Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
This woman is crying for money from mainly white taxpayers under the title "funding for the Legacy Commission, which commemorates the white's abolition of slavery (and the white's black liberation fight against islamic/Arabic slave masters who continued their dirty slavery-faith even after the abolition!)".
Liberal Democrat black Councillor Shirley Brown called Asian Conservative Jay Jethwa a “coconut” during a debate at Bristol City Council in England in February 2009. The term coconut is used to accuse someone of betraying their race or culture by implying that, like a coconut, they are brown on the outside but white on the inside.”
Background: The Bristol Legacy Commission, that was set up to support black and “ethnic” (usually muslim – the world’s largest “minority” group) minority people has been condemned as "a pointless spending spree" and has "squandered" its funding on "pet projects and jollies". Councillor Jay Jethwa had supported a proposal to cease funding the body, arguing that as an immigrant herself she had not needed such help. And according to Councillor Richard Eddy, said: "The Legacy Commission's report is nothing more than a shameless exercise in self-justification. "After commemorating Abolition 200 in 2007, Bristol ought to be tackling the problems of the present for the sake of all its citizens, rather than wallowing in self-indulgent hand-wringing over the past. "Instead, the Legacy Commission is continuing to squander over £250,000 a year on promoting division, subsidising politically-correct pet projects and funding jollies to the Gambia. "At the budget-fixing meeting in February, Conservative councillors sought to re-direct this scandalous waste of money towards protecting worthwhile frontline services but were defeated by Labour and the Lib Dems. "Over the last three years, over £1 million has been frittered away on this pointless spending spree and I am appalled to see that it is proposed to build this into the base budget from 2010/11."
Klevius comment: This is primarily a disgusting insult on the "white" culture that rescued Africa from islamic slavery! However, this aspect was never tried, as wasn't the fact that Jay Jethwa is rooted in Gujarat (India) a place slaughtered and enslaved by islam.
As you know if you have followed Klevius writings, islam originated as a moral excuse (they're infidels & we're chosen by god) for slave trade and slave jihad. This excuse was implemented by Malik long after the death of the alleged Mohammed figure who didn't even exist outside islamic fairy tales (Hugh Kennedy 2009).
The deliberate slavery formula we now call islam started affecting Africa, India etc already in the seventh century. Long before the West-African muslims started supplying labour slaves to the cotton plantations of the American-south, and many centuries before the first Kunta Kintes were caught and sold by muslim Africans and brought ashore to the sugar estates of Brazil and the Caribbean, Africans were being sold as slaves by the muslim Arab traders from the Eastern seaboard of Africa to Hindu Indian princes on the West Coast and Central India.
European travelers like Ludovico di Varthema in the 15th century reported that Gujaratis were deprived of their kingdom by muslims because of their kind heartedness: " …a certain race which eats nothing that has blood, never kills any living things… and these people are neither moors nor heathens… if they were baptized, they would all be saved by the virtue of their works, for they never do to others what they would not do unto them."
Jay Jethwa's husband (together with whom she has created an awarded Gujarat food shop in Bristol, England) is rooted in East-Africa, i.e. the very Swahililand that was one of the main sources of islam's enormous slave raiding/trading throughout some 1400 yrs!
Thursday, June 24, 2010
This is the typical naive & ignorant islam excuse! But triple so shocking when coming from an African woman!
Has "Abena in Africa" ever tried to educate herself abt Africa's history? Yes, I know! She was probably too busy consuming the PC "Western" "colonialism" so she missed the 1400 years of Arabic/islamic slave trading/raiding/genocides that has left Africa as the most backward continent (unless she thinks it's somehow in the genes of black African people)! Islam ties girls /women to their biological sex via "duties" & "responsibilities" as it's described in OIC's Cairo Declaration on "human rights" (in fact Sharia). But denying a human being her freedom because of her sex is just the very opposite to the original Human Rights Declaration from 1948!
Asma Halimi, a female reporter from Competition, was slapped in the face by Rafik Saifi of Algeria after his team lost 1-0 to the USA in the World Cup
"The problem begins when a man strikes a woman because she's a woman and usually weaker so he can vent his personal frustrations." says one commentator.
Klevius comment: No, the problem begins when we segregate girls/women from boys/men! It's called sex segregation (see the web's two best pages to make you understand what it's really abt: What's sex segregation and From Klevius without love). Doesn't the phrase "a woman is usually weaker" sound so stupid & illogical that only a mind heavily doped with sex segregation can utter it without realising it!
