Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Klevius Kalevala Day lesson: The God distortion of Kalevala


Only an Atheist reading of Kalevala has a chance of penetrating Lönnroth's and others God filter



 
Keith Boseley: The original Kalevala metre remains a mystery. Many Finns and translators into a variety of languages make matters worse by following Schiefner. The present English translator has learnt from his native tradition, begun by Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey’s (1516/17 – 1547) sixteenth-century versions of Virgil, by avoiding original metres. Thousands of lines before tackling the Kalevala, I developed a syllabic line of seven — sometimes five, less often nine — owing something to medieval Welsh. This has enabled me, in my Oxford World’s Classics edition, to translate almost literally:

Words shall not be hid
nor spells be buried;
night shall not sink underground
though the mighty go.

Klevius comment: But compare Klevius' even more literal translation below.

Keith Boseley: The Song of Hiawatha, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s 1855 long narrative poem, imitated Schiefner for his retelling of Native American legends, and has proved a bestseller ever since, despite endless — and deserved — parodies by Lewis Carroll, among others. Result: for readers of English, the Kalevala is in trochaic tetrameters. W. F. Kirby (1844 – 1912), the English entomologist and folklorist whose 1907 version was the first complete English translation from the Finnish, rendered it thus:

Till no spells are hidden from me,
Nor the spells of magic hidden,
That in caves their power is lost not,
Even though the wizards perish.

In the original Finnish version of the Kalevala, published in 1849 (17: 523 – 526):

Ei sanat salahan joua
eikä luottehet lovehen;
mahti ei joua maan rakohon,
vaikka mahtajat menevät.


Klevius translation in an as good as possible reflection of the Finnish original:

Not words in secret have to go
nor confidences in grooves
power won't end in gaps of the ground
even if the mighty ones go

Compared to Keith Boseley's translation:
Words shall not be hid
nor spells be buried;
night shall not sink underground
though the mighty go.


Can you see the borderline between racist Godism and a less biased Atheist reading? And remember, even Lönnroth and most of his singers were also God-biased in their racist/sexist hatred for the Pagan Saami people in the North.
Also consider Klevius writings about the Finnish Mongoloid complex as well as Out of Africa as bipedal apes and back as global mongoloids.


.




 .

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Cardinal Turkson warns for muslim rapetivism but blames its result on the West

Is it time to hide the Vatican under a dome?





African wannabe pope Cardinal Turkson (explaining his video show "Muslim demography" at the Vatican): “The point was to highlight the demographic situation as a result of the anti-life tendency and culture in the Western world”.

Klevius: Would you believe it! This nut-head rather attacks the West and women's Human Rights than the real evil, islam, which basic doctrine is to impregnate as many girls/women as possible with male Sharia muslimhood. And he clearly seems to think that we are too few on the planet and that it's a sin that Westerners don't reproduce at the same pace. Or...?!

African wannabe pope Cardinal Turkson: “For me to attack islam would be to attack my own family. My paternal uncle was a muslim and he took care of me when I was a boy, and when he grew old I took care of him until he died.”

Klevius: So this Ghana boy obviously lacked any Western ties hence making attacks on the West legitimate!
.

.

Monday, February 25, 2013

UK muslims ok gay marriage. Klevius question: How many partners can a muslim gay marriage have? Eight, nine or ten for men and two or zero for women?!


Preaching hatred is an islamic value - just check out OIC's Human Rights violating Sharia manifesto!


.



The House of Commons voted to legalise gay marriage inBritain


Murtaza Ali Shah (http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-21033-UK-Muslim-MPs-scared-after-voting-for-gay-marriage-bill): Muslim MPs Sadiq Khan, Rushanara Ali, Sajid Javid, Shabana Mahmood and Anas Sarwar all voted for the move while Benazir Bhutto’s former adviser Rehman Chishti voted against and Yasmin Qureshi and Khalid Mahmood MP abstained.

At least three Pakistani clerics have said that these MPs needed to repent and renew their faith, which means that they stand expelled from the circle of Islam for supporting same sex marriages.

Muslim MPs have privately said that they fear for their lives after the delivery of fatwas on them by clerics.

Anjem Chaudhry, former UK head of Al-Muhajiroum who has organised demonstrations against the MPs, said the Muslim MPs have committed “apostasy by declaring war on Allah and His Messenger (PBUH) by voting for gay marriages”. He added: “These MPs have allied themselves with parties that are responsible for the killing of Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere.”

Mufti Muhammad Aslam Naqshbandi of Jamia Islmai Rizvia Southfield said Muslim MPs stand outside Islam after voting in favour of gay marriages and rebelling against Islam’s teachings.

Hizbut Tahrir (Klevius comment: The islamist group connected to Sayeeda Warsi) Britain said “some people hold up these MPs as examples for young Muslims to follow yet nothing could be further from the truth”.

Klevius: UK’s main religious institutions, as for example, the Catholic Church, most muslim organisations, Sayeeda Warsi and other leading figures of the Conservative Party have opposed the bill. So it's really speeding up for the old Leviathan islam now in the interface between backwardness and Westernization.

Can you feel the stench of 1400 years of the worst racist/sexist religious hate crime ever? And can you see who represent it today?





.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Klevius God-tutorial: The problem with religion is that God's evil

Last time (a week ago or so) Klevius mentioned Syria, some 60,000 had died to the shouts of "Allahu Akbar". Today they're over 70,000! However, although Allahu has been the greatest reference throughout 1400 years for murder, torture, assault, intimidation, terror etc, the very origin of islam, namely Koranic Sharia slavery (including rapetivism) has not at all got the attention it deserves despite the fact that islamic slavery, without any doubts, is the longest, worst and most extensive history knows about.

The only possible moral "Arab Spring" is without a God - and it's called Human Rights!

 



 
Genesis 1:26: “Let's make man in our image". Klevius: Who wrote this? Narcissus?!





How many “great Allahs” are there in the “islamic monotheism”?

We need to bury God once and for all to get rid of God-fascism.

And you morons who say that religion is bad but that you still believe in God actually hence support religious fascism.

Islamofascists love islam's inborn sexism and racism, not “Allah”, but they need God to make their fascism a religion.

Klevius: Islam offends me and my Human Rights! Where should I complain? If islam adapts to Human Rights it will suffer the same “islamophobia” as Klevius! Religion is an excuse for violating Human Rights .



No dude, your "personal God*" is no good either

* read about the etymology of the world's oldest root of the words 'God' and 'good'

The more you live as you observe the physical world around you the more you come to the conclusion that everything has a determined process to it. God needs always to be placed outside determinism. And no matter where you focus you will only find determinism. Honestly, where do you expect to find lack of reason, i.e. lack of cause and effect?! Did you say Heisenberg? Don't try make me laugh with such empty jokes!

K Schenk: Can you connect to God without religion? Is there a difference between God and religion? There is definitely a difference between God and religion. God is someone I have a relationship with.
Klevius: In fact, having "a personal relation to God" serves only two functions:

1 as a disposer for your own immorality/failures, which means a limitation to your possible moral etc growth (see Negative Human Rights).


2 a limitation to the very soul of life. God functions like an old sofa in your garage. It takes up space and potential that could be in better use.

Remember that what makes life worth living is the same as what makes football worth playing. What excites you is uncertainty and what bores you is certainty. And you can't play football with God because football is determinism and God is always outside determinism.

But the worst thing with your "personal God" is that when you tick him he becomes a collective evil.


See what Klevius wrote about this religious man already a year ago
.






 .

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

BBC again lies straight up your face about Saudi "human rights"! How long will you take it?!

 This "news" is as far from the truth you can possibly get. Moreover, it's deliberately misleading! There are no Human Rights in the Saudi system, only Sharia. And BBC knows it but deliberately uses people's ignorance and OIC's treacherous cover name 'islamic human rights', i.e. Sharia (i.e. the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights" in islam'). And BBC does it at the same time as the Saudi dictator family and OIC work for a global criminalization of criticism against Sharia (i.e. "islamophobia"). In other words, to defend Human Rights is already a crime in Saudi Arabia and soon near you!

Fawziah al Bakr is not a "human rights activist" but a Sharia supporter. Otherwise she should have been jailed long time ago.

