Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japanese space robot 10 yrs before Rosetta

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Saturday, July 04, 2015

What about politicians who, against the will of the people, support sharia while dismissing Human Rights?


Negative Human Rights for a positive future free from sharia islam - the worst ideological crime ever.

An ideology similar to sharia islam but without a "religious" name would without the slightest doubt be considered a hateful racist and sexist supremacist organization.


Sharia muslims of the muslim world Umma want to force countries to change their laws to submit to sharia. And because every form of sharia is against the most basic Human Rights then sharia islam constitutes a crime from a Human Rights point of view - similarily as Saudi Arabia consider Human Rights a crime against sharia islam.


Islam always means sharia islam, i.e. something that violates Human Rights. Islam without sharia is no longer islam in any meaningful sense.

US' Declaration of Independence constituted an indictment of the Crown and Parliament of good old England.

Similarily sharia islam is a criminal conspiracy and those who support it may well be seen as traitors.


 Magna Carta Libertatum is the first rudimentary effort in a long struggle towards the final 1948 Human Rights declaration which PM David Cameron now again seems to betray by giving in for Human Rights violating sharia.




Back in 1215 Magna Carta (the first predecessor to Human Rights) was produced to stifle traitor King John's effort to islamize Britian. Compare this to the  British PM Cameron's attacks on Human Rights while seemingly proposing Britain as the center of islamofascism outside Mideast (beginning with London sharia finance).



King John the Traitor, PM David Cameron and the islamofascist "king" Abdullah who pretended to be "reformist" while steering the country in an even more intolerant direction by new sharia inspired laws by early 2014 (e.g. equalizing Human Rights, Secularism and Atheism with "terrorism" and due penalties - compare Raif Badawi and others).

King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to Islam and turn England into a muslim state. The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom subject and obedient to him, would voluntarily ... make tributary a country that is free, by giving to a stranger that which is his own ... conquered, as it were, without a wound. I have rather read and heard from many that they would procure liberty for themselves at the expense of streams of blood, which is a praiseworthy action; but now I hear that your wretched lord, a sloth and a coward, who is even worse than nothing, wishes from a free man to become a slave, who is the most miserable of all human beings." Mohammed al-Nâsir concluded by wondering aloud why the English allowed such a man to lord over them — they must, he said, be very servile and soft.


Check your muslim friend by asking her/him if she/he supports supremacist sharia islam!

Then ask your politicians, teachers etc the same.









.

David vs. Goliat/Japan vs. US: Real football against American "football"? It's all up to the referee.


The "beautiful game" is the king and queen of all sports


US women footballers are not on the same level as the Japanese when it comes to technical skills but if the referee allows it, US may easily win by physically destroying the Japanese game. However, that wouldn't be in the interest of "the beautiful game" would it. To be fair though, US men and women have also a reputation of stretching themselves in the hard place more than most. Klevius will naturally applaud the team that plays the best football and manages to score without assists from the referee in this particular match.

Football, unlike American "football", is open for all shapes and sizes. The world's best male player is 169 cm.


Lionel Messi 169 cm

In football there are players who could be described as heavy weight muscle mountains, but then there are also players like one of England's best players ever, Peter Crouch, who measures 203 cm and weighed in with a proportionally tiny 75 kg.

Peter Crouch 203 cm

Marta da Silva 161 cm


Birgit Prinz 179 cm

Klevius wrote:

Friday, September 28, 2007

David (Marta/Brazil) won Goliat (Wambach/US) in women's world cup semi-final by "playing like men" - size doesn't matter & no Islamic team even close!

Klevius comment: Football (soccer) is perfect for emancipation, as long as it avoids "feminization". The re-vitalization of US female "soccer" has been severly hurt by the 1990s anti-Tomboy "girl power feminism" (+ the stupid US-"football" prejudice of "soccer" as a "sissy", i.e. "feminine" sport) whereas Marta & Co is the very result of learning from boys/men, not because they are males but because they have had access to the global university of football on backyards, streets, schoolyards, sports clubs, teams etc. settings usually denied girls because of sex segregation.

Klevius EMAH comment (EMAH = the Even More Astonishing Hypothesis on brain/consciousness/motoric function): During childhood and adolescence, white matter anisotropy changes in the brain affect the posterior limb of the internal capsule, intrathalamic connections, and corpus callosum. The presence of stimuli for these changes seem to be important for childhood development of attention, motor skills, cognitive ability, and memory. As one of the most significent differences between humans and other primates is a higher proportion of white matter (i.e. brain connections), and as we do know that women tend to have a lower proportion than men, my guess is that most, perhaps all, of this difference may be signed sex segregation in upbringing. (for a deeper understanding of the brain/body interface see EMAH)!

Klevius evolutionary comment (also see Klevius evolution blog): The desperate search for evolutionary traces supporting sexist sex segregation prejudices (see From Klevius without love) is perhaps best exemplified by the notorious Lawrence Summers, the president of Harvard University, and his fanatic ideas abt innate sexism. Now a "researcher" at the same university, Coren Apicella, delivers the next stupidity on this path by wildly speculating ("We really don't know what is behind this yet") that males with deeper voice pitch are better breeders (made me think abt high pitch Somali males in Sweden with some ten kids each - yes, of course I know it's the same cultural sexism but in the shape of Islam). Apicella conducted her "research" by driving randomly in Tanzania and asking pygmy-like statured Hadza males abt their kids! But when there is a positive expectation/demand for a certain result, the quality of the research usually suffers. It's also noteworthy that human evolution during the last two million years has been precisely in the opposite direction, namely towards less, not more, sexual dimorphism, i.e. we (in general, - I don't know abt Summers) have distanced ourselves from Gorillas, Orangutangs etc! It may also be noted that according to Frank W Marlowe "Hadza men value fertility in a mate more than women do, and women value intelligence more than men do"! Furthermore, according to Klevius, one may also consider the effects of Bantu/Arab gene flow (not the least because of Bantu/Islamic slavery) on a pygmy-like population (or didn't she even control for the stature/pitch relation?!).


Lack of talented football girls is "cured" by size in many teams

In football (soccer) too big size may, in fact, be a handicap (btw, Wambach isn't too big). Most of the best football stars have been small or medium size (Pele, Maradona, Carlos, Hamm, Marta etc). However, because most girls have been so heavily brainwashed with sex segregation the pool of talents has been dried up to an extent that forces teams to compensate with size. In women's 2007 World championship teams with real talents may be best represented by North Korea and Brazil. The former has avoided this effect of sex segregation because of its rigid DDR-style system, and the latter because of its lack of system.

For fanatic, sex segregated thinking, however, the small (10-15%) sexual dimorphism among modern humans seems to be more of a problem than the much bigger difference within the sexes. A sexistperson may have no problem with the huge difference in quality between elite football and e.g. corporate or junior level football, but are unable to filter female football! Why?!


Here's Birgit Prinz's stunning goal discussed by Klevius back in 2009

Klevius wrote 2009:

Did Germany's Birgit Prinz, score the best ever goal (incl. those of men) in 2009?




The video is here  (it can only be seen from the original posting).

Klevius motivation:

1 The attack (from an in-throw) was as clean as it gets. Check out the video & consider how Simone Laudehr's extremely well placed pass (into an open but crucial area) is taken by Inka Grings who was initially further from the ball than Prinz, who runs in the opposite direction.

2 Inka Grings then does just the opposite to what one would have expected. Instead of running with the ball into the empty space from where she could have tried a cross to Birgit Prinz, she turns against & between two defenders and quickly squares the ball across the penalty area just before Birgit Prinz encounters the defenders.

3 Birgit Prinz accelerates strongly & manages not only to reach the ball before a defender crashes into her, but also to cheat the goalkeeper (see how the keeper moves to the wrong direction) while then perfectly turning her foot in the last fraction of a second to give the ball ultimate precision, before she is smashed to the ground by the flying defender.

Who said women's football is boring?


Size doesn't matter in football
However, although Birgit Prinz is a six footer (179 cm), in footbal you can be any size & still world class. Lionel Messi, the world's best male player 2009 is 169 cm/67 kg, while the next best (Xavi) is 170 cm/69 kg! Third place Ronaldo is 185 cm. Among women Marta da Silva (162 cm/57 kg) is the world's best player for the fourth year in a row, with Birgit Prinz right behind!