Rafik Saifi was planning to marry a French woman but didn't want it known. He revealed it in a Qatari interview but hoped it wouldn't break the language barrier (btw, much in islam is kept in a veil made out of Arabic, out of reach for most infidels!). However, Asma Halimi translated the interview. This may also be connected to the islamic fact that al Qaida-linked Salafists in Algeria
have killed and kidnapped hundreds of "French collaborators". These true muslims won the last democratic election in Algeria by the help of morons such as "Abena in Africa"! And, as you know, even if the dictatorship hadn't prevented the result, islam itself should have taken care of that because true islam is Sharia & leaves no room for other democratic means than getting into power through rapetivism (also compare how the Germans democratically supported Hitler in two consequtive elections!).
Klevius advice to "Abena in Africa": Educate yourself abt the Holy Negative Human Rights! Then you know why islam is useless, other than for evil purposes, in a free modern world!
Saturday, June 19, 2010
and the true face of islam
and a muslim footballer (Nicolas Anelka) who calls his non-muslim (infidel) coach "a dirty (non-muslim) son of a whore"
Another muslim footballer, Zinedine Zidane, made a fool of himself in the 2006 World Cup, due to a similar but milder expression. Btw, according to charlatan Wikipedia, Zinedine Zidane is a muslim, but does not practice it. I.e. much like Mr X "president"! However, what has been a trade mark for muslimhood throughout 1400 yrs is the spreading of social cancer, i.e. the very opposite to the argument from godism people that "religion" can contribute with anything good for the society! It can't, precisely because it always tries to segregate itself from the only possible social basis, the Holy Negative Human Rights!
Klevius comment: These morons share the same ignorance abt islam as, for example, Bernard Lewis, whose belittling & glorifying of islamic slavery only compete with his complete lack of insight in the basic problem, sex segregation/rapetivism. It's like girls/women don't even really exist in Bernard Lewis' twisted historical mind.
Another example of schizoid thinking abt islam: Richard Francis Burton and David Livingstone were two British 19th Century explorers who reported two extremely different realities abt islam. While Burton wrapped it in naive "spiritualism" Livingstone, Britain's (Scotland's) foremost anti-slavery campaigner, saw islam's horrendous slavery traces in the East African Nile river land (Tutsi/Hutu land, Idi Amin land, Ujiji land, etc if you like).
The origin of evil islam (the worst ideological crime ever against humanity) lays in the Judaic slave trade interface during the Sassanian era. It's too complicated for a short single blogpost to explain but this framework then constituted the perfect opening for evil islam in the form of a looting sex slave jihadism, i.e. what muslims call the perfect example of Mohammed. However, due to the greatness* of islam's evilness it's almost impossible for most people to swallow, so they rather shoot the truth messenger than the murderous one!
* The "greatness" of islam's evilness is directly connected to its original popularity. Sex & booty jihad combined with institutionalized rapetivism in a Sharia dead end (apostasy ban) made for rapid growth of the muslim population. So 1.5 Billion "muslims" don't prove islam's goodness but rather its evilness.
The French World Cup team has deteriorated at abt the same pace as it has been muslimified
Ever thought abt why most players in the French team are blacks/muslims, when 90% of the French population is white non-muslim, and, moreover, when the majority of the best football players in European countries are white, and when the absolute elite players of the world are predominantly "white" (no, Klevius is no racist but a logician - if you have read your Klevius you know his sites/blogs are all abt getting rid of racist/sexist segregation)?!
Football is possibly the easiest sport to get into without financial support. Consequently most young footballers in the world are non-whites. But despite this fact the best players tend to be predominantly "whites". But saying this is considered racist while saying that the best black athletes (actually only some of the blacks rooted in West Africa - East African blacks are lousy sprinters) run faster (on shorter distances & straight forward - which car do you think perform better on a rally track, a stupid heavy costly non-greenish Veyron or a smart light inexpensive relatively greenish Subaru?) than the best "whites", is totally ok!?
Islam is a horrendous insult against every citizen (incl. muslims) in the free world! Only problem being you need to open your eyes & admit reality!
Islamic mosques, minarets, veils, customs etc. are insensitive reminders of the worst crime ever against humanity. It's offensive to non-muslims, including many from Arab countries. They see islam as launching a brutal "holy" war against non-muslims.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Charlatan PC Wikipedia: The Banu Qurayza were a Jewish tribe which lived at Medina, until the 7th century, when the conflict arose with the Prophet Muhammad that led to their demise.
Klevius parallel: The Holocaust victims were Westernized Jews which lived in Central Europe, until the conflict arose with the Fuhrer Hitler that led to their demise.
In 1935 Hitler introduced the Nuremberg Laws which prohibited Jews from marrying Aryans. 2010 similar (Sharia) laws prohibit a muslim (woman) from marrying non-muslims!
