Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

Do Americans and Pompeo share the Saudi hate against Shia muslims?

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

BBC supports muslim persecution of Christians etc.

Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis

In the 8 October 2016 Sana'a (Yemen) funeral bombing by Saudi Arabia 155 people were killed and at least 525 more wounded when two airstrikes, about three to eight minutes apart, hit the packed Al Kubra hall. US and UK happy with the Saudis investigating it.

This Swedish muslim MP wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

BBC squeezes in Eng-land cricket in every news report - while UK-land plays borderless Brexit - and football is divided in four UK-lands, Welsh, English, Irish and Scottish players, and two top leagues with whatever players!? Confusing? Not even close to the "British" measuring decaphobia. English isn't "British", it belongs to the world. British stands for imperialism, colonialism, slavery and cooperation with islamofascists.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Islam is the problem - China is the solution.

If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!

* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Why didn't islam go to the Moon?!

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Sex segregation/apartheid (aided by religion and poverty) means over-population.

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!

Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC  News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

Your choice: China high tech or US/UK bombs?

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

US puppet empire UK's Jeremy Hunt wants to double spending on militaristic meddling for US

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?

Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome.

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.

As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.

Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Top emitters

Top emitters

Peter Klevius evolution formula

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad.
However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.
UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China. Klevius: How come that islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc. 'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China, which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!
UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.

If you don't like Klevius (very few do) you may check if it's him or the anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration you can't digest - but which Klevius stubbornly keeps feeding you.

Iran, Corbyn, bin Laden's son etc. - it's more about protecting BBC's poster boy, war criminal and state terrorist Mohammad Salman, than protecting people on the streets from Saudi exported racist islamic hate terror.

Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?

The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to bring back samples to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians.

Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

Do you support Human Rights or sharia?
Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR. For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused.

UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Listen to this Viking about the danger of religion
Martina Big (aka Malaika Kubwa) wanted to be "black". We don't know exactly why. However, fair skinned politicians and media people who support black supremacism, Nation of Islam etc. might consider following her example.

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

Is UK/Saudi cooperation a security threat to EU - and people in UK

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against the people

Politicians against the people

Rule Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

UK PM escapes muslim terror induced by her "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Klevius presents Mitt Romney: Muslim born apostate (?!) "presiodent" Mr X Hussain Obama's 100% guarantee for re-"election"

 Muslim born (apostate?!) Obama's dream candidate is named Mitt Romney! How did this happen Uncle Sam?!

Is this the first time ever that USA completely lacks a challenger to the sitting "president" (who happens to be a muslim by birth who hasn't dared or wanted to openly and honestly commit apostasy! And by being muslim and/or supporting Sharia he is against US Constitution. 

Not only is the apostasy issue about Obama, but more importantly, about the free world and the medieval Leviathan called islam which now again lifts its evil head through oil wells, now under the OIC Caliphate based in Saudi Arabia and led by its Fuhrer (or Caliph as he prefers himself) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu who wants to globally criminalize research about islam's crimes throughout 1400 years (the worst ideological crime ever) and who has already managed to make 57 states to adhere to OIC's Sharia declaration, usually without the people really knowing much about what's going on.

One by one every Sharia critical presidential candidate was effectively put aside by the help of Saudi etc owned media (btw, news agencies are relatively cheap to buy and the islamofascists noted this important and effective way of channeling their evil dirt - if you want a REAL CHANGE support Klevius and you will see a huge difference in almost no time!).

Mitt Romney's making a fool of himself differs from Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) many similar moves in that the latter is always excused by the Sharia compliant media. However, the real disaster with Mitt Romney, an ultra rich religious sectarian, is that he is the first presidential candidate created by the media for the sole purpose of paving the way for the only other candidate! End of democracy and in line with islam where democracy doesn't exist other than as a means for destroying democracy based on Human Rights.


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Shame on you World for accepting evil islam/OIC-fascism and its homophobia and other forms of Sharia sexism!

Coming out of space

Although USA doesn't (as yet - but wait until Mr X "president" Hussain Obama and his muslim brotherhood, CAIR etc bed fellows have introduced Sharia) have a law that, like in islam, makes same-sex friendship, co-habitation etc a crime, the cultural pressure of sex segregation is so heavy that even this remarkably strong and heroic woman didn't dare to challenge it during her lifetime. So what about girös growing up in religiously fanatic sexist families?!

The first American woman in space 1983 (some 20 years after Valentina Tereshkova from the non-religious Russia) Sally Ride, waited until her death to tell the world in an obituary about her partner since 27 years, Tam O'Shaughnessy. Why  has didn't she come out earlier? Was it because of her parents religion? Or was it just because of the still common general homophobia in the sp religious American society. Was she a victim of prayers? However, the worst and most dangerous homophobic threat today is islam represented by OIC and its Egyptian born Turkish Fuhrer/Caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.

