Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Muslim born US Mr X “president” wants to protect the worst crime ever from criticism & “negative stereotyping”!
Mr X "president" (Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro - or whatever) is a born muslim & later an adopted muslim who has hidden all records of his past & who says he respects islam, the worst crime ever against humanity! His dearest friend is "the guardian of islam", the extremely* intolerant & totalitarian "king" Abdullah, for whom he deeply bows, & who has for long been top rated on the lists of the world’s most intolerant dictators! The guys from CAIR on the pic reward the muslim CEO of the “moderate” American muslim Bridges TV, who, btw, stabbed his divorcing wife 9 times before he decapitated her in a truly islamic manner.
Btw, have you noticed (what Karzai & others have experienced) that most of Mr X's islam politics can be predicted in terms of Shia (Iran) & Sunni (Saudi/Arabic).
The worst crime ever against humanity is now to be protected from scrutinity, criticism or any negative "stereotyping" by the help of Mr X "president" & his islamist pals in 57 islamic countries!
Although there’s no doubt whatsoever that islam is the ideology that throughout 1400 yrs of slavery/genocides has caused the most human suffering (Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Rwanda etc. aren’t even close), those who desperately (or out of pure ignorance) try to whitewash islam now use the last resort to avoid confronting the unbearable truth. On Oct 1, 2009, Mr X “president” & Co together with OIC (Saudi led organization of 56 islamic countries), introduced an anti-free speech draft resolution, titled "Freedom of Opinion and Expression" to the UN's Human Rights Council. It includes condemnation of "negative stereotyping of islam".
The proposed resolution attempts to construe this protection of a totalitarian racist/sexist “faith” fascism we use to call islam, as an international human rights law and obligation. I.e. in direct opposition to the Negative Human Rights that constituted the backbone ot the UN 1948 Declaration on Human Rights which was construed to hinder such totalitarian fascism from ever showing up again!
Already now everyone defending Negative Human Rights & critical of islam (the worst crime known to historians) is met with avoidance, intimidation etc hence constituting a new paria caste in the politically correct islamic landscape. When we eventually came to a point where we got rid of the evil religion-state connection by swapping it for secular human rights, every effort is made by our politicians to pave the way for an even worse & anti-humanfollow-up.
Why do you call yourself a muslim?!
Being a muslim makes you undemocratic if you by that mean you adhere to islam & its infidel racism & Sharia sexism. Islam wants to replace freedom & to confine you if you are a girl/woman in its monosexism. You can't leave your evil "faith" & you can't really, as a woman, even love someone who doesn't share this evil "faith", if you want to be considered a muslim! So either you ought to leave islam (i.e. committing apostasy, its worst crime & its deepest evilness) or you leave your right to participate in the democratic process. Third option being that you cheat as sanctioned by Koran (or are you in fact, that dumb & ignorant so you didn't get it as yet?!)!
Also remember that to say islam is egalitarian is a double lie. Infidels (& lousy muslims) are always excluded. Moreover, islam is from scratch construed for the slave's submission to his/her master, i.e. someone above you. Allah is completely eliminated in islam & replaced by the Koran which is not only full of evil sayings but also considered the last unaltered word of Allah, i.e cannot be changed. So which particular islamic evilness will hit you depends on the reader!
But one thing is extremely clear. If you want to commit evil deeds you'll find it in the Koran & you will be protected by human rights & political blindness.
It's indeed a shame if we have to wait for muslims to protect them & us from the evil of original islam, inn't it?!
Klevius is the only** one (so far) who dares to offer an intelligent & informed analysis of islam based on its main pillar sex segregation. Moreover, to make Klevius IQ really open for scrutinity there are hundreds of challenging texts on the web signed klevius. So even if you think you lack the brain muscles (or knowledge) as Klevius has, you have all the time in the world to check him out, don't you!
** Yes, there are eminent islam critics out there, such as e.g. Ayaan Hirsi Ali & others, but they either lack the truly male perspective or what it's like growing up as a free outcast in a free society while cursed with extremely high IQ & level of knowledge. Yet still never ceasing to strive for being "extremely normal"... (see Klevius Definition of religion). You may also benefit from Angels of Antichrist (no, Klevius is NOT a monogodist). Moral in a changing world cannot be stapled in a book but has to be continuously scrutinized outside religion & inside a global logic that ultimately rests on Negative HUman Rights. So when the feeble minded (or extremely treacherous) archbishop Rowan Williams sponsors Sharia in England he does it while muslim nations & individuals try to get rid of it out of pure fear for it!