Westernized islam is a joke with unfortunate effects - real islam during 1400 yrs is, according to historical records, the by far, worst ideological crime ever!
Islam, as a concept, is a chameleon, much like muslim born (who hasn't performed official apostasy as yet!*) Mr X "president" who, by the help of eager/fanatical media supporters, is excused for whatever non sense he spits out ( like for example, the embarrassing "deep sea drilling is now safe" a couple of weeks before the oil spill catastophe, and then a couple of weeks later, in excusing his incompetency & ignorance, "I/we can't do anything because BP has the best expertice"!). This hypocrisy, btw, is a repetition of his completely unfounded attack on Toyota, the world's foremost (together with Honda) quality green car producer on the planet! And, btw, the only essence in the accusations was, in fact, related to a lousy American part from CTS Corp!
Non-Japanese manufacturers (like GM, which Mr X "president" socialized) have an abundance of quality problems because their cars are usually made almost all through with CTS-type non-Japanese parts!
* Like most muslims Mr X "president" "believes" in Jesus without believing in the divine part of him, which is essential to Christians! Mr X, because no one really knows who he is because everything essential abt his birth, student years etc. is kept in secret!
The most racist complaint is the silly notion that "the whites still dominate"! The logical consequence of such a racist statement would be the domination of "blacks"! Unless, of course, you're a stupid Marxist/utopist etc! It's in the shadow of this kind of evil retoric that evil medieval islam progresses.
This is why Klevius homepage since 2004 is called: Peter Klevius' definition of The HOLY (negative) HUMAN RIGHTS vs. RACE & SEX SEGREGATION (i e rapetivism). Let Islam face its founder & 1400 yrs of slavery/colonialism!
Klevius explanation of the title: Negative Human Rights constitute the basis for human freedom & also constitute the very opposite to islam, which consequensly tries to hide behind UN & islam's powerful but fascist islamist grouping OIC (representing the leaders of 57 islamist nations) which is now busy A) trying to criminalize criticism of the worst crime ever, and B) trying to implement islamist Sharia law under the laughable cover "islamic Human Rights"!
So except for his extremely important function as an intelligent & well informed islam critic Klevius is the world's right now foremost analyst of the impact of prevailing sex segregation on the topic. Mainly because no one else seems to have, as yet, realized, or rather dared to admit its importance!
Klevius, your light in the dark
You may stumble on Klevius, and even get hurt, but you can certainly also trust the intellectual depth and stability of Klevius. Not convinced? Just check out, for ex
We islam critics (but do note that some of the most important ones have emerged from islam's own back garden) will no longer tolerate disrespect, unreasonable double-standards and a relationship that is not based in reciprocity. These negative views have fed into the stereotypes of Whites, Europeans, Westerners or whatever you like to call "them", as a whole. Moreover, contraproductive PC has left us to consistently battle alone.
You PC people, your comments play a deeper role in the perpetuation of systemic and internalized racism and sexism that already exists. Your statements extend power to these negative images. The problem with generalizations is that the moment we invest in them we stop being hopeful, we stop being open, and we stop growing.
Monday, June 07, 2010
"Mohammed’s teaching" rests on a totalitarian/racist view on the infidel and a sexist rapetivist view on girls/women!
Update: The Saudi dictator family steers the world's biggest sharia organization (OIC) against women's Human Rights. How many women have been raped and mutilated because OIC's sharia declaration openly (via UN) robs women of full Human Rights equality. Of course the Saudi hate mongering policy, which is silently supported by many Western politicians ("because we prefer business"), in the eyes of many ignorant muslim men legitimizes what already the Koran states about the right to take sex slaves etc.
What responsibility does BBC have for not informing about the crystal clear link between Saudi islamofascism and OIC and islamofascist "blasphemy" restrictions (aka "islamophobia") that kept these girls uneducated about the origin of islam?
Klevius: Rapists care abt women, don’t they. And racists care abt difference between them and their victims, don’t they! These two are the main tenets in that islam which became successful through violent jihadism/slavery/rapetivism.
The worst ideological crime ever against humanity (i.e. 1400 yrs of relentless parasitism and genocides in the form of murderous Sharia slave finance) is said to have been inspired by Mohammed. However, according to science Mohammed was a no one until Malik more or less invented him and the Koran some half a century later, as a moral excuse for muslim atrocities (i.e. that the muslim raping, killing, slave-taking, stealing etc was sanctioned by Allah & no further questions should be asked due to Allah's possible motives for this murky logic)!
