Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, November 30, 2012

BBC and an orthodox Jew want to strangle media so to protect fascist islam (OIC/Sharia)


Islamofascism supporting BBC, which is financed by compulsory fees/taxes etc., actually started and upheld the campaign for the very purpose of aiding OIC's Sharia


While UK justice lord Levenson, an orthodox Jew, recommends that British politicians establish an independent media regulator with the power to discipline the country’s press, the UN was busy holding talks on whether the Internet should be regulated by the islamofascist cotrolled UN.

Levenson also wants to make it easier for complaints about "defamation" and "minorities who feel unfairly portrayed".

Klevius comment: OIC and Sharia!






 . .

Saturday, November 24, 2012

The sickness called Islam


US rights or Universal Human Rights against islamofascist Sharia?


Devvy Kidd: Anyone who has taken the time to read and listen to the words of Muslim clerics and the Muslim Brotherhood fully and clearly understand the number one goal is to take over these united States of America and replace the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights with the sickness called Islam. The Islamic Movement in this country is sedition.

Why Islam Should NOT Be Protected Under the US Constitution 


"Lawmakers tell us Muslims have a First Amendment “Right” to build mosques, proselytize, and implement Sharia here. But that's not what the First Amendment says. "It says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” "Now consider the verbiage very carefully. A lot of lawmakers and most Americans make the exegetical error that the First Amendment grants us rights.

The First Amendment doesn't grant any rights to anybody. All it does is prohibit Congress from making laws about religion, speech, the press, or assembly. "Therefore, Muslims do not have a First Amendment “Right” to build mosques, proselytize, and implement Sharia in our country. "As Publius Huldah correctly points out, “Not only do Muslims claim the “right” to impose Shariah in the Muslim communities springing up throughout our Country, they also claim the “right” to impose Sharia law in the public square: They demand Sharia compliant financial institutions, foot baths in public places, that wine, sausages, and the like be banned from their presence, that they be allowed to shut down public streets for “prayers”, etc.”


Why the US can ONLY be protected from islamofascist Sharia by defending Universal Human Rights


Klevius comment: Negative Human Rights (the bedrock of Human Rights, i.e. freedom from religious or other impositions), not "god", is our only defense against islamofascism! We need Universal Rights, not US or Sharia "rights". And these rights ought to be Human Rights not "god's" "rights". "God's" "rights" means human impositions whereas (the negative part of) Human Rights means precisely the opposite.

But sadly, the stubbornness of "monotheist god-people" based on the racist/sexist "chosen people" and sex segregation idea, instead of defending Human Rights, paves the way for islamofascism.

It's truly ironic that religious right-wingers in the US share the same reluctance against Negative Human Rights as do socialists/communists. The former because it clashes with Biblical sex apartheid, and the latter because it clashes with the social state (see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship, the world's most important sociological paper written in the last century).


























 .








.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

England makes a fool of itself by not allowing female bishops. Is it because of the Saudis and islam?!



British church homophobia and misogyny

compared to Sweden

The world's first lesbian bishop


Gerd Eva Cecilia Brunne (born 7 March 1954 in Malmö) is Swedish and a bishop in the Church of Sweden.
Brunne has served as a priest from 1978 (Sweden has allowed female priests since 1958).  In May 2009 she was elected as bishop in the Diocese of Stockholm, winning the election by 413 votes to 365. She was ordained to the episcopate on 8 November 2009 and is understood to be the world's first openly lesbian bishop.

Eva Brunne is married with Swedish priest Gunilla Lindén.



Klevius comment: Of course it's contrary to the Bible etc but not contrary to Klevius and Human Rights. And that's all that really counts, isnt it.

Why not get really fundamentalist by going to the roots of "monotheisms", i.e. sex apartheid, and create a separate church for women?

Christianity, i.e. Roman Jews believing in Jesus, would never have become so powerful in Europe after the Romans, was it not for the Jewish slave traders not believing in Jesus, and later on the islamic/muslim Jihad against Southern Europe (the Vikings took care of the Northern Europe).



In Klevius series Sex Tutorials: The relationship between "monotheisms", psychoanalysis and feminism

The cultural schizophrenia that upholds sex segregation


The male "god" "created" Adam as a copy of himself (sic) and made woman out of a tiny part (a ribbon) of Adam for the purpose of silently serving and pleasing him. This is the strange sexist formula of racist Jewish "monotheism" (the only "god" that rules the whole world but has chosen only the Jews).

Klevius definition of religion 

Sadly, many (probably most) people have been confused by terms such as 'gender', 'feminism' etc. But real feminism is just the female form of chauvinism, i.e.defending sex segregation.


From Klevius 2004 web page Human Rights from Klevius without Love:


Klevius: August Strindberg announced the death of the father in 1887. Feminists then shot the patriarch while the state took the children (Klevius 1996). May I now suggest euthanasia for the mother (see Angels of Antichrist and Childless child psychoanalysts in search for womanhood/femininity)
The double standards of feminism 
"False and true feminism" (French law professor Raymond Saleilles in late 19th century). And a modern feminist:

"
Anti-feminists emerge paradoxically in the history of the cause more as the heiresses of the mother of feminism herself"
Social/political/economic equality of the sexes is a tautology in a feminist paradigm. Feminism rests on 
sex segregation (i.e. enforcing a cultural "feminine/masculine" sex/gender dichotomy) hence counteracting real emancipation. The cure is actually part of the disease (other main cuplprits being psychoanalysis and Islam). 22.000 estimated rapes/yr in Sweden almost outrun the notorious Victorian sex-horror of Freud's time! Feminism has done nothing for "the other sex" in abt 100 yrs, except claiming un-deserved credits! It seems that girls/women now, due to sex segregation are even worse off and with less real self-esteem etc than ever! The feminist Swedish children's TV is now filled with princesses, "femininity", "chance" lessons etc. sex segregational stuff that effectively hinders girls' and boys' sex-free relations.. No wonder many girls end up as feminists and the boys retreat (except for sex)!



Klevius comment: No wonder Swedish feminists opposed girls playing football in the 1960s and 70s.


Klevius opposes feminism because it was created in the late 19th century (abt 1894/95, or maybe slightly earlier) as a reaction to women's liberation and equal rights movement (which was supposed to lead to "women becoming men". Already back then many "feminists" also asked for equal rights without confronting the underlying segregation in full. There has been much confusion - mostly deliberate - about the term ever since, though. But real feminism is what the word implies, i.e. separatism from non-feminines. Real feminists are scared to death of loosing cultural "femininity", perhaps even more so than chauvinist men (if they exist anymore other than in some Hip Hop camps and fundamentalist Islamic etc societies). Don't let yourself be confused by feminist effort to apply the term feminism on historically non-feminist achievements, writings etc. Mary Wollstonecraft, for example, didn't know about feminism (hundred years before its first appearance with this meaning) and in fact opposed and ridiculed femininity. This notwithstanding many now try to make of her a feminist. But feminism is the main obstacle for girls'/women's (and ultimately men's) real liberation.

Klevius comment: This is why "muslim Sharia feminism" makes sense but is truly disgusting.




.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Turkey's PM Erdogan: Israel is a terrorist state! Klevius: Islam is a terrorist religion!


