Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
The extreme illogic of islam
Many representatives* of islam really think there’s a logic in islam. However, there’s no other logic in islam except the original evil & inhumane racist/sexist one! But that desert robber/slave trade*** logic inevitably clashes on a global level just like parasitism always does.
*Without representatives of islam there wouldn’t be any islam, stupid**!
** For you who think it’s stupid to call people “stupid”, you may consider that Klevius never calls simple minded people “stupid”. In this actual case it was meant for those morons who think they’re clever when dismissing Klevius as not understanding that islam doesn’t have representatives!
*** Remember that all women are slaves in islam. This is why OIC (57 islamist jihadi nations in the UN) have their own “human rights” (Sharia)!
A telling example of the deep confusion re. Human Rights & islam:
Warna Hettiarachchi Ontario, Canada (sic): "Western Liberal laws and Human Rights do not work for Sri Lanka, any more than they are ignored and renders useless for Middle-Eastern countries where Islamic Laws are the local norm and standard. World media and journalists, here is a challenge for you: Write about the penal codes and deterrent punishment schemes applied in Arab nations, including beheading, stoning-to-death, chopping off fingers and limbs for criminal activities as being viewed by Western nations and society as “barbaric”, “Inhuman” and “against human-rights”. Then you should carry out a 10-year campaign to convince those nations to change their laws to become more “forgiving” and “crime-friendly” as yours. Oh wait, that will never happen – as the Arab nations are oil and financially RICH and they have loads of money to buy you, your hand and your pen off. Aljazeera, BBC, CNN, Guardian, Times and other electronic and print media organizations, please note… Am I not correct? You Western & Oil rich-countries-funded media organizations want to control the world’s political, energy and financial resources to their own monetary and controlling advantages. The same ethics and worldwide-rules together with Mass Media Corporations have also FAILED to highlight the CHILDREN being dragged away by LTTE Tamil Tiger Terrorists to be brainwashed and trained as Suicide Bombers and LTTE front-line brigade? The UN and the world KNEW about LTTE using Child soldiers as young as 13 years!! Where were the Western Nations, particularly the Liberal Canadian PM Paul Martin, Jean Chrétien, Gordon Brown, David Miliband, Eric Solheim, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and the EU, etc??"
Klevius answer to Warna Hettiarachchi: They were exactly where you are! Denying the logic of Negative Human Rights! Why? Because admitting the logic of Negative Human Rights would make the one missing from your list, Mr X “president” of USA plus all muslim political representatives political criminals, because if they “respect” islam they don’t respect the US Constitution & democracy!
Human Right based on Negative HUman Rights aren't "Western" but global! The irresistable ideology of Negative Rights rests on its complete lack of ideology!
So why aren't they more supported/enforced? Because of 1) ignorance, 2) socialists don't like freedom (see the most important sociological paper from the last Century) 3) political greed, & of course, 4) the madness of "monotheist" "symphatizers" (read cowards)! If you really need to limit yourself (see Klevius definition of religion) pls keep it for yourself!
Klevius history lesson: The Tamil terrorists are rooted in Arabic islamic slave raid/trade history long time ago (before the Western "colonialism" which, btw, brough education & stopped slavery), pretty much as the Hutu/Tutsi history in Africa. Also consider that e.g. Hinduism after having met with evil islam became much worse itself. It's the trademark of islam (i.e. Mohammedanism) to infiltrate via the ruling class, & when the evil seed is sawn the ruling class either become muslims or "half muslims" like e.g. in India & China etc.
According to K S Lal, Slaves were abducted or captured by marauders (Subuktigin, Balban), they were sold by jealous or needy relatives (Iltutmish), and they were purchased by slave-traders to be sold for profit (Aibak). These methods were known to Muslim rulers in India. All these and many other methods were employed by them and their nobles in making slaves in India. The phenomenon and its application was shocking to the Hindu mind; the Muslims, however, thought otherwise. According to Ibn Khaldun, the captives were “brought from the House of War to the House of Islam under the rule of slavery, which hides in itself a divine providence; cured by slavery, they enter the Muslim religion with the firm resolve of true believers…”1 Muslims took pride in enslaving people.
