Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, August 05, 2015

How BBC screws you about sex slavery and other atrocities in islam - while smearing non religious countries whom Britiain attacked* first



* Following the conclusion of the First "Opium war" in 1842, Britain threatened China to grant it special privileges, including exclusive British use of coastal ports. Next in line was Japan.


BBC is continuously "forgetting" not only its own past but especially the evil past (and present) of islam's monstrous atrocities while Japan's possible (similar to almost all wars) atrocities are heavily focused on in the context of the annual Hiroshima day. Not to mention that Japan had at least the same right to be involved as Britain.

BBC continuously smears Chinese and Japanese while defending muslims, islam and Saudi Arabia. Why?


While others pay respect to the Japanese Hiroshima victims BBC accuses Japanese for sex slavery.That's quite hefty considering how BBC continuously backs islamic sex slavery in the past as well as now.

Interestingly BBC's only informant tells us that she was "grabbed by a Korean and a Japanese". A telling example of the divisive effects of British and US involvement on one side of the people and Japan on the other.

Islam/Koran is notorious for sex slavery, yet BBC keeps silent about it. The only search result is the Islamic State which BBC considers "unislamic". 


Shinto has no Koran book about the "right" to take sex slaves, yet BBC seems very interested in trying to make you believe so.


BBC grabs whatever straw it finds (or not) for criticizing China and Japan. Much like they grab whatever straw (or none) to boast islam and muslims while hiding their atrocities. Islam is always good and there are no evil muslims because muslims are vaccinated by islam so to give them lifelong immunity against criticism. And if a muslim is evil it's not because he's a muslim - it's because of Bush, the Sionist Jews, the "colonizers" or the "islamophobes".


BBC also finds plenty of news time for reporting the Brits about how Beijing's Olympics song possibly was "stolen" although most people don't find anything that could come even close to any copyright infringements. Even BBC's own reporter sounded doubtful. So why even try?! Is it all about China not being enough islamofascist friendly for the taste of BBC?

Without any notable reaction from BBC, Sikh and Hindu organizations signed an open letter claiming that sex-grooming gangs "predominantly originate from a Pakistani muslim community, while their victims are almost always of a White, Hindu or Sikh background".

Klevius comment: How could it possibly not be islam when that's the most elaborated abuse ideology around? Islam seems to be defined as 'without negative consequences' although islam itself eagerly points out such negative consequences of the "disbelievers" infidels" or "wrong believers" and proudly tells us that we all should be muslims and if we don't we are just crap - i.e. we are no longer "innocent" and therefore the legitimate target for whoever lunatic muslims. This is what your imam means when he says (usually via BBC to make it sound more serious) that 'islam forbids attacks on innocent people'.

Islam is all about sex apartheid (sexism) and "hatred against "infidels" (racism). In fact, Klevius blog Origin if islam - the worst crime ever against humanity, started as a blog (2002) against segregation, racism and sexism.


Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, May 06, 2015

Some "islamophobia" before Ed Milliband introduces sharia compliant "blasphemy" laws against the Brits' Human Rights as in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan

Politicians in bed with islamofascism is a disaster for Human Rights

A vote for Ed Milliband won't help victims of muslim sexual predators in accordance with the Koran

The social state is much more devastating to children than any private company - and waste much more money!

A UK mother who found 125 names of potential (most/all muslims?) sex abusers on her daughter’s mobile phone claims she was told by police in Rotherham it would be a "breach of the girl’s human rights" if they investigated.

Klevius translation: Note that we are talking about underage girls who would have no Human Rights protection against social state interventions (aided by the police) whatsoever (to understand this and the tiltle see Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis). What they really meant was that it would be a breach of the muslims' human rights (read "diversity policy") if they investigated. And this is the dilemma - Human Rights cover all, including muslims, whereas sharia opposes Human Rights - which fact doesn't hinder muslims (and their supporters) from abusing Human Rights when it serves themselves.!

The parasitic social state that feeds itself on behalf of the taxpayers and children while giving a s--t to non-muslim girls abused by muslims. Don't approve a penny before getting rid of the parasites residing in the social state! And one thing is definitive: Ed Milliband will continue supporting these parasites.

