People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Monday, November 30, 2009
As the corner stone of the islamic "faith" hence is a legalized sex segregation it is also in stark opposition to the 1948 Human Rights Declaration & the European Convention, which both defend girls'/women's right not to have their freedom limited because of their sex. The OIC's Cairo (Sharia) declaration clearly states (via Sharia) that females are exempted from certain rights because of their sex related "duties" & "responsibilities" (btw, most of the Sharia law concerns restrictions put on girls/women).
While Millions of muslims throw stones on the infidel "Satan" (you, the Westerner - incl Westernized "muslims") on their "pilgrimage"* to the most intolerant nation in the world, Saudi Arabia, Klevius again offers a history lesson for those deeply misled & ignorant abt islam:
* The islamic hate mongering "pilgrimage" tradition was originally a slave trade journey to the Meccan slave market. Compare Africa's mualim "hero" Mansa Musa who, on a single pilgrimage, brought tens of thousands of African slaves to Mecca.
Minarets have had two main functions throughout history, neither of them which is the calling to "prayer" (islam is essentially abt jihad politics & submission, not abt a personal faith - personal faiths are seldom totalitarian, are they):
1) As a watch tower (this they got from the Romans). Koran doesn't stipulate neither minarets nor mosques, hence lacking any directives for such constructions. There's reason to believe that the first minaret ever was used in Basra (more than 30 yrs after the alleged death of Mohammed - no one knows anything for sure abt this Mohammed who isn't even officially referred to at this time) as a watch tower over Zanj plantation slaves imported from East Africa. In fact, Koran was compiled as a moral defense for a Sharia finance based on slavery parasitism.
2) As a tool for the warning, humiliation & intimidation of infidels, i.e. not a phobia but a very real threat (i.e. islam's most central tenets: infidel racism-Sharia sexism-apostasy ban). Because minarets were used to indicate the presence of islam they initially existed only in predominantly non-Muslim cities. There were no minarets at the alleged "mosque" of Mohammed in Medina nor at the original mosque in Mecca.
Muslims & islam supporters behaving exactly like nazis & nazi collaborators in 1938!
Stephen H. Norwood, professor of history at the University of Oklahoma, is author of "The Third Reich in the Ivory Tower: Complicity and Conflict on American Campuses":
Last week's last-minute cancellation at Princeton and Columbia Universities of a lecture by Arab feminist Nonie Darwish - an author who has strongly denounced Islamic intolerance and jihadism - brings to mind American universities' unwillingness to protect campus free speech rights for opponents of Nazism during the 1930s. Princeton's reason for shutting down the scheduled presentation by Darwish strikingly resembles those given by Queens College's president in April 1938 when he withdrew an invitation to anti-Nazi German Jewish exile Ernst Toller to speak on campus. The parallels between Darwish and Toller are powerful. Both were made pariahs in their homelands and came to the United States seeking freedom. Darwish, who grew up in Gaza and in Egypt, became a staunch critic of radical Islam. She wrote a book titled "Now They Call Me Infidel." Toller called his autobiography, published in the United States in 1934, "I Was a German." The Nazis burned his books and confiscated almost all of his property.
In both cases, these challenges to authority made the speakers too "controversial" to appear on some campuses here. In Darwish's case, after the Princeton invitation was issued and accepted, a campus Muslim student group protested - and the sponsoring student organizations then withdrew their invitation. This was met with the university administration's approval - or at least its silence. The university apparently would rather not have the headache of having to worry about bad headlines. Toller's case followed a similar pattern. In April 1938, after Germany's Jews had suffered years of savage street beatings, expulsion from the professions and university faculties, Toller was to speak at Queens College. The college's president, Paul Klapper, suddenly cancelled the renowned playwright's lecture, citing opposition from faculty members and students. Klapper claimed that Toller was an "ardent propagandist." Translation: His opposition to Nazism was too pronounced.
Klevius comment: Just like Geert Wilders, right!
Avoid desiformation & cure your bottomless & truly frightening ignorance abt islam! Read abt the perverse Origin of islam
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money, no matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad aginst Shia muslims in Yemen). This Saudi Arabia also wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever (it's a worrisome fact that few people seem to understand that islam's deeply immoral & extremely evil slave finance, mass murdering, genocides, imperialism, colonialism, sex slavery & Sharia confinement of females etc constitute the very soul of islam, from Mohammed to now*)! Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for girls/women.
Islam is against the law in two ways: 1) It's got its own "law" Sharia, 2) It opposes all the main tenets that constitute a democracy based on Negative Human Rights(see Origin of islam). This is why a true muslim never can honestly participate in a democratic election or as a democratic representative of democracy! Islam doesn't count "infidels" as humans!
