Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
This woman is crying for money from mainly white taxpayers under the title "funding for the Legacy Commission, which commemorates the white's abolition of slavery (and the white's black liberation fight against islamic/Arabic slave masters who continued their dirty slavery-faith even after the abolition!)".
Liberal Democrat black Councillor Shirley Brown called Asian Conservative Jay Jethwa a “coconut” during a debate at Bristol City Council in England in February 2009. The term coconut is used to accuse someone of betraying their race or culture by implying that, like a coconut, they are brown on the outside but white on the inside.”
Background: The Bristol Legacy Commission, that was set up to support black and “ethnic” (usually muslim – the world’s largest “minority” group) minority people has been condemned as "a pointless spending spree" and has "squandered" its funding on "pet projects and jollies". Councillor Jay Jethwa had supported a proposal to cease funding the body, arguing that as an immigrant herself she had not needed such help. And according to Councillor Richard Eddy, said: "The Legacy Commission's report is nothing more than a shameless exercise in self-justification. "After commemorating Abolition 200 in 2007, Bristol ought to be tackling the problems of the present for the sake of all its citizens, rather than wallowing in self-indulgent hand-wringing over the past. "Instead, the Legacy Commission is continuing to squander over £250,000 a year on promoting division, subsidising politically-correct pet projects and funding jollies to the Gambia. "At the budget-fixing meeting in February, Conservative councillors sought to re-direct this scandalous waste of money towards protecting worthwhile frontline services but were defeated by Labour and the Lib Dems. "Over the last three years, over £1 million has been frittered away on this pointless spending spree and I am appalled to see that it is proposed to build this into the base budget from 2010/11."
Klevius comment: This is primarily a disgusting insult on the "white" culture that rescued Africa from islamic slavery! However, this aspect was never tried, as wasn't the fact that Jay Jethwa is rooted in Gujarat (India) a place slaughtered and enslaved by islam.
As you know if you have followed Klevius writings, islam originated as a moral excuse (they're infidels & we're chosen by god) for slave trade and slave jihad. This excuse was implemented by Malik long after the death of the alleged Mohammed figure who didn't even exist outside islamic fairy tales (Hugh Kennedy 2009).
The deliberate slavery formula we now call islam started affecting Africa, India etc already in the seventh century. Long before the West-African muslims started supplying labour slaves to the cotton plantations of the American-south, and many centuries before the first Kunta Kintes were caught and sold by muslim Africans and brought ashore to the sugar estates of Brazil and the Caribbean, Africans were being sold as slaves by the muslim Arab traders from the Eastern seaboard of Africa to Hindu Indian princes on the West Coast and Central India.
European travelers like Ludovico di Varthema in the 15th century reported that Gujaratis were deprived of their kingdom by muslims because of their kind heartedness: " …a certain race which eats nothing that has blood, never kills any living things… and these people are neither moors nor heathens… if they were baptized, they would all be saved by the virtue of their works, for they never do to others what they would not do unto them."
Jay Jethwa's husband (together with whom she has created an awarded Gujarat food shop in Bristol, England) is rooted in East-Africa, i.e. the very Swahililand that was one of the main sources of islam's enormous slave raiding/trading throughout some 1400 yrs!
Thursday, June 24, 2010
This is the typical naive & ignorant islam excuse! But triple so shocking when coming from an African woman!
Has "Abena in Africa" ever tried to educate herself abt Africa's history? Yes, I know! She was probably too busy consuming the PC "Western" "colonialism" so she missed the 1400 years of Arabic/islamic slave trading/raiding/genocides that has left Africa as the most backward continent (unless she thinks it's somehow in the genes of black African people)! Islam ties girls /women to their biological sex via "duties" & "responsibilities" as it's described in OIC's Cairo Declaration on "human rights" (in fact Sharia). But denying a human being her freedom because of her sex is just the very opposite to the original Human Rights Declaration from 1948!
Asma Halimi, a female reporter from Competition, was slapped in the face by Rafik Saifi of Algeria after his team lost 1-0 to the USA in the World Cup
"The problem begins when a man strikes a woman because she's a woman and usually weaker so he can vent his personal frustrations." says one commentator.
Klevius comment: No, the problem begins when we segregate girls/women from boys/men! It's called sex segregation (see the web's two best pages to make you understand what it's really abt: What's sex segregation and From Klevius without love). Doesn't the phrase "a woman is usually weaker" sound so stupid & illogical that only a mind heavily doped with sex segregation can utter it without realising it!
Rafik Saifi was planning to marry a French woman but didn't want it known. He revealed it in a Qatari interview but hoped it wouldn't break the language barrier (btw, much in islam is kept in a veil made out of Arabic, out of reach for most infidels!). However, Asma Halimi translated the interview. This may also be connected to the islamic fact that al Qaida-linked Salafists in Algeria
have killed and kidnapped hundreds of "French collaborators". These true muslims won the last democratic election in Algeria by the help of morons such as "Abena in Africa"! And, as you know, even if the dictatorship hadn't prevented the result, islam itself should have taken care of that because true islam is Sharia & leaves no room for other democratic means than getting into power through rapetivism (also compare how the Germans democratically supported Hitler in two consequtive elections!).
Klevius advice to "Abena in Africa": Educate yourself abt the Holy Negative Human Rights! Then you know why islam is useless, other than for evil purposes, in a free modern world!
Saturday, June 19, 2010
and the true face of islam
and a muslim footballer (Nicolas Anelka) who calls his non-muslim (infidel) coach "a dirty (non-muslim) son of a whore"
Another muslim footballer, Zinedine Zidane, made a fool of himself in the 2006 World Cup, due to a similar but milder expression. Btw, according to charlatan Wikipedia, Zinedine Zidane is a muslim, but does not practice it. I.e. much like Mr X "president"! However, what has been a trade mark for muslimhood throughout 1400 yrs is the spreading of social cancer, i.e. the very opposite to the argument from godism people that "religion" can contribute with anything good for the society! It can't, precisely because it always tries to segregate itself from the only possible social basis, the Holy Negative Human Rights!
Klevius comment: These morons share the same ignorance abt islam as, for example, Bernard Lewis, whose belittling & glorifying of islamic slavery only compete with his complete lack of insight in the basic problem, sex segregation/rapetivism. It's like girls/women don't even really exist in Bernard Lewis' twisted historical mind.
Another example of schizoid thinking abt islam: Richard Francis Burton and David Livingstone were two British 19th Century explorers who reported two extremely different realities abt islam. While Burton wrapped it in naive "spiritualism" Livingstone, Britain's (Scotland's) foremost anti-slavery campaigner, saw islam's horrendous slavery traces in the East African Nile river land (Tutsi/Hutu land, Idi Amin land, Ujiji land, etc if you like).
The origin of evil islam (the worst ideological crime ever against humanity) lays in the Judaic slave trade interface during the Sassanian era. It's too complicated for a short single blogpost to explain but this framework then constituted the perfect opening for evil islam in the form of a looting sex slave jihadism, i.e. what muslims call the perfect example of Mohammed. However, due to the greatness* of islam's evilness it's almost impossible for most people to swallow, so they rather shoot the truth messenger than the murderous one!
* The "greatness" of islam's evilness is directly connected to its original popularity. Sex & booty jihad combined with institutionalized rapetivism in a Sharia dead end (apostasy ban) made for rapid growth of the muslim population. So 1.5 Billion "muslims" don't prove islam's goodness but rather its evilness.
The French World Cup team has deteriorated at abt the same pace as it has been muslimified
Ever thought abt why most players in the French team are blacks/muslims, when 90% of the French population is white non-muslim, and, moreover, when the majority of the best football players in European countries are white, and when the absolute elite players of the world are predominantly "white" (no, Klevius is no racist but a logician - if you have read your Klevius you know his sites/blogs are all abt getting rid of racist/sexist segregation)?!
Football is possibly the easiest sport to get into without financial support. Consequently most young footballers in the world are non-whites. But despite this fact the best players tend to be predominantly "whites". But saying this is considered racist while saying that the best black athletes (actually only some of the blacks rooted in West Africa - East African blacks are lousy sprinters) run faster (on shorter distances & straight forward - which car do you think perform better on a rally track, a stupid heavy costly non-greenish Veyron or a smart light inexpensive relatively greenish Subaru?) than the best "whites", is totally ok!?
Islam is a horrendous insult against every citizen (incl. muslims) in the free world! Only problem being you need to open your eyes & admit reality!
Islamic mosques, minarets, veils, customs etc. are insensitive reminders of the worst crime ever against humanity. It's offensive to non-muslims, including many from Arab countries. They see islam as launching a brutal "holy" war against non-muslims.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Charlatan PC Wikipedia: The Banu Qurayza were a Jewish tribe which lived at Medina, until the 7th century, when the conflict arose with the Prophet Muhammad that led to their demise.
Klevius parallel: The Holocaust victims were Westernized Jews which lived in Central Europe, until the conflict arose with the Fuhrer Hitler that led to their demise.
In 1935 Hitler introduced the Nuremberg Laws which prohibited Jews from marrying Aryans. 2010 similar (Sharia) laws prohibit a muslim (woman) from marrying non-muslims!