Football is the most emancipating sport in the world

This goal hasn’t even been mentioned among the best, perhaps because women’s football is hardly mentioned at all in the media. And the reason for this is the same as with evil islam, namely that so many women participate in directing girls into the sex segregation trap of their own *starting physically with Indonesian muslim women who mutilate every female child, to Western glamour feminists who push their daughters into the time consuming trap of empty & pointless artificial "feminization".

As Otto Weininger put it a century ago: "The main obstacle for women's emancipation is the Woman".
Klevius doesn't in any sense want to point out how women should behave, quite the contrary. He couldn't call himself intelligent if he would, could he! However, what Klevius does want to do is to help minimizing the number of girls who limit themselves or commit self rape becaudse of cultural sexism. In this Klevius stands in the deapest oppositition to islam, while Mr X US "president" says he "respect" islam (and no wonder, look at his islamofascist pals)!

Origin of islam & its evil parasitic booty/sex/slavery/reproduction formula
Btw, a professor friend (sociology) thinks I “uber-emphasize” sex segregation. My question then to him & to all of you is: How can one ever “uber-emphasize” something that affects negatively & directly HALF of the world population, & indirectly the WHOLE of the world population, & which is upheld on no logical grounds at all?! And which constitutes the cornerstone for the evil interface between islam & the rest of the world! And which constitutes the main difference in OIC's Cairo Declaration which (initiated by Saudi islamic theocracy) aims for the destruction of UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration, combined with a global effort (via UN) to criminalize criticism of islam! Read more from Klevius (e.g. From Freud to bin Laden or What is sex segregation?) to understand why islam & feminism share so much & why the first feminists didn't support votes for women! And why feminists can't agree if Mary Wollstonecraft was a feminist or an anti-feminist!

Or perhaps Klevius Marriage, kinship & friendship

Or even better, the most important sociological paper from the last century: Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state




.

Thursday, July 02, 2015

Klevius: Analyze the blood of islam's victims and you'll find traces of the Saudi dictator family's hate mongering in most of them!


The evil Saudi muslim supremacist hate mongering dictator family


The Islamic State is more or less a copy of Saudi Sunni Salafist (Wahhabi) islam simply because it was originally invented in and supported by Saudi Arabia as their military tool to spread their evil influence in other countries under cover. However, the chickens are now coming home to roast which fact reveals the bottomless depth of the Saudi state's bigoted evilness and hypocrisy. As a result of the Saudi dictator family's hate campaign against non-Sunni/Wahhabi muslims, Shia groups have now formed self-defence units within the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia hence forming a third internal factor of dissonance. And to justify atrocities against the Shias, the Saudi dictator family accuses non-Arabic Shia Iran.

An example of how islamic hate works


In a closed Afgan appeals court, with no journalists or other observers present, eliminated the death sentences imposed on four muslim men for their part in the mob killing of a young woman, Farkhunda Malikzada, in Kabul in March 2015, when she was attacked at an islamic shrine after being falsely accused of burning a copy of the Koran..
Moreover, the court also acquitted the keeper of the shrine, known only as Omran, who was the one to incite the mob to kill Farkhunda Malikzada, 27, after she had "argued" with him. She was stoned to death, her body was run over by a car and set on fire. 8 police who didn't do anything to stop it were also aquitted.
Kimberley Motley, an American lawyer in Afghanistan who represented the family during the previous trial: "There's very strong evidence through video and through eyewitness testimony that justified the original sentences that were imposed on these men."

Klevius comment: Farkhunda Malikzada was "a devout muslim" just like those who murdered her.


Klevius wrote:

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

According to BBC, Farkhunda Malikzada's lynching would have been justified if she really did burn the Koran!


Again an islam induced appauling crime committed by pious muslims that "had nothing to do with islam, the Koran or muslims"


Farkhunda Malikzada was a 27-year-old Afghan woman who was lynched by a muslim mob in Kabul on March 19, 2015. She was murdered after allegedly arguing with a so called mullah (a muslim sorcerer) who falsely accused her of burning the unholy manual for racism, sexism, slavery and genocide that they call Koran.