Acknowledgement: The poetic basis for Klevius epistemological world is, as stated in Demand for Resources – on the right to be poor (1992:21-22,38) the inescapable rationality of the surrounding nature/universe mirrored in the limits imposed on us by our existence-centrism (see Origin of Universe). However, this uncertainty is what makes life worth of living. Without it we would be all-knowing "gods" and bored to death. Why do you think football (real football - not American handball) is the world's most popular sport? Because no one will ever master a round ball moving between players who try their best to cheat each other while no hands are allowed! No wonder that this the world's trickiest game for so long has been considered taboo for girls/women.


The danger of truth


The name of this blog is so disturbing that it has become heavily filtered by islamofascists and their supporters. However, the simple truth is that the name is precisely what you end up with when you mirror islam and its history against Human Rights!







The problem with islam is its own evilness - this is why OIC wants us to shut up 


To really comprehend the level of confused fanaticism combined with low intellectual standard that signify muslim terrorists, consider the following reference to Koran and statements by Muhammad Badie, the "Supreme Guide" of the Muslim Brotherhood: Obey Allah's commandment to wage jihad for His sake with [their] money and [their] lives, so that Allah's word will reign supreme and the infidels' word will be inferior. The Jews have dominated the land, spread corruption on earth, spilled the blood of believers and in their actions profaned holy places, including their own." As such, he demanded that the Arab world reject negotiations with Israel in favor of "holy Jihad”.

Are Hamas muslims belonging to peaceful non-islam or original evil islam? 


Hama's charter: Israel will exist and will continue to exist until islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it. The Day of Judgment will not come about until muslims fight/kills the Jews.

Klevius comment: According to OIC, Erdogan etc, there's only one islam and it's a crime to criticize islam. That would mean criticizing Hamas reference to islam and muslims in their charter is either a crime or Hamas aren't muslims and do not represent islam.Tell that to Palestinians, will you!















Klevius view on Israel: The end of the Jewish Diaspora in the form of the releasing key to the curse of Canaan. When the Khazar (and other) Jews got a bad reputation because of their extensive trading in white slave girls and eventually were persecuted* and driven out of Russia, those who ended up in non-Russian Europe became secularized and later, came to constitute the basis for an almost secular and democratic modern state based on technology in the midst and misery of where it all started. Where the Saudis turned from slave driven plantation wealth to oil wealth, the bulk of modern Israelites really produced something by themselves.
* Although the majority of Jews didn't inherit this wealth built up by slave trading their "Jewishness" became a negative and stigmatizing label, reinforced during harsh times and the existence of Jewish "capitalists".

Klevius tutorial on Jews, Judaism and Israel - and the origin of islam

(based on the Jewish Encyclopedia and Klevius IQ - please do note that the excerpts are made by biased Jews)

Why rapetivism and slave finance have constituted the back bone of Judaism and islam


From circumcised Jews to Vagina Jews and Penis muslims - all kept together with rapetivism and slave finance

You're lucky, dear reader, to still have the possibility to be informed by Klevius who happens to be the world's best informed "expert" on sex segregation (yes, it's truly sad that the competition is almost nil - Bourdieu's cautious take on the subject was anyway miserably entangled in Marxism etc).
















It all started with the racist and sexist idea about the world's only true “god” who had chosen the Jews as its blessed people. That leaves little else for the rest of mankind except jealousy or contempt. If you're not a racist then you can't possibly respect racism, can you.

The curse of sexist sex apartheid and slavery racism


They fight in Mideast as they always have.

Ever thought about why there never emerged other "monotheisms" in the world? Only the Jewish one and its derivatives. "Monotheism" wasn't and isn't the rule nor is it, as some racist supremacists like to put it, "the latest stage of civilization". Quite the contrary. Something special happened in the Mideast and it was certainly not "god". And as Klevius has repeatedly pointed out it's about institutionalized sex apartheid (sex slavery) in a way (the Bible etc) that wasn't necessary elsewhere. Neither Buddha (Nepal 563-483 BCE) nor Confucius (China 551–479 BCE) made any effort to blame sex segregation on a "god" conveniently out of reach for others to scrutinize. Nor can you find it anywhere else on the planet. Klevius has also pointed to the strange fact that only semitic (and later, not original, Indo-European) languages have the curious separation of the sexes in third person pronouns (well, it was easy for Klevius who masters Finnish where you simply use 'hän' instead of the stupid Swedish 'han'/'hon' or English 'he'/'she' segregation). The rest of the world has shown that you can not only survive but even gain from dropping this linguistic anomaly.


The curse of sex segregation


 
Canaan was the first of the seven sinners who made idols for the heathens, the other six being Phut, Shelah, Nimrod, Elah, Diul, and Shuah. Canaan, with his six companions, brought precious stones from Havilah (Gen. ii. 11-12), and made of them idols, which at night shone as brightly as the sun, and which were endowed with a power so magical that, when the blind Ammorites kissed them, they regained their eyesight ("Chronicles of Jerahmeel," p. 167; compare Kenaz).

Canaan, in a certain sense, was predestined to this and similar offenses; for he was begotten by his father while in Noah's Ark, whereas God had commanded that the sexes should live separately therein (Gen. R. xxxvi.).

Klevius comment: The mythological Ark wasn't out at sea for longer than 150 days, which fact the mythological all-knowing “god” who ordered the project must have been aware of. Therefore the segregation of the sexes cannot have been imposed because of fear of too many passengers. So why? This, of course, reflects not only a general pattern of sex apartheid but also reveals a particular and deeply perverted view on girls/women among those who created the story.

Concerning the curse of Noah upon Canaan, the Midrashim endeavored in different ways to give a solution to the question why Canaan had to suffer for the sins of his father. The old explanation was that Canaan, not Ham, though he had in no sense transgressed against his grandfather, had to be cursed by him because God had blessed Noah and his sons; and wherever the blessing of God rests there can be no curse (R. Judah, Gen. R. l.c.; Justin Martyr, "Dial. cum Tryph." cxxxix.). This explanation, however, was found to be defective; for it was contrary to Jewish sentiment to curse an innocent man; hence the new assertion that Canaan, like his father, transgressed against Noah.

Canaan the father of slaves - and slave masters

Through the curse which Canaan brought upon himself, the low condition of slaves (Canaan's descendants) is to be explained; for parents exercise a strong influence, for good or for evil, upon the fate of their offspring. "Wo unto the sinners," comments a Midrash, "who bring evil upon themselves, their children, their children's children; in fact, upon all the generations that follow."

Klevius comment: This was the key for "the chosen people" to exploit the cursed.

Many of the sons of Canaan were worthy of being ordained as rabbis; but the guilt of their father barred them from such a career (Yoma 87a). God, however, is different from man. Man seeks to deprive his enemies of the means of subsistence; but God, though He cursed Canaan, made him a slave, that he might eat and drink of that which his master possessed (ib. 75a).

Klevius comment: In short, the backbone of Jewish history ever since is that of slave trading. This was what made Jews in the Diaspora rich and influential. And this was the secret behind the "peaceful co-existence" in Al-Andalusia's "Golden Age" and elsewhere.