Islamic parasitism was born out of sponging on slaves & islam ruined not only the whole African continent but also much of southern & central Asia. It’s really disgusting when you now read on Wikipedia that “The Kaffirs were brought to Sri Lanka by the Portuguese, Dutch and British” (sic)! All of this is outlined & explained in my so far unpublished book Roots Guide. However, due to islamic fascism & its collaborators I’ve got no chance to publish it. I tried Bjorn Ulvaeus' (ABBA) publishing company (because he seemed to be defending Ayaan Hirsi Ali). However, he was apparently too a coward to pick it up although it seems the head of the company supported it. I don’t know…
As to muslims, islam was enforced upon you before you were born and the door out (freedom) locked with a key (Sharia) that has been thrown away (apostasy ban)!
Citizens of the world, if you care abt freedom ALWAYS vote for politicians AGAINST islam, the worst crime ever!
No matter what the agenda otherwise is, the most important vote now is for freedom & against islam! Negative rights for a positive future, instead of the ongoing ultimate collapse of Western media & Western politics in front of the worst of evils, islam (and what abt non-Western media etc?!).
Politicians ignorant abt islam but some have the courage at least to say stop when they realize what's going on
UK Labour MP Jim Fitzpatrick and his wife walked out of an islamic marriage after discovering they would have to sit in separate rooms. Jim Fitzpatrick also revealed his ignorance abt sex segregation by saying that "gender segregation" is a sign of increasing radicalisation and was damaging to social cohesion".
Klevius comment: "Gender segregation" is a PC oxymoron. Gender cannot be segregated simply because it's already segregated! Gender implies a cultural relation to something that HAS TO BE DIFFERENT. Sex, on the other hand, is a physical distinction. If you're physically female you can play women's football no matter what your "gender" is! Gender replaced sex in PC language firstly because feminists wanted to keep women as their protecterd poilitical constituency, and secondly because it suited main stream chauvinists, islam etc. quite well when they eventually realized what Klevius has said abt feminism for decades! Some "feminists" haven't got it though, so they got intellectually schizophrenic. And islam is all abt sex segregation as Klevius has repeatedly warned!
However, muslim leaders of course insisted sex segregation is "traditional" at Islamic weddings as well as in mosques. They were surprised that MP Jim Fitzpatrick was unaware of the fact, although his London constituency is already one third muslim!
Klevius comment: How many equally naive politicians do we have out there performing evil political correctness in the service of the worst crime ever against humanity?! And these ignorant people are "disgusted" when they see Klevius "islamophobic" pages! Would be fun if it wasn't so sad.
The following products may be desired by some people:
Politicians free from islam/muslim bias
Muslim free neighborhoods
Education free from islamic propaganda
Programs free from muslim "comedians"
News agencies free from islamist bias
Demand usually result in production. However, the marketing of such products might be tricky. And ghow many true muslims are there really? Any?!
Klevius suggests that "ex-muslims" of all sorts join negative rights for a positive future!
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Why are muslims called "Asians" & islam, the worst crime ever, called a "faith"?! And why is Badman evil?
Mr X "president" respects both islam & its evil Caliph! But he certainly doesn't respect the victims of islam, does he!
The tip of the top of a gigantic iceberg of media suppressed suffering caused by islam
Rifqa Bary (US) & Khyra Ishaq (UK) are both girl victims of islam, on top of a growing islamic iceberg! However, whereas Rifqa Bary is still alive Khyra Ishaq didn't make it...
Whose fault?! Yours of course, who sit silent while the evil islamic cancer is growing!!! It was because it was a muslim family that the social workers didn't intervene!!! Just like the police doesn't intervene if the street bullies are muslim thugs! What's more, when I lectured abt child protection in Sweden, the Government's islamic "expert" listened & questioned carefully, and then afterwards proposed that Swedish muslims should be immunized against the Swedish child protection act! This immunization is called Sharia!
Remember that in both US & UK non-muslim people have been officially accused of not hindering muslims from leaving islam (sic)!
