Saudi Aramco's confidence scam
BBC, in an interview about Corbyn, also desperately tries to agitate for more militarism and use of nukes - although fact being that a UK with nukes and war meddling globally may draw more attention and due risk for the Brits than without.
However, unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and dying of US.
BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already "colonized" football and the English language is a global property.
John le Carré: I'm depressed and ashamed of British nationalism. Nationalism needs enemies but today we really have no identifiable enemies except among ourselves.
North Atlantic (sic) Treaty Organization invades a country in Mideast and attacks (with chemival weapons) a people without a country.
UK's Brexit business model: Sharia finance, weapons sale and militaristic meddling?UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (sic) and Global Neo-Imperialist and Militarist Meddling, Jeremy Hunt, 15 Oct. 2019: It's wrong to accuse Donald Trump - it's Americans isolationism because American taxpayers don't want to pay between 1/2 and 2/3 of the defense of Europe. And Turkey is very skilled at finding wedges and gaps between allies. UK should be EU's bridge to US.
Peter Klevius: No, EU should take care of its own defense - against whom? The Saudi dictator family who is the world's no 1 spender on weapons and islamic terror incitement and who hates EU's anti-sharia legislation? And UK taxpayers should not have to pay more for dangerous militarism. Militaristic meddling is a bad and dangerous business idea.
Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!
BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?
People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Sweden's Pol Pot* radio eagerly supports political Islam & hypocritical Muslim Sharia banking while blinking Islamic rapes/violence/fatwa terror etc!
What is "Islamic fanatism"? The answer is simple, it's the text in Koran! But at least it's easy to understand, and honest and straightforward in its extraordinary violent and hateful racist/sexist message against the "infidels"/"non-believers"! Far mor so than other totalitarian and anti-human rights movements that have raped, murdered and tyrannized under the hypocritical banner "for the weak and the poor"!
Isn't it tragi-comical that journalists who use to call parties they just don't like, "undemocratic", "populist" and "racist", "sexist" etc, now fanatically support a political party (political Islam) and party program (the Koran, Sharia etc) that in every aspect is worse, not to mention its clearly pronounced totalitarian goal!
In retrospect I'm convinced the staff on the Swedish state radio will appear very similar to their nazi- and Pol Pot- supporting predecessors! And why shouldn't they? Sweden is ruled by the same party (hint: a relative to Hitler's national socialist worker's party!) now as it was back then! And the excuse has always been (as it was abt horrifying Swedish eugenics up to the 1970's): "But it was the "spirit of the time, you know"!
Also see Klevius definition of religion (one of the most visited albeit its recent appearance)!
The main news in Sweden's "Islamic" official state radio (P1:public radio paid by fees and taxes compulsory for everyone!) today: A few representatives of a political party (Sverigedemokraterna, usually described as "racist and hostile to foreigners" because of their criticism of Sweden's heavily failured immigrant policy) tried to spread leaflets at a Swedish school (which had previously been invaded and attacked by violent immigrant youngsters). (For those who haven't visited Peter Klevius' sites it might be good to know that he isn't politically even close to Sverigedemokraterna).
News no. 2 Aid workers are attacked in Sudan. But one shouldn't blame anyone because both militias as well as government forces are involved (sic). Klevius comment: I.e. a senseless cheating of the listeners, and a deliberate cover up of the racist Islamic/Arabic systematic genocide/rapes/humiliations etc exploitation of the weak and poor for the greedy purpose of securing oil assets under the ground! As you know Islam's blood is oil-money!
News No. 3 Economic crimes (i.e. primarily threats to the securing of tax money to the heavily politisized Swedish social state bureaucracy) are very worrysome (say news reporters in a country which cannot and doesn't even try to use its polices for the protection of its citizens from sky-rocketing youth violence/rapes etc. To such an extent that vice prime minister accidently admitted into an un-shut microphone that "the Swedish police is lazy and doesn't even try to solve crimes").
Nowhere a single mentioning abt deliberately and systematically planned genocidial Arabic/Islamic atrocities against black native Africans. Neither abt Islamic atrociities, rapes, violence etc on the Swedish streets etc.
After some ten minutes out of 15 the news ended and was follwed by an even lengthier program abt these "symphasizers" which, in fact, turned out to be ordinary (not belonging to the intelligentia" as it was reported) less successful youth who used to drink and do nothing (probably victims of the senselessly cruel and destructive Swedish "welfare" system LVU - see Attachment and LVU).
It's turning really laughable when words like "they (these lost and usually drunk youngsters) are recruiting" etc are used and the big issue is "What should we do with this problem?", while Islamic atrocities in Sweden are systematically and completely neglected in the news, no matter how young girls are raped and/or beaten by how many.
"The project "Islamic Sharia in Canada) was initiated by the World Islamic League - a Saudi-based organization dedicated to the spread of wahhabism. Never since Nazism has there been as powerful an ideology as political Islam aiming the annihilation of Jews" and democratic legal systems based on negative human rights.
Islam, not the "Muslims" (see below), is the problem! Furthermore it should be noted that Swedish state media and officials frenetically try to blur the line between Islam/Muslims and all the other immigrants who, as a consequence, become more or less visible, and who also lack the financial oil-money support from un-democratic Arabic dictators and oil-billionaires! Not to mention all the Swedish poors (especially single mothers and some fathers) who live far below what is considered poverty level in the US! That's really racist to me! Especially when it comes from upper middle-class people who usually like to pretend caring for the weak ones in society!
Read my lips: Every effort has been made in Sweden to boost a "suitable" Islamist for the Nobel prize. E.g. Adonis, the author that has missed the core of the veil trap entirely.!
Klevius human rights nets and blogs growing faster than Arabic oil-fueled Islam and terror supportinbg al-Jazeera (one of Islam's main propaganda tools together with e.g. Swedish state media)!
Saturday, September 17, 2005
There aren't "1,1 billion Muslims". In fact, there are none*! Only a looming & anti-democratic/anti-human rights pan-Arabic**/Islamic sexist loophole!
And whereas communism's milder relative, social demcracy, may be described as a democracy-sponging fascism/national socialism without weapons, Islam is ALL OF THEM! It sponges on democracy, it abuses human rights, and it keeps its weapons and sexist/totalitarian objectives!
Lenin's What Is To Be Done?, when it was first published in 1902, was accepted by leading Russian social democrats
It's also no coincidence that Hitler's NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party) supplanted the Social Democrats asas the largest party in the Reichstag in the democratic election of 1932!
A system of moral based on negative human rights or fascism? Political Islam, a much meaner relative to parasitic (i e transition of tax money to itself and its own bureacracy rather to the people) social democracy (see Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs. social state) is today the main threat against democracy. Sadly, democrats seem to bother the least!
Not all of Christianity is fundamentalist, but all of Islam is!
According to a study on the texts of ten main religions the Koran (the book of the "peaceful" Islam) is by far the most warlike and violent, whereas Buddhist (remember the huge, unique Buddha statues the Islamists destroyed in Afganistan before Bush liberated the country!) texts are by far the most peaceful. The New Testament came second. The Old Testament, although not even close to the Koran, contains some violence, but remember it's also more than 1000 years older! Furthermore, the Koran doesn't even try to problematize its abundance of and encouragement to violence!
But what is perhaps most astonishing with Islam is that many (and some of them people who otherwise don't use to have problem with reason) seem to defend its extreme sex segregation/sexism by referring to conditions that "used to be even worse"!
The evasions abt Islam are seemingly endless and widely accepted no matter how cracked they are. A fanatic and dangerous wish to blink obvious facts! A wish for a pesonal loophole, that's stronger than the fear of violent and totalitarian fascist ideologies?
From Stalin and the killing fields of Pol Pot to Islamic dictatorship and Arabic racism and the systematic killing and raping in Sudan/Darfur (silenced and belittled by the Bush-condemners who simultaneously support Islam)! Do we ever learn?
Note! To be non-religious or atheist has nothing to do with communism etc. Or the other way round: A true commitment to the Holy negative human rights is a road to a non-totalitarian/non-fascist/non-racist/non-sexist ideological approach between global humans. It's a myth that we need rigid religious systems for upholding moral, law and order. Look around and you will in fact be proven the contrary (see World Values Survey & A formula for a world "religion" based on negative human rights and true attachment)!
It's, in, fact, precisely the black "moral loopholes" in Islam that makes it equally attractive as the German national-socialist working party (a branch of German social democracy) fascism in the 1930's. Whereas negative human rights "only" offer a universal logic for coping with everyone, Islam offers (apart from its main task as pan_Arabism) a variety of possibilities for hatred, contempt and separatism, confined in a repressive and rigid set of rules etc, which, furthermore, are not only open, but encouraged to violence on different levels.
Real attachment or evil gang/group superficiality (sometimes confusingly like ethnicity)?
What is needed on top of the idea of negative human rights is true attachment between kins and friends instead of the superficial gang/member/group-"attachment" offered by suspicious religious and other systems of belief.
Weird children/youngsters who have been raised/fostered by their alikes constitute a fast growing criminal problem for the world. But why are they detached from the rest of us? Because they want to? I don't think so. I think they need both, all the time. And if someone has to go sometimes, it should rather be the weirdies, shouldn't it? But today the reality is almost always the opposite (read more abt attachment, delinquency and sex segregation on Childless child psychoanalysts in search for motherhood/femininity!
Looking for extremism in Islam? Stop looking. Just read the extreme hatred, contempt and sexism in the Koran, and consider that it's supposed to be the true heart of this "religion" And consider that Islam's ultimate and totalitarian/sexist/racist goals, Sharia and world hegemony, are wowen into a pattern that makes it much more like fascist "world-communism" than you might expect (And please, don't seek comfort in twisted Andalucian myths abt "the good Islam" - it's no different than the myths abt "the good communist paradise"!)! In fact, it's only its hereto failure for hegemony that disguises its real danger! Isn´t that enough extremism for a warning lamp to lit? But some might argue that one should try to "interprete" away those evil parts of the Koran. Well, I for one, think it's easier to "interprete" away Islam as a whole as long as it contains the Koran, and as long as this Koran is tied to this "religion" in a way that makes bin Laden's reading of it equally possible as someone else, just as we used to do with the extreme Utopia of a communist society. No one knows what is "true Islam", no more than what was "true communism" (Pol Pot?). But what we do know is that Islam is full of possibilities and scary openings (incl the eager supply of Arab oil-money) for weirdies on all levels! Do we really need to give this faceless and irresponsible ideology, full of evil potential, even the slightest chance? Most other ways of fighting poverty and inequality are probably preferable. Let's start with fair tax/citizen salary/health/education/housing insurance for everyone everywhere. A huge opportunity for UN - if we could only get rid of those anti-democratic Islamic states promoting genocide, rapes etc while hindering real democratic development within the UN!
One of the world's foremost "moderate Muslims" now seems to be king Abdullah of Jordan. Why? Because most Islamists have already realized that lunatic terrorism has become a stupid dead end, and because "moderate Islam" is (like Islam in all forms) essentially a slogan for gaininng power. Furthermore it's Islam's total lack of religious authority and responsibility that gives it its real, contourless power, but also its racist/sexist/fascist appearances! This means that while many talk in the name of Islam or name their particular ethnicity Muslim, the only thing they really have in common is that they boost Pan-Arabic Islam (which, in turn, is equally diversified and split)! And much of the sexist/racist(infidels, unbelievers etc)/totalitarian texts in Koran can never be reconciled with negative human rights, de-sex segregation and real democracy, no matter how far the interpretations are stretched.