Also consider the Origin of the Vikings.


From the Jewish Vagina via Jews believing in Jesus (not Christ) to the muslim Penis, i.e. the origin of islam


Matrilineality in Judaism is the view that people born of a Jewish mother are themselves Jewish. The Torah does not explicitly discuss the conferring of Jewish status through matrilineality, and in apparent contrast to this position, the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) provides many examples of Israelite men whose children through foreign women appear to have been accepted as Israelite.
Klevius comment: As described by Klevius about the kinship atom, matrilineality via one's sister is the basic form of identifying ones biokin relation. You and your sister both came from the same controlled Vagina. So if your sister has a daughter/grand-daughter who marries your son/grand-son you can be 100% sure their children are directly related, via an unbroken chain of Vaginas, to you. However, when the Jews started their disastrous "the chosen people" genocide policy they created Jews via the Penis/rapetivism so as to get as many Jewish soldier as possible, i.e. what islam much later re-introduced hence resulting in less than 10 Million Jews and more than 1,5 Billion muslims.

However, in Mishnah in the 2nd century CE there's a shift in Rabbinic Judaism from patrilineal to matrilineal descent.

Klevius comment:This was to distinguish against Jews believing in Jesus or Christ. And because of this Christian Jews became  Christians in terminology.

In the Hellenistic period of the 4th Century BCE – 1st Century CE some evidence indicates that the offspring of intermarriages between Jewish men and non-Jewish women were considered Jewish.

Klevius comment:  After Alexander the Great many Jews learned Greek and moved out. This laid the basis for the Jewish civil wars etc.
 
Philo of Alexandria calls the child of a Jew and a non-Jew a nothos (bastard), regardless of whether the non-Jewish parent is the father or the mother.

Klevius comment: This is a more than usually stupid Wikipedia sentence. Philo was a Diaspora Jew (Hellenistic Jew) and supported matrileineality. Being a Jew means being a male Jew. The woman is only the reproducer.



Origin of islam and its desecration of Universal Human Rights 


According to Hugh Kennedy, professor of Arabic language and Arabic history,"before Abd al-Malik, caliph 685-705, Mohammed, who allegedly died 632,  is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever...", and according to Klevius, one has to differ between the evil plundering, enslavement and rapetivism in the vacuum after the Romans, and its “moral” institutionalization – by blaiming Allah – a couple of generations later under Malik.

Initially islam (or what came to be islam) grew out of the formula:
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+apostasy ban

This, together with the poor, illiterate Arab Bedouins, steered by Jewish Christian leaders (and their conspiracies) through the old trade routes in a robbing, pillaging and raping campaign, is the only explanation to the sudden "success" of what later became institutionalized as Kora/islam. And what was "successful" on the Arabian peninsula of course worked equally well in North Africa and elsewhere. And the further they went the more women and soldiers etc submitted to the formula. By force, greed or whatever. Those who didn't were slaughtered.

Islam now expands by the help of oil money and the protection from those very Human Rights its top organization (the muslim world Caliphate) OIC has abandoned and replaced with its pompous racist and sexist Sharia (the so called Cairo declaration). 

Today the most intolerant country in the world, Saudi Arabia, is the “guardian of islam” while Indonesia, the world's most populous muslim nation, like many other muslimized/islamized places, doesn't allow its citizen not to believe in “god”, i.e. no freedom FROM religion.

So called “extremist” muslims* (Sharia muslims, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood, Salafists/Wahhabists, Hizbut Tahrir etc etc) know that islam is dead without fundamentalism, i.e. those very original racist/sexist pillars that attracted in the first place. And who is, by non-muslims or secular muslims, considered “extremist muslims” inevitably changes all the time in accordance with their growing understanding of what is the original true islam and the impossibility of trying to mutilate it.

* Interestingly, those who call themselves non-fundamentalists but defend a "god-moral" also defend the continuous change in interpretation of this "the only god's moral" due to societal changes. I.e. precisely as the so called man made law, except that they can still keep up senseless ordinations by referring to a "god" that can't be questioned about it.

Just some years ago most “Westerners” considered demand for Sharia (i.e. the abandoning of Universal Human Rights) extreme. Today most understand that there is no real islam without Sharia. This is how islam's inborn evil has survived after long latent periods of inactivity due to its own impotency. Parasitism needs nutrition from outside itself.

Israel is a Westernized country mostly populated with Westerners who call themselves, due to tradition, Jews but are not (just like most Christians). Because of this Israel is the most developed nation in a sea of islamic misery or oil induced wealth or Western welfare aid.


Intellectual or physical (or both) warfare is the inevitable product of “monotheisms”


And the only reason why the enormous mass of non-believers isn't recognized is because they aren't organized under a “god”.




Time-line 


Klevius comment:

The people chosen by the world's only god 


Circumcision 


The slaughter of the Canaanites 


Slave finance based on religion becoming the backbone of Judaic finance 


Hellenization and the war(s) between Jews 


Mishnah and Thalmud  - the separation of orthodox Jews and Christian/Jesus Jews


Crimean Khanate - just one example


For a long time, until the early 18th century, the khanate maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East. In a process called the "harvesting of the steppe", they enslaved Slavic peasants.

Klevius comment: Mainly white girls who were valued highest on the slave market (see Origin of the Vikings).

Antisemitism because of slave finance 


The disintegration of the Ottoman slave empire due to West's abolishment of slavery 


Jews fleeing Russia for Europe 


European (re)antisemitism – now fueled by history and the wealth/power of some Jews 


Holocaust 


Israel 


A practically dead islam revitalized by oil demand from Western technology


OIC, modern islamofascism 




Sayeeda Warsi, UK's leading Human Rightsophobe, is now degraded (or upgraded) to "Minister of Faith" but continues her eager work for Sharia and islamofascism.























 .







.


.

Sunday, November 18, 2012

What does OIC, BBC, and islam have in common?

Rapetivism


.


.


.









.






.






















Sheik Yer Mami:
Trusted Koran teacher convicted of sexual assault against girls as young as four.
He was convicted on all 13 counts.
Ashraf Miah, 38, of Joseph Street, Mile End, was sentenced to three years and three months imprisonment, put on the sex offenders register for life and is not allowed to work with children.  The tragedy of this case is that a “highly respected member of the community” took advantage of their position of trust. (Source)

Mick Gradwell, a former detective superintendent, said the targeting of underage and vulnerable girls had been going on for decades.  He added: ‘You have girls being abused and raped and yet the most senior officers are refusing to comment on it. On what other subject would you get that?
‘How many young girls have been abused and raped because of the reluctance of the authorities to say exactly what is happening?’
Mr Gradwell spoke out following a trial in Derby which resulted in Abid Saddique, 27, and Mohammed Liaqat, 28, being jailed for a total of 19 years last week after targeting underage girls.
His warning also follows the arrests of a gang of Asian men over claims they plied 14 white girls with drink and drugs before turning them into sex slaves in Rochdale, near Manchester.
In the aftermath of these cases, former home secretary Jack Straw prompted controversy when he described some of the victims as ‘easy meat’ for gangs – often made up of Pakistani men – who trawl the streets looking for sex. The vulnerable girls in Rochdale – some as young as 13 – say they were forced to work the streets as prostitutes and hand over money to the gang.
The nine men, eight of them Asian, (Paki Muslims, not Japanese or Chinese) were questioned by detectives after officers swooped on a number of addresses.


Mohammad gets “confused by very permissible Western society”
A (Muslim) pervert used a mirror to spy on women as they got changed at swimming baths in Manchester.  A court heard that student Mohammad Bataineh, who is originally from Jordan, was confused by ‘very permissive’ Western society.
But a judge sitting at Manchester magistrates court ‘utterly rejected’ his excuse, saying: “You have been in this country for three years.”  Bataineh, 35, a PhD student at Salford University, admitted committing two counts of voyeurism at the Manchester Aquatics Centre. (Source)
Muhammad, profit of Islam, and Mariya, his sex slave
Prophet: “Having sex with slave girls is not dishonorable. Allah has made* them halal for me.” (33.50 “Mohammed , sex with slave girls and captured women is halal for you) (Source).












.







.


.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Human Rights vs Abu Qatada/islam


Deal with the Devil and you'll be burned - even if you call him "peaceful"!


As Klevius has long ago pointed out there is a chain of dangerous Sharia supporting (OIC) and Human Rights hating (deliberately or just due to stupidity) UK women strategically positioned in the midst of a net work consisting of Saudi Arabia, EU, UN/OIC, and BBC.


1 Kate Rudd, the British Consul General in Jeddah, started her diplomatic career as head of the UK Trade and Investment delegation to Iraq and her questionable position has only deepened as the delegation’s representative to OIC.


2 European Union's high representative for foreign affairs, Catherine Ashton (see text below).
 
3 Muslim Sayeeda Warsi ('Minister for Faith islam' – is at the Foreign Office and includes being the lead minister responsible for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Central Asia, the UN, the International Criminal Court and OIC, which is the largest multi-lateral organisation in the world after the UN)

4 Mehmuda Mian, fanatic (see below) muslim BBC trustee etc


Astonishingly, the European Union's high representative for foreign affairs, Catherine Ashton, has also issued a joint statement with the secretaries general of the OIC and the Arab League that "condemn[s] any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to hostility and violence. While fully recognizing freedom of expression, we believe in the importance of respecting all prophets (read Mohammed)" The statement will be understood by many as EU approval of the OIC position that disrespecting any prophet (read Mohammed) is tantamount to advocacy of religious hatred and should be prohibited by states that have ratified the ICCPR



Why not send islam back instead of Abu Qatada?!


It's much easier to be on the side of islamofascism (or blink it) than to defend Human Rights because islam uses group terror against individuals (on the streets as well as in the UN etc).

According to Human Rights, Abu Qatada shouldn't be handed over to islamofascists although he himself is an islamofascist. However, because he supports an evil ideology that is against Human Rights (Koran, Sharia, Mohammed, OIC/Cairo declaration) he is a criminal.

Klevius important statement to ignorant readers:

1) Islam is really the worst ideological crime ever against humanity. The totally incomprehensible amount of suffering, murder and genocides not only caused by and made possible by but also "defended" by Koranic ideology throughout more than a Millennium by far exceeds the numbers of any other ideologically underpinned crimes.

2) Today islam and muslims are represented by OIC which, by gathering a voting bloc mainly based on countries with the worst Human Rights records, has managed not only to become the most powerful force in UN (which was created for the purpose of keeping such evil forces at bay) but also to completely step aside of any Human Rights obligation that doesn't fit their evil agenda (Sharia in the form of the Cairo declaration). Moreover, via the treacherous "islamophobia"/religious "tolerance" (totalitarian Sharia islam has nothing to do with religion in its conventional meaning) Saudi based OIC is successfully criminalizing criticism against the worst crime ever as "religious hatred" and "blasphemy".


Islamofascism at the heart of BBC

Although BBC's support for islamofascism/Sharia is mind blowing for a critical and informed ear/eye, ordinary people are almost completely unaware of the depth of BBC's deception although information is freely available. This is because of BBC's sly and almost sophisticated jihad against its stated policy:

"We (BBC) must not knowingly and materially mislead our audiences with our content."

However, this aim is continuously and seriously violated by BBC. Just think about one example, i.e. that Klevius information about OIC (all muslim's world organization) in accuracy and content easily outperforms the world's biggest news broadcaster (see Klevius beats BBC when it comes to true reporting about OIC!).

BBC is not firstly an organization for its audience but a political tool for supporting and protecting Saudi steered islamofascism for the purpose of gaining political and financial access to Mideastern oil money.
This has gone so far so BBC will expand its compulsory fee to also cover Arabic broadcasting in Mideast etc.



 Mehmuda Mian, muslim BBC trustee and commissioner of the Independent Police Complaints Commission clearly sides for Sharia and therefore against Human Rights: “Being a muslim is the bedrock of my existence. Islam is about peace and justice, though unfortunately some of those precepts have been taken over and there are some very odd views as to what Islam means".


obu-investigators.com (2005): Mehmuda Mian Pritchard is the commissioner at the IPCC responsible for the National Crime Squad. She worked for the PCA, the discredited Police Complaints Authority, before the organisation renamed itself to the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission). It is our view, that the IPCC is just a Home Office expediency, all commissioners and key personnel being appointed by the Home Office.

In 2010, Gita Sahgal, a human rights activist and writer, was forced to leave Amnesty International because of the organization's continuing support for the muslim jihadist Moazzam Begg and his islamofascist organization, Cage Prisoners. According to Sahgal, Begg was "Britain's most famous supporter of the Taliban".

Government, non-profit groups and much of the media consider truly secular muslims to be an anomaly; and that by embracing the enlightened muslim voice, opinion-makers fear alienating vast sections of the general muslim population.






 .

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Muslim born OIC Fuhrer Ihsanoglu and US "president"/apostate(?!) Barakeh Hussain Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) both support islamofascism and muslim atrocities against Buddhists


To understand Myanmar/Burma you need to understand islam itself and muslim atrocities against Buddhists and others (will the Afgan Buddha statues be restored before even the Pyramids are destroyed by muslims?)


A one way ideology boosted by jihadism

What's your tolerance for an ideology that doesn't tolerate other ideologies and which has the worst historical track record of any known ideology, approves of slavery and sex apartheid, and says it's the best for mankind while simultaneously declaring that Human Rights that don't fit the ideology constitute a crime? An ideology that says that children to its male members reproduced by up to four wives simultaneously automatically become involuntary members and the possession of the father but that abandoning the ideology is considered the worst of crimes.

The global muslim “fertility war” which is made possible by the aid of islam's most basic tenets and sex segregation is furthermore assisted by violent or non-violent jihad against non-muslims and women.

However, although slavery in general has been the historical staple resource (which fact hasn't been helpful in avoiding anti-semitism) the key element has always been sex slavery.


From the Jewish slaughter of Canaanites to the muslim slaughter of Jews


It all started with the deeply racist idea about "God's chosen people". And to really emphasize this racist approach this "God" had to be the only "true" god. "Monotheism" is an utter oxymoron but still popular because of its usefulness.

