People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
A muslim (born) & illegal(?) "(p)resident" paving the way for Saudi/Wahhabi Sharia islamofascism. & Europe persecutes anti-fascists!
Islam is a slave & sex slave "faith" that for 1400 years has incited (& still does because it's its very essence) racist hatred against non-muslims!
IF A U.S. PRESIDENT TODAY, WITH ALL THE KNOWLEDGE WE NOW HAVE ABT ISLAM, STILL SAYS HE "RESPECTS" THE SINGLE WORST CRIME EVER COMMITTED AGAINST HUMANITY, & THAT HE HAS CLOSE RELATION TO SOME OF ITS WORST REPRESENTATIVES ("king" Abdullah & Co, Ingrid Mattson, Nation of slam etc), THEN YOU CAN'T TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY, CAN YOU!
Btw, this islamofascist "king" Abdullah, whom Obama (or whatever) called first of all as a "president", has every year been listed among the ten worst criminals/dictators in the world (no 4 in 2008 after his close friend Sudan's "president" Bashir who is wanted by the Hague tribunal for Darfur genocide etc)! This Abdullah, a close friend of Obama (or whatever), is also the centerpiece in funding hatred against non-muslims around the world through Koran "schools", mosques (see Origin of mosque) universities, schools, democratic institutions etc..
This Abdullah (& Co) is also behind U.N.'s (in fact, 57 anti-democratic islamofascist nations) "defamation" ban, i.e. that criticism/scrutinny of islamofascism ought to be criminalized! Moreover, this Abdullah (& Co) is also behind the islamofascist declaration of "human rights" (by the help of the very same 57 anti-democratic islamofascist nations) which, contrary to the original U.N. Human Rights, deny girls/women freedom.
(read more abt islamic rapetivism on Are you your husband's sex slave?)
& learn abt the origins of the islamic brothels & sex trafficking centers we now call mosques!
Sex segregation & "godism" constitute the main gate through which dangerous & unconstitutional islam is now pouring into the rule of the U.S.
The leader of the American muslims, Saudi funded Wahhabist Ingrid Mattson (see pic above), is invited to Barry Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro's (or whatever) inaugural "prayer service" today. She was also invited by BBHOS (or whatever) as a speaker at the Democrats' convent last year. She is an eager proponent for not only Wahhabism but also islamic Sharia law in America. As islam/Sharia is the very opposite to the aims of the U.S. constitution, this political manipulation ought to be classified as deliberately treacherous.
The confusion under which this subversion takes place has many roots. So e.g. by keeping the banner of "god" high in the air, like a covering umbrella, BBHOS (or whatever) opens up for the worst kind of islamofascism. And what's the worst kind of islamofascism? Well, it's islam, dude! And islam isn't a personal "faith" but political like fascism always is. There's no room for a personal "faith" (which, in effect, would be synonymous with Wittgenstein's impossible "private language"), & even if you somehow managed to squeeze it in, it wouldn't have anything to do with the sexist (sex apartheid) & racist (infidel despise) political grouping that is what we generally mean by islam. The simple rhetorical trick to use this non-islamic "personal faith" (I'll tell you later abt its real meaning) as an excuse for political islam(ofascism) is now used against e.g. Wilders in Netherlands. So please, use this in the defense of him & other victims of the spread of islamofascism!
Klevius comment: During Bush Obama, sorry Osama, was on the run without any possibility to strike. However, on the first day of the BBHOS (or whatever) illegal regime, Osama's terrorist(s) are now inside the White House he missed last time.
1400 YEARS OF ISLAMIC GENOCIDES & SLAVERY, SANCTIONED BY KORAN, CONSTITUTE THE WORST CRIME KNOWN TO HISTORY! BUT TO SAY THIS OPEN TRUTH IS NOW CONSIDERED A CRIME IN NETHERLAND - THE COUNTRY THAT ABANDONED AYAAN HIRSI ALI, THE WORLD'S FOREMOST ANTI-FASCIST HEROINE!
In Medieval time islam wasn't used as a coherent concept for a fascist movement with "the Koran" in common (rather it was, if anything, seen as Mohammedanism, a confused, albeit dangerous, variant of Judaism or Christendom). Islam was largely overlooked because the Jewish & muslim slave traders were (rightly) not primarily seen as representing a "faith" (but fascism, which was called evil in those days). But the islam we talk abt today, when looked upon historically, is by far the single worst ideology when it comes to genocides & slavery through 1400 years - islam's Holocaust against humanity!