Persian Mirror: Human rights before Islam and Cultural Genocide in the name of Islam
Guardian: "Defying the view that one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, Rice said, ``No cause, no movement, and no grievance can justify the intentional killing of innocent civilians and noncombatants.'' She added, ``This is unacceptable by any moral standard.'' "
Klevius comment: Except one - the Koran, the main tool for pan-Arabism since the 7th century (back then with swords and robberies - now with oil money, mosques, youth organizations, and Koran schools disguised as schools)! Totalitarian and anti-democratic texts that would be immediately forbidden if published by any other political actors! Also read abt the Islamists on Chatham House and Islam's real Achilles' heal - sex segregation, on Sex segregatioon Feminism and Religion
*For those in need of elucidation: According to Roger Scruton no one is really in charge for what a Muslim should do or be. Also see Religion of peace?
**Non-Arabic Islamic states may be historically compared to non-Roman Christian states.
Islam - the compilation (with the help of the Medina Jews*** that were later killed for not obeying the leaders of that very "Islam") - of totalitarian, sexist and racist ideas spiced with violent advices for how to kill, rape and humiliate "non-believers"/"infidels" - etymologically means, quite logically, "to surrender and obey". However, Islam as a name of an ideology based on a compilation of medieval ideas, is very recent.
*** Who told Mohammed (an orphan himself) abt Abraham's "illegitimate" son Ishmael ("an outcast," "whose hand is against every man, and every man's hand against him" in Gen. xvi.12). The Islamists then used Ishmael as a convenient way to link their new "religion" to the old Judeo/Christian tradition. For more on the topic see Homo Filius Nullius, Angels of Antichrist, Was Jesus religious? Demand for resources and other writings by Peter Klevius!
Today we may thank Bush, Condi, Blair, the Marines and all the others who have contributed to Afganistan's first, free, true election. But we may also consider the fact that the puzzling fact that oil-wealthy Arab nations gave much more aid to the Katrina victims in the US than to their own "Muslim" brothers and sisters in Íraq after the horrible bridge disaster recently. The number of victims was about the same! Could the promotion of pan-Arabic Islamism possibly be involved?
So who are the Muslims?!
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Definition of human rights - especially the important "negative human rights" which are denied by Islam
Sunday, September 11, 2005
Fashion & fascism - lost souls serving Pan-Arabic Islamism? Klevius' formula against veiled totalitarian racism/sexism.
Totalitarianism is the ultimate and pronounced goal of Islam, and submission, i.e. “peace” on Islam’s terms (depending on whoever happens to be the interprete(s), its arbitrary ruling. The only "pluralism" in Islam is its choice of means and victims! But that's just for a start of an evil heritage that is too positively and naively looked upon by many. Even worse is its function as an attractive outlet for separatist racism/sexism in a multitude of reactionary and/or malign forms.
The word 'fascism' is here defined as: A political/militaristic, totalitarian ideology to which one can be converted (albeit not de-converted), and, which can make use of democracy and negative human rights, albeit it itself is ultimately undemocratic and against those very rights it sponges on (see Klevius Human rights definition - most popular on MSN).
Without its handy disguise as a "religion" Islam would long since have been forbidden in most democratic countries, as a totalitarian, racist and anti-democratic movement, on pair with national socialism etc.
When reading this one also has to keep in mind that the essence of Pan-Arabic Islam today is based on a fascist/racist/sexist compilation of texts/contexts, which has to be read in Arabic (to be "really understood") for the plain purpose of spreading the Arabic language as part of Arabic oil-imperialism. This main purpose, of course, may then evolve into all kinds of sub-purposes on more local levels, due to Islam's lack of trackability (see for example Roger Scruton's "Who takes responsibility for Islam?" - by the way an article that Aftonbladet had to defend the publishing of by another article!). His answer: "No one" reveals the deceitful combination of Islamic totalitarian arbitrariness (which, in fact, also constitutes Islam's main and wide bases for recruitment), and also is the key to how "moderate" Islamists may sponge on the deeds and threats of Islamic terrorists etc radicals). One has also to remember that ethnicity has nothing to do with Islam, albeit Islam is often linguistically imputed and politically connected to a usually weaker society (incl. detached and segregated youth cultures).