Rotherham has been totally dominated by Labour since World War 2. Compare the total dominance of the Swedish social democrats who created the disastrous Swedish social state all the way from Gunnar and Alva Myral's "social hygiene"  in the 1930s and due eugenics to the explosive tax injection in the 1970s and due birth of the modern social state. Some results: The Swedish "girl problem" (which Klevius has written about since 1993), high child/youth criminality, and a school system that 2015 is classified among the worst within OECD and heavily criticized in a recent OECD report. Yet Sweden has compulsory school attendance and doesn't admit homeschooling at all for normal children (alone in Europe together with Germany whose Hitler imposed law is still in power).

Learn more on Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis


Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending children.

Islam is the only remaining legal excuse for hateful racism and sexism. If you are a racist or sexist then your only non-criminal option is islam.


Where others have to adapt to goodness (Human Rights) muslims can continue being evil (sharia) because of islam's status as a "religion".

But the troublesome fact remains that islam isn't only incapable of approving of the most basic of Human Rights, islam is also guilty of 1400 years of constant murdering, genocides, slavery and rapetivism. Islam is a Pandora's box and the only hope is the extinction of its main evil message.

BBC's diversion tactics for the purpose of belittling islamic slavery genocides - the worst ideological crime ever against humanity

BBC's aim seems to be to make people believe that "sex slavery was/is all over the place" - i.e. not only islam.

Today islam is the only allowed ideology that approves of sexual violence/rapetivism.

Sexual violence is a weapon and a strategy that is approved by islam and therefore used by muslims to "justify" it. In other words, when non-muslim traffickers know they are criminals, muslim criminals just point to the Koran, hadiths and Muhammad.

As an exemplifying consequence, out of 585 peace treaties since 1990 only 17 mention sexual violence/rape. And out of 300 ceasefire deals only 6 consider such kind of sexual violence a violation of the deal.


Islam started with Muhammad's genocide of all the Jews in Medina 1400 years ago and continued its violent attacks until today. Islam's victims throughout all these years are more than any other evil ideology. What we call Judaism also started with genocide (the slaughtering of the Canaanites) but due to mainly matrilineality  never managed to produce numbers comparable with islam. This is what Klevius calls the Vagina/Penis divide, i.e. that a man can have more "offspring" than a woman. A muslim man makes a muslim - not a "muslim" woman.A "muslim" woman is an "inferior" being according to Muhammad and islam.

The main body of those who today call themselves muslims consists of people whose female ancestors had been enslaved by muslim males thanks to Human Rights violating sharia which makes the muslim man the determinant for muslimhood while apostasy ban makes it impossible to leave islam. A woman married to a muslim man is, according to islamic sharia forced to reproduce only muslims.

BBC has slowly started understanding that islam isn't just a "religion" but a pure sex slave "religion" and in their programs is now busy pushing out whatever they can find of non-muslim examples of slavery and sex abuse for the simple purpose of thereby trying to dilute islam's horrifying ideological essence and history - and islam's contemporary and continuing sex slavery ideology.

Yes, there has been slavery in different forms even before islam. However, only islam made slavery (parasitism) its main ideology, inscribed it in its main book and violently expanded through slavery, and finally always declined  into the deepest misery when the supply was limited - as was the case when the West in the 19th century toppled the Ottoman slave "empire" which was itself created through islamic slavery. Or more than thousand years ago when some half a million black slaves in what is now Iraq revolted against their Sunni muslim slave "owners". Islam's "golden ages" have all rested on unlimited supply of slaves through human trafficking, slave raids etc.


Klevius: OIC, the Islamic State, muslim sharia racism/sexism etc are all around us, indeed. So why do you contribute to this evil?! 



Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"


Muslim hypocrisy like the one expressed by BBC's Mishal Husain could be just a laugh - were it not for its connection to islamic evil. Islam has only one authority and that is muslimhood. So declaring yourself a muslim automatically adds to the "democratic" support of islamic evil.



Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Thursday, August 18, 2005

US racial segregation persecuted and detained 120.000 innocent Shinto-Japanese while now welcoming, and even boosting Islam!?

You may also note that according to Ratzinger (now Pope) 1997, Islam features "a very marked subordination of woman to man". Klevius: Does the Pope mean Islam should be castrated?