And be assured that the women in the Saudi Shura Council are 100% Sharia compliant and that they would never defend Human Rights when they differ from Sharia. Not even the most basic ones such as, for example, equality between the sexes (sexism) and equality between muslims and others etc (racism).

And what about 6 year olds and 9 year olds etc?!



.





.

 .

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Manifesto murderers


Are you excused for murder if you have a "manifesto"?


Two mad manifesto murderers - but only one (the black one) causes "critical investigation" about factors that led to his deeds


Christopher Dorner and Anders Breivik


Oops! Take it easy now! Before you say anything, make sure you don't excuse the black guy for him targeting only whites and latinos and the white guy targeting mainly white islam supporters. Only then comes the manifestos, which, in fact, have no connection whatsoever with these murderous deeds. Everyone can write a "manifesto" and many do when they can't handle their personal life any longer and they see the end coming. So they spread their individual hatred via others "to redeem their name and pride". There's always a bad excuse for committing violent acts other than in 100% cases of self defense - as was most likely the case when Zimmerman was about to be killed by Trayvon Martin!




Trayvon Martin in a nutshell

Witnesses and facts support Zimmerman's version in every detail, yet few seems to bother. Why?

A 13-year-old boy walking his dog saw a man on the ground shortly before the shooting and identified him as wearing red (as did Zimmerman).

A witness to the confrontation just prior to the shooting stated that Martin was on top of Zimmerman and punching him, while Zimmerman was yelling for help. He stated that "the guy on the bottom, who had a red sweater on, was yelling to me, 'Help! Help!' and I told him to stop, and I was calling 911". He went on to say that when he got upstairs and looked down, "the guy who was on the top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point."

Wounds found on the 17-year-old's knuckles support George Zimmerman's claim that the unarmed teenager assaulted him before he was fatally shot

Zimmerman's medical report the day after the shooting,listed a broken nose, two black eyes and a cut in the back of the head.

Zimmerman's sweatshirt had "grass stains, and was wet on the back."


Zimmermann's own recollection

Zimmerman said he was driving to the grocery store when he spotted Trayvon Martin walking through the neighborhood. Zimmerman's father said that, while his son was not on duty that night as Neighborhood Watch captain, there had been many break-ins and he thought it suspicious that someone he didn't recognize was walking behind the town homes instead of on the street or the sidewalk. Zimmerman therefore called a non-emergency police line to report Martin's behavior and summon police. During the call, Zimmerman told the dispatcher that Martin was "coming to check me out." A source to the Orlando Sentinel said in May that Zimmerman told investigators that at one point Martin circled his vehicle, and he rolled up his window to avoid a confrontation.

After a discussion about where Zimmerman would meet police, Zimmerman told investigators he was returning to his vehicle when Martin approached him from his left rear and confronted him. Martin then punched him in the face, knocking him down, and began beating his head against the sidewalk. Zimmerman called out for help while being beaten, and at one point Martin covered his mouth to muffle the screams. According to Zimmerman's father, during the struggle while Martin was on top of Zimmerman, Martin saw the gun his son was carrying and said something to the effect of "You're gonna die now" or "You're gonna die tonight". Zimmerman and Martin struggled over the gun, and Zimmerman shot Martin once in the chest at close range, in self-defense.

Rodney King, O. J. Simpson, Trayvon Martin etc are all used as political tools for black racism and political etc greed.








 .


 .

Saturday, February 09, 2013

The wealthy communist and intellectual dwarf, spy prince Guillou, fights a few vulnerable and hated - intellectual dwarfs!


Jan Guillou, with a mouth the size of Scandinavia's biggest newspaper, takes on crumbs on islam's road to hegemony! But will he win?And what about OIC and its Human Rights violating Sharia?!


The Swedish "prince" Jan Guillou (author of cheap and stupid but popular story books who used to be suspected as a spy for Communist Soviet) heightens his intellectual sword as high he can in his defense of the vulnerable 1.5 billion plus oil steered muslim world Umma (Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating Sharia). And it's just high enough to hit - a few other intellectual dwarfs who aren't supported by anyone and who constitute the easiest of targets. Job well done, Jan, or! And to really point out the depth of their character and the danger they pose he informs us that these lonely individuals have problems writing simple text.

Have fun playing with the retards Jan but why continue betraying your country?!

