Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Swedish Islamist Leif "Abd al Haqq" Karlsson, naive (or hypocrite & traitor?) top imam denies women a social life outside home
Definition of sex segregation (and feminism).
Acknowledgement for the reader: Islam/Muslims shouldn't be confused with immigration/immigrants! And Muslim (see Definition of religion) immigrants should first pass the Fundamentalist test before accepting themselves or being accepted as democratic participants respecting the holy 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration in a democratic society!
Logic that excludes Islamic racism/sexism: From Klevius without love: Sex, kinship and friendship (non-sex marriage, the Vagina gate and the atom of kinship).
Sweden is one of the worst hit countries in Europe of Muslim immigration and Political Correctness.
Abd al Haqq Kielan, as Leif Karlsson now prefers to call himself, is the ultimate example of a naive and confused Westerner who has fallen in the Islamic trap he has himself assisted to dig with the help of his own projections on what he thinks is Islam.
Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan also says he doesn't believe in political Islam (i e the only Islam that is now relevant) but that he is a little bit surprised (sic) about the many young political Islamists in the mosques!
also see: "Unveiled women beg for rapes" Forum mot Islamisering (Forum against Islamization)!
Klevius comment: Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan is in person the ultimate proof for Klevius statement that the Swedes are the world's most lost people (according to the World Values Survey and hence also most vulnerable for political, sexist, pan-Arab(ic) Islam. Did Leif crash his head against the uncertainty/dynamics of ultimate modernity, and then bounced back to the darkest corner of the Middle Ages (also see e.g. Slavery and the Infidel in Islam for a start)?
Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan's statement that women shouldn't be allowed a social life outside home, clearly reveals a complete misinterpretation of the world of today. In fact, (see e g What is sex segregation?) the future of Islam is Muslim feminism (i e very much outside the home but still heavily sex segregated).
Behind the timid looking Leif Karlsson/Abd al Haqq Kielan's back Islamic racism and sexism keeps growing. One of his co-traitors (feminism and Islam both share the same bases of rigid sex segregation), head of the Domestic Violence Unit at the Malmö Police, Anna Gustafsson, claims that we are dealing with a “technical” increase, not a real one. However, national statistics reveal that reported rapes against children have almost doubled in Sweden during the past ten years. The number of rape charges per capita in Malmö is 5 – 6 times that of Copenhagen,
Poor Leif, I'm sorry to say that you might have been betrayed and abused as a tool for political Islam, and that you probably don't even have the courage to escape your betrayers and your own private illusions.
Where is the Kierkegaard of today, capable of desarming a political world "religion" with totalitarian and racist ("infidels") sexist ambitions? "For Kierkegaard, the true meaning of Christianity is the individual standing alone before and in the presence of a transcendent God"
If you have even the remotest belief that Islam could be democratic start with Klevius' definition of religion and The holy 1948 Declaration on Universal Human (negative) Rights. If you are puzzled with the "holy" see posting below Thursday, May 12, 2005!
If, on the other hand, Leif Karlsson isn't naive one may be forced to consider the possibility that he is a traitor:
"The doctrine of Jihad and Jizya essentially means building the Islamic Empire by denying infidels all rights except the right to serve their Muslim masters. The secret of Islam’s survival and longevity lies in both the deceptive cloak it wears in the form of a religion, and in the fact that economic weakness is always inherited by states based on its tenants. Up until the age of oil this has made Islamic countries appear relatively unthreatening"
Although we use to reject undemocratic and fascist movements and parties, the worst of them all, Islam, is by many allowed to continue to sponge on human rights and democracy. Why?
When asked why he converted to Islam Leif Karlsson refers to his trip to Morocco in the 70s, and how "nice it was" and the "small streets and the crowd of people" etc. If Leif Karlsson had been less naive and had read more facts rather than the Koran he'd be more familiar with the reality of Islam (e.g. Edmondo de Amicis' - a basically Islam friendly author - revealing 19th century trip to Morocco or Today's reality of Arab/Islamic slave trading in North-Africa!
Oil-for-Islam in Sweden?
Christer Nilsson, minister and deputy head of mission at the Swedish Embassy: “We want to let Saudis know that Sweden is a friendly country, where processing a visa application would not take more than ten days,” Nilsson said, adding that endorsement of Schengen visa by any of the member countries entitles a tourist to visit them without any hassle."
The naive and impossible idea of non-Muslims living together with Muslims is like the impossibility for a non-Muslim/Muslim marriage to be successful (without the non-Muslim converting to Islam):
"And do not marry Al-Mushrikaat (idolatresses) till they believe (worship Allaah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress), even though she pleases you” “And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al‑Mushrikoon till they believe (in Allaah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater)
So, the only way to go is, in the global end, non-Muslim. Why? Because of the rigidity (totalitarian racism and sexism) inherited in Islam itself:
"We (Muslims) Will Rule America; Israel is a Cancer; Jews are a Virus Resembling AIDS; Muslims Will Finish Them Off".
Klevius* comment: What about us non-Jews, non-Christians, non-Muslims, non-Communists and non-Feminists? Sorry, I forgot - we don't even count as humans.
Sucking money from the state(s) is so much easier if you belong to, say, an Islamic(ist) organization. Islam, the "religion" that has created little except violence, slavery, exploitation, senseless powerty, and colorful mosques built by innocent blood, has now become more powerful just because it happens to sit on the top of an oil-well, which it was unable to even open without the help of the "infidels"!
Islam, a shaky and hence hypersensitive totalitarian "poligion" protected by oil, "white collars" and socially lost lunatic jihadists
An "Arab" racist ethnicity and an "Arabic" language, which is in fact a very late branch of Hebrew and Aramaic - the language of Jesus. In fact it seems that the necessary full written Arabic wasn't even around at the time of Koran, which is basically a Syro-Aramaic liturgical Christian scripture that was "spiced" with "Arabism", i.e. the tools/rules necessary for conquest and exploitation. (Note! You "Arabs" who aren't Muslims, have all my respect. And you who pretend you are a Muslim, stop it and fight for your self respect and a FREE world - most of the world will support you!)! Because I'm almost convinced that "Arabs", behind their Islamic intellectual and sexist/racist yoke, have the same capabilities as other people, abandoning Islam would most probably finally open up for real productivity in "Arab" countries. I look forward to buy the first high quality tech product really Made in Arabia by Arabs (it doesn't need to be even close to the almost unreachable Made in Japan top level Shinto technology, though).
Islamic desecration of The Holy and Universal 1948 (negative) Human Rights Declaration
Pre-Islam "Arabs" used to reveal an overwhelming immorality, and were robbing trading caravans, and sold the stolen goods at dumped prices on the market, hence destroying every effort for a decent commerce. But Islam was not the moral correction needed (as many seem to belief), but on the contrary its ultimate perfection to become a tool for conquest, robbery and exploitation on a global (and most often "white collar") scale.
If Islamic "Arabs" really want to be accepted as global citizens they have to entirely abandon Islam and everything it stands for! On the wealthy sheik level as well as on the lunatic jihadist level! Such a move (which is inevitable and already in progress albeit too slowly for the sake of the victims of Islam) will also open up for the REAL emancipation for those women who have been affected in one way or another by this heritage from the Middle Age desert robberers.
After 9/11: Hugo Chavez (Venezuela) financed Al Qaeda with some $1M donation because he was so impressed and happy by the deed!
How much do Islamic "Arabs" in the West gain of the support Islamic organizations (legal and illegal) suck from Western states compared to non-Islamic immigrants (who might even be refugees from Islamic genocide and other atrocities)?!
It was perfectly understandable to create, and then to present to those conquered, a belief-system that would incorporate bits and pieces of Christianity and Judaism, and yet be a supersessional and supremacist ideology (with "Arabs" and the Arabic language always supreme) that would appeal, because of those elements of the prior montheisms, to those very Christians and Jews (or, later, the Zoroastrians of Persia). Muhammad is depicted above all as an Arab tribal leader, a warrior, striking temporary truces, ordering political assassinations, doing whatever he had to do to increase his own worldly power. Islam is not an other-worldly belief system.
Basically Islam now constitutes the major desecration of the holy 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration! Why isn't it, as a totalitarian/fascist movement officially prosecuted! It can't be hidden/protected behind filtered "good" interpretations when the Islamic reality in Sudan and elsewhere around the globe clearly shows evilness!
The Swedish fascist* state propaganda media deliberately misleads listeners by naming suicide bombers "car bombs" (other media usually talk about "suicide car bombers")hence trying to hide the horrible fact that youth/children are unscrupulously brainwashed and cheated in Islamic Koran schools, to give their and their victimes blood for a fascist and totalitarian cause!
* Remember that Sweden has been a one-party state for approximately the same time as the USSR. And whereas the Sovjet has fallen, Sweden is now possibly the heart of the world's neo-fascism (Islamic), not the least bcause it is able to hide its real face behind the widespread myth of the welfare Sweden (see Angels of Antichrist" and "In democratic countries this takes place when competing propagandists resolve their differences and agree upon one propaganda. This maneuver can be seen in amalgamations or agreements within political, economic, educational, and religious groups."
While girls and women are systematically raped and killed together with the males in Sudan, Swedish fascist Islam supporting state media closes its eye against news like: the Arab militiamen appeared "happy when they raped. They sing when they rape and tell us we are just slaves and they can do whatever they wish."
The fascist Swedish state media has a similar attitude when Swedish girls/children/women are raped/abused by Islamic gangs in Sweden.
Sweden has appointed a Sharia Islam supporter (Masoud Kamali) as the government's "expert" for how to strenghten Islam in Sweden!
According to Mr. Kamali, Muslim families should be excluded from scrutiny in cases of suspected child or woman abuse, because they have a different "tradition" and shouldn't be forced to follow Swedish customs.
The African heroine Ayan Hirsi Ali ("the left is exactly like the Muslims - Islamic abuse of immigrant women isn't a priority") now seems to be the first real crack in the fascist movement consisting of sex segregated sharia Islam and Western leftists and feminists. Klevius site on sex segregation and negative human rights is so far the only one addressing the underlying and ultimate problem, i.e. sex segregation and the social state (already profiled 1996 in Angels of Antichrist). I'm sure Hanna Arendt should have loved it.
So what's good about Sweden anyway?