No matter how embarrassing & "insulting"(?!) the historical facts are for muslims, this shouldn't be an excuse for becoming Holocaust deniers. And for those morons (or plain evil confidence tricksters) who always try to cover islam's inborn evilness as "cultural misinterpretation", just take a closer look at islam's history outside the camp of biased imams etc islamofascist "scholars".
It's a deep tragedy for the free world then that the core of racist (i.e. the infidel theme in Koran) & sexist (i.e. Koran/Sharia apartheid) & totalitarian (i.e. the expressed aim that Koran/islam should rule all aspects of life & the world) islamofascism is rapetivism, i.e. that women should produce/bring up as many new muslims as possible while under Koran/Sharia threats satisfying the sexual urges of their husbands & moreover, be less worthy in legal matters than men. This heavy burden is then connected to islam's apostasy ban, i.e. that leaving islam is the worst sin/crime a muslim can commit. Also in Koran/islam non-muslims are seen as non-humans which fact may be, at least, equally insulting. So the more voters for islam the less democracy! That's a logic no one can escape!
Klevius comment: Europe has a bad reputation when it comes to fascism, so no wonder that it started there again. And while Europe was saved by US back then, the same support may be lacking this time. However, what makes islamofascism especially troublesome is the fact that the supporters of islamofascism try to confuse the individual faith of "muslims" with political & militant islam(ofascism). The terror group Hamas that was beaten up by Israel lately, is again comforted & hailed. Why? Is it because Hamas managed to murder some 1300 Palestinians?! Launching rockets against civilians in Israel from the front of a school etc. building where Palestine children are placed in "shelter", & then cowardly drive away so the Israeli defense will hit these children, is just but one example of how islam works!
Democracy & islam - an unholy alliance
As a totalitarian political movement islam stands opposite to the core idea of democracy (see Klevius explaning the Holy Negative Human Rights). Whereas democracy is based on the right of the individual islam is not.
So Hamas never won a democratic election!
Winston Churchill on islam: The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property‹either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. The civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Pravda: Obama and his supporters are international con men. Klevius: Obama is either illegal to islam or to the US constitution!
No one knows Barry Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro's real name, his place of birth, who his true parents are or even his actual birth date.
No State or county or city in America has to obey Barry Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro's orders or his laws or any laws passed by an illegally operating Congress. In fact, it can be argued, and probably will, that any person arrested for any crime in America can use, as his defense, that no laws in America are valid because of America’s illegally operating Congress and an ineligible President.
America is said repeatedly, to be a “Nation of Laws”. It is not. It is a Nation under the control of mob rule. When the American public understands that, America will be a Nation of Anarchy.
Obama not only refuses to show proof that he is eligible to become President of the United States of America, but he has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to prohibit any one from discovering his true identity or his history.
Because Obama is not eligible to be the President of the United States, any agreements he makes are subject to change or removal by the current American government of by future administrations, far into the future.
The only power Obama will have is that which is illegally permitted by a corrupt government.
Klevius comment: On top of this massive pile you may add the worst of them all. Barry Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro's refusal to openly commit apostasy from islam, his "faith" of birth & adoption. And if he does he commits the worst crime known to islam which very fact also renders islam illegal under the U.S. constitution!
Also read abt the true Origin of Mosque
Saturday, January 17, 2009
BBC yesterday used an islamofascist British politician to threaten the world with more islamic terror if Hamas isn't allowed to continue its islamic terror jihad against Israel.
Klevius comment: This islamofascist politician's appearance was every bit identical to that of bin Laden & Co. But no one seemed to react, perhaps because the words were nicely wrapped in a smile & innocent words like "there are people who may get violent" (if Israel is allowed to defend itself). It's also notable that when Israel was clumpsy & underestimated islamofascist Hizbollah, the latter's terror atrocities were hailed as "victories", while Israel's successful defense against Hamas' rocket attacks is deemed "disproportional"!? In other words, "proportional" would be when Hamas is able to continue its islamic terror jihad which is by purpose directed against civilians. If it hits non-muslims its good because they are infidels & thus guilty by association & the intimidation can be used for boosting islam. And if it hits muslims it can be blamed on the infidel as well, of course. No matter if it's a primitive Hama's attack bomb or a sophisticated Israeli defense missile.
Many, perhaps most, muslims secretly applaud islamic terrorists because it gives their backward "faith" a sense of power. Did someone mention honor killings!
BBC praises anti-human mosques
BBC visits the temples of islamofascism while senselessly & completely uncritically praising them for its audience who themselves pay for getting this propaganda.
Klevius comment: Keeping in mind the hundreds of millions of slaves who have either died or suffered on the Arabic/islamic slave raid/trade road to the islamic mosque, makes one wonder if BBC in a similar manner would have praised the German gas chambers. Right, we shouldn't talk abt Holocaust & the suffering/genocides of Jews & others. It might hurt the feelings of muslims.
