Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

The hotline closed since 1400 years - leaving muslims on their own

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Monday, January 16, 2012

The Vagina, the Penis and a confused 10th circuit court ruling AGAINST the 1st amendment

Why are there no Jews left in the Arab world - or are there?






A populist but disastrous, hateful, racist and sexist Judaic ideology called islam threatens Human Rights

Judaism (a late "branch" of Zoroastrianism) has from its beginning prospered on parasitism (slaves, rapetivism, i.e. sex slavery, interest etc)  and  has for some Millenia now cursed the world in different manifestations - the latest being islam. The Jews started by slaughtering Canaanites. Why? Because their God told them to do so. The very same God who later told them to fight the longest civil war against each other. And just like muslims now use to persecute and slaughter Jews, some of them also persecute "wrong muslims" like Shia etc. The old Abrahamic heritage is alive and well - but a disaster for Human Rights!



Joseph Goebbels: “Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.” “Whoever can conquer the street will one day conquer the state, for every form of power politics and any dictatorship-run state has its roots in the street.” “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

Saif al-Islam, an other islamofascist we used to see flashing around before encountering his own Sharia


Alwaleed bin Talal, rape accused member of the Saudi dictator family

is eagerly spreading racist/sexist Sharia jihadism with a modern touch (media, Twitter, Disney, universities etc).


Turkish islamist PM Erdoğan engaged in politics by joining the National Turkish Student Union, an anti-communist action group. In 1974 he directed and played the lead role in Goebbel’s play Maskomya, which presented Freemasonry, Communism and Judaism as evil. In 1976, he became the head of Beyoğlu youth branch of the islamist National Salvation Party (MSP).

Erdogan: "There's no moderate islam"!


The fascist finger points at YOU!

I always used to wonder how decent looking people turned into fascists or accomplices to fascism, e.g. in Germany during the rule of National-socialism. But now with islam (the worst hate crime ideology known to history) with Saudi oil money not only taking over UN, our supposed bulwark against fascism, but also criminalizing criticism/research about islam, it all starts to make sense. Moreover, this is then presented in the form of two senseless oxymorons. Whereas the former is called “Islamic human rights” (i.e. Sharia), the latter is labeled “islamophobia”, which word then implies “racism” against muslims. And although most people understand it they also understand the social stigmatization it carries with it in a repressive climate of political correctness etc. So for  example, already Heinrich Himmler targeted “those who offended the national feelings of citizens”. Back then those hurt citizens were Germans, today they are muslims belonging to the Saudi/OIC caliphate/Umma nation.


The evil appeal of “monotheisms” in general and islam in particular

No one in her/his right mind could possibly believe in ”monotheism”. So from where do they all come?
The answer is simple, from racism and sexism/sex segregation. If you want to be racist or sexist or perhaps even both, what could be more appealing than a legally sanctioned  ideology that transfers your racism/sexism to a “god” who then turns it into “righteousness”.


Judaism, the world’s sole “monotheism” and its Vagina/Penis branches

Judaism (a late ”branch” of Zoroastrianism) has in different manifestations cursed the world for some Millennia. The racist “chosen people” and sexist rapetivism , (i.e. female sex duties) approach. A crucial moment was when a particular branch of Judaism introduced the Penis as the sole custodian of one way (apostasy ban) “muslimhood”. This caused an explosion of “muslims”, although this development was paralleled with an even bigger explosion of abused slaves and parasitism in a variety of forms. But the real corner stone of all Judaic tradition, sex apartheid, has reached its peak in islam. 


Muslims murdering mostly muslims but also many others

A brief scan over main news reveals a strong and consistent pattern of muslims attacking muslims. However, this has a long tradnition i Judaic "monotheisms" but really got momentum when Judaic slave traders more extensively started populating surrounding civilizations after the conquest of Alexander the Great, hence also giving birth to what used to be called Hellenic Jews who then came to constitute the ideological body for major "civil wars" between Jews.And from there it has continued to an extent that there are no "Jews" left in the heartland of islam.

Muhammad, according to muslim sources (Andrew G. Bostom 2006):     ..waited for some act of aggression on the part of the Jews of Khaybar, whose fertile lands and villages he had destined for his followers...to furnish an excuse for an attack. But, no such opportunity offering, he resolved in the autumn of this year [i.e., 628], on a sudden and unprovoked invasion of their territory.

