A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Iislam originated in a parasitic racist slavery ideology that abuses girls/ women for the purpose of reproducing its own evilness. And the nature of this evilness is still around and its anti-Human Rights approach is extremely easy to point out. Nor are these tenets extremist or fundamentalist in any sense. On the contrary, they constitute the very core of Islamic evilness and they are fully accepted by OIC, all muslims main world organization. This is why OIC doesn’t accept the Human Rights tenet that all humans, incl. girls/women and “infidels”, should be equal.
The Saudi dictator family uses evil islam as their main means to transform petro dollars into jihadic hate crimes around the world while simultaneously abusing Human Rights and “religious tolerance" for protecting evil islam and their own evil politics behind it.
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Yule is the modern English representative of the Old English words ġéol or ġéohol and ġéola or ġéoli, with the former indicating "(the 12-day festival of) Yule" (later: "Christmastide") and the latter indicating "(the month of) Yule", whereby ǽrra ġéola referred to the period before the Yule festival (December) and æftera ġéola referred to the period after Yule (January). Both words are thought to be derived from Common Germanic *jeχʷla-, and are cognate to Gothic (fruma) jiuleis and Old Norse (Icelandic and Faroese) jól (Danish and Swedish jul and Norwegian jul or jol) as well as ýlir. The celebration of Winter and Summer solstice is a Northern specialty that goes back to the original Finno-Ugric Europeans. And quite logically so when keeping in mind the "the circle of light" from 24 hours in summer and zero light in mid-Winter. This circle called 'jul' then also came to be synonymous for the Eurasian invention of the chariot wheel.
Klevius Yuletide quiz
How many rapes, murders and other islamic crimes has muslim Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud and his dictator family sponsored and even directly been involved with? Btw, Alwaleed bin Talal himself is also personally accused of rape but tries to escape behind Billions of Western oil dollars to avoid giving his DNA to the court..
Klevius warning to "cultural Christians" and "cultural muslims"
Being a Christian or a muslim today in effect actively supports OIC (the islamic Human Rights violating muslim organization that wants to implement Sharia worldwide and criminalize criticism against the worst hate crime ever) and the worst strain of Judaism, i.e. islamofascism (i.e. the original parasitic racist and sexist Sharia islam).
Klevius, as always, again suggests color etc blindness (i.e. against all kinds of segregation of people)
Hypocritical use of “racism” has led to “anti-racism” really pointing out that being a negrito or negroid or whatever somehow is a bad thing to be. Being “black” hence is used as a transparent cover for real racism through "ant-racist” propaganda and legal measures etc. (thankfully utilized by sometimes quite greedy "victims") In other words, “blacks” are “reminded' that their “blackness” contains a bad kernel that ought not to be talked about.
Otherwise, Good Yuletide to you mankind from one of its members named Klevius!
Friday, December 16, 2011
An islam organised political muslim terrorist boosted by OIC/Sharia and Alwaleed bin Talal & his Saudi dictator family
The disgusting racist/sexist Sharia practicing muslim islamist Jordine Amrani
BBC: The authorities are still trying to determine what motivated Amrani, a Belgian citizen, to go on his killing spree.Officials have ruled out organised political terrorism but have yet to determine why he opened fire.
Klevius: 1400 years of slam is the worst organized ideological hate crime that has ever existed on our planet. But people funded state media BBC seems not to get that whereas Breivik was just more or less a real looner Nordine Amrani acted in accordance with the written words in the Koran and the Hadits as well as followed the example of the fictive but hate mongering Mohammed. And Swedish Aftonbladet, who wrote extensively for month about "Breivik and the political right wing hate" don't even mention the muslim jihadist Amrani who murdered at least five and tried to murder more than even Breivik managed to do.
In other words, Amrani was exceptionally well organized in his hate and a main contributor to this Sharia racist hatred is the rape accused Saudi "prince" Alwaleed bin Talal (who btw doesn't want to reveal his DNA for the court) who has eagerly helped the Saudi dictator family to spread the disgusting and hateful islamic racist/sexist propaganda not only to Universities etc but also to schools streets community centers prisons etc.
Monday, December 12, 2011
Missed by Google News: Alwaleed bin Talal's rape/DNA case and the last anti-Sharia presidential candidate! Why? Islam propaganda of course.
These two "Westernized" (with "Western" oil tech money) muslim thugs show many similarities although one of them is now waiting to be executed by islamic Sharia and the other is fulfilling the original goal of islam, i.e. to rob infidels of their money and use it to impose that very same Sharia racism/sexism.