Yes' I know, most "muslims" aren't muslims. So why do they support true islam & true muslims?!
When true islam meets democracy
The muslim victims were in a convoy of vehicles Monday heading to register a candidate to challenge even more muslim islamic Ampatuan in next year's election for governor.
What's happening in the Philippines is an example of what happens when you give islam a finger! Since Arabic islam first started to enslave poor Philippinos (many centuries before any European was around) an evil parasitic islamic slave hierarchy developed. This together with islam's jihad pillar has to be acknowledge before assessing the situation in the Philippinos. The US was very wrong when it didn't completely stop islamic slavery there some 100 yrs ago but instead (wrongly) believed it was better to leave it as it was. They saw some uneducated poor slaves whom they thought would be "better off" where they were!
Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "It will be difficult for authorities to enter Ampatuan territory, let alone arrest a member of the family. Most of the elected politicians are Ampatuans, the police are their people, it's very difficult to get in without having more violence if they do not cooperate".
Klevius comment: Really! I.e. an islamic state & part of the Saudi Caliph's (Mr X "president's" dearest friend) world Umma.
Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "With such kind of an alliance between islamic politicians (she actually wrongly said "warlords") and the national elected government officials, it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms, how they could actually do electoral reforms at the local level since they have a bond of gratitude to these local leaders (she now uses the term "local leaders" instead of "warlords" - presumably the next step would be "local politicians").
Klevius comment: She's right, "it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms" if democracy involves islam! Isn't it simply the other way round, i.e. that islam abuses democracy for reforming democracy to suit islam, i.e. anti-democracy!
Every finger given to islam inevitably leads to its main body. This simple rule explains what should have been totally unexplainable just a decade ago, namely that a European country such as UK now has Islamic Sharia courts! You "muslims" who are on the run from islam, don't go to Britain if you want to avoid Sharia!
The only cure against islam is to get rid of it. Start by facing every muslim you meet with these essential questions abt "infidels", sexist legal segregation etc etc etc etc etc etc!!!!!!
Peter Wagner: "Basically, when Mohamed or Allah have said something contradictory, and there are lots of those, the last command takes precedence over the earlier command and renders the earlier command null and void. Since the books of the Koran are not in chronological order one needs to know which command came last. Much of the "kill the infidel" stuff is the more recent commands.
"Part of the problem with "peaceful Muslims" is that none will repudiate the "kill the infidels" commands of their god and prophet because to do so would make one worse than an infidel with another command by Allah to put the apostate to death. In fact, "Radical Islamists" are nothing more than true believers doing exactly what Mohammed and Allah are telling them to do. The "peaceful Muslims" are actually the unbelievers and the Jihadists are the true believers. Check the 'murtadd'; it also explains why "peaceful Muslims" won't condemn the Jihad at Fort Hood. If you want personal proof, when talking to a Muslim, ask them to condemn and repudiate the grossly hateful and kill-the-infidel stuff in the Koran. You will get some interesting answers."
Whereas true Christians "turn the other cheek, love their enemies, do unto others..." etc. True Muslims kill the infidels. Both are just doing what their god and prophet told them to do.
* yes, all forms of monotheisms(sic) are evil & part of an immoral sex segregation(early Christianity may be seen as an anti-sexual exception, before it was overpowerd by patriarchal sexism). However, as explained in Origin of islam, islam is the latest & most advanced/evil form of this evilness (what made it successful was Mohammed's sex & booty attraction on teenage boys!). Islam took the worst parts of old Judaism & fine tuned it via laws that STILL IN 2009 makes it impossible for a true muslim woman to love a non-muslim whereas a muslim man can fuck whomever & the child can be claimed a muslim (compare Mr X "president"). I never cease to get surprised when I meet decent people who still don't know this simple fact! They seem to daydream that islam can't be that bad, can it? YES' IT CAN!!!
Monday, November 23, 2009
Mr X "president's" beloved Saudi-islamic hate mongerer strikes again: some 60 murdered in islamic terror on the Philippines while PC media is silent!
This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money. No matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad).
This is what media should have written if they really wanted to inform those ignorant/misled abt islam (they certainly possessed the info but didn't want you to know!):
Some 50 people ambushed, murdered, decapitated & thrown into mass graves by islamic murderers resting on what is written in the Koran, & sponsored & agitated by that very same Saudi Arabia that is the "guardian of islam" & which is now busy killing Shia muslims in Yemen! Also, this Saudi Arabia wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever. Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for women.
