People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights. Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis

In the 8 October 2016 Sana'a (Yemen) funeral bombing by Saudi Arabia 155 people were killed and at least 525 more wounded when two airstrikes, about three to eight minutes apart, hit the packed Al Kubra hall. US and UK happy with the Saudis investigating it.

This Swedish muslim MP wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

BBC squeezes in Eng-land cricket in every news report - while UK-land plays borderless Brexit - and football is divided in four UK-lands, Welsh, English, Irish and Scottish players, and two top leagues with whatever players!? Confusing? Not even close to the "British" measuring decaphobia. English isn't "British", it belongs to the world. British stands for imperialism, colonialism, slavery and cooperation with islamofascists.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Islam is the problem - China is the solution.

If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!

* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!

Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC  News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?

Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome.

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.

As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.

Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Top emitters

Top emitters

Peter Klevius evolution formula

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad.
However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.
UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China. Klevius: How come that islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc. 'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China, which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!
UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.

If you don't like Klevius (very few do) you may check if it's him or the anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration you can't digest - but which Klevius stubbornly keeps feeding you.

Iran, Corbyn, bin Laden's son etc. - it's more about protecting BBC's poster boy, war criminal and state terrorist Mohammad Salman, than protecting people on the streets from Saudi exported racist islamic hate terror.

Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?

The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.

Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

Do you support Human Rights or sharia?
Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR. For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.

UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Listen to this Viking about the danger of religion
Martina Big (aka Malaika Kubwa) wanted to be "black". We don't know exactly why. However, fair skinned politicians and media people who support black supremacism, Nation of Islam etc. might consider following her example.

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against the people

Politicians against the people

Rule Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

UK PM escapes muslim terror induced by her "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Sunday, September 27, 2009

"Pathological symbiosis" between state & "faith": Sweden puts the definite stop for homeschooling & instead offers psycho school & islam curriculum!

According to Klevius research the failure of modern school system is caused by:

1 psycholization (although psychology is an impossible science our kids have become its most popular guinea pigs & the school its main laboratory - and we pay for it!)
2 statelization (while attachment to parents are crushed poor peer relations are thriving & the curriculum is filled with non sense at best & state/faith propaganda at worst).
3 sexualization (many schools, in fact, function as brothels where the boys are supplied with sex while the girls think it's a necessary deal to get through the sex apartheid barrier). Comes handy for islamic jihadist schooled boys!

Recommended essential Klevius reading before you continue:

Where the Law Ends the Tyranny Begins 1993 (only available in Swedish)
Children & the Arbitrariness of Authorities 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Daughters of the Social State 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state 1996. The most important sociology paper written in the last century? What do YOU think, dude? Think!
"Pathological Symbiosis" in LVU - Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence 2004. Apart from being possibly the only good scientific work on the origin of the concept also an astonishing example of how democracy is sidestepped by state bureaucracy.
From Freud to bin Laden 2004
Klevius Psychosocial Freud Timeline 2004
What is Sex Segregation & feminism, really? 2004

Islamic globalization - Saudi Abdullah & Co behind the spread of racist/sexist islamic hate mongering around the globe!

Klevius Sweden report: Background to the proposal that will definitely stop free homeschooling in Sweden.

When racist muslim school aged youth attack cemetary staff, visitors & graves,it reflects not "homeschooled" racism but madrassa & imam schooled "infidel" racism rooted in the evil Origin of islam.

Sweden has made a pact with Satan, um, Saudi finanzed islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) which means that islam is now expanding in the Swedish curriculum while homeschooling is forbidden. Already now non-muslim Swedish students have to "learn" abt islam via hypocritical imam lies sponsored by Saudi Arabia, starve during Ramadan, be raped & bullied as "infidels" via child/youth jihadists etc. This happens while Saudi Arabia (together with 56 other islamist countries), the most intolerant country in the world, works hard via UN to criminalize the truth abt islam. continues.


In 1723 Swedish parents were stipulated to teach their kids reading. In 1842 school attendance became obligatory although it was still possible to homeschool if the authorities (the church) checked it up. In 1924 Sweden got its first social (welfare) state law accessing all children. One of its consequences was that Astrid Lindgren (world famous author of Pippi Longstocking etc children's books) as a pregnant 18 year old single mother had to escape to Denmark for not loosing her child ( see e.g. Klevius' Angels of Antichrist, possibly the most important sociological paper from the last century - judge for yourself. However, due to its lack of Mideastern monotheist ideology, its criticism of sex segregation, its criticism of much psykology/psychiatry & its criticism of feminism, few can survive its reading without suffering dimming brain rage).

Few modern schools are capable of educating children without the assistance of homeschoolers

The school system of today already rests on partial homeschooling. Behind almost every successful student there is a supporting home where the crucial teaching and support occur.

Myths & facts abt homeschooling

Homeschooling is often accused for the loss of social interaction with peers. However, peer interaction may well be more of a problem than an asset’ simply because peers are in general equally immature. Peer-oriented children are also often more difficult to parent and teach. and often fail to integrate into society. At least while they are young. It's a troublesome fact that most criminality in Sweden is performed by children/youth. Moreover, when occasionally some of them are caught by the police (after often costly chases) nothing can be done because of their age. This catch 22 is pure child neglect from the side of the social state.

Modern school evolved from a need to basic reading/writing to an institution where to keep the kids while the parents worked. Soon it became obvious that the state could use this splendid opportunity for brainwashing the kids. It\s important to distinguish between a healthy and human attachment to the surrounding society, and the indoctrination of religious or political views.

The center for peer orientation is now the school and the street, while the teachers are hiding.

Pathological symbiosis vs attachment

The most common argument against homeschooling is, in fact, its most convincing defense. Homeschooled children are usually (on a US scale up to 83% compared to 23%) more mature, more socially adept, and better prepared for higher education.
No wonder homeschooled students are allegedly favored applicants of many universities. Homeschooling may hence be seen as the balancing cure to the lack of healthy parental attachment, and as a protection against unhealthy peer attachment.
However, as shown by Peter Klevius in his thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” the Swedish “social state” has managed to keep its dirty foster child trafficking outside the scope of the European Human Riughts Convention by hiding under the legal term “margin of appreciation” (see Klevius’ Angels of Antichrist 1996 & Pathological Symbiosis 2004).

Although the Swedish state now (again*) wants to use the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as an excuse for completely denying the rights of homeschoolers, the text in the Swedish child abduction, um, protection act LVU (Act Containing Special Regulations Concerning the Care of Young Persons) – now including[5] the term “pathological symbiosis” – stays in an obvious opposition to the view expressed in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (see Klevius Pathological Symbiosis).

* As I described in Angels of Antichrist (1996) the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was a creation of mostly socialist Swedish women who had set up the "Save the Children" organization a few years before the world's first general child protection law in 1924.

“Pathological Symbiosis” is, as already the name implies, an oxymoron. A “pathological symbiosis” is per definition parasitic, i.e. the very opposite to symbiosis. In the thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” Klevius has, as possibly the first ever, carefully traced not only the dim roots of this peculiar term but also its murky adaptation and implementation as a handy tool for robbing children. In fact, “pathological symbiosis” is a smear campaign against parental attachment, and in Sweden frequently used as a last resort for kidnapping children from parents (usually a mother) who the (usually female) welfare officer happenms to dislike (or if she has a standing order for such a child / remember that most child abductions in Sweden used to be targeting nice and unproblematic kids, i.e. what is termed on subjective grounds (see e.g. Hessle’s 1997 comparison Japan-Sweden).
Research on homeschooling reveals a number of strengths.

The cultivation and preservation of the child-parent attachment leads to considerably less delingquncy and youth criminality (Sweden has among the worst child criminality paired with perhaps the worst & most costly public school compared to e.g. their neighbour Finland which used to be in the educational top with Japan which, in turn, use to have the lowest child/youth criminality & one of the cheapest school systems). By the stealthy introduction of murky child “protection” criterions such as, for example, ”pathological symbiosis” the social state effectively contradicts the best interest of the child, by eroding parent-child attachment, not only among those targeted by the social authorities but also in general because of the widespread attitude that follows and makes parents even more reluctant to take responsibility for their kids.

A healthy attachment to the surrounding society

Parental attachment has since long been known as the most significant protector against criminality and destructive behavior.

It may also be noted that it’s pure and unfounded Utopian naivity to assume that a fictitious “soul” of the nation or society can be dictated via the schools. Life is inevitably moving and that’s the whole meaning of living . That’s why the world’s most popular toy is round (sorry American “football” and rugby fans). Attachment is the primary mechanism of cultural transmission. This is why segregation is so dangerous, no matter if it is Islamic ghettos or street gangs.
It’s a well known fact that almost all homeschooled chidren are openminded and kind towards other. To an extent that representatives for the totalitarian social state machinery actually proposes this as a weakness because the homeschooled children have to face the unhealthy children the school system has created.

Individuation- a psychological/psychiatric confusion

As shown/discussed by Klevius (1981, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2004 etc) the so called individuation process has in child psychiatry been made upside down. The baby human ought to be seen as what it is, namely an extremely egoistic individual who then, hopefully, gets rid of its state of individuation by learning to attach with others. The baby suckling the mother is a symbiotic relation between two individuals who have extremely little in common.
Unsupervised attachments to peers undermines the development of empathy. This may be beneficial from a cold business perspective but less so from a human point of view. The womb for human warmth is to be found at home, and it doesn’t have to be even female. Only an individual who is fully attached with society can perform a truly democratic opinion based on the idea of Negative Human Rights.

The Swedish proposal to definitely ban homeschooling

As noted in Angels of Antichrist 1996 the Swedish compulsory school attendancy (instead of compulsory education) already hinders most homeschooling efforts, and effectively gathers the Swedish kids into a trap for almost random abduction.

According to the proposal the possibility to fullfil compulsory school attendancy in some other way remains. This is clearly not true because "religious and philosophical reasons" are now no longer accepted. This is, however, well in line with the ECHR decision Konrad & others vs Germany, which many, including the homeschool organization ROHUS seem to have missed completely. This despite information given to their "judicial expert" by Klevius both in writing and orally!?

Apart from this it's also proposed that instead of the previous writing "special reasons" ("sarskilda skal") it should now be "extraordinarely reasons" ("synnerliga skal"). Moreover, this possibility should, according to the proposal, be used "very restrictivly".

Konrad & others vs Germany

"The Court observes in this respect that there appears to be no
consensus among the Contracting States with regard to compulsory
attendance of primary schools. While some countries permit home
education, other States provide for compulsory attendance of its State or
private schools.. In the present case, the Court notes that the German authorities and courts have carefully reasoned their decisions and mainly stressed the fact
that not only the acquisition of knowledge, but also the integration into and
first experience with society are important goals in primary school
education. The German courts found that those objectives cannot be equally
met by home education even if it allowed children to acquire the same
standard of knowledge as provided for by primary school education..
The Court considers this presumption as not being erroneous and as falling
within the Contracting States' margin of appreciation which they enjoy in
setting up and interpreting rules for their education systems."

Klevius comment: It is within this "margin of appreciation" racist, sexist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, anti human rights islam will thrive together with social state fascism (compare the Swedish LVU child "protection" act), while Negative Human Rights of the individual are squeezed away!

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Klevius vs Obama in Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test

Dear reader, check out for yourself if you think these proposed answers from Obama are in accordance with what he himself has said/acted! If not, pls let me know & I'll change them.

What's the difference between Peter Klevius & Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) according to Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test?

1 Do you favor equal rights and treatment of women and men?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

2 Do you oppose stoning of women accused of adultery?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

3 Do you favor mandatory education of girls everywhere?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

4 Do you oppose slavery and child prostitution?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

5 Do you support complete freedom of expression and the press?
No, because I hate stupid people who criticize islam

6 Do you support the right of an individual to worship in her chosen religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): A tricky one. I was born to a muslim father & adopted by another muslim, & I haven’t committed open apostasy as yet neither have I admitted being technically a muslim in accordance with that very same islam I do respect.

7 Do you oppose government- and mosque-supported anti-Semitic publications, radio, TV and textbooks?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

8 Do you oppose the wearing of burqas in public places, schools and courts?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No

9 Do you oppose segregation of the sexes in public places and houses of worship?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

10 Do you oppose the death penalty for non-Muslims and Muslims who convert to another religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

11 Do you oppose “honor” killings?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

12 Do you oppose female genital mutilation?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I love Indonesia.

13 Do you oppose forced sexual relations?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

14 Do you oppose discrimination against homosexuals?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Just a little.

15 Do you support the right to criticize religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & hate islamophobes.

16 Do you oppose polygamy?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam.

17 Do you oppose child marriage, forced or otherwise?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

18 Do you oppose the quranic mandate to kill non-Muslims and apostates?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): This is a misinterpretation of the holy Koran. In classical Arabic (i.e. when the Arabs, as the last people on the peninsula, learned to write) it simply means that you should kill unclean dogs & pigs!

19 Do you oppose the addition of sharia courts to your country’s legal system?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & Ingrid Matson.

20 Do you disagree with the quran which asserts the superiority of Islam to all other religions?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Not at all! Islam IS all religions!

In conclusion Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) scored well in line with his islamic roots, although not at all in line with the U.S. Constitution!

Peter Klevius, on the other hand, miserably failed this test as a 100% islamophobe.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Evil islamic slave trade/raids to India spread much like the plague

Klevius IQ turbocharged history lesson on the origin of India's islamization

As you hopefully already know (by reading Klevius non-religious, non-biased & unsponsored analysis, e.g. Origin of islam, instead of relying on the extremely distorted picture served to you by supporters/representatives/naive collaborators of the worst crime ever against humanity!) the original ideology of islam is based on slavery/rapetivism/Sharia confinement/apostasy ban. The attraction of islam lays in sex segregation, i.e. Koran's sanctioning of (infidel)racism (meaning you can "morally" justify your immoral deeds), (rapetivism)sexism (up to four wives for the maximum reproduction of new muslims + as many infidel sex slaves you like or can "possess with your right hand").

Simply put, islam is built on male sex hunger (HSA*) & Koran/Sharia hinders girls/women from escaping it. Western Human Rights gives female human beings a free choice, & this is why islamic countries have come up with their Cairo declaration on "islamic human rights", now boosted by UN which was initially created for hindering precisely such kind of fascism! And Mr X US "president" (a born muslim who hasn't dared to either confirm he is a muslim or confirm his apostasy, hence being the true opposite to the US constitution of freedom) "respects" this evil "faith" & bows its evil hate mongering representatives. Remember, evilness doesn't become less evil just because so many support it. And also remember, islam can never be democratically elected precisely because islam is AGAINST democracy! And saying you are a racist when criticizing a half black man for his lies is just another angle of evil political correctness in the wake of Western oil money. Everything evil in islam is "translated" to something "positive" no matter if it's slavery, sex slave polygamy or infidel racism.

* HSA (male biased heterosexual attraction) heavily confuses women because it's often hard to distinguish from cultural sex segregation. As a consequence many women feel obliged to perform more heterosex than they would as truly free (emancipated) beings. They are trapped like those poor slaves who were gathered in Great Zimbabwe before they were transported to the muslim/Arabic Zwahili coast mosques (from A Roots Guide 2006)!

With the above in mind you may now consider how inherently parasitic islam came to utilize old trade routes for a purely parasitic Sharia finance based onj slave trade/raids. You may have been brainwashed to think that "because slavery was common all over the place Koranic/islamic slavery wasn't an issue to bother abt. But, in fact, the opposite is true. Koran sanctions slavery, slavery in the muslim world (the slave world) never stopped before it was forced to stop by Western Enlightenment & the idea of Negative Human Rights, islamic sex segregation is absolute & sees women/girls as sex slaves confined within Sharia & apostasy ban with no right of their own to choose a non/muslim man or even to have normal contact with "infidel" men (down to such trivial things as handshaking etc). Muslim females are seen as belonging to a non/human species according to Koran/islam.

When early muslim Arab slave traders sat in their dows & let the wind transport them to Kerala, Ceylon etc. they initiated a grim parasitic alliance with powerful locals who then made slave business by catching & selling out their own (poor) people, or buying African slaves from the Swahili area etc. As a consequence of these practices the powerful Indians often converted to islam out of greed whereas the poor did it out of fear. As a result you got different castes of muslims while still having access to an endless amount of potential "infidel" slaves on the Indian sub continent (just like in Africa & elsewhere where islamic Sharia slave finance had spread). Because of the share size of India's population, islamic slave trading/rading there would be more than enough to render islam the title of the worst crime ever against humanity.

Quite the opposite to what you might have been taught the "Arabs" who created evil islam were extremely "primitive" compared to the surrounding civilizations. As Mohammed is alleged to have said: "The most unprofitable thing that eats up the wealth of a believer is building". This statement by the alleged founder of islam is in 100% agreement with Klevius analysis of islam as a purely parasitic ideology! So the PC agitation of "Arabs" as contributers to development is a double mistake. A thief with a jewellers collection ought not to be called a jeweller!

Unfortunately the eager finger pointing (boosted by an inferiority complex which was also caused by islam!) against West, true history research has been almost stalled in most universities & replaced with islam.

The rajputs were such muslim slave masters who combined it with violent military style slave raiding! It's striking how well the big & longlasting (until the Brits) Indian development crunch fits with the chronology of islam's enslavement of India. Just as in the case of Africa as Klevius has pointed out in the still unpublished A Roots Guide & partly on Klevius web pages/blogs.

In fact, many awful customs can be traced to islam, directly or indirectly, even the worst variants of the caste system!

BTW & speaking abt how evil islam abuses its opposite, i.e. Negative Human Rights, for its thugs & their jihadist deeds! During Ramadan islamic police in islamic countries use to arrest even more non/muslims than usually, whereas in Western democracies the Western police is asked not to arrest almost any muslim thugs during Ramadan, although they rarely do at other times either!

Friday, September 11, 2009

Muslim* Mr X** "president"*** (Barry, Barack, Hussein, Dunham, Obama, Soetoro, or whatever) - an accomplice to islamic terror!

Shrine of Democracy or shrine of islam?

*Born muslim & later adopted muslim
**No one knows for sure his background
***His "presidency" is to spit in the face of the U.S. constitution. He is a born muslim who hasn't sworn himself free from his muslimhood. By not having done that he avoids violating the worst crime known to islam, i.e. apostasy (i.e. leaving islam) but simultaneously he violates the U.S. constitution because islam is its very opposite, namely AGAINST, not for, freedom! A TRUE muslim can never participate in a Democratic election because islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) sees itself as superior to everything else! A true muslim vote/representation is therefore a vote/representation AGAINST democracy.

This is the man who leads the pack that has used the original islam for offending, assaulting, murdering & raping around the globe. This is also the same man Mr X "president" bows so deeply for, and the very same racist/sexist ideology he "respects"!

Wahhabism, Salafism, Qutbism etc, are all anchored in the origin of islam, which is simply medievcal Sharia finance based on slavery, rapetivism & apostasy ban.

Abd al-Wahhab: "If a person believes that a non-Muslim might go to heaven, he has become an apostate; if someone believes that it is all right to befriend or support or assist or ally oneself with infidels, he has become an apostate."

Klevius comment: We see it all the time. Islam never befriends or supports or assists or allies itself without gaining from it on the behalf of someone else! This is the inevitable destiny for a parasitic ideology. This is also why islam has NEVER made ANY scintific or technological progress. Everything that is positively ascribed to islam sooner or later turns out to be traceable to civilized people who were colonized by islam. Just check history!

Daily Times editorial 29 Aug 2009: Karachi city is actually the most dangerous city in Pakistan as far as possible violent reaction to textbooks is concerned. The madrassas (mostly Saudi funded - Klevius comment) in the city — officially 1,000; unofficially 3,000 — have the capacity to attack and kill.

Humans are weak, that’s why islamic racism (i.e. infidel racism)/sexism (i.e. rapetivism) is so appealing.

It's bottomless stupidity/ignorance not to realize that islam IS its own beginning! Moreover, by neglecting (not to say respecting) the true nature of islam one contributes to islamic terror worldwide.

In memory of known & forgotten victims of islam

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Islam is the world's fastest vanishing "faith" thanks to muslim islamophobia

The spectra of factual "religious" islamic fascism & totalitarianism is indeed wide although the origin/base is extremely narrow.

Most westernized muslims fear the true teachings in the Koran. They therefore try to distance themselves from the original true islam.

By defining the recognition of the by far worst* single** ideological crime throughout history as a "phobia" one simultaneously defines a majority of muslims as islamophobes, simply because of their "moderation" i.e. their distancing themselves from these basic & original Koranic tenets.

* Counted in suffering & deaths. Although the early illiterate jihadists (incl. Muhammed) weren't able to leave any reliable records abt their crimes, the surrounding civilizations did record their atrocities to some extent. Later on there is even more evidence for a movement (islam from 'silm', meaning compromise, or avoidance of conflict, i.e. what you usually do at gun point) that first violently & later culturally (& violently) sponged on others, mainly through slavery (incl sex slavery), i.e. the origin of islamic Sharia finance. The estimates of the costs of islam's slavery through 1400 yrs vary considerably but even the lowest ones are more than enough for legitimizing the award title above.

** "Islamic diversity" is, of course, also an oxymoron. Rape victims, victims of conventional slavery (due to the amount of slaves islam IS 'conventional' slavery) & those in racist dhimmitude under islamic Sharia, may express a variety of"diverse" reactions to their submission under islamic totalitarian fascism. However, islam's basic tenets are simplistic racist infidel despise (now in the form of calling them "islamophobes") & sexist rapetivism (treating females as a different & segregated species in line with sex slavery for the purpose of sexually satisfying muslim males & culturally satifying islam's need of more muslims).