 It says: Guillou challenges the web haters

So what about muslim street haters?



A peaceful muslim demonstration in Sweden while Guillou swings his Sharia sword. Can you recognize the peaceful muslim kicker who later seems to talk to his people?

Aeneas: The OIC is not shy in demanding that the fear of God be put into any and all who dare to question Islamic dogma.  Indeed the prime purpose of an international sharia criminal court would be to punish critics of Islamic doctrine.  Such an institution has been unknown in Europe since the days of the Inquisition.  The OICs aim is not to allow Muslims to peacefully practice their faith, but to impose that faith on those who do not want to have anything to do with it!  In any case, Mr Esfanani’s comments come on the eve of the OICs 12th Summit that takes place in Cairo this week (2).

The OIC has already indicated that it will be intensifying its efforts to curb Western freedoms which might be an indication of its intention to create an international sharia court:

    “According to the OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the leaders of Islamic nations need to have a new approach for dealing with the threats of Islamophobia.”

In his call for an observer office to combat religious intolerance, İhsanoğlu made no mention of the religious intolerance and persecution that takes place in OIC countries.  The OIC’s approach is all about imposing sharia rather than actually confronting real religious intolerance.

Muslim Saudi Arabia is the most disgusting of states. And OIC is based and steered from there! Any comments Mr Guillou. Or don't you dare to debate with people over your intellectual level?


OIC's islamofascist Fuhrer of all muslims, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, talking in Saudi Arabia 2012:     …the most important point here is that we have succeeded in the period since 2005 (the publishing of the Danish cartoons) succeeded internationally in that we issued reports from the Human Rights Council of the UN on how to deal with islamophobia… and these reports we have adopted in agreement with the US and European countries that were objecting to these reports.

    …At this moment we have the resolution 16/18 which was issued last year at the UN which forms a legal groundwork for criminalising actions that could lead to (muslim) violence… there is in the international agreement for civil and political rights (year 1966 paragraph 18) A provision that would allow us to put limits on the misuse of freedom of speech including misuse of freedom of the press, freedom of thought, the misuse of these freedoms towards others, in a sense that it would encourage to violence and to hatred based on religious belief. We have these legal bases… bases that existed for some time and new bases that we developed and the international community accepts; all we are now missing is some steps that would allow enforcement of these laws.




 I have no reason to believe that this man to the left, who was attacked by the muslim demonstrators, was an intellectual dwarf. However, it seems clear he was quite vulnerable though were he stood there alone. And when he turned to the police he was told that they weren't interested because they "didn't want any problems". The victim was then counter-reported (by the muslim kicker?) to the police for "racial agitation", apparently for him not approving of message of the muslim demonstration.








.






 .

Thursday, February 07, 2013

Klevius' connection between Eurasian iceage art and Mideastern slave parasitism/rapetivism

In sociology and anthropology research your best knowledge option is Klevius!

Here yet another example of how the world's most evil ideology and worst crime ever against humanity came to function as an excuse and cover up of its own evilness

As Klevius has written in his A Roots Guide (which ABBA's "islamophobic" Björn Ulvaeus, after some hesitation, didn't dare to publish) islamic slave raiding/trading was so extremely extensive that the whole world history during the last 1400 years has to be rewritten with this in mind. Klevius' Origin of the Vikings is just some tiny scrapings from the surface of this massive body of deliberate and institutionalized evilness that now hides itself as a "peaceful faith" among other faiths.

In A Roots Guide (which covers the whole world of islamic slavery, incl. it's Arab-Jewish predecessors, but which is still searching for a publisher - or donation to make publishing possible) Klevius also describes the extensive Koranic Arab drainage of African slaves.

So, for example, according to M Richards et al at the Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK, who have analyzed and compared mitochondrial DNA variation of populations from the Near East and Africa, found a very high frequency of African lineages present in the Yemen Hadramawt: more than a third were of clear sub-Saharan origin. Other Arab populations carried approximately 10% lineages of sub-Saharan origin, whereas non-Arab Near Eastern populations, by contrast, carried few or no such lineages, suggesting that gene flow has been preferentially into Arab populations. Several lines of evidence suggest that most of this gene flow probably occurred within the past approximately 2,500 years. In contrast, there is little evidence for male-mediated gene flow from sub-Saharan Africa in Y-chromosome haplotypes in Arab populations, including the Hadramawt. Taken together, these results are consistent with substantial migration from eastern Africa into Arabia, at least in part as a result of the Arab slave trade, and mainly female assimilation into the Arabian population as a result of miscegenation* and manumission**.

