Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Sunday, October 31, 2010
BBC tries to cover up that Mohammed is the most common boys name in England, while Klevius tells you why!
ALWAYS WHEN READING KLEVIUS, KEEP IN MIND THAT OIC (all the world's islamic states, incl the "world Umma"!) HAS AGREED ON A "MODERN" SHARIA THAT VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS ON THEIR MOST CENTRAL PART, THE FREEDOM OF GIRLS/WOMEN!
This moron represents EXACTLY the same islam now as he did when he was invited to the White House as a "moderate muslim"! Klevius comment: This evil true muslim represents evil true islam! A "reformed" islam isn't just a treacherous joke, it feeds islamic evilness. There's only a fascist/totalitarian islam out there, and a "reformed" islam would be equally dead as Monthy Pyton's parrot!
Klevius: Muslim names are Sharia traps against possible apostates!
Elijah Abraham (an ex-muslim from Iraq): Born in a Muslim family, you really have no choice but to be a Muslim. If a child is born to Muslim parents, according to Islamic law, he is immediately a Muslim. And that locks that human being — be it a boy or girl — into Islam. Whether he grows up knowing what Islam is all about — that’s really secondary. Of course, it would make the parents happy if that child grows up and knows everything about Islam, becomes an Imam, or whatever he does to advance Islam. But he will learn about Islam from his parents, from society, from school, from the mosque if his father takes him to the mosque, from the culture. Islam is a way of life. It’s not like here in America. Christianity, or whatever faith that you have here in America, is a personal thing. That’s why they don’t have “separation between Islam and State.”
As a schoolboy Mr X "president" got his islamic Koran teaching in an Indonesian madrasa. Obama's first and middle names are Arabic Muslim names meaning 'a nice horse for Mohammed', and quite suitable for a guy who sits in the lap of Mohammed's "guardians", the Saudi islamofascists, isn't it!
BBC tries to cover up the embarrassing fact that the most common name for newborn boys in England is now Mohammed. On BBC's list Mohammed is treacherously placed on the 16th place through cheating the public (i.e. those who pay for BBC by compulsion) by not counting the different spellings of the name.
And the islamic terror from Yemen is most likely masterminded by a "moderate" muslim, Anwar al-Awlaki, who was even invited to the White House after 9/11 because of his "moderation", and later freed from prosecution by Mr X "president's" folk (Gaouette, Holder, and a Saudi called Bandar!
al Awlaki was the subject of a terror-finance investigation of the SAAR Group, (funded by the Saudis) whose Jamal Barzinji was/is a prominent donor and supporter of Mr X "president", and who signed the deed for the Dar al-Hijrah mosque where al Awlaki became the Imam. Moreover, the U.S. Census Bureau has been paying Dar al-Hijrah some $23,000/month since 2008 for renting space in his own mosque. To top it all the U.S. State Department has used this islamofascist terrorist mosque as a good example of America’s Muslim community. And indeed, it is!
Doug Hagmann: Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar were two terrorists of the exclusive Saudi cell that attacked the Pentagon, the very location where al Awlaki dined with top military officials. al Awlaki was also associated with a third 9/11 Muslim terrorist during his time at the Saudi-funded Dar-al-Hijrah Mosque and Islamic Center. The telephone number to that mosque was found by investigators in an apartment in the Hamburg, Germany apartment of Ramzi BINALSHIBH, a close associate of Mohammed ATTA and a planner of the 9/11 attacks.
On September 17, 2001, just six days after the 9/11 attacks and four days after former President Bush met with Saudi Prince Bandar on the Truman Balcony at the White House, federal authorities met with and interviewed al Awlaki, eventually releasing him.
Meanwhile, al Awlaki was the subject of a terror-finance investigation of the now defunct SAAR Group, which was funded by the Saudis. It is relevant to note here that an official of the SAAR Group, Jamal Barzinji, a prominent donor and supporter of Barack Obama, signed the deed for the Dar al-Hijrah mosque where al Awlaki was the Imam. And speaking of taxpayer’s money, it was recently reported by the Investigative Project on Terrorism that the U.S. Census Bureau has been paying Dar al-Hijrah about $23,000 per month since November 2008 to rent space in one of its buildings. Also, the U.S. State Department has used the mosque in promotional videos about America’s Muslim community, and sent students from its Foreign Service Institute to Dar al-Hijrah.
Although al Awlaki is of Yemeni descent, it is important to examine and understand the Saudi influence, connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, and Islamic infiltration of all levels of U.S. government.
While the statute of limitations had passed for the misrepresentations made by al Awlaki in 1990, investigators found that he applied for a U.S. passport in Denver several years later. Considering his potential value as a source under interrogation for terrorism plots and terror finance related cases, investigators sought and successfully obtained a felony arrest warrant in 2002 based on the passport fraud. Investigators detained al Awlaki at JFK Airport in New York on October 10, 2002 upon his arrival in the U.S. on Saudi Arabian Airlines Flight 35 from Riyadh. When questioned, he gave investigators his address as 3159 Row Street, Falls Church, Virginia, which is the address of the Dar al Hijrah Islamic Center.
Believing that they were about to take al Awlaki into custody on the felony arrest warrant, investigators were surprised and angered to learn that the arrest warrant was cancelled by David M. Gaouette, the interim U.S. Attorney for Colorado at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Denver the day before al Awlaki was scheduled to arrive in New York. This, despite the fact that al Awlaki was on a terror watch list and that Gaouette was fully briefed on Awlaki’s terror ties. Gaouette has since been appointed to his present post as the U.S. Attorney in Denver by Attorney General Eric Holder.
Pursuant to instructions from Washington, investigators were forced to let al Awlaki go and apologize to him and his family for the detention. A Saudi representative then escorted al Awlaki and his family to their connecting flight to Washington where he reportedly worked for the Saudi Embassy in addition to having residual ties to the Dar al Hijrah Islamic Center.
After a brief stay in the U.S., Anwar al Awlaki was permitted to leave the U.S. without interference. Interestingly, investigators of the 9/11 Commission attempted to locate and interview Anwar al Awlaki in Yemen, but reported that they could not find him.
Fort Hood killer Nidal Malik Hassan
Al Awlaki surfaced again as the inspiration behind Fort Hood killer Nidal Malik Hassan, the guidance counselor to the attempted Christmas Day airline bomber, the thwarted Times Square bomber, and two “alleged” would-be New Jersey Muslim terrorists arrested in June. Thanks to Saudi influence and shameful pandering to Muslim interests by our leaders in Washington, Anwar al Awlaki remains free in Yemen, acting as a terrorist recruiter soliciting attacks against the citizens of the United States.
The super nut of islam supporting nuts?
Ex-muslim Elijah Abraham from Iraq: He (Abdul Rauf, the Imam behind the “Ground Zero Mosque”) is the epitome of the “peaceful Jihad.” It’s like going to Dearborn, Michigan and listening to an imam in a public forum: He's saying one thing in English, and translates it as something entirely different in Arabic. Just like what Yasser Arafat did in 1993: He shook hands with Yitzhak Rabin about peace, then goes back to the Palestinians and he said, “Jihad, Jihad, Jihad. We will not stop until we throw the Jews and all those pigs into the sea.” And he had just signed a peace agreement. So with Rauf, I don't believe anything he says. You go to the Cordoba website, and you'll see that their goal is to advance sharia law in America. There is an unholy alliance between Rauf and the United States government, because the State Department is paying his way to go to the Middle East to raise money. He’s there to raise $100 million. At the same time, that mosque most likely will qualify, and will receive, government funding for that building. Mayor Bloomberg, the State Department, and Obama full force against the American people's wishes to say, “We want that mosque to be there.”
Klevius comment: This must also be seen in the light of the biggest (60 Bilion plus) US weapons deal with the Saudi islamofascists.
Ex-muslim Elijah Abraham: There is no such thing as “moderate Islam.” You mentioned “moderate Muslim” and you need to define what a “moderate Muslim” is. But let’s go back to “moderate Islam”: There is no such thing. Islam is locked on a seventh-century Arabian religion.
Let me redefine Islam: Islam is not really even a religion. That’s a key point. It’s a socio-political system that uses a deity to advance its agenda. Why do you think Islam is doing what it’s doing in the West, and being allowed the freedom to do what it is doing without being confronted? Because Islam passes itself off as a religion and thus, under the Constitution of the United States, has the protection of freedom of religion and therefore the protection of a religion to exist. If the United States finally comes to its senses and acknowledges that Islam is a socio-political system — not a religion, so we need to reclassify what Islam is — then the fight is on. Then we will address Islam just like we addressed Naziism, fascism, communism, and all these ideologies. There are two types of moderate Muslims. First, let us talk about an American. You’ve got a moderate Muslim who really doesn’t know anything about Islam. All he’s doing are the five pillars of Islam the best he can. He prays five times a day. It’s a memorized, repetitive prayer. When I was four years old, my father prayed, and I heard his prayer. We brought him to the United States, and I heard him pray and it was exactly, word for word, what I remembered from when I was a child. All he’s doing is the five pillars of Islam to appease Allah. He’s doing his duty. Now, if he decides to be faithful, and be serious about Islam, and really dig deeper into Islamic theology and history and the life of Mohammed, then he’s got two choices to make. He either becomes “Osama bin Laden,” or leaves Islam for another religion or becomes agnostic. I have some friends who are former jihadists. They used to work for PLO, Hez-bollah, Hamas, and so on. The deeper they dug into Islam, they realized there was something wrong
I grew up with hatred: hatred toward Christianity. I had a lot of Christian neighbors and friends and I loved them, but the Christians I could not separate from Christianity because my community and Islam told me I could not separate America from Christianity ... England from Christianity ... colonialism from Christianity. So that was the hatred — hatred toward the West — imperialism, capitalism, etc. — and hatred toward the Jews, and Israel, and Zionism. Nobody told me why I needed to hate. The culture of hate is just a way of life, and not just hatred toward Christians and Jews, but also toward other factions within Islam. There is no peace.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
US' first muslim born "president" and UK's first islamic republic both respect Sharia racism/sexism!
Read what a Jewish "islamophobe" thinks abt YOUR double standard for islam!
Remember, islam is ALWAYS "under attack" precisely because of its totalitarian nature, which, in turn, is due to its own moral bigotry. No wonder islam needs jihadism and protection from the truth about itself.
What seems so difficult to understand for the ignorant and pathetic lost fascist "soldiers of Allah" (where "Allah" stands for their own ignorance, prejudice, racism and sexism) and their naive (or deliberate, as for example BBC and many muslims) supporters, is that islam is not only a tool for their evilness but the very evilness itself in that islam's original ideology was to make slavery and other Sharia parasitism the very basis for its community, the muslim Umma and Caliphate. So when the British Museum (Neil MacGregor) and BBC together made "the history of the world in hundred objects" the hitherto most disgusting of propaganda efforts after Goebbels, for a mostly ignorant audience, they just presented islam with something that has never been a part of islam itself! There has never been "islamic scientists", "liberation" etc because of the simple reason that the very concepts are oxymorons! And the islamic Arabs' main currency was slaves and Sharia their finance. Just as now Sharia finance goes hand in hand with racist/sexist islamic Sharia law!
Contrary to the islam supporting lies on Wikipedia, BBC etc, in reality historical records clearly prove not only that the so called "transatlantic slave trade" was a tiny fraction of the islamic Arab slave raid/trade system based on Koran/Sharia, but also that the death rate during transportation (not to mention the extreme death rate of eunuchs) was some eight times higher to the muslim Arab slave markets (Mecca etc)! And whereas the "transatlantic" slaves (who were Africans captured by muslims) were mostly males, the muslim Arabs preferred young females (i.e. sex slavery) and eunuchs, which fact doesn't in any sense exclude the fact that the number of islam's plantation slaves to the Mideast hugely outnumbers any figures from other parts of the world (just consider that already in the ninth Century more than half a Million African male slaves tried to free themselves only in the Basra region of today's Iraq)! Also see The Arab slave trade!
The most central tenet for a muslim is to not abandon his "religion" ('his' because only males can be fully muslims according to Koran/Sharia)! If he does it's called apostasy which is considered the worst sin a muslim can commit. Obama's father was muslim born, and muslimhood is ALWAYS spread via the Penis (not via the Vagina as in traditional Judaism - muslim bearing/fostering women are only the kerils for muslimhood, i.e. what Klevius names rapetivism - also consider Klevius definition of religion). So to say that Obama isn't a muslim is quite contrary to anything essential of islam!
To understand anything of this you may first educate yourself with the true meaning of the Negative Rights in the 1948 Human Rights Declaration which stand in sharp opposition to EVERY form of the islamic Sharia that OIC (57 islamic states who now constitute UN's largest voting bloc) is trying to impose on the world while simultaneously trying to hide 1400 years of islamic atrocities against humanity (the worst crime ever, counted in number of victims for a single ideology) by criminalizing the publishing of these crimes as "defamation of religion"!
Klevius clarification for nutheads and other ignorant people: Islamists use to say that Sharia is above human law. Well, Negative Rights are even one step above "divine" law. Why? Simply because unlike human law and "divine" law, Negative Rights LACK human interpretation!
What has the US islamic NY Times Square terrorist Faisal Shahzad in common with the muslim born Mr X US "president" and the islamic republic in central London (Tower Hamlets)?
Klevius answer: None of them respect US and UK law and Human Rights, but ALL of them respect islamic law /Sharia! Faisal Shahzad said what every Sharia supporting muslim agrees on: “I don’t care for the laws of United States”!
Friday, October 22, 2010
Juan Williams (who as so many others got sacked because he criticized muslims): I'm not a bigot. You know the kind of books I've written about the civil rights movement in this country… But when I get on a plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous."
Klevius comment: Just like OIC nations identify themselves as Sharia as opposed to Human Rights!
British BBC (you know the tax paid muslim propaganda apparatus) now propagates for more "Asian" (i.e. meaning muslim in BBC vocabulary) soccer players in the English league!
Klevius comment: Funny, isn't it, that "Asian" footballers come from muslim nations but Asian cars come from non-muslim nations!?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
OIC ambassador to the U.N. Ufuk Goken at American Islamic College (AIC) conference in Chicago recently: "OIC is not an organization with double standards."
Klevius: Yes, you are you bigot/hypocrite! Why else would you propagate for the violation of UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration?! OIC's double standard is called the Cairo Declaration on islamic "human rights" (i.e. Sharia). And for you who, unlike Klevius and Mr X "president", are illiterate in judicial language (or simply too lazy): The main difference between Human Rights and OIC's Sharia declaration is that the latter restricts the freedom of girls/women and opens up for racism because of the islamic infidel criterion that stays in sharp conflict with the equality ideal expressed in Human Rights! And of course, islamic apostasy ban, islamic prohibition for women to marry non-muslims, etc etc! Islam is totalitarian fascism and Sharia its weapon. Add to this that islam is by far the worst ideological crime ever known to history (based on islam's victims) and that OIC tries to make the announcemnet of these selfevident facts a crime!
Islam is today represented by OIC, i.e. a political organization striving for the ultimate violation of Human Rights! And OIC and the Cairo declaration are both initiated by the disgusting Saudi dictator and hate mongerer who also happens to be Mr X "president's" first call and the one he bowed so deeply for!
So let's burn islam!
Learn abt Negative Human Rights, the opposite to islam!
Klevius isn't only your intellectual bedrock in the stream of ignorant (or evil) journalists, politicians etc, he's also your foremost (sad to say) sexpert in a time of misinformation!
And as you know, Klevius is the very first to clearly address sex segregation as the underlying problem of both islam and psychoanalysis! The former as a barbaric brute force, and the latter as a psudo intellectual "sophistication". When sex segregation eventually started to cracking up in the West due to the industrial revolution, a powerful counter force called psychoanalysis emerged (see Klevius Psychosocial Freud timeline).
So when you are bombarded with high flown plattitudes like "sex and religion are essential for your well being" always remember that this is brainwashing! Just relay on yourself and the Negative Human Rights! But a trip to From Klevius without love may also be relieving.
Islam is rapetivism, i.e. sex slavery - originally and now!
Whereas Judaism was spread by the Vagina islam is spread by the Penis. The expansion of islam and the "reward" to its jihadists is made one. And the payer is the woman. So why do women submit to such a disgraceful state of life? This, the female patriarchy, is one of the main questions Klevius has worked with for long. An extraordinary angle of view, knowledge and insight abt the topic, combined with a stunning decrease of knowledge in the general discourse, has resulted in Klevius/KLEVUX being its foremost expert. In this respect it may also be noted that whereas feminists used to naively (or deliberately?) emphasize "women's experience" hence in fact empowering sex segregation, what is needed is rather the male experience of women. Why? Simply because heterosexual attraction (HSA) is a built-in male feature culturally affecting females to such an extent that they are often brainwashed to confuse love with sex. I repeat: All "monotheisms" are abt sex slavery (and in the case of islam combined with infidel slavery and apostasy ban), and Christian polytheism in its original form, was a protest movement against sex slavery.
The female patriarchy (i.e. true feminism*) utilizes that very incompetency (already described by Mary Wollstonecraft >200 yrs ago) that sex segregation has created among women, and then term this incompetency (combined with the power of HSA) "feminine".
* Feminism is sex segregation, i.e. guarding the "feminine". What is usually mistaken as feminism is the strive for equality between the sexes under the false flag of feminism, often because the "feminist" herself doesn't realize the difference (or simply wants to utilize it).
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
She is defending islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity, which is now utilized via OIC by Saudi dictators and others for political and monetary reasons. And she does it (see below) in such a hypocritical (or perhaps just ignorant/confused) way that one wonders what criterion news agencies use when employing people?!
Faisal Shahzad, the pathetic muslim NY bomber in court: "The war with Muslims has just begun." Klevius comment: Doesn't this guy perfectly represent 1400 years of islamic failures and evilness! And he's just following the same Koran as Eleanor Wason's wonderful and kind muslim husband! So does Eleanor Wason have any clue abt the real power center of islam today?
This is OIC's Cairo declaration, i.e. islam's violation of Human Rights. For you who is ignorant abt islam: OIC is the organization of "leaders" from 57 islamist nations who have adopted the Cairo declaration on islamic "human rights" initiated by the Saudi* dictator family. In essence the Cairo declaration makes it possible for islamists to uphold islamic infidel racism and sexist segregation.
* Saudi Arabia's oil export props up the nation's $400bn economy. Btw, islam and Western oil money is the main reason why Made in Arabia is rarer than Made by Arabia (a famous Finnish porcelain factory). This wealth is in the hands of the Saud family and a few other well-positioned families, who receive stipends in relation to their position in the bloodline of Abdul-Aziz. "King" Abdullah’s personal wealth is estimated at $19bn.
"Prince" Al-Waleed bin Talal's (the "king’s" nephew, who is allegedly transferring more money than he could possibly have) Kingdom Holding Company owns part of Citigroup, News Corporation etc major companies. He is also a main figure behind the islamization of Harvard (Mr X "president's" university).
IS THIS THE WORLD'S MOST NAIVE JOURNALIST, OR ARE THERE MANY OF THEM OUT THERE?!
Eleanor Wason, (who has worked as a journalist for news agencies such as Reuters and AFP in London, Milan and Hong Kong, and who is now a freelance writer in Pakistan and currently married with a Paki muslim): I am a white English Christian woman and my partner is a British-Pakistani Muslim who is already a cultural chameleon. - He teaches me about Sufism, reggae and how to cook Persian rice and I have introduced him to French cinema, fresh parmesan and walks in the Cotswolds.
Of course, there are cultural stumbling blocks. I remain proudly ignorant about cricket while my attempt to share with him the joys of Italian cured meats by making him eat goat salami badly backfired.
Klevius comment: Did he forget to teach you abt islamic marriage, inheritance, polygamy, apostasy and custody laws?! And did he forgot to mention that there's an absolute minimi level of rigid sexist sex segregation and infidel racism under which no form of islam can submit without committing suicide and hence not being islam anymore (not to mention that a considerable chunk of the world's muslims would see it as blasphemy against their "religion"!
Eleanor Wason: Why did people openly worry that this new man in my life would have unpleasant views on women and homosexuals when he was the most considerate, open-minded male I had ever met?
Klevius answer: Perhaps because he calls himself a muslim, i.e. one submitting under islam!
Klevius question: Why do you equal the "most considerate, open-minded male I had ever met" with islam, the worst crime ever against humanity?!
Eleanor Wason: Media's tendency to merge Islamism or cultural traditions with the religion itself is very dangerous when many people in the west, particularly in rural areas, have very little knowledge of Islam or even contact with people from ethnic minorities.
Klevius comment: I'm not "rural" (although I'd love to be), nor can I be classified as "having very little knowledge abt islam", or lacking "contact with people from ethnic minorities". However, islamism is quite the opposite to "cultural traditions" (unless these "traditions" happen to be islamism, of course, i.e. Koran inspired) , i.e. what Eleanor Wason names "the religion itself".
Eleanor Wason: The media hype is also unfair when behind the headlines about Koran burning and church bombings real people are making real-life compromises.
So beneath the din of the debate over sharia, burqas and jihad, fundamentalism, multiculturalism and cultural relativism, we'll just be arguing over who does the washing up.
Klevius comment: And by doing this you obscure the disgusting origin and nature of "the religion itself"! And do you have any clue abt Negative Human Rights in the 1948 UN Declaration as well as in the US Constitution?! And how they constitute the absolute difference between islamic evilness (racism against non-muslims and sexism against ALL women and girls) and the Western acceptance of equality as a moral foundation!
Negative rights for a positive future (Klevius 1993).
Klevius latest example of the Jewish civil war that has been on for a couple of Millennias, and which created islam, the ideology that the muslim Penis (not the Jewish Vagina) is the possessor and distributor of muslimhood.
Phil Goodman: It is a sign of these Jewish times that a proud Jew like Pamela Geller is attacked by The Jewish Week. I have read her blog and her earlier writings, and I can’t imagine what any authentic Jew would disagree with. Of course decent people would not build a mosque at Ground Zero. Of course Muslims are the enemies of Jews — it calls for it in the Koran. Of course they will say otherwise when asked. Few will actually blow themselves up among us, but most are happy that some do.
Chancellor Angela Merkel: It's important in regard to islam that the values represented by islam must correspond with our constitution. What applies here is the constitution, not Sharia.
Klevius comment: Islam without Sharia is no islam, simple as that! Most people (most probably incl. Merkel) know it but pretend not to.
Angela Merkel: Our culture is based on Christian and Jewish values and has been for hundreds of years, not to say thousands.
Klevius comment: Not at all! Europe before Christianity used to be completely non-monotheist, and still is to a high degree! As a politician growing up in a Protestant family Merkel should know that Christianity in Europe has been a constant quarrel since the Roman politicians took it over. However, what you might have missed is that original Christianity was quite the opposite to Judaism in that it preached an anti rapetivism message which was soon silenced by the Church patriarchy and military rulers. And as a German Merkel doesn't even dare to acknowledge that Jews were the masters of slave trade, and that this fact explains their strange hate/love relation with islam which originated as a financial and military system based on the taking of slaves.
Thilo Sarrazin was forced to quit the central bank of Germany when he accused muslims of sponging off welfare and refusing to integrate.