BBC sets new low mark for anti-journalism when it falsely misleads the public abt immigration & abt home education & the notoriously evil Badman report
When negatively talking abt immigrants only East Europeans (i.e. Polish) are mentioned. Nothing abt muslims from islamic countries which are the main immigrants in UK! And when talking abt Khyra Ishaq, the girl who didn't want to be a muslim & therefore was starved to death by her muslim step father & muslim convert mother, BBC misses that the reason was Sharia islam, not "homeschooling". Instead BBC repeats the wellknown notorious lie (originally deliberately referred to in a Government report for smearing home educators) that home educated children more often have welfare records, when, in fact, this distortion of the stats is nothing but the selfevident fact that so many handicapped children ALSO populate home-schools! The real reason why home education is chased by the state bureaucrats is that home-schooled children perform so much better both socially & educationally! Moreover, by letting the parents decide over the education of their children, so much less room is left for state propaganda, such as e.g. how nice islam is etc. While islamists can continue their racist/sexist hate propaganda in "faith schools"!
Read the most important sociological paper written in the last Century
and while you're aroused, why don't open your eyes for the disgusting truth behind the Swedish child "protection" act LVU!
Here's a new political agenda for everyone who supports freedom under the Negative Human Rights:
Many people critical of the socialist social state keeps yelling "those secularist socialists". However, Klevius proposes secularist non-socialism combined with redistribution of wealth (progressive taxation on certain consumption) & a complete stop for the racist/sexist use of "religion"! If you really want to cheat with "religion", keep it for yourself, don't contaminate others with your problem. That should be your only "religious right"!
Monday, February 22, 2010
Muslim born apostate, Mr X "president" & Saudi puppet, says he "respects" islam, the worst ideological crime ever on the planet through 1400 yrs - but what abt muslims whom he kills on a daily basis?!
Amnesty International's road from Human Rights to submission under the Saudi world Caliph & islamic Sharia
As you know (if you have read the net's by far best conceptualization of Negative Human Rights), what we call Human Rights are in fact nothing if deflated from the basis of all freedom, the Negative Rights! However, due to ignorance in general & socialist negative-rights-phobia in particular, Human Rights are constantly slipping down the slope towards the islamic Leviathan.
Salil Shetty, a jihadist (fighting for islam, the worst crime ever) from UN who will succeed the contemporary Amnesty leader, muslim jihadist Irene Khan: "When new census data was released for India, the headlines were not that the population growth rate was unacceptably high in all religious groups. Instead, the headline was that the Muslim population was growing at a more rapid pace. to any rational person, this fact would simply indicate that the Muslim population in India suffers from a high concentration of poverty, womens' illiteracy and more broadly, social exclusion. Instead, many media houses, themselves controlled by Hindu fundamentalist thinking, preferred to use this to generate more hate towards the already beleaguered minority groups.
Klevius comment: 1) Only islam has a written ideology that aims for nothing less than racist abuse & genocide of non-muslims. Moreover, it's extremely easy to point out that IT WAS ISLAM that caused these "beleaguered minority groups"! 2) Everyone with a rudimentary general knowledge abt history should know that the Hindus became worse BECAUSE OF ISLAM & ITS MONUMENTAL ATROCITIES IN INDIA! Either you're plain dumb or you don't differ from Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, etc. other than that they're more honest abt it!
Educate yourself out of your bottomless ignorance abt islam, the worst crime known to history & the worst threat to freedom & humanity!
Origin of islam
How are rapetivism & sex segregation related?
Friday, February 19, 2010
Mr X “president” promotes anti-human rights & islamic terrorists, while BBC, Wikipedia etc. continue their lies abt "islamic science"
Mr X “president” has the nerve to defend the Islamic Uyghur jihadists by referring to their “human rights”, well knowing that islamic “human rights” are the very opposite to the real 1948 Human Rights declaration! Whereas the latter defend freedom the former deny freedom!
At Mr X "president's" right ear his Nation of Islam mentor who is deeply involved with the Saud gangster family. At his left ear his friend, the leader of US muslims who also happens to be a follover of Saudi Wahabism! Underneath we have his fellows at CAIR (an influential US islamist organization now busy fighting a poor 17 yr old girl who doesn't want to be a muslim anymore, & who fears her muslim father will kill her because of this) who reward a US muslim, Muzzammil Hassan, who beheaded his divorcing wife, just like the islamic Kosovo terrorist Ibrahim Shkupolli did in Finland!
Mr X "president's marriage with OIC
The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) cited Rashad Hussain (Mr X “president’s newly appointed envoy to OIC, i.e. the Organization of the Islamic Conference which hides Sharia under the title “islamic human rights”) as saying that an islamic terrorist was the victim of “politically motivated persecutions for to squash dissent.” Rashad Hussain’s comment came in connection with Sami al-Arian, a university professor and activist sentenced in 2006 for conspiring to aid islamic Jihad. U.S. (Attorney-General John Ashcroft) described this particular one as “one of the most violent terrorist organizations in the world.”
HOW COME THAT ISLAM IS NEVER THE CAUSE TO THE ATROCITIES THE PERPETRATORS REFER TO ISLAM?! IF A THUG BRAKES INTO YOUR HOME & OCCUPIES IT, DO YOU THEN CONSIDER YOUR POSSESSIONS AS RIGHTLY BELONGING TO THIS THUG?!
BBC, Wikipedia etc. lying abt "islamic science"
Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius - see Origin of islam - or by digging history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open historical "secret" of islam's fuel: (booty, sex & slavery) & due cultural & technological impotency. So when someone talks abt "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most people don't check these lies & haven't all read Klevius as yet.
The last example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious islamic mass murderer & slaverer (one of the worst known to history - also called the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned & let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.
But BBC & Wikipedia happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)! Check for youraself while I go puking.
The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil & only pope of islam - and needs to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be released & his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task, doesn't it.
It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?
Monday, February 15, 2010
Has there ever been a more hypocritical & evil moron in the White House? And when do you finally realize it?!
Mr X "president", the apostate (?!) muslim born Saudi puppet
See what a muslim thinks abt the disgusting Mr X’s” first call as “president”, the Saudi caliphate:
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis (American Chronicle): "Saudi Arabia is a factory of inhuman hatred, evil rancor, vulgar behaviour, deep ignorance, compact inanity, and utter bestialization. Never ever in the World History has the Humankind testified to such an ulcerous enmity of the Knowledge, Science, Art and Philosophy. Yet, the territory was not always the realm of the utmost barbarism. Degradation and decay came with the gradual rise and prevalence of the Hanbal pseudo-Muslim school of jurisprudence, the pathetic theological system of Ibn Taimiya, and the Satanic cult of Abdel Wahhab"
Klevius comment: The Saudis aren’t “pseudo-muslims” but the heartland of majority Sunni muslims! Muslims have always fought one another, & now it’s the Saudis with their White House puppet, who use the US war machine for getting rid of Shia muslims!
DON'T YOU GET IT?! IT'S ISLAM THAT'S THE MOST EVIL! COMMUNISM, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, POL POT, RWANDA GENOCIDE (in fact induced by islam - see Klevius Roots Guide) etc ALL FADE COMPARED TO THE INCOMPREHENSIBLE MASS OF ATROCITIES THROUGH 1400 yrs UNDER ^ BECAUSE OF A SINGLE EVIL IDEOLOGY CALLED ISLAM, OR MOHAMMEDANISM IF YOU LIKE!
Mr X "president" joins Al'Qaeda in his Saudi inspired killing rampage against Shia muslims!
Yemen's president Ali Abdullah Saleh is, in praxis, an Al-Qaeda affiliate, as is Ali Muhsin, who commands the armed forces fighting the Shia muslims. The US "president" now - on the order of the Saudi Caliph - kills Shia muslims aided by Al-Qaeda while it's presented as a "war against Al'Qaeda"!
Question: Is it possible for a muslim to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution?
Klevius answer: According to islamic Shariah it's absolutely not.
Sharia 1.9: "The obligation of men and jinn to perform acts of obedience is established by Allah's having informed them of it upon the tongues of the prophets and not by unaided human reason. Allah sent the prophets and manifested the truth of their messages by unmistakable, inimitable miracles. The prophets have communicated Allah's commands prohibitions, promises, and warnings, and it is obligatory for mankind and jinn to believe in what they have conveyed." Klevius comment: "Unaided human reason" means Negative Human Rights!
The US president is the Commander in Chief of the US military. The oath for joining the U.S. military is:
"I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic"!
However, the islam respecting" Mr X "president" complies better with Shariah 2.1: "Allah sent Muhammad, the Qurayshite unlettered prophet, to deliver Allah's inspired message to the entire world, Arabs and non-Arabs, jinn and mankind, superceding and abrogating all previous religious systems with the Prophet's Sacred Shariah. Allah has obligated men and jinn to believe everything the Prophet has informed us concerning this world and the next"!
Klevius comment: And as you know from having read your Klevius, there's no Allah in Mohammedanism, but only the evil messenger with his evil message!
Klevius concluding remark: We need to get rid of the senseless, racist monotheist destruction of the free world. And the only way to do so effectively is to cure that very ignorance that fertilizes evil, such as e.g. Mr X " president", the Saudi "king" etc.
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Islam is evil - that's why OIC calls Sharia "human rights" & why Geert Wilders is prosecuted for telling the truth!
If you, like Mr X "president" (the Saudis' puppet) really know, yet still respect islam (i.e. Mohammedanism) you inevitably disrespect Human Rights & the freedom basis of the US constitution! Europe is again submitting to fascism & the muslim born fascism respecting apostate(?!) moron in the White House won't certainly help!
Islam is based on slavery (parasitism) & this is why slavery could never be abolished from islamic teaching. The ridiculous racist idea abt Monotheism started with slavery, & Mohammedanism islam only became the "last" ultimate form of it in an environment where caravan piracy, not farming, was the natural choise for an immoral racist/sexist people. The real clash between Mohammedanism & Jews, however, was that the Mohammedans threatened the commercial (slavery)network that the Jews had established!
You’re truly a disgusting racist/sexist fascist if you hypocritically blink the undeniable facts & due logic below!
Klevius ultimate Human Rights tutorial for YOU who don’t understand the depth of islam’s evilness (although you might well think you do, you moron)!
1 The very definition of the US Constitution & true Human Rights rests on the right to freedom.
2 The right to freedom is a negative human right, i.e. an empty space that only YOU should be allowed to fill. And whereas freedom of speech is a primary/negative right, the right to vote, for example, is a secondary/positive right (however, your right not to vote is a negative right - see Klevius definition of Negative Human Rights for some more fundamental conceptualizations).
A positive right isn't always really a human right but often a social imposition, although it may sometimes appear benign & even desirable. Take the lousy (compared to e.g. its neighboring top ranked Finland) Swedish school system. Under the title "right to education" Sweden continues its compulsory school attendancy (not necessarily education), while in most countries (except Germany, of course, whose school refugees now get asylum in US), incl. Finland, it's not. And because children as minors lack agency of their own the Swedish state easily ends up as the winning interpretor of "the right of the child" (see Angels of Antichrist, the most important sociological paper of the last century, & Pathological Symbiosis in Swedish CP legislation).
3 Islam lacks human rights alltogether because it can't let women free & because it’s totalitarian & forbids leaving islam - i.e. islam presumes that Koran/Sharia should rule all aspects of life! Moreover, according to racist islam, a non-muslim cannot be equal with a muslim, & a muslim woman can never be equal with a muslim man. Instead of human rights islam therefore has Sharia law, now hidden as "islamic human rights":
4 OIC (an islamist organization constituting 57 islamic nations with Sharia inscribed in their constitutions) has changed the name of Sharia to “human rights” (sic) in the so called Cairo declaration! By accepting this gross violation of the UN 1948 Human Rights declaration UN has 1) abandoned OIC citizens' (muslims & non-muslims) Human Rights, while 2) aiding these very same islamist nations & their representatives in the West by applying Human Rights on those who actively subvert these very rights.