This is perfectly in line with Klevius' description of Koranic/Arabic female sex slave raiding/trading and male eunuch slave trading. African male eunuchs were usually castrated by local Africans before they were sold to the muslim Arabs because of the extremely high rate of deaths after the removal of their genitals. Sex slaves and eunuchs were the most lucrative "items" in the islamic Sharia finance. Plantation and domestic slaves were much cheaper. However, to get a rough understanding of the scale of the matter one may, for example, consider the Zanj Rebellion (869−883 AD) which was the culmination of a series of slave revolts and involved more than half a million African slaves in what is now southern Iraq. It lasted over a period of fifteen years within the muslim Abbasid caliphate.

* Miscegenation is the mixing of different racial groups through marriage, cohabitation, sexual relations, and procreation.

** Manumission in islam is mainly the abandoning of old, unattractive and non-reproductive female slaves. 



Because of islam's extensive slavery, rapetivism and genocide history the genetics of Mideast is "screwed up" in a way that, if not included in genetic calculations, will give highly misleading data about human evolution



Iceage Aurignacian Lion-man is older than previously thought and adds even more credibility to Klevius' theory on the birth of the modern human


On a line from Altai/Siberia to western Europe (and nowhere else) - the world's by far most sophisticated and oldest iceage art. How come? Read Klevius and it makes 100% sense.




This lion-headed figure from central Europe and associated with the archaeological Aurignacian culture is the oldest known zoomorphic sculpture in the world and one of the oldest known sculptures in general. The figurine has now been redated from 32,000 years to about 40,000 years old by carbon dating material from the same layer in which it was found. It is then temporary with the fantastic Denisova bracelet from Altai which is a far more sophisticated product.


This more than 40,000 year old sophisticated bracelet from Altai/Siberia represents the hereto most advanced early artifact ever found. It was located nearby the non-human "Denisovan".








.



.

Tuesday, February 05, 2013

Why are you lying, Svante Pääbo?!


Svante Paabo: "In the West there were Neanderthals, in the East there were Denisovans, maybe other forms of humans too that we've not yet described. The modern humans emerged somewhere in Africa, came out of Africa presumably in the Middle East. They meet Neanderthals, mix with them, continue to spread over the world. And somewhere in south-east Asia they meet Denisovans, mix with them, and continue on out through the Pacific."

Peter Klevius: What?!  Why do you lie to media - or at the least forget to tell them that what you call "modern humans" didn't look or behave modern at all?! Moreover, and even more importantly, you forgot to tell media that you know absolutely nothing about the genetics of these "modern" Africans you talk about! There doesn't simply exist the slightest scientific reason to connect certain extremely primitive looking remains in Africa to the Eurasian moderns (with far more sophisticated culture) that then came to populate the whole world. Why do you abuse the deep ignorance among most non-specialists? As a scientist you shouldn't mix political correctness (or whatever) with the presentation of scientific facts. Why does Klevius have to correct  you?

1) "Modern humans" couldn't have come out from Africa because they had first to arrive in Africa (see below)!

2)  If the only Denisovan (40,000-80,000 BP) we know about, so far, was found in Siberia/Altai, how then can you say that "somewhere in south-east Asia they meet Denisovans"?! Wouldn't it have been much more likely that they first encountered Denisovans more opposite to south-east Asia?!

 Again, based on what we know so far, isn't it much more likely that Denisovans spread from south-east Asia all the way to Siberia and later were extinguished by the flood of successful moderns spreading southwards, leaving most genetic traces of Denisovans around the area where they came from. As we all know south-east Asia harbored already one species of a non-modern creature (Homo floresiensis) that possessed a brain that was superior when it comes to the relation size/performance of known species at the timehttp://kleviusanthropology.blogspot.co.uk/. And all of this fit much better in Klevius' theoretical framework presented a decade ago on the web!



These portraits may all have been made in Eurasia before and/or around the ti me when modern humans reached Africa*


* No one knows for sure as yet about the time for the so called "back migration" (estim. from 21,000 to more than 30,000 BP) and as long as we don't find high level Aurignacian etc art in Africa (especially in sub-Sahara) there is no reason to believe truly modern humans were there before (more on this below).

.

.










So what is 100% clear is that nothing even close to these works and time have been found in Africa so far. So why do some people continue neglecting this important fact that has long reaching implications for our understanding of how we all evolved?! What's the problem with Africa? We haven't found these things in the Americas, West/South/SE-Asia or Australia either!





Klevius reminder: First of all! Forget all you've heard about the Afrocentric invention "Mitocondrial Eve" some 200,000 years ago. It's all proven either completely wrong or at least unreliable. Moreover, "Mitochondrial Eve" had many "sisters" who contributed similarly although their particular mt lineages ended somewhere although their genetics was passed on to us. Secondly, we can't be sure were she lived anymore because the genetic history of Africa has turned out to be a mess of migrations and back migrations. Thirdly, we don't have any clue whatsoever about how she looked like. 200,000 years ago (and probably more) even the most human like creatures we have found remains of were nothing like us in appearance or behavior. However, there is absolutely no reason to believe that "Mitochondrial Eve" had anything to do with them. She could, and more likely so, have been a small Homo floresiensis like half ape.

Long ago when I followed Leakey's etc diggings in the Rift Valley I used to combine it with the horror I felt in reading and watching films about slavery in the US (but not in Central and South America, and not muslim slave raiding/trading in Africa, Arab countries and Eurasia). And in doing this plus knowing about harsh and primitive conditions with many people starving in Africa, a pro-African bias sneaked into my understanding of the world. A bias that only disappeared with the writing of my book Demand for Resources 1992.

Today I see this kind of bias again all around me but now politically used to boast and monetize agendas of racism and sexism.




An other voice on the evolution of the modern human


According to Anatole A. Klyosov, Igor L. Rozhanskii, seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and timespans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named β-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and β-haplogroup, coined the α-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lateral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp.





.





 .

Sunday, February 03, 2013

Islam and its Human Rightsphobia offends me! Where should I complain?


If islam adapts to basic Human Rights it will suffer exactly the same “islamophobia” as Klevius! 

Translation for illiterate islamofascism supporters: The very essence of islam is what makes it incompatible with Human Rights, i.e. why OIC, all muslims' world organization, only accepts Sharia.

Opposing the most basic Human Rights hence constitutes the very definition of racism and sexism!
.


 .

Friday, February 01, 2013

Where have all the muslim racists gone?!



Is there really no such thing as muslim racism?!

A Google News search doesn't reveal any muslim racism - only racism against muslims!?






"President" Morsi of Egypt referred to Jews and Israelis as “Descendants Of Apes And Pigs” and “Bloodsuckers”



Wolff Bachner: President Morsi of Egypt referred to Jews and Israelis as “Descendants Of Apes And Pigs” and “Bloodsuckers” in a speech he made in 2010. He also called President Obama a “liar” in the same speech, which surfaced this week in a video that was openly broadcast without censorship on Egyptian television. Although the US delegation to Egypt led by Senator John McCain condemned the comments as “deeply offensive,” the racist remarks against the Jewish people and the insults to President Obama will not affect the foreign aid the United States promised Egypt. The cash strapped Middle Eastern nation is expecting another 480 million dollars of American assistance, along with the Obama administration’s promise to give 200 Abrams tanks and 10 F-16 fighter jets to the Egyptian military. One might wonder what line must be crossed before someone finally holds Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood accountable and turns off the golden tap that pours out the cash and weapons. Since his election to the presidency, Morsi has packed his Cabinet with hard line Muslim Brotherhood members, declared his policies are not subject to judicial review, and rammed a Sharia based Constitution down the throats of the Egyptian people. While Morsi continues the Arab tradition of Jew hate and hostility to Israel, the International Monetary Fund is moving full speed ahead to give Egypt another 4.8 billion dollar loan. Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/484927/morsi-called-jews-descendants-of-apes-and-pigs-us-aid-to-egypt-unaffected.


 .

.