Hamas (i.e. islam) today says it won't stop jihad before its demands are fulfilled.
Klevius comment: Of course not, its totalitarian aims are clearly stated in the Koran. If you don't understand that according to islam only muslims are real humans, then you are easily cheated with islamic rhetoric abt "islam is peace" etc!
Monday, January 12, 2009
The master of platitudes - is U.S. getting its most stupid & dangerous president ever?
B. (Barry, Barack etc) Hussein Soetoro Obama (of unknown birth) says he "is seeking good ideas from all quarters". Well da, where else could he search for them? Unfortunately he is lying because "those quarters" aren't all but those restricted to his criminal pals/supporters & their naive supporters. Obama's black road to the White House has been boosted by his eminence in giving powerful but empty speeches. Reminds one of Hitler before the war, except that Hitler also managed to do something himself for correcting a fast down-sliding economy in the 1930's Germany.
And whereas Obama has sailed comfortably in the fair wind of Google & Co, George W. Bush had to start , continue, & finish against the wind. Bush's heroic moment hence was when he stood in the growel after 9/11 in front of his worst enemy, the media. And what stupid or evil people tried to see as weakness or even stupidity was, in fact, the opposite. Most people know how it feels to perform in front of a compact hostile attitude. Some might call it Bushophobia. However, Bush will certainly go to history as one of the best US presidents ever, i.e. when people, not media, get a chance to evaluate him behind the "disformation" fog. Is he, as I've previously suggested, the last real president of the real USA? However, personally I'm really disappointed that he didn't cut entirely the ties to islamofascist Saudis & islam, a totalitarian political "faith" in direct opposition to the US constitution, & with a horrendous historical track record.
Obama, contrary to Bush, has already convincingly revealed an astonishing lack of personal power of initiative, while revealing an abundance of shortcomings hiding under empty & simplistic populist platitudes. The only thing Obama has a slight hunch abt is how to twist the US constitution. Luckily he himself was too stupid to become a professor, but unluckily he's got some half clever accomplices.
What's alarming is the easiness with which islamofascist Saudis & Co, via the Nation of Islam supramist fascists, managed to cheat the Americans. And without anyone really knowing who he is!
Obama & Kenya
B.* Hussein Obama has tight connections to the leader of the Kenyan islamofascists who assaulted & slaughtered non-muslim Kenyans for the purpose of gaining power.
* No one knows his real name. American Barry was in use until he visited Pakistan 1981 & changed to Arabic Barack which is his muslim name given at birth (in Kenya?!).
Obama in Indonesia & Pakistan
B. Hussein Obama's alleged surname is also inherited from a muslim but was changed to Soetoro after adoption to an other muslim & due Indonesian citizenship which made it possible for the grown up Obama to enter Pakistan at a time when it was forbidden for US citizens.
Obama & Saudi Arabia et al
Obama was elected by the help of Saudi & Co propaganda funds. Directly through the caampaign & indirectly through the deep & widespread islamofascist network in the US such as e.g. CAIR, universities, mosques & islam supporting media.
At least one of Obama's close sponsors (a Nation of Islam fascist lawyer) is employed by the Saudi wahhabists.
Obama's supporters, Saudi & Co islamofascists (Gulf Cooperation Council) recently “hailed efforts by the Sudanese government to resolve the crisis and its cooperation with all efforts undertaken for a settlement of Darfur conflict”. Klevius comment: The Sudanese government happens to be led by Bashir, accused for having masterminded the islamofascist Darfur genpocide!
Obama & U.S
Apart from the "minor" issue that Obama isn't a 'natural born' U.S. citizen (which fact would have immediately disqualified him had he only released his long form birth certificate. As it stands now Americans get a president through a hole in the legislation - a hole that was long since discovered & utilized by his accomplices when they elaborated their plan! Just look at the smelling tracks behind Obama!) Obama has an even more serious defect. Obama is a born muslim who hasn't officially abandoned islam (in fact, he hasn't even admitted it although he has (at least) two muslim fathers.
Klevius comment: While apostasy (i.e. leaving islam) is the worst crime known to islam, it's the foremost right in the U.S. constitution! Islam & Koran stand in an absolute opposition to the very soul of the constitution. Moreover, a fictive islam that could pass the constitution would have left everything essential to islamic ideologty behind it! I.e. it wouldn't be islam anymore. European Judaism was able to pass precisely because it was enlightened (see e.g. previous post).