Oil-fueled (by Pan-Arabic oil-billionaires) racist/sexist totalitarian and fascist Islamo-black Hip Hop culture (also see Shinto high tech vs Hip Hop vulgo) isn't perhaps that cool after all if you know anything about its background! And how much do these fascists harm other blacks and their inter-race/sex relations? Black US Islamists! Why do you try to steal the colors of your non-Muslim brothers and sisters?! For a deeply informed and focused (albeit extremely brief - you have to look up the details for yourself, but avoid the biased "answers" from the (pbuh)-people!) background on the evil roots and fascist (i.e. denial of equality to "infidels") heritage of Pan-Arabic Islam (incl. today's so called "moderate"/"liberal" Islam), see previous posting below! Not only Muslim Brotherhood, Galloway's Respect/Socialist Workers Party and Hitler's Socialist Workers Party all have the same political, leftist and totalitarian/fascist roots in common! Islam in every form (via Koran) belongs to this unfortunate, but for detached and asocial individuals (and cold-hearted politicians), apparently so appealing evil tradition. So let's look at the history from another, Shinto angle of view! Islam has always been technologically impotent, an economic eunuck, but eager to reproduce, even through pure rapetivism. This has never been economically beneficial for Islamic states without natural resources that non-Muslim "Infidels" can dig up for them. So why not now establish a Nation of Shinto. Although I’m not a Japanese I could be its first member – you don't have to be an Arab to join Nation of Islam, do you?!


Persecution of Shintoists in US

"...the Japanese American Experience outlines the largest violation of individual's rights by the United States government of the 20th century. It details the World War II experiences of 120,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry who were forced to leave their homes and businesses on the West Coast and Hawaii, and live in desolate camps located in seven states west of the Mississippi River. Japanese American community leaders were taken into custody without charge and without trial; some were even held on Ellis Island. Ultimately, the FBI concluded that there were no acts of sabotage or disloyalty by Japanese Americans."

Why do we talk so much about, and encourage fascist/racist/sexist Islam (we don't use to encourage Satanism although it's also popular among weird youth etc) and so little about Shinto (perhaps one of the oldest religions ever, probably rooted beyond the Jomon culture some 13.000 years ago - see Definition of religion and Out of Africa as "Pygmies" and back as global "Mongoloids")?
And why do we talk so much about "Negroids/blacks" and so little about "Mongoloids"?


Racial discrimination against Japanese before Pearl Harbour

"Like the Chinese, the Japanese had been welcomed at first as a source of cheap labor, but shortly thereafter, became targets of anti-Asian campaigns, maligned as the "yellow peril." They inherited much of the new prejudice directed previously against the Chinese, especially as the Japanese moved from itinerant farm laborers to become owners of farms and small businesses. Discriminatory laws passed during the early l900s denied the Japanese the right to become citizens, to own land, and to marry outside of their race. In addition, they could not buy homes in certain areas and were barred from jobs in certain industries. Some could only send their children to segregated schools, and in 1924, immigration from Japan was halted altogether."


and after

The Japanese were registered and given numbered tags. Many who were given as little as 48 hours notice to sell their possessions and to dispose of their property. Losses incurred during this time were estimated in the billions of dollars.


Klevius comment: Hawai became the first US state without an ethnic majority. The Japanese constitute the largest group and the racial tensions are almost extinct. But what about e.g. the racist African town project in Detroit, or consider a sexist/racist/totalitarian Arab/Islamic Sharia state in the US?!

Youth's involvement in racial tension, sexism, and totalitarian Islam is, of course, a by-product of detached relations to their families (see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship). It has almost become a (false) rule that teenagers should abandon their families and let their peers foster them. This development has been enforced by the modern "social state" populated mainly with women (see What is sex segregation?) who now "take care" (without real relations) of other people's children/youth.

I really want to deal with the world and its people without getting disturbed by racism and sexism in any form. Don't blame me for my skin color or my lack of tits, or my possession of a penis etc! I have Japanese and black friends but I have only encountered racial hostility from blacks*. That's very sad because I'd really love to approach blacks as Japanese, or whatever other people for that matter. And I don't have a need to feel more "valued" than others. Just equal! And I have no problem with musicians who are better than I, writers who are better than I, sporting performers who are better than I, better looking people, or anthropologists who are better than - well, I'm working hard on that one...

