A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Is it Obama's fault that he's a muslim born apostate? No, it's islam! Mr X "president's" fault is to "respect" it!
Is Sharia "the common value" Obama and Cameron share and fight for?! I.e. the same as Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood. What's the difference?!
Obama clearly fights for Sharia replacing US Constitution and Human Rights. And Cameron has appointed a muslim (Sayeeda Warsi - see OIC pic on top of the page) as co-chair of his party.
Obama is not only a spat in the face of Africa and its suffering from more than a Millennia of islamic enslavement and genocides, but also a spat in the face of true Americans (no matter of race or sex)!
Muslim born apostate Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Mohammad Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) is unconstitutional simply because he is a muslim according to islamic Sharia, who hasn't openly admitted it nor has he openly committed apostasy.
Although apostasy is the worst crime in islam it also happens to be the very opposite and pride of the US Constitution.
Last but not lest: Obama's spat in the face of girls/women and their Human Rights globally
Whereas Human Rights treat girls/women as equals with boys/men, islamic Sharia NEVER allows a crack in its sex segregation! This means that according to Human Rights, a biological woman is allowed to herself decide how to lead her life just as men are allowed to. That includes the option of leading a sex segregated life. However, in islamic Sharia the first option is per definition (of Sharia) forever excluded. This has to do with islam's parasitic origin as based on enslavement and rapetivism.
As you know well by now (hopefully) the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC - 56+1 muslim or muslimified nations) have agreed to connect their constitutions to islamist Sharia and, believe it or not, call it islamic "human rights"!
Sharia in US
Center for Security Policy: "Our findings suggest that Shariah law has entered into state court decisions, in conflict with the Constitution and state public policy. Some commentators have said there are no more than one or two cases of Shariah law in U.S. state court cases; yet we found 50 significant cases just from the small sample of appellate published cases. Others state with certainty that state court judges will always reject any foreign law, including Shariah law, when it conflicts with the Constitution or state public policy; yet we found 15 Trial Court cases, and 12 Appellate Court cases, where Shariah was found to be applicable in the case at bar. The facts are the facts: some judges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with Constitutional protections. This is a serious issue and should be a subject of public debate and engagement by policymakers.”
Klevius comment: Sadly, this research comes with a non-digestible result for the PC world and will automatically be dismissed by islam supporting media as "islamophobia".
Also consider the following voice:
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
The snake is still alive. It's name is islam/OIC and its main jihadist, Mr X Obama, has occupied the house of freedom!
However, Osama bin Laden was shot a second time while laying on the floor, then dumped into the sea
First muslim born Mr X "president" Obama ordered the murder of his muslim born fellow (both respect the same evil "religion" based on ultimate racism/sexism) Osama bin Laden. A summary execution without any firm evidence of guilty as charged. Then he ordered the disposal of the body in the sea. This stays in sharp contrast to Bush's capture and delivery of Saddam Hussein, a guy who was already proven guilty of mass murder!
Muslim born mr X "president" Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) is determined to replace/undermine the US Constitution. And on top of his islamist administration sits a fanatic muslim who has struggled to learn the Koran by heart, and now represents the US in OIC! You know, that very same OIC consisting of 56+1 nations who have agreed to violate Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia.
Don't let Mr X "president" and his islamists dupe you. The real threat isn't Al Qaeda but islam!
Sunday, May 01, 2011
Obama dumped bin Laden's body in the sea, allegedly because he was a muslim, and had to be buried within 24 h!?
Did he also ordered muslim prayers and ceremonial cleaning of the body of this islamic jihadist?
This man (who has said he and Osama bin Laden aren't muslims) is a muslim according to islam, as is Osama bin Laden! And what about the majority of Pakistan citizens who call themselves muslims and support death penalty for apostates and any "defamation" of islam?!
How come that Osama bin Laden was able to live a normal life in a farm house in a city settings built for him some five years ago in Abbotabad outside Islamabad?! In other words, he moved in about the same time as Pervez Musharraf, Bush's ally, moved out of immediate power in pakistan!
Islam is slowly strangled to death - only the name and some backward muslim societies and individuals remain - and OIC and its Sharia (Cairo declaration)
Indisputable scientific facts about islam:
1 Islam has by far been the worst crime against humanity for more than a Millennia!
2 There's no historical Mohammed to be found. No evidence whatsoever! That's why there's no "Mohammad's grave" either.
3 There's no Koran to be found before long after the non-existing Mohammed was allegedly dead. No evidence whatsoever!
4 There's no islam (other than the original parasitic looting, killing and raping one) to be found where it allegedly should have existed. No evidence whatsoever! The very idea of islam is parasitism which fact explains why devastation and backwardness has always been the result (when a thief/robber drives in a fancy car bought by stolen money we don't usually admirer his/her robber moral for it, do we).
5 There are no "oldest mosques" whatsoever. And in the case of Saudi Arabia, "the homeland of islam", the Saud/Wahhabi families (Mr X "president" Obama's first call) who robbed the country from its people by the help of funds they had gathered by (ab)using African and other slaves to gain wealth from date plantations, every effort has been made to destroy/remove/hide the real nature (incl. total lack) of what is now called "islam's holy places. The demolition has focused on mosques, burial sites, homes and historical locations associated with the non-existing Muhammed and many of the alleged founding personalities of early islamic fairy tales. In Saudi Arabia, many of the demolitions have officially been part of the continued expansion of the Masjid Al-Haram at Mecca and the non-existing Mohammed's "mosque" in Medina.
6 Islam has enslaved, murdered, raped etc more people during 1400 years than any other ideology incl. communism/national socialism.The currency of islamic finance has always been the enslavement of "infidels" (which includes all women).
But all you usually get is a bombastic stuck-up pile of fairy tale nonsense served to you via Wikipedia, other media, schools, universities, mosques etc by the help of propaganda money (i.e. Western oil/gas money) from the most evil of islamist dictatorships.
Always keep in mind that what kept islam going in the first place was its extreme racism and sexism!
Correction of misconceptions (spread by Google/other media) about muslim born Mr X "president Barry Barack Barak Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever).
Obama's muslim genitor was notorious for bad behavior and lack of moral backbone. He might even been a racist as his muslim father clearly was when he said the Obama blood shouldn't be sullied with white blood.
No matter how much "birtherism" or "islamophobism" media try to spray over you, the fact remains like bedrock: Obama was, according to islam, born a muslim, and if he has changed his "religion" then he's an apostate according to that very same islam that he supports and says he respects! This is the ultimate proof of islam's and Obama's evilness. And that makes him and islam unconstitutional and illegitimate in the US. You can't "respect" the denial of individual freedom/Human Rights, yet still pretending being not only American but America's president.
Has there ever existed a king, emperor or president who has made so many mistakes, mishaps, misjudgements, killings, cheatings etc. yet always got applause from the media?!
Misconceptions about Sharia
Al-Islam Students Association (AISA) lies continuously about islam under the title Islamic Sharia and Democracy. Fazal Syed (treasurer of AISA): It's a recurring topic in the news and a lot of people have misconceptions of what it is and isn't. We wanted to bring in experts to shed light on the issue and dispel myths that prevail in the media. There are six important principles of Sharia law, which are the right to protection of life, family, education, religion, property and human dignity. Don't these principles sound a lot like those espoused in our very own Constitution of the United States? The term 'Sharia law' is a misnomer, because Sharia is not law, but a set of principles.
Klevius clarification of AISA's and Fazal Syed's (and others) "misconceptions" about Sharia:
Sharia is the direct opposite to UN's Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948 which was established for the purpose of avoiding totalitarian movements.Whereas the original Human Rights declaration is based on negative rights, i.e. freedom for the individual, no matter of sex, ideology etc, Sharia opposes individual freedom, especially for girls, women and other "infidels".
OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) has, as the representative of 56+1 muslim nations, replaced Human Rights with islamist Sharia. Why? Because otherwise there wouldn't be any space for anti human rights islam! And the funny thing is that OIC now calls islamofascism "islamic human rights"!
With Obama Sharia is rapidly spreading throughout the US. Quite contrary to those naive blabbers who used to ridicule the very thought
According to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, Richard Callahan, “the Obama Administration would likely step in on behalf of Sharia law should any state try to ban it.”
And remember, there is really "one thing called Sharia", no matter how many different shapes it may take otherwise. That thing is what Klevius have written about for almost a decade now, i.e. the enormous principal difference between Sharia and Negative Human Rights! ALL forms of islamic Sharia share this basic tenet, i.e. to be opposed to the basics of Human Rights, and hence deeply racist and sexist, no matter how this racism and sexism is wrapped in empty and treacherous words as "dignity" etc.
Islam is now, finally, strangled to death between Human Rights and evil medieval backwardness today represented by the Saudi dictator family and its horrifying creation, OIC.
Some interesting facts about islam (apart from it being the worst ideological crime ever committed against humanity):
Indisputable scientific facts about islam:
1 There's no historical Mohammed to be found. No evidence whatsoever! That's why there's no "Mohammad's grave" either.
2 There's no Koran to be found before long after the non-existing Mohammed was allegedly dead. No evidence whatsoever!
3 There's no islam (other than the original parasitic looting, killing and raping one) to be found where it allegedly should have existed. No evidence whatsoever! The very idea of islam is parasitism which fact explains why devastation and backwardness has always been the result (when a thief/robber drives in a fancy car bought by stolen money we don't usually admirer his/her robber moral for it, do we).
4 There are no "oldest mosques" whatsoever. And in the case of Saudi Arabia, "the homeland of islam", the Saud/Wahhabi families (Mr X "president" Obama's first call) who robbed the country from its people by the help of funds they had gathered by (ab)using African and other slaves to gain wealth from date plantations, every effort has been made to destroy/remove/hide the real nature (incl. total lack) of what is now called "islam's holy places. The demolition has focused on mosques, burial sites, homes and historical locations associated with the non-existing Muhammed and many of the alleged founding personalities of early islamic fairy tales. In Saudi Arabia, many of the demolitions have officially been part of the continued expansion of the Masjid Al-Haram at Mecca and the non-existing Mohammed's "mosque" in Medina.
5 Islam has enslaved, murdered, raped etc more people during 1400 years than any other ideology incl. communism/national socialism.The currency of islamic finance has always been the enslavement of "infidels" (which includes all women).
All you get is a bombastic stuck-up pile of fairy tale nonsense served to you via Wikipedia, other media, schools, universities, mosques etc by the help of propaganda money (i.e. Western oil/gas money) from the most evil of islamist dictatorships.