 BBC today: She was lynched for burning the Koran but it turned out that the accusation was false.

Klevius today: Shouldn't BBC rather focus on the muslim lynching mob and the evil message in the book that led to this evil deed instead of bothering about the fate of the material book and the possible feelings of these evil muslims?!

Farkhunda had previously been arguing with a mullah, in front of a mosque where she worked as a religious teacher, about his practice of selling charms at the Shah-Do Shamshira Mosque in Kabul. During this argument, the mullah reportedly accused her of burning the Quran. She responded:

    "I am a Muslim, and Muslims do not burn the Quran!"

According to eyewitnesses, hundreds of angry civilians flocked to the mosque upon overhearing the mullah's accusation. They dragged out Farkhunda and started to beat her. She was thrown from a roof, run over by a car, and beaten with sticks and stones outside the mosque. The mob then set her body alight and dumped it in the Kabul River while police allegedly looked on. Farkhunda's parents said the killing was instigated by the mullah with whom Farkhunda had been talking, who, according to Tolo News, began loudly accusing her of burning the Quran "in order to save his job and life." An eyewitness said that the mob was chanting anti-American and anti-democratic slogans while beating Farkhunda.


However, BBC was more eager to fill British ears with one of the worst apologists for muslim jihadism, Penny Green prof. of Law and Globalisation at Queen Mary University of London (also co-director of International State Crime Initiative - a Saudi filial?). Her illogic is beyond belief but understandable considering she mingles with empty brain like Noam Chomsky etc. And Penny Green was of course as fanatic as usual when she called the fate of jihad spreading Rohyngia muslims from Bamgladesh a "genocide". Muslim Bangladesh to which they belong doesn't accept them, and Britain was part of the original problem which is now utilized by Saudi Arabia and OIC etc.



An example from 2013 of Penny Green's unintellectual approach:

Penny Green: The most powerful way of addressing Egypt's problems would not be to see General Sisi, who led the coup against Morsi, in front of the International Criminal Court, says Green. "I would prefer to see ordinary Egyptians making decisions about the way in which Mubarak or Sisi or Morsi are dealt with. But the more important thing is actually undoing the structures of repression inside Egypt, that would be a very big chore, because that's part of the problem, the institutions of repression of the security services, the ministry of the interior, the police force, the military, and intelligence services all remain intact. And so each successive regime has been able to draw on them when they haven't delivered and when popular protest demonstrates their unpopularity."

Klevius: I refer to the top of the posting and rest my case.


Penny Green's so called ISCI was awarded £830,000 by the UK's Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for a project entitled, ‘Resisting State Crime: A Comparative Study of Civil Society’ (ES/I030816/1). The project aims to study the role of civil society organisations in defining, censuring and resisting criminal acts committed, instigated or condoned by state agencies. It is a cross-cultural, comparative study which focuses on countries which are all undergoing processes of reconstruction following severe violent conflict, but which have very different levels of economic and political development. The project will explore the ‘life histories’ of a range of grass roots civil society organisations dedicated to challenging state violence and corruption. The study compares Burma, Colombia, Papua New Guinea, Sierre Leone, Tunisia, and Turkey.

Klevius: Can't see Saudi Arabia on the list, can you!

Obama's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism also lacks the worst - Saudi Arabia. Wonder why?


Countries determined by the Secretary of State to have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism are designated pursuant to three laws: section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act, section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, and section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act. Taken together, the four main categories of sanctions resulting from designation under these authorities include restrictions on U.S. foreign assistance; a ban on defense exports and sales; certain controls over exports of dual use items; and miscellaneous financial and other restrictions.

Designation under the above-referenced authorities also implicates other sanctions laws that penalize persons and countries engaging in certain trade with state sponsors. Currently there are four countries designated under these authorities: Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
Country     Designation Date
Cuba     March 1, 1982
Iran     January 19, 1984
Sudan     August 12, 1993
Syria     December 29, 1979


However, compare this list to the following facts:


Saudi Arabia is still executing witches and sorcerers after sharia "trials" were their "guilt" of such "crimes" is determined. It also sponsors most of world jihadism. Moreover, it harbours OIC, all the world's muslims sharia organization!


