A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
A glimpse of an awkward tendency in the US: Tip of the black Islamic "brotherhood" (sic - where are the sisters?) racism/sexism iceberg? (Also compare Klevius' notion on Hip Hop vulgo "rapetivism").
Also read abt Islamic crypto-creationism and how an Indonesian "scientist" stole and damaged recently discovered Homo floresiensis
Klevius comment: It's a tragic irony that many black Americans now support that very same Islam that was enforced upon them before their Arabic/Islamic masters traded them overseas. The Arabic word for black and slave is actually the same, i.e. "Abed".
The ideology of Islam, not the people, is the problem, just as it was with fascism in the World War 2.
Muslims, married to a failed past, offer little hope for integration into modern society Klevius correction: By abandoning their ties to evil sexist and racist Islam every possibility for integration, cooperation, (or whatever appropriate naming you might prefer), is open to them exactly as it is for non-Muslims!
"Standing on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, on the afternoon of September 11, 2001 the residents of the neighborhood danced in the streets, laughing, shouting to each other, shaking hands. These people were not what one would suppose to be fanatical or militant Muslims. They were people who had come to these shores from the Middle East, mostly shop keepers, bakers, purveyors of eastern spices, tradesmen, cab drivers and the usual diversity of people found in a New York"
The "holy" Koran states:
Kill the disbelievers wherever we find them. (2:191)
Fight and slay the pagans (translation: that's us) seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem. (9:5)
Slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers...(5:34)
...strike off the heads of the disbelievers...[make a] wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives [for ransom] (947:4)
[treatment of disbelievers]...garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowels and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods (22:19).
The Koran also instructs Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and the feet of the unbelievers (5:34), fight unbelievers until no other religion except Islam remains. (3:85)
Klevius comment: But the real Achilles' heal of Islam (apart from its totalitarian/fascist "infidel" message) is its inevitable sex segregation. Unfortunately many in the West still seem to live in a "fin de siècle" sex segregation hysteria (see From Freud to bin Laden), hence naively applauding Sharia and other Islamic stupidities (see From Klevius' without love), while the victims, in Sudan/Darfur and elsewhere, suffer!
And always remember the difference between true racist/sexist Pan-Arabic Islam/fascism on one hand, and ethnicity that has been (most often forcefully) labeled "Muslim", on the other. Be proud of your ethnicity - not of Islam!
The real political heroine Ayan Hirsi Ali: "We Must Declare War on Islamist Propaganda"
When Ayan Hirsi Ali was about to visit Stockholm recently, Swedish official state (Islamist?) radio eagerly reported the name of her hotel and how the polices were positioned! But I haven't heard anything since abt what she said when she arrived!? Suddenly no media interest in Sweden at all... As many times before noted on this blog Swedish state media continue their horryfying tradition exactly as during the fascist era of the 1930s and WW2.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Thursday, August 18, 2005
US racial segregation persecuted and detained 120.000 innocent Shinto-Japanese while now welcoming, and even boosting Islam!?
Oil-fueled (by Pan-Arabic oil-billionaires) racist/sexist totalitarian and fascist Islamo-black Hip Hop culture (also see Shinto high tech vs Hip Hop vulgo) isn't perhaps that cool after all if you know anything about its background! And how much do these fascists harm other blacks and their inter-race/sex relations? Black US Islamists! Why do you try to steal the colors of your non-Muslim brothers and sisters?! For a deeply informed and focused (albeit extremely brief - you have to look up the details for yourself, but avoid the biased "answers" from the (pbuh)-people!) background on the evil roots and fascist (i.e. denial of equality to "infidels") heritage of Pan-Arabic Islam (incl. today's so called "moderate"/"liberal" Islam), see previous posting below! Not only Muslim Brotherhood, Galloway's Respect/Socialist Workers Party and Hitler's Socialist Workers Party all have the same political, leftist and totalitarian/fascist roots in common! Islam in every form (via Koran) belongs to this unfortunate, but for detached and asocial individuals (and cold-hearted politicians), apparently so appealing evil tradition. So let's look at the history from another, Shinto angle of view! Islam has always been technologically impotent, an economic eunuck, but eager to reproduce, even through pure rapetivism. This has never been economically beneficial for Islamic states without natural resources that non-Muslim "Infidels" can dig up for them. So why not now establish a Nation of Shinto. Although I’m not a Japanese I could be its first member – you don't have to be an Arab to join Nation of Islam, do you?!
Persecution of Shintoists in US
"...the Japanese American Experience outlines the largest violation of individual's rights by the United States government of the 20th century. It details the World War II experiences of 120,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry who were forced to leave their homes and businesses on the West Coast and Hawaii, and live in desolate camps located in seven states west of the Mississippi River. Japanese American community leaders were taken into custody without charge and without trial; some were even held on Ellis Island. Ultimately, the FBI concluded that there were no acts of sabotage or disloyalty by Japanese Americans."
Why do we talk so much about, and encourage fascist/racist/sexist Islam (we don't use to encourage Satanism although it's also popular among weird youth etc) and so little about Shinto (perhaps one of the oldest religions ever, probably rooted beyond the Jomon culture some 13.000 years ago - see Definition of religion and Out of Africa as "Pygmies" and back as global "Mongoloids")?
And why do we talk so much about "Negroids/blacks" and so little about "Mongoloids"?
Racial discrimination against Japanese before Pearl Harbour
"Like the Chinese, the Japanese had been welcomed at first as a source of cheap labor, but shortly thereafter, became targets of anti-Asian campaigns, maligned as the "yellow peril." They inherited much of the new prejudice directed previously against the Chinese, especially as the Japanese moved from itinerant farm laborers to become owners of farms and small businesses. Discriminatory laws passed during the early l900s denied the Japanese the right to become citizens, to own land, and to marry outside of their race. In addition, they could not buy homes in certain areas and were barred from jobs in certain industries. Some could only send their children to segregated schools, and in 1924, immigration from Japan was halted altogether."
