Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Is it Obama's fault that he's a muslim born apostate? No, it's islam! Mr X "president's" fault is to "respect" it!

The evil joke(er) of the World!

Is Sharia "the common value" Obama and Cameron share and fight for?! I.e. the same as Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood. What's the difference?!

Obama clearly fights for Sharia replacing US Constitution and Human Rights. And Cameron has appointed a muslim (Sayeeda Warsi - see OIC pic on top of the page) as co-chair of his party.

Obama is not only a spat in the face of Africa and its suffering from more than a Millennia of islamic enslavement and genocides, but also a spat in the face of true Americans (no matter of race or sex)!

Muslim born apostate Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Mohammad Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) is unconstitutional simply because he is a muslim according to islamic Sharia, who hasn't openly admitted it nor has he openly committed apostasy.

Although apostasy is the worst crime in islam it also happens to be the very opposite and pride of the US Constitution.


Last but not lest: Obama's spat in the face of girls/women and their Human Rights globally

Whereas Human Rights treat girls/women as equals with boys/men, islamic Sharia NEVER allows a crack in its sex segregation! This means that according to Human Rights, a biological woman is allowed to herself decide how to lead her life just as men are allowed to. That includes the option of leading a sex segregated life. However, in islamic Sharia the first option is per definition (of Sharia) forever excluded. This has to do with islam's parasitic origin as based on enslavement and rapetivism.

As you know well by now (hopefully) the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC - 56+1 muslim or muslimified nations) have agreed to connect their constitutions to islamist Sharia and, believe it or not, call it islamic "human rights"!


Sharia in US


Center for Security Policy: "Our findings suggest that Shariah law has entered into state court decisions, in conflict with the Constitution and state public policy. Some commentators have said there are no more than one or two cases of Shariah law in U.S. state court cases; yet we found 50 significant cases just from the small sample of appellate published cases. Others state with certainty that state court judges will always reject any foreign law, including Shariah law, when it conflicts with the Constitution or state public policy; yet we found 15 Trial Court cases, and 12 Appellate Court cases, where Shariah was found to be applicable in the case at bar. The facts are the facts: some judges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with Constitutional protections. This is a serious issue and should be a subject of public debate and engagement by policymakers.

Klevius comment: Sadly, this research comes with a non-digestible result for the PC world and will automatically be dismissed by islam supporting media as "islamophobia". 


Also consider the following voice:





Tuesday, May 03, 2011

The snake is still alive. It's name is islam/OIC and its main jihadist, Mr X Obama, has occupied the house of freedom!

When Bush captured Saddam Hussein he was taken care of showered and shaved and delivered to the Iraqi authorities/legal system












However, Osama bin Laden was shot a second time while laying on the floor, then dumped into the sea

First muslim born Mr X "president" Obama ordered the murder of his muslim born fellow (both respect the same evil "religion" based on ultimate racism/sexism) Osama bin Laden. A summary execution without any firm evidence of guilty as charged. Then he ordered the disposal of the body in the sea. This stays in sharp contrast to Bush's capture and delivery of Saddam Hussein, a guy who was already proven guilty of mass murder!

Muslim born mr X "president" Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) is determined to replace/undermine the US Constitution. And on top of his islamist administration sits a fanatic muslim who has struggled to learn the Koran by heart, and now represents the US in OIC! You know, that very same OIC consisting of 56+1 nations who have agreed to violate Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia.

Don't let Mr X "president" and his islamists dupe you. The real threat isn't Al Qaeda but islam!


Sunday, May 01, 2011

Muslim born Obama: Osama bin Laden wasn't a muslim and had nothing to do with islam!

Coward and unconstitutional Obama ordered the illegal killing of Osama bin Laden out of fear for having him in the US or Guantanamo.

Obama dumped bin Laden's body in the sea, allegedly because he was a muslim, and had to be buried within 24 h!?
Did he also ordered muslim prayers and ceremonial cleaning of the body of this islamic jihadist?

This man (who has said he and Osama bin Laden aren't muslims) is a muslim according to islam, as is Osama bin Laden! And what about the majority of Pakistan citizens who call themselves muslims and support death penalty for apostates and any "defamation" of islam?!

Muslim born apostate (?) Mr X "president" Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama Soetoro (or whatever).


How come that Osama bin Laden was able to live a normal life in a farm house in a city settings built for him some five years ago in Abbotabad outside Islamabad?! In other words, he moved in about the same time as Pervez Musharraf, Bush's ally, moved out of immediate power in pakistan!












Islam is slowly strangled to death - only the name and some backward muslim societies and individuals remain - and OIC and its Sharia (Cairo declaration)





Indisputable scientific facts about islam:

1 Islam has by far been the worst crime against humanity for more than a Millennia!

2 There's no historical Mohammed to be found. No evidence whatsoever! That's why there's no "Mohammad's grave" either.

3 There's no Koran to be found before long after the non-existing Mohammed was allegedly dead. No evidence whatsoever!

4 There's no islam (other than the original parasitic looting, killing and raping one) to be found where it allegedly should have existed. No evidence whatsoever! The very idea of islam is parasitism which fact explains why devastation and backwardness has always been the result (when a thief/robber drives in a fancy car bought by stolen money we don't usually admirer his/her robber moral for it, do we).

5 There are no "oldest mosques" whatsoever. And in the case of Saudi Arabia, "the homeland of islam", the Saud/Wahhabi families (Mr X "president" Obama's first call) who robbed the country from its people by the help of funds they had gathered by (ab)using African and other slaves to gain wealth from date plantations, every effort has been made to destroy/remove/hide the real nature (incl. total lack) of what is now called "islam's holy places. The demolition has focused on mosques, burial sites, homes and historical locations associated with the non-existing Muhammed and many of the alleged founding personalities of early islamic fairy tales. In Saudi Arabia, many of the demolitions have officially been part of the continued expansion of the Masjid Al-Haram at Mecca and the non-existing Mohammed's "mosque" in Medina.

6 Islam has enslaved, murdered, raped etc more people during 1400 years than any other ideology incl. communism/national socialism.The currency of islamic finance has always been the enslavement of "infidels" (which includes all women).

But all you usually get is a bombastic stuck-up pile of fairy tale nonsense served to you via Wikipedia, other media, schools, universities, mosques etc by the help of propaganda money (i.e. Western oil/gas money) from the most evil of islamist dictatorships.







How come that U.S. now has the sleeziest and most disastrous "president" ever?!

Here's the answer. Google's Obama propaganda beats not only Goebbel's Nazi-propaganda but also every modern advertising agency. This telling snapshot is from today but it's a continuous flow of bias! How do they do it?!



















Always keep in mind that what kept islam going in the first place was its extreme racism and sexism!

Correction of misconceptions (spread by Google/other media) about muslim born Mr X "president Barry Barack Barak Barakeh Hussein Mohammad  Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever).

While Obama blinks, his first call and islamic mentor and "guardian of islam", the Saudi Abdullah, invades Bahrain and uses torture and nerve gas against Bahrain citizens. And what about Yemen etc? Btw, Obama's beloved Saudi Abdullah "king" has just shut down every info that isn't Sharia compliant. From now on the media will be prohibited from reporting anything that contradicts islamic Sharia or serves "foreign interests and undermines national security". In other words, the most intolerant country in the world now gets stiffer! And all of this while he's killing and jailing other muslims and non-muslims, not to mention the huge amount of slaves the Saudis use under the protection of Sharia.

Obama's muslim genitor was notorious for bad behavior and lack of moral backbone. He might even been a racist as his muslim father clearly was when he said the Obama blood shouldn't be sullied with white blood.

No matter how much "birtherism" or "islamophobism" media try to spray over you, the fact remains like bedrock: Obama was, according to islam, born a muslim, and if he has changed his "religion" then he's an apostate according to that very same islam that he supports and says he respects! This is the ultimate proof of islam's and Obama's evilness. And that makes him and islam unconstitutional and illegitimate in the US. You can't "respect" the denial of individual freedom/Human Rights, yet still pretending being not only American but America's president.

Has there ever existed a king, emperor or president who has made so many mistakes, mishaps, misjudgements, killings, cheatings etc. yet always got applause from the media?!


Misconceptions about Sharia


Al-Islam Students Association (AISA) lies continuously about islam under the title Islamic Sharia and Democracy. Fazal Syed (treasurer of AISA): It's a recurring topic in the news and a lot of people have misconceptions of what it is and isn't. We wanted to bring in experts to shed light on the issue and dispel myths that prevail in the media. There are six important principles of Sharia law, which are the right to protection of life, family, education, religion, property and human dignity. Don't these principles sound a lot like those espoused in our very own Constitution of the United States? The term 'Sharia law' is a misnomer, because Sharia is not law, but a set of principles.

Klevius clarification of AISA's and Fazal Syed's (and others) "misconceptions" about Sharia:

Sharia is the direct opposite to UN's Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948 which was established for the purpose of avoiding totalitarian movements.Whereas the original Human Rights declaration is based on negative rights, i.e. freedom for the individual, no matter of sex, ideology etc, Sharia opposes individual freedom, especially for girls, women and other "infidels".


OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) has, as the representative of 56+1 muslim nations, replaced Human Rights with islamist Sharia. Why? Because otherwise there wouldn't be any space for anti human rights islam! And the funny thing is that OIC now calls islamofascism "islamic human rights"!


With Obama Sharia is rapidly spreading throughout the US. Quite contrary to those naive blabbers who used to ridicule the very thought

According to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, Richard Callahan, “the Obama Administration would likely step in on behalf of Sharia law should any state try to ban it.”

And remember, there is really "one thing called Sharia", no matter how many different shapes it may take otherwise. That thing is what Klevius have written about for almost a decade now, i.e. the enormous principal difference between Sharia and Negative Human Rights! ALL forms of islamic Sharia share this basic tenet, i.e. to be opposed to the basics of Human Rights, and hence deeply racist and sexist, no matter how this racism and sexism is wrapped in empty and treacherous words as "dignity" etc.


Negative rights for a positive future - without islam

Islam is now, finally, strangled to death between Human Rights and evil medieval backwardness today represented by the Saudi dictator family and its horrifying creation, OIC.



Some interesting facts about islam (apart from it being the worst ideological crime ever committed against humanity):

Indisputable scientific facts about islam:

1 There's no historical Mohammed to be found. No evidence whatsoever! That's why there's no "Mohammad's grave" either.

2 There's no Koran to be found before long after the non-existing Mohammed was allegedly dead. No evidence whatsoever!

3 There's no islam (other than the original parasitic looting, killing and raping one) to be found where it allegedly should have existed. No evidence whatsoever! The very idea of islam is parasitism which fact explains why devastation and backwardness has always been the result (when a thief/robber drives in a fancy car bought by stolen money we don't usually admirer his/her robber moral for it, do we).

4 There are no "oldest mosques" whatsoever. And in the case of Saudi Arabia, "the homeland of islam", the Saud/Wahhabi families (Mr X "president" Obama's first call) who robbed the country from its people by the help of funds they had gathered by (ab)using African and other slaves to gain wealth from date plantations, every effort has been made to destroy/remove/hide the real nature (incl. total lack) of what is now called "islam's holy places. The demolition has focused on mosques, burial sites, homes and historical locations associated with the non-existing Muhammed and many of the alleged founding personalities of early islamic fairy tales. In Saudi Arabia, many of the demolitions have officially been part of the continued expansion of the Masjid Al-Haram at Mecca and the non-existing Mohammed's "mosque" in Medina.

5 Islam has enslaved, murdered, raped etc more people during 1400 years than any other ideology incl. communism/national socialism.The currency of islamic finance has always been the enslavement of "infidels" (which includes all women).

All you get is a bombastic stuck-up pile of fairy tale nonsense served to you via Wikipedia, other media, schools, universities, mosques etc by the help of propaganda money (i.e. Western oil/gas money) from the most evil of islamist dictatorships.