However, when the Jewish Vagina (via Jews believing in Jesus) turned into the muslim Penis it started a development that ended in less than 10 Million Jews and more than 1.5 Billion muslims.

Such an elaborate ideological tool for expansionism as islam is by most standards (such as e.g. Human Rights) to be considered evil. And this is why islam has to be protected from itself via hypocritical bigotry and self denial.


-->
Sam Westrop: In 2011, the British Government's review of the PREVENT program, the state-funded counter-extremism initiative, declared that providing taxpayers' money to moderate Islamists in order to calm the "extreme" Islamists had not worked all that well. The Government's report noted that "there have been cases where groups whom we would now consider to support an extremist ideology have received funding." This came as no surprise to leading counter-extremism activists, who have long-warned about Islamist organizations taking advantage of Government funding for "interfaith" schemes – money and moral legitimacy to which extremists quickly sign-up in order to shroud their more nefarious activities.
In 2008, the Conservative MP Paul Goodman questioned the British government's support for the Lokahi Foundation, which runs a University interfaith project named Campusalam. Several hundred thousand pounds of taxpayers' money was given to the Foundation, which has previously associated itself with Muslim Brotherhood groups such as the Cordoba Foundation and IslamExpo. The Islamist academic Tariq Ramadan, whom the US has previously refused a visa, is on Lokahi's advisory board. The journalist Lee Smith has described Mr Ramadan – who has referred to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, Bali and Madrid as nothing more than "interventions" -- as a cold-blooded Islamist whose "cry of death to the West is a quieter and gentler jihad, but it's still jihad."
It is not just Government that is susceptible to exploitation. Rabbi Wittenberg, a prominent Jewish leader in Britain, recently defended his interfaith work with the East London Mosque and an interfaith group called London Citizens. The deputy chair of London Citizens is Junaid Ahmed, who has referred to senior Hamas terrorist Ismail Haniyeh as "our leader".
As for the East London Mosque, it is considered by many critics to be one of the most extreme religious institutions in Europe: one does not have to look far back through its events to find speakers who denounce women, Jews and homosexuals. Featured guests have included Sheikh Saad al-Beraik, who once stated:
"Muslim Brothers in Palestine, do not have any mercy neither compassion on the Jews, their blood, their money, their flesh. Their women are yours to take, legitimately. God made them yours. Why don't you enslave their women? Why don't you wage jihad? Why don't you pillage them?"
Wittenberg responded to criticism of his collaboration with these groups by opining, "We have to take risks to engage with each other. The Jewish community will be far weaker if we all shelter within a comfort zone labeled 'They all hate us out there'."


Klevius comment: This is what you get with the lack of a long overdue serious reflection about "monotheism".  Instead of floaters like Karen Armstrong and other women bowing "sacred" "god" ordered sexism, we need to put "god" himself on trial. 

Jews and muslims usually cooperated in slave rading/trading hence explaining occasions of "peaceful coexistence".

Circumcision is the oldest Jewish ritual and its sole purpose was to hinder masturbation and support rapetivism so that as many girls/women got pregnant as possible while the offspring stayed Jewish.


This is what Klevius wrote 2005:

Islam's genocide attempt and enslavement of the Romas
The Roma ancestors in India were enslaved and deported by islam some thousand years ago. One of the worst islamic slave raiders/traders, when it comes to Romas, being Mahmoud of Ghazna. But although this part of the Roma history is the most important one it is less known/talked about. Why is that? The stupid but widespread blinking of what islam really stands for!The deceptive illusion/projection of "a nice islam"
In Karen Armstrong's The History of God (1993 - the same year World Trade Center got its first Islamic terror attack!) nothing at all is said about the violent spreading and nature of islam (see battle/conquest timeline), although she spends 40 pages praising Mohammad and the Koran! This continuing tunnel vision is very typical for our time! Especially many women seem to appreciate the in-built sexism in islam, perhaps because it offers a convenient excuse for not daring to really step outside (allow others to step outside)a limiting sex segregation.


Islam has destroyed everything non-islamic in its way because islam lacks anything to show itself due to its empty history


There never was any grave of Mohammed etc. That's why the Saudis have deliberately erased all traces of non-existing islamic "remains" and instead focused on the pagan Kaaba as the idol of the world's muslims combined with the Mina hate mongering stones.













By confusing islam with other forms of monotheist religions that aren't political ideologies islam has been able to get protection from Human Rights it hates and laws it wants to replace with Sharia.



The history of muslims in Myanmar is equally bloody and intrusive as in India and elsewhere



Suu Kyi has remained cautiously silent on the Rohingya muslims.Could the explanation be that the media picture presented is quite the opposite to the real problem, namely islam?

Some 80 to 90 died in recent clashes after a long period of muslim atrocities (including rapes) against Buddhists. Rohingyas launched the June 8 riot after their Friday prayer.


Evil racist/sexist islam is the root problem - applauded by islamofascist OIC and its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu


The root problem started with Arab slave raiders/traders some 1300 years ago (Dear reader, please educate yourself about the incomprehensible muslim atrocities in India/Bengali etc).

However, a more recent root is to be found when in 1946 (i.e. after the 1942 massacres committed by muslims) Bengalis requested self-rule under Sharia and wanted the area they occupied to belong to Pakistan.

In the last two years muslims have tried to chase Arakanese away from town in their own country by traumatizing them with a series of attack on Arakanese villages, not to mention gang rape and murder. Eventually Muslims launched the riot on June 8, 2012 when Arakanese people finally stood up and punished the rapists.

According to Mr.Kaiser, the Bangladesh Ambassador to Burma , in 1975 "there were upward of ½ million Bangalee trespassers in Arakan" and that the Burmese government had "some right" to eject over 500,000 "Bangalee trespassers" as the Ambassador described them - not "Rohingyas". Mr Kaiser subsequently became Bangladesh Ambassador to the UN and was Chairman of the UN Security Council for October 1979.

1984 the Citizenship Act was enacted with the aim to protect national security as the country is situated next to the world's most populous countries.

"Buthidaung, Burma : Some remote Buddhist villages in southern Buthidaung Township, 80 miles north of Sittwe, are under threat of damage due to the rampant Muslim robbers in the area, report local people widely.

A villager in Kwe Gomaw Village said, "The authority is not protecting our village right now. So many families are thinking of moving to more safe places like downtown Buthidaung, where many army battalions are stationed."

The village of Kwe Gomaw is located near Nyung Chaung Nasaka outpost in southern Buthidaung Township, and the village was hit by dacoits (muslim bandits) on 1 January, 2011.

"At 12 pm on 1 January, around 30 armed Muslim robbers surrounded our village. After that the robbers entered our village and robbed property from all the houses one by one. When a villager refused to give over his property, a robber beat him with his gun and injured his head. Properties worth 3 million kyat were taken by the robbers," the villager said.

After the robbers left the village, they hit another Buddhist village in the area, Thein Daung Byint, where many people of the Dynet tribes are living.

During the second attack, the village chairman's wife was severely wounded when some of the robbers opened fire on villagers who were trying to fight back against them. The woman is now hospitalized in Buthidaung in critical condition, although her condition is improving.

A villager from Thein Daung Byint said, "We are now afraid to live in our village because we have no safety, despite that our village is located in inner Buthidaung Township, not in the border area. Moreover, when we informed the Nasaka officers about the robber, the officers beat us because were unable to defend ourselves against the robbers. Now we are facing many difficulties living in our village."

During December, 2010, a large robbery also took place in Shwet Bying Village under Zaydi Bying circle in Rathidaung Township. The villagers lost 30 million kyat of property. The robbery was also committed by a group of armed Muslim dacoits.

The Muslim robbers have never robbed any Muslim villages in the area, having so far only struck Buddhist villages in Buthidaung Township. Because of this, many ordinary citizens, including those in the Muslim community, are anxious that the robberies might foment conflict and lead to riots among the people in the area."


They looked like East Indians, dressed like East Indians, were Muslims, did not speak the same language and did not assimilate with the locals who were Buddhists. This failure to assimilate or even dress similarly persists today and is a root cause of the problem, as it is in many places with Muslim people. They act like a state within a state,

In 1942 there was a Muslim uprising, followed by a lot of killing back and forth. In 1947 the “Bengali-Muslims’ Mujahid Insurgen-cy” as it is called by the Burmese, started after the central government refused to grant a separate Muslim state in Rakhine Pro-vence. Being better armed with WWII surplus, the Muslims killed many Burmese and destroyed villages in the north of the Pro-vence, near Bengal.

Martial Law was declared in 1948. During the uprising some of the Muslims flew the Pakistani flag and attempted to separate the northern provinces from Burma. The matter finally came to a head when some British government officials were murdered and the Burma Rifles were sent in. They decimated the Bengalis in combat.

To add sauce, the current Rohingya (Mujahid) political party was founded by elders who supported Burma jihad and separation ef-fort in 1947, which is hardly reassuring to the Burmese. Further-more, notwithstanding their defeat in 1948, a militant group auda-ciously continued calling themselves "Mujahids."

Myanmar does not recognize them as citizens or one of the 135 recognized ethnic groups living in the country. Much of this is rooted in their heritage in East Bengal, now called Bangladesh. Though many Rohingya have only known life in Myanmar, they are viewed by Rakhine's estimated three million Buddhists as intruders from across the border.

According to Human Rights Watch, the country's laws discriminate against the Rohingya, infringing on their rights to freedom of movement, education, and employment. They are denied land and property rights and ownership. The land on which they live can be taken away at any given time.
HRW has also accused security forces of opening fire on the Rohingya population during the recent wave of violence -- an accusation denied by the government.


What are the authorities doing?


In August, Myanmar's president, Thein Sein, announced that an internal commission, including representatives from different political parties and religious organizations, had been formed to investigate the recent sectarian violence -- a move welcomed by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
"This commission is comprised of a representative cross-section of national figures in the country," Ban said in a statement. "It could make important contributions to restoring peace and harmony in the state and in creating a conducive environment for a more inclusive way forward to tackle the underlying causes of the violence, including the condition of the Muslim communities in Rakhine."

President Sein discussed the situation with Ban during the U.N. General Assembly in New York in September, pledging to "address the root causes of the tensions," according to a U.N. spokesman.

The move followed Sein's warning in June that the ongoing ethnic strife could harm Myanmar's development and stability as it continues its rehabilitation as a fledgling democracy.


What is the world saying?


Tomas Quintana, the U.N.'s human rights rapporteur for Myanmar, in August called for an independent investigation into allegations that authorities are using excessive force and committing other human rights violations while trying to restore order in Rakhine state.

Quintana said such an investigation was needed to guarantee accountability.
"Reconciliation will not be possible without this, and exaggerations and distortions will fill the vacuum to further fuel distrust and tensions between communities," he said.

Thousands of Rohingya have attempted to flee the unrest, with neighboring Bangladesh the main destination. But many have been turned away by the authorities.

Bangladesh has reinforced its border, amassing troops and security officials along the River Naf, which provides a natural boundary between the two countries, where rickety fishing boats filled with refugees attempt to cross over.
In June, Bangladeshi Foreign Minister Dipu Moni said her country was not willing to give shelter to anymore refugees, despite international calls to open its borders. "We're already burdened with thousands of Rohingya refugees staying in Bangladesh and we don't want anymore," she said.

Human Rights Watch says tens of thousands of Rohingya refugees are currently staying in makeshift camps in Bangladesh, with many living in conditions that seasoned aid workers have described as "the worst they have ever seen."
According to the rights group, the inhabitants face overcrowding, shortages of food leading to widespread malnourishment among the children, a lack of clean water and sanitation resulting in disease, and restrictions on movement coupled with extortion and human rights abuses.



Other comments


Bluhorizon
11/5/2012 8:23 PM EST
They remained active in several areas, trying to wrest northern Rakhine townships from Burma and become part of Pakistan. So, the matter of insurrection never quite went away.

Matters were finally brought to a head by the increasing Islamifi-cation of a few Roihynga, furthering the gap between the two cul-tures. Since matters were always sensitive, it did not take many bad apples to spoil everything and in a population of maybe 700,000 there were the inevitable hot-heads.

Many Rakhine Burmese believe there is a plan is to “convert us all to Islam and take over Rakhine.” There have been attacks on the Buddhists, forced conversions of some of their women, threats and attempts to expand Islamic influence, unsettlingly similar to what happened in the late 1940s. Some accuse Saudi fundamentalists of arming the region’s newly politicized Islamists to inspire jihad. Others accuse aide organizations of taking money from the Saudis and therefore are biased against the Buddhists. And of course the Roihynga have many similar claims of mistreatment and injustice.

The Rohingya seem to be the victim in this matter and clearly they are the ones currently persecuted. But a strong sympathetic case can be also be made for the native residents of Rakhine Provence, who are poor and had to endure virtually unrestricted illegal immigration of hundreds of thousands, approaching a million even poorer people from Bengal and endure several uprisings and jihad. The huge population increase of the Muslims has exacerbated the situation. As you can see, this problem and its roots are complex but the hatred and vehemence are strangely reminiscent of the Israeli-Palestine conflict.

It is easy for armchair diplomats to make accusations one way or the other but placing blame now is clearly a matter of opinion, not fact. In this case (as is so often the case) there is plenty of blame to go around and no good solution in sight. Neighboring Bangla-desh has refugees up to the eyeballs and will take no more. There is no place for the Roihynga to go and it is unlikely that they can ever return to their homes. Of course the very worst of all the bad choices would be jihad.

Bluhorizon
11/5/2012 8:22 PM EST
The article is the view of a Pakistani and as is so often the case the oppressed Muslims are shrouded in the mantel of the belligerent victim--but the root causes of the problem are not really addressed.

My first experience in the area of West Burma began in 2003 when I went there for WHO to administer TB tests. Coming from Thailand, it was graphic how decidedly poorer the people in W Burma were compared to Thailand. From the first I could see that the Roihynga were a distinct group, which dressed and looked different from the native Burmese.

The Rohingya have immigrated from Bengal, SW India, later called East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, for at least 150 years and this was made easy by lack of border enforcement. Originally called "Bengali-Muslims", the name "Rohingya" came from antiquity and was adopted about 1960 as a way of identifying themselves as an ethnic group rather than immigrants.

Who is a citizen is at this point quite impossible to say. Burma is a country that does not confer automatic citizenship on people borne of immigrants and the Burmese do not accept Roihybnga as citizens.

This attitude about citizenship may be in conflict with western standards but most Muslim countries and some others also do not confer citizenship automatically upon birth. A 1984 law formally excluded the Rohingya as one of the country's 135 ethnicities, meaning most are denied basic civil rights and are not recognized as citizens.

One might say the Bengalis were "invited" into Burma by lack of border enforcement, but things never went well from the start. They looked like East Indians, dressed like East Indians, were Muslims, did not speak the same language and did not assimilate with the locals who were Buddhists. This failure to assimilate or even dress similarly persists today and is a root cause of the problem, as it is in many places with Muslim people. They act like a state within a state,

































.

.


.

.

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Sex abuse (i.e. Sharia) supporting BBC (Savile & Co) takes side with the social state and false stats

Why has BBC been so uninterested in child sexual abuse committed by muslim pedophiles/sex offenders? Could BBC's own Sir pedophile/sex offender Savile give a hint?


In an effort to distract attention from itself BBC now uses its airtime (paid by compulsory fees/taxes from every Brit no matter they like or hate BBC) to libel parents with deeply misleading stats. Just as in the heydays of incest hysteria that ended up in the notorious Cleveland scandal in the 1980's when a state trained "expert" stole over hundred children from their innocent parents just because the reflex/response to the "expert's" finger in the anus of the poor children happened to indicate "incest" according to a psycho-hoax in fashion at the time.

As Klevius happens to be the only one who has critically scrutinized stats about child sexual abuse stats and their usage, please educate yourself below.
 .


Sir pedophile/sex offender Jimmy Savile, "Friend of all"


Longterm BBC celebrity and pedophile/sex offender Sir Jim Savile and his friend prince Charles.


.

.








And here with England's worst serial sex murderer Peter Sutcliffe (to the left)


Britain's worst serial sex murderer/offender Sutcliffe: "Savile visited a lot"


Sutcliffe murdered his third victim, Irene Richardson, mere yards from Savile’s flat in Roundhay, Leeds, in 1977

Detective John Stainthorpe, who worked for the West Yorkshire force for more than 40 years: "When the Ripper was really active one of the suspects put forward by members of the public was Jimmy Savile".


Andy Dawson: In a tape that has been leaked to a The Sun, Sutcliffe waxes lyrical about the bandy-legged child-bothering bastard, saying: "I can’t fault him from my experiences of what he was like. I don’t care what these people who are coming out of the woodwork are saying."

Yeah, to be fair pal, you probably can’t fault him because you’re a hairy, overweight, psychologically-broken killer and not the kind of vulnerable, star-struck 13-year-old girl that Savile was more into.

This is from a man who savaged more than a dozen living, breathing women – women who were unable to hit back against him. It’s hard to decide what is more deranged – his views, or the fact that they’re deemed worthy of being aired in the public domain.


Klevius comment: Despite his extensive interest in children Sir BBC "friend of all" Savile, didn't manage to father any himself. It's a little bit like the social state (as described in Angels of Antichrist) which has an extensive interest in children but constantly ends up abusing them.


Unbiased research confirms that the worst threat to children is the social state - not the parents


Klevius 'Ekot om Incest' (The Echo of Incest) is the only existing honest and unbiased research on the research about incest prevalence. Why is that? Simply because most such research used to be made for the purpose of shaming parents as possible likely offenders although the truth is that bio-parents (at least in the West) were the least likely culprits. A notable exception was the Finnish researcher Pentti Sariola who, in the late 1980's, made the most extensive and non-biased mapping of prevalence of sexual abuse reported by 15-16 year olds (see table below).

For English speakers please read Angels of Antichrist the most important sociological paper from the last Century.







.





























Any sort of as sexual experienced situation among children in bio-families had a prevalence of less than 0,07% based on Klevius reading of Sariola whereas an American study (Russel) managed to propose 67% by stretching and including all family relations (including step fathers) and also including offenders who were children themselves. But the sky high numbers in this latter report used to be happily referred to as "proof" about the dangerous parents, and constantly giving the impression that it was about bio-parents*.

Klevius research departed from a Swedish news program (Ekot) which during 18 programs threw suspicion against normal families in an effort to justify the enormous sum that taxpayers contributed to the Swedish social state. And due to this and previous state propaganda an unknown number of innocent bio-parents were jailed and the children placed in state institutions were their lives were usually destroyed at an early age and at a cost beyond belief.

* in Klevius work as a solicitor and researcher dealing with these kind of social state cases a repeated pattern was accused parents who asked: "Why me, why not the crazy neighbor parent"? This sort of reaction combined with an unfounded trust in the social state clearly paves the way for a huge amount of horrifying atrocities committed under the flag "in the best interest of the child" (i.e. in the best interest of the state bureaucracy and its commercial allies). Carefully read Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship and Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis combined with Klevius psychosocial Freud time-line and you will never be naive about the social state again). 







 .






Thursday, November 01, 2012

US votes for Sharia - but how many Americans know it for a fact?


The sitting "president" (you can't be a US President if you are a Sharia following muslim or if you "respect" islam's disrespect for the US Constitution and Human Rights) welcomes Sharia but is silent about it (as is media) while the challenger (picked by Sharia supporting media) is - well, also silent.

In Klevius assessment it's just a minor concern about his extremely low and hypocritical moral that this Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) for some 20 years regularly visited a black religious supremacist movement and that he applauded its disgusting racist leader Jeremy Wright. What is much more serious is his connections throughout his life with some of the world's worst islamofascists and his relentless open (since at least his Cairo speech) pursuit for Sharia.

The spring of Sharia and fall of US

Islam is Sharia and Sharia is a legal system that covers all aspects of life and makes criticism of itself a crime - meaning Human Rights not accepted by islam may be criminalized as "denigrating" islam or being "blasphemic"! 

.

 Muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" supports Sharia but was truly confused when his Saudi master supported Mubarak

According to the Saudi state press agency Saudi "king" Abdullah supported Mubarak. Muslim born Mr X "president's" big idol and master reportedly said: "No Arab or muslim can bear that some people, in the name of freedom of expression, have infiltrated Egypt to destabilize its security. Saudi Arabia stands resolutely with the government and brotherly people of Egypt." Sheikh Khaled Al Khalifa (Bahrain) also agrees with Mubarak: “Egypt will settle and genuinely move forward. What will happen in the next few days will prove that everyone is serious about the stability of Egypt."

 Some two years ago Klevius wrote:

The worst "president" ever. Good at selling himself, a disaster for USA and the free world.

Klevius comment: The main reason Muslim Brotherhood wants Mubarak to go is neither his for African leaders so typical corruption etc., nor his age, but rather the only good thing Mubarak stands for, namely not to let islam into politics. And the Saudi hate mongering Abdullah, the "guardian of islam", really shows off his sleezyness bigotry and hypocrisy, doesn't he! The last thing he wants to happen to Egypt is its takeover by pious muslim brothers. Getting too close to home, does it! Surrounded by muslim revolutionaries, who's next. And Mr X "president's" $60 Billion worth of weaponry hasn't been delivered as yet.  Has the good old wahhabi caliph got smitten by some islamophobia! An echo of the origin of islam...