This (Saud based OIC and its Saudi Sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani) is islam today - and it's against the most basic Human Rights! No matter how many times you or your informants tell us islam is nice!




Saudi Arabia is said to be the world's largest source of funds and promoter of Salafist jihadism, which forms the ideological basis of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS and others. Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide, according to Hillary Clinton. According to a secret December 2009 paper signed by the US secretary of state, "Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups."

The violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan is partly bankrolled by wealthy, conservative donors across the Arabian Sea whose governments do little to stop them. Three other Arab countries which are listed as sources of militant money are Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, all neighbors of Saudi Arabia. Taliban and their militant partners the Haqqani network earn "significant funds" through UAE-based businesses. Kuwait is described as a "source of funds and a key transit point" for al-Qaida and other militant groups. The Pakistani militant outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks, used a Saudi-based front company to fund its activities in 2005. According to studies, most of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudis. 15 of the 19 hijackers of the four airliners who were responsible for 9/11 originated from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Osama bin Laden was a Saudi by birth. His family is a wealthy one intimately connected with the innermost circles of the Saudi royal family.

Starting in the mid-1970s the Islamic resurgence was funded by an abundance of money from Saudi Arabian oil exports. The tens of billions of dollars in "petro-Islam" largess obtained from the recently heightened price of oil funded an estimated "90% of the expenses of the entire faith."

Throughout the Sunni Muslim world, religious institutions for people both young and old, from children's maddrassas to high-level scholarships received Saudi funding, "books, scholarships, fellowships, and mosques" (for example, "more than 1500 mosques were built and paid for with money obtained from public Saudi funds over the last 50 years"), along with training in the Kingdom for the preachers and teachers who went on to teach and work at these universities, schools, mosques, etc.[103] The funding was also used to reward journalists and academics who followed the Saudis' strict interpretation of Islam; and satellite campuses were built around Egypt for Al Azhar, the world's oldest and most influential Islamic university.

The interpretation of Islam promoted by this funding was the strict, conservative Saudi-based Wahhabism or Salafism. In its harshest form it preached that Muslims should not only "always oppose" infidels "in every way," but "hate them for their religion ... for Allah's sake," that democracy "is responsible for all the horrible wars of the 20th century," that Shia and other non-Wahhabi Muslims were "infidels", etc. While this effort has by no means converted all, or even most, Muslims to the Wahhabist interpretation of Islam, it has done much to overwhelm more moderate local interpretations, and has set the Saudi-interpretation of Islam as the "gold standard" of religion in Muslims' minds.

By its nature, Saudi Wahhabism encourages intolerance and promotes terrorism. Former CIA director James Woolsey described it as "the soil in which Al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are flourishing."



 Klevius wrote:

Saturday, August 17, 2013

Imam who allegedly planted burned pages of Koran in a Christian girls bag not indicted

Rimsha Masih and her family had to escape to Canada while no one in muslim Pakistan had to bare any responsibility for the evil and racist hate campaign she and her family had experienced.

Did you get that? No indictment whatsoever. The imam wasn't "freed" as now reported by confused Western news channels. HE WAS NEVER EVEN INDICTED FOR ANYTHING! And he wasn't under suspicion of framing the girl but of suspicion of having burned Koran pages (Pakistan's beloved "blasphemy" Sharia law). So logically this decision today to drop the investigation equals putting the guilt back on the poor Christian girl and her family who had been heavily harassed by their racist and hateful supremacist muslim neighbors. It seems that Klevius again hit the bull's eye in the posting one year ago seen below.


This is what Klevius wrote about Rimsha Masih and the imam a year ago:


Sunday, September 09, 2012

Klevius islam tutorial for Los Angeles Times: Blasphemy and "islamophobia" are synonymes!

LAT got islam all wrong! How many others have?

According to Los Angeles Times headline, Muhammad Khalid Chishti was accused for "framing". Well, that's quite far from the truth!