Original Pan-Arabic Islam may be seen as a political/militaristic tool for the transition from kinship to kingship. See, for example, Klevius' Definition of religion (most popular on MSN) and What is true Islam? for the historical roots of this movement which was almost dead when it became rescued by Westerners (from Los Angeles) who found oil in Saudi Arabia! Ironically it seems that LA/Hollywood now is accused by Islamic fundamentalists for the spreading of "deprived culture", while the same LA/Hollywood is accused, by Klevius and others, for being the main supporters of Islam. Also see From Freud to bin Laden It's also noteworthy that bin Laden actually defends what he considers his right ethnicity while Western converts or Islam supporters betray their own! But compared on pair, bin Laden's local (in time and space) Arabic Islamism can never compete with its intruding competitor, the idea of every human's negative (i e freedom from submission) rights.
For a better understanding of the social-historical background see Klevius' analysis of the transition of different types of societies in Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor!
Modern, oil-fueled Pan-Arabic Islam, meets the Western social state (see Klevius' Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state) and detached individuals (see Klevius' work on how sex segregation and lack of family attachment have evolved into state sanctioned child trading and accelerated rootlessness).
Detachment and sex segregation are the main entrances into Islam.
Many falsely assume Islam could be an answer, i.e precisely what many thought about the 1930's fascist movements! As it's a well established fact that women in the 1930's were very eager supporters of fascism (see Angels of Antichrist), no one should be surprised when western women now support Sharia and even infibulation etc (i e heavy mutilation of the genitals of small girls). These contradictions can only be understood in the light of the feminist contradictions in the women's movement itself (see Klevius Definition of feminism + links).
But the simple fact is that attachment doesn't need medieval Mideastern religions, but rather a less separatist (generational, physical and relational) reality to eliminate most of youth criminality etc. And, as outlined in Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state, there is no connection, or rather a negative one, between the tax money that pours into the social (welfare) state as indirect transfers, and the attachment of children and adults. You may also note that Sweden, the country with the highest taxés, and sometimes by someone considered a welfare state model, has more poor people than the US, if measured by the same standards (in an average city like Borås the average income is roughly the same as the poverty line in the US)! Only in Stockholm 5000 people (99 % whites, by the way) are left on the streets! And now when the Swedish media is full of eager Bush blaming re. Katrin, almost everyone seems to have forgotten that the Swedish government was the worst to take care of its citizens during the Tsunami-catastrophy (see postings 31, December 2004)! The same Swedish government use to feed its jobless friends by offering huge compensations for nothing in return. So, for example, does Lena Häll Eriksson get some US $ 100.000/year although she doesn't have any duties nor place to work! On the salary list she is titled "civil servant with special duties"
It's an equally simple and related fact that modern - what I use to call artificial -sex segregation causes enormous problems, which aren't solved by packing them into "religious"7ideological frameworks. This modern sex segregation has so far been dumped into the social (welfare) state.
What is Sex segregation (Klevius' pages on this topic most popular on MSN).
Youth and women using Pan-Arabic Islamic racist/sexist/fascism as a route for escape - Veiling the detached individual in fascism and sexism - When sex segregation from the Middle Ages meets modern chauvinism/feminism (see Klevius' Definition of feminism - most popular on MSN).
The Islamic veil (see Klevius' Veil trap) - unless it's just plain, superficial fashion - is a racist/sexist offense signing: I think I'm a better person than you non-Muslim, and I think you male might want/have the right to rape or sexually offend me, if I,m not a Muslim and/or if I don't wear the veil! For males the Islamic veil, or just the information that a woman is an Islamist, is good enough to safeguard his own "malehood" status and due chauvinism.