DEFEND MULTI-CULTURALISM AGAINST ISLAMIC MONO-CULTURALISM!
Although there’s no doubt whatsoever that islam is the ideology that throughout1400 yrs of slavery/genocides has caused the most human suffering & genocides (Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Rwanda etc. aren’t even close), those who desperately (or out of pure ignorance) try to whitewash islam now use the last resort to avoid confronting the truth. On Oct 1, 2009, Mr X “president” & Co together with OIC (Saudi led organization of 56 islamic countries), introduced an anti-free speech draft resolution, titled "Freedom of Opinion and Expression" to the UN's Human Rights Council.
It includes condemnation of "negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups". It further attempts to construe this as an international human rights law and obligation
The proposed resolution attempts to construe this protection of a totalitarian racist/sexist “faith” fascism as an international human rights law and obligation.
Already now everyone defending negative human rights & critical of islam (the worst crime known to historians) is met with avoidance, hence constituting a new paria caste in the politically correct.
There’s no “egalitarian spirit of Islam”. On the contrary the whole original idea of islam is the very opposite, i.e. infidel racism & sexist rapetivism limitations of women’s freedom.
Btw, being a muslim makes you undemocratic. Islam wants to replace freedom & to confine you in institutionalized sex segregation if you are a girl/woman. You can't leave your evil "faith" & you can't even love someone who doesn't share this evil "faith"! So either you ought to leave islam (i.e. committing apostasy (its worst crime & its deepest evilness) or you leave your right to participate in the democratic process. Third option being that you cheat as sanctioned by Koran (or are you in fact, that dumb & ignorant so you didn't get it as yet?!)!
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
And prove me wrong, but this is the worst of terrorists with his (& his pals) fingers deeply involved in the Taliban movement as well as radical islamist elements in Pakistan, Philippines & abt everywhere where there's a Saudi funded/supported school, mosque , university etc! The evil islamist hate mongerer & hypocrite Saudi "king" Abdullah (& Co) who, on the one hand admits that "islam cannot compete with science/technology", but on the other hand, wants to benefit from islam's inborn evilness. As a criminologist I understand that unreported & in police reports unconnected islamic hate crimes (boosted by Koran verses etc deliberately distributed by Saudi oil Billionaires) may be hard to see as an entity but when you do the numbers get huge, not the least because these crimes are also largely blinked, hence paving the way for further intimidation/submission. And now the old evil chap wants to wash (with Western oil money) his reputation as one of the world's most intolerant dictators (in the most intolerant of nations, with no freedom for other faiths or faithlessness), guilty of an unknown (but apparantly enormous) number of murder/rape/robbery/assault etc victims due to islamic street jihad agitated for from madrassas, mosques, schools, universities etc that he has sponsored/sanctioned. Not to forget the Millions in Darfur etc whose blood is on his & his good pal's (Sudan's "president" Bashir, who is wanted for arrest by the Haague) hands.
When you know the real forces (i.e. islam's ideological soul) behind the Origin of islam you have only two choices left:
1 Puke & commit apostasy, or
2 Continue as nothing has happened, i.e. being a bigot/hypocrite muslim. Or maybe you're an extremist who really likes true original islam?!
The third alternative, i.e. reforming islam, is hypothetical & impossible, precisely because the very backbone of the original islam (i.e. Koran's infidel racism+slavery+rapetivism+apostasy ban jihad) of course, contradicts everything a normal* & decent world citizen would agree on today.
Saudi "king" Abdullah has long since given up any dream of reconciling islam with the inevitable power of Western civilization based on technology & negative human rights (after having read it you hopefully understand why "responsibilities" aren't & cannot be connected to Negative Human Rights, only to democratic laws which don't violate NHR)! Abdullah understands that he has eventually to submit to "Western" civilization, although he wants to squeeze out as much as possible of his evil medieval Leviathan. Runs in the family.
However, although Abdullah's KAUST (the new Saudi university paid by Western tech money the "House of Sand, um, Saud" has stolen from others) is presented by "king" Abdullah as a "scientific center that embraces all peoples" & that it's "the first line of defense against extremism", it still preserves extremely outdated sex segregation. So for example, aren't women allowed to swim in the same pool as men**, etc etc. So no matter how "radical" (from an islamic point of view) KAUST will still stick to sexist customs we in the West haven't seen for >100 yrs!