An example of OIC's (islam's world representation today) homophobia sanctioned by UN and others

Sebastian Kohn: I previously expressed dismay and pessimism about the “progress” on LGBT rights at the United Nations. Unfortunately my fears were well-founded and the Human Rights Council debate on March 7 on the topic was a circus. Don’t get me wrong, I acknowledge that the debate in and of itself was important (an “historic event” to quote Navi Pillay, the High Commissioner for Human Rights) and I appreciate that there were many states that spoke out in favor of human rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity. But the fact is that the Council is made up of murderous regimes—in particular Saudi Arabia, Mauritania, and Nigeria—and other deeply homophobic states that will fight tooth and nail to keep this off the agenda. On a positive note, Argentina on behalf of Mercosur expressed that they saw the debate as the beginning of a dialogue that will pave the way for reflection on this issue at national level around the world. And the European Union was correct in its assertion that this is not about creating new rights but a matter of ensuring that all human rights can be enjoyed by all human beings, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. The reactions by others were, on the contrary, tragic. First out was Pakistan, speaking on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). To begin with, most OIC states staged a walk-out when the panel started. And when it was time for Pakistan to deliver its remarks it went on a hateful tirade: first, OIC “condemns” the effort of “certain states” to address this issue before the Council on the basis that “controversial notions such as sexual orientation are vague and misleading.” This is followed—no surprise—by the cultural/religious justification: “licentious behavior promoted under the so-called concept of sexual orientation” is against religious dogma. In OIC’s view, bringing sexual orientation into the remit of human rights will lead to “social normalization and legitimization of pedophilia.” When concluding his bigoted and deeply offensive remarks the representative from Pakistan said: “We expect that this panel will be the last of its kind in the context of the Human Rights Council.” As if that was not enough, Mauritania on behalf of the Arab Group felt a need to add more ridiculousness to the discussion. Referring to a “forceful imposition” of this issue on the human rights framework, the Mauritanian delegate explained that the Arab states refused to engage in debate about sexual orientation fearing that doing so would make dialogue seem legitimate. Don’t ask me why Mauritania spoke in the first place if that’s the Arab Group’s policy. Mauritania then added its skewed analysis of why this issue has come up before the Council: some states promote discussion about this in order to deflect from debate about discrimination on the basis of race and religion, especially “migrants and Muslims in Western Countries.” What is Mauritania’s own record on these issues? In 1989 it denationalized and expelled a large part of its black population purely on racial grounds, an issue which has not yet been fully resolved. Moreover, Mauritanian law does not guarantee freedom of religion and belief. On the contrary the constitution states that the religion of the state and, significantly, the people is Islam. And let’s remember that this is a country were slavery was only abolished in 2005 and where thousands of people live in servitude to this day. I could not care less for its analysis. In part because South Africa had organized the panel, Senegal was only able to make remarks on behalf of “most members of the African Group.” Speaking of a “hi-jack of the human rights system,” Senegal referred to the importance of preserving social and cultural norms (read: homophobia) at regional level.

While I can’t hide my disappointment with the state of affairs on this topic, I do hope that the Council finds a way to continue the dialogue. By way of concluding, I quote the Swedish ambassador: “We cannot condone extrajudicial summary or arbitrary executions, honor killings, torture or hate crimes just because some find it uncomfortable to talk about these matters.” Unfortunately, this is exactly what is happening.

Klevius comment: Why aren't people listening?  OIC has adopted Sharia (Cairo Declaration 1990 - yes the one burning at the top of this page) and it clearly states that muslim girls and women shouldn't be protected by Human Rights. That fact cannot just be talked away!

Moreover, because Klevius has realized what so many have missed, namely that islam cannot be reformed without simultaneously committing suicide. This has to do with islam's evil origin which has made it necessary to in absurdum "protect" it from itself (compare the criminalization of "defamation" of islam efforts made by this same Saudi based islamofascist OIC!

 . .

Today starts women's Olympics football but BBC focuses mostly on itself and straight running black men

Sex segregation (or sex apartheid, if you like - voluntary segregation or forced apartheid) is backwardness that the world would be much better off if released from. So why is most of the work left to Klevius?!

Grown up men running 100 m straight forward must be the most pathetic and brain dead of all sports. But for BBC it seems to be a religion. Especially if the runners are all black. Wonder what would happen with BBC's interest in the sport if a Japanese would be the clear champion. But of course, that would never happened because few Japaneses are interested in. It's like boosting about having the straightest paper in front of an Origami team. Every sport, even 100/110m hurdles needs a lot more brain work to perform.

Btw, be sure that today's 100m results and body shapes will look laughable in a not too far off future!
Consider e.g. these old athletes who performed even better when corrected for the fact that they run on sand and with much less training and physiological information!

Armin Hari, the world's fastest sprinter 1960 (10,0 on sand!)

Here with Jesse Owens. Note the difference in size.

And here the skinny Wilma Rudolph 1960 (woman to the right) who run in 11 seconds, also on sand.

And Livio Berruti 1960

same guy and run from an other angle

And here's Jan Zelezny, still the world record holder in javelin. 182 cm/72,3 kg - 98,49 m, with the new restricted javelin!

But although javelin throwing demands a universe of brain power compared to 100 m it can't compare with football!

Women’s football, the most important (because it's so anti segregation) and exciting event in the Olympics, 

starts today. However, don’t expect BBC to give it much notice, they are busy preparing for the big PC patriarchal ceremony, i.e. 100 m for men. And the biggest stars of London 2012 will be, as usual, BBC's own narcissistic reporters obstructing the screen for those who are more interested in sports (incl. sports not necessarily containing black muslims from UK). Btw, although BBC hates to boost women’s football it loves female beach volley. However, why not talk about the absence of female muslim beach volley teams (if there are any) and the possibility for them to play in Burqas or at least in loose full body gear completed with head scarves?!

 . .

Monday, July 23, 2012

When the West first visited Timbuktu it was an islamist slave disaster. Now Rokia Traore invites us again!

Rokia Traoré, singer from Timbuktu, commenting on pious Sharia muslims (what she calls "islamists") destroying non-islamic idols (just like the Saudis have done for long): 

“Mali is 90% muslim so this is clearly extremism. If the rest of the world let these islamists take this place as their place then it's the problem of the world

Klevius comment: Please read the islamic slavery history below, and contemplate the fact that islam sanctions slavery and that only slavery and jihad combined with rapetivism and apostasy ban can explain the origin of islam, and then seriously ask yourself: Why do I call myself a muslim?!

Rokia Traoré: Being woman doesn't mean you're in general less than men or you can do less than men. This is the wrong idea many women have, We are the source of power even if what we call power is in men. The question is: Who is the stronger, the source of strength or the strength itself?

Klevius comment: This must be one of the most pathetic excuses for sex aprtheid! No matter if she simply means procreation or if she means female heterosexual attraction in some confused psychoanalytical meaning.

Rokia Traoré: We can do more than Shakespeare could do because there was not so many things known about Africa centuries ago.

Klevius comment: Beg to differ completely! Just right now the understanding of Africa's history is at its lowest point ever mainly because of two reasons: The unwillingness to see islam's enormous destruction of Africa throughout 1400 years, and the sort of racist boosting of "Africans" and "African culture" due to an underlying assumption of African inferiority, when the only clearly visible reason for Africa's general historical backwardness is to be found in islam's Sharia slave finance that sucked out most of Africa's "libido". It's Koranic slave finance that made some of your ancestors rich and most of them poor/enslaved/murdered. And it's Western technology that made your welth that made you wealthy and successful Rokia, not islam!

When Shakespeare wrote about the Jewish slave trader and criticized the immoral of making money on human flesh, then this reflects Shakespeare's deep insight in the Jewish/Mahometan slave trade cooperation from his point of view of Italy and the Ottoman Caliphate. Today this knowledge is by all means suppressed and silenced, often by the help of the worst islamist dictatorships such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and their allies. .

Klevius history lesson for Rokia Traore about her Timbuktu

Timbuktu is a horrendous creation of Arabic islamic slave raiding/trading. Like Zanzibar along the East-African coast, Timbuktu functioned as a main slavery hub from West-Africa through Sahara. It's surrounded by desert and its only main income has been the Koran sanctioned slave trade. For someone who isn't completely ignorant about the history of islam Timbuktu's grotesque mosques screams out the sufferings of Millions of African slaves while simultaneously functioning as a "moral" cover up for this islamic Sharia finance by referring to the will of "Allah".

Btw, have you noticed how cruel and deeply immoral islamic slave taking often is translated to PC language, e.g. "through capture in conflict"! It's like when a muslim gang deliberaterly attacks a non-muslim boy who just happens to come in their way and it's described as a "conflict" or "quarrel" or "fight" by BBC!

An other false African voice

Essop Pahad, South Africa's Minister in the Presidency: "Africa has repeatedly been portrayed as culturally inferior but in Timbuktu, we are proving that the opposite is true." The background to this funny statement is that there are, not surprisingly at all, piles of Arabic/islamic Sharia etc writings in the Timbuktu mosques. So what?!

Quotes by René-Auguste Caillié (1830) who visited this islamic Eldorado and was deeply disappointed with what he saw:

"...a mass of ill-looking houses, built of earth. "
Describing his impressions on entering Timbuktu.

" The poor slaves work entirely naked, exposed to the heat of the burning sun. The presence of the master intimidates them, and the fear of punishment expedites the work; but they make themselves amends in his absence. "
A description of the conditions of African slaves working on a rice plantation at Cambaya, owned by a Muslim caravan leader, during his visit to Futa Jallon in 1820.

" The women, who had very little clothing, had their children tied to their backs. They were employed in collecting dry grass, which, being burnt, forms a kind of manure, indeed, the only kind they use. "
A description of the conditions of African slaves working on a rice plantation at Cambaya, owned by a Muslim caravan leader, during his visit to Futa Jallon in 1820.

 " [A peasant] who possesses a dozen slaves may live at his ease without travelling, merely by taking the trouble to superintend them. "
Describing the aspirations of African peasants in Futa Jallon.

" A single marabout superintends the slaves of his whole family, or several of his friends; and he assembles them all, sometimes to the number of forty or fifty under the same hut... The slaves work five days for their aster, and the sixth for the superintendent. "
Describing slave management in Futa Jallon.

Ever since Mansa Musa, the king of Mali, made his pilgrimage to Mecca in 1325, with 500 slaves and 100 camels (each carrying gold) the region had become synonymous with wealth. Slave trade from sub-Saharan Africa was controlled by the Islamic Empire which stretched along Africa's northern coast. Muslim slave trade routes across Sahara had existed for centuries, and involved salt, kola, textiles, fish, grain, but most importantly slaves.

Austrian geographer Hans Weis: The slave trade was especially lucrative. Guards carrying whips drove the slaves through the hot desert. "Only the youngest and strongest survived the two-month desert trek, and they were walking skeletons by the time they reached the Fezzan region, where they were fattened up".

Interested in Klevius' Roots Guide?