Islamic Abu Sayyaf (in Arabic 'bearer of the muslim sword') in the Philippines has become noted for its ambushes of government forces, kidnappings, piracy, & the beheading of captives. The U.S. Department of Treasury in 2007 named three of their Saudi supporters: Abdul Rahim Al-Talhi, Muhammad Abdallah Salih Sughayr and Fahd Muhammad Abd Al-Aziz Al-Khashiban. According to Levey, no one identified by the US or UN as a terrorist financier has been prosecuted by the Saudi authorities.
Klevius history lesson: First of all, start by curing your bottomless ignorance abt islam (e.g. Origin of islam). Islam was in its beginning as well as now a parasitic slavery ideology capable of producing nothing except suffering & more muslims in a system of institutionalized rapetivism (Sharia).
Whatever islamic historical stone you turn around you always gonna see decay masked in a slave or oil finance.
SE Asia was islamized in exactly the same way as was Africa, namely via slave rading/trading. An Arabic network of slave rading/trading was established by the help of local chiefs while selling/using the poor in slavery. In the process the wealthy ones became even more wealyhy & powerful while they adopted islam. Also due to inter-marriage & islam's inborn dead end Sharia structure (which means every pregnancy led to more muslims or muslim slaves while none the other way round according to islamic law). Whereas both Christian & islamic praxis may have widely varied in different times & settings, islam only has an unaltered moral basis that stands firm on a moral resting on infidel racism/Sharia rapetivism/apostasy ban! Against this background it's equally pathetique & tragical that, on the one hand, these young muslim terrorists deeply aware of islam's teachings, think they're (like Pol Pot's etc willing young murderers) murdering for a good heavenly cause, &, on the other hand, those youngsters who are misinformed to believe islam is "a religion of peace" & "egalitarianism" (your only real key out of this dilemma is by understanding Negative Human Rights. And when it comes to "egalitarianism" you may remember that life is per definition not egalitarian, only death is egalitarian. This is also the main shortcoming of monotheist "godisms" (see Klevius definition of religion) However, a global system based on the elimination of taxation of work, & instead progressive taxation on luxury or "bad" consumption, combined with positive human rights such as basic education, health care etc).
It's because of islam's parasitism you can't buy any decent product made in Saudi Arabia!
What many a young jihadist doesn't seem to understand is islam's inherent evilness in the form of its infidel racism & sexist treatment of women as sex slaves. Or maybe they are...
However, they do behave like Pol Pot, don't they. And why should they be more educated than the Western morons who supported Khmer Rouge?
Btw, there was no "golden age" of islam in Spain, only a disgusting islamic slave finance. Also, there was no good (like BBC use to present it) islamic Ottoman rule. On the contrary the Ottomanian slave "empire" inevitably deteriorated until the abolishment of slavery & Western force together with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secularization paved the way for the Turkish progress that is now again on the verge of slipping into even more islamic barbary. Let's see if the new EU president remembers what he said abt islamic Turkey as not a possible part of Europe.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
THE REAL MASTERMIND OF 9/11 & HIS PUPPET MR X "PRESIDENT"
You can see Mr X "president's" close islamic advisors at his ears. In the middle you have CAiR (Council of American islamic Relations, founded by bin Laden's close friend & ally) rewarding Hasan (founder of the "moderate" "inter-faith" islamic Bridget TV, supposed to deliver a better - i.e. false - picture of islam in the US) who then, in a purely Koranic/islamic style, decapitated his divorcing wife after having stabbed her some nine times.
Klevius Law School, extracted from Demand for Resources (1992:43-44): The only strictly scientific discipline, jurisprudence (narrowly defined), is characterized by an absolute truth, i.e. the intention of the legislator expressed (& blurred) in text form. A reality (or a game, if you like) that’s construed by the participants/players themselves. A possible violation is spotted by ticking off on a list of crimes (the law) in a test bench we call the judicial process. This is an experiment in which a ”case” is evaluated against the text in the law, which also regulates the judicial process itself. However, if it’s difficult or impossible to evaluate an alleged crime, this may be due to incomplete data or clumsiness in the process. Moreover, it’s also possible that complete/good enough evaluation cannot be reached due to special characteristics of a particular case. If this is the case then the defendant is acquitted (no matter how clear it is he did the deed) & may even be entitled to compensation for a “false allegation” (& maybe even a green card). A failed prosecution only needs to be judicially “false”, not false in the realm outside the judicial process. A court can never disprove an accusation , only fail to judicially prove it. An "appropriate decorum" wouldn't change this basic fact, but rather contribute to a picture of the US Justitia shooting herself in the foot.
A peculiar first consequence of the above is that the defendant has an absolute right to a fair trial, which includes the right to be treated as not guilty (although suspect) until the verdict. Intervening in this right of the suspect/defendant by someone involved in the judicial process may constitute a violation of the said process.