 Klevius: The muslim Cleric wasn't accused of framing a Christian girl. He was accused of blasphemy against islam (the worst crime ever against humanity)!

Why is it that every evil deed originating in islam is "interpreted/transformed" into something else that looks less bad for evil islam?

A muslim Pakistani cleric, Muhammad Khalid Chishti, was detained on suspicion that he had teared out pages from the Koran. That these pages then were put into Ms. Masih’s bag was irrelevant although the police, probably in a kind pr gesture to foreign reporters, said that it was possible that other charges could follow.



Evil ideologies need evil protection and evil leaders - and to be supported by ignorance


Islam is a disastrous ideology, even worse than National-socialism (popularly called Nazism for the purpose of trying to make a socialist party  with a bad reputation "right-wing") because islam doesn't stop by the nation but wants to be totalitarian.

And precisely because of islam's enormous evilness (that the "negative" freedom part of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights so effectively has revealed) it needs every means to protect itself from criticism. This task is now in the hands of the Hitler of our time, OIC's Fuhrer (or Caliph as he himself has said he wants to be called) Egyptian born Turk, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu. He's one of the world's most eager proponents for blasphemy laws under Sharia, which he then presents in the West under the title "islamophobia".


How long will the World tolerate this evil islam hoax?


Russell D. Moore: If a Christian majority existed in a country, with the will to enforce all the laws it could, would this country be justified in outlawing Islam or atheism or Wicca? Why not? Fundamentally, this is because blasphemy laws and other uses of state power to enforce religious belief or worship are themselves a repudiation of the beliefs themselves. A religion that needs state power to enforce obedience to its beliefs is a religion that has lost confidence in the power of its Deity.


Klevius comment: Apart from the fact that islam isn't a "religion" in any meaningful sense it's all about state power in the form of the muslim state called Umma and led by the oil fueled Saudi/OIC network. The utterly dumb strategy to excuse medieval fascism in our time on the grounds that it needs time to mature into a modern civilized world should be replaced by the speeding up of the process by addressing islam's deep incompatibility with the basics of Human Rights (an incompatibility that islamofascist OIC and its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu readily have admitted by replacing Human Rights with Sharia in UN and elsewhere). Only then we can spare the lives and sufferings of the victims of islam.









.

Wednesday, July 01, 2015

Neo-muslims vs. supremacist hate muslims


Who are guilty of misinforming about sharia islam? How many victims of muslim supremacist hate crimes could have been avoided with some "islamophobic" warnings?!



 The few muslim women on the beach were easily recognized and avoided by the hateful racist muslim mass murderer who followed the same type of muslim rules as those respected by many politicians in the West. One needs to understand that contempt against "infidels" (such as e.g. not shaking hand etc etc) that is accepted and normalized as "their religion demands it", are just the tip of the hateful racist/sexist supremacist iceberg we know as islam.

Most victims of hateful supremacist muslims weren't naive - they were deliberately misled about the origin and true nature of islamofascist supremacist hate!


 Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing extreme contempt and insensitivity against others. And this is also why OIC (all muslims world organization) not only have abandoned and even criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).

Katie Jemma Gee and her friend were later also thrown acid in their face by some male supremacist muslim haters - most probably connected to the first incident.

Consider that we have possibly millions of such hate crimes going on unreported around the world - often without the victims even knowing or understanding that it was islam that hit them.

The more politicians defend and legitimize sharia islam while spitting on Human Rights, the more it encourages muslim "radicalization"*.

Islam can't be radicalized because it's already radical from scratch!

 Muslims go West to a civilization superior to their sharia based homelands. The pattern is actually quite similar to how muslims some 1400 yrs ago moved to the civilized world with the Koranic hate sword as their ticket. Only difference is that the sword now arrives slightly delayed in comparison. And no, the Islamic State isn't the biggest threat to the West. Saudi based and steered OIC is a much more lethal weapon against Western democracies precisely because it has managed to sneak in Human Rights violating islamic sharia into UN - the organization that was supposed to defend Human Rights. And by doing so the Saudis have also managed to tie up many of Western politicians.