To get the full history about Timbuktu you need Klevius' Roots Guide which covers the world  history of islam's crimes. However, it won't be published before you start contributing to Klevius research although some minor details can already be found on Klevius sites and blogs! It's up to you dear reader. And please tell if you know anyone better equipped for the job! Extremely intelligent  and extremely informed while completely lacking any traces of religious or political etc fanaticism. No personal interest involved, just pure scientific curiosity and a strong belief in every individuals equal right, i.e. what we use to call the basic Human Rights not shared by islamic Sharia in any form.
And a conviction that telling the truth about islam will save many more lives and suffering than lying about it.

Klevius main problem however, is his happiness with life which distracts him a lot (see e.g. Inside Klevius mind). And as a non-religious (but see Klevius definition of religion) death for him is even happier due to its total lack of even minor irritants (honestly, wouldn't it risk  becoming a nuisance in the long run with 72 virgins hanging around. Even just a few over a limited period of time can be too many, especially if you also want to treat them as humans without sex apartheid). So what is needed is more motivation!

. .

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Klevius brief (but extremely essential) tutorial about schizophrenia and the psycho-state (at the heart of the social state)

The social state (just like islam, which has become its good friend) puts its unhealthy influence on top of other influences while sucking payment for itself via compulsory taxes! Unlike firms, companies, corporations etc the social state can never be kept responsible for its actions simply because it works through legal authority based on laws it usually creates high over the heads of the taxpayers/voters understanding (see the horrifying example of "pathological symbiosis" below).

The social state is the most destructive economical unit ever created

(an impressive example is when the Swedish social state introduced a completely non sense psychological criterion for abducting children - described in Klevius thesis "Pathological Symbiosis" - don't let the dry abstract lure you but read the whole thesis plus the appendix with copies of email correspondence to some of the culprits working for the Swedish government).

We have already heard the usual "social state" (see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship to understand the word) mob chanting about the  "danger of loners" in the case of the allegedly schizophrenia suffering James Holmes, thus again contributing to the unhealthy stereotyping of completely harmless nice and healthy individuals who just don't happen to share certain criterion of being superficially "social".

However, schizophrenia is often a hindrance for whatever sociability much like a spinal injury may be a hindrance for mobility.

Many decades ago Klevius made a journal survey among all 40 locked-in schizophrenics (incl. a few mano-depressivs) on a closed unit. Every single journal revealed clear signs of physiological mental illness long before the end of their teens! More research revealed a consistent pattern. You are more or less born with schizophrenia and you cannot get it as an adult. Puberty usually amplifies it and makes it more visible although other activities may cover it up for an untrained eye. Klevius happened to grow up in a small sub-urban that harbored a huge mental hospital with out-patients in almost every second family. Three categories were easily distinguishable for a kid: 1) patients under the influence of heavy drugs 2) patients without drugs and 3) patients without drugs but in need of them. In other words, all of them were easily distinguishable from the "normal" population (which included everything from violent alcoholics to sex offenders etc) no matter they were under medication or not.

Btw, all of them who managed to talk were deeply religious!

Due to the enormous success of non-scientific social state propaganda (see Klevius Psychosocial timeline) healthy kids are "diagnosed" in need of "treatment" while those with real physiological mental illness are more or less left aside simply because it's so much easier to "treat" a healthy individual than a sick individual.

Most schizophrenics don't harm other people. However, if a schizophrenic individual shows interest in violence and weapons etc, medication and surveillance might be the alternative to having others suffering from his/hers physiological (yes, physiological) illness as well. And the reason most attackers are male is only because of sex segregation. But the reason they're jumping the streets packed with cultural influences they cannot cope with is the psycho-social state! Much like islamic jihadists!

This is just qualified guesswork as long as we don't have all the facts needed. Because of his illness James Holmes didn’t manage to complete his studies (not the other way round) and turned into a more destructive collecting of weapons etc. Paranoia is the very soul of schizophrenia sufferers who are constantly chased by hallucinations a normal person cannot feel while awake (other than under heavy use of certain drugs) so maybe he just built up a “defense” in the first place and later on, with all those guns etc under the influence of both his mentall illness and Vicodin etc. suddenly came up with his “attack” plan.

A low profile (meaning someone able to at least partly coping with and/or covering it) schizophrenic/mano-depressive who adds certain drugs (in the case of Holmes Vicodin is mentioned) may explode even easier than "healthy" drug addicts.

Freud/psychoanalysis and psycho-dynamic psychology (and a lot of psychiatry) have for some hundred years now blurred the border between actions caused by mental illness and actions caused by cultural influences.

When Klevius long ago started his scrutiny of Freud and psychoanalysis he used as an introductory reading Henri Ellenberger's (1970) still unbeaten historical mapping of psycho-dynamic psychology all the way from exorcism to  the "discovery of the unconscious". It should be recommended for everyone who wants a deeper understanding of psychoanalysis but watch up for Ellenberger's own belief in the "unconscious" (which, in fact, had nothing to do with Freud's view).  Therefore it's recommended that one updates it with Klevius EMAH.

What Klevius wrote when Anna Lindh (Swedish Minister of Foreign Affairs) was murdered

Psycho-state at the heart of the social state

BBC:s view: Doctors split over mind of a killer. The confused signals from Sweden are well reflected in the fact that BBC previously wrongly reported that the murderer was diagnosed for schizophrenia (this error was recognized and notyfied to BBC by P. Klevius). He was not.The strange usage of the word 'psychotic' may be the reason for this confusion, i.e. that many psychoanalytically influenced psychiatrists have made their utmost to eliminate the difference between the concepts healthy and ill to the extent that almost nothing can be said but rather that it gives the psycho state a tool of incredible flexibility (not only in clinical assessments). Sweden is here a forerunner but the same tendencies can be seen all over the world, especially within the public sector (compare Angels of Antichrist).

The Swedish Prime Minister shot dead on the street and the Swedish Minister of Foreign Affairs stabbed to death in a department store.  Both murdered in central Stockholm by drug addict outcasts with a political motive and both connected to the Swedish psychiatric "welfare" system. Two main psychiatric "experts" came up with completely opposite assessments in both trials. In the Anna Lindh murder case the states Social Board intervened and declared the murderer mentally ill so he could avoid a jail sentence. This was to protect the psychiatric "care" system that had delivered Rohypnol to the murderer some hours before the murder. So the system that gave the murderer Rohypnol as "care", and hence actually guilty of murder itself, now has released him from jail because it will give him more psychiatric "care", maybe on the very same psychiatric care unit (Huddinge) where he was originally assessed not ill. Furthermore the state put a heavy Secret label on this ruling to avoid any possibility for further insights in the process. In the Olof Palme murder case the Supreme Court refused to handle it although many are convinced it was the guy who was sentenced but freed in the Court of Appeal. He has even publicly confessed his crime but - he was the wrong murderer and couldn't be sentenced for the murder of a Swedish Prime Minister. He wasn't good enough! The perfect murderer could have been an Ammerican sent by CIA or a right wing Swedish Palme-hater!

20040929 And now when the man died today, the group of investigators happily reports that they gonna continue their search for seven more years until the period of prosecution has expired!

learn more about the psycho-state 


Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Evil of religions based on evil: Physical/sexual child abuse called "circumcision" (and FMG), bigotry, hypocrisy, slavery, rapetivism etc in the name of God/Allah

Klevius question to all of you wondering why evil medieval islam is given so much space today: Could it possibly have anything to do with your own outdated religious anti-Human Rights tendencies?! 

Judaic/islamic evil protected by "divinity" while spreading bigotry, racism and sexism.

You can be evil even without a "god", however, at least you cannot hide your evilness behind "him"!

Klevius history lesson: Original Judaism was based on rapetivism for the purpose of conquering neighboring tribes by the help of numbers. That's why women were forced to squeeze out as many kids as possible in an institutionalized system of rapetivism (incl. unhealthy* male circumcision for avoiding masturbation etc). However, because Judaism was born out of true religion (see The Vagina Gate and the Atom of Kinship and Klevius Definition of Religion) Judaism later (after Christianity was born with its early asexual approach) came to be defined as transferred via the mother (for the purpose of discriminating between "true" Jews and Jews believing in Jesus etc). This, of course, constituted a bottleneck which was later radically changed in islam so that whoever female raped by a muslim could produce new muslims. Because Koran & Sharia says rape doesn't exist in islam (because women have sexually to submit under the man's demand) one may describe the islamic system as pure rapetivism

 * The principal risks of circumcision are hemorrhage, infection, and surgical accident leading to mutilation, such as penile amputation.  Death may occur from loss of blood or from systemic infection.

As discussed in Argument 1, circumcision causes emotional issues for many men.

As discussed in Argument 2, circumcision always causes loss of the ridged band and results in degraded sexual function and pleasure.

The rate of complications is understated by most writers in English, but Patel (1966) studied 100 circumcisions prospectively (the most accurate type of study), followed the infants after discharge, and recorded 35 cases of bleeding, 8 cases of infection (one severe), meatal ulcers in 31, meatal stenosis in 8, and acquired phimosis in 1.

Griffiths et al. (1985) prospectively studied 140 boys aged 1 through 15 who were admitted for circumcision. The authors reported 46 cases of vomiting, 19 cases of delayed urination, and four cases of readmission to hospital to treat complications. The mean time of healing was 10.4 days.

Williams & Kapila (1993) report an incredible variety of complications, up to and including death. The incidence of death from circumcision related complications is unknown, because no on maintains a record of deaths from circumcision, however Gellis says there are more deaths from complications of circumcision than cancer of the penis, while Baker estimates 229 deaths a year from circumcision. Coroner’s reports show several circumcision deaths at the hands of medical practitioners, and, tragically, two deaths after ritual circumcision are a matter of record.

Newborn boys who have been circumcised have an open wound. They are at twelve-times greater risk of infection with life-threatening antibiotic-resistant CA-MRSA than intact boys. This is a new and emerging risk recently recognized by the CDC.

Non-therapeutic infant and child circumcision should not be performed because the injury is certain and the risks are severe and demonstrated. 

The foreskin has a multitude of natural functions which have nothing to do with racist/sexist religious "divinity".

In fact, no minor should be circumcised/mutilated in the name of a "god"!

Monday, July 16, 2012

Why are muslims and islam so afraid of Human Rights?

This woman (sitting by the islamofascist OIC Fuhrer/Caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu)  is now pelted by rotten tomatoes etc by those Egyptians who wanted a secular spring, not an islamist spring backed by US.
























Think about the worst crimes, war criminals, genocides etc and you will almost always find islam and the OIC Fuhrer/Caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu conneceted to it!


The relentless and inevitable decline of islam has begun. The time has come to fight against its misery, so easily historically distinguishable if you remove slavery, piracy, and Western oil and aid money from the equation. Time to obliterate the injustices and suffering caused by islam’s only original ideological asset, i.e. parasitism in the name of "Allah". Time for the only correct system against slavery,  sexism and racism. The real basic (negative) Human Rights which protect every human being from ideological (positive) impositions.

It took a lifetime for this man to understand the evil of ideological impositions.
I understand what Obama is and what he is doing because I was once like him: I am a former communist. As a youth growing up during the Vietnam War, I was influenced by some of the more extreme, anti-American opposition to that conflict and began to identify with the enemy. I became convinced the U.S. epitomized all that was evil in the world. During high school, I was arrested in what we called “anti-war demonstrations” that should be more accurately termed “anti-American riots.” Just like Obama, my youthful radicalism attracted the attention of powerful and influential people in the country. I was recruited for full-ride scholarships at colleges like Antioch, known for grooming the next generation of leftists. When I got into trouble for refusing to salute the flag, the American Civil Liberties Union was there, johnny-on-the-spot, to defend me and bring the school principal to his knees.

According to islamist extremists (like OIC Caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a secular tradition, which cannot be implemented by muslims without trespassing the islam and Sharia.

Therefore predominantly Muslim countries, such as Sudan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, frequently criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its perceived failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non-Western countries.

Some other voices than Klevius on the evilness of islam*

 * Do note what every islamist knows, i.e. that there is no islam without Human Rights violating Sharia, i.e. islamofascism! There is no loophole for islam to be islam without its evil origin!

 The Cairo declaration on "human rights" in islam (CDHRI) has been criticized for being implemented by a set of states with widely disparate islamic policies and practices who had a shared interest in disarming international criticism of their domestic human rights record.

Article 24 of the declaration states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 also says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia."[7]

The CDHRI has been criticised for failing to guarantee individual freedom as a fundamental and nonderogable right.

In a joint written statement submitted by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status, the Association for World Education (AWE) and the Association of World Citizens (AWC): a number of concerns were raised, that the CDHRI limits Human Rights, Religious Freedom and Freedom of Expression. It concludes: "The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is clearly an attempt to limit the rights enshrined in the UDHR and the International Covenants. It can in no sense be seen as complementary to the Universal Declaration."

The Centre for Inquiry in September 2008 in an article to the United Nations writes that the CDHRI: "undermines equality of persons and freedom of expression and religion by imposing restrictions on nearly every human right based on Islamic Sharia law."

Rhona Smith writes that because the CDHRI's reference to Shariah implies an inherent degree of superiority of men.

Adama Dieng, a member of the International Commission of Jurists, argued that the declaration gravely threatens the inter-cultural consensus on which the international human rights instruments are based; that it introduces intolerable discrimination against non-Muslims and women. He further argued that the CDHRI reveals a deliberately restrictive character in regard to certain fundamental rights and freedoms, to the point that certain essential provisions are below the legal standards in effect in a number of Muslim countries; it uses the cover of the "Islamic Shari'a (Law)" to justify the legitimacy of practices, such corporal punishment, which attack the integrity and dignity of the human being.

Turkish OIC Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu himself openly strives for a reborn Ottoman Caliphate (you know, the islamofascist construction that fell apart when slavery was aboilished by the West)!

 Bob Unruh:  A senior fellow for a Madrid-based think tank is alerting freedom-loving people about a caliphate-planning conference being held by Muslims soon, a move he said was given a boost of support by the Obama administration recently when it allowed a three-day “Istanbul Process” conference in Washington.

That event, writes Soeren Kern, Senior Fellow for European Politics at Madrid’s Grupo de Estudio, “gave the [Organization of Islamic Cooperation] the political legitimacy it has been seeking to globalize its initiative to ban criticism of Islam.”

The coming event, Caliphate Conference 2012, is being organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir, which Kern describes as a “pan-Islamic extremist group that seeks to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Shariah law.”

The 57-member OIC has been proposing a special international law that would make it criminal to speak ill of Muhammad or his followers. It proposed Resolution 16/18, a plan for countries to “combat” things like “intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of … religion and belief.” 

The idea was adopted in the U.N. General Assembly and Kern’s analysis notes that it would be largely ineffectual as long as the West doesn’t jump behind it.
That is why it was a “diplomatic coup,” according to Kern, when Obama held the three-day conference in Washington, where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed to the key principal Muslims have been seeking for years: holding people responsible when “free speech” … “results in sectarian clashes.”

The critical question that has been among the reasons the so-called “anti-defamation” plans previously have failed is that such limits suggest, even require, that the blame be placed on the person making a statement if the situation is that someone else reacts to it violently.
Free speech advocates are worried over her comment that, “It’s one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That’s free speech. But if it results in sectarian clashes, if it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of religious sites, if it even results in imprisonment or death, then government must held those – hold those who are responsible accountable.”

In Western civilization, the standard for responsibility would be to hold those accountable who do violence, not those who make statements that those who do violence blame for their actions.
The U.N. strategy, proposed by Pakistan “on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference,” again creates an open door to blame someone for making a statement about Islam to which Muslims would react violently, by raising concerns about “incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”
Further, it “condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”

Repeated concerns have been raised by such statements, as they open the door for attacks on people making statements about their own beliefs, which someone else would choose to decry as “hatred.”
In fact, the resolution calls for “measures to criminalize” some related behaviors.
Sharona Schwartz at at the Blaze noted that the German-language promotion video for the conference starts: “The relentless decline of capitalism has begun. The time has come to fight against poverty. Time to obliterate the injustices. Time for the correct system.”

Which is identified as Islam.

In a report published by the Stonegate Institute, Kern said the “explicit aim” of the Istanbul Process is to make it a crime to criticize Islam.
He writes, “According to Steven Emerson, a leading authority on Islamic extremist networks, Hizb ut-Tahrir is emulating the three-stage process by which Muslims established the first Islamic caliphate after the death of the Islamic Prophet, Mohammed, in the year 632.
“During the first stage, Hizb ut-Tahrir builds a party by cultivating a small number of supporters to engage in recruitment and propaganda. In the second stage (which Hizb ut-Tahrir is now entering in Europe and the United States), the group educates Muslims in order to recruit a larger group of people to join Hizb ut-Tahrir and support its revolution. Finally, having won the support of Muslims, Hizb ut-Tahrir moves to establish a Shariah-ruled Islamic government.”
“Resolution 16/18, which was adopted at HRC headquarters in Geneva in March 2011, is widely viewed as a significant step forward in OIC efforts to advance the international legal concept of defaming Islam”.

The Islamic-led Defamation of Religions proposal in the United Nations was “nothing more than an effort to achieve special protections for Islam – a move to stifle religious speech,” according to an analysis by Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice.
According to the Human Rights First organization, the plan simply violates fundamental freedom of expression norms.
Tad Stahnke, of Human Rights First said the concept is “unfortunate for both individuals at risk whose rights will surely be violated under the guise of prohibiting ‘defamation of religions,’ as well as for the standards of international norms on freedom of expression.”
The issue also has been addressed by Carl Moeller, chief of Open Doors USA:“This is a battle for our basic freedoms,”. “This [U.N. idea] is Orwellian in its deviousness,” he said. “To use language like the anti-defamation of a religion. It sounds like doublespeak worthy of Orwell’s 1984 because of what it really does.”
He said Muslim nations would use it as an endorsement of their attacks on Christians. Worse would be the “chilling” effect on language that the U.N. plan would create worldwide, he said.
“This would be a huge blessing to those who would silence dissidents in their countries, Islamic regimes,” he said. “This stands as a monument to the gullibility of the masses in the United States and other places who don’t see this for what it is.”

 How islmofascism is misrepresented for the sole purpose of keeping YOU ignorant about islam

Islamofascist OIC Fuhrer/Caliph Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu lies you straight up in your face when he says: “The way Sharia law was presented in the last few decades, last three decades of the 20th century, was horrible. Has nothing to do with Islam, or with the word Sharia itself. Sharia means “way,” a way. It means canonical law, in a way. It does not mean chopping hands or heads of people, or stoning them. These measures were abrogated centuries back, and it has never been, except one or two cases in the whole history of Islam, that they were implemented”.
Klevius correction of this utter lie by the OIC Fuhrer: A very low and cheap trick, indeed. Ihsanoglu tries to exploit ignorance about the fundamental evilness of islam by referring to customs he know can be spoken away in such a manner that they leave islam itself untouched. But what he should have said if he had any decency is that islam disapproves of giving the same rights to women and non-muslims as do the true Human Rights!

Islamofascist OIC Fuhrer/Caliph Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu: “Now, to bring this back to the fore and say that this is Sharia, or this is Islam, or this is Islamic law, was an attempt of a few dictators who came to power through military coup d’états. They wanted to enforce their dictatorial regimes by giving themselves an Islamic religious authority, and saying “this is the law of God. I am implementing the law of God. If you come against this, I will chop your head or cut your hand or I will stone those who have these kinds of relations.” I think that was a kind of fear mongering by dictators to use the law of God in their hands in a very wrong way. Islam has nothing to do with this, and we should really re-address the issue again, and we should not allow anybody to talk in the name of Islam in such an ugly way. I’m glad that there are no more dictators who claim they are applying Sharia law in the Muslim world”.

Klevius cortrection: Well, there are! You and the Saudi, Qatar etc islamofascist dictators, Muslim Brotherhood, Hizb-ut-Tahrir etc etc!

Organizations like Hizb ut-Tahrir have waited patiently for the days they are witnessing now. A political organization founded 60 years ago; they call for an Islamic State, and an Islamic leader, a Khalifa. They believe the Islamic Awakening is a call from the masses for exactly that.
A fat hijab momma tells it like it is:

‘This is no ‘twitter revolution’, this is not an uprising of secular youth, this is an uprising for Islam”-

In the West the role of Islam in these movements is downplayed or even dismissed. It’s called ‘an Arab Spring’or the twitter revolution, created by secular youth who want a secular state.

Barry Sommer on OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration 

 To the surprise of many, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has shown a new commitment to advancing human rights by establishing an Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission within the organization. In the Commission’s first meeting in Jakarta, Secretary General Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu asked the 18-member Commission in his opening address to “review and update OIC instruments, including the Cairo Declaration [of Human Rights in Islam]…” If the Commission intends to indeed advance human rights, then the Cairo Declaration is the first among these instruments in need of serious revision.
In 1990, the OIC approved a document that is now referred to as the Cairo Declaration in an attempt reconcile the concept of human rights and Islam. The Declaration protects many of the universal human rights: it forbids discrimination; supports the preservation of human life, supports the protection of one’s honor, family, and property; and affirms the human right to education, medical and social care, and a clean environment.

From an international human rights perspective, the controversial nature of the Cairo Declaration lies in its claim of adherence to Shari’ah. Its preamble affirms that“fundamental rights and universal freedoms are an integral part of [Islam]” and these rights and freedoms are “binding divine commandments” revealed to the Prophet Muhammad in the Quran. The central role of Shari’ah can be clearly seen in the Declaration’s articles. Article 22 states that “Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to principles of Shari’ah.” Article 12, affirms that “every man shall have the right, within the framework of Shari’ah, to free movement” (nothing is said  about every woman). Articles 24 and 25 further makes Shari’ah supreme by asserting that Shari’ah is the Declaration’s “only source of reference.”

Such shorthand and cursory use of Shari’ah gives rise to four important shortcomings. The first is that it renders the document too restrictive. Shari’ah represents an extensive moral and legal code, and limiting rights such as free speech to a Shari’ah compatible framework of values would essentially render free-speech meaningless. Furthermore, the document is rendered ambiguous., as it does not specify what constitutes Shari’ah. Given the diversity of opinions on the subject across time and between and within madhabs (schools of Islamic law), it is impossible to know what rights are protected.

Interestingly, the declaration empowers states, not individuals. In the modern world, Shari’ah has increasingly become integrated in states’ domestic legal systems. In the absence of any international authority to decide on Shari’ah, the Cairo Declaration effectively diminishes the universality of human rights by  relegating them to the discretion of governments.

Finally, the declaration conflicts with international human rights. The document provides only a subordinated status to religious minorities and also prohibits conversion from Islam. It also presents glaring evidence of discrimination against women, as it provides the right to freedom of movement or marriage only to men.
These shortcomings render the Declaration useless at best and at worst harmful for human rights. Not surprisingly, the only people who take the document seriously are critics of Islam who invoke it to argue the religion’s incompatibility with human rights. Muslim advocacy groups, scholars on Islam and human rights, and even the OIC Secretary General İhsanoğlu have either ignored the declaration or have avoided defending it publicly. 

Read on a site not completely ignorant about islam

 None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening. We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but  you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way...

. .

Sunday, July 08, 2012

Klevius question: How come that people today are more ignorant of important issues than ever before?!

OIC's Sharia connection (Cairo declaration) and its disastrous effect on muslims (i.e. robbing them, especially women, of the true Human Rights) is by far the most burning issue of our time, yet no one seems to care!?

Contemplate for a while the tragic fact that Klevius tops a Google search on 'oic sharia'

 . .

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

From stupid bragger to bad looser

Why are black or muslim footballers excused?!

Mario Balotelli, is 000000a footballer who is much better at filming than playing. And who, just because of his skin color, gets away with more than he deserves and is valued more than he deserves. A "white" player with similar background and skills would never have got away with it.

While the pompous black guy failed in everything (except his numerous filming encouraged with referee's positive bias) the Spanish team easily crushed Italy 4-0. Any other good Italian forward placed instead of Mario Balotelli could have made the game much more even, although Spain would have deserved to win anyway. It seems that Italy, under the pressure of the "racism card", combined the introduction of a "black" player with the fact that referees are more lenient against them and hence, by placing him at the top, opened up for cheap free kicks and possible penalty kicks. Moreover, such a player can also play more brutally against "white" ball possessors without the referee reacting. Why didn't Mario Balotelli get any cards or even warnings for his extraordinary filming?!

Balotelli, who was always placed on the top waiting for a ball, scored one nice goal (out of some 20 failed shots in the last matches!) in Eurocup 2012 (the second against Germany - the first header, following a brilliant assist placed two meters in front of the goalkeeper and almost directly on Mario's head, being so easy that even a low level amateur footballer should have been ashamed of not hitting it.

Klevius comment: The only credits I can give to Mario Balotelli is that by becoming a professional footballer, with all the hard training and focusing it demands, he has at least proved he can do something. And who knows, maybe some day he can become a decently good professional player as well. From the point of football he's enormously overvalued, but from a tactical ("racist card") he might be able to contribute to some league points while making football more boring to watch.

My point? Racially biased referees (and others) may have contributed to the limiting of Mario's full potential.

Is it the same reason why Ms Lucy Black (an extremely racist internet troll) is excused?

(the pic of the murdered girls is inserted by Klevius in 'Ms Lucy Black's' racist hate speech ranting}

 Why is islam excused?

Islam, a "religion" born out of pure evil, is excused for all its evil deeds, past and present, just because its evilness produced a lot of poor dependents and the oil that "Western" science and technology found, dug and paid for, produced Saudi etc wealth that is used to brainwash ignorant people about islam.

This evil* man, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, wants to be the new Ottoman Sharia Caliph of all the world's muslims while most of these muslims are quite ignorant about the connection to them being simultaneously ripped of their most basic Human Rights.

My point? Islam bias may have contributed to the limiting of many a muslim's full and free potential. And the total disaster for many an ignorant girl! Ignorance deliberately tutored by media, schools and politicians!

* by 'evil' Klevius means the undeniable fact that Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu via OIC wants to deny all the world's muslims their Human Rights. How come? Well, because OIC's founding document is Sharia, not the Human Rights declaration! Moreover, he wants to criminalize all scrutiny of crimes against humanity caused by islamic ideology. And although the consequences of this reaches rock bottom of what decent people have assumed being self evident moral foundation, i.e. freedom from impositions and freedom of thought and expression etc, the ignorance about Sharia and islam is alarmingly widespread, not only among poor and uneducated male dominated Egyptian, Pakistani etc rural women but also, due to Saudi steered media, education etc (often under the funny title "religious tolerance").

 . .