Mr X “president’s” babbling abt the 9/11 case may well constitute a tampering with the jurisdiction of the courts for the purpose of influencing a decision, thus violating judicial independence. A civilian trial for the 9/11 terrorists may harm the US (& world) security, place government officials and civilians at risk, and provide an islamic propaganda platform not unlike 9/11 itself. Remember how the islamic murdering of some 3000 people became used as a “liberation” flag for islam supporters!
Attorney General Eric Holder isn’t directly elected by the American people but indirectly by the illegitimate Mr X “president”, whose schizopheric decision to hold military tribunals for other detainees at the Guantanamo Bay prison, including Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri (who planned the 2000 USS Cole bombing) while exempting the Islamic terrorists of 9/11, reflects the urge to de-militarize (& hence to make political) the war on islamic terror. Btw, what's the difference of bombing Cole or Pentagon?
Some examples of Mr X "president" & his Attorney General's babbling
Attorney General Eric Holder: "The defendants could have been tried in either military or civilian court, because the 9/11 attacks were both an act of war and a violation of our federal criminal law. But at the end of the day, it was clear to me that the venue in which we are most likely to obtain justice for the American people is in federal court."
"Failure is not an option (Klevius comment: Well, it is! It's the very foundation of Western justice just as falsification is the basis for Western science). These are cases that have to be won. I don't expect that we will have a contrary result."
According to Mr X "president" himself those offended by the legal privileges given to Mohammed by virtue of getting a civilian trial rather than a military tribunal won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him".
He then partly realized his own stupidity & quickly added that he did not mean to prejudging the outcome of the trial. "I'm not going to be in that courtroom. That's the job of the prosecutors, the judge and the jury."
Klevius comment: The main difference between military & civil cases is that the former threaten the nation (even if it's just a trifling matter of discipline) whereas the latter only try to "order" a society's relations with its individuals. A failure to do so doesn't necessarily threaten the society which can adapt (man made legislation) because it's not equally limited to a specified purpose.
Monday, November 16, 2009
BBC & other overpaid "executives'" IQ deficiency, islam's racist/sexist Caliph (& his puppet), the Angels of Antichrist & Klevius' islamophobic harem
Gal Luft: The murdering of 13 U.S. soldiers in Fort Hood by Nidal Malik Hasan is one in a string of events involving muslim soldiers and veterans. According to General Norman Schwarzkopf’s aide, Rick Francona, Saudi officers appeared to have been directed by their senior military or religious leadership (i.e. Abdullah & Co, i.e. Mr X "president's" first call - Klevius comment) to spot and assess potential converts to islam among American military members. Once targeted, Saudi military officers, incl. an imam, would attempt to meet the American outside of the work area. These approaches included generous gifts & literature abt islam. Americans who decided to convert to Islam were rewarded by an all expenses paid trips to Mecca, & payments as high as $30,000. The commander of Saudi forces in the Gulf, Prince Khaled bin Sultan, bragged in his memoir that more than 2,000 American troops converted to islam through this campaign. “These muslim troops are now the messengers of islam in the U.S. forces” said Dr. Abu Ameena Bilal Phillips, a Jamaican-born convert to islam, who worked under the auspices of the U.S. Air Force while converting U.S. troops to Islam. After the war, Phillips moved to the United States to “set up Islamic chapters in the U.S. Defense Department.”
Note: ‘Evil’ is here conceptualized as something that a majority of people would normally consider evil (if released from a confusing/blurring & anti human rights ‘faith’ propaganda).
Islam’s evil original formula: An evil racist "infidel" moral that opens up for slave rading/trading/trafficking & the subjugation of girls/women under the sex terror (rapetivism) of Sharia in the dead end of apostasy ban.
The overpaid (usually paid by taxpayer's - 50 of BBC's executives earn more than the PM!) "executives" behind political correctness (PC)
"White" children, forcibly shipped to Australia, whose children now are the target for often brutal PC racism (tooling islam), is just but one example revealing the dangerous, unethical & deeply immoral racist segregation of people based on their skin nuances. The whole PC movement (which, as a byproduct, unfortunately bolsters evil islam) rests on the false allegation/self guilt (you name it) that white people have statistically been more technologically/economically successful (because industrial technology happened to start in Europe) & that this has something to do with colonialism (this view is not only rudely unfair against less fortunate "white" - and "black" - individuals/people but also excepts all wealthy "black" Europeans. In fact, there’s really nothing to prove that European colonialism, on the whole, didn’t benefit those people, sometimes even hugely, compared to islam’s purely parasitic imperialism/colonialism based on slavery in its three main modes: sex slavery/household slavery, plantation slavery, & "soldier"/jihadist slavery. It was islam's blood-sucking that delayed Africa's & other's progress.