Klevius origin-of-islam equation vs. the peaceful-origin-of-islam equation


Historians are scratching their heads in their effort to understand the seemingly impossible equation of a nice and tolerant "prophet" with a "message" of looting, enslaving and raping, managing to conquer much of the Arabian peninsulain a short period of time. Why? The picture is crispy clear for everyone who is prepared to look. Are they really that stupid? Of course not. It's only when they try to squeeze in the "tolerant" and "peaceful religion" that the equation becomes unsolvable.

Klevius repeats his suggestion of the only solution: Differ between Human Rights violating sharia muslims and neo-muslims (i.e. muslims against sharia and for Human Rights)! If there are any such muslims at all when neo-islam has lost its original evil racist/sexist attraction.




.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

PM David Cameron says UK muslims are helping Islamic State - but don't mention islam!


Why can't the British PM utter the enemy's name (sharia islam) and the only true repellent (Human Rights)? Instead he talks about a 'perverted ideology' and 'British values'. 

 To be "perfectly clear" about David Cameron, pick some of the following news titles - or add your own:

1 David Cameron: The Islamic caliphate has nothing to do with islam!
2 David Cameron: Muslims do it (supporting Islamic State).
3 David Cameron is a crypto-"islamophobe".
4 David Cameron uses British muslims as scapegoats.
5 David Cameron: Muslims must repel Islamic State, sorry, Daesh, sorry, ISIL!
(no words containing islam should be used, remember)

Klevius: What is the connection between Cameron's 'some muslims' and the Islamic State, sorry, ISIL? If Islamic State has nothing to do with islam then why does David Cameron target British muslims?!






More muslim doctors, police etc. inevitably means a higher risk of you meeting a more devout one, doesn't it.

 Klevius: If the murderers, rapists, looters etc. who accompanied "prophet" Muhammad and spread terror and slavery wherever they went were muslims, but muslims of today are not, maybe we should call the latter neo-muslims and their ideology neo-islam so not to offend nice "muslims".

Klevius wrote:

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

UK Camoron uses political Islam while denying Islam is Islam - and forbids BBC calling bin Laden & Co Islamists!


Dear Mr Cameron - you've either got it all wrong - or you are just a politician!

"Moderate" Islamic Malaysian Islamic law regards people born to Muslims as being Muslims themselves, no matter what they think - themselves!

Revathi Masoosai, an ethnic Indian, was detained by the Islamic Religious Department in southern Malacca and sent for religious "counseling" in a "rehabilitation" center after they discovered she had been born to a Muslim family. Islamic officials then seized her 15 month daughter.


Saudi Expert on Family Affairs Dr. Ghazi Al-Shimari Explains Wife Beating in Islam

"According to a reliable Hadith, a woman said: "Oh Prophet of Allah, I will not marry before you tell me what my husband's rights from me are." The Prophet said: "Do you really want to know?" She said: "Yes." He said: "If pus or blood comes out of your husband's nose and you lick is up, you still will not have observed all his rights." The rights of the husband are great, and you must observe them."

Maulana Nawabzadaa Nabiullah Khan (a confidant of and adviser to the Amir of leading Pakistani Islamic party, Jamaat-e-Islami, Maulana Qazi Ahmed): "Mohammad's views on women are the exact views of Qazi Ahmed and the Jamat. Equality of men and women is stupidity. What men can do, women cannot do. Women are weak physically and mentally compared to men. Men have to take care of women all the time"


Conservative leader David Cameron: Stop labeling terrorists as Islamic or Islamist! "By using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them. He continued: Britain's state-funded broadcaster BBC should give direction and stop associating terrorism with Islam! "To inspire Muslims to feel British, Cameron also proposed that sometime needed to be done about "the quality of life that we offer, our society and our values." However: "Here the picture is bleak: family breakdown, drugs, crime and incivility are part of the normal experience of modern Britain. Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate."