Isn't it strange that the only explanation to the origin of islam that fits both the historical records as well as the directives in islam, is avoided by all means?! The latest effort is a pathetique UK ad campaign ("Exploring islam", led by a misled, fanatic muslim woman of course - compare Ingrid Mattson* in the US - and sponsored by whom?!) in UK which spreads the most blatant misconceptions of islam.
* Ingrid Mattson, director of the Islamic Society of North America, ISNA, was a featured speaker May 4 at an interfaith event hosted by Congregation Kol Haverim in Glastonbury, Conn., titled "How Religious People of Peace Can Transform Differences and Build Bridges of Understanding." Jeffrey Epstein – who as president of the non-profit America's Truth Forum has researched and hosted conferences on the islamic terror threat to the U.S – told WND he "felt it best to leave" after the president of the synagogue interrupted his second question abt her ties to Muslim Brotherhood (sic), al-Qaida, Hamas and numerous other islamic groups that aim to establish islamic Sharia worldwide through terrorism and other means, which had elicited noticeable gasps from the mostly Jewish audience of about 100!
Islam has murdered & killed more innocent (oh, I forgot, they were of course infidels) people than any other ideology!
The human suffering under islam is monstrous throughout 1400 yrs! Just consider that only one in ten castrated African boys ever reached the slave market in Mecca, Medina etc!
Islam has for 1400 yrs been the worst slave raider/trader in the world history!
Islam is the slave master of every African slave Kunta Kinte who, after being captured & sold by muslim (or half-muslim) Africans, entered the soil of the Americas.
In islam slavery & rapetivism are ideologically inborn. This is why the West had to forcefully stop the islamic slave trading. Yes, I know, it's still going on under different cover ups.
Islam is parasitic piracy & lacks completely progressive features. This is why islam has to rely on civilizations! Islam is a conventional blood sucker!
When Saracean Jews & others, who had become wealthy on slavery in the interface between the Sassanid empire & the Arabian desert, transformed into islam, they constituted the key to the fast spreading of the new variant* of Judaism, i.e. islam.
* Islam is in fact just a repetition of the oldest & most evil form of Judaism, only islam's evilness is even more elaborate & sophisticated. If you've have read your Klevius carefully you already know that there's really only one "monotheism", i.e. Judaism, but that it has split in several, often competing & hostile variants, of which Christianity & islam are just two.
Only Klevius has (so far) effectively demonstrated the connection between rapetivist sex segregation & Judaic "monotheism". The Zoroastrian Zarathustra, whom the Jews copied, already contained the seed for what was to come when he stated that "to the false believers I'm a forthright enemy, but to the righteous a mighty help and joy"!
Circumcision became less important with the introduction of islam precisely because of islam's 100% confinement of girls/women (even today & even among Westernized muslims a woman cannot decide to love or marry a non-muslim man, while a muslim man can marry as many he likes without violating Sharia! Islam is a sexist dead end with the parasitic (& evil/stupid) aim to annihilate its host.
The ignorance of feamle muslims
However, "instead of focusing on stereotypical problematic issues such as hijab and forced marriage as main points, I let in my survey Muslim women talk about their aspirations and potential," says Sara Silvestri, a lecturer of international politics at Cambridge University. Sara Silvestri explains that a major goal of the study was to get a sense of the extent to which Islam plays a role in defining the experiences of women.
Klevius comment: Isn't it cute! "Islam plays a role in defining the experiences of women"! Yes, this is what OIC & its islamic "Human Rights" (i.e. Sharia) is all about. To exclude girls/women from the Negative (Freedom) Human Rights in the 1948 Human Rights Declaration!
"They all had a very personal relationship to their faith," says Silvestri.
Klevius comment: You can't have "a very personal relationship" to islam you moron! To yourself & your delusion perhaps but never to islam! Islam is collective & political, not personal!
"Muslim women living in Europe proudly feel to belong to Europe fully," was the conclusion of the study.
Klevius comment: This is the problem of islam in a nutshell. Let's not talk abt real islam but rather abt a polished picture of an islam that only exists in the fantasies of misled & ignorant individuals. Islam, however, is a collective anti-individual totalitarian ideology!
According to Remona Aly (who leads the UK Exploring islam propaganda - paid by whom?!), deputy editor of Emel, a British Muslim lifestyle magazine, media reports about Muslim women usually focus on stereotypes and controversies.
Klevius comment: Isn't that pretty much what media is all about?! And if it isn't it's usually a sign of repressing the truth!
Remona Aly (who wears a tight veil) believes that the conclusions of Silvestri's study reflect the reality of British Muslim women.
Klevius comment: Really!
Klevius reading proposal for Remona Aly:
The islamic origin of the Viking terror