In this context it’s also important to note the extreme intellectual desperation/fraud hiding in efforts to prove islamic slavery more "benign" than others. Slavery has always “leaked” between the classes just like in the society as a whole. Only in the case of islam it's popular to pick the cherries. When the overwhelming amount of islam's historical & contemporary atrocities becomes non-escapable the only refuge is to make evil good, isn't it!
Those "white" overpaid "executives" (in media & politics) are today's ruling class, i.e. belong to that very same strata they use to spit on historically (often incl. the "bourgeoisie"). And precisely because their hypocrisy is so obvious they desperately have to defend themselves by pretending not to be racist although they are almost as racist & sexist as those islamists they support. In this process they even boost their own racism & simultaneously commit a double sin against those in a weaker position in society!
Angels of Antichrist, Homo Filius Nullius & sex segregation
In possibly the most important sociological paper in the 20th century, it is argued that the socialist individualisation/collectivisation (the social state) of humans has resulted in a dehumanization that is best visible in the state's (often horrible) praxis with children. The "BBC executives & Co" mafia belongs to this unfortunate outcome of Enlightenment. These are also the guys who now (again) betray us with a fascism that is more deceptive than ever.
Klevius comment: When I was a young boy I used to read Holocaust documentaries mainly because I couldn't for my life understand how Germans, who looked & behaved exactly like people around me, could have committed such atrocities. What really scared me was that no one gave me the slightest clue to having solved the problem of the popularity of fascism. It was only after 9/11 & the emerging PC movement I really started understanding how the social mechanisms behind fascism work & what motivates them.
Of course, nothing will change before the true adaptation of Negative Human Rights as they were initially intended. Such a move would legally wipe out fascism & islam in one strike! And of course, we'd face new problems. However, what counts is what we're facing now.
And no, there's no risk for more persecution of muslims than there's for muslim persecution of non-muslims. Quite the contrary. Propaganda news exaggerate whatever happens to "vulnerable muslim minorities" while covering up muslim atrocities, racism, sexism etc against the invisible group of non-muslims, although we're talking abt a one Billion plus islamic majority Umma/O.I.C., & although the real minorities are the non-muslim & muslim individuals who suffer under this fascist elephant in the porcelain shop.
The older part of tendentious & hugely overpaid (are they even doing anything or are they contra productive?) the notorious "BBC executives" belong to the generation that sexually exploited vulnerable girls under the false mantra of "sexual liberation for women". Remember, that back then the position of girl's was even more vulnerable than today. They were just released from their homes while still carrying the old sexual moral heavily on their shoulders. And when they heard/saw the boy bands playing on Cavern they screemed out their sex segregation while the boys were rewarded by sex (some 50 bands or so used to play in one night).
This "sexual liberation" had happened before, in the Victorian/Edwardian era. However, when we look at what happened in Japan a century ago we'll find that the slogan was quite the opposite namely "freedom from sex" (no, Klevius isn't proposing any certain attitude abt sex, only to get rid of rapetivism, i.e. institutionalized or individual sexual pressure & due sex segregation, self rape, rape etc)!
One may summarize the overpaid smuggish "executive" Beatles generation (& many of their kids) as going from free sex to the hermetically closed islamic burqa (Sharia) & its unfree content which is excluded from whatever sex or love except for the duty to satisfy her husband whenever he feels for it!
The medieval islamic conquerers brought no women with them, only their swords.
Today the same is repeated. Most are young muslim men who are supposed to take non-muslim wives, whereas muslim immigrant women (except for Ayaan Hirsi Ali & Co) are tied with/to islam via Sharia & aren't allowed to fall in love with non-muslims.
Yes, most islamic slavery through 1400 yrs have been "peaceful", i.e. just kidnapping or cheaply buying slaves from criminal locals.
When women & children of Mali suffer even starvation on top of everything else because of islam (i.e. no food but a huge over production of kids while the muslim men are loitering around thanks to UK welfare) it's almost parodical when BBC, the knight of islam, cries abt it, isn't it.
Islam is always one way - the dead end!
Cure your ignorance:
Origin of islam
The islamic origin of Vikings
Friday, November 13, 2009
To understand the pics see Origin of islam
Also consider The Jewish/islamic Origin of the Vikings
A modern Arab woman on Arab men - a wormhole to the islamic myth abt pre-islamic Arabia
Hajar Benlahmar (slightly edited by Klevius): If i have to choose between marrying an Arab and non Arab, I'd pick the non Arab even though I’m an Arab, for one simple reason, I can't bear the mentality of Arabic men, which is dogmatic, racist, sexist - just name it (Klevius: Islam?). An Arabic man cant accept a woman as partner in life, he wants her to be under his control (Klevius: Sharia?) following his wills and denying her existence. Most Arabic men are not looking for a wife to share life with, but they are looking for a domestic servant.