5 To make the confusion even worse OIC has copied much of the language from the real Human Rights, for the purpose of misleading the ignorant public. According to the islamist Cairo declaration, "all men are equal in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities". In this context (Sharia) "basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities" simply means sexist restrictons on the lives of girls/women. It's medieval sex segregation & your (only?!) expert/source on the subject is Klevius (see e.g. From Klevius without love)! It will explain to you the senseless confusion re. "sex" & "gender". People write abt "gender segregation" without having a clue what they're talking abt. You can't "segregate" gender, moron, they're already segregated! 'Gender' is like 'relation'. Try segregating a relation & it stops being a relation! Did I already say you-re a moron if you even try! But comfort yourself that the world is full of morons like you - most of them occupied with "gender studies" etc. Only sex can be segregated, dude!
6 By believing in islam a muslim denies Human Rights! Whereas Human Rights "totalitarianism" positively defends the fredom of ALL, islamic totalitarianism negatively restricts freedom & forever conserves cultural inequality between the sexes (see What's sex segregation?). Although true Human Rights cover muslims, a true muslim cannot represent Human Rights. In fact, thia is ultimate anti-democracy, & constitutes the worst judicial fraud on the planet!
A believer in islam/Mohammedanism has the right to freedom of speech but not to a democratic vote. You cannot vote for the destruction of the vote, can you!
So although muslims can be protected by West's Human Rights, islam cannot be protected by "freedom of religion" simply because islam's apostasy ban etc is the very opposite to "freedom of religion" & thus a grave violation of true Human Rights!
The very same OIC has also managed to abuse UN (which was originally built on the real human rights which defend freedom against evil ideologies such as islam) so to criminalize criticism of islam (i.e. to criticize the worst crime ever against humanity through 1400 years of slavery, rapetivism & genocides).
(Intellectual copyright Klevius)
PS Before the contamination of Mohammedanism/islam in the West I used to see black people as - people. However, now I tend to see black people as potential muslim racists! It's really a pity!
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Is Obama the oldfashioned & technologically lagging* BMW which is still struggling to catch up with tech on the Prius 1997 level?! And while being so inmcompetent still manages to fool people that the opposite is the case!
This is how Swedish Aftonbladet uses its racist non-journalism!
The headline says every second car in Sweden fails the annual safety test. This is then connected to a picture of Toyota's emblem (something you almost NEVER see otherwise - on the contrary, low quality (compared to Japanese) brands such as e.g. VW, Audi, BMW*, Renault, Peugeot, MB, Volvo** etc are always generously exposed in positive images while Japanese brands are usually carefully hidden - counts grand pianos as well. Whereas the Steinway label is always shown on TV, the better brand, Yamaha, when chosen by the performer - i.e. those who aren't satisfied with the Steinway usually offered - is carefully avoided). However, the truth is that the Toyota's turned out to be the safest (together with other Japanese brands, as they've always been, year after year, while European brands occupy the bottom of the list)!
see the Swedish car fire list
* More than 100 yrs ago most cars were made in the technologically easiest way: A 6-in line engine directly connected to a gear box from which a long drive shaft propels the rear wheels. This is stone age tech & only defendable on special cars for special purposes & constellations! Volvo was long one of the last dinosauries but dropped this concept in the early 1990s. But BMW has managed to make a "drivability" (BMWs are notorious for bad drivability immediately when the road is wet or not clean enough!) & "quality" (average Euro standard on bigger models, below avergae when it comes to Minis) & "tech" (absolutely nothing - even their racing cars use Japanese parts when it comes to high tech -. Did you know that M3 (which is only rear wheel driven) for example, needed OLD rear axis tech from Mitsubishi EVO for to be able to perform!) imago on purely subjective grounds. READ MORE HERE
** Unless, of course, they have Yamaha engine & Toyota's gearbox (as the more expensive Volvo's usually have). However, because of the lousy overall quality the car beahves badly anyway. Just ask the Swedish mother who saw the family's new Volvo XC90 (car of the year!?) bursting into flames after she had parked it and, luckily, already left the kids at school!
This constant misinformation to the ignorant public abt car safety is fueled by a racist attemt to cover up for technical shortcomings compared to the Japanese. Prius, Toyota's green tech wonder, revolutionaized car production 1997 (YES, 1997!) by introducing a whole new technological concept that makes non-polluting electrical driving possible where there are many children& other people, while also making it possible to regain energy lost in braking. This latter feature was new & should be credited not blamed, when there are still some room to optimize the software.