The Japanese were registered and given numbered tags. Many who were given as little as 48 hours notice to sell their possessions and to dispose of their property. Losses incurred during this time were estimated in the billions of dollars.
Klevius comment: Hawai became the first US state without an ethnic majority. The Japanese constitute the largest group and the racial tensions are almost extinct. But what about e.g. the racist African town project in Detroit, or consider a sexist/racist/totalitarian Arab/Islamic Sharia state in the US?!
Youth's involvement in racial tension, sexism, and totalitarian Islam is, of course, a by-product of detached relations to their families (see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship). It has almost become a (false) rule that teenagers should abandon their families and let their peers foster them. This development has been enforced by the modern "social state" populated mainly with women (see What is sex segregation?) who now "take care" (without real relations) of other people's children/youth.
I really want to deal with the world and its people without getting disturbed by racism and sexism in any form. Don't blame me for my skin color or my lack of tits, or my possession of a penis etc! I have Japanese and black friends but I have only encountered racial hostility from blacks*. That's very sad because I'd really love to approach blacks as Japanese, or whatever other people for that matter. And I don't have a need to feel more "valued" than others. Just equal! And I have no problem with musicians who are better than I, writers who are better than I, sporting performers who are better than I, better looking people, or anthropologists who are better than - well, I'm working hard on that one...
Also see: US Black Bimbos & Rambos in the service of Arab/Islam while black Africans suffer under it!
Klevius' holy (negative) human rights
Shinto/Japanese oil-saving high tech vs. oil-fueled Islamic/Arabic Koran schools
"...blacks resent what is seen as Hispanics leapfrogging them up the socioeconomic ladder...
...many Hispanics say they are treated in racist ways by blacks.
Many Hispanics say they are being targeted for robbery by blacks who pick on undocumented workers, a group far less likely to report crimes to police
* Once when I visited a bank in San Francisco I was kind and polite towards the black lady behind the desk (some people may tell you they think I'm pretty social) in a way that could have made any black person in Europe smiling and positive. But not in the otherwise friendly San Francisco. Although my errand there took abt an hour she hardly even smiled but instead repeatedly warned me not to accidentally touch an item that was placed so close to where I had to sit that it was almost inevitable. The tension from her side (even before any touch) was best described as forced (almost) correctness. A couple of month later I was placing my Safeway card on the desk in front of the cashier after having placed my groceries there. The female, elderly black cashier was very hostile and blunt when she ordered me to pick it up and place it in her hand! I had never seen her before and I had never been treated in that way before in SF. Do I have to mention that I didn't behave in any way unpolitely before? Quite the contrary, and I certainly didn't expect her reaction. In fact her behavior made me connect to the clerk and other observations, which I now seem to share with many others. She certainly didn't know I was a temporary visitor. At another time I was waiting for the Muni and noticed the hostile look of some black teenage girls when they checked out some white girls I knew weren't known by them before. But I also encountered friendly blacks, mainly elderly males or young blacks, mainly from outside the US! One of the nicest, a young female student, I encountered on a bus trip. We had a long and nice conversation and I had almost forgotten the clerk in the bank, so I asked her how long she had lived in SF. She was from Africa on a temporary visit! Another friendly black, elderly male entered Muni, perhaps slightly affected by some liquid substance. He looked around, smiling, and asked: "Is there any seat for the mentally impaired?" I was occupying a side seat with a baby in my lap so I said: "Thanks, but I already got one!" He looked at me and my baby for a while, then smiled even more and gave us a hug! Of course he wasn't the only black from SF to be kind against me, though. But it felt a little bit weird to pay special attention when black people happened to be kind.
Friends in California have told me about growing black racism, sometimes open but mostly more subtle. Black officials and police officers who e.g. uses "bureaucratic" harrassment against non-blacks (and what abt Oakland polices shooting two Koreans, and other similar cases?!), unflexible and rigid black bus- and Muni drivers etc. I've also noticed that black gang youth in SF seem to have to express a more loud and intruding profile than those from Asian, Latino or other backgrounds. I remember a car full of screaming black young males, outside the Jesuit church, equipped with a boosted car stereo on full volume. I especially noticed the even louder refrain in the "tune": FUCK, FUCK, FUCK! (also see Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden) and San Francisco gang rape culture.
The double tragedy of Cindy Sheehan - is she now serving the evil ideology that killed her son?!
But there is one person who has never had any doubt that Bush is right, and therefore has moved heaven and earth to try to prevent democracy from getting an Iraqi foothold: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the head of al Qaeda in Iraq!
Klevius' sum up and suggestion: The more resistance against Bush, the worse for the girls/women suffering under Islam and the more support for Islamic evilness rooted in Medieval Mideast tribal robbery and fight for power. Japan, on the other hand, is the only surviving tribal society that is also high tech (Japanese art, litterature and music have been copied by Europeans and others from their first encounters) and extremely wealthy as a result of, not natural resources, but their own historical skills. Why not now balance evil contraproductive Islam with a Shinto Sisterhood or maybe Nation of Shinto (i.e. ancestor warship - compare the Vagina gate in the atom of kinship - spiced with a renewal of what de-sex segregated pre-Samuraj Shinto in many ways possessed, compare e.g. all the empresses before 600 A.D.) with exactly as big a mouth as Muslim Brotherhood, Nation of Islam and other senseless al-Qaeda supporters?
And remember, Japan's militaristic expansion was a direct result of Europe's and US' pressure to open up Japan for Western traders in the late 19th century! And the Shinto camel (Lexus) is now the world's best quality product!