Never forget: Islamic Sharia (OIC) is the extreme opposite to Human Rights!
The Saudi monster to the left of Saif al Islam, Alwaleed bin Talal, who works hard to undermine Human Rights while supporting racist/sexist OIC/Sharia, disguises himself in a veil of "business" (flipping/wasting/OIC-Sharia-agitating with oil money) and "charity" (the old Muslim Brotherhood Sharia trick with "Western" oil and welfare money) and buys cheap points on "reforms" for Arab women (compare the muslim woman who got Nobel's peace prize for advocating in favor of letting muslim women remove their face cover - what a huge "reform" for muslim women!). Fact is that precisely because of him being part of the Saudi dictator family he is exempted from the scrutiny of the islamic Sharia police and can lead the same "Western" life in Saudi Arabia as what he is allowed to (because of "Western" Human Rights) when he is in the "West" (which is most of the time).
Why this complete silence about the Spanish court's hunt for Alwaleed bin Talal's DNA to compare it with semen found on a rape victim?!
While poll leading ant-Sharia Newt Gingrich's name has been constantly missing in Google's quick search column poll lagging pro-Sharia Rick Perry has been there all the time! Also note that Google's top news is given to the Arab League islamofascists and their effort to smear the last defender of US against islam, the worst hate crime ever!
Update: After this posting Gingrich appeared on Google again together with the usual smear (Klevius doesn't propose any connection though).
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Representatives of slamofascist murderous dictator regimes are welcomed at the Swedish Nobel dinner - islam critical elected Swedish politicians are not
* although Klevius doesn't share much of Sverigedemokraterna's political views Klevius would always vote for any party or individual who opposes islam and who supports Human Rights. Opposing islam is at least equally important as it was to oppose Nationalsocialism (Nazism) during Hitler!
Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud awarded in Sudan by war criminal "president" Omar Bashir who is arrested in his absence by the International Criminal Court in The Hague for crimes against humanity (e.g. in Darfur etc). Even Kenya has ordered arrest of this muslim scumbag who here hugs and kisses his beloved Saudi supporter the muslim Billionaire scumbag rape accused hatemonger Alwaleed bin Talal.
How bad and widespread is this evil islamophilia already?
It's really bad when a Google search on 'Saudi Aftonbladet' puts Klevius as number one. It reveals how Sweden's main news paper keeps its readers in ignorance about islam and its guardians, the Saudi dictator family and OIC!
Some people don't communicate with me anymore simply because I dare to question the support of the by far worst ideological hate crime ever against humanity and Human Rights (consider e.g. 1400 years of uninterrupted Koranic slavery and slave financed Sharia)!? What a disgusting bigotry and hypocrisy. Not at all different from the Nazi supporters during Hitler's regime. But I see it from the bright side as an effective social filtering process leaving me with those true human connections based on Universal Human Rights we all should support.
Wednesday, December 07, 2011
Swedish Aftonbladet blinks Amnesty's Saudi report while the Swedish king awards the islamofascist Saudi dictator and Sweden sells weapons to the Saudi dictator family
No Jews or Christians are allowed freedom of religion in the "homeland" of the "religion" of ALL muslims! And in islam's "hometown" Mecca no non-muslims are allowed. Moreover, everyone visiting/working the land occupied by the Saudi dictator family is stripped of all those rights Saudi's get in non-muslim countries.
This known Saudi hate-mongering dictator "king" is usually excused for whatever he has done. Why? His hands are full of blood not only from domestic, Bahrain, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria etc neighboring countries victims but also, and even more so because of all the hidden islamic hate crimes all over the world that his spreading of islamic intolerance racism and sexism has caused.
.This disgusting rape accused Wall Street terrorist tries to give islamofascist Sharia a glamorous dollar smile while 100% backing the world's most intolerant dictator family to which he himself belongs.
When Amnesty presented its verdict on the Saudi dictatorship Sweden's main news paper Aftonbladet didn't mention it at all despite they've eagerly published Amnesty reports about Syria etc.
Pic taken when other media had already reported about the Amnesty report for a day
Monday, December 05, 2011
How dumb and misled (?!) by Alwaleed & CO could a NATO top senior (S. Gass) possibly be about islamofascist Sharia and women's rights?!
The murdering and torturing islamofascist Saudi dictator family (don't let their oil wealth blind you) seems to be behind much of the distorted, misleading or suppressed "information" on islam that media people, politicians, educators etc vomit upon us on a daily basis. And two of its main scumbags are "king" Abdullah (who ordered the occupation, torture and killings in Bahrain as well as elsewhere incl. at home) of and his nephew Alwaleed bin Talal (the rape accused islamist Wall Street monster who has never made a single day of ccent work but tries to spread islamofascist Sharia by buying into media and education etc by the help of Western oil money).
Klevius comment: No, dude, it will not!Why not? Because in islam women have no real Human Rights. This is at the heart of OIC's notorious decision to abandon Universal Human Rights and replace them with islamofascist Sharia in UN (which, btw, was created to defend ALL of us against such fascisms).
Wikipedia's utter PC nonsense about women's rights in islam
Status of women under Islamic law prior to the 19th century
Islamic law grants women some legal rights they did not have under Western legal systems until the 19th and 20th centuries. Noah Feldman, a Harvard University law professor, has noted:
Status of women under Islamic law since the 19th century
At this point in history the aforementioned exploration of freedom is no longer true — that is to say that whilst it is arguable that women had more extensive legal rights under Islamic law than they did under Western legal systems in the past, it is no longer true today.
Klevius correction: Would you believe this utter nonsense! This must be written by an islamofascist imam in desperation after having realized islam's miserable historical records (i.e. the, without a doubt, single worst ideological crime ever throughout 1400 years)!
An extremely childish and self-righteous tone is set by "islamic law grants women some legal rights they did not have under Western legal systems until the 19th and 20th centuries". This is of course utter nonsense and reflects
a will to whitewash evil islamofascism by trying to smear the development that stopped slavery and created the most powerful moral thought ever, i.e. what later on became the freedom part of the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration.
This tendentious and charlatan childish babble is then repeated as "whilst it is arguable that women had more extensive legal rights under islamic law than they did under Western legal systems in the past" under the title "Status of women under islamic law since the 19th century" is extremely polemic, not to say simply childish. Moreover, the statement doesn't contain even a trace of truth. There were never such things as "Western" or "islamic" legal "systems". And before Romans erred to Christianity their women were much freer than in any islamic society much later on. And whereas "Western" women, despite an oppressing Judaic-Christian tradition, easily managed to steer everthing from nations to armies, islam has always shown its impotency when it comes to women's rights.
Btw, the fictitious Khadija (the fictitious Mohammed's first wife who, at 40+, was a wealthy widow but already out of heterosexual attraction and child-bearing age) lost much of her power when obeying Mohammed's order to convert to islam!
So whatever you do, don't support Wikimedia before you're sure it's clean from evil islam propaganda!
Sunday, December 04, 2011
Did Alwaleed bin Talal Alsaud & Co not only "elect" Mohammed Obama but also stopped US from getting its first ever black president, Herman Cain?
Should this anti-Human Rights activist and Sharia promoting Saudi oil-rich scumbag Al-waleed bin talal al-saud (or whatever) really be allowed to dictate and censor what Americans are fed via media?! Isn't his Human Rights violating racist/sexist and hate mongering islamofascist Sharia agenda far more dangerous than anything Murdoch has done?! He now competes with BBC for being the world's foremost propagator for islamofascism.
Saturday, December 03, 2011
A muslim who stumbled on the "sword of islam" and now begs for Human Rights to resque him from islamic Sharia
Naive Michael Jackson's "friendship" with Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (a member of the muslim Saudi dictator family) and islam turned disastrous when he realized he couldn't make the planned world tour that was aimed to complete his "conversion" to islam and satisfying financial and cultural expectations.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Islamists should be protected by Human Rights – but prosecuted for being muslims believing in Koran islam! This is the core of the islam problem. A muslim is per definition a hate mongering racist and sexist because of his support for islam (islam being anti-Human Rights Sharia and Sharia being adopted by the world's main muslim organization OIC).
And precisely because of islam's inborn evil one way racism/sexism (i.e. what made it "successful" in the first place but now clashes against Human Rights) OIC wants to "hid" it by simply criminalizing the very mentioning of this inevitable fact.
The extreme hypocrisy of hiding behind a mask of "peacefulness" while simultaneously supporting the violation of Human Rights must be better exposed.
Wednesday, November 09, 2011
Cambridge's islamofascist "Faculty of Divinity": We are all non-indigenous – except the African ape-man
However, the clearest evidence that universities are “hotbeds of Islamic extremism” is OIC and its Saudi and Sharia connection (OIC and the Human Rights violating 1990 Cairo Declaration are both Saudi inventions) as well as its rejection of the most basic of Human Rights. The extreme danger of OIC is that this tool of Saudi islamofascism is handled via so called "moderate muslim" politicians, professors, media people etc. These in turn are looked upon as "harmless" by ignorant and naive (or paid) non-muslim collaborators.
Saudi supporting and "schooled" Cambridge University "faith-lecturer" adds his (faith?)confused "contribution" to anthropology
Timothy John "Tim" Winter (aka Abdal Hakim Murad), is a British Sufi muslim at the "Faculty of Divinity" Cambridge University. According to him we are all non-indigenous – except the Africans. That would mean the apelike "Homo sapiens" that was around some 160,000 years ago, but who had nothing to do with modern humans (no genetic nor other evidence for such a weird, but PC, connection exists)! Or does he mean African chimps with whom we, according to existing genetic evidence, do share the same root?!
Klevius antropology tutorial for the poor ignorant and confused "muslim" Tim Winter (not that I bother about Tim's bottomless confusion about human evolution, but I do bother about him being a link in the horrifying chain of Saudi islamofascism)
further developed by Klevius. It definitely proves that what we may arguably consider as humans did not develop in Africa. What came out of Africa was a small Chimp/Homo hybrid which ought not to be confused with more human-like Homos already in existence both in Eurasia and Africa (these Homos later became mixed with the down-moving modern "Aurignacian" humans from the North).
What is noteworthy is that the beginning of the "Aurignacian" modern human happened in Central-Asia/Siberia and that the "proto-type" most probably was small and ugly (with fat women) but extremely intelligent - certainly more intelligent than Klevius and the rest of today's humans who are just a diluted version of this original modern who then conquered the world by mixing with existing stupid Homos).
Denisovan (Siberia) ape-man
Klevius aditional comment: As you well know, Tim, islam is creationist and doesn't approve of a view that humans have evolved from "animals"! This is why it was so unfortunate that Homo floresiensis was found in a muslim country (Indonesia) which led to the possible destruction of valuable genetic material as well as deformation of remains because of the senseless actions of Indonesia's chief "anthropologist" Teuku Jakob! By far the worst anthropoogical scandal since the British Piltdown man. One may contemplate whether the Piltdown scandal is a main contributor to the senseless support for unsupported or meaningless Africa centrism. A reaction of guilt that blinds true research.
Hatred against Jews at the "Faculty of Divinity" Cambridge University
In the prevailing PC eagerness to pave the way for islamofascism old Jew hatred in the form of Marcionism has been reborn. Just like the Nazi (National-socialist) German's ideas were appropriated by German's.
"New Testament Only Christians".
Marcion believed Jesus was the savior sent by God and Paul was his messenger. However, Marcion also rejected the ´Jewish Hebrew Bible and the God of Israel as a separate and lower entity (who created evil) than the all-forgiving God of the New Testament.
Ironically, the "Faculty of Divinity" at Cambridge University was created in the aftermath of Magna Carta, the first tiny step for removing dictator tyranny and for paving the way for (negative) Human Rights.
What Klevius has said about Wahhab the father of Saudi islamofascism (2010)
The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.
* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!
Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.
After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.
(analysis taken from Homo Filius Nullius by Peter Klevius).
Klevius comment: And today this evilness threatens the free world through spineless politicians and UN! The banner of Enlightenment is now upheld by heroic women, e.g. African Ayaan Hirsi Ali who has suffered as a victim of islam(ofascism) and escaped to the West, only to find that she was abandoned by those she thought would protect her! In fact, Western politicians and media are busy implementing that very Arab-islamic oppression so many muslims have escaped!
Human rights vs islamofascist "rights"
According to Koran-islam only true muslims can be considered real humans. The rest of the world hence belongs to either category two infidels "of the book" and or category three infidels (without "a book" presumably). However, there's also a fourth category which can never reach a fully human level in accordance with Koran-islam. Those are girls and women!
Sex segregation is to be understood as lack of rights because of one’s sex as referred to in the UN Declaration on Human Rights from 1948: "Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Human Rights Declaration, without distinction of sex. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty."
This conceptualization may be compared to the sex segregated "rights", in the Cairo declaration from 1990: "All men are equal in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities, without any discrimination on the grounds of sex."
The main difference between these declarations is that the former is negative, i.e. without room for interpretations and negotiation and due interventions, whereas the latter is positive, i.e. connected to “obligations and responsibilities”. Negative rights are here seen as not synonymous with natural rights, because the latter presumes the existence of certain rights, i.e. is in fact positive, whereas the former does not.
Whereas "entitled all the freedoms" is a negative right, "basic human dignity and basic obligations and basic responsibilities" are all positive rights. Through "responsibilities" negative human rights can easily be restricted & even eliminated.
Furthermore, "in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and basic responsibilities" are all tied to some imagined or real basic tenets which may include whatever tradition or belief about segregation that is at hand, i.e. the very opposite to freedom in the original UN charter. The very fact that "obligations and responsibilities" are mentioned and tied to "equal" opens up for inequality on the grounds of sex. If dignity, obligations and responsibilities are coupled to sex it inevitably means that they differ between the sexes.
So when Mary Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman the Saudi islamofascists were already busy with the opposite task, i.e. the original islam. In fact, the true nature of islam & its “Allah” is now slowly emerging in all its evil infidel racism & sexist confinement/rapetivism, easily traceable through 1400 years of heinous crimes (incl. physical genocides, hundreds of millions murdered & enslaved) against humanity, not to mention ethnic & cultural genocides - still ongoing in Sudan etc.
Don't let Arabian oil wealth obscure the true nature of their backward ideology - not because it's backward but because it's truly evil!
The stereotype of the “peaceful” muslim isn’t true. S/he isn’t necessarily peaceful but rather ignorant about her own "religion" which is in fact nothing but politics pretendin as a faith.
Btw, (for the "faith" people) you cannot ”believe”. If you "believe" that “god” or an elephant or whatever, sits under the table, you either really think so or you are perfectly aware that you (or someone) are making it up. Take my example from Demand for Resources, p 34 (1992): You think you see a stone but it later turns out to be a fake one made of papier-mâché. However, when you told your friend you saw a stone, both of you "believed" it. In effect, whatever you experience you ought to believe it until disproved. Life IS a an endless series of retrospection (see how our brains really work on EMAH)! Adding an extra "belief" on top of this is mysterious to me!
Analysis copyright KLEVUX
Educate yourself abt islam, the worst crime ever against humanity
Origin of religion
Sex segregtion/rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden
Posted by klevius at 8:45 AM 0 comments
Labels: Wahab Saud Ayaan Hirsi Ali Enlightenment Human rights Cairo declaration Wahhabism islam infidel women
Friday, November 04, 2011
How come that we continue blinking/excusing the worst of evil fascisms now represented by the Saudi Caliph & Co?!
* For you ignorant, Ottoman was a slave imperium based on Koranic teaching that miserably fell apart when slavery was forbidden!
The bleeding obvious
The evilness in islam is its incompatibility with the core idea of Human Rights, namely that every individual has the same negative rights (freedom from impositions) no matter of sex, beliefs etc. This means, for example, that whereas Human Rights let women decide by themselves, Sharia-islam denies them this right by imposing sex-connected “duties”, “responsibilities” “dignity” etc creepy euphemisms for sexism. Just like when Muslim Brotherhood started calling truthsayers about islam “islamophobes”.
In fact the whole of islam is evil. What people might consider less evil or even good doesn’t belong to islam in any meaningful sense. What made islam “successful” wasn’t any personal reflections about how to be nice towards your neighbor but just the very opposite. Islam is, and has always been, a racist/sexist parasite on the “un-islamic”. However, that hasn’t hindered islam supporters from Caliphs to journalists and poiticians etc to include islam’s booty in islam itself. It’s like calling a criminal thug a police just because he sits in a police car.
OIC (islam) against Human Rights
Klevius comment: No, not even in theory is it possible to reform islam without completely emptying it from its islamic content!
The mystery (unless you understand the deep nature of sex segregation)
Apart from Western oil money and Oriental inferiority complex boosted racism, the main lubrication for continuing islamofascism is sex segregation. The simple truth is that our cultural sex segregation is lagging far behind the equality potential offered by Human Rights. And the main culprit in prolonging it is, as already Otto Weinger pointed out more than a century ago, the "Woman". Sigmund Freud, who was one of the worst advocates for continuing cultural sex segregation, probably caused Otto Weininger's premature death (age 23) by mocking the young genius thesis. Later on Ludwig Wittgenstein hailed Weininger as one of very few intellectual heroes of him. Wittgenstein never considered Freud as a hero but rather amused himself with Freud's "intellectual" house of cards.
...says Klevius, your foremost expert on sex segregation in a time when no one else seems to be interested in the most vibrant of issues ever...