Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Alleged Saudi sponsored UCK (Kosovo muslim terrorist org.) massmurderer Ibrahim Shkupolli also murders five (& beheads wife) in Finland
The Finnish law means nothing to islam/Sharia, Koranic beheadings, women's rights etc! Or?! I feel Finland is badly raped by the worst crime ever against humanity. Just look how the police, media & politicians withhold the truth from the Finnish people (incl. ignorant immigrants)! Sampo in the Finnish Kalevala myth was a mill, which created unlimited amounts of corn (food), salt (storage) & coins (other needs). The basis of Kalevala was the easy securing of wealth, just like islam. However, instead of islam's sponging on others, Sampo meant real production, not only reproduction!
Update 1 Jan 2010: Klevius hunch seems right again (as you know Klevius never picks at random)! Ibrahim Shkupolli seems (allegedly killed one of his his wives in a "very grim" way) to have decapitated his wife in a purely islamic fashion. Just like Hasan did (the awarded US muslim guy on Klevius Obama pic)! His ex-wife didn't obey islamic Sharia but probably dated a non-muslim (one of the guys killed at the mall)! And of course you know that Kosovo is steered by Saudi Wahhabism. You morons out there, what makes ALL islam evil & impossible is its basic infidel racism/sexism coupled to a one way reproduction of new muslims (Sharia & apostasy ban - btw, doesn't it disturb you at all that muslim women aren't allowed to decide over their own love life?! And that no one is allowed to leave islam!?)! You can't be a true muslim without it! Islam lacks what Negative Human Rights offer, equality! And yes, I know, you need a brain to get it!
Anonymous posting on Finnish website: "Ibrahim Shkupolli on UCK:n vanhoja veteraaneja. Tappoi Qelan kylässä 32 serbisiviiliä vuonna 1997. Osallistui myös taisteluihin serbipoliiseja vastaan. On ollut etsintäkuulutettu Serbiassa jo vuodesta 1995."
Klevius translation: Ibrahim Shkupolli is a UCK/KLA (Kosovo Liberation Army - i.e. muslim terrorists) veteran. He killed 32 Serb civilians in the Qela village in 1997. Also fought against Serb police. He is wanted in Serbia already since 1995.
Klevius comment: No matter how mentally disturbed these people are, Saudi islamic hatemongering (infidel racism/sexism) offers an extra excuse to act!
End of original posting.
Beheading is part of islam's evil Mohammedan heritance, & used today, not only by individual jihadists, but also by the Saudi "guardians of islam" while Western politicians just bow!
Decapitation in Islamic Theology
Radhasyam Brahmachari: In his Saudi-distributed translation of the Qur'an, 'Abdullah Yusuf 'Ali (d. 1953) wrote that the injunction to "smite at their necks," should be taken both literally and figuratively. "You cannot wage war with kid gloves,"
Timothy R. Furnish: The practice of beheading non-Muslim captives extends back to the Prophet himself. Ibn Ishaq (d. 768 C.E.), the earliest biographer of Muhammad, is recorded as saying that the Prophet ordered the execution by decapitation of 700 men of the Jewish Banu Qurayza tribe in Medina for allegedly plotting against him. Islamic leaders from Muhammad's time until today have followed his model.
Saudi Arabia uses public beheading as the punishment for murder, rape, drug trafficking, sodomy, armed robbery, apostasy and certain other offences. 2007 was the record year for executions with 153 men and three women executed. Forty five men and two women were beheaded in 2002, a further 52 men and 1 woman in 2003 and 35 men and a woman in 2004. Executions rose in 2005 with 88 men and 2 women being beheaded and then reduced to 35 men and four women in 2006. 102 people were executed in Saudi Arabia during 2008 but it is thought that two of these were by shooting in Asir Province.
The condemned of both sexes are typically given tranquillisers and then taken by police van to a public square or a car park after midday prayers. Their eyes are covered and they are blindfolded. The police clear the square of traffic and a sheet of plastic sheet about 16 feet square is laid out on the ground.
Dressed in either a white robe or their own clothes, barefoot, with shackled feet and hands cuffed behind their back, the prisoner is led by a police officer to the centre of the sheet where they are made to kneel facing Mecca. An Interior Ministry official reads out the prisoner's name and crime to the crowd.
Saudi Arabia uses a traditional Arab scimitar which is 1100-1200 mm long. The executioner is handed the sword by a policeman and raises the gleaming scimitar, often swinging it two or three times in the air to warm up his arm muscles, before approaching the prisoner from behind and jabbing him in the back with the tip of the blade, causing the person to raise their head. (see photo) Then with a single swing of the sword the prisoner is decapitated.
Normally it takes just one swing of the sword to sever the head, often sending it flying some two or three feet. Paramedics bring the head to a doctor, who uses a gloved hand to stop the fountain of blood spurting from the neck. The doctor sews the head back on, and the body is wrapped in the blue plastic sheet and taken away in an ambulance. Burial takes place in an unmarked grave in the prison cemetery.
Beheadings of women did not start until the early 1990’s, previously they were shot (Klevius comment: Mohammed saved women as sex slaves just as he saved female infants). Forty three women have been publicly beheaded up to the end of 2007.
Most executions take place in the three major cities of Riyadh, Jeddah and Dahran. Saudi executioners take great pride in their work and the post tends to be handed down from one generation to the next.
Consciousness is probably lost within 2-3 seconds, due to a rapid fall of the “intracranial perfusion of blood"
For detailed information on the situation in Saudi Arabia
Klevius comment: Christian or other services, even at home, in Saudi Arabia, if being caught, renders death by beheading in the town square on the Fridays prayer.
Islam is the most intolerant (i.e. racist) ideology on Earth. This is islam's very essence & logic, i.e. to cover all aspects of life hence strangling freedom, i.e. a totalitarian fascist ideology! So no wonder Saudi Arabia, (the "guardian of islam" & Mr X "president's" favourite nation) is the most intolerantä Everything else would be a deception against islam.
Heard on the net: "Radical Muslims" are those that are peaceful, tolerant, and kind towards others, in direct contradiction to the requirements of the Koran."
Klevius comment: Also consider that according to Koran 3:28, you shouldn't "have unbelieving friends unless it is to deceive them."
Shkupolli is a product of Saudi islamic hatemongering, as is Kosovo! Mitrovica, Shkupolli's hometown, lies just some 40 km from what used to be a Saudi Wahhabist terrorist camp near Novi Pazar in Serbia's southern Raska (or Sandzak) region, close to the Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro borders. In Novi Pazar the principal business of the city used to be crime: illegal smuggling of consumer goods, heroin and weapons.
How Saudi Arabia established an islamic theocracy in Europe by the help of US Dems & a naive (or deliberate) Finnish socialist ex-president
When Saudi Arabia recognized Kosovo the text clearly reveals the islamist & anti-democratic agenda: "...in line with the existing religious and cultural bonds with the people Kosovo, and in respect to the will of the people Kosovo to obtain independence,...". The trick is the word 'and', & the "existing religious and cultural bonds", of course means islam (in its deepest sense). So because islam always goes before anything else (incl. democracy), what the Saudis "recognized" was a totalitarian islamic theocracy! You heard that, Matti Ahtisaari!
This Saudi trick follows exactly the same pattern as the introduction of OIC's Cairo Declaration on Islamic "Human Rights" (i.e. Sharia), aimed as an islamic bullwork against true Human Rights from 1948! In the Cairo Declaration women are robbed of all their freedom & rights under the cover of "duties", "dignity", "responsibilities" etc (see The Declaration on how to destroy human rights)!
Klevius suggestion: Remove the "Saudi" from Saudi Arabia!
Sunday, December 27, 2009
WHAT A MEDIA HYPOCRISY WHEN THE MUSLIM NIGERIAN TERRORIST IS DESCRIBED AS "EXTREMIST" WHILE HIS TALIBAN LIKE SHARIA ISLAMIC HOME TOWN (stonings, mutilations, corrupt "Sharia banking" etc) IS DESCRIBED AS "MODERATE"! North Nigeria is a disgusting reminder of islamic slavery & islam's devastating effects on Africa through 1400 yrs! AND CONSIDER THAT KLEVIUS HAS FOR LONG BEEN YOUR ONLY TRUE, INTELLIGENT & WELL INFORMED NEUTRAL (yes!) VOICE AGAINST EVILSEX SEGREGATION ON THE NET (the link is abt women's football as well)!
Did Germany's Birgit Prinz, score the best ever goal (incl. those of men) in 2009?
1 The attack (from an in-throw) was as clean as it gets. Check out the video & consider how Simone Laudehr's extremely well placed pass (into an open but crucial area) is taken by Inka Grings who was initially further from the ball than Prinz, who runs in the opposite direction.
2 Inka Grings then does just the opposite to what one would have expected. Instead of running with the ball into the empty space from where she could have tried a cross to Birgit Prinz, she turns against & between two defenders and quickly squares the ball across the penalty area just before Birgit Prinz encounters the defenders.
3 Birgit Prinz accelerates strongly & manages not only to reach the ball before a defender crashes into her, but also to cheat the goalkeeper (see how the keeper moves to the wrong direction) while then perfectly turning her foot in the last fraction of a second to give the ball ultimate precision, before she is smashed to the ground by the flying defender.
Who said women's football is boring?
Size doesn't matter in football
However, although Birgit Prinz is a six footer (179 cm), in footbal you can be any size & still world class. Lionel Messi, the world's best male player 2009 is 169 cm/67 kg, while the next best (Xavi) is 170 cm/69 kg! Third place Ronaldo is 185 cm. Among women Marta da Silva (162 cm/57 kg) is the world's best player for the fourth year in a row, with Birgit Prinz right behind!
Football is the most emancipating sport in the world
This goal hasn’t even been mentioned among the best, perhaps because women’s football is hardly mentioned at all in the media. And the reason for this is the same as with evil islam, namely that so many women participate in directing girls into the sex segregation trap of their own *starting physically with Indonesian muslim women who mutilate every female child, to Western glamour feminists who push their daughters into the time consuming trap of empty & pointless artificial "feminization".
As Otto Weininger put it a century ago: "The main obstacle for women's emancipation is the Woman".
Klevius doesn't in any sense want to point out how women should behave, quite the contrary. He couldn't call himself intelligent if he would, could he! However, what Klevius does want to do is to help minimizing the number of girls who limit themselves or commit self rape becaudse of cultural sexism. In this Klevius stands in the deapest oppositition to islam, while Mr X US "president" says he "respect" islam (and no wonder, look at his islamofascist pals)!
Origin of islam & its evil parasitic booty/sex/slavery/reproduction formula
Btw, a professor friend (sociology) thinks I “uber-emphasize” sex segregation. My question then to him & to all of you is: How can one ever “uber-emphasize” something that affects negatively & directly HALF of the world population, & indirectly the WHOLE of the world population, & which is upheld on no logical grounds at all?! And which constitutes the cornerstone for the evil interface between islam & the rest of the world! And which constitutes the main difference in OIC's Cairo Declaration which (initiated by Saudi islamic theocracy) aims for the destruction of UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration, combined with a global effort (via UN) to criminalize criticism of islam! Read more from Klevius (e.g. From Freud to bin Laden or What is sex segregation?) to understand why islam & feminism share so much & why the first feminists didn't support votes for women! And why feminists can't agree if Mary Wollstonecraft was a feminist or an anti-feminist!
Or perhaps Klevius Marriage, kinship & friendship
Or even better, the most important sociological paper from the last century: Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state
Friday, December 11, 2009
ISLAM (Sharia OIC) IS THE WORST CRIME IN HISTORY & THE WORST THREAT TO THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN! The very soul of islam was from scratch the parasitic enslavement of "infidels" (note that "muslim" women are also "infidels" under the sex segregated dhimmitude of Sharia that Klevius names rapetivism). A low estimate gives 300 Million dead during slave "pilgrimage" (only in Basra in the 9th Century islam had between 0.5-1 Million Zanj, i.e. African, plantation slaves! Add eunuchs & female sex slaves!).
OIC map of evil
Islamic Sharia cancer/rapetivism is also the world's worst polluter!
Slavery in Koran
Sharia finance has always been parasitic. Islam is economically impotent in itself. That's why Mohammed was a robberer! So you "prince" Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud(or whatever), instead of using the money the non-islamic civilization has poured into your lap, for boosting evil islam, decent moral would suggest you to do the opposite, namely to help islam's slaves to get rid of this evil ideology from the past!
Islam's Saudi puppet "president" Mr X'Obama now adds Yemen to his bombing campaign!
A muslim born apostate US "president" Mr X who can't stop telling us how much he respects islam & its criminal dictators & the world threatening OIC.
Two UK muslim peers, one (Ahmed) who allegedly killed because of reckless (sms?) driving, & who threatened the peace of UK & its parliament with 10,000 islamic street jihadists, & one (Warsi) who calls her fellow muslims "idiots" when they follow the Koran & Mohammed.
A fanatic (Khalid) Saudi connected black muslim supremacist (Black Panthers, Nation of Islam etc) who sponsored & mentored Mr X & "arranged" his admission to Harvard for transfer to the senate & all the way up to the White House. Seen from the eyes of ignorance it could have been a sunshine story. But it isn't, islam is the worst crime ever against humanity & OIC (56 muslim nations & Palestine) with its horrifying Sharia commitment, constitute the worst threat to humanity now & here. And Mr X "president" knows very well the OIC agenda, yet still applauds it!
Mr X close friend (Ingrid Matson) who leads all American muslims towards a US Sharia constitution.
The Saudi Caliph of all muslims
& his close friend Bashir who is wanted by the Haague for crimes against humanity in Darfur.
Muslims from CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations) an organization founded by Al-Qaeda which is guarding the spread of Sharia islam in the US, & which is a frequent guest in the White House.
The fat guy whom they award on the pic is the very same Hasan who started Bridges TV for the purpose of correcting "misunderstandings abt islam". Hasan then murdered his divorcing apostate wife by stabbing her nine times & then ritually fulfilled Sharia by decapitating her.
Klevius comment: Excuse me, did I hear "milder forms of Sharia"?! Look again! E.g. how the "moderate" SE Asian muslim nations inevitably are slipping towards Aceh's medieval stoning etc! Look at Saudi Arabia which is now busy lashing a 75 yr old woman for her violating islamic sex segregation!
Isn't it the real sign of evil when islam first sucks blood from Africa for 1400 yrs, leaving it with a deadly chronical disease (islam) which has effectively hindered its development, & then comes back with Western oil money & accuses the West for islam's crimes! What do you think "prince" Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud(or whatever)? Or has your schizophrenic moral between islam & the West made you chronically unable to think?!
You who laughted at Klevius six yrs ago will probably cry after six more yrs. Pls note that what was considered "polemic" "tendentious" "extreme" etc text six yrs ago is now more or less common islam criticism (except, of course, for the most important insight of Klevius namely how islam is married via sex segregation to the "Judeo-Christian" influence in the West).
The only reform suitable for islam is its worst crime & fault, namely full apostasy.
Klevius acknowledgement: I've introduced the word 'rapetivism' as to describe the innermost evil of islam, the very core of its sex segregation. When Mohammed got attracted to the teen girl Safiyah he also wanted to rape her. Just like with the teenage Zaynab Mohammed got aroused after having peeped at her. Mumin Salih: "Muhammad was struck by the attractive figure of near-naked beautiful Zaynab, and went away saying: “Praise be to Allah, who can change how the heart feels”. The meaning of this ‘prayer’ is that Muhammad’s feeling toward Zaynab is now different from what it was, when he asked her to marry Zayd. In other words, he wasn’t attracted to her before, but now he is. What has changed in Zaynab that made Muhammad feel attracted to her? Obviously, when Muhammad peeped at Zaynab, he did not ‘see’ a change in her personality, but a nearly naked woman with a sexy figure." A medical definition of Peeping Tom: "This disorder involves achieving sexual arousal by observing an unsuspecting and non-consenting person who is undressing or unclothed. This behavior may conclude with masturbation by the voyeur who does not seek sexual consent with the person he is observing." Klevius comment: Mohammed wasn't only a Peeping Tom but also a rapist.
Ayesha Ahmed: How Mohammed Acquired Safiyah as His Sex-slave
Safiyah realized resistance was futile. She will get raped any ways, either by prophet or another jihadi. At least Prophet had a regular supply of slave-girls from his 20% cut of booty and many resident wives. She will be hit less for sex less often... With a regular jihadi she will be raped day and night then sold in a slave market to the highest bidder. She gave up the fight and laid motionless while the prophet got his jollies.
See what is really said in Arabic & compare to the lies abt islam spread in the West
From the robberer Mohammed to Saudi Arabia & OIC
Although UK "political baroness" Warsi shouts on the streets that Sharia muslims are "idiots", Klevius includes these "muslim idiots" as representing islam simply because they share the view of 56 + 1 islamic states/territories (OIC). Not to call OIC islamic is pure nonsense. However, notwithstanding this BBC & other media stubbornly continue their misleading journalism by calling OIC like muslims living outside OIC "no real muslims" or following "a distorted islam"!
Your ignorance abt islam hinders you from recognizing the evil totalitarian logic behind islam that is still the same as it was when the caravan robberer Mohammed started it. Instead of being a faith for morality & goodness islam applies to our lowest & most disgusting instincts, such as (infidel)racism & (Sharia)sexism.
Cure your bottomless & truly frightening ignorance abt islam!
Origin of islam
For you who don't know the disgusting islamofascist nature of the islamic OIC organization that has taken over the UN. OIC was initiated by Saudi Arabia which refused to accept UN's Human Rights Declaration of 1948. OIC has agreed to follow Kora/Sharia
Adama Dieng: OIC's Cairo Declaration (Sharia) deliberately restricts fundamental freedoms and rights -- most notably, freedom of conscience. It was introduced in the name of "defense of human rights", but proposes unacceptable discrimination against non-Muslims and women, while legitimating heinous practices, e.g. Shari'a-compliant punishments (from corporal punishments, to mutilation, and stoning), which attack the integrity and dignity of the human being."
Klevius additional criticism: As a 1400 yrs ongoing crime against humanity islam deservs idictment, not respect. Only when the victims of islamic ideology/parasitism are openly accounted for can you assess the depth of the crime. And only then can you really understand islams evil basic tenets. Moreover, islam is all abt evil sex segregation because this is its key to reproduction. So far only Klevius has addressed this the most important of questions. Don't you still get it? Look at the OIC map above!
The trial abt Geert Wilder's right to defend Human Rights against an ideology that strives to crush them
Robert Spencer: The very idea of trying someone for offending someone else is absurd – especially when the offended group is known to traffic in the PC multiculturalist coin of wounded feelings, so as to gain the political power that comes from victim status. That the Amsterdam District Court would aid and abet this absurdity and obvious manipulation unmasks the Wilders trial – even before it starts – as what it really is: an attempt by the nation’s political elites to silence one of their most formidable critics. The one who has the power to decide what is an actionable offensive statement or prosecutable incitement has the power to control the discourse – and that’s what the prosecution of Wilders is all about. If offending someone is a crime, can those who find hate speech laws offensive bring suit against their framers?
The action against Wilders is taking place, moreover, against the backdrop of the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference’s ongoing efforts at the United Nations to silence speech that they deem critical of Islam — including “defamation of Islam” that goes under the “pretext” of “freedom of expression, counter terrorism or national security.”
If they succeed in doing this, Europeans and Americans will be rendered mute, and thus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Sharia on the West — in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis, non-Muslims subjugated under Islamic rule, is that they are never critical of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an. Thus this prosecution in Amsterdam not only aids the advance of Sharia in the West, but is itself an element of that advance.
The stakes are so high in the Wilders case also because the OIC has a new, powerful ally as it moves against the freedom of speech. In October the Obama Administration actually co-sponsored an anti-free speech resolution at the United Nations. Approved by the U.N. Human Rights Council, the resolution, cosponsored by the U.S. and Egypt, calls on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”
Echoing Obama’s stated determination to combat “negative stereotyping of Islam” in the United States, the resolution also condemns “negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups.” This is, of course, an oblique reference to accurate reporting about the jihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism — for such reporting, and not actual negative stereotyping or hateful language at all, is always the focus of OIC complaints.
Last year the Secretary General of the OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, issued a warning: “We sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed” regarding free speech about Islam and terrorism. And he reported success: “The official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.”
For the first time, an American President has bowed to the OIC’s demands and taken cognizance of that “responsibility.
Klevius comment: Some examples from the real world for the real morons who still don't get it
1. USA: Rifqa Bary, a 17 yr muslim born apostate girl, who is, by the help of islam influenced US (unconstitutional) authorities, exempted from the US constitution & instead has to follow islamic Sharia law, which heavily restricts her freedom to express her opinion abt her own life. This is as much a violation of Human Rights & the Rights of the Child as it gets!
2. UK: An experienced & well renowned foster career was fired by UK authorities because she didn't prevent a 17 yr old muslim girl from leaving islam, i.e. she was supposed to obey islamic Sharia in UK instead of Human Rights. She didn't in any sense contribute to the girls decision yet was supposed to act in accordance with islamic Sharia law in Britain! No freedom of religion in UK.
Still have a problem understanding islam?!
The Holy Negative Human Rights vs OIC's evil Sharia declaration
To understand the primary rock of Human Rights you neeed to understand the Holy Negative HUman Rights which are (so far) best conceptualized by Klevius. However, not all have read Klevius (as yet) so the ignorance abt this basic & crucial foundation of freedom & democracy is still widespread, not the least because of a massive campaign for the belittling of them.
To understand why islam is inevitably doomed to a humiliating extinction you need to understand how the OIC declaration deliberately "misses" the full Human Rights for girls & women. See e.g. Enlightenment vs islamic darkness.
The real islam can't hardly be the dust blowing in the wind that remains after its "reformative" clash with the rock solid Holy Negative Rights (i.e. what Western civilization is built on). Real islam is OIC & a Sharia that is inevitably racist & the opposite to freedom - especially when it comes to girls/women!
So when the "muslim" baroness calls real muslims "idiots" she is a double evil. She pretends being a muslim for her personal gain, yet her vessel labelled 'islam' is empty. She now spits on those taliban who made her career possible. Without islamic jihadism no baroness. By denying islam yet sponging on its name, she betrays both islam & the Holy Negative Right of the Western Civilization.
Wafa Sultan in A God Who Hates: “No one can be a true Muslim and a true American simultaneously.”
G.K Chesterton: “The Crusader would have been quite justified in suspecting the Muslim even if the Muslim had merely been a new stranger; but as a matter of history he was already an old enemy. The critic of the Crusade talks as if it had sought out some inoffensive tribe or temple in the interior of Tibet, which was never discovered until it was invaded. They seem entirely to forget that long before the Crusaders had dreamed of riding to Jerusalem, the Muslims had almost ridden into Paris.”
David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry in Muslim Mafia: “[This book] is about the threat from Shariah Islam and violent jihad propagated by a criminal class of Muslims known as the Muslim Brotherhood, or the ‘Ikhwan mafia.’ This secretive organization dominates most established Muslim groups and mosques in America while, exploiting, manipulating, and even victimizing law-abiding Muslim Americans.”
Jim O'Neil: I’m afraid there’s going to be collateral damage among innocent Muslims, unless they can get past the idea of “When you live here, you think about yourself, and only about yourself.” That attitude is rapidly going to prove useless as a protection.
As Dr. Emmanuel Tanay writes, “The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and extraneous. History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. ...As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts—the fanatics who threaten our way of life.”
Extraneous and irrelevant. You are naive, or ignorant if you think otherwise—I mean “ignorant” in its dictionary sense, of being uninformed.
The LSM (Lame Stream Media) is not uninformed, they’re simply following the party line. They are silent on the topic of Islamic terrorism, for the same reason that NOW is silent about the injustices perpetrated upon Muslim women.
The usually vociferous “women’s rights” movement have been meek as mice in this regard, because for the moment, the Fascist Islamic theocracies, and the Global Elitists, are aligned in their determination to destroy America. They each have their own plans on what to replace America with—either (1) a global collective, run by the UN, under the direction of a Global Elite, or (2) a global Islamic Caliphate.
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Erdogan: Voting against islam is a crime against humanity! Klevius: That's the very problem with islam!
Turkish PM Recep Erdogan: "The vote against minarets was a sign of an increasing racist and fascist stance in Europe, & an islamophobia that is a crime against humanity.”
Klevius comment: Very true, from an islamic point of view. Just like apostasy from islam. The moral basis for islam is that it's a crime not to be a muslim, hence non-believers are criminals who can be punished by dhimmitude, rape &/or killing, etc.
Islam's original formula
Sunday, December 06, 2009
This is the most probable mastermind to the islamic (cutting the throat after raping her) murder. The murder happened in Perugia notorious for its extremist hate mongering islamic mosque with some 10,000 islamic visitors, among them islamic Al-Qaeda etc terrorists. Perugia has a large African population which is heavily influenced by islamic "infidel" racism. Abdullah committed the islamic rape of the infidel & due decapitation, as he usually does, via some lost African street jihadist (no one knows how many victims Abdullah's & Co racist islamic hate mongering has caused to date = see e.g. the case of Linda in Sweden, for a milder form of this islamic street jihadism made in Saudi Arabia & the Koran).
One may only speculate how much the stupid misinformation of islam has contributed to this horrible crime. Maybe the murder could have been avoided with a little more caution & information & less prejudices...
Klevius sex analysis: The case seems to really highlight the extreme sex tension that is building up between the moral crusts consisting of rigid no-sex (before/outside marriage) & the "as much sex as possible & whenever", continents. Meredith Kerchner became a victim of catholic innocence/naivity & islamic sex racism. Catholicism & islam merged into an evil inquisition against "secular promisquity".
The cast (as interpreted by Klevius today from a point of view that is extremely shallow & superficial, but based on his sex & islam analysis):
Meredith Kerchner, a nice girl who didn't want to have sex with the African boy she was, perhaps, too friendly/naive towards in the beginning.
Rudy Guede, the most probable murderer, a black African man (see how hot that phrase is "a black African") with a record of violence & "a taste for foreign ("white") women". He, most probably committed the crime alone (which doesn't exclude the possibility that the others were somewhere nearby, & under influence as well). However, to convict "a black African" while freeing whites seems to have been too difficult. His finger prints & his DNA connected to the murder.
Amanda Knox, a young American woman confused by sex segregation. Alcohol & drugs are the main paths to sex for women but not for men. She might have messed around (although we don't know how much this is exaggerated) but she was most probably not involved in the murder in any sense (yes, she might have been guilty of not reacting properly to what happened if she was nearby). She is a good footballer with a technique to take on attackers that earned her the name 'Foxy Knoxy' which has nothing to do with sex although media & the court sexed it. In fact, one may assume that what made her, as a girl, interested in football, was a healthy explorative curiosity that, when faced with the stunning sex segregation barrier of our time, made her use sex as a means for contact with the other sex. Drugs make such tricky (read perverse) communication smoother.
A main reason she is convicted is the notorious "monster of Florence" prosecutor, Giuliano Mignini (who used to trash justice in Italy's most costly & fruitless hunt for a sex fixated serial killer - maybe it was because he used the same senseless & biased reasoning as in the Kercher case).
Raffaele Sollecito, attracted by Amanda's heterosexual attraction (see From Klevius without love). Possibly even fell in love with her (as she with him) although the smear campaign against Amanda combined with the risk of being involved distanced him from her.
Islam has for long been the main hate mongerer for Africans despite the cruel fact that it was islam in the first place that crippled Africa through 1400 yrs of slave rading/trading, genocides, rapetivism, colonialism & islamic imperialism.
Arabic islam with it's rigid sex segregation & burqa confinement "chastity" (these same girls/women, however, are Sharia sex slaves within "marriage") has no problem of raping/abusing/assulting/murdering non-muslim infidel "whores". This serves as a tactics against the unbelieveres as well as a formula for spreading islam via sex jihadism. The latter was popular at Mohammed's time as well as now. And contrary to what many believe this kind of muslimhood doesn't need to follow conventional islamic forms. Just look at Nation of Islam (Mr X "president's" ideological background) & the Black Panthers in USA.
Acknowledgement: Someone might try to compromise Klevius by telling you he has a master degree in criminology. However, it will hereby be certified that he hasn't let that disgrace in any sense influence his judgement.
Avoid desinformation & cure your bottomless & truly frightening ignorance abt islam!
Origin of islam
Thursday, December 03, 2009
She had to rely on police escort after this!
How come that Koran, history, the guardians of islam, imams, active muslims etc. ALL share the same “extremist view” as Klevius, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders etc?! Not to mention UK bishop Nazir-Ali with Paki roots who resigned because he criticized islam & the Sharia supporting idiot archbishop Rowan Williams.