Klevius comment: "A domestic servant" whose services include sex & the reproduction of dogmatic, racist, sexist boys & submissive girls.
You've heard it many times. The evil pre-islamic society was improved by Mohammed & islam. However, the opposite holds true. Because of a scandalous ignorance abt pre-islamic Arabia, sanctioned by islam (includes ibn-Khaldun & others), islamic vulgo caricatures of the pre-islamic Arabs are taken as facts by stupid "islamologs" & others even today.
The non-islamic world is at war with islam
Islam has, from scratch, been an attacking jihadist "faith", & if you are under attack & defend yourself it's called war, isn't it! Most of islam's basic tenets are opposite those of U.S. & the free democratic world. In fact, there's an enourmous & desperate effort to "reformulate"/"reinterpret" islam/Koran while simultaneously belittling the products of Enlightenment (which, btw, was caused by an attacking islam). Islam started & built its tenets as a parasitic slave finance combined with sex slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia & apostasy ban & sealed with monotheism. That's why sex jihadism made it initially so successful, that's why O.I.C. (Organization of Islamic Countries) have their own "human rights" (Cairo declaration, which denies girls/women freedom under the cover of "responsibilities & "dignity" etc) & now wants to (via UN) criminalize criticism of islam.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Rick Santorum: Three muslim students at Harvard University, one man and two women, who wore Western-style clothes and spoke English with little or no accent, disputed my description of Islam as it's practiced in the Middle East, maintaining that al-Qaeda's version of islam in no way reflects the islam that is practiced around the world. So I asked: Should apostates - muslims who convert to another religion - be subject to execution?
One of the women quickly said no. She insisted that she was free to leave islam if she wanted to, and that she knew other people who had done so without a problem - in the United States.
I said: What if they lived in a muslim-majority country?
Silence. Eventually, the young man blurted out, "That's different because in Muslim countries, islam and the government are one, and converting from islam is the equivalent of treason against the government, punishable by death." The two women agreed.
Klevius comment: This is why muslims can't participate in democracy without abandoning islam! This is also why muslim born (without committing open apostasy as yet - in islam you can pretend to be a Christian for the sake of islam) Mr X "president" is unconstitutional, as are all truly muslim politicians.
Again, if you don't understand the mechanism behind islam's initial success 1400 yrs ago, you end up in exactly these situations. Without knowing exactly these persons the statistical scenario is that the women represented ignorance while the man represented the evilness of Mohammed/islam.
When women share this evilness it's usually due to family, marriage etc. Of course you know that in islam women are forced to sexually satisfy muslim men while forbidden from having relations with non-muslim men. However, muslim men can have sex with both muslim & non-muslim women, four wives & an unlimited amount of concubines. Moreover, the kids are always his & muslim from birth, & it's the women's duty to foster them to obeying muslims who despise non-muslims (what Klevius call muslim racism) under the threat of Sharia/apostasy ban.
Btw, why is it that so many ask if apostasy is punishable by death? The question ought to be: Is apostasy punishable (legally or socially)? I guess this is one of a variety of islamic tactics to keep as much as possible of evil original islam alive. Islam is built on sex & threats. Sex for men & threats for women & other infidels!
To really understand the perversity of not only islam but also our own submission to its evilness, read how Jewish slave trade evolved into islamic totalitarianism in Origin of Vikings.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Remember, islam isn’t a faith but a totalitarian parasitic & occupying ideology using politics, violence & rapetivism (syn. islamofascism)! Islam's terror formula is an evil jihad* "moral" based on infidel racism/slavery/rapetivism/apostasy ban.
* remember that totalitarian ideologies are, per definition, always "threatened" & hence need to fight the "unbelievers"!
The self proclaimed islam/Koran interpretor, the fanatic & heavily disturbed islamic lunatic muslim (he was a muslim, right?) named Nidal Malik Hasan, was at least on the right track when he stated that "Obama & the US army are fighting muslims".
But according to New York Times (& other media morons), they are not fighting muslims but non-muslims, i.e. those who have "misinterpreted" the Koran.
However, according to Klevius, the US army isn't fighting muslims nor non-muslims but islam.
Wondering over Klevius lack of capitals in islam & muslim? Well, I don't use it in communism & communist, or murder & murderer either (yes I used to do it & haven't bothered to change everywhere)!