The (naive) Arabic dream of bin Laden & Co is to make possible an Arabic/Islamic social museum without entrances for the "West". Israel, and the Americans (especially the female soldiers) in Saudi-Arabia. And now Bush, Condi, Blair etc, have been the main obstacles for this Islamic Utopia, which, pathetic as it is, however isn't even close to the global neo-fascist evilness hidden behind so called "peaceful and moderate Islam", which in turn sponges on everything from secularism/human rights to personal lunatic ideas bolstered by lonelyness and a contourless and irresponsible Islamic "religion" without anything else in commonh in the end except arbitrary but totalitarian (i.e. depending on power) interpretations of what it is! Except, of course, for Pan-Arabism and political power!
Klevius suggestion: Throw away the Pan-Arabic Islamic veil confining your modern lonelyness and go back to Mom and Dad and upgrade yourself and perhaps even them (or whoever might be appropriate in your case), so you may be rehabilitated for really meeting and relating to other people without racist/sexist separatism! Not like the false "deep religious relationship" in the Islamic Koran cells from which Atta & Co streamed out (via some Western brothels!) to the planes in September 11 2001!
It's an irony, and perhaps even logical, that the secular supporters of modern fascism/sexism, are those supporting a strong leftist state, whereas those warning for it, usually propose "a limited state", well aware of the fact that states can't handle social relations, no matter how much money you give the state bureaucracy, and no matter how nicely you name it! This is why ciitizen salaries etc direct transfers, combined with abduction of tax on work, should be preferred, instead of state bureaucracies.
Do you really want to be part of a new fascist movement? And do you really know how your ideology, religion etc affect the most important of your rights, i e the holy negative human rights? And did you know that these rights are entirely excluded in ALL FORMS OF ISLAM!
Finally, check out your prejudices abt Klevius. The following ones are all wrong:
Klevius has personal reasons for blaiming Islam
Klevius is a Jew
Klevius is a Christian
Klevius is a right-winger
Klevius is rich
Klevius is a neo-liberal
Klevius is a communist
Klevius is Euro-centered
Klevius is a racist (how could he without a race?)
Klevius is a crypto-racist
Klevius is sexist (how could he without a "manhood"?)
Klevius hates Arabs
Klevius is gay
Klevius is homophobic and anti-lesbian
Klevius is anti-hetero sexual
Klevius is a woman
Klevius doesn't know anything abt women
Klevius doesn't know anything abt children
Klevius is paranoid and jealous towards his partner(s)
Klevius has a problem with his sex life
Klevius has a problem with the sex life of others
Klevius has a problem with his family life
Klevius has a problem with the family life of others
Klevius has opinions abt how other people should lead their lives
Klevius is a pervert (so far claimed by none)
Klevius is unhappy
Klevius is a moron (maybe, but he is certainly not alone)
Klevius' sites and blogs, however, seem to be the only ones, so far, emphasizing and rationally connecting modern lack of attachment, the social state, and sex segregation (usually lacking from most analysis, because of feminism etc), into a coherent package (see links above) that makes the easy spreading of Islamic neo-fascism (a Pan-Arabic tool for global neo-imperialism sponsored by oil-money) understandable, and a solution (strenghtening of attachment and negative human rights, de-sex segregation and global as well as local responsibility) possible.
Friday, September 09, 2005
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Black racism & hatred fueled by Arabic oil-Islam. Is Nation of Islam a stealthy fascist terror organization?
JASMYNE CANNICK (African American): "You Don’t Speak For Me Tony Muhammad:
Muhammad is no angel. In fact, he’s far from it. He carries a widely known hatred for police officers and whites and is known for his trademark history of being antagonistic and argumentative.
Earlier this month, Muhammad called a protest against the shooting of a black series in his neighborhood because there were whites on the crew. In fifteen minutes, he managed to assemble over 150 people, who among other things spat on and called the white crewmembers names like "White Devil" and "Cracker.” Muhammad completely ignored the 30 or so Blacks that were working behind and in front of the camera when the show’s supervising producer cancelled the shoot for the day and sent everyone home."