If you truly want to improve your understanding of the world visit KLEVUX pages, the most advanced sociology/anthropology on the net, e.g.:
Definition & origin of religion
What's sex segregation & rapetivism?
Origin of man
What is mind?
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state
Thursday, January 08, 2009
When timidity blurs science it may become an accomplice of evilness. And while the world´s attention is focused on clowns such as Obama, Ahmadinejad etc, the most dangerous islamofascists, such as e.g. "king" Abdullah & members of the "house" of Saud/Wahhab are blinked! Why? Most probably because so many have difficulties accepting the real nature of historical islam. And if they do, at least partly as e.g. Bernard Lewis, they rather tend to close the door again than fully opening it. And it's understandable to a certain point. The smell is almost unbearable.
see Islam vs Enlightenment
In Klevius analysis islam is the evil part of Judaism while Christianity is its illegitimate child. This child, however, has had many faces, beginning with that of outcasts & "whores" (see e.g. Klevius 1997 article Was Jesus religious?) The original Christianity may well be described as a refuge for girls/women escaping rapetivism by entering the nun-institution previously outlined in the Roman empire. My analysis of the origin of Vikings may serve as an example of how Christian missionary later came to constitute not only a bull work against the islamic slave/rapetivism institution (aided by Jewish slave traders) but also an important link to the strengthening of rigid "papacy" Christianity. The in vain efforts made today to "find a good islam" seems to blink islam's succesful but evil original formula: Infidel racism/enslavement, Sharia confinement & apostasy ban.
Some certified idiots vs some social scientists
According to Francis Robinson, Huntington's Clash of Civilizations, is simply "the old Western polemic against Islam, Western fears of Islam, and a strong dose of Orientalism". Klevius comment: I haven't even bothered to read it because the conclusion is self evident when you take a look at the historical landscape behind the imams etc islamofascists.
According to Ismail Hossein-Zadeh of Drake University (another simplistic but eager islamofascist Huntington hunter with empty rhetoric), "without communism West needed a new enemy". Klevius comment: So why doesn't islam need an enemy?!
According to yet another islamofascist, also hiding hehind populist simplicity, Edward Said, "the Clash of Civilizations' thesis is a gimmick like 'The War of the Worlds', better for reinforcing defensive self-pride than for critical understanding of the bewildering interdependence of our time". Klevius comment: Said represents a true low mark in social science & is followed by thousands of similar islamofascist fanatists wrapped in Western academics. The "bewildering interdependence of our time" is precisely backward islamic rapetivism vs negative human rights for all, even girls & women!
Bernard Lewis is often mentioned as a critic of islanm. However, although he manages to see some connections he also blink a lot. According to Lewis, the idea that God has enemies, and needs human help in order to identify and dispose of them, is the essence behind islamofascism.
Klevius comment: There are two camps, those who think humans are born evil, & those who think humans are basically neutral. If you prescribe to the latter combined with the idea of negative human rights your moral is safe while still flexible & without any need for a "god".
Lewis also concludes that although the Koran is called monotheistic it divides divinity in two opposite camps, the good and the evil. This is, according to Lewis, “a struggle ordained by God, with its outcome preordained by God, serving as a test of mankind”.
Klevius comment: Monotheism is always exclusive & racist. That's why it needs evilness & infidels.
Lewis: “The barbarians to the east and the south were polytheists and idolaters, offering no serious threat and no competition at all to Islam.”
Klevius comment: Lewis has a surprisingly naive view on islam as somehow, albeit poorly, civilized. But history clearly reveals that islam was the opposite to civilization & that it was precisely this feature (see Origin of islam, the worst crime ever)that was its forenmost asset in its slaughtering, rapetivism, genocides etc. in civilized land!
Lewis: “The last straw—was the challenge to islam's mastery in his ('his' indeed) own house, from emancipated women and rebellious children. It was too much to endure, and the outbreak of rage against these alien, infidel, and incomprehensible forces that had subverted his dominance, disrupted his society, and finally violated the sanctuary of his home was inevitable.”
Klevius comment: The puzzling (to its origin) & stupid (to its insane consequences) he/she divide, which by many is seen as something "natural", is closely related to the roots of Judaism (& as such, of course, also to Judeo-islam). This strange peculiarity is almost absent in the rest of the linguistic world!
Bernard Lewis: “Westerners were the first to break the consensus of acceptance and to outlaw slavery, first at home, then in the other territories they controlled, and finally wherever in the world they were able to exercise power or influence—in a word, by means of imperialism.”
Klevius comment: So why isn’t islam called imperialist when it, in the same way, spread the opposite teaching, i.e. that racism, slavery and sex segregated rapetivism is just & OK?!