Religious persecution in Austria - and a really nutty judge


Auster: In October 2010 Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolf of Austria was indicted for making the most generic sorts of criticisms of Islam that any Islam critic might make. In February 2011 she was convicted of “denigration” of Islam for having said that the Muhammad “had a thing for little girls.” Now her conviction has been upheld. On one hand, as I’ve argued before, it is silly for Islam critics to call Muhammad a “pedophile,” or say that he had a “thing” for little girls, because the context of his marriage to Aisha was entirely different from what those terms suggest to modern ears (Klevius comment: Quite the contrary! Historical facts combined with islamic teachings clearly shows that this type of sex-slavery laid at the base of islam for the same ultimate purpose as now, namely to satisfy muslim men and, through Sharia sex-apartheid, to spread islam faster than other systems). On the other hand, it is simply inevitable that modern people will object to the fact that this man—whose behavior is the model for all Muslims—married a nine year old girl, and it is inevitable that they will express their objections. And this normal expression of a normal opinion is now against the law in Europe.

As Diana West explains, Wolf has not been convicted for stating the fact (which is uncontested by the court ) that Muhammad had sexual relations with a girl; she has been convicted for disapproving of Muhammad for having such relations. The court found that it is wrong “to look down on sex with children if the alleged perp, centuries ago, was the Islamic prophet.” West continues: As Henrik Rader Clausen put it, live-blogging the proceedings for the blog Gates of Vienna, Elisabeth, in the court’s eyes, expressed “an excess of opinion that can not be tolerated. It is a ridiculing that cannot be justified.” Cannot be tolerated, cannot be justified by whom, by what? The answer is by Islamic law. It is literally against Islamic law to criticize or expose Islam or its prophet (Muhammad) in any adverse way. This prohibition against freedom of conscience is now part of Austrian law as well. That the verdict upheld against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff actually imperils the most innocent and vulnerable among us—little girls whose molestation the courts have implicitly excused as a religious rite—only underscores the depravity of the Vienna high court….


Judge Leo Levnaic-Iwanski upheld the verdict of the lower court, which convicted Elisabeth on the charge of “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion” (Klevius comment: Why didn't her defense make a case of the fact that islam isn't a religion in any conventional meaning - at least not the islam that she criticized?!) The lower court matter was instigated by a reporter from leftist Austrian Magazine, NEWS, concerning Wolff’s remarks at a public lecture about Mohammed’s pedophilia, “having a thing about young girls." That was a reference to  the Sunnah’s account of  Mohammed’s consummation of a marriage with Aisha at age nine, one of his nine wives.  When the trial resumed on February 15, 2011, Sabaditsch-Wolff was exonerated of the first charge of "incitement" because the court found that here statements were not made in a "provocative" manner. But Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted of the second charge against her, namely "denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion," according to Section 188 of the Austrian Criminal Code. The judge ruled that Sabaditsch-Wolff committed a crime by stating in her seminars about Islam that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was a pedophile (Sabaditsch-Wolff's actual words were "Mohammed had a thing for little girls.")


Talking about sexist hypocrisy boosted by Western oil money via evil racist and sexist backward islam


The judge rationalized that Mohammed's sexual contact with nine-year-old Aisha could not be considered pedophilia because Mohammed continued his marriage to Aisha until his death. According to this line of thinking, Mohammed had no exclusive desire for underage girls; he was also attracted to older females because Aisha was 18 years old when Mohammed died.

Klevius comment: This is why Klevius describes one of BBC's top sex groomers, Sir Jimmy Savile, 'pedophile/sex offender'!


.



























Vienna (the city of lunatic Freud - see Klevius psychosocial Freud timeline) in Austria is now Europe's center for Saudi Wahhabi islamofascism against Human Rights


derStandard.at: Nevertheless, the Saudi Abdullah center will be financed by the Saudi Arabian government.

Rabbi David Rosen: Yes, the institute’s building belongs to the Saudis and the center has been named after King Abdullah. However, that is something we are all in favor of, also the Christian representatives and myself, simply because it is definitely a positive development for Saudi Arabia to stand up for religious tolerance and dialogue (no, it's definitely not according to Sharia!). Saudi Arabia is the bedrock state of Islam, so to speak. So if that state shows commitment to the process of religious freedom, we would be stupid not to encourage that development. For the Jewish community it is of crucial importance to reduce biases and prejudices. We are the eternal minority and will always be a minority. Therefore, interreligious understanding is absolutely vital for our wellbeing.



derStandard.at: Will women’s rights be one of the topics you will address?

Rabbi David Rosen: I very much hope so. We have discussed this and I haven’t seen any negative reactions. At least one woman will be on the board – the representative of the Buddhist community. Of course there are striking differences in opinion on this. But I think you could not be a credible institution of interreligious dialogue if you ignored women’s rights in particular and human rights in general.

Klevius clarification to this ignorant (?!) misinformation: In islam women are robbed of Human Rights and hence not equal to muslim men.This is because THERE ARE NO HUMAN RIGHTS IN ISLAM, only Sharia! This undeniable fact isn't altered by the cosmetic "human rights in islam" which actually means the opposite, i.e. Sharia.


The FPÖ (Austrian Freedom Party) and the Greens voted against it. They argued that there’s no religious freedom in Saudi Arabia. The former justice minister Bandion-Ortner is supposed to be the deputy general secretary. The “King Abdullah Center” for interreligious and intercultural dialogue” is welcomed in Austria. The national assembly reached an agreement on Friday afternoon against the negative votes of the FPÖ and the Greens to provide this center with the status of legal personality, which is to be established in Vienna. This is controversial mainly because it is financed by Saudi Arabia. The FPÖ wants among others the renaming of the center, which is to be named after the saudi king, for the nature of the regime in Saudi Arabia is not compatible with an institution for religious dialogue. The FPÖ also considers that this institution is financilly not sustainable on the long term. However. they spoke in favor of the centrum while being in the committee. The Greens had been always against it, with their representative Alev Korun saying that it would be to put the fox in charge of the henhouse, if one sees how human rights and freedom of religion are trodded upon The SPÖ and the ÖVP defend the decision The ÖVP (Austrian People’s Party) defended (the plan for) the centrum and rebuked these arguments saying that dialogue is indispensable, and Vienna should remain a city of dialogue. Representative Reinhold Lopatka said that the wahhabis (the leading group in Saudi Arabia) should also not be excluded. The SPÖ (Austrian Socialist Party) representative Hannes Weninger understood concerns that the center could be used as a cover for the regime in Riyad, but the general declaration of human rights and freedom of religion in the preamble of the institute’s declaration is also to be taken into consideration.

Klevius clarification: Would you believe you really red this utter nonsense. Again, Saudi based OIC's Cairo declaration (Sharia) clearly states that no Human Right that conflicts Sharia is acceptable. This means that the Austrian based Saudi islamofascist dictator "king's" Vienna center is nothing else than an other tool for protecting islam's growth in Europe until it can practice its Sharia openly and in full.



 . .