Klevius comment to Cameron: You don't seem to have any respect for Muslims and Islam, do you? I mean, by removing such basic (and, btw, extremist) tenets of Islam as accepting slave terror, rapetivism/marriage terror, death etc for apostasy, blasphemy ban, infidel racism/sexism etc. - what's left?! And IRA, btw, cannot be compared to Islamic terrorists because it was not to my knowing claiming to blow things up in the name of the Chatolic religion! Where's your brain, Cameron?! Why didn't you ask the Muslim family you visited abt their view on basic Islamic tenets and what they really think abt non-Muslims. And if they'd answered I'm 100% sure you couldn't repeat them in any other modern democratic human rights/equality forum! Only when it comes to Islam everythhing seems to be OK. Why?!

It's a fact that the welfare state has failed to breed family/kinship ties - on the contrary actually, as you can see in the most important sociological paper from the last century - Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state. Child/youth criminality, caused by detachment, fills streets and schools etc. However, Totalitarian infidel-racist/sexist Islam is hardly the way out - in fact many, perhaps most, of the victims are terrorized by Islam induced infidel ideology, perhaps also from so called "peaceful Muslim homes"!

According to US attorney Gonzales' prepared remarks and a Justice Department fact sheet, obtained by The Associated Press, a study found:
_That a growing number of offenders appear to be younger, and their crimes more violent, and that laws in some states provide few, if any, tough penalties on juvenile offenders.
_Many youths have little parental oversight and are too easily influenced by gang membership and glamorized violence in popular culture.
_Loosely organized gangs present the biggest concern for law enforcement officials because they are hard to investigate and their members often commit random acts of crime out of self-protection.
_Offenses committed by people using firearms pose a major threat not only to communities, but also to police. So-called "straw purchases," where gun owners buy their firearms through a go-between is an area of concern.

UK Merseyside & Cheshire (pop. 2 M): The Home Office insisted levels of youth crime were falling, but opposition parties said more and more young people were getting involved in serious crime because they thought they could get away with it.

Michelle Forbes (Mothers Against Guns): “Each gang has a set of initiation, they have to prove their commitment and loyalty to the gang by shooting someone.
“They use fear and intimidation – they’re not even wearing anything over their heads because they are so confident nobody is going to report them.
“If my child was involved in gang warfare, I would report him because I would rather be visiting him in prison than in a cemetery.
“People must start shopping their children to the police.”

Children as young as 10 have been arrested for robbery and burglary, with 346 under 17 for the former, and 1,050 for the latter.
Recent figures revealed more than 1,400 crimes committed by under 14 in the Merseyside and Cheshire area.


Sweden: In a survey among 4 500 children/youth in Stockholm and Malmö half of robbery victims didn't reprt to the police cause it was meaningless and dangerous and the offender seldom gets any penalty but rather hits back again on the victim.

In Japan child/youth criminality is, compared to us, still on a low level whereas the Swedish (and British) figures might well be among the highest in the world (Klevius 1996) in Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state.


Origin of Islam

We can't really continue thinking of girls/women as second class citizens and first class rape victims and breeders, can we! Islam originated in Arabic slave trade (btw, first Koranic slaves were Arabs followed by the worlds's most extensive slavery ever) following the old trade roots passing Mecca, the world's main slave market, and Koran was a manual for this slavery/conquest/rapetivism, written on top of some ancient Jewish etc tales and laws from a distant past. Islam was a tremendous boost to the international slave trading (see e.g. my Origin of Vikings - usually #1 on Yahoo) that caused the drainage/corruption of almost the entire Africa. Connected to slavery was (& still is) rapetivism (rape-marriage/compulsory Sharia-fostering of new Muslims - who later face apostasy punishment if attempting to leave). Because of its lack of internal logic (other than slavery/rapetivism) Islam has to use physical or judicial violence such as jihad, Sharia, apostasy ban, blasphemy ban, non-Muslims to pay Jizya tax, infidel racism as a "moral" code for slavery/rapetivism violence/rape/assault/t5hreatening/terror etc etc. However, because many non-Muslims share the same sex segregation it leaves plenty of space for Islam (there will never be such a creature as "modern" or "moderate" Islam - that's why we have the "silent Muslim majority" around). Islam is Islamofascism because it's racist/sexist/totalitarian/violent and non-negotiable because of its original idea/tenets!



.