According to "king" Abdullah "faith and science cannot compete except in unhealthy souls". I agree, letting a totalitarian monogod into your soul will inevitably make it filthy - see Klevius definition of religion). This means that he has given up islam's validity in one of the most essential parts of modern life.
And always remember that Klevius blogs/sites are the only ones***, so far, addressing the very root cause, i.e. sex segregation! A burqa or veil is almost always remote controlled by a Mohammed copy! Except, of course, when it's not just feeble minded fashion.
Read Islam doesn't deserve Human Rights
* As has been repeatedly stated on this & other KLEVUX/Klevius blogs/sites, Klevius is an extremely normal world citizen. Why/how? Because instead of resting his morality via a "god" he takes it from his fellow world citizens. As everyone (except many monogod people) already knows, building one's moral on a private "god" (i.e. a moral black hole) or on a totalitarian "god", both reduces the responsibilities of the individual (see Klevius Definition of religion)!
** As you know, in islam it's believed that (muslim) men cannot see a woman without risking getting mad!
*** Yes, it's a heavy burden, but I have to admit it's a lot of fun as well. Why? Because it has grown so big, yet is still so simple. When Wollstonecraft in the 1790s wrote abt sex segregation most women had no access to her writings or possibility to really evaluate their segregated position. However, while sex segregation has become utterly visible in modernity, its defense has grown at an equal rate starting with Victorian time psychoanalysis etc (see e.g. Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden) & feminism/chauvinism (to understand this you may read From Klevius without love), & of course, the ultimate sex segregation, islam. This defense has now become such a big bubble that nothing could be easier than picking its monstrous contradictions. If you just want/dare to do it!
Friday, October 09, 2009
CONgrats to islam's Saudi caliph & his puppet, to the Nobel prize! Real dynamite against the free world!
Islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, again got the peace prize! What would islam do without Alfred Nobel's dynamite?
Mr X "president's" (Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro - or whatever) dearest friends are "the guardians of islam" in the extremely intolerant & totalitarian fascist "house of Saud". "King" Abdullah for whom he so deeply bows has been for long top rated on the lists of the worlds most notorious dictators! Btw way, Mr X is a born muslim & later an adopted muslim who has hidden all records of his past! Btw, being a muslim makes you undemocratic. Islam wants to replace freedom & islam wants to confine you if you are a girl/woman. You can't leave your evil "faith" & you can't even love someone who doesn't share this evil "faith"! So either you ought to leave islam (i.e. committing apostasy, its worst crime & its deepest evilness) or you leave your right to participate in the democratic process. Third option being that you cheat as sanctioned by Koran (or are youä in fact, that dumb & ignorant so you dion't get it as yet?!)!
Wondering abt the Obama pic? Ok, can you tell who is a "moderate muslim" eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from islam's muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations). Btw, Mr X's first call as "president" was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the violent Nation of Islam & Black Panthers guy at his right ear (same guy who arranged & paid for his Harvard studies) while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist leader of American muslims, who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!
Winston Churchill (Europe's World War 2 hero) also won a Nobel prize, although in literature (he was rightly nominated for the peace Nobel prize as well, but never got it although he defeated Hitler & the Germans). Here's an excerpt from Churchill's pencil, The River War - An Historical Account of the Reconquest of the Soudan (written in the late 19th Century):
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men."
The Nobel peace prize committee also supported Yasser Arafat while he deliberatley ended the Middleast peace process by - yes, violence, shortly after the award! Mr X "presoident" is abt to double his war in Afganistan (or admit total surrender to the islamofascist Taliban terrorists) & has already escallated the use of deadly drone attacks against civilians in Pakistan & Afganistan. He has increased the violence in Afganistan by sending more troops to an extent that it soon approaches the numbers of the initial Iraq war! He is mongering hatred against Iran & preparing for violence against the country which is inhabited by mainly Shiite muslims, i.e. what his master, Saudi "king" Abdullah (& Co) consider apostates & arch enemies.
This was the most disastrous decision so far by the Nobel committee. Mr X has done nothing for the free world (rather the opposite), just talked!
Excuse me, but who mentioned nukes? The only reason Mr X talks abt nuke stop now is to connect it to Iran's "possible" future threat of weapons of massdestruction (which no one knows anything abt today - just like in Saddam Hussein's Iraq - so to satisfy his Sunni islamic Saudi master(s) against the only threat (Shia Iran) to their total islamic dominance in Mideast.
