People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.
Saudi war crimes investgated by the Saudis
If China today became a full democracy (and even accepting full Human Rights) - nothing would change, because it's not the rulers but the high tech industry in China that outperforms the West. And unlike islam, China doesn't have tenets against Human Rights. However, islam is tied to its supremacist and sexist sharia tenets (OIC) which deny women full Human Rights - just the opposite to what is said in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948. If islam would accept full Human Rights it would not be islam anymore. China's economic expansion has been a non-aggressive big contributor to wealth around the world, but when China reached out its Belt and Road hand, then the West bit it and supported extremist muslim terrorists. Islam induced hate crimes and terror are based on a shared evil ideology (a global muslim collective rather than as nationals, which inspire and hail each other) - but because most are committed by lonely or gang muslims, and because police and media are told muslim "ethnicity" ought not to be revealed, then the public are kept unaware of most muslim hate crimes. How come that evilness is protected? The answer is in the question. To hide its original evilness. And how come that BBC and UK politicians dare to support islamofascism in Kashmir? Freedom from sharia for women in Kashmir!
* UK PM Theresa May opposed Human Rights.
Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!
Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a teenage woman who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!
Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?
In UK both Tories and Labour are against "islampohobia" - so apparently also against Human Rights? And if not, then they are "islamophobic" after all. So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?
What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.
Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.
BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?
Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?
Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).
A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.
"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.
In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".
The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.
As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.
Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.
Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!
No true muslim can be fully human.
Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.
So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.
A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".
Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world?
Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?
Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.
Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!
The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.
Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!
BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.
However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.
The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).
However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!
BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.
The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.
Peter Klevius evolution formula
Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.
Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!
Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!
- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.
Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?
* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.
Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".
Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.
CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".
A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.
Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.
Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?
Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.
Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.
Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
If this is the case it's torturous and inhumane beyond my understanding. Terri had a healthy body and probably a (at least partly) working brain when this torture aiming for murder begun!!! See other Terri postings below!
Sunday, March 27, 2005
Hidden explanations of Islamic hate crimes: Islamic encouragment of hatred/racism/sexism via concepts such as Jihad and "infidels" would probably be very revealing when it comes to otherwise invisible and puzzling patterns of criminal/racist/sexist behavior. But these kinds of information are mostly suppressed or silenced/avoided by media! This process, I believe, is hence a main contributor to the continuous creation of even more Islamic hate criminals (usually very young and "cool" i.e. confused males) and their victims.
Also see March 4, 2005, posting below: Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" stole Flores WoMan, and Swedish state pedophilia compared to the Jackson case (February 20, 21, 24, 2005)!
Tuesday, March 22, 2005
Read more abt the totalitarian and heavily biased Swedish state media below!
Terri Schiavo may still possess pre-injury memories in her damaged brain. But she may also have created a whole new life based on her 15 years of bed experiences! So even if she didn't recognize her parents as her parents, she may now have included them as well as nurses, doctors, her ex-husband etc in a new pattern of life. When the dcision was made to let her live for many additional years, that decision may well have created a new, conscious human being! Also see EMAH Klevius hypothesis on consciousness!
Excerpts from diagnoses of 6 Schiavo doctors.
Friday, March 04, 2005
Klevius: Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" stole and erred abt Flores "Hobbit" WoMan. Islamic fascism/racism/sexism in Sudan & among youth
Indonesia's most famous (sic) "anthropologist" (who in fact seems to be a Muslim crypto-creationist who now gets support from P. Brown's former supervisor who disliked his now widely accepted findings as a PhD student - in fact, if spiced with Klevius non-simplistic hypothesis Out of Africa as "Pygmies" and back as global "Mongoloids" most parts seem to fit) confiscated the world's most challenging fossils, the Homo Floresiensis, described by Australian, US and Indonesian scientists in October 2004.
"...the one-metre high female and the bones of several other individuals belong to a previously unknown dwarf human species - by far the smallest ever found, with brains no bigger than a grapefruit"
After a computer aided cranial scan it's now stated that:
"What is important is the structure of the brain and she appears to have had some very complicated, convoluted frontal brain structures, which govern higher thinking."
