People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Muslim born & Saudi fed Mr X "president" & how the Saudis put him in the White House - & the islamization of (an already sexist) Harvard
Klevius comment: One of the most eager islamist missionaries, Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud (the guy who accused US for 9/11 & offered oil money in "compensation") who probably has functioned as a "goalkeeper" (i.e. he has probably rolled much more money than he has "earned") for washing Saudi oil money into islamofascist "charity" around the world, isn't only the main contributor to the islamization of Harvard but also connected to muslim born Barry Barack Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro's (or whatever) suspicious academic admission to Harvard (via the supremacist fascist organization Nation of islam's Khalid Mansouri - see pic at Mr X's right ear - who has been Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud's legal "advisor" in US). Moreover, this money puppet also supports so called islamic feminism, of which I've warned for more than a decade now.
Those who study Koran know that islam from scratch denied rights of girls/women precisely because their sex attraction to Mohammed & his male accomplices combined with the reproductive capabilities of girls/women (both physiologically as well as culturally when rising children under the threat of the Sharia sword & apostasy ban) made their status confined as sex slaves. And the main difference between infidel sex slaves & muslim sex slaves was that the former couldn't transit inheritance, simply because it was already robbed somehow! The extremely childish, ridiculous & backward (not to say desperate) notion that islam gave more "rights" than the tribal Arabs preceeding it is simply not true in its context! This is why "islamic law did not succeed in expunging the patriarchy of the pre-Islamic world from their practices". Islam IS sex segregation &rapetivism! This fact isn't at all altered by "muslim" pilots etc! Btw, the Saudi State Department has warned that "Women considering relocating to Saudi Arabia should be keenly aware that women and children residing in Saudi Arabia as members of a Saudi household ... are considered household property and require the permission of the Saudi male head of their household to leave the country."
In conclusion one may consider that islamofascists have succeeded in placing an illegitimate & unconstitutional stupid muslim puppet in the lead of Americans because of the same reason as they succeeded to take over Harvard. Sex segregation (remember Summers?)!
There’s hence a straight line from Mr X’s miserable* pre-Harvard university records (Mr X's Harvard constribution was miserable as well) via Mecca (Riyadh) to the White House.
* Miserable in the sense that law schools usually prefer high scores. Another point is, of course, Mr X's poor writing records. Maybe he can only read!
Thursday, April 23, 2009
The area we today call Pakistan was more than a Millennia ago slaughtered, enslaved & raped by Arabic islam (submission). This is the root of the problem with Pakistan - how to get rid of islam!
Klevius comment: Anyone curious abt the real origin of islam now has the opportunity to see it live - not only in Afghanistan/Pakistan, but around the world. And when wealthy Pakis escape from islam to the West they stubbornly repeat the Western dogma: "Islam isn't islam". Why? Because they, like the moron in the White House & other supporters of islamofascism, "respect islam" the worst crime ever against humanity! Would you believe it! Aggressive islam (i.e. political islam) creeps through the Vagina gate, AK47, TNT, & democratic institutions (which hence have ceased to be democratic). Like all fascisms islam is a one way road to hell.
According to Bill Warner (Center for the Study of Political Islam) 61 percent of the Koran talks ills of unbelievers or calls for their violent conquest and subjugation, but only 2.6 percent of it talks about the overall good of humanity.
Moorthy Muthuswamy: In fact, an appropriate and statistically acceptable characterization is that Islamic doctrines overwhelmingly preach dislike, hatred and conquest of unbelievers and that this material constitutes the majority of the content in the Koran. Using this statistical basis, one may also interpret that the token “goodness” toward unbelievers is present in the Koran in order to camouflage the true intent of subjugating and conquering them. When this anti-unbeliever-rich Islamic doctrine is preached through mainstream mosques, one could justifiably claim that neither the mosques nor the people who deliver the sermons there nor those who listen to them are likely to develop a moderate outlook toward unbelievers.
During the past sixty years from every Muslim majority region of South Asia – without exception – upon gaining power Muslims have set about marginalizing and worse – expelled most non-Muslims to the neighboring non-Muslim majority areas. This occurred despite the people sharing everything – including ethnicity, culture, language, but excluding religion. Most of these expulsions occurred before 1975, when money from Saudi Arabia was starting to flow into the region to immerse the population with even more Islam.
Statistical Islam helps us, probably for the first time, comprehensively contest misinformed notions upon which flawed Western policies vis-à-vis Islam/Muslims have been based.
Data analysis strongly discounts President Obama’s assertion given in the first interview of his presidency to the Saudi Arabian TV network, Al-Hurra: “[w]e cannot paint with a broad brush a faith [Islam] as a consequence of the violence that is done in that faith’s name.”
The analysis – subject to data and statistics – suggests that Muslim populations strongly driven by Islamic doctrines find “mutual interest and mutual respect” vis-à-vis Western civilization rather elusive. In this context, President Barak Obama’s declaration in his inauguration is really a ticket to nowhere – “[t]o the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.”
Emancipation vs submission - Negative Human Rights vs islam
Samir Amin: “Mahmood Taha of Sudan was the only Islamic intellectual who attempted to emphasize the element of emancipation in his interpretation of Islam. . . . Taha's execution was not protested by any Islamic group, ‘radical' or ‘moderate.' Nor was he defended by any of the intellectuals identifying themselves with ‘Islamic Renaissance' or even those merely willing to ‘dialogue' with such movements. It was not even reported in the Western Media.”
Klevius comment: No wonder! This is precisely why islam is submission, i.e. to oppose emancipation!
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
The worst enemy of the free world & its puppet, the muslim born* bowing moron, Mr X “president” of the United Media
MR X, FACE IT, YOU LOST ALL CREDIBILITY IN THE FREE WORLD & MOREOVER, PAINTED YOURSELF IN A CORNER WITHOUT RETURN! As long as the U.S. Constitution defends freedom of/from religion, freedom of girls/women etc. USA is at war with islam & will always be! Klevius quiz: How come that Mr X (Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro - or whatever) who was "assisted" into Harvard law school by Abdullah's legal advisor (a NOI racist) & specialized in constitutional issues, seemingly doesn't understand the basics of the basis of democracy & human rights (i.e. negative human rights)? If he did he would never be able to "respect" islam. Or is he already so convinced that he can turn the US constitution upside down by the help of his powerful islamofascist pals & the United Media?! He certainly already sidestepped the constitution when he became "president" without even proving his own identity!
* To our knowledge Obama hasn't committed open apostasy as yet. As a muslim he can't be a president (yes, there are those other reasons as well) because islam (in any logical meaning of the word) doesn't permit the freedom entitled by the U.S. constitution, e.g. freedom of/from religion. Compare this to islamofascist Saudi Arabia & its evil dictator (the most important representative/caliph of islam) he bowed for! This is why apostasy (leaving islam) is considered the worst crime against islam**. On the other hand, if he did leave islam at some point (after being in Pakistan as a 20 year old & changing his name from Barry to Arabic Barack?!) he violates the most central tenet in islam which fact also proves that a true muslim can never be in accordance with the US constitution or Negative Human Rights!
** Why don't you get it MR X? Didn't you read history or were the books already changed in favor of islam?! The "faith" you "respect" is based on enslavement, the number of victims by far exceeds any other ideology on the planet, it's totalitarian, & once in (via birth) you are stuck. Add to this all the other one-way tricks of islam, e.g. sexist abuse of women as sex slaves & ideological reproducers under the threat of Sharia & apostasy ban, a muslim man can marry whoever & the kids become muslims while a muslim woman can only marry muslims etc etc. The basic formula of islam consists of everything opposite to the idea of freedom of the individual as described in the US constitution & the UN Declaration of 1948!
The Saudi "king", the "islamic world's caliph", is the main representative of islamic hate mongering all over the world through mosques, schools, universities etc. He is also behind the Cairo declaration of islamic "human rights" (which is the very opposite to the original Human Rights Declaration of 1948), which denies girls & women freedom (to make this evil islamic declaration look more positive it's embedded in a retorics of "accepting cultural traditions". This is also the guy behind OIC's (57 islamofascist countries who have hijacked UN's Human Rights Council) UN resolution to criminalize criticism of islam. Nothing of this info can be found on Wikipedia which instead praises this man's "philanthropy". Apart from the fact that it's easy to be philanthropic when you sit on a mountain of money given to you without you doing anything, the Saudis are famous for "islamic philanthropy", i.e. to use donations for the purpose of spreading islamofascism (compare, for example, Klevius post on how the Saudi house acted in the Tsunami catastrophe!). And, as described elsewhere on this blog, the "House of Saud" was founded on plantation slavery outside Riyadh & the whole of the country was stolen by the help of a few jihadists. But Mr X Obama (or whatever) is by no means Abdullah's only friend. "Obama" has to share him with e.g. Sudan's Omar al-Bashir (indicted by the International Criminal Court for what has been described as the Darfur genocide).
Rakesh Maria (Mumbai): “My boys have ferreted out the real conspiracy behind the attack. The danger we have exposed is not only to India, but to the whole world. The sooner the world realizes that, the better.”
Klevius comment: And the sooner the world realizes that it's islam per se, the better. Contrary to the proposed picture of islam prevalent in mainstream media, islam is not less but more related to crimes/terrorism than generally thought. This is because most islamic atrocities are under reported no matter how intensely the committed crimes/terror acts are linked to islam. And as you know, islam is an evil political ideology outlined for the purpose of offering moral comfort for what otherwise would be classified as pure evilness. A robber's moral.
Get rid of your cowardice fear & dangerous ignorance:
Origin of islamWhat is rapetivism?
Origin of religion
Saturday, April 11, 2009
A DUMB INSULT TO THE FREE WORLD! Mr X "president's" bow for evil islam & its most intolerant* representative, muslims' World Caliph, "explained"!
The White House denies that the "president" bowed!?
Klevius comment: Together with his friend Sudan's Omar al-Bashir (indicted by the International Criminal Court for Darfur genocide) Saudi "king" Abdullah is an annual figure on The World’s 10 Worst Dictators list. But Abdullah is even worse
because of his hypocritical use of "inter-faith" rhetoric while spending oil money for the purpose of islamic hate mongering all over the world through mosques, schools, university courses etc etc. He is also behind the Cairo declaration which denies girls & women freedom (see e.g. previous posts). This is also the guy behind OIC's (57 islamofascist countries who have hijacked UN's Human Rights Council) UN resolution to criminalize criticism of islam! In short, this is the true islamofascist that the disastrous new US "president" Mr X bows so deep in front of so he almost hit his head on the floor, while his White House gang tries to offer one pathetic excuse after the other!
And btw, islam IS Abdullah & Saudi intolerance & hate mongering! It's its very nature (see Origin of Vikings & Origin of islam).
Dumb kids & their supporters who really are so utterly stupid so they believe paparazzis are worse than islam (& a surprising amount of grown ups) fueled by Abdullah & idolizing an other dumbhead, illegitimate & unconstitutional Mr X Obama (or whatever - see postings below).
No, I'm not insulting you US voters who were cheated by media! I'm insulting you who knew that he stands for a racist approach similar to his other friends in the black supremacist league Nation of Islam, yet still voted for him! And you who have been brainwashed feel such a confused guilt for something you don't have anything to do with but was, in fact, caused by islam. Compare your own stupidity to the imam who said muslims have more right to Australia than non-Aborigine Australians because "we came by our own free will"!
Klevius comment: Isn't it amazing that those people who are the most fixated with "inherited sin" also happens to be completely blind for islam's 1400 years of historical & contemporary sin, notwithstanding it's written in blood all over?!
Shinto meets islam
The moron with the stolen high tech Japanese video camera on the pic above may be compared to the stupid & non technical islamofascist oil billionaires drooling over Honda's super high tech robot Asimo. As you may already know (especially if you have read Klevius history lessons) islam has, from start, showed an amazing (but logical - islam is parasitism) technological impotency.
Klevius islam lesson: islam in perspective
Wheras West (founded on Negative Human Rights) lacks racism & sexism (in fact, actively prohibits & criminalizes such tendencies - except in the case of islam itself of some funny reason), islam is BUILT on precisely these two disgusting remnants from the past!
Monday, April 06, 2009
Muslim born "president" X bows for Saudi islamofascist (but not for the Queen) & wants to islamize US/EU while abandoning female victims of islam
HOW COME THAT CRITICISM OF THE WORLD'S MOST RACIST (& sexist) POLITICALLY FASCIST IDEOLOGY (which very slavery soul rests on infidel racism & Sharia rapetivism embedded in a totalitarian veil of apostasy ban) IS NOW CALLED "RACIST"?!
The illegitimate Mr X "president" has decided that not only should islamofascist terrorist supporters such as Saudi supported Ingrid Mattson & CAIR (see pic below) help islamize US but also that Turkey should reinvent Ottomanism led by islamofascists, & do the same with EU. And at the same time this confused (or deliberate) Mr X tells us his 70,000 troops new war in Afghanistan is for the sole purpose of protecting US, not Afghan girls & women! That's why he OKs islamic marital Sharia rape.
Can you tell who is a moderate muslim eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who recently stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from the muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations - these guys are right now busy accusing FBI for offending muslims because FBI has monitored a California mosque that hosts islamic terrorists planning blow up jobs in California). Btw, the British lord Ahmed (who threatened Britain with 10000 street jihadists if Wilders was allowed entrance to Britain) to the right is also accused of murder & causing death (this dangerous islamofascist recently got away with only 3 months in jail because the biased British court "thought" he had just stopped his 20 minute constant SMS session while driving, just seconds before he killed a person!? Btw, Mr X "president's" first call was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the Nation of Islam guy at his right ear while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!
Look at the Ottoman Turkish couple (Erdogan & his Sharia submissive wife)! This is islamofascist sex apartheid in person, representing islamofascist Sharia rapetivism in general.
Islam is anti democratic & anti human rights from the first page of Koran to the last jihadist
Voting for a person who supports islam isn’t democracy but its very opposite, simply because islam IN ALL FORMS (that makes it meaningful to call it islam) is the anti thesis of democracy! To understand the depth of this statement you may have to visit Klevius definition of Negative Human Rights, the foundation of democracy). This is also why 56 islampofascist countries have adopted an "islamic human rights declaration" which, in fact, is a deeply sexist Sharia rapetivism.
Islam is a set of norms and ideals that emphasizes the inequality of girls/women.
Islam is rooted in slavery and rapetivism and glorifies these usually among civilized people as evil perceived customs.
Mr Xs scandalous & shameful anti constitutional "presidency"
John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution: "She basically is asking, 'By what authority' is Obama president," he told WND. "In other words, 'I want you to tell me by what authority. I don't really think you should hold the office.' It's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents, he does not want the public to know. What else could be the reason for his hiring law firms across the nation to fight any request for information as basic as his Occidental College records from the early 1980s."
Jerome Corsi: "The main reason doubts persist regarding Obama's birth certificate is this question: If an original Hawaii-doctor-generated and Hawaii-hospital-released Obama birth certificate exists, why wouldn't the senator and his campaign simply order the document released and end the controversy? That Obama has not ordered Hawaii officials to release the document leaves doubts as to whether an authentic Hawaii birth certificate exists for Obama."
Obama officials repeatedly have declined comment, relenting only one time to call such allegations "garbage."
Bowing, deeply, for islamofascism
Wesley Pruden: "He bowed deeply to the Saudi king in London, so deep that he risked banging his head on the floor, a real presidential first. When he got to Ankara on Monday, he stopped just short of converting to Islam, probably raising the hopes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who told Americans last month that if only they would adopt Islam, they wouldn't any longer have to fear beheading knives raised in the name of Allah and peace."
Frank J. Gaffney Jr (update 7 April 2009): The video (the flogging of an Afgan girl who refused to submit to islamic Sharia "marriage" with a muslim Taliban leader) is inconvenient as it provides a vivid insight into the repressive, totalitarian and misogynistic nature of Shariah at the very moment that President Obama has been aggressively promoting the idea that the Islamic world must be "respected." To do so, he insists that non-Muslim Americans must use "respectful language" with regard to Islam and its followers. He went beyond words to demonstrate his submission to the King of Saudi Arabia by deeply bowing before him (something he did not do for the queen of England). The trouble is that any criticism of Shariah and of those - including the Taliban - who practice it as authoritative Islam dictates is not simply seen as disrespectful. It amounts to blasphemy, a capital offense under Islamic law. Among those promoting the application of Shariah blasphemy laws worldwide are: the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), a kind of international mafia enterprise made up of 57 Muslim-majority countries around the world; the so-called Alliance of Civilizations, which met in Turkey during Mr. Obama's visit there; and the United Nations Human Rights Council and General Assembly, which are - like the alliance - increasingly dominated by the OIC. Non-Muslims' obligation to "respect" Islam is also high on the agenda of the seditious Muslim Brotherhood and scores of groups in the United States that operate as fronts for it. (Worryingly, some of the latter claim the Obama administration has expressed a desire to pursue the hiring of 45 Muslim Americans the brotherhood types have vetted for the purpose).
Turkey's islamofascist leadership is anti democratic & anti secular. Simply voting for anti democracy doesn't fulfill the criterion for democracy!
Erdoğan: "Moderate Islam is a term open for discussion. There is no need to place a new term before or after Islam. Klevius comment: I 100% agree.
Malaysia's former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad:"There is nothing extreme about Islam if we follow its teachings as contained in the Quran." Klevius comment: There's nothing extreme in totalitarianism, except totalitarianism itself, of course.
Erdogan: Islam means peace. Therefore, Islam refuses all radicalism. Klevius comment: But also do note that islam has this in common with all totalitarian movements! It simply means that non-islamic is synonymous with "radicalism". Morover, islam means submission, not peace!
Howard, former PM in Australia: "By moderate Islam I actually mean real Islam."
Did I mention that Mr X "president" is an islamosocialist just like late Saddam Hussein. In the socialist camp he is also then in bad company with such historical profiles as Hitler:
Adolf Hitler, May 1st, 1927: "We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."
Klevius comment: This is the basic failure of Marxism/communism/socialism (see Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor, & Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship). However, unlike islam they didn't have sex slavery at the top of their agenda.
Illegitimate & unconstitutional Mr X "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) in the Turkish parliament: “We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country.” Klevius comment: Assuming he didn't refer to all the African slaves islam gathered & sold, or to 9/11, what is left is Mr X's own extremely racist & sexist black supremacist organization Nation of Islam. You know, those guys who murdered Malcolm X & spat on Martion Luther King!