True muslims see Koran/islam exactly as Klevius does, only they propose it while he warns for it! So Klevius can well be classified as an islamophobe by true muslims & PC people. However, only PC people, not true muslims, can describe Klevius as an extremist.
PC people, on the other hand, try to float somewhere in between, some as political opportunists, others as stealthy & lying muslims who don’t dare to show islam in its entire evilness (i.e. what true muslims call goodness: infidel racism, rapetivism, apostasy ban etc).
BBC & other PC representatives, only see the “islam” & the “muslims” that fit their distorted extremist view on islam, not shared by ANY true muslim who knows abt islam.
Has there ever been such a bad “religion” that has got such a good press as islam?
Upper class PC muslims & the ignorant "muslim idiots"
Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservative peer and shadow minister for community cohesion (also look at what Klevius said 2007abt her islam lover accomplice CaMORON): "They (muslims believing in the Koran & Mohammed) are idiots who do not represent the majority of British Muslims".
Sayful Islam, spokesman for islam4UK: "We are against everything she stands for. She is not a practising muslim. Clearly by looking at her she does not represent Muslims."
Klevius comment: He might have alluded to her bare head or something similar. However this makes me think abt:
An example of islam's evilness embedded in the Koran
Official (PC) translation of Koran 33:59: "Tell your wives, your daughters, and the wives of the believers that they shall lengthen their garments. Thus, they will be recognized (as righteous women) and avoid being insulted"
A non PC translation: “...draw their Jilbabs around them to be recognized as believers and so that no harm will come to them.”
"Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons: that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested."
or (the latter part)
"this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble"
"that will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed"
Klevius islam analysis: What should be considered isn't how? but why? Klevius answer: Because islam is an utterly racist & sexist "religion" which encourages insult, defamation, harrassment & molestation of "infidels". So how could the islamic jihadists know who's a muslim woman without a dress code that signalled it.
Cure your bottomless ignorance abt islam:
Origin of islam
Klevius is your best informed source for information on evil islam & its supporters
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
peers great Sudan's "president" who is arrested in his absence by the Hague for crimes against humanity in Darfur. Ahmed is the one who killed a person with his car while allegedly playing with his cell & got away with 12 month! Lord Ahmed is also the jihadist who threatened to let loose 10,000 muslim jihadist thugs if Geert Wilders was allowed to visit UK. Warsi is the muslim basoness fighting against some lesser muslims (i.e. those following Koran) because she want's to introduce fundamentalist islam (Sharia etc) in small parts instead of openly & at once. Btw, UK already has Sharia courts!
Varying extremists of "a great religion" with a common in killing people
Mr X “president”: "As we know, these men belonged to Al Qaeda – a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam, one of the world's great religions, to justify the slaughter of innocents."
Klevius correction: Almost equally distorted as you (follow video link at the ende of the post)! Moreover, you also slaughter muslims & others while "justifying" it as a "Cristian" who knows what real (great?) islam is & who the real (great?) muslims are!
Islam/Koran is notorious for its abundance of infidel racism, murdering of infidels etc. However, its bigot supporters use to defend (cover) it by presenting the following evil stupidity in Koran in this fancy (PC) translation:
... whoever slays an innocent, unless it be for murder or for mischief in the land, it is as though he slew entire mankind; and whoever keeps it alive, it is as though he kept entire mankind alive; ... (5:32)
Problem being islam/Koran doesn't say so but:
5:32 من اجل ذلك كتبنا على بني اسرائيل انه من قتل نفسا بغير نفس او فسادفي الارض فكانما قتل الناس جميعا ومن احياها فكانما احيا الناس جميعا ولقد جاءتهم رسلنا بالبينات ثم ان كثيرا منهم بعد ذلك في الارض لمسرفون
i.e.: Min ajli thalika katabna AAala banee isra-eela annahu man qatala nafsan bighayri nafsin aw fasadin fee al-ardi fakaannama qatala alnnasa jameeAAan waman ahyaha fakaannama ahya alnnasa jameeAAan walaqad jaat-hum rusuluna bialbayyinati thumma inna katheeran minhum baAAda thalika fee al-ardi lamusrifoona
Remember, "radical islam" is synonymous with islam, while "islam" in PC jargong is synonymous with ignorance abt islam or deliberate cover up of this true islam.
Also remember that when islam/Koran speaks abt humans, persons, souls etc. infidels aren't included! This is the totalitarian nature of islam. Only after submission to it you count!
Cure your bottomless ignorance abt islam (although there are many islam critics out there NO ONE EXCEPT KLEVIUS HAS, SO FAR, TRULY & INFORMED, ADDRESSED THE MAIN ISSUE NAMELY SEX SEGREGATION in this context.
see video (from 2:30) abt Mr X "president's" truly frightening extremist islam connection
read Origin of islam
Monday, November 30, 2009
As the corner stone of the islamic "faith" hence is a legalized sex segregation it is also in stark opposition to the 1948 Human Rights Declaration & the European Convention, which both defend girls'/women's right not to have their freedom limited because of their sex. The OIC's Cairo (Sharia) declaration clearly states (via Sharia) that females are exempted from certain rights because of their sex related "duties" & "responsibilities" (btw, most of the Sharia law concerns restrictions put on girls/women).
While Millions of muslims throw stones on the infidel "Satan" (you, the Westerner - incl Westernized "muslims") on their "pilgrimage"* to the most intolerant nation in the world, Saudi Arabia, Klevius again offers a history lesson for those deeply misled & ignorant abt islam:
* The islamic hate mongering "pilgrimage" tradition was originally a slave trade journey to the Meccan slave market. Compare Africa's mualim "hero" Mansa Musa who, on a single pilgrimage, brought tens of thousands of African slaves to Mecca.
Minarets have had two main functions throughout history, neither of them which is the calling to "prayer" (islam is essentially abt jihad politics & submission, not abt a personal faith - personal faiths are seldom totalitarian, are they):
1) As a watch tower (this they got from the Romans). Koran doesn't stipulate neither minarets nor mosques, hence lacking any directives for such constructions. There's reason to believe that the first minaret ever was used in Basra (more than 30 yrs after the alleged death of Mohammed - no one knows anything for sure abt this Mohammed who isn't even officially referred to at this time) as a watch tower over Zanj plantation slaves imported from East Africa. In fact, Koran was compiled as a moral defense for a Sharia finance based on slavery parasitism.
2) As a tool for the warning, humiliation & intimidation of infidels, i.e. not a phobia but a very real threat (i.e. islam's most central tenets: infidel racism-Sharia sexism-apostasy ban). Because minarets were used to indicate the presence of islam they initially existed only in predominantly non-Muslim cities. There were no minarets at the alleged "mosque" of Mohammed in Medina nor at the original mosque in Mecca.
Muslims & islam supporters behaving exactly like nazis & nazi collaborators in 1938!
Stephen H. Norwood, professor of history at the University of Oklahoma, is author of "The Third Reich in the Ivory Tower: Complicity and Conflict on American Campuses":
Last week's last-minute cancellation at Princeton and Columbia Universities of a lecture by Arab feminist Nonie Darwish - an author who has strongly denounced Islamic intolerance and jihadism - brings to mind American universities' unwillingness to protect campus free speech rights for opponents of Nazism during the 1930s. Princeton's reason for shutting down the scheduled presentation by Darwish strikingly resembles those given by Queens College's president in April 1938 when he withdrew an invitation to anti-Nazi German Jewish exile Ernst Toller to speak on campus. The parallels between Darwish and Toller are powerful. Both were made pariahs in their homelands and came to the United States seeking freedom. Darwish, who grew up in Gaza and in Egypt, became a staunch critic of radical Islam. She wrote a book titled "Now They Call Me Infidel." Toller called his autobiography, published in the United States in 1934, "I Was a German." The Nazis burned his books and confiscated almost all of his property.
In both cases, these challenges to authority made the speakers too "controversial" to appear on some campuses here. In Darwish's case, after the Princeton invitation was issued and accepted, a campus Muslim student group protested - and the sponsoring student organizations then withdrew their invitation. This was met with the university administration's approval - or at least its silence. The university apparently would rather not have the headache of having to worry about bad headlines. Toller's case followed a similar pattern. In April 1938, after Germany's Jews had suffered years of savage street beatings, expulsion from the professions and university faculties, Toller was to speak at Queens College. The college's president, Paul Klapper, suddenly cancelled the renowned playwright's lecture, citing opposition from faculty members and students. Klapper claimed that Toller was an "ardent propagandist." Translation: His opposition to Nazism was too pronounced.
Klevius comment: Just like Geert Wilders, right!
Avoid desiformation & cure your bottomless & truly frightening ignorance abt islam! Read abt the perverse Origin of islam
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money, no matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad aginst Shia muslims in Yemen). This Saudi Arabia also wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever (it's a worrisome fact that few people seem to understand that islam's deeply immoral & extremely evil slave finance, mass murdering, genocides, imperialism, colonialism, sex slavery & Sharia confinement of females etc constitute the very soul of islam, from Mohammed to now*)! Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for girls/women.
Islam is against the law in two ways: 1) It's got its own "law" Sharia, 2) It opposes all the main tenets that constitute a democracy based on Negative Human Rights(see Origin of islam). This is why a true muslim never can honestly participate in a democratic election or as a democratic representative of democracy! Islam doesn't count "infidels" as humans!
Yes' I know, most "muslims" aren't muslims. So why do they support true islam & true muslims?!
When true islam meets democracy
The muslim victims were in a convoy of vehicles Monday heading to register a candidate to challenge even more muslim islamic Ampatuan in next year's election for governor.
What's happening in the Philippines is an example of what happens when you give islam a finger! Since Arabic islam first started to enslave poor Philippinos (many centuries before any European was around) an evil parasitic islamic slave hierarchy developed. This together with islam's jihad pillar has to be acknowledge before assessing the situation in the Philippinos. The US was very wrong when it didn't completely stop islamic slavery there some 100 yrs ago but instead (wrongly) believed it was better to leave it as it was. They saw some uneducated poor slaves whom they thought would be "better off" where they were!
Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "It will be difficult for authorities to enter Ampatuan territory, let alone arrest a member of the family. Most of the elected politicians are Ampatuans, the police are their people, it's very difficult to get in without having more violence if they do not cooperate".
Klevius comment: Really! I.e. an islamic state & part of the Saudi Caliph's (Mr X "president's" dearest friend) world Umma.
Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "With such kind of an alliance between islamic politicians (she actually wrongly said "warlords") and the national elected government officials, it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms, how they could actually do electoral reforms at the local level since they have a bond of gratitude to these local leaders (she now uses the term "local leaders" instead of "warlords" - presumably the next step would be "local politicians").
Klevius comment: She's right, "it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms" if democracy involves islam! Isn't it simply the other way round, i.e. that islam abuses democracy for reforming democracy to suit islam, i.e. anti-democracy!
Every finger given to islam inevitably leads to its main body. This simple rule explains what should have been totally unexplainable just a decade ago, namely that a European country such as UK now has Islamic Sharia courts! You "muslims" who are on the run from islam, don't go to Britain if you want to avoid Sharia!
The only cure against islam is to get rid of it. Start by facing every muslim you meet with these essential questions abt "infidels", sexist legal segregation etc etc etc etc etc etc!!!!!!
Peter Wagner: "Basically, when Mohamed or Allah have said something contradictory, and there are lots of those, the last command takes precedence over the earlier command and renders the earlier command null and void. Since the books of the Koran are not in chronological order one needs to know which command came last. Much of the "kill the infidel" stuff is the more recent commands.
"Part of the problem with "peaceful Muslims" is that none will repudiate the "kill the infidels" commands of their god and prophet because to do so would make one worse than an infidel with another command by Allah to put the apostate to death. In fact, "Radical Islamists" are nothing more than true believers doing exactly what Mohammed and Allah are telling them to do. The "peaceful Muslims" are actually the unbelievers and the Jihadists are the true believers. Check the 'murtadd'; it also explains why "peaceful Muslims" won't condemn the Jihad at Fort Hood. If you want personal proof, when talking to a Muslim, ask them to condemn and repudiate the grossly hateful and kill-the-infidel stuff in the Koran. You will get some interesting answers."
Whereas true Christians "turn the other cheek, love their enemies, do unto others..." etc. True Muslims kill the infidels. Both are just doing what their god and prophet told them to do.
* yes, all forms of monotheisms(sic) are evil & part of an immoral sex segregation(early Christianity may be seen as an anti-sexual exception, before it was overpowerd by patriarchal sexism). However, as explained in Origin of islam, islam is the latest & most advanced/evil form of this evilness (what made it successful was Mohammed's sex & booty attraction on teenage boys!). Islam took the worst parts of old Judaism & fine tuned it via laws that STILL IN 2009 makes it impossible for a true muslim woman to love a non-muslim whereas a muslim man can fuck whomever & the child can be claimed a muslim (compare Mr X "president"). I never cease to get surprised when I meet decent people who still don't know this simple fact! They seem to daydream that islam can't be that bad, can it? YES' IT CAN!!!
Monday, November 23, 2009
Mr X "president's" beloved Saudi-islamic hate mongerer strikes again: some 60 murdered in islamic terror on the Philippines while PC media is silent!
This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money. No matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad).
This is what media should have written if they really wanted to inform those ignorant/misled abt islam (they certainly possessed the info but didn't want you to know!):
Some 50 people ambushed, murdered, decapitated & thrown into mass graves by islamic murderers resting on what is written in the Koran, & sponsored & agitated by that very same Saudi Arabia that is the "guardian of islam" & which is now busy killing Shia muslims in Yemen! Also, this Saudi Arabia wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever. Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for women.
Islamic Abu Sayyaf (in Arabic 'bearer of the muslim sword') in the Philippines has become noted for its ambushes of government forces, kidnappings, piracy, & the beheading of captives. The U.S. Department of Treasury in 2007 named three of their Saudi supporters: Abdul Rahim Al-Talhi, Muhammad Abdallah Salih Sughayr and Fahd Muhammad Abd Al-Aziz Al-Khashiban. According to Levey, no one identified by the US or UN as a terrorist financier has been prosecuted by the Saudi authorities.
Klevius history lesson: First of all, start by curing your bottomless ignorance abt islam (e.g. Origin of islam). Islam was in its beginning as well as now a parasitic slavery ideology capable of producing nothing except suffering & more muslims in a system of institutionalized rapetivism (Sharia).
Whatever islamic historical stone you turn around you always gonna see decay masked in a slave or oil finance.
SE Asia was islamized in exactly the same way as was Africa, namely via slave rading/trading. An Arabic network of slave rading/trading was established by the help of local chiefs while selling/using the poor in slavery. In the process the wealthy ones became even more wealyhy & powerful while they adopted islam. Also due to inter-marriage & islam's inborn dead end Sharia structure (which means every pregnancy led to more muslims or muslim slaves while none the other way round according to islamic law). Whereas both Christian & islamic praxis may have widely varied in different times & settings, islam only has an unaltered moral basis that stands firm on a moral resting on infidel racism/Sharia rapetivism/apostasy ban! Against this background it's equally pathetique & tragical that, on the one hand, these young muslim terrorists deeply aware of islam's teachings, think they're (like Pol Pot's etc willing young murderers) murdering for a good heavenly cause, &, on the other hand, those youngsters who are misinformed to believe islam is "a religion of peace" & "egalitarianism" (your only real key out of this dilemma is by understanding Negative Human Rights. And when it comes to "egalitarianism" you may remember that life is per definition not egalitarian, only death is egalitarian. This is also the main shortcoming of monotheist "godisms" (see Klevius definition of religion) However, a global system based on the elimination of taxation of work, & instead progressive taxation on luxury or "bad" consumption, combined with positive human rights such as basic education, health care etc).
It's because of islam's parasitism you can't buy any decent product made in Saudi Arabia!
What many a young jihadist doesn't seem to understand is islam's inherent evilness in the form of its infidel racism & sexist treatment of women as sex slaves. Or maybe they are...
However, they do behave like Pol Pot, don't they. And why should they be more educated than the Western morons who supported Khmer Rouge?
Btw, there was no "golden age" of islam in Spain, only a disgusting islamic slave finance. Also, there was no good (like BBC use to present it) islamic Ottoman rule. On the contrary the Ottomanian slave "empire" inevitably deteriorated until the abolishment of slavery & Western force together with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secularization paved the way for the Turkish progress that is now again on the verge of slipping into even more islamic barbary. Let's see if the new EU president remembers what he said abt islamic Turkey as not a possible part of Europe.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
THE REAL MASTERMIND OF 9/11 & HIS PUPPET MR X "PRESIDENT"
You can see Mr X "president's" close islamic advisors at his ears. In the middle you have CAiR (Council of American islamic Relations, founded by bin Laden's close friend & ally) rewarding Hasan (founder of the "moderate" "inter-faith" islamic Bridget TV, supposed to deliver a better - i.e. false - picture of islam in the US) who then, in a purely Koranic/islamic style, decapitated his divorcing wife after having stabbed her some nine times.
Klevius Law School, extracted from Demand for Resources (1992:43-44): The only strictly scientific discipline, jurisprudence (narrowly defined), is characterized by an absolute truth, i.e. the intention of the legislator expressed (& blurred) in text form. A reality (or a game, if you like) that’s construed by the participants/players themselves. A possible violation is spotted by ticking off on a list of crimes (the law) in a test bench we call the judicial process. This is an experiment in which a ”case” is evaluated against the text in the law, which also regulates the judicial process itself. However, if it’s difficult or impossible to evaluate an alleged crime, this may be due to incomplete data or clumsiness in the process. Moreover, it’s also possible that complete/good enough evaluation cannot be reached due to special characteristics of a particular case. If this is the case then the defendant is acquitted (no matter how clear it is he did the deed) & may even be entitled to compensation for a “false allegation” (& maybe even a green card). A failed prosecution only needs to be judicially “false”, not false in the realm outside the judicial process. A court can never disprove an accusation , only fail to judicially prove it. An "appropriate decorum" wouldn't change this basic fact, but rather contribute to a picture of the US Justitia shooting herself in the foot.
A peculiar first consequence of the above is that the defendant has an absolute right to a fair trial, which includes the right to be treated as not guilty (although suspect) until the verdict. Intervening in this right of the suspect/defendant by someone involved in the judicial process may constitute a violation of the said process.
Mr X “president’s” babbling abt the 9/11 case may well constitute a tampering with the jurisdiction of the courts for the purpose of influencing a decision, thus violating judicial independence. A civilian trial for the 9/11 terrorists may harm the US (& world) security, place government officials and civilians at risk, and provide an islamic propaganda platform not unlike 9/11 itself. Remember how the islamic murdering of some 3000 people became used as a “liberation” flag for islam supporters!
Attorney General Eric Holder isn’t directly elected by the American people but indirectly by the illegitimate Mr X “president”, whose schizopheric decision to hold military tribunals for other detainees at the Guantanamo Bay prison, including Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri (who planned the 2000 USS Cole bombing) while exempting the Islamic terrorists of 9/11, reflects the urge to de-militarize (& hence to make political) the war on islamic terror. Btw, what's the difference of bombing Cole or Pentagon?
Some examples of Mr X "president" & his Attorney General's babbling
Attorney General Eric Holder: "The defendants could have been tried in either military or civilian court, because the 9/11 attacks were both an act of war and a violation of our federal criminal law. But at the end of the day, it was clear to me that the venue in which we are most likely to obtain justice for the American people is in federal court."
"Failure is not an option (Klevius comment: Well, it is! It's the very foundation of Western justice just as falsification is the basis for Western science). These are cases that have to be won. I don't expect that we will have a contrary result."
According to Mr X "president" himself those offended by the legal privileges given to Mohammed by virtue of getting a civilian trial rather than a military tribunal won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him".
He then partly realized his own stupidity & quickly added that he did not mean to prejudging the outcome of the trial. "I'm not going to be in that courtroom. That's the job of the prosecutors, the judge and the jury."
Klevius comment: The main difference between military & civil cases is that the former threaten the nation (even if it's just a trifling matter of discipline) whereas the latter only try to "order" a society's relations with its individuals. A failure to do so doesn't necessarily threaten the society which can adapt (man made legislation) because it's not equally limited to a specified purpose.
Monday, November 16, 2009
BBC & other overpaid "executives'" IQ deficiency, islam's racist/sexist Caliph (& his puppet), the Angels of Antichrist & Klevius' islamophobic harem
Gal Luft: The murdering of 13 U.S. soldiers in Fort Hood by Nidal Malik Hasan is one in a string of events involving muslim soldiers and veterans. According to General Norman Schwarzkopf’s aide, Rick Francona, Saudi officers appeared to have been directed by their senior military or religious leadership (i.e. Abdullah & Co, i.e. Mr X "president's" first call - Klevius comment) to spot and assess potential converts to islam among American military members. Once targeted, Saudi military officers, incl. an imam, would attempt to meet the American outside of the work area. These approaches included generous gifts & literature abt islam. Americans who decided to convert to Islam were rewarded by an all expenses paid trips to Mecca, & payments as high as $30,000. The commander of Saudi forces in the Gulf, Prince Khaled bin Sultan, bragged in his memoir that more than 2,000 American troops converted to islam through this campaign. “These muslim troops are now the messengers of islam in the U.S. forces” said Dr. Abu Ameena Bilal Phillips, a Jamaican-born convert to islam, who worked under the auspices of the U.S. Air Force while converting U.S. troops to Islam. After the war, Phillips moved to the United States to “set up Islamic chapters in the U.S. Defense Department.”
Note: ‘Evil’ is here conceptualized as something that a majority of people would normally consider evil (if released from a confusing/blurring & anti human rights ‘faith’ propaganda).
Islam’s evil original formula: An evil racist "infidel" moral that opens up for slave rading/trading/trafficking & the subjugation of girls/women under the sex terror (rapetivism) of Sharia in the dead end of apostasy ban.
The overpaid (usually paid by taxpayer's - 50 of BBC's executives earn more than the PM!) "executives" behind political correctness (PC)
"White" children, forcibly shipped to Australia, whose children now are the target for often brutal PC racism (tooling islam), is just but one example revealing the dangerous, unethical & deeply immoral racist segregation of people based on their skin nuances. The whole PC movement (which, as a byproduct, unfortunately bolsters evil islam) rests on the false allegation/self guilt (you name it) that white people have statistically been more technologically/economically successful (because industrial technology happened to start in Europe) & that this has something to do with colonialism (this view is not only rudely unfair against less fortunate "white" - and "black" - individuals/people but also excepts all wealthy "black" Europeans. In fact, there’s really nothing to prove that European colonialism, on the whole, didn’t benefit those people, sometimes even hugely, compared to islam’s purely parasitic imperialism/colonialism based on slavery in its three main modes: sex slavery/household slavery, plantation slavery, & "soldier"/jihadist slavery. It was islam's blood-sucking that delayed Africa's & other's progress.
In this context it’s also important to note the extreme intellectual desperation/fraud hiding in efforts to prove islamic slavery more "benign" than others. Slavery has always “leaked” between the classes just like in the society as a whole. Only in the case of islam it's popular to pick the cherries. When the overwhelming amount of islam's historical & contemporary atrocities becomes non-escapable the only refuge is to make evil good, isn't it!
Those "white" overpaid "executives" (in media & politics) are today's ruling class, i.e. belong to that very same strata they use to spit on historically (often incl. the "bourgeoisie"). And precisely because their hypocrisy is so obvious they desperately have to defend themselves by pretending not to be racist although they are almost as racist & sexist as those islamists they support. In this process they even boost their own racism & simultaneously commit a double sin against those in a weaker position in society!
Angels of Antichrist, Homo Filius Nullius & sex segregation
In possibly the most important sociological paper in the 20th century, it is argued that the socialist individualisation/collectivisation (the social state) of humans has resulted in a dehumanization that is best visible in the state's (often horrible) praxis with children. The "BBC executives & Co" mafia belongs to this unfortunate outcome of Enlightenment. These are also the guys who now (again) betray us with a fascism that is more deceptive than ever.
Klevius comment: When I was a young boy I used to read Holocaust documentaries mainly because I couldn't for my life understand how Germans, who looked & behaved exactly like people around me, could have committed such atrocities. What really scared me was that no one gave me the slightest clue to having solved the problem of the popularity of fascism. It was only after 9/11 & the emerging PC movement I really started understanding how the social mechanisms behind fascism work & what motivates them.
Of course, nothing will change before the true adaptation of Negative Human Rights as they were initially intended. Such a move would legally wipe out fascism & islam in one strike! And of course, we'd face new problems. However, what counts is what we're facing now.
And no, there's no risk for more persecution of muslims than there's for muslim persecution of non-muslims. Quite the contrary. Propaganda news exaggerate whatever happens to "vulnerable muslim minorities" while covering up muslim atrocities, racism, sexism etc against the invisible group of non-muslims, although we're talking abt a one Billion plus islamic majority Umma/O.I.C., & although the real minorities are the non-muslim & muslim individuals who suffer under this fascist elephant in the porcelain shop.
The older part of tendentious & hugely overpaid (are they even doing anything or are they contra productive?) the notorious "BBC executives" belong to the generation that sexually exploited vulnerable girls under the false mantra of "sexual liberation for women". Remember, that back then the position of girl's was even more vulnerable than today. They were just released from their homes while still carrying the old sexual moral heavily on their shoulders. And when they heard/saw the boy bands playing on Cavern they screemed out their sex segregation while the boys were rewarded by sex (some 50 bands or so used to play in one night).
This "sexual liberation" had happened before, in the Victorian/Edwardian era. However, when we look at what happened in Japan a century ago we'll find that the slogan was quite the opposite namely "freedom from sex" (no, Klevius isn't proposing any certain attitude abt sex, only to get rid of rapetivism, i.e. institutionalized or individual sexual pressure & due sex segregation, self rape, rape etc)!
One may summarize the overpaid smuggish "executive" Beatles generation (& many of their kids) as going from free sex to the hermetically closed islamic burqa (Sharia) & its unfree content which is excluded from whatever sex or love except for the duty to satisfy her husband whenever he feels for it!
The medieval islamic conquerers brought no women with them, only their swords.
Today the same is repeated. Most are young muslim men who are supposed to take non-muslim wives, whereas muslim immigrant women (except for Ayaan Hirsi Ali & Co) are tied with/to islam via Sharia & aren't allowed to fall in love with non-muslims.
Yes, most islamic slavery through 1400 yrs have been "peaceful", i.e. just kidnapping or cheaply buying slaves from criminal locals.
When women & children of Mali suffer even starvation on top of everything else because of islam (i.e. no food but a huge over production of kids while the muslim men are loitering around thanks to UK welfare) it's almost parodical when BBC, the knight of islam, cries abt it, isn't it.
Islam is always one way - the dead end!
Cure your ignorance:
Origin of islam
The islamic origin of Vikings
Friday, November 13, 2009
To understand the pics see Origin of islam
Also consider The Jewish/islamic Origin of the Vikings
A modern Arab woman on Arab men - a wormhole to the islamic myth abt pre-islamic Arabia
Hajar Benlahmar (slightly edited by Klevius): If i have to choose between marrying an Arab and non Arab, I'd pick the non Arab even though I’m an Arab, for one simple reason, I can't bear the mentality of Arabic men, which is dogmatic, racist, sexist - just name it (Klevius: Islam?). An Arabic man cant accept a woman as partner in life, he wants her to be under his control (Klevius: Sharia?) following his wills and denying her existence. Most Arabic men are not looking for a wife to share life with, but they are looking for a domestic servant.
Klevius comment: "A domestic servant" whose services include sex & the reproduction of dogmatic, racist, sexist boys & submissive girls.
You've heard it many times. The evil pre-islamic society was improved by Mohammed & islam. However, the opposite holds true. Because of a scandalous ignorance abt pre-islamic Arabia, sanctioned by islam (includes ibn-Khaldun & others), islamic vulgo caricatures of the pre-islamic Arabs are taken as facts by stupid "islamologs" & others even today.
The non-islamic world is at war with islam
Islam has, from scratch, been an attacking jihadist "faith", & if you are under attack & defend yourself it's called war, isn't it! Most of islam's basic tenets are opposite those of U.S. & the free democratic world. In fact, there's an enourmous & desperate effort to "reformulate"/"reinterpret" islam/Koran while simultaneously belittling the products of Enlightenment (which, btw, was caused by an attacking islam). Islam started & built its tenets as a parasitic slave finance combined with sex slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia & apostasy ban & sealed with monotheism. That's why sex jihadism made it initially so successful, that's why O.I.C. (Organization of Islamic Countries) have their own "human rights" (Cairo declaration, which denies girls/women freedom under the cover of "responsibilities & "dignity" etc) & now wants to (via UN) criminalize criticism of islam.