Compare this with the following extract from Klevius' (May 2004) hypothesis: "The last major stage of modern human evolution started (?) <50-80 kya.../...perhaps with small "pygmies" with brains that were much more wrinkled than those of the Neanderthals/Erectus/-Pekingensis/Java man and early moderns."
Muslim terror and pan-Arabic Islamic neo-colonialism aided by a Global Intifada.
Don't let any Musli/Islamic preacher, educator, politician etc. get away with his message/demands before s/he has passed the Klevius fundamentalist test aimed to detect open/hidden totalitarian racist/sexist fascist tendencies just like those among ordinary German citizens who supported Hitler and his Nazi Party?
A powerful and informative source for those who really want to learn more on Islam's own and original "Abu-Graid" is: Legacy of Terror.
Naming totalitarianism religion is handy because it then gets protected by human rights. What if Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin had got their weird ideologies protected by human rights? Now we seem to be facing the very same evil again just because many are so confused that they easily fall in the traps. First we had a social democracy gone bad (national socialist German workers party), then a "world conquering" communism and now a Muslim/Islamic fascism/racism/sexism from Sudan to UN! Will we never learn?
Hitler's Nazi Party programme in a new and, for many perhaps surprising, setting?
Many non-Arabic "Muslims" suffer from the theft of their own history
Contrary to what is often preached Islam doesn't mean peace but submission (corpses are peaceful though - see e.g. The world's longest slave trade: The Islamic Holocaust in Africa)! But sadly many name their historical cultural belonging wrongly either after their former and contempoorary oppressors (e.g. as being Muslims because one's ancestors lost the war) or against their former oppressors (compare the strange notion of "Afro-Americans").
Crypto-terrorism 1: Another Indonesian pecularity reflecting the strong but stealthy ties between radical and moderate Islamists is the lenient sentencing of those responsible fot the Bali bombing:
Indonesian court sentenced fiery Muslim preacher Abu Bakar Bashir to two and a half years
Klevius comment: Two and a half years for encouraging young people to commit racist terror acts against "infidels"!!! Compare this with the recent US discussion about whether young people are too immature to fully understand/control and take responsibility for their actions! However, Islamic Imams and clerics (as well as all those who support their dirty and hidden terror-jihadism) now seem to be the real (but stealthy) bad guys! Why aren't child protectors equally eager to resque these kids from their abusers as they are in other instances? (for more on the horryfying child protection hypocrisy see Angels of Antichrist?
Crypto-terrorism 2: Islamic fundamentalists (with stealthy support from "moderates") sucking/abusing the boiling blood of detached and confused youngsters for the means of Islamic conquest, may be the worst evil in the world of today (albeit often disguised in charity, youth programs etc. - compare Hamas, Hizbollah, Young Muslims etc etc). And the poor people those organizations "aid" (i.e. lock-up in racist/sexist/fascist Islam) continue to suffer. Did Bush and Condi get it right after all?
But always remember the Islamists' words:
"...for the sake of Islam itself, the truth of its teachings should not be so clearly expressed, and acted upon."
Islam's ultimate goal is to rule the world. Sadly many people haven't fully realized the sexist, racist and totalitarian aspects that bind together Jihadists and the smiling Muslim imams. For more on sexism see e.g. From Klevius without love!
The double strategy seems to be to convert as many "normal" youth as possible and then let the weird/stupid ones do the dirty Jihadist job, i.e. to put force behind the message while the "moderate" imams keep smiling meekly!
Also note the important difference between immigrants on the one hand and expansion of Islam on the other! I love immigrants just as I love other people but that doesn't mean I have to love a racist sexist religion of conquest, which preaches that all "humans" are equal but that some humans (infidels) aren't "humans" at all!
Also note that when an immigrant is labelled "Muslim", it's organized by a multinational money and power religion aimed for totalitarian conquest (I don't fear Toyota or Sony at all, nor do I fear the easy to abandon and timid Christian love message, Buddhism etc. or purely secular negative human rights). And what about the unfair power-distribution this causes when compared to those who arrive just like human beings un-contaminated by conquest religion, i.e. who don't act simply as useful tools for a worldwide distribution of pan-Arabism wrapped in sexism and racism, and abusing local power struggles for its own spreading and gaining of power! The naive idea that Islam is just a religion like others is as false as it can be. LISTEN TO ISLAM ITSELF: Islam is the only "true" religion, and is to take over the world and the words of its prophet are sealed! Infidels aren't humans and believers in other gods than Allah are just poorly mislead.
Islamophobia, hence, is a word invented to cover up what is really going on in the confused secularized and individualist Western world and among their naive and shortsighted (and sometimes deliberate) politicians. But Islamophobia could also be used to enlighten the reality, i.e. fear or submission...
For you who want to get a better understanding of religion and sex-segregation see Klevius definition of religion.
After the fall of Hitler's socialist madness we promised to defend freedom and fight totalitarianism in all forms, didn't we? Negative human rights for a positive humane future!
Freedom of religion doesn't cover totalitarianism disguised as religion! Also remember the negative right to freedom FROM religion while still possessing the same human value and dignity as so called "believers"!
"Militant Islam has targeted non-Muslims worldwide, but Muslim Arab militancy also has an ethnic, racist component expressed as intolerance as well toward some fellow Muslims. The victims in Darfur are Muslim but non-Arab, and the slaughter there is only the latest in a series of genocidal assaults by Arab regimes against their non-Arab Muslim populations."
Cowardly journalists support Islamic jihadists while brave women rally against Islamic terror.
March 10, 2005: Perhaps the creepiest of all Islamic terrorist-supporters are those journalists (usually fanatic Bush & Condi-hating wealthy leftists) who deliberately or naively neglect/suppress reality. The contradiction between those rallying against Bush and those women who now rallied against Islamic terrorism in Beslan is striking and thought provoking. Women like these as well as like Ayan Hirsi Ali is what the world nown needs the most!
Horryfying praise of Islam and Islamic terror on the Swedish state radio:
Every week Swedish state radio praises Islam and questions Christianity in different programs, not the least in a weekly documentary "People and belief". The way it's done is very biased. So, for example, the reporter pretends to defend freedom of religion in general but ultimately always ends up with a particular support and emphasise on Islam. And the Islamists terror attack in Madrid is described as a "success" and that many thinks there should be more of the same...!!!
Sweden imports and protects war criminals and Islamic terrorists.
A former Feyahedin (remember those sleazy/creepy guys who used to "surrender" and then started shooting US soldiers) massmurderer tells via Swedish state radio how "he has now changed his mind" and how he plans to live in Sweden. His lawyer tells us that the Swedish law allows these kinds of human waste to live here without fear for prosecution. And a "converted" Hamas terrorist tells how Sweden is considered and advised by human smugglers as the best place on Earth for Islamic terrorists. It's estimated that more than 1000 known war criminals now are protected and supported by the Swedish state! And the immigration office hardly never bother to report the murderers to the police although they admit they know their background!
Islamic genital mutilation opens for immediate US visa for Somalis and others.
March 12, 2005.
A court ruling in CA now opens up for unlimited import of African Islamists.
In other words, those who mutilate their girls (my anthropology lecturer in the 90s told us that women where in fact the most eager ones to uphold this bloody tradition) now, in practice, get rewarded for it. The "continuing harm" that pan-Arabic Islamism causes, now also utilizes infibulation etc. (like human rights) for its conquest in the West (and always connected to local racism/sexism)! This situation is, to a great extent, hence the dirty heritage of more than 1000 years of Islamic pan-Arabic imperialism, rapism, murdering and slavetrading in Africa.
And finally a judicial note. If a harm is already caused and can't be altered by the legal measure proposed, then how can it possibly be a legal motive for such a court ruling?!