Also see: US Black Bimbos & Rambos in the service of Arab/Islam while black Africans suffer under it!

Klevius' holy (negative) human rights

Shinto/Japanese oil-saving high tech vs. oil-fueled Islamic/Arabic Koran schools


Black racism

"...blacks resent what is seen as Hispanics leapfrogging them up the socioeconomic ladder...
...many Hispanics say they are treated in racist ways by blacks.
Many Hispanics say they are being targeted for robbery by blacks who pick on undocumented workers, a group far less likely to report crimes to police


* Once when I visited a bank in San Francisco I was kind and polite towards the black lady behind the desk (some people may tell you they think I'm pretty social) in a way that could have made any black person in Europe smiling and positive. But not in the otherwise friendly San Francisco. Although my errand there took abt an hour she hardly even smiled but instead repeatedly warned me not to accidentally touch an item that was placed so close to where I had to sit that it was almost inevitable. The tension from her side (even before any touch) was best described as forced (almost) correctness. A couple of month later I was placing my Safeway card on the desk in front of the cashier after having placed my groceries there. The female, elderly black cashier was very hostile and blunt when she ordered me to pick it up and place it in her hand! I had never seen her before and I had never been treated in that way before in SF. Do I have to mention that I didn't behave in any way unpolitely before? Quite the contrary, and I certainly didn't expect her reaction. In fact her behavior made me connect to the clerk and other observations, which I now seem to share with many others. She certainly didn't know I was a temporary visitor. At another time I was waiting for the Muni and noticed the hostile look of some black teenage girls when they checked out some white girls I knew weren't known by them before. But I also encountered friendly blacks, mainly elderly males or young blacks, mainly from outside the US! One of the nicest, a young female student, I encountered on a bus trip. We had a long and nice conversation and I had almost forgotten the clerk in the bank, so I asked her how long she had lived in SF. She was from Africa on a temporary visit! Another friendly black, elderly male entered Muni, perhaps slightly affected by some liquid substance. He looked around, smiling, and asked: "Is there any seat for the mentally impaired?" I was occupying a side seat with a baby in my lap so I said: "Thanks, but I already got one!" He looked at me and my baby for a while, then smiled even more and gave us a hug! Of course he wasn't the only black from SF to be kind against me, though. But it felt a little bit weird to pay special attention when black people happened to be kind.

Friends in California have told me about growing black racism, sometimes open but mostly more subtle. Black officials and police officers who e.g. uses "bureaucratic" harrassment against non-blacks (and what abt Oakland polices shooting two Koreans, and other similar cases?!), unflexible and rigid black bus- and Muni drivers etc. I've also noticed that black gang youth in SF seem to have to express a more loud and intruding profile than those from Asian, Latino or other backgrounds. I remember a car full of screaming black young males, outside the Jesuit church, equipped with a boosted car stereo on full volume. I especially noticed the even louder refrain in the "tune": FUCK, FUCK, FUCK! (also see Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden) and San Francisco gang rape culture.


The double tragedy of Cindy Sheehan - is she now serving the evil ideology that killed her son?!

But there is one person who has never had any doubt that Bush is right, and therefore has moved heaven and earth to try to prevent democracy from getting an Iraqi foothold: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the head of al Qaeda in Iraq!

Klevius' sum up and suggestion: The more resistance against Bush, the worse for the girls/women suffering under Islam and the more support for Islamic evilness rooted in Medieval Mideast tribal robbery and fight for power. Japan, on the other hand, is the only surviving tribal society that is also high tech (Japanese art, litterature and music have been copied by Europeans and others from their first encounters) and extremely wealthy as a result of, not natural resources, but their own historical skills. Why not now balance evil contraproductive Islam with a Shinto Sisterhood or maybe Nation of Shinto (i.e. ancestor warship - compare the Vagina gate in the atom of kinship - spiced with a renewal of what de-sex segregated pre-Samuraj Shinto in many ways possessed, compare e.g. all the empresses before 600 A.D.) with exactly as big a mouth as Muslim Brotherhood, Nation of Islam and other senseless al-Qaeda supporters?

And remember, Japan's militaristic expansion was a direct result of Europe's and US' pressure to open up Japan for Western traders in the late 19th century! And the Shinto camel (Lexus) is now the world's best quality product!



.

No comments: