Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
According to Turkish PM Erdogan, "islamophobes" (you know, those of us who are worried about OIC/islam's grave, deliberate and open islamic Sharia violation of Human Rights - the so called Cairo declaration masterminded by Saudi dictatorship) are equally dangerous as islamist terrorists! An other Turk, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, leads the Saudi founded OIC (headquarter in Jeddah/Saudi Arabia). Right now this Saudi/Turkey led Sharia organization seeks to transform the European Human Rights Convention to make room for islamic Human Rights violations, especially against women.
Klevius comment: Al Qaeda seems to operate quite frequently inside the US by the help of US citizens. How else would you explain all the muslim islamic terrorist attacks already performed on US soil during the Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama regime, as well as the fact that FBI is able to infiltrate muslim terrorist quarters posing as al Qaeda-linked accomplices. I mean, this clearly indicates that the presence of al Qaeda on US soil is no surprise neither to FBI nor to muslim terrorist wannabees. And yes, Erdogan says he promotes a "secular islamism" but that really doesn't mean anything as long as islam itself (i.e. the racist/sexist difference between Human Rights and Sharia) is involved.
Decapitating the US by the help of Sharia and al Qaeda
AFP: A US follower of al Qaeda (Rezwan Ferdaus) was arrested Wednesday on charges of planning to fly explosive-packed, remote controlled airplanes into the Pentagon and the US Capitol, authorities said. Rezwan Ferdaus, 26, was arrested and charged with the aerial bombing plot to attack Washington and attempts to deliver bomb-making materials for use against US troops in Iraq, US Attorney Carmen Ortiz said in Boston. “The conduct alleged today shows that Mr. Ferdaus had long planned to commit violent acts against our country, including attacks on the Pentagon and our nation’s Capitol,” Ortiz said. During the alleged plot, undercover FBI agents posed as al Qaeda-linked accomplices who supplied Ferdaus with one remote-controlled plane, C4 explosives, and small arms that he allegedly envisioned using in a simultaneous ground assault in Washington. The plan, according to the criminal complaint, was to strike the Pentagon and the Capitol’s famous white dome and “decapitate the entire empire".
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
“While I stand by my opposition to the interference of shariah law into the American legal system, I remain humble and contrite for any statements I have made that might have caused offense to Muslim Americans and their friends,” he said in the statement. “I am truly sorry for any comments that may have betrayed my commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the freedom of religion guaranteed by it.”
Klevius comment: Also consider the undeniable and horrifying fact that OIC has adopted islamist Sharia as the basis for the constitutions of their member states, and that, in doing so, it violates the most central tenets of those very Human Rights that were agreed on as a bull-work against totalitarian fascisms. Unlike Human Rights islamic Sharia is ALWAYS racist and sexist by its very nature and origin.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Is there a statistical stupidity among muslims that benefits racist/sexist islam (the worst hate crime ever)?
1,282 cc for the average brain size of sub-Saharan Africans, as compared with 1,367 cc for Europeans and 1,416 cc for East Asians.
Lynn regards these genetic clusters as "races." He concludes that the East Asians—Chinese, Japanese and Koreans—have the highest mean IQ at 105. Europeans follow with an IQ of 100. Some ways below these are the Inuit or Eskimos (IQ 91), South East Asians (IQ 87), Native American Indians (IQ 87), Pacific Islanders (IQ 85), South Asians and North Africans (IQ 84). Well below these come the sub-Saharan Africans (IQ 67) followed by the Australian Aborigines (IQ 62).
The lowest scoring are the Bushmen of the Kalahari Desert together with the Pygmies of the Congo rain forests (IQ 54).
Klevius comment: But a much more important angle has to do with oil rich Arab islamist hate mongers who deliberately utilize a "third world" inferiority complex.
Sunday, September 25, 2011
BBC's senseless misrepresentation of the world's most intolerant dictator sounds every bit as Goebbel's state propaganda. Hey, Saudi Arabia happens to be the world's most intolerant, racist and sexist nation. And why shouldn't it. It's after all the guardian of the worst crime ever committed against humanity. And if BBC doesn't believe Klevius why not send a team over investigating women's freedom. And while you're there you could also check the Saudi enslavement of "infidels" etc etc etc etc. I mean, you are, after all, overly compensated/sponsored by the compulsory fees and taxes of those you deliberately cheat, aren't you.
Moreover, this man (Mr X "president" Obama's, or whatever, first call, btw) who for long has led islamic racist/sexist hate mongering throughout the world, is the master mind over OIC and its deliberate Human Rights violation, the so called Cairo declaration on islamic "human rights" (Sharia) which, among other creepy things, clearly states that women ought to be subordinated muslim men.
Thursday, September 22, 2011
What if Troy Davis had been white and the police black etc?!
Some facts about this hate crime criminal Troy Davis: Michael Cooper was shot in the face, Troy Davis was at the scene. MacPhail is shot and killed and once again Troy Davis is at the scene. A black man, a high school drop out with a rap sheet hanging around with other men with rap sheets. Michael Cooper was shot in his face, and Troy Davis was there again. Homeless Larry Young was assaulted and whipped with a pistol, and Troy Davis was there. When white policeman Mark MacPhail tried to stop the assault/whipping he was shooten by the same gun that was used against Michael Cooper above, and cowardice Troy Davis was of course there. Do I need to mention that policeman Mark MacPhail did not use any weapon! Later the crime lab tests proved that the shell casings recovered from the shooting of Michael Cooper were fired from the same weapon as the casings recovered from the scene of Officer Mark MacPhail's murder.
Klevius question: How many others had this scum of human kind, Troy Davis, intimidated, assaulted, raped, murdered etc before he was eventualy sentenced?!
Shame on you blacks who support racism!
If you want to know the real causes of black criminality (i.e. that part of black criminality that exceeds "normal"/average crime rates) you need some heavy education in sex segregation by Klevius. Read! But I can hint that it's got to do with black families on average being much more sex segregated (this is also why racist/sexist islam is so popular among many blacks). Due to sex segregation mothers/grand mothers can't understand boys, and due to that very sex segregation black makes escape their responsibilities. In the US one might describe it as from slavery to sexist gospelism to ultra sexist Nation of Islamism/Saudi islamism.
Saturday, September 17, 2011
for a background read Out of Africa as primitive pygmies and back as modern humans!
"Homo" Floresiensis was a small apelike creature that existed as late as 12,000 years ago, and possibly up to modern times. S/he had a brain size less than half a litre yet managed to create and use tools similar to what Homos with double or triple the brain size did. She was found/described in muslim Indonesia by Australians (Peter Brown et al) where the chief muslim anthropologist Teuku Jakob immediately started an unbelievable campaign (supported by some Western morons) to 1) "explain" the skeleton as a "sick human", and 2) to remove (steal) and partially destroy (removing possible DNA etc) it. Why? Simply because, according to ALL forms of islam there is only one ready made human species and this was created by the Arabic Allah. So when some islamist tries to tell you that islamaccepts evolution this is absolutely not true when it comes to humans! These kinds of treacherous lies aimed to make a medieval evil racist/sexist fascist ideology (in fact, the by far worst crime ever) look modern are extremely common among islam preachers/supporters.
Klevius question: Isn't it racist to assume that Africans can't take the fact that modern humans didn't originate in Africa?!
Due to a combination of prejudice and political correctness (and some racism among African centered anthropologists) the Out-of-Africa myth keeps going on despite reality begs to differ. So Klevius bragging about being the first to discover that modern humans evolved in the cold north and that what we call Homos have very little to do with modern humans (there was a vast diversty among Homo/Chimp and Homo/"Homo" hybrids but only in the northern cold did it result in modern humans), lacks some credibility in the sense that this was no real discovery but in fact quite obvious. Just as so much else Klevius has bragged about. As, for example, the worrisome fact that OIC's Sharia declaration is a real violation and threat to the Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948 which was aimed to hinder the rise of precisely this kind of racist/sexist totalitarianism that islam has represented for 1400 years and which has destroyed/enslaved the whole African continent and which has made islam the by far, worst ideological hate crime ever.
Chris Stringer: Thus our restudy of the Iwo Eleru cranium confirms previously noted archaic cranial shape aspects, and the U-series age estimates on its skeleton support the previously proposed terminal Pleistocene date for this burial. Our findings also support suggestions of deep population substructure in Africa and a complex evolutionary process for the origin of modern humans , , , , , , . Perhaps most importantly, our analysis highlights the dearth of hominin finds from West Africa, and underscores our real lack of knowledge of human evolution in that region, as well as others. As also indicated by restudy of the Ishango (Congo) fossils , Later Stone Age fossils from at least two regions of Africa retain significant archaic aspects in their skeletons. We hope that the next stage of this research will extend studies to the Iwo Eleru mandible and postcrania, and to comparative materials such as those from Ishango. Dienekes (as many other anthropologists) has eventually started questioning the Out of Africa myth just as Klevius has done since 1992 (in Demand for Resources) and 2003 (on Internet as the "Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids" theory).
In a comment today Dienekes writes: "The core of the Out of Africa orthodoxy is that (1) the proto-Eurasians are a subset of Africans (2) all modern humans have common origins diverging from the single emergence of the same species, and (3) there were modern humans in African before they were anywhere else. 1) This can also be viewed as Africans being a superset of Eurasians, which could have also come about if Africans are the union of a Eurasian-like population and archaic Africans. 2) This seems likely, due to the obvious homogeneity of modern humans relative to other fossil humans and the two published archaic genomes. But, that really does not establish Out of Africa, only recent common descent. 3) Possibly. I would like to see a quantitative characterization of Omo I, as I mention in my other post, because the priority case seems to depend entirely on this find. Moreover, the African record does not match expectations of the naive Out of Africa story. Were are all the modern humans in Africa after Omo I and before Hofmeyr? It seems to me that there has been a rush to tie Omo I to the story of our origins. Sure Omo I is definitely modern-leaning in its appearance, but there is no evidence of modern behavior, and apparently whatever population it was part of co-existed with more archaic humans even in east Africa (Herto/LH18) long after. So, I see no reason, at present, to suppose that the expansion that established the relative homogeneity of our species in the Upper Paleolithic had anything to do with it. In short, I don't know where H. sapiens in the strict sense (like living humans) originated. Perhaps in a green Sahara, perhaps in the Persian Gulf oasis, perhaps in some yet to be identified locality of Africa or Eurasia."
Klevius comment:"Perhaps in a green Sahara, perhaps in the Persian Gulf oasis, perhaps in some yet to be identified locality of Africa or Eurasia". What?! No mentioning of the most obvious place, Siberia and Europe?! Despite the fact that:
1) genetics places the birth of the modern human here in mid-Siberia
2) that Aurignacian culture (which was the first (starting some 35,000 years ago - but beware of those Aurignacian definitions which want to extend it to Mideast etc where such art/tools, in fact, didn't exist at the time!) to produce really human art and technologies, and which didn't exist in Africa or Mideast) is a European Siberian product.
32,000 year old depiction of horses in what is now France (no dude, they weren't made by "Africans" or "Europeans" simply because those weren't around in any meaningful sense).
The Aurignacian 'Lion man' found in what is now Germany is 32,000 years old
A four meter Aurignacian painting from France that is some five times older than the oldest Mideast "civilizations"!
3) that remains related to Melanesians (Denisovians), Neanderthals and modern Humans are found in mid-Siberia dating just before the modern human appeared at the same spot
Moreover, as a natural consequence of the above it's no surprise that we also find the earliest use of wheels and wagons etc technology in Europe
and the world's earliest pottery etc in Japan where the Eastern branch of early modern humans ended before entering the Americas
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Sweden's fall to Sharia: State radio broadcasts death threats against apostates and the Parliament and the King family bow for a fanatic Sharia imam!
Islamic hate crimes and OIC's Sharia racism/sexism violate the very core of Human Rights, but ignorance and corrupt politicians applaud the destruction of Human Rights and the spread of the islamic caliphate
Linda met for her unknown muslim Somalis but it was never labelled a hate crime, why!?
A Somali imam (in Sweden and with Swedish citizenship) calls for the murdering of apostates in Sweden (Somalis gone Christian) through public service broadcaster Sveriges Radio (SR) without any action from th establishment, while the only party that has the courage to criticize islam and its imams in Sweden, Sverigedemokraterna, are heavily bullied by other poiticians, media etc.
Although the Somali imam violated the Swedish law with respect to: Freedom of/from religion, death threat, hate speech and intolerance, respect for the Swedish state and its secular democracy etc, no reaction! What if it had been someone else? The program has now eventually been reported (by Christians) for hate speech. The police report was filed by Erik Johansson, at the Swedish Evangelical Mission (Evangeliska Fosterlands-Stiftelsen - EFS), after he was told about the imam's words underlining every muslim's responsibility to kill anyone who leaves islam.
"I received a call from my Somali friends who had heard the programme. I don't speak the language myself and when they explained to me, I concluded that this wasn't a message which should be on an SR channel," Erik Johansson told The Local on Thursday.
Johansson also contacted Sveriges Radio in order to register his dismay that the item was left available on their website for more than two weeks. Soon after his telephone call the programme was removed from the website.
In a comment to the Christian website Dagen on Tuesday, SR International head Ingemar Löfgren said that he decided to pull the transcript from SR's website pending receipt of an official translation, pointing out that he is responsible for several channels broadcast in languages which he does not speak.
"If an imam calls for other Muslims to kill converts, then we have a journalistic responsibility... If he didn't get any follow up questions then we have failed in our journalistic responsibility," he said.
Othman Al Tawalbeh, a Swedish Sharia fanatic (eight years of Sharia studies) will preach in front of the Swedish Parliament and King on the opening of the fall season
The Swedish Church hired (sic) Othman Al-Tawalbeh to work with "interreligious dialogue" (read, the spreading of islam).
However, according to Arab newspapers, Al Tawalbeh is an apostate, someone who has left "the only true faith".
The source is the leader of Swedish Muslims, Mahmoud Aldebe, who caused headlines in 2006 when he, in turn, was advocating Sharia laws in Sweden.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
What is ”moderate” islam? Is it a “moderately” racist/sexist Sharia?! "Moderate islam" in Libya and "non-moderate islam" in Turkey both violate Human Rights!
The ongoing desperate effort to free islam from its evil self reflects islam's very origin. Since sex segregated sexism is the root formula and main stream of Judaism it should surprise no one that its main tributaries, Christianity and islam, share the same basic ideology and differ markedly from other religions/philosophies outside the "Judeo-Christian heritage" (btw, much of Hindu sexist segregation is a product of islamic slavery occupation/colonization).
Although, as many times pointed out by Klevius, early Christians constituted a protest movement against marriage sexism and for the liberation of women from womanhood and compulsory sex (rapetivism), institutionalized Church Christianity (Catholicism) reinstalled ultra-sexism.
The schism between Christian and non-Christian Jews (Talmud/Mishna to Gemara, approxim. 200-500 CE) led to Jewish matrilineality as a means of definition of being a Jew. However, when Arabized Jews (some of who worshiped Jesus, i.e. MHMD) instead did the very opposite they realized that the Penis rule was a much more efficient means for gaining power, especially with the help of young illiterate Bedouin males, i.e. what was to become islamic jihadism and "holy war", and codified in Koran and Sharia long after the alleged Mohammed's alleged death.
Btw, the popularity of Jewish sexism was so great that it possibly even influenced the personal pronouns of both Semitic and Indo-European languages, which both groups seem to be the only main ones linguistically segregating between the sexes in this respect (compare e.g. Finnish third person singular hän which in English is divided in s/he). In other languages this is extremely rare if not non-existing. And the reason the previously non-sexist Indo-Europeans were contaminated was because they met in Mideast.
So when islam today utilizes people's racist/sexist tendencies it shouldn't surprise anyone that previously as moderately sexist Jewish circles again get inspired to revitalize its original sexism. And, in fact, a stream of ultra-sexist vibes from such Jewish communities have recently reached Klevius' ears. The most sexist parts of the "Judeo-Christian tradition" again surfaces while the most evil part of it, islam, tries to hide its ugly past (and now) behind an artificial mask of "peaceful and rightful faith".
Mustafa Abdul Jalil, chairman of Libya’s national transitional council: Islamic sharia law should be the main source of legislation. We are a Muslim people, for a moderate Islam.
Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Turkey is not a country where moderate Islam prevails.
and some other schizophrenic statements:
2004: No religion permits terrorism. Therefore, it is very ugly to put the word Islam before terrorism. You may say religious terrorist but you can't say Islamic terrorist.
The word Islam is uninflected, it is only Islam. If you say moderate Islam, then an alternative is created,and that is immoderate Islam. As a Muslim, I can't accept such a concept. Islam rejects extreme concepts. I am not an extreme Muslim. We are Muslims who have found a middle road.
2006: Malaysia's former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad echoes Erdoğan: There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim. We are fundamentalists in Malaysia. We follow the true teachings of the religion and the true teachings do not teach us to bomb and kill people without reason.
2007: Erdoğan responded to massive secularist marches on the streets of Turkey by arguing that religion and secularism are not in conflict. "It would be a mistake to pit secularism against Islam. I am a secularist, in the sense that I am defending a secular state." He also observed that the demonstrators carried banners "No to a military coup, no to Sharia law," and indicated that his government fully shares those views.
2007: Erdoğan on the term "moderate Islam," often used in the West to describe his AK Party: "These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam."
2008: The Turkish army chief of staff, Yaşar Büyükanıt, rejects any reference to "moderate Islam" concerning Turkey."How do we define the U.S.? Shall we call it Christian? This is not possible. "
2009: Speaking on the "Alliance of Civilizations and Turkey's role" at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies on April 2, Erdoğan again rejected the idea that Turkey represents moderate Islam. "Islam cannot be classified as moderate or not."
(timeline borrowed from Daniel Pipes)
Sunday, September 11, 2011
A 1400 year old iceberg steered by Al-Qaeda and the OIC caliphate towards the rape of the Statue of Liberty
Klevius history question: Have muslims murdered/killed more muslims than slaves/other infidels during 1400 years?
the very heart of UN's Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948. The war on terror is, in fact, a war against the islamist caliphate OIC. However, following islamist tradition OIC offered “peace” in dhimmitude. Albeit a “peace” that would not touch most of islam’s jihadists because those muslim born pious Koran readers are termed “un-islamic” or "extremists" and hence outside the deal, while "academic" jihadists are blinked.
Muslims murdering muslims
There is a strong tradition among muslims to murder/eliminate competitors. The islamic fairy tales has it that already soon after the alleged Mohammed's alleged death 632 his successors killed/eliminated each other quite frequently. Some of this bloodshed is still going on e.g. between Shia (Iran and its accomplices) and Sunni (Saudi Arabia and its accomplices) muslims.
Islamic sex segregation
Sex segregation is the very essence of islamic parasitism, and because sex segregation is lacking in the true original Human Rights Declaration this constituted the main reason why OIC had to officially abandon Human Rights and replace them with islamist Sharia. Islamic sex segregation supports muslim males not only by offering jihadists and ordinary muslims sex on demand (i.e. what we in the West use to call rape) but also the duty/responsibility of a muslim's wife to physically and culturally reproduce more muslims, despite the fact that the children belong to the muslim male.
Mohammed had, according to islamic fairy tales (Koran, Hadiths etc) at least 9 wives but didn't manage to produce a single adult son. This seems suspiciously as an excuse for hindering the tracing of the, in fact, non-existing Mohammed (see e.g. K-H Ohlig et al 2008/The Hidden Origin of Islam), well in line with the long term and thorough Saudi/Wahhabi campaign of destroying archeological evidence of islamic atrocities.
Immediately after the islamic murdering of thousands it was assumed that 9/11 was launched by at least one state. And this assumption was spot on. It was the islamic caliphate steered from Saudi Arabia and OIC. However, due to dhimmitude every truth was put upside down. Islam became a "religion of peace and tolerance" and the muslim terrorists from Saudi Arabia became "non-muskim extremist". And those who didn't follow this new dhimmitude language game became "islamophobes".
Should Klevius or islam be indicted?
Do you really support the idea that Klevius should be sentenced for telling the truth about islam?! And if so, what kind of moral do you really defend?! And what about all the lies about islam that are sprayed over us from media and state minarets!
You Westernized muslim ignorant about islam's real origin and heart, take a look at the Second Global Conference on World'sReligions after 9/11! This is just one step in a long row of OIC strategies to force Sharia on YOU! I.e. robbing you of that very freedom you longed for in the first place.
Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Islam is the (hate) crime, its supporters are accomplices, and OIC's Sharia is its deliberate Human Rights violation
A Google search on 'islam oic human rights sharia' places Klevius again at the top. Is it a reasonable search about the state of the world at the 10th Anniversary of 9/11, and if it is, why doesn't Klevius get more competition? Judge for yourself. Islam and OIC (57 states with muslim populations) are practically the same and OIC's main contribution to the world has been its adoption of Sharia (1990 Cairo Declaration) for the purpose of neglecting/violating basic Human Rights. So why is non-sponsored and non-commercial Klevius at the top? Could it be islam schizophrenia, i.e. the troublesome confusion among muslims who, at 9/11, for the first time saw the true face of their "faith"? Some muslims applauded it as jihadic defense of true original islam and other muslims condemned it as completely unislamic?!
Nigerian islam schizophrenia - the blood traces go the wole way back to OIC and Saudi Arabia.
Kolawole Akinwande: Former President Obasanjo is talking out of experience in the sense that he was once at the receiving end when fire of “Sharianisation” was sweeping across some states in the North. He was actually tempted into reacting to the contrary and had he countered the moves made (overtly and covertly) by the Sharia mongers, the country would have been thrown into a state of anarchy.
Undoubtedly, there are backers prodding Boko Haram in its intensification. There are two main groups made up of known and unknown personality in this country. While the first group is not far-fetched, the other is faceless and considered more lethal. The two have delight in what is taking place--enforcement of the spread of Sharia without hindrance. For this reason, the two cannot come into the open to join the bandwagon of those condemning acts of the killings in the name of Islam.
Those that top the list of the first group are governors (past and present) in those states where Sharia had been imposed on their citizens. Members of Supreme Council on Sharia and all those who have spoken in support of its introduction right from inception in the year 1999 (into 2000) cannot exonerate themselves from tacit support. Discussions on the subject matter in both print and electronic media stand as testimonies and those who aligned themselves with clarion call are there to be fished out. Another very powerful group comprises of some Imams in the North. In the last presidential elections, some of them turned themselves into campaign managers for politicians. They were reported as warning the electorate that voting for Jonathan was voting against Islam .
In November 1989, three years after throwing Nigeria into the orbit of Arab world via the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC), the facilitator (former military President Ibrahim Babangida) organised a conference in Abuja made up of 24 African countries. The group gathered under the title “Islam in Africa Organisation” (IOA) and at the end of the gathering, one of Nigerian delegates was so elated and was credited as saying “We are ready to go to any length to get SHARIA established in this country (Nigeria) whether we are alive or dead.”
In the light of foregoing, President Jonathan should not be deluded into believing that members of the Boko Haram are the only menace in the present scheme of things. They are mere puppets in the hands of some forces that are after the downfall and subjugation of this country.
It will not be easy in dislodging the sect because of the indoctrination already- ingrained in them and some other Muslims on the border-line. They have been brain-washed to regard Christians as infidels/unbelievers (Kafris) and as such, they are enemies of Islam. This is what OIC imparted in its members as far back as 1971. In a six-point resolution, they were directed to deal decisively with Christians in their fields of endeavour.
Reprimand therefore awaits any Muslim who dares to point out any member of Boko Haram. Outright elimination is hanging like sword of “Damocles” ‘on those who have aversion to the atrocities going on around them.
Klevius comment: Compare this to what's going on in the US.While the introduction of islamic Sharia intensifies, so does the media propaganda that calls Sharia warnings "hysteria", "islamophobia" etc!
Believe you me, it's islam that's the problem. And mainly so because of the desperate denial going on.
Friday, September 02, 2011
The Saudi dictator family is the main source of islamist hate crimes around the world today.
The Saudi flag carries the bloodthirsty "sword of islam".
CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations) founder Ahmad is the very same person who on the Obama pic to the left awards another stealthy islamofascist, Muzzammil Hassan, the founder and head of Bridges TV, aimed to show Americans the "true peaceful nature of islam", but istead ended up in its opposite, namely to reveal Hassan's (and islam's) double nature. When Hassan's wife demanded divorce that very islam that Bridges TV said didn't exist, emerged as the original islam when Hassan stabbed his wife 29 times and then finished the process by fullfilling the islamic Sharia ritual of beheading the infidel.
This man reflects his own and his former supporters' bigotry and hypocrisy in a way that doesn't differ from how islam itself (the worst ideological crime ever) is treated by its fascist supporters/accomplices.