Lewis: “Where the West is distinct from all other civilizations is in having recognized, named, and tried, not entirely without success (sic), to remedy these historic diseases. And that is surely a matter for congratulation, not condemnation. We do not hold Western medical science in general, or Dr. Parkinson and Dr. Alzheimer in particular, responsible for the diseases they diagnosed and to which they gave their names.
Klevius comment: "Western" is synonymous with Enlightenement & Enlightenment is synonymous with industrialization (i.e. autimotive technology).
Lewis: For true believers to rule misbelievers is proper and natural, since this provides for the maintenance of the holy law, and gives the misbelievers both the opportunity and the incentive to embrace the true faith. But for misbelievers to rule over true believers is blasphemous and unnatural, since it leads to the corruption of religion and morality in society, and to the flouting or even the abrogation of God's law.
Klevius comment: The most important issue here is that it's precisely "god" that IS the corruption already. The "godists" don't just see it because either they concede "the others" to be potentially converted into their own corruption or just to leave them outside the scope of their own (im)morality.
Lewis: Only by depriving religious institutions of coercive power, it seemed, could Christendom restrain the murderous intolerance and persecution that Christians had visited on followers of other religions and, most of all, on those who professed other forms of their own.
Klevius comment: The fight between competing forms of islam seems to have been the rule for some 1400 years! And today it's Saudi "king" Abdullah & Co (representingt the most evil & intolerant form of islam) that constitutes the most powerful threat to Western civilization precisely because it manages to get so much Western support (which fact is indeed both astonishing & worrisome).
Lewis: There was no need for secularism in Islam, and even its pluralism was very different. Islam was never prepared, either in theory or in practice, to accord full equality to those who held other beliefs and practiced other forms of worship.
Klevius comment: Indeed! Isn't it amazing that Lewis doesn't seem to understand the simple fact that islam's basic tenet is NO EQUALITY AT ALL for non-muslims! Only because of weakness or its own benefit islam will allow others anything!
Lewis: At first the Muslim response to Western civilization was one of admiration and emulation—an immense respect for the achievements of the West, and a desire to imitate and adopt them. This desire arose from a keen and growing awareness of the weakness, poverty, and backwardness of the Islamic world as compared with the advancing West. In our own time this mood of admiration has given way to one of hostility and rejection. This mood is surely due to a feeling of humiliation—a growing awareness of having been overtaken, overborne, and overwhelmed by those whom they regarded as their inferiors.
Klevius comment: That's the drawback of infidel racism paired with a sponging on others due to islam's root in a system of slave finance & rapetivism!
Lewis: There is something in the religious culture of Islam which inspired, in even the humblest peasant or peddler, a dignity and a courtesy toward others.
Klevius comment: Yes Bernard, it’s called racism!
Lewis: The instinct of the masses is not false in locating the ultimate source of these cataclysmic changes (i.e. islamic jihadist terrorism) in the West and in attributing the disruption of their old way of life to the impact of Western domination, Western influence, or Western precept and example.
Lewis: It should by now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations—the perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage.
Klevius comment: West has nothing but islam has everything to do with Judaism! The proper term would be Judeo-islam! Israel, seen as an enemy to islam, is Western, nor Jewish!
Lewis: It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against that rival.
Klevius comment: Irrational reaction?! What would that be? Islamophobia?! I.e. fear for a fascist ideology that preaches hatred, racism, sexism & totalitarianism!
To counter-balance this cautious charlatanism (i.e. to pretend knowledge without fully utilizing it) let me quote a real social scientist, Ayaan Hirsi Ali: "Foretelling the future can be fun for astrologists, prophets and crystal-ball gazers. For academics, it is not. If you get it right, you will be damned like Samuel Huntington. If you get it wrong, you will be called a certified idiot."
If you truly want to improve your understanding of the world visit KLEVUX pages, the most advanced sociology/anthropology on the net, e.g.:
Definition & origin of religion
What's sex segregation & rapetivism?
Origin of man
What is mind?
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state
Monday, January 05, 2009
Islam's extreme child abuse: Islamofascist Hamas (applauded by its supporters?) deliberately murders children!
Backward islam has terrorzed the world for some 1400 years. The same backwardness suites Hamas well because their primitive rockets are perfect for terror because they hit indiscriminately.
Since Israel left Gaza 3 years ago islam has launced thousands of rockets against children in Israel. That few of them actually hit anyone is clearly not intended by Hamas.
When Israel is thus forced to go back & clean up Gaza from terrorists these Hamas islamists use Palestinian children as shields for their own dirty crimes. So in summary Hamas murders both Israel & Palestinian children while trying to blame those whom they have attacked!