Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Would you vote for a candidate who:
1 doesn't fulfill the legal qualifications for being president, and who furthermore tries to cover it up instead of opening up
2 as a born muslim without committing apostasy is against the US constitution because islam rules all aspects of life & FREEDOM!
3 came to political power through a dirty network consisting of some of the worst US racists & black supremacists (Nation of islam etc) & who has never shown any hints of decency when it comes to riding on racism & sexism!
4 has never showed any hint of competence other than the competence of getting into political power positions, & who hasn't revealed anything abt his real thoughts (which can be indirectly deduced from his choice of friends etc).
Klevius comment: Is your own racism so deep so it makes you blind?!
Bill Warner (director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam):
Baraq [Barack] was the name of the winged horse-like creature that took Mohammed to Paradise in the Night Journey. Baraq can also mean God's blessing. Obama is Swahili for Osama, who was one of Mohammed's chief warriors. Osama also means lion. Hussein reminds some Americans of Saddam Hussein, and Obama's supporters get upset if it is used. Hussein was the name of Mohammed's grandson. So Obama's entire name is based upon Islamic mythology and African conquest. Barack Hussein Obama means [Allah's blessing] [Mohammed's grandson] [One of Mohammed's finest warriors].
Obama is descended from slave owners and slave traders, but he does not have a single drop of slave blood in him.
He called himself Barry, an Irish name, for many years in America. He changed what he wanted to be called after he went to Pakistan for a three-week stay. He left America as Barry and returned as Barack.
Some whites may have bought slaves from Islam for 200 years, but after that, their culture was first to outlaw slavery. So Obama changed his name from a culture that abolished slavery to a name from a culture that has enslaved others for 1400 years and has a highly detailed doctrine of slavery.
BBC:s bottomless ignorance (!?) & deeply misleading poicy
A mishmash of extremely naive and tendentious islam propaganda.
Isn’t it amusing, or perhaps rather disturbing, that BBC seems to have introduced new standards for logics, namely one that applies to islam and one that applies to the rest of us, just like islam itself!?
9:30 Thu 2Oct 2008: BBC4 in its endless series “Promoting & glorifying islamofascism”
BBC asks: Could Europe had developed without Arabic translations of Europan (Greek) texts to another European (Latin) text?!
Klevius comment: European Greek to Arabic to European Latin to European Greek?! We do know that Mohammed murdered, enslaved & raped. The rest of islam consists merely of measle words & unfounded glorification! The islamo-Arabs had nothing except their slaves so when they arrived with their empty cultural bags in civilized quarters no wonder they became acculturated!
Sunday, September 28, 2008
While Wikipedia, Google etc. offer fairy tells abt islam for naïve readers Saudis & other islamofascists are right now busy destroying the historical evidence of islam’s crimes. They have not allowed preservation of old buildings, especially those related to Mohammed beause they fear the historical truth! Right now every trace of the birth of the worst crime ever is carefully destroyed in Saudi Arabia!
And all of this happens while the same criminlas abuse UN for the purpose of criminalizing every effort to trace islamic crimes!
According to the Washington-based Saudi Institute most Islamic landmarks have already been destroyed. It cited a 1994 edict by the "kingdom’s" senior council of religious Wahhabi scholars.
Irfan Al Alawi (who founded the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation to study and preserve Mecca and Medina’s history): “1,400-year-old buildings from the early Islamic period risk to be demolished to make way for high rise towers for Muslims flocking to perform the annual pilgrimage to Islam’s holiest city”. They (Wahhabis) have not allowed preservation of old buildings, especially those related to the prophet.” Al Alawi claims to have identified a home of Mohammad. But he is reluctant to publicise its location fearing it would be demolished like Dar al Arqam - the first islamic madrassa. “We are destroying physical links to our past and turning our religion and history into a legend”.
Klevius comment: Isn’t it amazing! Although the real reason for the destruction is to get rid of embarrassing historical facts abt islam, even Saudi “experts” themselves get lured! No wonder then that others are misled too.
In early 18th century (when Europeans & Americans had already adopted the idea abt negative human rights) European Anglican conservatives tried to revive the union between the state and the Church of England, fearing that free people might split up in the “vice” of religious disunity. It was against this background political Wahhabi islam & the thieves of “the house of Saud” (who originally came to power through the hard work of their mainly African slaves on the date palm plantations outside Riyadh) came to adopt the trinity of hiding the truth abt islam, gaining political power through false islam and earning money on artificial islam like pilgrimage idolatry (islamic pilgrimage was originally nothing but slave commerce), the "great islamic mosque mall in Mecca" etc.!
Friday, September 26, 2008
Patricia Crone: “Muhammad's God had something very attractive to offer here and now”! Klevius: Yes, rapetivism!
Patricia Crone: “What the mass conversions show is that Muhammad's God had something very attractive to offer here and now”
Klevius comment: The answer is very simple, islam offered sex “here and now”. The islamic “army” (consisting mainly of teenage boys) was offered not only young girls to rape but also a supramist/racist/sexist moral excuse for it. Moreover, to further enhance motivation they were told that even more sex was eternally secured if they happened to die during jihad. When considering this you may also consider the biological difference, i.e. heterosexual attraction genetically implanted in males (which feminism(s) deny/fail to recognize, but islam fully accepts) that we share with most other primates etc animals. The islamic institution of rapetivism was built on Judaism and slavery, and it couldn't simply stop its looting expansion through the tiny Arabian oasises because otherwise it would have run out of fuel! The "conquest" hence forced-accumulated more and more young "jihadists" for the later and more essential battles.
Follow Klevius blogs/sites and you will (for the first time) meet the full pic of the real islam! Wait until you learn abt the Ziydias etc (will appear on Origin of mosque!