Ali (later, the fourth 'Rightly Guided Caliph', and especially revered by Shi'ite Muslims) asked Muhammad why the Jews of Khaybar were being attacked, since they were peaceful farmers, tending their oasis, and was told by Muhammad he must compel them to submit to Islamic Law. The renowned early 20th century scholar of Islam, David Margoliouth, observed aptly:

    Now the fact that a community was idolatrous, or Jewish, or anything but Mohammedan, warranted a murderous attack upon it.

Moreover, this canonical hadith (from Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4324), which further incorporates a Koranic verse (K 59:5), states clearly that Muhammad also sanctioned the destruction of the trees (i.e., date palms) of infidel foes:

    It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) ordered the date—palms of Banu Nadir to be burnt and cut. These palms were at Buwaira. Qutaibah and Ibn Rumh in their versions of the tradition have added: So Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, revealed the verse (K59:5): 'Whatever palm—tree you cut down or leave standing upon its roots, It is by Allah's command, and that He may abase the transgressors'

[Shaikh Burhanuddin Ali of Marghinan]—in the Traditions...the Prophet plundered and despoiled the tribe of al—Mustaliq by surprise, and he also agreed with Asamah to make a predatory attack upon Qubna at an early hour, and to set it on fire, and such attacks are not preceded by a call...If the infidels, upon receiving the call [to Islam], neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them, because God is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do. And having so done, the Muslims must then with God's assistance attack the infidels with all manner of warlike engines (as the Prophet did by the people of Ta'if), and must also set fire to their habitations (in the same manner as the Prophet fired Baweera), and must inundate them with water and tear up their plantations and tread down their grain because by these means they will become weakened, and their resolution will fail and their force be broken; these means are, therefore, all sanctified by the law.


Klevius advice to  “monotheists”: “Monotheisms” are not only semantic weirdos but often also directly ideologically and/or physically dangerous. So you have to abandon every “monotheism” asap if you want to adhere to Universal Human Rights.

Thinking about a “universal islam”? Well, stop thinking! Parasitism can’t stand alone!


Klevius correction of the 10th Circuit Court's insane, not to say childish, decision

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals' take on a democratic Sharia ban by more than 70% of the voters: "The only religious law mentioned in the amendment is Sharia law, which is defined in SQ 755 in religious terms: “Sharia Law is Islamic law. It is based on two principal sources, the Koran and the teachings of Mohammed.” Aplt. App. Vol. 1 at 179.

Klevius comment and correction:  The very fact that "Sharia Law is Islamic law" makes it a non-religious law even if it happened to contain as "religious" considered stuff, precisely because, according to the main muslim world organization OIC (initiated by and headquartered in the most religiously intolerant dictatorship in the world, Saudi Arabia), all legislation ought to be in accordance with (i.e. not violate) islamic Sharia (as outlined in the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights" in islam). As a consequence OIC (i.e. mainly the Saudi dictatorship aided by some islamofascist Turks) has abandoned those very Human Rights that the US together with other nations have ratified as a bullwark against totalitarian laws. 


As Jacoby writes, “Adams and Jefferson could look back with satisfaction on what they both considered their greatest achievement—their role in establishing a secular government whose legislators would never be required, or permitted, to rule on the legality of theological views.





 Do you know this man?

This unbelievable and anti-constitutional "president" chosen not democratically but by a Goebbelian like media propaganda playing on "racism" etc dirty cards now has more than a Billion dollars ready for vote trapping.

This is the muslim born apostate (?!) MR X "president" who for some decades eagerly listened to a black hate preaching supremacist who awarded racist supremacist Farrakhan (Nation of Islam). This "president" also says he "respects" islam despite the sad and embarrassing fact that islam doesn't allow him to stop being a muslim (no matter if an apostate is punished here or in the "afterlife" this is considered the gravest of crimes in islam)!

Talking about awards, the creepy islamofascists who award a muslim wife murderer on the pic to the left also happens to be the representatives of the islamofascist organization (CAIR) behind the law suit opposing the democratic Sharia ban mentioned above.



















.
.
.

No comments: