Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

UK PM escapes muslim terror induced by her "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Rule Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Friday, July 29, 2011

Politically correct but heavily misleading "science" confuses Africa and Siberia!

For you who don't understand anthropology but are bombarded with misleading "out of Africa" political correctness.

Genetically modern humans evolved in Siberia some 40,000-35,000 years ago. The Western (European) arm of this (hybrid)evolution is genetically known as M173.

Now Guardian reports new "research": "Neanderthals died out in Western Europe after a surge of modern humans arrived from Africa and made them a minority in their own land, researchers claim."

Klevius correction: An extremely misleading sentence (I'm open for the horrifying possibility that this really reflects what the "researchers" reported) keeping in mind the by now well established fact that those modern humans DID NOT come from Africa but from Siberia! See Klevius anthropology blog for an updated and more far reaching analysis of how we came to become "modern"!

I do understand the demand for Africa centrism after islam's 1400 years of total destruction of the continent, mainly through slavery, rapetivism and genocides. However, this fact shouldn't pave the way for biased science, should it.
Africa is by now contaminated with bad/biased tendentious anthropology which eagerly tries to repeat the European mistake from long ago but now as Africa centrism.

So what was it that came "out of Africa" (and later on back to Africa as modern humans)?

This is a possible view of the chimp brained small creature who came "out of Africa"! But he wasn't even close to what we call a modern human

Brain size just slightly more than a modern chimp and a stature just over a meter. We can find physical and genetical remains of her/him in South East Asia as well as in Siberia (Denisova). S/he might have been a product of chimp/Homo hybridization either in the jungle part of Africa or South East Asia. We actually know almost nothing about this because the lack of fossils from jungle areas. Almost all physical anthropology is relying on "easy to pick" findings.

Why were all the pre-Aurignacian Homos so extremely dumb compared to their brain size?!

Yes, there were bigger and more human like creatures tramping around both in Africa and Eurasia but before the Aurignacian* revolution, which started in Eurasia some 32- 35,000 years ago and never touched Africa, the existing cultural remains are on a level not at all comparable with Aurignacian production or the modern human brain.

* Watch up here, dude! Precisely because of the racist European view (among some Europens) more than 100 years ago, the pendulum has now swung back to a political correctness that tries to delete anything that could "offend" non-Europeans. But hey, luckily modern man wasn't born in Europe but in Siberia. S/he only came to inhabit the then fertile European environment! But because of this political correctness the concept 'Aurignacian' has now (by some) been stretched to include non-modern humans from the period just before.

In fact, the Aurignacian explosion was so staggering (see for yourself e.g. the 32,000 year old so called "Lion man" below found in Germany!) that one may seriously ask whether those modern Eurasians were in fact even more intelligent than we are? I for one haven't been able to find equally well made artifacts (not to mention paintings) from the early civilization periods in e.g. Mideast.

Aurignacian art from Europe 32,000 years ago

When the small chimp-human hybrid spread "out of Africa" this was because s/he had a brain better packed than anyone else. As a fertile hybrid s/he managed to breed with bigger (but proportionally dumber) Homos. However, only in the demanding but also rewarding cold climate in the North could the new "bastards" evolve. The "purest" of these "bastards" (Floresiensis-Denisovan-Neanderthal-Homo hybrids) may well have caused a peak in intelligence which later flattened out because of back migration and mixing with not so "pure" Homos. This eventually resulted in the "bastard belt and the global mongoloids on the map below.

Because of our culture and technology we wrongly assume that today's humans are the most intelligent ones. Moreover, just because we possess "sleeping genes" many assume the evolution towards more intelligence is still on. However, nothing could be more wrong because the evoöutionary demand for more intelligence has long since stopped because we are way too many already on the planet. Evolution needs small pockets.

So although Klevius may not be equally intelligent as the Aurignacian stone age wo/man he nonetheless may represent a mild intellectual breeze from the past. Check for yourself on EMAH the even more astonishing hypothesis, and, at the same time, prepare yourself to meet your future master the internet connected AI robot.

The "bastard belt"

Please, don't confuse this "bastard" modern human <30,000 years ago with the "bastard" chimp/Homo hybrid mentioned above. The map is a rough overview of human races before "colonialism" reached the Americas..

Red are mongoloids (i.e. modern humans)
Grey are the bastards (also called "caucasoid")

Btw, could all this also have something to do with the fact that some black men often prefer white/Asian women rather than from their own "race"?!

And of course you already knew that the native Africans were mongoloids (San, Khoisan, "Bushmen" etc) and came from Asia in a genetic back migration after the birth of the modern humans in Siberia.

And of course you knew that islam is creationist and doesn't approve of human evolution, only the rest of nature may have evolved but not the muslim man!

More on why Mideast always has lagged behind and why the first wheeled vehicles came from the north. Plus some stunning examples of Aurignacian early art.

Great Zimbabwe is sub-Saharan Africa's biggest monument of shame

Posting Sept 2008: Peter Klevius is the first one to connect Great Zimbabwe in the south, Mideast islam and the Vikings in the north. Great Zimbabwe emerged out of Bantu slave trade but became "great" precisely because of its connection with Arab islamic slave trade! Although GZ peaked much later than the Vikings it started at the same time. Check for yourself the grim construction of GZ and its river connections to the early East-African Arab islamic mosques! GZ is sub-African greatest symbol of Bantu racism (Africa's aborigines, Pygmies, Khoi- people etc have long before islam been systematically enslaved by black Bantus) aided by Arabian islamofascism!

The "African spring" in the Arab world more than a Millennia ago - An echo of early islam

The upraisal (against their Arab masters) of some 500.000 East-African male slaves more than thousand years ago (taken by islamist muslims in accordance with the teachings of the Koran) in a tiny part of what is now Iraq tells something abt the scale of islamic slavery. Moreover, all indicators point to the fact that slave girls were the most common trade commodity for islam. Also note that most of the so called Portuguese slave traders in Africa were in fact Jews and muslims expelled because of their dirty profession!

Ibn Battuta's islamist voice from the time of early Renaissance*:

* Renaissance was a precursor of Enlightenment as a counter force against islamic slavery/rapetivist Sharia as seen in the northern Italy's (Jewish) interface with Ottoman (Turkish) islamofascism (compare Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice). This development resembles that of the rise of Catholic ruke in Europe as a counter force to islam.

“The cathedral mosque, which was formerly a church greatly venerated by the Greeks, is one of the most beautiful in the world. I bought a Greek slave girl here for forty dinars.”

This is perfectly in line with Klevius analysis of the original and main function of mosques. Ibn Battuta is perhaps one of the best examples of islam's deep hypocritical attitude towards humans. He happily bought, received and abused sex slaves while opposing prostitution etc.,

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Is OIC (Sharia islam) combined with Western silence a (the?) main reason to the Oslo/Norway tragedy?

How many lives and suffering could have been saved in Oslo (and worldwide) if politicians, media and educators had been more open about what islam really stands for (i.e. the very opposite to the very foundation of the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration)  instead of indoctrinating people with Saudi propaganda?

The picture of islam is usually presented by referring to law abiding "ordinary" "peaceful" muslims well suited as members of a free democratic rule of law resting on the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration. However, a completely opposite picture of islam emerges when we look at the dirty and treacherous organization (OIC) that represents ALL the world's muslims.This organization has in effect now denied its member states' citizens their true Human Rights!

See here and here (UN webcast) for youself how islamist countries try to embarrass/silence those very few in UN who dear to criticize this modern anti-Human Rights fascism monster OIC/islam and Sharia.

Why is OIC (the world organization of muslims) desecrating Universal Human Rights?

Roy Brown, immediate past president of the International Humanist and Ethical Union: "It is intolerable that the very values on which UK society is based - human rights, equality and the rule of law - are being undermined by the quiet and insidious application of systems of law that have no basis in equality or justice."

Klevius comment: To fully understand the philosophical power of the basic (negative) rights in the Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948 (a declaration made to ensure global freedom from fascism and totalitarianism for everyone on the planet) your best and deepest analysis is here.

OIC's latest and so far most deadly "achievement" in UN's internal "civil war" between Human Rights and islamic Sharia

OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu (from Turkey) describing the creation of the Independent Permanent Commission on Human Rights (IPCHR): “We have been acting swiftly through an open and credible process in taking concrete steps toward establishing the IPCHR.”

OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu (from Turkey): “The new commission will be totally independent. The 18 human rights experts from 18 different Arab, Asian and African member states will decide their own agenda.”

"Saudi" Arabia (the initiator of the Sharia based Cairo Declaration 1990 and OIC) and Iran could not agree on where the panel would be headquartered. However, Jeddah in "Saudi" Arabia (the place where OIC's headquarter already resides) was eventually decided after Ihsanoglu's persuation (?!).
Saudi delegates allegedly "expressed immense satisfaction". “The OIC Secretariat is in Jeddah, and Jeddah is in Saudi Arabia. According to one delegate: "You can put it in many different ways, but the fact remains that the commission will be headquartered in Saudi Arabia — that is it”.
Klevius comment: Well, this is quite logical, isn't it. The worst Human Rights violator on the planet houses the bomb that blew UN into pieces. And why not move the rest of the UN wreck to Mecca where non-muslims aren't even allowed. That would effectively eliminate islamophobic defenders of Human Rights from disturbing UN.

And here's is muslim born (a muslim born Penis is all taht's needed for a child to become a muslim) Mr X "president" who hasn't committed apostasy as yet (alternatively is a secret muslim) who says he "respects" the worst crime ever against humanity, and who has appointed a muslim Koran reader (a fanatic who has learned the Koran by heart) to represent the US in OIC!

Friday, July 22, 2011

Norway tragedy*: Whoever it was it wasn't peaceful islam or the nice Saudi Sharia "prince"* Alwaleed bin Talal**... or was it?!

* It wasn't ideological terrorism like islamic jihadism but an individual massmurderer.  
** why is a subtly hate mongering son of the world's most disgusting and ruthless dictator families called a "prince"?! And why isn't Saudi Arabia's role in islamic world terror even discussed?! And why is Saudi Arabia allowed to state terrorize Bahrainis etc without any reaction from the world community? And why are children taught that islam has been/is a peaceful religion when the truth is as opposite it could be. And all the non-reported islam connections behind jihadism inspired attacks on non-muslims around the world on a daily basis?!

The Norwegian mass-murderer said he'd got enough of islam propaganda

Could a more balanced view on islam have avoided the Norwegian tragedy?

We are taught it's "islamophobic" to suspect islam or its guardian the Saudi dictator family for inciting terror. We are taught to blink islam's historical atrocities although history easily proves islam as the worst ideological hate crime ever. And we are taught to to blink the ongoing slaughtering raping and intimidation against non-muslims around the world.

This is Alwaleed bin Talal, the Saudi "prince" who has never worked but lives on Western oil money which he uses to incite hatred against non-muslims. He represents the Saudi dictator family in their Sharia effort to take over or crash media, research etc around the world critical of islam. His last target was Murdoch.

The Norwegian connection

First it was allegedly a group called "Helpers of Global Jihad" (Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami) that has taken responsibility for the Norwegian terror. This is the same group as the Stockholm bomber in December 2010.

Then it turned out to be a Norwegian "Oklahoma-bomber" named Anders Behring Breivik.

Klevius comment: Clearly muslim organizations want the "honor" of having done it in the name of islam. However, when it turns out to be a non-muslim behind the terror, then, will we see the same rhetoric as Alwaleed bin Talal used after 9/11, namely that it was the country's own fault?! I.e. in this case that Norway should be more open for the views of whatever, if anything, he represented?! And if it had been a Koran reading muslim we'd been told it got nothing to do with islam. Now when it's a Bible reading Christian we supposedly will be told it got nothing to do with neither of these two extremisms although we know for sure that islam does its best to eliminate Christians around the world with almost no reaction from media and politicians.  And in the very homeland of islam, Alwaleed's "Saudi" Arabia, Christianity is forbidden altogether, without this strange fact causing the slightest of a problem for islam supporters.

It's often alleged that polarizing may feed extremism. Well, could that be part of this too. I.e. extreme leniency against islam combined with extremely derogatory rhetoric about everything "right-wing"/Christian.

Says Klevius, a non-rightwing/non-leftwing* non-believer in "god/gods", but a supporter of Universal Human Negative Rights as opposed to the racist and sexist islamic Sharia that OIC is imposing.

* see Klevius profile

Farming boss Anders Behring Breivik according to The Sun

Sunday, July 17, 2011

News of the World: The real culprit is the Sharia supporting islamist Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud! (and BBC)

According to Independent’s Ian Burrell and Oliver Wright: “The fatal blow appears to have been delivered by the Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, News Corp's second biggest shareholder, who summoned the BBC on to his boa." Klevius comment: BBC (funded by compulsory fees) then more than willingly functioned as a puppet megaphone for this Sharia islamist by day after day filling their news with this propaganda until the desired result was achieved.. 

This islamist extremist guy (i.e. Sharia fanatic) has used Western oil money to buy into media and is now betraying others while trying to get an even better grip!

From Klevius post April 28 2009:

One of the most eager islamist missionaries, Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud (the guy who accused US for 9/11 & offered oil money in "compensation") who probably has functioned as a "goalkeeper" (i.e. he has probably rolled much more money than he has "earned") for washing Saudi oil money into islamofascist "charity" around the world, isn't only the main contributor to the islamization of Harvard but also connected to muslim born Barry Barack Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro's (or whatever) suspicious academic admission to Harvard (via the supremacist fascist organization Nation of islam's Khalid Mansouri - see pic at Mr X's right ear - who has been Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud's legal "advisor" in US). Moreover, this money puppet also supports so called islamic feminism, of which I've warned for more than a decade now.

According to much media reporting it's the "extremist muslims" who ask for Sharia

That alone makes Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud without a doubt an "extremist muslim". And at the same time much of the media try to assure you that the Sharia threat isn't real but "fear mongering". But this same media never comment on the fact that OIC (57 partly or wholly islamized nations) has agreed to abandon Human Rights and to replace them with islamic Sharia. And finally, Sharia is said to differ "only" when it comes to issues such as marriage, custody and other aspects of family matters. However, although there's much more to it, this is the very anti Human Rights soul of islam's evilness, i.e. what I call institutionalized sexist rapetivism. In other words, no matter if Arab feminists (via the approval of their husbands, male family members, dictators etc guardians) get the right to drive (cars, planes, helicopters, buggies or whatever) they will forever be sex segregated out of reach of full Human Rights hence continuing their long islamic tradition of being seen by men as belonging to an other inferior species.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Islamofascist OIC is aiming a deadly blow at UN and Human Rights!

UN and Human Rights were created as a bull-work against totalitarian fascism. The 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration also eliminates discrimination or limiting of freedom on the grounds of sex, world view, religion, lack of religion etc.

Islam(ofascism) about to turn United Nations into the very opposite of its original purpose

After having lost their bid for criminalizing criticims against islam the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Secretary-General Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu from re-islamized Turkey said OIC must have a seat at the United Nations Security Council as the largest world body representing 1.5 Billion muslims.

Klevius comment: Really?! A racist/sexist totalitarian ideology that pronounces itself as the final solution should be given the right to veto everything that doesn't fit the islamic Sharia its member states' leaders have agreed to impose on their citizens (see burning pic above)?!

Historically islam constitutes the by far single worst ideological crime ever against humanity. Everything from slavery to abuse of girls/women and racism against non-muslims is sanctioned by Koran/islam. And during its time islam has produced a record number of victims estimated from over 200 Millions to over one Billion. That PC and Saudi Wahhabi initiated OIC has made their utmost to keep the historical truth about islam as hidden as possible (by offering extremely glorified and false pictures of islam's history) for the average world citizen ought not to be reason enough to reopen the door for totalitarian world fascism.

However, if OIC has 1.5 Billion muslims ONM (Organization of Non-muslims) has 5 Billion members! Shouldn't they have a say in UN against a "religion" that considers ?!

Negative Human Rights for a positive future without islam's Human Rights violations!

The bedrock of bigotry and hypocrisy

When you see the headline below you may well think it's a call for support of heroic freedom fighters such as the African heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali and others. But no, this article vigorously defends the Saudi led worst crime ever against humanity while demonizing and libeling its critics!

Saturday, July 09, 2011

Japan women beat Germany in the world's hardest* sport

* The combination of no hands allowed, extreme individual freedom, 1.5-2 hours play on a 100 m long and 50 m wide pitch. This is also why the rest of the world can't stop laughing when Americans call their rugby "football"! Moreover, there's no difference in rules and gears (except for sport bras of course) whatsoever between women and men (although islam wants to change that of course). You can be a good football player no matter of your size or constitution. The world's best male player, Lionel Messi, is 170 cm (no 2 Christiano Ronaldo is 186 cm)  and the world's best female player, Marta da Silva, is 163 cm (no 2 Birgit Prinz is 179 cm)!

Karima Maruyama's World Cup goal was a real classic when it comes to football technique. Running at high speed towards the side of the goal and then, at the right microsecond,directing a kick just outside the opposite goalpost makes the forward inertia in the ball curving it enough to be out of reach for the goalkeeper while still making its way to the inside of the post.

Klevius question: Is this the real reason why football is by far the most controversial of sports when it comes to female participation? Check out: Did feminists kill the World's best female football team in 1921?

Sexist BBC

While some of the most exciting matches are played in Women's World Cup BBC decides to neglect it all together and instead offers EIGHT HOURS OF F1 RACING added by some golf etc!!! No wonder British girls/women in general don't have a clue about football and are among the most sex segregated in the world. This is then reflected in British men's due attitude towards women. According to many of my Finnish and Swedish female friends who have experienced Britain British men are the most sexist they have ever encountered in the West!

Of all sports a girl can use (many girls don't use any sport at all) to sculpture her future physicsfootball is by far the best.

Monday, July 04, 2011

African idiocy, "black" racism, and islamic hate mongering and sexism

In Klevius' series on how islam destroyed Africa and how Africans themselves try to cover it up by racism against "whites" and Human Rights

Islam is the "religion" of evil and immoral parasitism based on racism and sexism. It's illogical immoral can only be upheld by hypocritical bigots. This is why OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) chose to abandon Universal Human Rights and replace them with racist sexist Sharia. Girls/women are veiled in Sharia  and hindered from marrying non-muslims while muslim men may marry whomever. On top of this comes islam's apostasy ban according to which a muslim leaving islam is considered committing the worst of crimes. This evil formula came into being as an excuse (Allah/Gabriel/Mohammed) for parasitism on slaves and pillaging. Respecting such an evil ideology (as Obama says he does) is a spit on the graves of islam's hundreds of Millions (possibly Billions) victims.

Akurang-Parry (an obscure "thinker" behind Ending the Slavery Blame): "The viewpoint that “Africans” enslaved “Africans” is obfuscating if not troubling. The deployment of “African” in African history tends to coalesce into obscurantist constructions of identities that allow scholars, for instance, to subtly call into question the humanity of “all” Africans. Whenever Asante rulers sold non-Asantes into slavery, they did not construct it in terms of Africans selling fellow Africans. They saw the victims for what they were, for instance, as Akuapems, without categorizing them as fellow Africans. Equally, when Christian Scandinavians and Russians sold war captives to the Islamic people people of the Abbasid Empire, they didn’t think that they were placing fellow Europeans into slavery. This lazy categorizing homogenizes Africans and has become a part of the methodology of African history; not surprisingly, the Western media’s cottage industry on Africa has tapped into it to frame Africans in inchoate generalities allowing the media to describe local crisis in one African state as “African” problem."

Klevius comment: Wasn't it precisely Africans who introduced "Africans" for the racist purpose of blaming "whites" and "Europeans"?! This dumb racist "researcher" is so tendentious and polemical that one easily misses his main flaw, i.e. his bottomless hypocrisy! Can't anyone give the poor guy a mirror?! When Mr X "president" Barry Barack Hussein Mohammad Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) without Congressional consent attacked parts of Libya (not Africa) Gaddafi responded by threatening to attack "European homes, offices and families"! And when "African historians" describe the utter hell caused by islam they rather choose to accuse the "white" "colonialist" who in fact liberated much of Africa from islamic slavery. But by cherry picking the actions of some (often Jewish slave traders expelled from Europe) "Europeans"

Why isn't "white" man David Livingstone, for example, seen as one of Africa's real heroes and liberators? But instead disgusting islam and its disgusting Saudi etc arab "guardians of islam" are glorified for no reason whatsoever!?

Obama and Clinton both have Saudi islamists as their closest "advisers" while the Saudis invade, occupy and torture Bahrains and Yemenites as well as Shia muslims and "infidels" within the Saudi borders! No mentioning of toppling the worst of dictators and hate mongers here!?

This man doesn't deserve any respect as long as he respects islam and the Saudi islamofascists! Obama himself is the best example of islam's deeply rooted Sharia evilness in that he is born muslim due to the fact that his father was a muslim and hence, according to islam, he is either a muslim or an apostate (i.e. the worst of criminals according to islam)!

Socialist support for islam and rapetivism but not for muslims

Guinea's president Alpha Conde abandons his co-citizen and rape victim Nafissatou Diallo and French Socialists applauds Dominique Strauss-Kahn and suggests him as president in France!

Is Nafissatou Diallo a former sex slave (taken by islamist muslims who is now again raped by islam supporting socialists and media? Yes, we do know that she acts like most immigrant muslims without wealth (in islamic countries usually meaning oil money or stolen welfare aid from the West) proper education and jobs. Whoring, drugs and money laundering as well as other crimes and cheating on Western welfare is not only common but the very rule and even sanctioned by the Koran. She was not taught to read or write as a child but rather to chant evil Koran verses. In this respect her upbringing was similar to most girls in Guinea which has a muslim population exceeding 85% and an illitterate rate among girls also exceeding 85% (i.e. again a reflection of islamic heritage from 1400 years of cruel slavery exploitation and genocides).

But this doesn't hinder wealthy Guinean muslims to spit on her when she is raped by a sexist French socialist.
The official spokesperson of the presidential party “Rassemblement du Peuple Guinéen” (RPG), Mrs. Sano Dossou Condé says she doesn't believe Nafissatou Diallo at all and offers her support to Anne Sinclair (the wife of the sexist rapist Dominique Strauss-Kahn):

"I am humiliated today that it is one of my fellow citizens who plays this game. Honestly I do not believe this. I am humiliated today that it is an African woman who adopts an American culture to state publicly that she is raped. I sympathise with the humiliation of Anne Sinclair (the sexist rapist's wife), she is the one who interests me a lot in this affair"

Islam has created a deep ethnic hatred in the Guinean context. And the very same islamic racism and sexism follows muslim immigrants hence contaminating the freedom of Westby the utter aid of OIC.

Guinea's disaster is just one of many islamic atrocities.

Diane Diallo an other chambermaid from Guinea sexually assaulted by a wealthy Qatari muslim protected by French police

Diane Diallo claims, she was sexually assaulted in a hotel room by someone within the circle of the Qatari royal family last year.

"I was on the third floor, in the evening. It was between seven and eight. As I went into the room to clean it, he grabbed me and assaulted me." "After the incident I fled the room and hid in the store cupboard where the head of security found me. They asked me to identify the person from closed circuit television - the cameras were covering the corridors and the lift" "The man had left almost immediately after the attack with his family.""The French police didn't want to do anything." "And they let me know very quickly they wanted me to drop it. I was shocked, in tears. I told them it wasn't right, that because a person is rich and important, he can treat people as he likes. "The police replied, 'Well that's just the way it is!'"
The Qatari "royal muslim" left the country and was never interviewed.

Black racism on top level from the mouth of an allegedly stinking criminal who lives on bribes etc.and now, like Obama, wants to politically utilize racism

Jack Warner (the black guy who was kicked out of FIFA because of his scams) says in front of a chanting crowd in Trinidad: "... no foreigner will come to my country, particularly a WHITE foreigner, and try to harass me, intimidate me and push me around".

Klevius: Btw, have you noticed that the World Cup in women's football is going on? Isn't it strange that in most countries you not only get much info about it but you also need to act almost like a criminal to see any of the matches on a lousy  streaming video. Yes, football is by far the most challenging of sports (no hands) and hence if girls/women learn to manage it it constitutes a real threat against cultural sex segregation.

Silent muslims supporting Al Qaeda and other islamic terrorist organizations

Abigail R. Esman: Islamic terrorist group Al Qaeda’s new leaders are now targeting corporate executives, business leaders, and defense contractors, among others – private citizens, in other words, whom Al Qaeda supporters describe  as “individuals active in the war of the CrusaderZionist on our Umma: directors of companies supporting the war and lying propaganda media organizations and inciting members of Congress With a focus only on the countries most hostile like America, Britain and France.” Yet bizarrely (if predictably), I’m not hearing any Muslim groups – the so-called “moderate” ones, the ones that insist they  want to fight extremist Islam and its hijacking of their religion – speaking out against it, or (for that matter) condemning this latest threat against American private citizens.  Where, for instance, is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)? Where, for instance,  is  Feisal Rauf, the imam who originally planned to lead Cordoba House/Park 51?