DOROTHY RABINOWITZ on political islam correctness etc: What is hard to ignore, now, is the growing derangement on all matters involving terrorism and Muslim sensitivities. Its chief symptoms: a palpitating fear of discomfiting facts and a willingness to discard those facts and embrace the richest possible variety of ludicrous theories as to the motives behind an act of Islamic terrorism. All this we have seen before but never in such naked form. The days following the Fort Hood rampage have told us more than we want to know, perhaps, about the depth and reach of this epidemic.
One of the first outbreaks of these fevers, the night of the shootings, featured television's star psychologist, Dr. Phil, who was outraged when fellow panelist and former JAG officer Tom Kenniff observed that he had been listening to a lot of psychobabble and evasions about Maj. Hasan's motives.
A shocked Dr. Phil, appalled that the guest had publicly mentioned Maj. Hasan's Islamic identity, went on to present what was, in essence, the case for Maj. Hasan as victim. Victim of deployment, of the Army, of the stresses of a new kind of terrible war unlike any other we have known. Unlike, can he have meant, the kind endured by those lucky Americans who fought and died at Iwo Jima, say, or the Ardennes?
Officials determined that "the communications were benign and contained no threat".
Malik Nidal Hasan came under scrutiny by officials beginning last year for communicating with Anwar al-Awlaki, who had been a scholar at a mosque Hasan attended when he lived in Virginia. The Virginia mosque where al-Awlaki taught had also been visited by 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour.
Officials briefed on the case said that an individual overseas was being monitored when authorities recognized that Hasan had contacted the scholar. The FBI notified two of the bureau's Joint Terrorism Task Force offices, which pursued the leads on Hasan. "We don't have any indication that he was directed, we don't have any indication that there were co-conspirators but, once again, this is fairly early on in what may be a complex and long-term investigation,"
Klevius comment: You did have indication that "he was directed"! He was clearly directed by Koran/islam fueled by Mr X "president's" beloved Saudi Abdullah & Co.
There's no way islam can accept Negative Human Rights (the fundament on which the US Constitution & the free world stands). This is why you can't be a true muslim in USA! Either you skip islam or you skip being an American! Says Klevius who is a true American!
Cure your ignorance abt islam:
Origin of islam
The Jewish/islamic origin of the Vikings
Klevius is (so far) your only in-depth guide on sex-segregation as the key to understanding medieval rapetivism in the 21th century (see e.g. Klevius definition of feminism!
Sunday, November 08, 2009
"President" Omar Hassan al-Bashir (Sudan) is behind the Darfur genocide, & a good friend of the Saudi Caliph "king" Abdullah, the culprit behind the OIC efforts to criminalize scrutiny & criticism against islam, & the main thug behind the funding of global islamic jihad, who has a muslim born Indonesian "Christ-believing"** puppet called Mr X or Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever), who is responsible for a continuing mass murder of muslims & others in Afganistan & Pakistan, mainly through drone terror, & who is busy transforming USA into an islamic Sharia land in accordance with the wish of his close ally CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations).
** Mr X "president" says he believes in a "redemptive resurrection" which is a code word for a muslim view on Jesus!
The key to Mohammed's & islam's initial (& by conventional historians unexplained) success is extremely simple (see Origin of islam) & clearly written in the Koran: A racist infidel moral paving the way for a parasitic social system of slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia law (all reproduction goes to islam & nothing to the opposite direction) & sealed by apostasy ban! Due to islam's totalitarian nature & due internal inconsistencies everything goes, e.g. real muslims vs not so real muslims etc (btw, if we were all muslims most of the men would be without wives & children).
BTW, Mr X "president's" belowed Sunni Saudi Abdullah is right now, together with Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorists, busy fighting a heavy war against fellow Yemeni shia muslim liberators (yes, you got it right)!
Saudi "king" Abdullah's close friend arrested in his absence by the International Criminal Court, but welcomed by Turkey!
Omar Hassan al-Bashir, president of Sudan, against whom the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued an arrest warrant, has been invited to a meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Istanbul. Last year, al-Bashir visited Turkey twice and "despite national and international protests the Turkish government seems to have no intention at all of changing its policy on allowing a person into the country that is under strong suspicion of being responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity".
The Darfur genocide by Sudan's National Islamic Front regime IS led by “president” Omar Hassan al-Bashir & physically performed by his extremely violent Arab/islamic para-military terrorists.
The Darfur genocide started virtually unnoticed in February 2003, under the shadow of the war in Iraq, murdering some 350,000-400,000 & with an unknown number of rape victims etc & Millions of refugees. The victims are non-Arab Furs, Massaleits, Zaghawas, Tunjurs, Birgids, Dajos etc. The pathetic notion that the victims "are also muslims" doesn't at all recognize the deep history of Arab/islamic slave racism in Africa & the cultural genocide that this "muslimhood" reflects!
