Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Friday, October 31, 2008
Thursday, October 30, 2008
The main "mafioso" of today's world (Saudi "king" Abdullah); one of many victims for his hate crime mongering (Linda); one (unofficial) victim of islamic law (Ann Obama Soetoro) & two of his paid islamofascist allies (wahhabist "professor" Ingrid Mattson & NOI islamofascist & Saudi servant Don Warden aka Khalid al-Mansouri.
B. Hussein Obama's tight* connection with the racist supramist movement Nation of Islam which is funded with Saudi/Wahhabi oil money & right now busy mainstreaming itself with Saudi islamofascism.
* He is in fact so tight with NOI & Arab islamofascists that there's little room in Obama's profile for anything else! And all of this mess because people are deceived to believe in "a good islam" that doesn't exist simply because the idea of the original & true totalitarian islam was based solely on what we used to describe as evilness, such as e.g. slavery, rapetivism & genocide!
B. Hussein Obama got a letter of recommendation to Harvard Law School from Percy Sutton (Malcom X's lawyer) who actually didn't know Obama but was asked by the Saudi "adviser" Khalid Al-Mansour (pictured above).
Islamofascism also funds the major part of B. Hussein Obama's commercials which are now, in an extremely undemocratic manner biasing the US voters' view on the candidates.
Even al-Qaeda linked al-Hesbah website strives to counter balance Obama's obvious pro-terrorist connections by claiming "al-Qaeda will have to support McCain", i.e. perfectly in line with the old islamic deception formula!
B. Hussein Obama seems to be a change to the worse, to put it mildly! The US economy fell like a stone the last months of Clinton’s presidency! Who dug it up & cleanced dirt from the table?! Will George W Bush go to to history as one of the best US presidents ever? The only real fault is his alliance with the Saudi islamofascists, who now try to abuse US military power to hit Iran, hence leaving the Saudis with direct connection (via Paki ISI) to the only islamic nukes so far!
ULFA, an Assam (Eastern India bordering islamofascist Bangladesh) islamofascist terror-organization linked to Pakistan’s intelligence branch ISI (a known receiver of Saudi oil money in a similar way as the talibans) has today committed a string of Koranic murderings. This is just one example of what Obama's "change" really stands for & directly or indirectly supports!
BTW, the extremely dangerous idea “that religion is universal and that all religions are the same”, ought to be firmly challenged because this is actually the same as welcoming totalitarian fascism such as e.g. islam!
The islamofascist Saudis are also busy destroying evidence of islam's archeological past while, at the same time, abusing UN for the purpose of making all criticism of islam criminal!
Islam's a joke - a very tragicomic & dangerous one!
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
A glimmer of B. Hussein Obama’s character
Why do women vote for Obama? Would they equally eagerly have voted for his friend & mentor Khalid al-Mansour aka Don Warden, the "American" muslim lawyer of the Saudi islamofascists?
Although B. (stands for either U.S. Barry or Arabic/islamic Barack) Hussein Obama's most racist voters are "blacks" his "success" rides on a mass of ignorant &/or naive "white" voters, mostly women (isn't it an irony when you know that islam is the most women hostile of all ideologies). But at least those "whites" have proven to be much less racist than those "blacks" who vote for Obama (in fact, it's a little bit heroic today to be an American "black" who doesn't vote for Obama). Sadly, however, it is precisely in the shadow of this racism that islamofascism takes over. And this time it seems that US is even more fertile than Europe. And the main channel for Saudi boosted Wahhabi islamofascism in US is Nation of Islam the racist black supramist movement which is tightly surrounding B. Hussein Obama in all aspects of his life, beginning with the violent hate crime org. Black Panthers' initiator mentioned above & ending with his racist wife.
Islam makes Barack Hussein Obama an enemy of the American constitution** because he has never abandoned (i.e. committed open apostasy) his "muslim faith"* which states that islam, not the US constitution should rule in questions of freedom for women etc! You can't be a true muslim while simultaneously accepting the U.S. constitution, i.e. the cradle of freedom! Also remember the back cover of Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources (which is probably the world's first serious effort to analyse needs and demands in the interface between civilized & "un-civilized" cultures) which states that "The concept of freedom is, like diamonds, created under pressure"!
* according to islam a born muslim is always a muslim (other option being death/expulsion). Moreover, a born muslim may lie if it helps islam! That Obama only says he "respects" (sic) islam is logical in the context of a US pres. race!
** As an islamofascist constitutional lawyer B. Hussein Obama will probably make his best as a president to change the US constitution so it fits islam rather than freedom!
Monday, October 13, 2008
When US Barry, who became islamic Barack, is US first muslim president, Osama bin Laden counts his second home run
IS ISLAMIC BORN BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA THE FINAL BLOW TO US & ITS CONSTITUTION?*
*Islam's totalitarian world view, apostasy ban, indisputable Koranic sanction of slavery, sexist rapetivism/sex segregation, racist infidel dehumanization, etc etc seem to have little in common with the ideals written down in the constitution of the US! The basis for Barack Hussein Obama's impeachment case may also include the deliberate hiding of facts surrounding his birth, his faith, his citizenship, his terrorist and/or racist friends, and his unwillingness to openly abandon or embrace islam!
An insight to Obama’s capability for balanced judgement may come from his "mentor" and "spiritual adviser" for 20 years, Jeremiah Wright's words: “God damn America! USA started AIDS virus to kill black men"!
From Osama bin Laden's point of view a born muslim is probably to prefer as a US president than an infidel (for those who don't know it, in the ideology of islam 'infidel' refers to those who aren't fully human, and hence legal to kill, subjugate, enslave, rape etc). That Obama Hussein Obama may not fulfill the criterion of a perfect muslim is most likely a lesser issue.
Arab-American B. Hussein Obama is descended from islamic slave owners and slave traders, so he has no "slave blood" himself. B. Hussein Obama changed his first name from Barry to the Arabic Barack after being influenced by black separatists and after he, in 1981, went to Pakistan. Klevius comment: B. Hussein Obama's islamic upbringing in different schools & mosques etc in Indonesia, didn't manage to change his first name. However, like, for example, the San Francisco Taliban John Walker Lindh (who was actually born the same year), Obama was around 20 when his islamization really kicked off with his Pakistan trip, eventually erasing his only American trait!
Is it OK to be a nazist, i.e. to believe in the ideology of national-socialsm? And how does this relation exactly differ from the ideology of islam and those who believe in the islamic ideology? Islam has certainly not caused less killings, pain & suffering! And islam has certainly a much more clearly expressed oral & written ideology demanding acts of killings, torturing, rapetivism etc than has national-socialism (check out their party programme & compare it to Koran etc!
Obama has clearly stated that he won't hesitate to attack targets in, e.g. Pakistan, with nukes if necessary. That hasn't made him popular over there but as you know, internal fighting has always been the trade mark of islamic societies. In 2004 Obama also said: “There’s not much of a difference between my position on Iraq and George Bush’s position at this stage.”
Klevius islam lesson of today: According to Humphrey J. Fisher “Another interesting comment I've come across is that there were regions in black Africa that Muslim missionaries wouldn't go into. The reason is that if those blacks became Muslim, they could no longer enslave them. So, the Muslims banned spreading the word of Islam among certain black tribes. It was from these tribes that local Muslim rulers would harvest slaves, and sell them throughout the Islamic world.” Klevius comment: Se Klevius original islam formula!
Klevius history lesson of today: The power of racism. No matter what Obama stands for as long as he isn’t “white”! And “whites” naively feed & support the very same racism they (without any reasön*) feel guilt for!
* Racism isn’t in your genes as Obama’s close allies Nation of Islam preaches. Nor is it in a general “white”, “black” or colored culture distinguished by skin appearance. The fact that islamists preferred white sex slave girls (from e.g. Europe) hence triggering an enormous reaction that led not only to the rebirth of Christianity, the inquisition, crusades etc, but also, in extension, to the development that made “Westerners” technologically superior – until a non-“Western” & non-“white” Japanese culture (as a reaction to Euro-American threats & pressure – i.e. what caused the Meji restauration) took over the tech lead in the world (see also Shinto meets islam) shouldn't be taken as a reason for boosting that very same evil islam.
BTW, if you hear of any islamic "golden age" in history, be sure it was not only lubricated by slavery, but completely dependent on it.
Saudi "guardians of islam" are now busy finishing a thorough destruction of islam's extremely dirty history while simultaneously abusing UN for the purpose of criminalizing critical study of islam!
Totalitarian islamofascism is now, perhaps not surprisingly defended/protected by the same nations that used to defend/protect national fascism!
Fjordman: The European Union, the Council of Europe and numerous Islamic organizations are working hard to rewrite European school textbooks in order to promote Islam. In the European Parliament, the German Christian Democrat Hans-Gert Pöttering has stated that textbooks should be reviewed for intolerant depictions of Islam to ensure that they don’t propagate “prejudice.” He suggested that the EU should co-operate with the Organization of the Islamic Conference to create a textbook review committee. The OIC desires to rewrite textbooks around the world to remove anything critical of Islam, silence mentioning of the victims of 1400 years of Islamic Jihad and glorify the achievements of “Islamic civilization.”
Friday, October 10, 2008
Obama is Swahili for the Arabic name Osama, and Swahili is the traditional islamic slave trade language of East Africa! So when Obama is cowardly hiding his islamic past (& present?) even his last name is symbolically revealing! Islam's anti-freedom creed is precisely the evil the US founders had in mind when writing the US constitution!
(Above) Saudi "king" (his "kingdom" was made possible through grim islamic date plantation slavery in the area of Riyadh, and the cooperation with the founder of Wahhabism, one of the worst forms of islam) Abdullah & one of the many victims for his hate mongering Wahhabi islam propaganda via oil-money. The Saudis & Co stole the Arabian desert by the help of some 20 criminals and now spread islamic hate racism/sexism worldwide by the help of the oil "Westerners" found/drilled/and paid for! As you know islam is impotent of producing anything except new islamists (rapetivism) - see e.g. Shinto meets islam. Today Saudis & co (OIC) are busy buying influence in UN for the purpose of MAKING CRITICISM OF ISLAM (the worst crime ever) A CRIMINAL ACT! WAKE UP YOU IGNORANT MORONS OUT THERE!
Why is islam always excused from its evil consequences? Islam never freed slaves. It islamized them! And the more "original" you go the clearer islam's slavery/rapetivism root! And islam's bloodthirsty, endless demand for eunuchs, sex slave girls, plantation slaves & slave jihadists fed by looted booty!
Hugh Kennedy: ”Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement”
THE LOGIC OF THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.
On behalf of today's and historical victims of Islam (in Darfur and globally), and on behalf of all humans who feel offended by the tenets/acts of Islam. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights it opposes?!
* i.e. 1400 years of slavery/rapetivism/genocides
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!
AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters don't admit that the Koran is completely wrong in a non-totalitarian world, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of Islam, i.e. as many new Muslims as possible.
Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!
That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!
The victims of Islam often reveal the same lojalty conflict as allegedly do victims of child abuse. However, some don't.
Ehsan Jami (a young Dutch politician): "People think I am a radical. They think I hate Muslims, but ... it is the ideology which is the problem and not the people themselves."
So why isn't the human rightsphobia we call Islam globally criminalized and indicted, and how come that many a "democracy" seem to care more abt islamofascist terrorists than supporting the war on islamofascist terror?! And why are we supposed to ask islamist imams, professors etc for advice?! It's like asking Goring how to deal with Hitler and his terrorist youth! The likely answer: "Don't question, criticize or mess with us but support us!"