Klevius concluding comment: This extremely dangerous islamophilia may end up in an escallated civil war within the islamic Umma itself (yes, I know, the Umma has NEVER been peaceful). A war at the doorstep of the Nobel society & other islamophils who paved the way for it. Last major clash between Sunni & Shia "peaceful islam" was local (Iran-Iraq war 1980-88) but managed to produce more than half a Million dead & a couple of Millions victimized!
Islamic sexist/racist infidel totalitarianism is from its very beginning fueled by the opposite to peace, i.e. jihad. The only peace known to islam is the infidel slave's submission under it (& of course, muslim girls/women)! Read abt its true origin & its Sharia slave finance on Origin of islam
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Why don't say it as it is?!
Judaism started with rapetivism/circumcision & spread via the old Vagina gate. The Jewish variant was turbocharged compared to conventional tribal procreation.
Early Christianity was a reaction against rapetivism, although it later became a sexist state religion. The real boost for patriarchal Christianity wasn't the Romans but the attacks from islam which caused strengthened Catholicism. This, of course, was later protested & caused the industrial revolution that created our modern world (no stupid, it wasn't the European's fair complexion!).
Islam hence was the ultimate rapetivism because contrary to Judaism it spread via men. This is why there are now less than 10 Million Jews but almost as many muslims as there are Chinese!
The founding of Israel, in the midst of the morally, technologically & economically deprived islamic Mideast, meant that Westernized (i.e. civilized, if we by this mean democracy & human rights) Jews were able to create an enlightened oasis of wonder in the dark islamic desert.
This is why ortodox Jews & muslims have so much in common!
And this is why muslim Arabs benefitted not only from jobs created by Israel but also by the welfare they have received from the Western civilization.
Islam was from scratch technologically & culturally impotent & parasitic & still is - while sponging on the Vagina & Western oil!
Sunday, October 04, 2009
Islam's ultimate suicide bomb, created by Mohammed & distributed by the Saud/Wahhab slave/oil mafia & their puppet "apostate"!
The "apostate" & the apostates, & the ultimate islamic suicide bomb
Whereas Rifqa Bary & Ayaan Hirsi Ali (both on the escape from islam in the "free" USA) are true apostates from the evil racist/sexist islamic "faith" politics, we don't really know abt Mr X "president" Barry Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever). Born to a muslim father means he is certainly a muslim
according to Koran/islam. Trying to stretch this fact will quickly
shred the very soul of islam, i.e. that in islam everything should be done to make it esay to become a muslim (by birth or rape) & extremely hard to get out. And if that's not enough Mr X is later adopted by another muslim father. What we do know is that he says he "respects" a totalitarian racist/sexist ideology that in every meaningful bit contradicts the freedom ideal put down in the US constitution, & that he embraces the murderous hate mongering Saudi Caliph "king" Abdullah & Co. His least fault is probably that his birt status doesn't comply with the US Constitution (he isn't "natura born" & that he for that reason has used Millions of dollars to hide ALL his records (except for a, in this context, meaningless computer extract!
So this ambassador for evil racist & sexist islam, & Saudi puppet "president" blinks all islam's atrocities & all the hundreds of Millions of islam's victims, including Rifqa Bary & the ambassadress for freedom from islamic persecution, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, while the hypocrites & the ignorant applaud him.
The first years of islam were at least equally evil as the 1400 that followed & which history the islamic countries (O.I.C) desperately wants to forbid digging in
The origin of islam(also compare Klevius revealing Viking history)
Thomas Jefferson & John Adams in a 1786 report to the Continental Congress asked the representative of Tripolitania, Sidi Haji Rahmand Adja, why the Barbary states (Morocco, Algerian, Tunisia & Libya) attacked “Infidel ships, seized the cargos & sailors & enslaving those who could not be ransomed. The answer was “…that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Steven Groeneveld: One has to be a bit weak in the head to start with to buy into any religion.
Klevius comment: Or willing to sell one's soul to Satan as did Faust(us), an old European theme brilliantly exposed by Marlowe, poetically castrated by Goethe & transferred to a modern techno ghost between green but naive femininity & rational but presumptuous masculinity in Klevius short movie Pandora's Box.
The 1400 yrs long burning fuse in the bomb in Mohammed's head is about to finish!