Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Swedish library records open for everyone! Mideastern pedophile rapists get 250.000,-! Swedish state media hypocrisy on Bush.
When four "Mideasterners" raped a barely 13 yr old girl they were first freed (see e.g. posting 27, January 2005) and now "awarded" (230.000,-) for "suffering"! And the state media was very silent (also see 3, February 2005 posting with a comparison between Swedeish state pedophilia and the Jackson trial).
Yes, Bush was, of course, wrong abt global warming (as abt gay marriage - see the Terri Schiavo killing and Why can't marry our sibs and grown up kids). But both statements were probably politically, not rationally, motivated (compare Iraq and WMD - Bush couldn't possibly tell the world that it was, in fact, Islam that was the real WMD). But the real hypocrisy is when Swedish state media has continued to make a big "Bush-hating campaign" out of it while simultaneously boosting for stupid and stubborn Swedish "scientists" acccording to whom "nothing is proven abt the human role in climate change" and that "the natural variations are the real culprits" (Volvo is, by the way, a huge polluter because of poor mileage).
And now Sweden, who prides itself with strict anti-drug policies, shall take responsibility for some regions in Afganistan where drug production for the "infidel" market in the West is the main Islamic business. But no problem, Sweden will just shut its eyes and "cooperate" with the drug dealers because "one has to be pragmatic in these countries"!
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Are Bush, Condi and the Marines the free world's only protection against deadly Koran schools and naive Islamist supporters?
Was Nazism/Fascism and the widespread hatred of Jews part of a European ethnicity? And what about the hatred/depreciation of "infidels"/non-believers? But whereas the hatred/desecration of Jews in Europe preceeded Nazism, the racist idea of an "infidel" ethnicity was learnt to the people from Islam. And whereas the Nazis came to power via a democratic process, Islam usually has not, although democracy and human rights now seem to be its main tool for achieving its utopian totalitarianism. Tools that will be destroyed after use!
Somebody really wants to open the Pandora's box with its Islamic content: The Brits are now preparing for a law that in praxis will become the perfect protection and "creeping room" for racist/sexist totalitarian Islam!
In another sense, however, Islam is dramatically different from both Christianity and Judaism. The Judeo-Christian focus is mainly on peace and nonviolence – turning the other cheek. Granted, in practice, our own heritage has had its share of faith-based wars, but in today’s modern world, both Christianity and Judaism can be considered entirely benign. No so Islam – and especially not so the Wahhabi branch of Sunni Islam. The Wahhabis believe that Allah’s organs are physical, and that Allah sits firmly on a ruling throne in Paradise . They take in a literal sense every Qur’anic statement, especially when it relates to warfare, and most particularly to jihad – religious war. In 1818 Wahhabi was nearly defeated and deprived of influence, but the Saudi dynasty breathed new life into the movement in the early 20th century when it drove the Hashemites out of Arabia into the present Jordan. According to a prominent Lebanese Islamic scholar (who remains anonymous for obvious reasons), during the last decade, Saudi Arabia has financed all of the Wahhabi movements in the region either directly or indirectly through non-governmental organizations.
In most of the Islamic world, the Wahhabis control basic schooling.
Wahhabism flourishes in every Muslim country. Lebanon has about 4,000 Wahhabis. In Egypt , Saudi Arabia , and Pakistan it is far larger. Wahhabism goes by many names – Ikhwan, Wahhabi, Salifiyya, Mowahabin, and the Taliban. What all of them have in common is a strident, militant view of Sunni Islam, and financial support at the highest levels of the Saudi government. Osama bin Laden has capitalized on this widespread Wahhabism to unite Muslims across the Islamic world. The movement grows by indoctrinating youngsters in its hatred while ostensibly educating them. It is fueled by massive infusions of Saudi money. And it is legitimized by Fatwas issued almost daily by Islamic clerics throughout the Islamic world.
The system feeds upon itself, and is growing stronger by the day. In recent weeks, Iraqi clerics have begun issuing Fatwas to their local congregations that, in effect, put at risk every non-Islamic person anywhere in the region.
Their message of universal fundamentalist Islamic rule over all Muslims now and over the entire world as soon as possible cannot be ignored if we value our freedom and way of life."
Klevius' comment: Most Westerners (including Westernized Mideasterners etc) naively or deliberately close their eyes to the obvious fact that Islam is aggressively totalitarian and that there doesn't exist any "good" and "peaceful" Islam. What is misinterpreted as "peace" is either the minority-Islam's forced waiting for opportunity or, even worse, a fasade while the "creeping" is already on in the shadows (see postings below abt Sweden from May 31 and June 07, 2005). Also see:
Definition of religion
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Did Bush, Condi and Blair get it right after all?
The real cowardly hypocrites are those who allow these very Islamic jihadists with their Fatwas etc to influence the open and free society and the thoughts of its members, because "Muslims (in general) may feel offended" if Islam is critisized (but non-Muslim "infidels" have to stand a continuous sexist/racist desecration of The Holy 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration)! This is precisely how "Islam in general" (whatever it is, if anything?!) is fertilized by the evil roots of the "real Saudi-Arabic Islam"! Ultimately, of course, there is no real Islam without these evil Islamists, but only a naming useful for political, racist and sexist maneuvering and controlling.
Furthermore, it seems more than ridiculous when supporters (some liberals and many socialists and feminists) of the failing modern social state (also cynically named "welfare state") also support racist/sexist "Islam" (which particular "Islam" anyway?)! It's also an irony that Islamists often lack real attachment to their parents (without a "generation/sex-gap") and hence due real respect for them. This attitude they share with socialists/feminists whose foremost objective has been to destroy kinship. This is then the absolute zero where the social state and Islam find eachother on a state and totalitarian level respectively.
For analysis and solutions see e.g.Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship and Attachment and delinquency
Sunday, June 19, 2005
Corruption in Sweden: "I don't care" says Swedish state prosecutor Christer van der Kwast when his dangerous dog injures 4 yr neighbour girl
Irresponsible detached citizens with lethal weapons out of control: E. g. Christer van der Kwast, official investigator of corruption in Sweden (who got his position via corruption?)!!
The 4 year old girl was playing outside her family house when Christer van der Kwast's wife and dog were walking on the street. When the dog saw the girl it attacked from behind and severely injured the girl for life, especially in the head and face. A police report has been made but according to Expressen Christer van der Kwast says: "I pay no attention to this. It was an accident". He also refuses to destroy the mad dog. When asked if the dog has attacked people before Christer van der Kwast says that he doesn't want to talk with Expressen (a non-socialist news paper). Interestingly Aftonbladet, the other main newspaper (socialist), like other Swedish state media, don't report at all about the poor four year old girl who was fiercly attacked and bitten by a dog without a responsible owner able of taking care of it, or not even bothering about it afterwards!
The modern socio-schizophrenia: Dogs are more important than the safety and right of children to play outside?! Is it because dogs are easier to handle/abuse and that they constitute helpless and stupid substitute mirrors for their owners weird projections and lack of real attachment Also see From Klevius without love! Do we now have a society full of professional "child protectors" but no one who really cares, i.e. children/youth without real attachment to their parents/families!
This tragedy out of indifference, irresposibility and the insensitivity of this Swedish top state official (who allegedly got his position via state corruption and by delivering the right opinioons - see below) describes in a nutshell the problem of detached Swedes discussed in previous postings below. Also compare the totally different history of "Sweden's Condoleezza Rice" Inga-Britt Ahlenius - see Swedish state pedophilia). She got kicked out when she critisized the Swedish state, but found a new top job as a critical srutinizer of the UN. But Susanne Osten, a "Swedish state pedophile" see posting February 24, 2005, was awarded.
Possessing a potentially dangerous or even lethal dog most often signs fear and a lost human being with severe problems with real social attachment to other human beings (see Klevius' paper abt attachment and delinquency in Sweden). This episode hence perfectly symbolizes how the modern social state care abt children!
Christer van der Kwast's Swedish social state (see Angels of Antichrist) career
Although Christer van der Kwast allegedly got his job by freeing Maj-Inger Klingwal (Minister in Göran Persson's government) from accusations of corrupt behavior when she arranged a top apartment outside the normal routines, he is now responsible for investigating corruption in Sweden (sic)! Interestingly he was simultaneously applying for a job that needed the approval of the Swedish government!
Christer van der Kwast and the scandalous Quick affair
This affair is the ultimate example of the Swedish "psycho-corruption" described on several links starting from e.g. Klevius' Psycho-timeline!
The Scandia affair
Christer van der Kwast and the Swedish state media made a huge affair of targeting an "evil" non-state company. The costs and efforts were in no way proportional to the final reult (except, of course, its propaganda value).
The doctoral hat affair - How an "illiterate" prime minister became a "honorary doctor"
When prime minister Göran Persson needed a doctoral hat he used state money to create a university which then "honoured" him with the desired hat (Göran Persson has to my knowledge never performed a university degree). When he, as a consequence, was accused of corruption, his friend Christer van der Kwast, of course, freed him!
Also see the notorious state corruption scandal in Swedish Systembolaget (the huge state monopoly liqujd chain where prime minister Göran Persson's wife sits on the top!)!
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
The totalitarian Arab-Islamists' Swedish "whore"* pays from her own pocket for being raped, abused and humiliated
*Many Islamists consider Western states as "whores".
For a theoretical background for the posting below see
Klevius' definition of religion and a logic that excludes Islamic sexism:
From Klevius without love: Sex, kinship and friendship (non-sex marriage, the Vagina gate and the atom of kinship).
Definition of sex segregation (and feminism).
A marriage guide: Why was Terri Schindler-Schiavo killed and why aren't we allowed to "marry" our sibs and grown up kids?
Tired of being called an "infidel" and/or a "racist" by the real racists/sexists?
Also see Forum Mot Islamisering for Swedish news!
Islam is racist/sexist (and even violent) nationalist Pan-Arabism and every Muslim, by submission, its prophet! How come that we support a fascist movement that in e.g. Sudan reveals its real roots and openly kills/rapes/subjugates in the name of Islam and in front of an Islamic government. Are we Europeans still contaminated by the very same fascist blindness as in the 1930s? And today we also face a child/youth criminality that by far exceeds anything back then (See Klevius page on Attachment and Angels of Antichrist for a background)! The relations between sex segregation/feminism/Islam are briefly outlined on From Klevius without love + links.
Secular/democratic tax payers' money streams to Pan-Arabic** totalitarian Islam and the essentially same Koran-schooling, which continuously brainwashes and wastes the lives of young Islamic suicide killers and their victims in Iraq and elsewhere (not to mention all other Islam-fueled racist/sexist atrocities around the world, we usually hear little about)!
** see e.g. DEMOCRACY AND PAN-ARABISM AS CONTENDING FORCES IN NIGERIA
When Swedish Islamists threatens Lena Hallengren, "minister responsible för religious communities in Sweden" (sic), that if they don't get money from the Swedish state, they ought to get them from wealthy Arab oil-Islamists, she immediately promised to give them money (if not for building mosques, but at least for the "activities" within them and within the Islamists' community). Implied in this was obviously the fact that Arabic money equals evil Wahhabism/Salafism, i.e. the backward ideology of the Middle Ages, popular among lost children/youngsters/weirdies in need of immediate care, and among over-wealthy oil-Arabs dreaming about a worldwide Islamic Pan-Arabism (instead of doing some decent work, or using their money to help the poor without racist/sexist Islamic conditioning. Note that all Islam is sexist - including Muslim feminism!)!
But there's ultimately only one Islam, and that Islam is always totalitarian! Why should Swedish tax payers support a totalitarian Pan-Islamic/Arabic movement? No matter what Islam we talk about, it will always stay in ultimate opposition to the Holy 1948 Universal (negative) Human Rights! And isn't it ridiculous that those very same people who loudly use to shout about "anti-democratic right wing nationalists" at home, equally eagerly now support Oriental fascism and totalitarian Arab-nationalism disguised as a "world religion"! When do we get the same media and other support for the Japanese language and Shintoism, for example (also see e g Honda high tech consumer quality vs BMW low tech "Hip Hop" fake imago)?
What is Islam? (also see Klevius' definition of religion)
The birth of Islam is the birth of the first Arabic state, the purposes of which are uniform and indivisible. Pan-Islamism/Arabism is an all-permeating totalitarian racist/sexist ideology, where state and society have merged into one and where the only distinction made is between believers and nonbelievers/"infidels", and where the fulfillment of Sharia is the mechanism of control.
An example of terrorist breeding in Muslim California: "We are a peace-loving people," said Taj Kahn, of the Islamic Cultural Center. "We have never done anything to violate the laws of the United States, and we don't intend to."
Klevius comment: So everyone who has considered him/herself a Muslim and who has violated or has considered to violate the US law, isn't, by definition, a Muslim? Or...? The reasoning is ridiculous! These "peace-loving", smiling hypocrites might actually be the worst, because they sponge on the violent "jihadists" and lure naive young (and some elderly too) people into the totalitarian movement.
Another example: Mike Tyson declares Islam his faith and thinks Sweden is a great country! Klevius comment: Exactly! Saddam Hussein and his cousins, and other Islamists agree! Sweden is fantastic for sexist/racist/totalitarian Islam! Saddam even wants to be prosecuted in Sweden!
A third example: "We Muslims don't want 'Kafirs' such as Sikh and
Hindu children in this school to mix with our children...If
your children come to this school we will bully you boys
like the way we did to the boy who committed suicide,
and we will make your daughters pregnant and change
them into Islam.' The letter was signed by ‘The Chalvey
Muslim Boys’. To date, there has been no action taken or
an enquiry conducted..."
An individual in the Islamists' Umma lacks all natural rights and responsibilities conditioned in a secular society. The only "right" in Islam is the responsibility to follow Sharia, and violation assumes compulsion from the Islamic authorities and by the political, legal code of Islam. Also Islam does not differentiate between individuals, the state and religion. As a consequence every Muslim is an Islamist and sshould maybe reconsider whether they want to continue with the totalitarian fascists (bin Ladin and the rich Islamo-Arabs who supports the same ideology) or if they, perhaps, should take a closer look at the Holy 1948 UN Universal Human Rights Declaration and also the possibility of gainingreal emancipation for girls and women (and boys/men)!
Oil-fueled totalitarian, sex segregated Arabic Islamism creeps into that very space created by the idea of (negative) Human Rights, and protected by democracies but out of reach for democracy itself. That's, by the way, the Guantanamo-problem in a nut-shell (see Klevius' HR definition)!
A better (and inevitable) alternative
But is the confinement of the principle of life itself (dynamics of freedom) into a collection of disparate thoughts from the Middle Ages, obsessed by sex segregation, and dealing with military/political strategies, conquest and how to coerce people to submission, really what we need in the 21th century?
The worst failure of Islam, however, - besides its racist Arabic totalitarianism - is its total dependency on sex segregation. This latter feature of Islam will inevitably destroy any effort to adapt Islam to modernity (also see From Klevius without love) and Did Bush, Condi and Blair get it right after all?.
Welcome as immigrants to the free world (where you can decide yourself whether you want to continue as sex segregated or not) and leave your yoke where it belongs - in the Middle Ages!
The real desecration!
The totalitarian racist/sexist Islam (and its central concept of "infidels") constitutes a continuous racist/sexist desecration of non-Muslims and the Holy 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights!
WARNING! A peculiar Muslim strategy is to avoid the most evil parts of Islam by proposing "not to debate conflicts but only what one could agree on". This tactics is in fact a sophisticated way of expanding Muslim influence in society without openly revealing the real content of Islam!