Westernized islam is a joke with unfortunate effects - real islam during 1400 yrs is, according to historical records, the by far, worst ideological crime ever!
Islam, as a concept, is a chameleon, much like muslim born (who hasn't performed official apostasy as yet!*) Mr X "president" who, by the help of eager/fanatical media supporters, is excused for whatever non sense he spits out ( like for example, the embarrassing "deep sea drilling is now safe" a couple of weeks before the oil spill catastophe, and then a couple of weeks later, in excusing his incompetency & ignorance, "I/we can't do anything because BP has the best expertice"!). This hypocrisy, btw, is a repetition of his completely unfounded attack on Toyota, the world's foremost (together with Honda) quality green car producer on the planet! And, btw, the only essence in the accusations was, in fact, related to a lousy American part from CTS Corp!
Non-Japanese manufacturers (like GM, which Mr X "president" socialized) have an abundance of quality problems because their cars are usually made almost all through with CTS-type non-Japanese parts!
* Like most muslims Mr X "president" "believes" in Jesus without believing in the divine part of him, which is essential to Christians! Mr X, because no one really knows who he is because everything essential abt his birth, student years etc. is kept in secret!
The most racist complaint is the silly notion that "the whites still dominate"! The logical consequence of such a racist statement would be the domination of "blacks"! Unless, of course, you're a stupid Marxist/utopist etc! It's in the shadow of this kind of evil retoric that evil medieval islam progresses.
This is why Klevius homepage since 2004 is called: Peter Klevius' definition of The HOLY (negative) HUMAN RIGHTS vs. RACE & SEX SEGREGATION (i e rapetivism). Let Islam face its founder & 1400 yrs of slavery/colonialism!
Klevius explanation of the title: Negative Human Rights constitute the basis for human freedom & also constitute the very opposite to islam, which consequensly tries to hide behind UN & islam's powerful but fascist islamist grouping OIC (representing the leaders of 57 islamist nations) which is now busy A) trying to criminalize criticism of the worst crime ever, and B) trying to implement islamist Sharia law under the laughable cover "islamic Human Rights"!
So except for his extremely important function as an intelligent & well informed islam critic Klevius is the world's right now foremost analyst of the impact of prevailing sex segregation on the topic. Mainly because no one else seems to have, as yet, realized, or rather dared to admit its importance!
Klevius, your light in the dark
You may stumble on Klevius, and even get hurt, but you can certainly also trust the intellectual depth and stability of Klevius. Not convinced? Just check out, for ex
We islam critics (but do note that some of the most important ones have emerged from islam's own back garden) will no longer tolerate disrespect, unreasonable double-standards and a relationship that is not based in reciprocity. These negative views have fed into the stereotypes of Whites, Europeans, Westerners or whatever you like to call "them", as a whole. Moreover, contraproductive PC has left us to consistently battle alone.
You PC people, your comments play a deeper role in the perpetuation of systemic and internalized racism and sexism that already exists. Your statements extend power to these negative images. The problem with generalizations is that the moment we invest in them we stop being hopeful, we stop being open, and we stop growing.
Monday, June 07, 2010
"Mohammed’s teaching" rests on a totalitarian/racist view on the infidel and a sexist rapetivist view on girls/women!
Update: The Saudi dictator family steers the world's biggest sharia organization (OIC) against women's Human Rights. How many women have been raped and mutilated because OIC's sharia declaration openly (via UN) robs women of full Human Rights equality. Of course the Saudi hate mongering policy, which is silently supported by many Western politicians ("because we prefer business"), in the eyes of many ignorant muslim men legitimizes what already the Koran states about the right to take sex slaves etc.
What responsibility does BBC have for not informing about the crystal clear link between Saudi islamofascism and OIC and islamofascist "blasphemy" restrictions (aka "islamophobia") that kept these girls uneducated about the origin of islam?
Klevius: Rapists care abt women, don’t they. And racists care abt difference between them and their victims, don’t they! These two are the main tenets in that islam which became successful through violent jihadism/slavery/rapetivism.
The worst ideological crime ever against humanity (i.e. 1400 yrs of relentless parasitism and genocides in the form of murderous Sharia slave finance) is said to have been inspired by Mohammed. However, according to science Mohammed was a no one until Malik more or less invented him and the Koran some half a century later, as a moral excuse for muslim atrocities (i.e. that the muslim raping, killing, slave-taking, stealing etc was sanctioned by Allah & no further questions should be asked due to Allah's possible motives for this murky logic)!
