Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

The hotline closed since 1400 years - leaving muslims on their own

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Are muslims evil?

What is islam, & is there a "moderate" islam?

Turkey is the richest islamic nation, & knocking on EU's door. Acccording to Turkish PM Erdogan "These descriptions (moderate islam) are very ugly. It is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam, and that's it."

Who is a muslim then?

According to brainless Wikipedia, "a muslim is an adherent of islam".

What is evil?

According to brainless Wikipedia: "Moral evil is the result of any morally negative event caused by the intentional action or inaction of a person."

Klevius conclusion: "Morally negative" may be conceptualized as something that is logically reprehensible on a general level (i.e. not on a specific level, e.g. that most people, even among muslims, have priorities in their relationships). Whereas the 1948 Human Rights declaration is based on Negative Human Rights, meaning that EVERYONE is included & without exclusions, Islam is exclusive & classifies people as unequal, e.g. muslim men, women/slaves, Abrahamists other than muslims, other "infidels". Not only that, but the very ideological initial essence of islam was pure evil piracy parasitism expanded by slavery & rapetivism (Sharia).

Klevius questions:

Is it racist & evil to ethnically classify people as a lower class?
Is it evil to force children from mixed marriage to become muslims, while denying it the other way round?

Is it evil to force or intimidate children to become/stay muslims?

Is it evil to support (or not criticize) a system that makes freedom of religion (apostasy) a crime?

Is it evil support (or not criticize) a system that not to allow others the same by referring to muslimhood as a superior race?

Is it sexist & evil to support (or not criticize) a system that doesn't allow women to choose whom they love (a muslim women IS NOT ALLOWED TO marry a non-muslim)?

Is it evil to support (or not criticize) a system that forces a non'muslim man to become a muslim if he loves a muslim woman (who most often has been made a muslim before she couldn't even talk)?

Is it evil to support (or not criticize) a totalitarian system that only accepts the expansion of itself? In fact, denies the equal right of existence of others.

Is it evil to be silent abt muslim rapes, murders, assaults, threats, intimidations, mockings, while immediately, for whatever trivial reason (i.e. a situation where a Westerner wouldn't stand a chance to be heard although equally "insulted"), abusing the Western legal system (which islam aims to destroy) when there is the slightest chance?

Is it evil to support (or not criticize) an islamic organization (OIC, i.e. all the muslim countries) which criminalizes criticism against itself?

Is it evil to "believe" in a book that is full of evil commands that need "explanations" & "interpretations" to look less evil?

Is it evil to believe in a "prophet" who commits all the worst sins known to mankind?

Is it evil to support muslim expansionist population growth when the resources are limited & the pollutions abundant already?

Is it evil to support muslim expansionist population growth when people affected by islam are among the worst off??

Is it evil not to recognize that most of an entire continent, Africa) has been developmentally destroyed under 1400 yrs because of islam?

Is it evil not to recognize that huge parts of Europe & Asia have been severely victimized because of islam? See e.g. how islam cooperated with the Vikings to drain white slave girls from Europe.

Can there be "moderate" muslims if there are no "moderate" islam?

Most "muslims" are probably ignorant abt islam, hence cannot be accused of evilness. However, those who start comprehending the disgusting roots of islam may, like many previous communists, be categorized in two main groups:

1 Those who are racist & sexist

2 Those who want to "reform" islam

The first group is clearly evil, while the latter group seems to have slipped away from brainless Wikipedia's initial definition as "an adherent of islam".

Klevius conclusion/suggestion: A removing of what is evil in islam (incl. Mohammed's immoral actions & Koran's immoral commands & advices) would castrate islam so badly that nothing meaningful could anymore fill the word islam. This means that some one Billion muslims ought to commit apostasy or, alternatively, that the word 'muslim' ought to be understood as a person (&/or his ancestors) who has suffered under islam (& those who have gained from islam may be called 'islamists').

From Freud to bin Laden

Personally I'm grateful because islam's unbelievable sexism has made it much easier for me to emphasize what I wrote in Angels of Antichrist 1996:

In 1897, the first female Nobel prize winner in literature, Selma Lagerlöf from Sweden, wrote in her novel Antikrists mirakler ("The Miracles of Antichrist") that socialism is the disguise of Antichrist, conceived as the power of evil in the mask of goodness. Lagerlöf, however, also described women voluntarily helping poor people while bearing the growing idea of socialism in their hearts. She ended the novel in a rather optimistic mood, saying that we need not fear Antichrist if we just place the picture of him beside the picture of Christ.
Although the simple Sicilian women in Lagerlöf’s novel, following the Good Samaritan, showed no signs of evil, they were certainly part of a movement that would become the most widespread political force ever. The question, however, remains; is it an evil one?

Neither Western oil money nor Sharia can stop the next revolution (the last & major) against sex segregation when enough women really see the horrifying painting they themselves have contributed to & have continued to transfer to their poor daughters. And many of them will continue to deny what they see. That's why we soon gonna see a full scale cultural "civil" war inside the female sex!

And for you guys who have wondered why feminists like islam, start digging From Klevius without love!

No comments: