of what the Islamic State does today (plus of course today also young muslim women who due to the sex apartheid they have been kept in feel important when serving as sex objects for jihadis and assisting in murdering, torturing, enslaving and raping of "infidel women etc).

Young muslim male asylum migrants coming alone as "child-refugees" to spread sharia islam. Where are the women? Here!


The only muslim women "refugees" are those pregnant or with kids or already married (sharia marriage). So new muslim mothers are usually taken from non-muslims. Moreover, muslim women aren't even allowed, according to sharia, to date or marry non-muslims.



Muslim women in UK have four times more kids than non-muslims. Yet BBC keeps demonizing non-muslim EU migrants, Chinese etc.



"Islamophobic" math based on Human Rightsphobic islam



Most muslims who come as "refugees" are in fact from wealthy middle class, and should therefore be classified as "economical or benefit migrants". The poorer ones could never afford to pay for the travel. Why isn't this cruel fact on Labour's agenda?! The islamic pattern of today is exactly the same as when early muslim jihadis made wealthy non-muslims pay taxes while slaughtering, raping and enslaving the poorer ones. Klevius thinks it's disgusting. What do you reckon, Jeremy Corbyn? "Islamophobia" more disgusting, right.


Swedish asylum muslim migrant stats (it's probably similar elsewhere):




Of these "coming alone child-refugees" most are muslims. 90% are teenage boys and most of these are late teenage youngsters.

According to islam a child fathered by a muslim is always a muslim no matter who the mother is.

So it's not only that muslim mothers have many more children than non-muslim Europeans - non-muslim mothers having children with muslim men inevitably loose their children to islam.




 In Klevius series digusting Human Rights desecrating hypocritical politicians.





Raed Salah (a friend of Jeremy Corbyn): Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.

Klevius: And most of them are muslim violators of Human Rights! If we don't start educating muslims about Human Rights instead of lying to our children about islam, then these future Muhammads and Muslimas will never understand the very evil origin and nature of Human Rights violating sharia islam.




So what to do?

Simple. Most muslims have a brain and understand logic. So face them with Human Rights logic according to which their system is racist and sexist. Most of these young males will probably abandon sharia islam if seriously challenged at all societal levels with the illogic of this supremacist ideology. And those who don't, then clearly define themselves as hateful and racist supremacists.


UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".


Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam. 

* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).



Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association


Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.

But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”

Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.

In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.

Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.







.

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Young muslim male asylum migrants coming alone as "child-refugees" to spread sharia islam. Where are the women? Here!


"Islamophobic" math based on Human Rightsphobic islam


Swedish asylum muslim migrant stats



Of these "coming alone child-refugees" most are muslims. 90% are teenage boys and most of these are late teenage youngsters.

According to islam a child fathered by a muslim is always a muslim no matter who the mother is.

So it's not only that muslim mothers have many more children than non-muslim Europeans - non-muslim mothers having children with muslim men inevitably loose their children to islam.


So what to do?

Simple. Most muslims have a brain and understand logic. So face them with Human Rights logic according to which their system is racist and sexist. Most of these young males will probably abandon sharia islam if seriously challenged at all societal levels with the illogic of this supremacist ideology. And those who don't, then clearly define themselves as hateful and racist supremacists.


.

Socialist gate openers for islamofascism in UK


Declaring criticism of islamofascism "islamophobia" seems to be highest on the British socialist agenda.


There's no way to argue that criticism of Human Rights violating sharia muslims and sharia islam (aka "islamophobia") should/could be called a "hate crime" as long as that society adheres to Human Rights. Therefore, the only possible outcome of hate campaigns against "islamophobes" is support for islamofascism.

UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".


Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam. 

* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).



Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association


Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.

But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”

Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.

In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.

Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.


Jeremy Corbyn acts "offended" for being called racist. Yet he's openly and covertly racist against Human Rights defender against sharia islamofascism almost every day!


Here together with an islamofascist called Dyab Abou Jahjah whom he said to BBC he had never heard about.



Samuel Westrop: In 2012, Corbyn agreed to speak at a Ramadan celebration with Abdur Raheem Green, a Salafist preacher who has spoken of a "Yehudi [Jewish] ... stench." Green urges Muslims to "push them [Jews] to the side." In addition, Green encourages men to hit their wives to "bring them to goodness," and has called for the killing of homosexuals and adulterers.

In 2014, Corbyn spoke at an event organized by representatives of the Iranian regime, to commemorate the Iranian revolution of 1979. Corbyn's fellow speakers included Hassan al-Sadr, who represents the UK office of Iraqi terrorist Moqtada al-Sadr; and Abdolhossein Moezi, the personal representative of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Also in 2014, Corbyn hosted an event in parliament that featured the "neo-Nazi" speaker James Thring, who has appeared in a revisionist pro-Nazi documentary and has said that, "the Jewish lobby has so much power."

In the wake of Britain's general election, candidates with ties to anti-Semitic extremists and terror groups are standing for important political positions.


Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'


"That is unacceptable to me. Everybody must be equal under the law, and everybody must obey the same law. That is absolutely cast-iron. The point is that the idea of a parallel system of law, a parallel judicature, people making the laws holding to a different system, is absolutely unacceptable, it's alien to our traditions

"I take grave exception to some of the support I see sometimes - and from clerics in the Church of England who've come out in favour of this, I've noticed, and said we should be a little bit indulgent of this.

"It's an interesting fact that we have some clerical fossils still in our legislature. Don't forget we have bishops sitting by right in our upper house.

"The separation of church and state is not perhaps as thorough-going in this country as you might like to think.

"The point is that the idea of a parallel system of law, a parallel judicature, people making the laws holding to a different system, is absolutely unacceptable, it's alien to our traditions.

"I won't have it in London and I'm worried sometimes by the faint bat-squeaks of support that I hear for that idea even from clerics in the Church of England."

Asked if the Beth Din would "have to go", Mr Johnson replied: "Yes, absolutely. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."

He said he accepted that Jewish couples could go to a Beth Din to seek sanction for their divorce, but added: "It cannot substitute for UK civil proceedings.

"They cannot replace the civil proceedings. If they want to have some ceremonial proceeding according to religious ritual or whatever, that is fine. But the actual implementation of the law has got to be done in British courts according to British law, agreed by Parliament.

"That is where the law emanates from. The law emanates in the end from people voting for MPs who enact the statutes which we all obey.

"That gives this country a vital equality."


Bubblegum commented 145 days ago: Bores had better get used to Sharia law on our streets... It will come whether he wants it or not as the Muslim birth rate produces more and more Muslims they will become future voting fodder, What does Boris expect ? That these hoards will not want to change everything to suite themselves ??

Klevius comment: The simple answer is to force politicians etc. to face muslims with the logical choice of Human Rights violating* sharia or apostasy from sharia islam. And, in case of the former, face them with hate, sexism and racism charges! However, the difficult part is to face politicians with this simple logic.

* Meaning truly basic Human Rights - not some silly "rights".






.