Mr X "president" has repeatedly & frenetically babbled abt his "respect" for islam. Klevius question to you: Do you respect islam?
According to "muslim sensitive" US officials, this bloodthirsty Arabic islamic jihad inspired muslim terrorist mass murderer monster "acted out under a welter of emotional, ideological and religious pressures"! Klevius comment: What should I say? Poor man?! No, I'd rather say poor victims who happened to encounter this otherwise perfectly normal* but islam distorted "psychiatrist"!
* i.e. not suffering from a biological nerve dysfunction! Islam, like other brainwashing sects, is not biologoical! Nor is islam's main pillar sex segregation/rapetivism!
Btw, as those who have studied on KLEVUX already know, psychology/psychiatry (except for the understanding of psychic drugs) are hoax "sciences", mainly funded by tax payers!
Klevius Psychosocial timeline
Origin of islam
And Mr X "president" (see previous postings to understand the X & the quotation marks - no, Klevius isn't even close to a racist, just read his writings against race & sex segregation, will you, stupid!) talks & covers up in the trails of his beloved Saudi mad men.
BTW, GOOGLE OR SOMEONE HAS APPARENTLY STARTED FILTERING/BLOCKING MY PAGES LATELY. I'M FLATTERED! AS A READER OF KLEVUX YOU SHOULD ALSO FEEL FLATTERED AS STILL BELONGING TO A FREE WORLD BASED ON NEGATIVE HUMAN RIGHTS!
Friday, November 06, 2009
US islamic terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan & muslim born Mr X "president" both respect islam & its racist/ sexist Koranic jihad message!
islamic terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan was "educated" (brainwashed) in a Saudi Wahhabi mosque funded by Saudi Abdullah & Co (the very man Mr X "president" first made a call to after becoming "president" & to whom he deeply bowed at a G20 meeting)!
What a coincidence! Although, according to PC media/politicians, it's islamophobia that is the real culprit, & islam has nothing to do with a muslim man (who prays at the mosque every day) who, while shouting Allahu Akbar, mass murders US troops at Forth Hood/Texas on their way to fight muslims in islamic land, everything seems to fit at least equally well, perhaps even more, to what is written in the islamic Koran!?
To understand the home grown US (non'radical according to an imam at the US mosque he visited every day, & where he was enrolled on an islamic list for getting women) muslim jihadist terrorist mass-murderer Nidal Malik Hasan, who deliberately shot more than 40 people, you need to understand the Origin of islam!
Nidal Malik Hasan swore an oath to the US army but didn't want to obey when his ccommander in chief ordered him to the front in Afganistan killing islamic jihadists!
And why should he? His commander in chief (who isn't even a commander in chief legally - see postings below) says he respects islam, & Koran islam gives Nidal the full right to disobey everyone else except Islam anyway!
UPDATE: IS IT NIDAL MALIK HASSAN WHO IS THE REAL HERO IN FORT HOOD?! The islamic mass murderer's family & PC media now inform us that it wasn't islam's or the mass murderer's fault. It was the 40 plus victims' fault (just like 9/11) because someone had called poor Hassan a "camel jockey".
Oh my god, calling a muslim names! That might be even harder than what Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, Mohammed & other creepy mass murderers had to suffer. However, isn't the army the place no one can get through without being insulted?!
The main suspect is islam, i.e. the very same islam that has caused years of monstruous islamic jihad terror in Iraq & Afganistan in the aftermath of the one week liberation of Iraq.
Islam is a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder caused by Mohammed!
Without Naziphobia we shouldn't have had any World War 2, should we!
How long will it take for peolpe (muslims & non-muslims) to really understand the inevitable truth that you can't be a true muslim in a free democracy. Or, in other words, islam is no longer islam in any meaningful sense if you can.
Also read Klevius explosive Origin of Vikings!
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Politically correct Swedish PM Reinfeldt: "Only barbarism is genuinely Swedish. All further development has come from abroad"
Young Swedes seems equally confused as Mr Reinfeldt.
According to Novus Opinion 70% of Swedes think islamic al-Qaida did the 9/11 whereas 7% didn't. However, among under 30 yr old adult Swedes only 58% thought islamic al-Qaida did it & 15% thought they didn't. Moreover, to the question whether they thought Bush & his government were involved in the attacks 8% of the Swedes in the survey said yes while 64% said no. But again, when checking for those Swedish adults under the age of 30, only half of them dismissed the conspiracy theories whereas 18% were convinced that Bush & Co somehow did it! Moreover, an additional 31% thought maybe or were unsure!