A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Friday, December 31, 2004
Klevius' comment: This is perfectly in line with the previous post below and the fact that Swedes are the most egocentric/individualistic of all people (see World Values Survey) i.e. lonely individuals with superficial ties to each other, and that the Swedish state is proportionally the most elaborated "welfare"/social state in the world, and that its bureaucracy long since has abondoned its citizens and now mainly focuses on its own well-being spiced with flimsy paychology, state feminism and suspicious state ideologies from the past, such as Maoism, Marxism-Leninism, Islamism etc. (see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship).
The clumpsyness of the Swedish government only reflects the cruel truth, namely that the state with the highest taxes is the state with the lowest quality of its welfare performance (because the Swedish state is created for the state, not for the citizens outside that bureaucratic social state sphere).
The Swedish state (and its media) hypocrisy now peaks when the most notorious child abducting and family destroying social machinary in the world (see the revealing paper above), tries to express its "sorrow" for those families and others involved in the tsunami catastrophe! Sweden is no good example if you want to create a welfare state. Sweden is precisely the opposite (see Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs. social state)!
Thursday, December 30, 2004
Out of Africa as Pygmies and back as global "Mongoloids".
How many times have these kinds of tsunamis happened before and how have they affected M130 migration?
Furthermore the combination professional/human being simply don't make sense, because you can hardly be human and paid at the same moment. Therefore the best of "being human" is performed in between other (professional) tasks, and hence makes "professional care", other than practical/physical, impossible. Although a prostitute's customer may long for a "human being" on top of physical sex, he can never get it from a prostitute, only from the professional when "in between" her professional tasks.
Tuesday, December 28, 2004
Klevius' AIQ net
Monday, December 27, 2004
Klevius' comment: Although the study clearly shows that the segregational problem now mainly lies on the female side, the interpretation offered in the article equally clearly shows a confused effort to make sense of it within a feminist epistemology (instead of analyzing it as a logical waste product of vanishing sex segregation - compare the "Ossis" from DDR after the wall had fallen).
What is sexsegregation?
From Klevius without love
Saturday, December 25, 2004
As to the youth terrorists (most terrorists are teenagers) the main problem is their lack of attachment in a modern world that has given the responsibility for parentship over to the state (i.e. to an empty, cold, loveless bureaucracy that only bothers about squezing as much money as possible in their own pockets).
see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship
Friday, December 24, 2004
"...the MSA is the leading evangelist of Wahhabism, Osama bin Laden’s radical brand of fundamentalist Islam. Among the MSA’s numerous pro-terrorist actions:
MSA members at UCLA raised money for Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists at their annual “Anti-Zionist Week.”
Speaker Muammad Faheed told an MSA meeting at Queensborough Community College in New York, “The only relationship you should have with America is to topple it!”
Nihad Awad addressed the 2003 Iowa Muslim Student Association Annual Conferences. Awad had told a college audience in 1994, “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.”
The University of Southern California MSA invited Taliban ambassador Sayyid Hashimi to speak on campus six months before 9/11.
MSA at California State University Northridge held a fundraiser for Islamic Relief, an organization that received a $50,000 contribution from a front group run by Osama bin Laden.
Dr. Abdulrahman Hijazi on James Madison University’s MSA 2002 “Jihad” panel, giving a speech on “The Islamic Peace Process and the Goals of Jihad.” He once extolled a terrorist “martyr” whose “hope of having the mercy of Allah…by one of the greatest good deeds, which is jihad, was more attractive to him than by being happy with his wife at home.”
University of Idaho MSA President Sami Omar Al-Hussayen, was ordered deported for working for a radical Muslim charity with ties to terror. While on campus, he had sought access to a chemical lab containing nuclear material.
Last October, the University of Pennsylvania MSA sponsored “Rev.” Bill Baker, the onetime chairman of the neo-Nazi Populist Party, a fact the local MSA president dubbed “irrelevant.”"
Monday, December 20, 2004
For an in depth understanding of the social state see Angels of Antichrist
Sunday, December 19, 2004
Klevius' comment: I.e. brainwashing, terror breeding Koran schools will get more protection and support in the EU than in Turkey! An irony, isn't it? Turkey's Imams now welcome the negative human rights of the Western, less worthy "infidels". In an extension it means that sexist/fascist/terror Islam in Turkey as well as from its wide open backdoor to the rest of Mideast, is welcomed and even protected by the very rights Islam aims to destroy!
An alternative for the Imams would be to learn more about negative human rights rather than abusing these rights for the spreading of Koran school Islam.
Monday, December 06, 2004
"that the democracy and the freedom that America is keen to promote in our world are not a 21st century Trojan horse."
"God has endowed women with a capacity for patience so they may realize their dreams and the dreams of their children"
Klevius' comment: Is it the horrifying possibility of children's freedom from being forced into brainwashing Koran schools etc that is the "Trojan horse" in Mid-East? And do Muslim sex segregators want Dr. Rice become a Muslim (or at least a supporter of fundamentalist Islam. I mean, she, like the women in Darfur etc., isn't racially a "real Arab")? It certainly looks so when you read the Arab/Islamic article above (I assume that the Muslim writer hardly incorporates all non-Muslim Arabs in his world view. But I do!).
The flattering approach to Dr. Rice in the article clearly reflects an Islamist's crude sex segregation as well as an unveiled attempt to use this sex segregation for the purpose of selling the picture of non-Muslim atrocities without even mentioning Islamic terrorists or the unknown but huge number of individuals outside Mid-East who have been targeted (religious rapes, tortures,killings etc) by Muslim offenders bred in fanatic Koran schools (in the name of their religion and their victims' lack of the "right" religion).
Islam is sex segregation, but What is sex segregation?
What is the true definition of religion?
What is the Vagina gate?
Understanding Muslim fascism?
Klevius' AIQ net & World Values Survey
A series of cases have highlighted the issue, including that of Heshu Yones, 16, from Acton. She was murdered by her father Abdalla - a Kurdish Muslim jailed for life over the killing - after she formed a relationship with a Lebanese Christian.
Sikh elder Palwinder Singh Dhillon, 65, was jailed for life for killing pregnant Anita Gindha Ralh, 22, in Manor Park. Her husband, with whom she had eloped, accused her family of ordering her death.
Police say some murders were carried out by contract killers.
police in London were being approached by an average of four women or girls a week who feared for their safety after " dishonouring" their family
What makes Islam so dangerous is precisely its characteristics of being a "social order". Yes, honour killings do occur within other "religions" as well (and are of course equally disgusting) but on top of this Islam, because of its militaristic and expansionistic root, is construed in a way that makes withdrawal difficult not to say impossible. Islam's main idea is totalitarian submission and when, for example, Tarik Ramadan might support some sort of secular state arrangements, he doesn't allow but Koran as the moral principle (e.g. he supports a continuing and limiting sex segregation and doesn't admit equality for women in ritual performance nor in many practical matters, which are not in line with his interpretation of Koran).
There are many lonely individuals out there in the modern world (see Homo Filius Nullius) and because they lack a common title few notice them. Subscribing to the submission of Islam doesn't necessarily help the individual as much as it helps the spreading of Islam!
No matter what the "moderates" say (those who say they are just nice and fine and only want some peace from the evil non-Muslims, and we don't take any responsibility for the Islamic terrorists either) Islam is militant sex segregation but What is sex segregation?
Saturday, December 04, 2004
Now her sister says she fears raising her small children here because of the heated anti-immigrant climate. Her two brothers have left the country.
"When I came to Holland, for me it was, Whew! What freedom! What a country! It was love, immediately," she recalls.
"But Holland is not the same."
Award for death threat senator
Islam is sex segregation but what is sex segregation?