Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Friday, April 29, 2005
Pol Pot and Islam = submission under threats from brainwashed and abused lunatics. Muslim pedophilia defended by former "incest defender" Jan Guillou
Creeping totalitarian (fascist) Islam-Arabism: "What he wants, ultimately, are separate societies, segregated on the basis of skin color"
The socialist/Marxist/Stalinist Pol Pot was a mentally sick, confused ideological murderer. Just as today's mentally ill, Islamic lunatics who fanatically stick to the doomed Arabic-Islamic idea of Koranic threats and segregation as the soul of their "religion". In fact Islam isn't a religion but a pan-Arabic military/political totalitarian strategy based on dictated threats performed by abused mentally/socially lost and confused lunatic individuals. All of this now fueled by oil-for-Islam money.
30 yrs ago in 1975, when US left Indo-China, the Maoist Pol Pot regime started one of the world’s worst ideological genocides with millions of deads. Pol Pot and Maoism (learned in France) was heavily supported in Sweden and today many of them sit on influential positions (state, media etc), from where they now spit on the US while supporting Islamic terror. So, for example, is the Swedish international state radio (P6) headed by one of those thousands who deserted from the US army in the 60s and 70s, and were welcomed by the Maoist-friendly and US-hating Swedish government.
Klevius comment: The Swedes are the world's most lonely/lost people (see World Values Survey and Angels of Antichrist for a background). Wide open for political fanatism of the worst kind!
My (former) teenage friend visited me in Finland 1978-9 after having been in Kampuchea. He proudly and fanatically described the "progress" made by Pol Pot. He is now (when I heard abt him last time some yrs ago) paid by tax payers, sitting on a safe position in the Swedish SIDA, notorious for its "aid"-giving to communist and Islamist tyrant regimes around the world!
Islamic/Muslim sexism,intolerance and ultimate homophobia.
"there exists a contradiction in carrying a Muslim and a queer identity. Such a thing is not possible unless one waters down one or the other"
In a naive column in Aftonbladet Jan Guillou (author of popular fiction, often based on charlatanic research) seems to argue that it was OK for Mohammed to marry and have sex with a 14 year old child (in fact Aisha was most probably only 9). He also calls the 18 year old Aisha a general/commander, and uses that weird argument as "evidence" for Aisha's emancipation (sic). "Because Mohammed "wrote" the Koran (see Klevius true story of Islam in brief), which is "the last word and should not be changed", one might conclude that this is a main reason why Islamic child marriages are still so popular! Jan Guillou has had major difficulties to comprehend the theoretical background of feminist thinking and hence, quite rightly, I would say, considered a sexist chauvinist (see What is sex segregation? and From Freud to bin Ladin and From Klevius without love: sex, kinship and friendship). Is that why he seeks comfort in an "unchangeable", sexist Middle-Age "religion" (rather a military strategy for conquest and exploitation), and why he supports terrorist actions (as I assume he does, on the basis of his writings).
Also see "The great Muslim gang rape cover up"!
Thursday, April 21, 2005
Politically battered Swedish woman: To really understand the bottomless political hatred and male malevolence (i e sexism) that poured out from the Swedish state reporter’s mouth when he was supposed to take an interview with Ms Ahlenius, you may read the posting below from February, 24, (comparison betweeen her and the cultural "state pedophile" Ms. Osten).
“How old are you? I heard you are already 66! Shouldn’t you stay home and play with the grandkids?" Etc etc!
For more exciting facts abt Sweden see Klevius News Desk.
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
Islam, the totalitarian ideology of slavery, child soldiers, Arab racism/sexism/genocide in Sudan, Mauretania, etc etc!
The modern left and Islamic fascism.
Mohammed was married with his favourite wife Aisha from when she was 9 until she was 18:
"What are the essential features of pedophilia.?
Professors of psychiatry, Harold I.Kaplan MD and Benjamin J.Sadock MD. of New York University Medical School states the essential features to diagnose pedophilia are:
1.Identification with and narcissistic investment in immature sexual objects.
Muhammad's infatuation and relationship with Aisha fits this criterion. And Mohammad was vain too - he liked to use perfume and dye his hair (even as an old man).
2. Control, domination and seduction of children.
A slight recalcitrance on the part of his wives was met by intolerant threats like: "if he (Muhammad) divorce you, (Allah) will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins." [K 66.5]
3. Sexual activity with children is preferential and occur repeatedly.
Aisha was ever present, right up to his last fatal breath and he preferred spending his nights with her. Aisha became Muhammad's favorites wife. And the sexuality in the relationship was predominant. [Sahih Bukhari 1.270,3:36,7:6,3:148,3:149,3:150,7:142,IbnSa'd 1pg165]"
Disgusting Muslim hypocrisy and contempt for other people's rights and lives uttered by a Swedish Imam in Swedish state radio P!:
Muslim Imam: "Most Muslims don't support killing of Islam critics"!
Background: A Swedish Christian repeated, in his sermon, what was already widely known, spread and debated, namely that Mohammed married a 9 yr girl and hence could be named a pedophile. Because of this, lunatic "Muslims" have allegedly threatened to kill him.
When should Imams and other Muslims get the courage to tell other Muslims that Muslims are not a bit better humans than those denying Allah, i e the "infidels? Or do you refuse?
Klevius comment: So obviously many Muslims do support killing of unbelievers or Islam critics!? If so, then the Haag tribunal and other courts should be really busy for a long time, shouldn't it?! But the same Imams also use to say that bin Ladin & Co are no "real Muslims"!? Doesn't this scenario ultimately prove what is written in Koran (and Koran is always right, isn't it?) and whereby Islam differs from most/all other religions/ideologies, namely that the "peaceful" (there is no peace, only submission in Islam according to Koran) Muslims suck the blood delivered by the not so peaceful "Muslim" Jihadists. This is the very (and only) real power of Islam, but has, of course, to be cut out from the teaching if Muslims want to be taken seriously as participants in a democratic world resting on (negative) human rights! And what about these "Muslim" Imams "balancing on hypocrisy" themselves? What does lunatic, totalitarian, anti human rights, sexist and fasistoid "Fatwa-Muslim" murderers really think about them?
Now Mr/Ms Muslim! The only chance for a Muslim who insists on continuing as a Muslim, without being a totalitarian sexist/racist/fascist, is to cut off these ties by saying: Even those who completely and with no return deny Allah and Mohammed are exactly as good humans as are Muslims (i e in accordance with the UN Declaration of Human Rights). Furthermore non-religious individuals without the support from a religious/political state sponsored organization should be compensated. And the real poor morons are those lunatic Jihadist abusers/murderers/rapists mentioned above who commit blasphemy against the Allah of all real Muslims by violating human rights etc! OK! They need, and should get immediate care! So Mr/Ms Muslim! Only by doing this you can feel freee to mingle as an equal among equals (without lunatic totalitarian ideas of "the only right religion" or "the final religious solution" etc.) "Infidels" are exactly as good as you are, right! Got it? Good!
See Klevius Fundamentalist test + Definition of (negative) Human Rights).
Definition of religion!
Is Islam the worst killer/exploiter ever?
More than thousand years of the world's worst slave trading, genocides, exploitation, compulsion, rapetivism etc etc, All connected by a single ideology - Islam!
"The fixed linkage between jihad- a permanent, uniquely Islamic institution- and enslavement, provides a very tenable explanation for the unparalleled scale and persistence of slavery in Muslim dominions, and societies. This general observation applies as well to “specialized” forms of slavery, including the (procurement and) employment of eunuchs, slave soldiering (especially of adolescents), other forms of child slavery, and harem slavery. Jihad slavery, in its myriad manifestations, became a powerful instrument for both expansive Islamization, and the maintenance of Muslim societies"
"For the sake of Islam itself its true teachings should not be so clearly expressed"
Hypocritic statement by Swedish "Islamologist" Jan Hjerpe: "Today's values aren't applicable to Mohammed's time"! Really? So what abt Koran?! Is Hjerpe a new Mohammed? Same hypocrisy, and the same will to sit on two chairs simultaneously as the "Imam" above! Don't fall in between! Doesn't this remark alone disqualify him from using the title "Islamologist"?
Mohammed as a pedophile?.
"[T]he Prophet (Muhammed) married her (Aisha) when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old"
"Jerry Falwell called Islam’s founder Mohammed, "a terrorist" on 60 MINUTES, while Dr. Jerry Vines, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Jacksonville, Fla., declared that Muhammad was a “demon-possessed pedophile"
Klevius comment: No matter if we deal with hard (terrorists and their supporters) or soft (Muslim feminists etc) Islam, the underlying racism/fascism/sexism consists of the basic idea of "infidels" as less worthy humans. In fact, no "real humans" at all according to Islam, unless they submit themselves to - yes, Islam (that's what we used to name totalitarianism and fascism)! And if they are Jews or Christians they already belong to Islam although they haven't realized it fully as yet! Islam is the fulfilment of these faulty religions and all others are non-humans. See Klevius Fundamentalist test and Definition of Religion!
From Maoism to Islamism.
When the fascist Maoist ideology of Pol Pot had been "taught" to children to make them kill at least 1,6 million civilians, the Swedish pro-Pol Pot state TV broadcasted a documentary (1979) where Jan Myrdal (the son of the famous Gunnar Myrdal who researched the "Negro question" in the US in the 1940s) stated that "It's sad but perhaps necessary"! What abt today's totalitarian, racist/sexist and fascist Islamism?! Shouldn't we start counting, not only the Islamic victims in Sudan and elsewhere but also all the anonymous victims of Islam fuelled street rapes/violence?
Have you ever really thought abt the Islamic proposal of having the last say (No other prophets allowed after the founder of Islam, you know!)? And has it really become obvious for you that Jihad (in all forms) and the Arabic language are the fascist/racist/sexist means by which Islam is spread and kept together against the non-human "infidels"? And finally, the totalitarian and lunatic (especially for those already confused and misled youngsters and girls/women without self-esteem of their own)idea that Islam should rule the whole world via Sharia!
Also see The longest Holocaust - the Arabic/Islamic slave trade in Africa and elsewhere!
"The challenge is to overcome preconceived ideas and biases by examining Islamic source materials in an objective and rational manner. One must acknowledge what the source material actually teaches. We need the attitude of a student who is open to learning new concepts and is willing to correct beliefs when mistaken. (Muslim terror) is a natural part of real Islam. The tragedy is that until we realize the darkness in Islam, we will not be able to properly confront and deal with that darkness."
Klevius comment: Boys from Mars and girls from Venus! Why not come back to Tellus where you belong? The underlying problem of Islam is sex segregation (yes I've said it before). Interestingly the "difference feminism" that has been so successful during the 1990s and until now, has been followed by the most tremendous rise in rapes, violence and a widening gap between the sexes. In fact, young people in Sweden today talk in a way that could be easily translated into late Victorian society. Young Swedish males 2005: "I think we should be equal but I also think we are inherently different, so that's why I should wash the car (an old-fashioned, second class quality, one-wheel-driven BMW I presume?! see Euro-vulgo vs Japanese high tech) and she should make the food". Teenage boys (seemingly originating from Islamic countries) shouting at soccer girls: "Girls shouldn't play soccer. Only boys can play", just as people used to do in the late Victorian era some hundred years ago! THANK YOU FEMINISM (yes, again as it was 100 years ago when feminists begun "guarding femininity")! No wonder that totalitarian and sex rigid ideas from the Middle Ages flourish.
While Christian heritage and churches in Sweden are burned and destroyed, Swedish state media focuses on to spit on a Christian evangelist who dared to critisize Islam! And the Swedish state med8ia applaudes Islam and helps and supports Islam in every respect while being silent as a mouse when it come to atrocities committed by Islamists.
From Klevius without love - a radical analysis of what feminism is really about.