Isn't it strange that the only explanation to the origin of islam that fits both the historical records as well as the directives in islam, is avoided by all means?! The latest effort is a pathetique UK ad campaign ("Exploring islam", led by a misled, fanatic muslim woman of course - compare Ingrid Mattson* in the US - and sponsored by whom?!) in UK which spreads the most blatant misconceptions of islam.
* Ingrid Mattson, director of the Islamic Society of North America, ISNA, was a featured speaker May 4 at an interfaith event hosted by Congregation Kol Haverim in Glastonbury, Conn., titled "How Religious People of Peace Can Transform Differences and Build Bridges of Understanding." Jeffrey Epstein – who as president of the non-profit America's Truth Forum has researched and hosted conferences on the islamic terror threat to the U.S – told WND he "felt it best to leave" after the president of the synagogue interrupted his second question abt her ties to Muslim Brotherhood (sic), al-Qaida, Hamas and numerous other islamic groups that aim to establish islamic Sharia worldwide through terrorism and other means, which had elicited noticeable gasps from the mostly Jewish audience of about 100!
Islam has murdered & killed more innocent (oh, I forgot, they were of course infidels) people than any other ideology!
The human suffering under islam is monstrous throughout 1400 yrs! Just consider that only one in ten castrated African boys ever reached the slave market in Mecca, Medina etc!
Islam has for 1400 yrs been the worst slave raider/trader in the world history!
Islam is the slave master of every African slave Kunta Kinte who, after being captured & sold by muslim (or half-muslim) Africans, entered the soil of the Americas.
In islam slavery & rapetivism are ideologically inborn. This is why the West had to forcefully stop the islamic slave trading. Yes, I know, it's still going on under different cover ups.
Islam is parasitic piracy & lacks completely progressive features. This is why islam has to rely on civilizations! Islam is a conventional blood sucker!
When Saracean Jews & others, who had become wealthy on slavery in the interface between the Sassanid empire & the Arabian desert, transformed into islam, they constituted the key to the fast spreading of the new variant* of Judaism, i.e. islam.
* Islam is in fact just a repetition of the oldest & most evil form of Judaism, only islam's evilness is even more elaborate & sophisticated. If you've have read your Klevius carefully you already know that there's really only one "monotheism", i.e. Judaism, but that it has split in several, often competing & hostile variants, of which Christianity & islam are just two.
Only Klevius has (so far) effectively demonstrated the connection between rapetivist sex segregation & Judaic "monotheism". The Zoroastrian Zarathustra, whom the Jews copied, already contained the seed for what was to come when he stated that "to the false believers I'm a forthright enemy, but to the righteous a mighty help and joy"!
Circumcision became less important with the introduction of islam precisely because of islam's 100% confinement of girls/women (even today & even among Westernized muslims a woman cannot decide to love or marry a non-muslim man, while a muslim man can marry as many he likes without violating Sharia! Islam is a sexist dead end with the parasitic (& evil/stupid) aim to annihilate its host.
The ignorance of feamle muslims
However, "instead of focusing on stereotypical problematic issues such as hijab and forced marriage as main points, I let in my survey Muslim women talk about their aspirations and potential," says Sara Silvestri, a lecturer of international politics at Cambridge University. Sara Silvestri explains that a major goal of the study was to get a sense of the extent to which Islam plays a role in defining the experiences of women.
Klevius comment: Isn't it cute! "Islam plays a role in defining the experiences of women"! Yes, this is what OIC & its islamic "Human Rights" (i.e. Sharia) is all about. To exclude girls/women from the Negative (Freedom) Human Rights in the 1948 Human Rights Declaration!
"They all had a very personal relationship to their faith," says Silvestri.
Klevius comment: You can't have "a very personal relationship" to islam you moron! To yourself & your delusion perhaps but never to islam! Islam is collective & political, not personal!
"Muslim women living in Europe proudly feel to belong to Europe fully," was the conclusion of the study.
Klevius comment: This is the problem of islam in a nutshell. Let's not talk abt real islam but rather abt a polished picture of an islam that only exists in the fantasies of misled & ignorant individuals. Islam, however, is a collective anti-individual totalitarian ideology!
According to Remona Aly (who leads the UK Exploring islam propaganda - paid by whom?!), deputy editor of Emel, a British Muslim lifestyle magazine, media reports about Muslim women usually focus on stereotypes and controversies.
Klevius comment: Isn't that pretty much what media is all about?! And if it isn't it's usually a sign of repressing the truth!
Remona Aly (who wears a tight veil) believes that the conclusions of Silvestri's study reflect the reality of British Muslim women.
Klevius comment: Really!
Klevius reading proposal for Remona Aly:
The islamic origin of the Viking terror