Nicholas Stix: "You have a majority black city whose 480,000 residents were warned to evacuate, yet approximately 150,000 (31.6 percent) declined to. (I am allowing for 10,000-20,000 old and/or disabled people, like the 94-year-old man stuck in his apartment with a dozen eggs and a few gallons of water, who could not evacuate.) Most of the angry people shown waiting for transport appeared to me to be able-bodied. You have armed young black men roaming the city streets, looting, raping, murdering and carjacking. You have rescue workers in helicopters who are fired on by gun-toting “victims,” and who then flee to save themselves. You have national guardsmen in the streets ordered not to do their jobs. You have a black mayor, Ray Nagin, who failed to do his job and then cried racism"
Klevius' comment: No comment!
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
Klevius' anti-racism/sexism sites/blogs grow faster than oil-fueled, racist/sexist Islamic fascism & al-Jazeera!
Klevius' site & blogs now No. 1 on following MSN searches (Sept. 2, 2005):
Definition of religion
Definition of feminism
Negative Human Rights
Hypothesis on consciousness or AI Consciousness
and almost (4) on top:
Out of Africa human evolution
- plus many others.
Klevius' unsponsored (so far - who would sponsor anti-racism & anti-sexism anyway?!At least not together!) IQ-fueled sites & blogs against racism/sexism, grow much faster than oil-fueled racist/sexist Islam & al-Jazeera!
Friday, September 02, 2005
"..."men" had wandered the cavernous convention center in recent nights raping and murdering children. She said she found a dead 14-year old girl at 5 am on Friday morning, four hours after the young girl went missing from her parents inside the convention center. ''She was raped for four hours until she was dead,'' Joseph said through tears. ''Another child, a seven-year-old boy was found raped and murdered in the kitchen freezer last night.'' Several others told similar stories of abuse and murder..."
And the political vultures (often sailing on skin color etc and often pro-Islamic terror supporters when not busy hunting for headline space) were almost equally fast on the scene as was Bush, whom they, of course, blamed for everything including the disaster itself. In Swedish state media it was even argued that the disaster could be traced to Bush not signing the Kyoto pollution treaty* (EU did sign but gravely failed in peactise to come even close to what they had signed! Precisely as they fell short to help/support the Afgans when Bush had removed th Talibans! And the Islamic genocide in Sudan isn't even considered genocide by the EU. That could namely force them to take action!)!
And by the way, is black more correct and potent as a political tool than colors, (incl. white)? It's clearly more talked about anyway!
And every egoistic political bite in Bush’s heal weakens the victimes of Islam and is a laugh for bin Laden and his Islamist supporters who oppose the liberation process in Iraq and elsewhere.
Let's really hope US will not end up with an Islamic constitution!
Nation of Islam, a sexist and racist, fascist movement) - not to mention Muslim Brotherhood etc - is eagerly vulturing on black communities around the US, spreading their evil Islamic ideas.
*) One could well argue that the higher amount of Japanese less-polluting high tech cars in the US compared to EU:s almost racist attitude towards everything Japanese/"Mongoloid" out-balances the US pollution caused by less environmental friendly cars!
Who to blame?
Despite all the talk of nonexistent federal help, aid did arrive early on, even before Katrina hit.
FEMA moved supplies from logistics centers in Atlanta and Denton, Texas, to Baton Rouge and the New Orleans airport. The agency positioned seven search and rescue teams and 23 medical assistance teams from Tennessee to Texas. About 7,000 National Guard troops were deployed in the state. Army Corps personnel started securing the locks, floodgates and other equipment.
But it wasn't enough for this unpredictable scale of the tragedy! And also note that this wasn't a deliberate strike against civilians as are the Islamic attacks!!!
Finally, every victim has my full and equal sympathy, regardless of color or lack of color! Klevius' blogs and sites are socially colorblind, but sometimes get annoyed to people who use skintones as political/"religious" tools for murky purposes, underpinning hatred and racism!