Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, June 25, 2017

BBC: Should EU citizens have the right to stay? Klevius: Should muslims have the right to stay?

Goebbels could have learned a lot from BBC about how to spread divisive hate propaganda.


Sharia islamofascism supporting BBC has eagerly searched for racist English citizens who don't want EU citizens to stay in England. Klevius now wonders why they have never asked the same question about muslims? EU citizens moved within EU with a common value basis. And according to the "islamophobic" European Court of Human Rights, sharia islam doesn't comply with EU values.

 Unlike residents from Commonwealth who were allowed to vote about Brexit, EU citizens, whom it reallyconcerned, had no vote. With EU votes there would have been no Brexit at all. This means Brexit is illegal from a basic democratic point of view.

Moreover, Theresa May and her racist supporters try to rob EU residents from even more of their basic rights while calling it "a fair deal". However, the only fair deal is that the government takes full responsibility for Brexit consequences - not rolling it over innocent EU residents who moved to England in accordance with a law that gave them full rights. And if England continuous to give Commonwealth resident the vote, then the same should be given EU residents in England who no longer can democratically vote about England via EU.

Sharia loving Theresa May with her "best ally", Mohammad bin Salman, "the world's most dangerous man", the new leader of the iskamofascist Saudi dictator family who has managed to murder and starve thousands of innocent children and adults in his Mohammedanian campaign for power.

At which point of her life did Theresa May become a racist/sexist supporter of Saudi islamofascism and Human Rightsphobia? Was it her vicker dad who made her prefer religious fundamentalism (sharia etc) instead of Universal Human Rights equality and democratic values? Her "me" campaign and sharia support makes her democracy soul (if she ever had one) heavily tainted.


So how many of the non refugee muslims? BBC won't tell you.


 Is this woman an "islamophobe"? Klevius thinks not. But she's certainly a hateful muslim if she tried to burn an other muslim sect's mosque or if she tried to make it look "islamophobic". Theresa May, Hillary Clinton etc. politicians have certainly given her every reason to do the latter.
.



Thursday, June 22, 2017

Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz is a simple (but dangerous war criminal and hate spreader) Sunni dictator terrorist - and certainly not a "prince"*.


* 1932 when England gave part of the Arabian peninsula to a muslim gangster called Saud, all Western "kingdoms" had already ceased to exist and turned into powerless idols.

The islamofascist Saudi imposter regime


Islam's perversion of Human Rights is best seen in the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and the Saudi based and steered OIC.


BBC today said universities should teach "critical thinking". But that would make them "islamophobic", wouldn't it. And we can't have that because that would be "racist", wouldn't it. And the islamofascist Saudi war criminal terrorist "prince" Salman wouldn't like it, would he.

Salman jr. isn't and will never become a "prince" or a "king" - other than if abdicating from any power - simply because there's no room for dictator kings in a modern world. The Saudi "king" together with a few other retard "kingdoms" is just a sad and unfortunate remnant of the past. The young "prince" is actually one of the oldest on the planet.

However, dealing with him is dealing with the Devil. And most people know it but are silenced with accusations of "islamophobia". Klevius advise you to hide in a voting boot.




Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Klevius wishes his readers god Midsommar ('good Midsummer' in the Old Nordic dialect now called 'English' after 'England').


Stonehenge originated in the northeast.







BBC's muslim sharia house preacher Mona Siddiqui - who also happens to be Theresa May's "investigator" of sharia courts in England - asks for "empathy".




However, Klevius has interacted with many muslims and has noticed a proportionally much higher lack of "empathy" among muslims than other groups of people. These interactions have had nothing to do with criticism of islam etc. mor have the muslims known that Klevius is a Human Rights defender.

This is not at all surprising keeping in mind what islam teaches about the "infidel".

Theresa May's disgusting outburst on "islamophobia" is utterly disgusting and a threat to decent civilized norms based on Human Rights. It is clearly aimed to removing the last defense against islamofascism so to make Saudi sharia and sharia finance compatible with "British values". In other words, she now fulfills her earlier promises to abandon Human Rights and replace them with sharia that fits the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

"Political islam" is a treacherous (but also the main) form of islamofascism that hides under the "islamophobia" umbrella while changing the laws to fit its own expansion.




Monday, June 19, 2017

Klevius question to Theresa May: Is it "islamphobia" to criticize islamofascism?





Is Theresa May using an allegedly psychotic man's senselessness* as an excuse for complying with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's sharia demands?

* Driving over a possibly already dead man and injuring two others.

 Finsbury Park mosque has been a notorious fertalizer of islamofascism of the worst kind. The mosque has been polished on the surface but no one really knows what's still going on when "infidel" visitors have gone and the Koran and its "prophet" is contemplated "as the only way".

What we do know with certainty is that sharia islam doesn't comply with the most basic of Human Rights. So why is it "islamophobia" to say this simple truth that even the European Court of Human Rights has subscribed to?

Theresa May servicing Saudi state islamofascism.

Or does Theresa May think that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family are no muslims?



Did the islamofascist Saudi dictator family "hijack" islam?

Sadly, Theresa May now shares with her Saudi "ally" the view that Human Rights is a form of "extremism" and "terrorism".


Klevius suggestion to Theresa May: Perhaps it could be conducive to the good for non-muslims and non islamofascist muslims to know what you really mean by the wide terms "islamophobia" and "extremism".
Moreover, in her attack on "islamophobia" Theresa May helps islamists take cover as muslims following (e.g. Saudi type) islam, while also making it harder for moderate "muslims" to finding a way out from that horrifying religious Bora Dora cave that she locks by hindering criticism of islamiofascism. 

A truly "difficult woman".

And here's a truly "difficult" Swedish man:


.

Islamists know that Human Rights equality constitutes the main threat to their islamist faith - that's why shouting against "islamophobia" (Human Rights) is so important to them.


An allegedly psychotic man drives over a man who was possibly already about to die from a heart attack, and two muslims who helped the man and were injured. However, eight muslims ended up in hospital, which means six of them must have got their injuries after the "terrorist attack" while trying to catch the allegedly psychotic driver who was described as "strong".

Klevius question: Is a mentally ill person's attack a "terrorist attack". And could one legally argue that retaliation attacks have exactly the same "hate" component as the hate attacks that preceded them - i.e. that constituted the very reason for BBC's use of the word 'retaliation'?

Moreover, compared to muslim terrorist attacks there can not be any clear motive - other than the same as muslim terroist attacks, i.e. mainly Saudi spread Wahhabi/Salafi Koran and Mohammad examples of hate against the non-muslim.



There's a reason why muslims attack non-muslims that precedes "islamophobia". When will Theresa May address this - so to protect both muslims and non-muslims, instead of s clearly biased, bigoted and hypocritical approach that only serves to give more space for islamists?