Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Mr X “president” promotes anti-human rights & islamic terrorists, while BBC, Wikipedia etc. continue their lies abt "islamic science"
Mr X “president” has the nerve to defend the Islamic Uyghur jihadists by referring to their “human rights”, well knowing that islamic “human rights” are the very opposite to the real 1948 Human Rights declaration! Whereas the latter defend freedom the former deny freedom!
At Mr X "president's" right ear his Nation of Islam mentor who is deeply involved with the Saud gangster family. At his left ear his friend, the leader of US muslims who also happens to be a follover of Saudi Wahabism! Underneath we have his fellows at CAIR (an influential US islamist organization now busy fighting a poor 17 yr old girl who doesn't want to be a muslim anymore, & who fears her muslim father will kill her because of this) who reward a US muslim, Muzzammil Hassan, who beheaded his divorcing wife, just like the islamic Kosovo terrorist Ibrahim Shkupolli did in Finland!
Mr X "president's marriage with OIC
The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) cited Rashad Hussain (Mr X “president’s newly appointed envoy to OIC, i.e. the Organization of the Islamic Conference which hides Sharia under the title “islamic human rights”) as saying that an islamic terrorist was the victim of “politically motivated persecutions for to squash dissent.” Rashad Hussain’s comment came in connection with Sami al-Arian, a university professor and activist sentenced in 2006 for conspiring to aid islamic Jihad. U.S. (Attorney-General John Ashcroft) described this particular one as “one of the most violent terrorist organizations in the world.”
HOW COME THAT ISLAM IS NEVER THE CAUSE TO THE ATROCITIES THE PERPETRATORS REFER TO ISLAM?! IF A THUG BRAKES INTO YOUR HOME & OCCUPIES IT, DO YOU THEN CONSIDER YOUR POSSESSIONS AS RIGHTLY BELONGING TO THIS THUG?!
BBC, Wikipedia etc. lying abt "islamic science"
Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius - see Origin of islam - or by digging history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open historical "secret" of islam's fuel: (booty, sex & slavery) & due cultural & technological impotency. So when someone talks abt "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most people don't check these lies & haven't all read Klevius as yet.
The last example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious islamic mass murderer & slaverer (one of the worst known to history - also called the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned & let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.
But BBC & Wikipedia happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)! Check for youraself while I go puking.
The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil & only pope of islam - and needs to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be released & his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task, doesn't it.
It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?