Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

Do Americans and Pompeo share the Saudi hate against Shia muslims?

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis

In the 8 October 2016 Sana'a (Yemen) funeral bombing by Saudi Arabia 155 people were killed and at least 525 more wounded when two airstrikes, about three to eight minutes apart, hit the packed Al Kubra hall. US and UK happy with the Saudis investigating it.

This Swedish muslim MP wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

BBC squeezes in Eng-land cricket in every news report - while UK-land plays borderless Brexit - and football is divided in four UK-lands, Welsh, English, Irish and Scottish players, and two top leagues with whatever players!? Confusing? Not even close to the "British" measuring decaphobia. English isn't "British", it belongs to the world. British stands for imperialism, colonialism, slavery and cooperation with islamofascists.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Islam is the problem - China is the solution.

If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!

* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!

Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC  News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?

Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome.

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.

As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.

Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Top emitters

Top emitters

Peter Klevius evolution formula

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad.
However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.
UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China. Klevius: How come that islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc. 'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China, which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!
UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.

If you don't like Klevius (very few do) you may check if it's him or the anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration you can't digest - but which Klevius stubbornly keeps feeding you.

Iran, Corbyn, bin Laden's son etc. - it's more about protecting BBC's poster boy, war criminal and state terrorist Mohammad Salman, than protecting people on the streets from Saudi exported racist islamic hate terror.

Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?

The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.

Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

Do you support Human Rights or sharia?
Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR. For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.

UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Listen to this Viking about the danger of religion
Martina Big (aka Malaika Kubwa) wanted to be "black". We don't know exactly why. However, fair skinned politicians and media people who support black supremacism, Nation of Islam etc. might consider following her example.

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against the people

Politicians against the people

Rule Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

UK PM escapes muslim terror induced by her "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Friday, July 29, 2011

Politically correct but heavily misleading "science" confuses Africa and Siberia!

For you who don't understand anthropology but are bombarded with misleading "out of Africa" political correctness.

Genetically modern humans evolved in Siberia some 40,000-35,000 years ago. The Western (European) arm of this (hybrid)evolution is genetically known as M173.

Now Guardian reports new "research": "Neanderthals died out in Western Europe after a surge of modern humans arrived from Africa and made them a minority in their own land, researchers claim."

Klevius correction: An extremely misleading sentence (I'm open for the horrifying possibility that this really reflects what the "researchers" reported) keeping in mind the by now well established fact that those modern humans DID NOT come from Africa but from Siberia! See Klevius anthropology blog for an updated and more far reaching analysis of how we came to become "modern"!

I do understand the demand for Africa centrism after islam's 1400 years of total destruction of the continent, mainly through slavery, rapetivism and genocides. However, this fact shouldn't pave the way for biased science, should it.
Africa is by now contaminated with bad/biased tendentious anthropology which eagerly tries to repeat the European mistake from long ago but now as Africa centrism.

So what was it that came "out of Africa" (and later on back to Africa as modern humans)?

This is a possible view of the chimp brained small creature who came "out of Africa"! But he wasn't even close to what we call a modern human

Brain size just slightly more than a modern chimp and a stature just over a meter. We can find physical and genetical remains of her/him in South East Asia as well as in Siberia (Denisova). S/he might have been a product of chimp/Homo hybridization either in the jungle part of Africa or South East Asia. We actually know almost nothing about this because the lack of fossils from jungle areas. Almost all physical anthropology is relying on "easy to pick" findings.

Why were all the pre-Aurignacian Homos so extremely dumb compared to their brain size?!

Yes, there were bigger and more human like creatures tramping around both in Africa and Eurasia but before the Aurignacian* revolution, which started in Eurasia some 32- 35,000 years ago and never touched Africa, the existing cultural remains are on a level not at all comparable with Aurignacian production or the modern human brain.

* Watch up here, dude! Precisely because of the racist European view (among some Europens) more than 100 years ago, the pendulum has now swung back to a political correctness that tries to delete anything that could "offend" non-Europeans. But hey, luckily modern man wasn't born in Europe but in Siberia. S/he only came to inhabit the then fertile European environment! But because of this political correctness the concept 'Aurignacian' has now (by some) been stretched to include non-modern humans from the period just before.

In fact, the Aurignacian explosion was so staggering (see for yourself e.g. the 32,000 year old so called "Lion man" below found in Germany!) that one may seriously ask whether those modern Eurasians were in fact even more intelligent than we are? I for one haven't been able to find equally well made artifacts (not to mention paintings) from the early civilization periods in e.g. Mideast.

Aurignacian art from Europe 32,000 years ago

When the small chimp-human hybrid spread "out of Africa" this was because s/he had a brain better packed than anyone else. As a fertile hybrid s/he managed to breed with bigger (but proportionally dumber) Homos. However, only in the demanding but also rewarding cold climate in the North could the new "bastards" evolve. The "purest" of these "bastards" (Floresiensis-Denisovan-Neanderthal-Homo hybrids) may well have caused a peak in intelligence which later flattened out because of back migration and mixing with not so "pure" Homos. This eventually resulted in the "bastard belt and the global mongoloids on the map below.

Because of our culture and technology we wrongly assume that today's humans are the most intelligent ones. Moreover, just because we possess "sleeping genes" many assume the evolution towards more intelligence is still on. However, nothing could be more wrong because the evoöutionary demand for more intelligence has long since stopped because we are way too many already on the planet. Evolution needs small pockets.

So although Klevius may not be equally intelligent as the Aurignacian stone age wo/man he nonetheless may represent a mild intellectual breeze from the past. Check for yourself on EMAH the even more astonishing hypothesis, and, at the same time, prepare yourself to meet your future master the internet connected AI robot.

The "bastard belt"

Please, don't confuse this "bastard" modern human <30,000 years ago with the "bastard" chimp/Homo hybrid mentioned above. The map is a rough overview of human races before "colonialism" reached the Americas..

Red are mongoloids (i.e. modern humans)
Grey are the bastards (also called "caucasoid")

Btw, could all this also have something to do with the fact that some black men often prefer white/Asian women rather than from their own "race"?!

And of course you already knew that the native Africans were mongoloids (San, Khoisan, "Bushmen" etc) and came from Asia in a genetic back migration after the birth of the modern humans in Siberia.

And of course you knew that islam is creationist and doesn't approve of human evolution, only the rest of nature may have evolved but not the muslim man!

More on why Mideast always has lagged behind and why the first wheeled vehicles came from the north. Plus some stunning examples of Aurignacian early art.

Great Zimbabwe is sub-Saharan Africa's biggest monument of shame

Posting Sept 2008: Peter Klevius is the first one to connect Great Zimbabwe in the south, Mideast islam and the Vikings in the north. Great Zimbabwe emerged out of Bantu slave trade but became "great" precisely because of its connection with Arab islamic slave trade! Although GZ peaked much later than the Vikings it started at the same time. Check for yourself the grim construction of GZ and its river connections to the early East-African Arab islamic mosques! GZ is sub-African greatest symbol of Bantu racism (Africa's aborigines, Pygmies, Khoi- people etc have long before islam been systematically enslaved by black Bantus) aided by Arabian islamofascism!

The "African spring" in the Arab world more than a Millennia ago - An echo of early islam

The upraisal (against their Arab masters) of some 500.000 East-African male slaves more than thousand years ago (taken by islamist muslims in accordance with the teachings of the Koran) in a tiny part of what is now Iraq tells something abt the scale of islamic slavery. Moreover, all indicators point to the fact that slave girls were the most common trade commodity for islam. Also note that most of the so called Portuguese slave traders in Africa were in fact Jews and muslims expelled because of their dirty profession!

Ibn Battuta's islamist voice from the time of early Renaissance*:

* Renaissance was a precursor of Enlightenment as a counter force against islamic slavery/rapetivist Sharia as seen in the northern Italy's (Jewish) interface with Ottoman (Turkish) islamofascism (compare Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice). This development resembles that of the rise of Catholic ruke in Europe as a counter force to islam.

“The cathedral mosque, which was formerly a church greatly venerated by the Greeks, is one of the most beautiful in the world. I bought a Greek slave girl here for forty dinars.”

This is perfectly in line with Klevius analysis of the original and main function of mosques. Ibn Battuta is perhaps one of the best examples of islam's deep hypocritical attitude towards humans. He happily bought, received and abused sex slaves while opposing prostitution etc.,

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Is OIC (Sharia islam) combined with Western silence a (the?) main reason to the Oslo/Norway tragedy?

How many lives and suffering could have been saved in Oslo (and worldwide) if politicians, media and educators had been more open about what islam really stands for (i.e. the very opposite to the very foundation of the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration)  instead of indoctrinating people with Saudi propaganda?

The picture of islam is usually presented by referring to law abiding "ordinary" "peaceful" muslims well suited as members of a free democratic rule of law resting on the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration. However, a completely opposite picture of islam emerges when we look at the dirty and treacherous organization (OIC) that represents ALL the world's muslims.This organization has in effect now denied its member states' citizens their true Human Rights!

See here and here (UN webcast) for youself how islamist countries try to embarrass/silence those very few in UN who dear to criticize this modern anti-Human Rights fascism monster OIC/islam and Sharia.

Why is OIC (the world organization of muslims) desecrating Universal Human Rights?

Roy Brown, immediate past president of the International Humanist and Ethical Union: "It is intolerable that the very values on which UK society is based - human rights, equality and the rule of law - are being undermined by the quiet and insidious application of systems of law that have no basis in equality or justice."

Klevius comment: To fully understand the philosophical power of the basic (negative) rights in the Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948 (a declaration made to ensure global freedom from fascism and totalitarianism for everyone on the planet) your best and deepest analysis is here.

OIC's latest and so far most deadly "achievement" in UN's internal "civil war" between Human Rights and islamic Sharia

OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu (from Turkey) describing the creation of the Independent Permanent Commission on Human Rights (IPCHR): “We have been acting swiftly through an open and credible process in taking concrete steps toward establishing the IPCHR.”

OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu (from Turkey): “The new commission will be totally independent. The 18 human rights experts from 18 different Arab, Asian and African member states will decide their own agenda.”

"Saudi" Arabia (the initiator of the Sharia based Cairo Declaration 1990 and OIC) and Iran could not agree on where the panel would be headquartered. However, Jeddah in "Saudi" Arabia (the place where OIC's headquarter already resides) was eventually decided after Ihsanoglu's persuation (?!).
Saudi delegates allegedly "expressed immense satisfaction". “The OIC Secretariat is in Jeddah, and Jeddah is in Saudi Arabia. According to one delegate: "You can put it in many different ways, but the fact remains that the commission will be headquartered in Saudi Arabia — that is it”.
Klevius comment: Well, this is quite logical, isn't it. The worst Human Rights violator on the planet houses the bomb that blew UN into pieces. And why not move the rest of the UN wreck to Mecca where non-muslims aren't even allowed. That would effectively eliminate islamophobic defenders of Human Rights from disturbing UN.

And here's is muslim born (a muslim born Penis is all taht's needed for a child to become a muslim) Mr X "president" who hasn't committed apostasy as yet (alternatively is a secret muslim) who says he "respects" the worst crime ever against humanity, and who has appointed a muslim Koran reader (a fanatic who has learned the Koran by heart) to represent the US in OIC!

Friday, July 22, 2011

Norway tragedy*: Whoever it was it wasn't peaceful islam or the nice Saudi Sharia "prince"* Alwaleed bin Talal**... or was it?!

* It wasn't ideological terrorism like islamic jihadism but an individual massmurderer.  
** why is a subtly hate mongering son of the world's most disgusting and ruthless dictator families called a "prince"?! And why isn't Saudi Arabia's role in islamic world terror even discussed?! And why is Saudi Arabia allowed to state terrorize Bahrainis etc without any reaction from the world community? And why are children taught that islam has been/is a peaceful religion when the truth is as opposite it could be. And all the non-reported islam connections behind jihadism inspired attacks on non-muslims around the world on a daily basis?!

The Norwegian mass-murderer said he'd got enough of islam propaganda

Could a more balanced view on islam have avoided the Norwegian tragedy?

We are taught it's "islamophobic" to suspect islam or its guardian the Saudi dictator family for inciting terror. We are taught to blink islam's historical atrocities although history easily proves islam as the worst ideological hate crime ever. And we are taught to to blink the ongoing slaughtering raping and intimidation against non-muslims around the world.

This is Alwaleed bin Talal, the Saudi "prince" who has never worked but lives on Western oil money which he uses to incite hatred against non-muslims. He represents the Saudi dictator family in their Sharia effort to take over or crash media, research etc around the world critical of islam. His last target was Murdoch.

The Norwegian connection

First it was allegedly a group called "Helpers of Global Jihad" (Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami) that has taken responsibility for the Norwegian terror. This is the same group as the Stockholm bomber in December 2010.

Then it turned out to be a Norwegian "Oklahoma-bomber" named Anders Behring Breivik.

Klevius comment: Clearly muslim organizations want the "honor" of having done it in the name of islam. However, when it turns out to be a non-muslim behind the terror, then, will we see the same rhetoric as Alwaleed bin Talal used after 9/11, namely that it was the country's own fault?! I.e. in this case that Norway should be more open for the views of whatever, if anything, he represented?! And if it had been a Koran reading muslim we'd been told it got nothing to do with islam. Now when it's a Bible reading Christian we supposedly will be told it got nothing to do with neither of these two extremisms although we know for sure that islam does its best to eliminate Christians around the world with almost no reaction from media and politicians.  And in the very homeland of islam, Alwaleed's "Saudi" Arabia, Christianity is forbidden altogether, without this strange fact causing the slightest of a problem for islam supporters.

It's often alleged that polarizing may feed extremism. Well, could that be part of this too. I.e. extreme leniency against islam combined with extremely derogatory rhetoric about everything "right-wing"/Christian.

Says Klevius, a non-rightwing/non-leftwing* non-believer in "god/gods", but a supporter of Universal Human Negative Rights as opposed to the racist and sexist islamic Sharia that OIC is imposing.

* see Klevius profile

Farming boss Anders Behring Breivik according to The Sun

Sunday, July 17, 2011

News of the World: The real culprit is the Sharia supporting islamist Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud! (and BBC)

According to Independent’s Ian Burrell and Oliver Wright: “The fatal blow appears to have been delivered by the Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, News Corp's second biggest shareholder, who summoned the BBC on to his boa." Klevius comment: BBC (funded by compulsory fees) then more than willingly functioned as a puppet megaphone for this Sharia islamist by day after day filling their news with this propaganda until the desired result was achieved.. 

This islamist extremist guy (i.e. Sharia fanatic) has used Western oil money to buy into media and is now betraying others while trying to get an even better grip!

From Klevius post April 28 2009:

One of the most eager islamist missionaries, Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud (the guy who accused US for 9/11 & offered oil money in "compensation") who probably has functioned as a "goalkeeper" (i.e. he has probably rolled much more money than he has "earned") for washing Saudi oil money into islamofascist "charity" around the world, isn't only the main contributor to the islamization of Harvard but also connected to muslim born Barry Barack Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro's (or whatever) suspicious academic admission to Harvard (via the supremacist fascist organization Nation of islam's Khalid Mansouri - see pic at Mr X's right ear - who has been Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud's legal "advisor" in US). Moreover, this money puppet also supports so called islamic feminism, of which I've warned for more than a decade now.

According to much media reporting it's the "extremist muslims" who ask for Sharia

That alone makes Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud without a doubt an "extremist muslim". And at the same time much of the media try to assure you that the Sharia threat isn't real but "fear mongering". But this same media never comment on the fact that OIC (57 partly or wholly islamized nations) has agreed to abandon Human Rights and to replace them with islamic Sharia. And finally, Sharia is said to differ "only" when it comes to issues such as marriage, custody and other aspects of family matters. However, although there's much more to it, this is the very anti Human Rights soul of islam's evilness, i.e. what I call institutionalized sexist rapetivism. In other words, no matter if Arab feminists (via the approval of their husbands, male family members, dictators etc guardians) get the right to drive (cars, planes, helicopters, buggies or whatever) they will forever be sex segregated out of reach of full Human Rights hence continuing their long islamic tradition of being seen by men as belonging to an other inferior species.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Islamofascist OIC is aiming a deadly blow at UN and Human Rights!

UN and Human Rights were created as a bull-work against totalitarian fascism. The 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration also eliminates discrimination or limiting of freedom on the grounds of sex, world view, religion, lack of religion etc.

Islam(ofascism) about to turn United Nations into the very opposite of its original purpose

After having lost their bid for criminalizing criticims against islam the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Secretary-General Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu from re-islamized Turkey said OIC must have a seat at the United Nations Security Council as the largest world body representing 1.5 Billion muslims.

Klevius comment: Really?! A racist/sexist totalitarian ideology that pronounces itself as the final solution should be given the right to veto everything that doesn't fit the islamic Sharia its member states' leaders have agreed to impose on their citizens (see burning pic above)?!

Historically islam constitutes the by far single worst ideological crime ever against humanity. Everything from slavery to abuse of girls/women and racism against non-muslims is sanctioned by Koran/islam. And during its time islam has produced a record number of victims estimated from over 200 Millions to over one Billion. That PC and Saudi Wahhabi initiated OIC has made their utmost to keep the historical truth about islam as hidden as possible (by offering extremely glorified and false pictures of islam's history) for the average world citizen ought not to be reason enough to reopen the door for totalitarian world fascism.

However, if OIC has 1.5 Billion muslims ONM (Organization of Non-muslims) has 5 Billion members! Shouldn't they have a say in UN against a "religion" that considers ?!

Negative Human Rights for a positive future without islam's Human Rights violations!

The bedrock of bigotry and hypocrisy

When you see the headline below you may well think it's a call for support of heroic freedom fighters such as the African heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali and others. But no, this article vigorously defends the Saudi led worst crime ever against humanity while demonizing and libeling its critics!

Saturday, July 09, 2011

Japan women beat Germany in the world's hardest* sport

* The combination of no hands allowed, extreme individual freedom, 1.5-2 hours play on a 100 m long and 50 m wide pitch. This is also why the rest of the world can't stop laughing when Americans call their rugby "football"! Moreover, there's no difference in rules and gears (except for sport bras of course) whatsoever between women and men (although islam wants to change that of course). You can be a good football player no matter of your size or constitution. The world's best male player, Lionel Messi, is 170 cm (no 2 Christiano Ronaldo is 186 cm)  and the world's best female player, Marta da Silva, is 163 cm (no 2 Birgit Prinz is 179 cm)!

Karima Maruyama's World Cup goal was a real classic when it comes to football technique. Running at high speed towards the side of the goal and then, at the right microsecond,directing a kick just outside the opposite goalpost makes the forward inertia in the ball curving it enough to be out of reach for the goalkeeper while still making its way to the inside of the post.

Klevius question: Is this the real reason why football is by far the most controversial of sports when it comes to female participation? Check out: Did feminists kill the World's best female football team in 1921?

Sexist BBC

While some of the most exciting matches are played in Women's World Cup BBC decides to neglect it all together and instead offers EIGHT HOURS OF F1 RACING added by some golf etc!!! No wonder British girls/women in general don't have a clue about football and are among the most sex segregated in the world. This is then reflected in British men's due attitude towards women. According to many of my Finnish and Swedish female friends who have experienced Britain British men are the most sexist they have ever encountered in the West!

Of all sports a girl can use (many girls don't use any sport at all) to sculpture her future physicsfootball is by far the best.

Monday, July 04, 2011

African idiocy, "black" racism, and islamic hate mongering and sexism

In Klevius' series on how islam destroyed Africa and how Africans themselves try to cover it up by racism against "whites" and Human Rights

Islam is the "religion" of evil and immoral parasitism based on racism and sexism. It's illogical immoral can only be upheld by hypocritical bigots. This is why OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) chose to abandon Universal Human Rights and replace them with racist sexist Sharia. Girls/women are veiled in Sharia  and hindered from marrying non-muslims while muslim men may marry whomever. On top of this comes islam's apostasy ban according to which a muslim leaving islam is considered committing the worst of crimes. This evil formula came into being as an excuse (Allah/Gabriel/Mohammed) for parasitism on slaves and pillaging. Respecting such an evil ideology (as Obama says he does) is a spit on the graves of islam's hundreds of Millions (possibly Billions) victims.

Akurang-Parry (an obscure "thinker" behind Ending the Slavery Blame): "The viewpoint that “Africans” enslaved “Africans” is obfuscating if not troubling. The deployment of “African” in African history tends to coalesce into obscurantist constructions of identities that allow scholars, for instance, to subtly call into question the humanity of “all” Africans. Whenever Asante rulers sold non-Asantes into slavery, they did not construct it in terms of Africans selling fellow Africans. They saw the victims for what they were, for instance, as Akuapems, without categorizing them as fellow Africans. Equally, when Christian Scandinavians and Russians sold war captives to the Islamic people people of the Abbasid Empire, they didn’t think that they were placing fellow Europeans into slavery. This lazy categorizing homogenizes Africans and has become a part of the methodology of African history; not surprisingly, the Western media’s cottage industry on Africa has tapped into it to frame Africans in inchoate generalities allowing the media to describe local crisis in one African state as “African” problem."

Klevius comment: Wasn't it precisely Africans who introduced "Africans" for the racist purpose of blaming "whites" and "Europeans"?! This dumb racist "researcher" is so tendentious and polemical that one easily misses his main flaw, i.e. his bottomless hypocrisy! Can't anyone give the poor guy a mirror?! When Mr X "president" Barry Barack Hussein Mohammad Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) without Congressional consent attacked parts of Libya (not Africa) Gaddafi responded by threatening to attack "European homes, offices and families"! And when "African historians" describe the utter hell caused by islam they rather choose to accuse the "white" "colonialist" who in fact liberated much of Africa from islamic slavery. But by cherry picking the actions of some (often Jewish slave traders expelled from Europe) "Europeans"

Why isn't "white" man David Livingstone, for example, seen as one of Africa's real heroes and liberators? But instead disgusting islam and its disgusting Saudi etc arab "guardians of islam" are glorified for no reason whatsoever!?

Obama and Clinton both have Saudi islamists as their closest "advisers" while the Saudis invade, occupy and torture Bahrains and Yemenites as well as Shia muslims and "infidels" within the Saudi borders! No mentioning of toppling the worst of dictators and hate mongers here!?

This man doesn't deserve any respect as long as he respects islam and the Saudi islamofascists! Obama himself is the best example of islam's deeply rooted Sharia evilness in that he is born muslim due to the fact that his father was a muslim and hence, according to islam, he is either a muslim or an apostate (i.e. the worst of criminals according to islam)!

Socialist support for islam and rapetivism but not for muslims

Guinea's president Alpha Conde abandons his co-citizen and rape victim Nafissatou Diallo and French Socialists applauds Dominique Strauss-Kahn and suggests him as president in France!

Is Nafissatou Diallo a former sex slave (taken by islamist muslims who is now again raped by islam supporting socialists and media? Yes, we do know that she acts like most immigrant muslims without wealth (in islamic countries usually meaning oil money or stolen welfare aid from the West) proper education and jobs. Whoring, drugs and money laundering as well as other crimes and cheating on Western welfare is not only common but the very rule and even sanctioned by the Koran. She was not taught to read or write as a child but rather to chant evil Koran verses. In this respect her upbringing was similar to most girls in Guinea which has a muslim population exceeding 85% and an illitterate rate among girls also exceeding 85% (i.e. again a reflection of islamic heritage from 1400 years of cruel slavery exploitation and genocides).

But this doesn't hinder wealthy Guinean muslims to spit on her when she is raped by a sexist French socialist.
The official spokesperson of the presidential party “Rassemblement du Peuple Guinéen” (RPG), Mrs. Sano Dossou Condé says she doesn't believe Nafissatou Diallo at all and offers her support to Anne Sinclair (the wife of the sexist rapist Dominique Strauss-Kahn):

"I am humiliated today that it is one of my fellow citizens who plays this game. Honestly I do not believe this. I am humiliated today that it is an African woman who adopts an American culture to state publicly that she is raped. I sympathise with the humiliation of Anne Sinclair (the sexist rapist's wife), she is the one who interests me a lot in this affair"

Islam has created a deep ethnic hatred in the Guinean context. And the very same islamic racism and sexism follows muslim immigrants hence contaminating the freedom of Westby the utter aid of OIC.

Guinea's disaster is just one of many islamic atrocities.

Diane Diallo an other chambermaid from Guinea sexually assaulted by a wealthy Qatari muslim protected by French police

Diane Diallo claims, she was sexually assaulted in a hotel room by someone within the circle of the Qatari royal family last year.

"I was on the third floor, in the evening. It was between seven and eight. As I went into the room to clean it, he grabbed me and assaulted me." "After the incident I fled the room and hid in the store cupboard where the head of security found me. They asked me to identify the person from closed circuit television - the cameras were covering the corridors and the lift" "The man had left almost immediately after the attack with his family.""The French police didn't want to do anything." "And they let me know very quickly they wanted me to drop it. I was shocked, in tears. I told them it wasn't right, that because a person is rich and important, he can treat people as he likes. "The police replied, 'Well that's just the way it is!'"
The Qatari "royal muslim" left the country and was never interviewed.

Black racism on top level from the mouth of an allegedly stinking criminal who lives on bribes etc.and now, like Obama, wants to politically utilize racism

Jack Warner (the black guy who was kicked out of FIFA because of his scams) says in front of a chanting crowd in Trinidad: "... no foreigner will come to my country, particularly a WHITE foreigner, and try to harass me, intimidate me and push me around".

Klevius: Btw, have you noticed that the World Cup in women's football is going on? Isn't it strange that in most countries you not only get much info about it but you also need to act almost like a criminal to see any of the matches on a lousy  streaming video. Yes, football is by far the most challenging of sports (no hands) and hence if girls/women learn to manage it it constitutes a real threat against cultural sex segregation.

Silent muslims supporting Al Qaeda and other islamic terrorist organizations

Abigail R. Esman: Islamic terrorist group Al Qaeda’s new leaders are now targeting corporate executives, business leaders, and defense contractors, among others – private citizens, in other words, whom Al Qaeda supporters describe  as “individuals active in the war of the CrusaderZionist on our Umma: directors of companies supporting the war and lying propaganda media organizations and inciting members of Congress With a focus only on the countries most hostile like America, Britain and France.” Yet bizarrely (if predictably), I’m not hearing any Muslim groups – the so-called “moderate” ones, the ones that insist they  want to fight extremist Islam and its hijacking of their religion – speaking out against it, or (for that matter) condemning this latest threat against American private citizens.  Where, for instance, is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)? Where, for instance,  is  Feisal Rauf, the imam who originally planned to lead Cordoba House/Park 51?