Is all of this arranged by racist (some, not all, really are) Afro-Americans (are Muslim blacks more racist? At least many travellers now report such bad attitudes) who want to out-balance the Latinos they have, so far, failed to convert to Islam? Islamic expansion by Arabic oil-money! And by the way, Nelson Mandela, whose ancestors were chased from their homelands in Africa by black Bantu invaders, didn't preach hatred but reconciliation! (also see Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor.
I don't know many Somalis (although I greatly admire and honour Ayan Hirsi Ali) but I'm really disturbed when I hear rumours about strange behavior like waiving with knives, threatening and stabbing if things don't go exactly and immediately their way! Could this possibly be a weird sign messaging a strange "encouragement" from Islamists to "take their revenge and rights" in the Western world of "infidels" and whores. I..e. taught by those Islamic Arabs who were their real oppressors in the past as well as now!
Non-Muslim and non-racist blacks, make a visible statement! You are needed. I know cause my best male friend is a non-Muslim non-racist black (I never realized but others have declared him "black")!
Saud oil-prince Alwaleed (no. 5 on the billionarie's list) is only one of the faces behind the transition from oil-to-Islam world conquest. He has promoted the establishment of centers for Arab/Islamic studies at several universities in the United States. The professors and students hence fertilized end up as either Islamic (stealthy) fanatics or "moderate" ones who have to struggle a two-front war for their own survival (not the least when visiting or facing Islamists from their home countries etc). I personally know some...
Take your local Muslim friend out for a nice chat and face him/her with the Fundamentalist test. If s/he passes s/he is harmless and no real Islamist. If not, then s/he probably is no real friend or you yourself fail the test!
The recent Armonious Family's murders in Jersey City seems to be part of a pattern of Islamic intimidation described above as the stealthy link between "moderate" Muslims and Islamists. The Forward reports that Rafique Iscandar claims Egyptian diplomats are pressuring American Copts to stop complaining about the harassment they get in the US from Muslims. The same Muslim community produced Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind minister who is in prison for his role in the first World Trade Center bombing. Rahman's Leftist attorney, Lynne Stewart, was convicted for carrying Rahman's terror orders from prison to his followers.
Part of the creeping totalitarian Islamic strategy is to (on top of violent actions and threatenings usually delegated/fertilized to the lowest part of the Islamic world organization) abuse human rights and the justice system.
Important legal advice: It cannot be considered a hate or bias crime if a totalitarian and anti-(negative)human rights ideology is the target. A crimie perhaps but not necessarily a bias crime. A totalitarian and ant-(negative) human rights ideology hence cannot refer to itself as a religion in the hate/bias crime sense. This is the case with neo-nazis as well as Islamists who consider some people "infidels"! Whoever Muslim who continues to accept the notion of "infidels" can never refer to hate/bias crime when he is assaulted - only to crime. So in conclusion every Muslim who refers to hate/bias crime should be asked to openly and officially state that s/he condemns the Islamic notion of "infidels" and what it implies!
We should all be biased against totalitarian, racist ideologies, shouldn't we?
Islam has to completely castrate itself (before reality castrates Islam anyway) from its sexist, racist totalitarianist "infidel" ideology or step back from human rights and other legal democratic demands in the free world! It's now everyone's responsibility to demand Islam to openly show its cards. I bet Islam will loose most of its virility in that maneuver (just like Christianity did - see Klevius definition of religion)! Should I feel sorry for it?
Haven't read the Afgan constitution but it looks like it's a new taliban disaster. Sad...
March 14, 2005: 1) Four men from Mideast raped/abused a girl who just had turned 13 (rapes are incredibly common in Sweden - see postings below). No one even mentioned pedophilia and the men were freed. 2) A 64 year nice man asked Swedish police to stop some young criminals but was instead brutally beaten by the male and female polices in front of a video camera (allegedly because he didn't immediately lift his arm from the car door he was leaning towards while speaking to the polices inside. 3) Two teenage girls were brutally assaulted, robbed and raped by four men but the police didn't investigate it due to "lack of time". And today the Swedish state news asks the police to be even more careful not to be biased towards "certain" (criminals encouraged by the Islamic racist/sexist notion of "infidel"?!) groups!