The faulty accelerator was a non-Japanese product on some (not Prius) cars made OUTSIDE Japan by an American manufacturer!
How many have died or being victimized by Western cars with their low quality standars through the decades?! Volvo, BMW, Audi etc, are notorious for car fires, accelerating cruise controls, electrical faults etc. Due to the overall difference in greenishness & quality Western car proiducers owe the Japanese ones a lot!
Non-Japanese cars burst into flames far more often than Japanese brands!
YOU ARE A VICTIM OF SENSELESS, RACIST, SEXIST (& sometimes just ignorant) MEDIA MISINFORMATION!So what steers it? Sorry you socialists but it's the capital. And you're the worst capitalists (see the most important sociological paper from the last century, Klevius' "Angels of Antichrist"!
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
These evil men & women "respect" islam & fight "muslims"!
Why do we call cowardice submission under Mohammed’s alleged evil words/deeds, islam?!
The Koran was compiled LONG after Mohammed of whom we have only alleged anecdotes at the best. Mohammed ISN'T EVEN MENTIONED before Malik decided to use his name as an excuse for his bloodthirsty conquering. No one, I SAID NO ONE, can deny this scientific fact!
Islam ought to be called what it has always been called before the time of political correctness, i.e. Mohammedanism. The Mohammedan ideology effectively & completely cuts out “god”, “Allah” (or whatever), hence leaving us only with Mohammed’s deeds & words! This is also why Klevius always has argued that it’s not a religion albeit it likes to pretend being one for the purpose of luring benefits from ignorant people & greedy politicians etc.
A “muslim” who thinks s/he gets a spiritual connection to a “god” via Mohammedanism cheats her/himself because that “god” belongs to some other faith, not islam/Mohammedanism. Any "spirituality" in the Koran is just copied from Judaism, Buddhism, Konfutsianism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity etc! The very idea of Mohammedanism/islam is to CUT OFF ANY GOD INCL. ALLAH SO THE PATRIARCHAL RULING ON EARTH IS UNCHALLENGED & SAFE! In this strive the Mohammedans have much in common with fundamentalist Christianity such as, for example Catholicism which still doesn't even consider giving same rights to women!
CURE YOUR BOTTOMLESS IGNORANCE ABT MOHAMMEDANISM/ISLAM! Yes, in the end of the day, you'll be not only surprised how mislead you've been, but disgusted as well!
Origin of Mohammedanism/islam
Some facts abt Mohammedanism that need to be constantly repeated, not the least because of media', Wikipedia's, politician's etc continuously ongoing deliberate disinformation:
Robberer's & rapists don't do science! That's why THERE ISN'T A SINGLE Mohammedan/islamic scientific achievement! It wasn't Mohammedanism/islam that made science possible, it was Mohammedanism/islam that for the purpose of benefitting from it LET SOME SCIENTISTS CONTINUE if they submitted to islam!
Mohammedanism/islam, which is totalitarian & expansionist through reproduction, focuses on producing as many children (muslims) as possible while simultaneously making it impossible for these kids to be anything else than "muslims"!
A muslim woman isn't allowed to choose a non-muslim man, & a wife to a muslim man can never get (temporary) custody after divorce unless she commits to brainwash the children to become true muslims!
Mohammedanism/islam is completely impotent when it comes to technology. That's why the most famous Arabia products are made by a Finnish porcelain company named Arabia!
Talking abt technology, take a look at Klevius tech page which reveals, among many other things, how much more often non-Japanese cars burst into flames compared to Japanese ones!
MADE IN JAPAN RULES WHILE RACIST MEDIA AGAIN LIES TO YOU!
Klevius update on lousy non-Japanerse car parts
Some of the same Toyota Motor Corp. models recalled in the U.S., Europe and China, are on Japanese roads, but use a genuinly Japanese parts supplier (Nippon Denso) instead of the American CTS Corp. that produced the faulty parts behind the massive recalls. However, those U.S.-made Camrys which have accelerator pedals made in Japan are not affected by recalls. This info is extremely rare in the Western media, as are the recalls made by Renault etc low quality Western state sponsored car companies).