Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
Sweden supports Islamic bio-terror! The "Western whore", the Islamist-Arabic self-centered, oil-fueled, totalitarian pimp & the root of evil
Already four years ago Karolinska Institutet (KI) in Stockholm and the Swedish governemnt knew that Iran develops WMD in the Pasteur Institute. Despite this Sweden continues its cooperation with the Iranian Islamists in the field of viruses used for bio-terror. To understand this read the previous posting for a start! Also note that Sweden (KI) is the EU-center for contagious diseases (European Union Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - ECDC)! It may also be noted that Fidel Castro has contributed A SIGNIFICANT ITEM ON BIOTERROR FOR IRAN and that Swedish members in the EU parliament have felt sympathy for Fidel Castro’s regime throughout the years.
The evilness of Islam is purest by its Arabic wells - the oil-for-Islam exchanging Saudi sheik families - but most visible among the poor and the weird!
Arabic evil in Bosnia and elsewhere: Wahhabism -- the Cancer/Syphilis of Islam
"Arab militias, known as the Janjaweed, in a campaign of rape and widespread killing against the ethnic Africans"
Klevius comment: Where's the border between evil and "good" Islam? Nowhere that I know about. And Cancer is a "totalitarian" disease that can only be cured by eliminating all cancer cells/metastasises (there are no "good" cancer cells/metastasises to my knowledge - see Definition of Religion and Fundamentalist Test). Disconnect pan-Arabic Islam from the rest of the world so the Islamic Saudis could clean it up themselves at home or continue living in its shadow if that's what they really want! And non-Muslim Arabs are welcome as refugees to the rest of the world, aren't they (and even "Muslims" if they keep their "religion" as a non-political private matter just for themselves)? The fundamentalists are right in one sense, there's no other Islam than theirs, and that's precisely why it's doomed - and the wanna-be's "Islam" obviously then doesn't have any need for racist/sexist pan-Arabism and the Arabic sources and wells.
Amnesty: The Janjawid are now supported and funded by the government; they wear uniform and continue to attack, kill, rape and abduct civilians. About a million people have fled from their burnt villages and have taken refuge in towns in Darfur, while more than 120,000 have crossed the border into Chad
The Western whore takes the bait of the Arabic oil-pimp?
The sexist Islamo-totalitarian evil (=Wahhabism, the real root of Islam) Arabic sheik-billionaires smile while naive Westerners swallow their money-baits (from Hollywood to universities, mosques and youth etc organizations). The effect of this oil-for-Islam, sex segregated world-capitalism is already very visible, e.g. in the boosting of the Arabic (Islamic) language and culture. Narrow-minded leftists/feminists etc eagerly forget about the rest of the (non-Muslim) world. This is actually quite similar a process as the fascist women movement in the 1930s!
A Western Catch 22: Fundamentalist sex segregated Islam funded by Arabs or slightly less fundamentalist sex segregated Islam funded by the Westerners own tax
Westerners shouldn't fall in the trap of giving money to Muslim organizations just to prevent the fascist Arabic influence. Instead they should stop the fascist Arab money before the damage made has become even worse!
Modernity can't be stopped by Middle Age perspectives - it only prolongs the suffering in the process towards a global community based on The Holy 1948 UN Declaration on the (negative) Human Rights.
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Swedish Islamist Leif "Abd al Haqq" Karlsson, naive (or hypocrite & traitor?) top imam denies women a social life outside home
Definition of sex segregation (and feminism).
Acknowledgement for the reader: Islam/Muslims shouldn't be confused with immigration/immigrants! And Muslim (see Definition of religion) immigrants should first pass the Fundamentalist test before accepting themselves or being accepted as democratic participants respecting the holy 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration in a democratic society!
Logic that excludes Islamic racism/sexism: From Klevius without love: Sex, kinship and friendship (non-sex marriage, the Vagina gate and the atom of kinship).
Sweden is one of the worst hit countries in Europe of Muslim immigration and Political Correctness.
Abd al Haqq Kielan, as Leif Karlsson now prefers to call himself, is the ultimate example of a naive and confused Westerner who has fallen in the Islamic trap he has himself assisted to dig with the help of his own projections on what he thinks is Islam.
Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan also says he doesn't believe in political Islam (i e the only Islam that is now relevant) but that he is a little bit surprised (sic) about the many young political Islamists in the mosques!
also see: "Unveiled women beg for rapes" Forum mot Islamisering (Forum against Islamization)!
Klevius comment: Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan is in person the ultimate proof for Klevius statement that the Swedes are the world's most lost people (according to the World Values Survey and hence also most vulnerable for political, sexist, pan-Arab(ic) Islam. Did Leif crash his head against the uncertainty/dynamics of ultimate modernity, and then bounced back to the darkest corner of the Middle Ages (also see e.g. Slavery and the Infidel in Islam for a start)?
Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan's statement that women shouldn't be allowed a social life outside home, clearly reveals a complete misinterpretation of the world of today. In fact, (see e g What is sex segregation?) the future of Islam is Muslim feminism (i e very much outside the home but still heavily sex segregated).
Behind the timid looking Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan's back Islamic racism and sexism keeps growing. One of his co-traitors (feminism and Islam both share the same bases of rigid sex segregation), head of the Domestic Violence Unit at the Malmö Police, Anna Gustafsson, claims that we are dealing with a “technical” increase, not a real one. However, national statistics reveal that reported rapes against children have almost doubled in Sweden during the past ten years. The number of rape charges per capita in Malmö is 5 – 6 times that of Copenhagen,
Poor Leif, I'm sorry to say that you might have been betrayed and abused as a tool for political Islam, and that you probably don't even have the courage to escape your betrayers and your own private illusions.
Where is the Kierkegaard of today, capable of desarming a political world "religion" with totalitarian and racist ("infidels") sexist ambitions? "For Kierkegaard, the true meaning of Christianity is the individual standing alone before and in the presence of a transcendent God"
If you have even the remotest belief that Islam could be democratic start with Klevius' definition of religion and The holy 1948 Declaration on Universal Human (negative) Rights. If you are puzzled with the "holy" see posting below Thursday, May 12, 2005!
If, on the other hand, Leif Karlsson isn't naive one may be forced to consider the possibility that he is a traitor:
"The doctrine of Jihad and Jizya essentially means building the Islamic Empire by denying infidels all rights except the right to serve their Muslim masters. The secret of Islam’s survival and longevity lies in both the deceptive cloak it wears in the form of a religion, and in the fact that economic weakness is always inherited by states based on its tenants. Up until the age of oil this has made Islamic countries appear relatively unthreatening"
Although we use to reject undemocratic and fascist movements and parties, the worst of them all, Islam, is by many allowed to continue to sponge on human rights and democracy. Why?
When asked why he converted to Islam Leif Karlsson refers to his trip to Morocco in the 70s, and how "nice it was" and the "small streets and the crowd of people" etc. If Leif Karlsson had been less naive and had read more facts rather than the Koran he'd be more familiar with the reality of Islam (e.g. Edmondo de Amicis' - a basically Islam friendly author - revealing 19th century trip to Morocco or Today's reality of Arab/Islamic slave trading in North-Africa!
Oil-for-Islam in Sweden?
Christer Nilsson, minister and deputy head of mission at the Swedish Embassy: “We want to let Saudis know that Sweden is a friendly country, where processing a visa application would not take more than ten days,” Nilsson said, adding that endorsement of Schengen visa by any of the member countries entitles a tourist to visit them without any hassle."
The naive and impossible idea of non-Muslims living together with Muslims is like the impossibility for a non-Muslim/Muslim marriage to be successful (without the non-Muslim converting to Islam):
"And do not marry Al-Mushrikaat (idolatresses) till they believe (worship Allaah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress), even though she pleases you” “And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al‑Mushrikoon till they believe (in Allaah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater)
So, the only way to go is, in the global end, non-Muslim. Why? Because of the rigidity (totalitarian racism and sexism) inherited in Islam itself:
"We (Muslims) Will Rule America; Israel is a Cancer; Jews are a Virus Resembling AIDS; Muslims Will Finish Them Off".
Klevius* comment: What about us non-Jews, non-Christians, non-Muslims, non-Communists and non-Feminists? Sorry, I forgot - we don't even count as humans.
Sucking money from the state(s) is so much easier if you belong to, say, an Islamic(ist) organization. Islam, the "religion" that has created little except violence, slavery, exploitation, senseless powerty, and colorful mosques built by innocent blood, has now become more powerful just because it happens to sit on the top of an oil-well, which it was unable to even open without the help of the "infidels"!
Islam, a shaky and hence hypersensitive totalitarian "poligion" protected by oil, "white collars" and socially lost lunatic jihadists
An "Arab" racist ethnicity and an "Arabic" language, which is in fact a very late branch of Hebrew and Aramaic - the language of Jesus. In fact it seems that the necessary full written Arabic wasn't even around at the time of Koran, which is basically a Syro-Aramaic liturgical Christian scripture that was "spiced" with "Arabism", i.e. the tools/rules necessary for conquest and exploitation. (Note! You "Arabs" who aren't Muslims, have all my respect. And you who pretend you are a Muslim, stop it and fight for your self respect and a FREE world - most of the world will support you!)! Because I'm almost convinced that "Arabs", behind their Islamic intellectual and sexist/racist yoke, have the same capabilities as other people, abandoning Islam would most probably finally open up for real productivity in "Arab" countries. I look forward to buy the first high quality tech product really Made in Arabia by Arabs (it doesn't need to be even close to the almost unreachable Made in Japan top level Shinto technology, though).
Islamic desecration of The Holy and Universal 1948 (negative) Human Rights Declaration
Pre-Islam "Arabs" used to reveal an overwhelming immorality, and were robbing trading caravans, and sold the stolen goods at dumped prices on the market, hence destroying every effort for a decent commerce. But Islam was not the moral correction needed (as many seem to belief), but on the contrary its ultimate perfection to become a tool for conquest, robbery and exploitation on a global (and most often "white collar") scale.
If Islamic "Arabs" really want to be accepted as global citizens they have to entirely abandon Islam and everything it stands for! On the wealthy sheik level as well as on the lunatic jihadist level! Such a move (which is inevitable and already in progress albeit too slowly for the sake of the victims of Islam) will also open up for the REAL emancipation for those women who have been affected in one way or another by this heritage from the Middle Age desert robberers.
After 9/11: Hugo Chavez (Venezuela) financed Al Qaeda with some $1M donation because he was so impressed and happy by the deed!
How much do Islamic "Arabs" in the West gain of the support Islamic organizations (legal and illegal) suck from Western states compared to non-Islamic immigrants (who might even be refugees from Islamic genocide and other atrocities)?!
It was perfectly understandable to create, and then to present to those conquered, a belief-system that would incorporate bits and pieces of Christianity and Judaism, and yet be a supersessional and supremacist ideology (with "Arabs" and the Arabic language always supreme) that would appeal, because of those elements of the prior montheisms, to those very Christians and Jews (or, later, the Zoroastrians of Persia). Muhammad is depicted above all as an Arab tribal leader, a warrior, striking temporary truces, ordering political assassinations, doing whatever he had to do to increase his own worldly power. Islam is not an other-worldly belief system.
Basically Islam now constitutes the major desecration of the holy 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration! Why isn't it, as a totalitarian/fascist movement officially prosecuted! It can't be hidden/protected behind filtered "good" interpretations when the Islamic reality in Sudan and elsewhere around the globe clearly shows evilness!
The Swedish fascist* state propaganda media deliberately misleads listeners by naming suicide bombers "car bombs" (other media usually talk about "suicide car bombers")hence trying to hide the horrible fact that youth/children are unscrupulously brainwashed and cheated in Islamic Koran schools, to give their and their victimes blood for a fascist and totalitarian cause!
* Remember that Sweden has been a one-party state for approximately the same time as the USSR. And whereas the Sovjet has fallen, Sweden is now possibly the heart of the world's neo-fascism (Islamic), not the least bcause it is able to hide its real face behind the widespread myth of the welfare Sweden (see Angels of Antichrist" and "In democratic countries this takes place when competing propagandists resolve their differences and agree upon one propaganda. This maneuver can be seen in amalgamations or agreements within political, economic, educational, and religious groups."
While girls and women are systematically raped and killed together with the males in Sudan, Swedish fascist Islam supporting state media closes its eye against news like: the Arab militiamen appeared "happy when they raped. They sing when they rape and tell us we are just slaves and they can do whatever they wish."
The fascist Swedish state media has a similar attitude when Swedish girls/children/women are raped/abused by Islamic gangs in Sweden.
Sweden has appointed a Sharia Islam supporter (Masoud Kamali) as the government's "expert" for how to strenghten Islam in Sweden!
According to Mr. Kamali, Muslim families should be excluded from scrutiny in cases of suspected child or woman abuse, because they have a different "tradition" and shouldn't be forced to follow Swedish customs.
The African heroine Ayan Hirsi Ali ("the left is exactly like the Muslims - Islamic abuse of immigrant women isn't a priority") now seems to be the first real crack in the fascist movement consisting of sex segregated sharia Islam and Western leftists and feminists. Klevius site on sex segregation and negative human rights is so far the only one addressing the underlying and ultimate problem, i.e. sex segregation and the social state (already profiled 1996 in Angels of Antichrist). I'm sure Hanna Arendt should have loved it.
So what's good about Sweden anyway?
Monday, May 23, 2005
The veil signs a sexist system of belief (totalitarian Islam/Sharia) according to which women should be segregated from men. In doing this it also implies that men and women aren't able to cope with eachother. In conclusion it might be fair to say that the very essence of the veil lies in this sexist assumption, which is something completely different than a woman who, because of some other reasoning, is perhaps even more covered with clothes.
Thursday, May 19, 2005
The Swedish girl/woman problem: Rapes, violence, contempt, fear and 71 % income compared to men. Head of Swedish state feminist org: "Men are animals"
Example 1: When the Swedish Prime minister and his main political opponent in upcoming election were planning a debate on Swedish state TV they asked for a female reporter to avoid an all-male setting. They were denied without any particular motive, obviously because of a lack of a suitable female person.
Example 2: Sweden scores among the worst nations when it comes to rapes and violence against girls/women and according to a poll published today in Aftonbladet 85 % of Swedish women fear to go out.
Example 3: Swedish girls have such a low self esteem and are so self-destructive that the Swedish state felt obliged to launch a "Girl-project" to deal with it. This move had nothing to do with "a relentless pursuit for perfection" in a state that is often considered a good example of gender equality, but quite the contrary a desperate response to a flood of reports indicating that some 40 % of Swedish girls have really serious socio-psychological (and even physical) problems related to their bad situation. Compare this to Klevius (1996): "Agneta Pleijel complained, already in her 'letter' (1993) to Selma Lagerlöf (The world's first female Nobel prize winner in literature) about the apparent weakness in Swedish girls’ self-esteem despite the high degree of female workers and femininity in day caring, pre-schools and preliminary schools"
Example 4: 15 % of young Swedish women suffer from vulvodynia (vestibulitis) caused by having intercourse without really wanting to (see What is sex segregation?)
Example 5: According to the president of the Swedish state's official feminist organization ROKS, men are animals and walking dillos" and when the surprised female interviewer asked once again if that was really what she meant, she repeated it and added "Don't you think so?"!
Example 6: Sweden prides itself with a law that makes the buying (but not selling) of sexual services illegal. Usually those who have been convicted have lost their jobs. A military officer lost his military as well as his civil job. But when a judge (Leif Thorsson) in the Swedish Supreme Court was sentenced for exactly the same type of crime nothing happened except that he had to pay a fine!
Klevius comment: All of this is a result of a really heavy (and partly a secondary effect of the world's most elaborated social state) sex segregation that then continues in other, and more disguised, forms in adult women. So for example are most of the Swedish women employed by the state in traditional or recently created "feminine" occupations. Sweden lags far behind most of OECD when it comes to women's technical etc performances.
So when you see reports where Swedish women score high, give it a second thought. Who planned/wrote it, and why? So for example is the structure of UN reports often heavily influenced by Swedish feminists. Others are profiled by similar countries in EU (+ Canada etc) for plain political reasons.
For an overview of the state of the Swedish state see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship + links.
Sweden as the haven for sex segregated Islamists see below!
Thursday, May 12, 2005
Oil-for-Islam? The holy sex segregated Arabic Islam vs the perhaps even more holy 1948 Human Rights declaration! Totalitarian Islam creeping in Asia.
Islamism Grows Stronger at the United Nations
Which scripture is more holy? The Koran, which considers part of humanity in terms of non-human "infidels" and "unbelievers", or the Universal Declaration of (negative) Human Rights, which considers all humans as humans and as equals, no matter of sex, religion/lack of religion, race etc.
Islam isn't actually even a religion. Insted it's forceful and greedy fascist (totalitarian) politics veiled in relgious retorics. Although some countries with Islam as the declared state religion have constitutional provisions protecting religious freedom that may, theoretically, compare favorably to international standards, Islamic praxis has clearly, and progressively, revealed its limitations. Misled and confused and/or brainwashed "Koran youngsters" and even children, are used to enforce violent and fascist Islam. Simultaneously a "soft" spreading of totalitarian Sharia Islam among disorganized and vulnerable Western youth (fuelled by oil/drugs etc money) is performed through mosques, Imams, youth and other Islamic/Muslim organizations etc aided by democratic tax payers and those very Human Rights and anti-discriminatory laws that Islam itself denies others when in power (compare "religious police" and other stupidities unheard of since long in the West).
Klevius comment: It's the very blend of expansionist pan-Arabism (i e Islam), abundance of oil and drug money, abuse of poor people's situation (which in many parts of the world often may have been originally caused/contributed by that very same Islam, see e g The Forgotten Holocaust), educated but detached and sex segregated youth, and the abuse of democracy, affirmative actions and human rights, which are the secrets behind Islam's rapid spreading - not its message, whatever it might be (should we ask bin Ladin or Western naive or smart Islam scholars for the "proper" interpretation?!).
Oil money now feeds racist/sexist, Islamic movements in the US: "Blacks" against "whites" or "blacks and browns" against "whites" or even "colored" against "whites"! And media and some politiicians seem well lubricated to avoid mixing the t-word with the "proper and nice" Islam (which of course only exists in the minds of those naive Westerners who haven't realized that Islam, unlike e.g. Christianity, gets all its power from its basically racist/sexist - sometimes under cover, sometimes openly - message appealing to troubled individuals):
Ironically, while here at home Arab and Islamic lobbies are pressuring editors not to relate terrorism to Islam, a growing number of Arab journalists and intellectuals, far from shying away from the use of the T-word in connection with Islam, go as far as explaining Islamic terrorism as a result of Islamic culture’s failures in the modern age
"For the sake of Islam itself its true teachings should not be so clearly expressed"
Sex segregation and feminism meet in Islam
"A problem with Majab’s argument is that she never asks herself if any theoretically feminist reinterpretation of Islam is possible. Another problem is that both Islamic feminists and atheists feminist have only an ideological approach to religion. One argues that without believing in religion, women’s emancipation is impossible; the other proposes that it is only possible when you do not believe on religion. The question is, with these views, if any dialogue for women solidarity and equality between these groups is possible"
Klevius comment: Yes, if feminism is seen as I see it, namely as institutionalised sex segregation (also see From Klevius without love and Why do you call yourself a feminist, Judith Butler?.
Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship.
Totalitarian and fascist terror Islam in Uzbekistan and elsewhere.
"For the sake of Islam itself its true teachings should not be so clearly expressed"
"After Hizb ut-Tahrir’s appearance in Auburn, Iraqi exiles described protesters as fundamentalists sympathetic to al-Qaeda’s leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, saying they had held up the same black flag with white lettering that has appeared in the videos that precede beheadings of hostages in Iraq".
Disgustingly biased Swedish state media continue supporting Islamic fascist atrocities home and abroad!
When two Swedes living in Brazil get caught by Brazilian police for having filmed teenagers, that is a headline news in Swedish state radio, but when a barely 13-year old is drugged and raped by four Mideasterners in Sweden, or when a 60 year old women is robbed, beaten and threatened with knives and then raped by "five men" (plus hundreds, maybe thousands of similar cases), that is hardly even reported.
Islamic violent and totalitarian fascism abusing poor and powerless people (who often already have been abused by their own governments but now face the even worse threats and suffering from fundamentalist Islam, with blood traces to Islamic oil money) always get support from Swedish state media, which seems more interested in the spreading of Islam than of the best of the people.
When Islamic totalitarian fascism is spreading in Central-Asia, Swedish state radio solely focuses on "the wrong picture given by the tyrant head of the state", and the "liberation movement" (i e in practice Islamic terror and totalitarian Sharia fueled from Saudia-Arabia, Iran etc)!
When George W Bush visited Georgia and was celebrated by thousands BBC and other main news channels reported the enthusiastic welcoming as the main news of the day. But not in Sweden of course, where (Rapport et al) it was only briefly mentioned as a small secondary news that "Putin may dislike Bush's visit to Georgia today"!
When the ongoing Islamic slaughter and genocide in Sudan sometimes (very rarely) is mentioned in Swedish state media it is usually blamed on "Christian resistance movements", not the real Islamic culprits sitting in Khartoum, Egypt, Saudi-Arabia and elsewhere while innocent, poor blood is flooding for the sake of Islam and oil money!
When lunatic Islamists in Afganistan take every excuse to oppose the county's strive towards freedom and democracy Swedish state media focuses on toilets on Cuba, shanting like the barely teenage Islamic terrorists "Death to US"! Compare this to what Afganistan's elected president says: Mr. Karzai dismissed suggestions the protests are actually aimed at the presence of U.S and other allied forces in Afghanistan, saying the country would "go back immediately to chaos" if foreign forces left." He also says the violence is an attack on Afghanistan and the government will fight the threat as it fought Soviet occupiers in the 1980s. The president says he has ordered his security agencies to arrest anyone involved in fanning the unrest whether they are Afghans or foreigners.