Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism
Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?
* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).
Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?
Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".
* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.
This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.
Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Monday, January 31, 2005
Bush: ''The world is hearing the voice of freedom from the center of the Middle East,''
Klevius' comment: Did Condi and Bush get it right after all? Bush's and Condi's critics referred (in 2003) to the same international law that now finally has made possible what Saddam and Islamists have denied Iraqis (and would have continued to do if Bush hadn't stopped them - note that I didn't even mention UN, France etc). But the next question is: Why have people accused Bush for the victims of Saddam and Islamic terrorists while the real culprits hide in Koran schools etc! There they sit now in "peace" with all the young brainwashed suicide killers' (and their victims') blood on their hands!
Sunday, January 30, 2005
Note that some might confuse cultural traditions as Islam because some people's cultures have been destroyed in the world's worst slave trade.
Definition of religion and the Fundamentalist test
So what should Muslims do? Well, simply admit that whoever non-Muslim has the equal value and status as a human being and stop the despice of others. This vill of course undermine Islam to become an individualistic and castrated “secular religion” under Negative Human Rights far from the lunatic ideas of bin Laden and his supporters. But that’s hardly a problem of ours, is it?
Thursday, January 27, 2005
Sweden, the Islamic sexist/rapists' haven? Mideast pedophiles freed in court while state media/feminists dupe and distract...
Klevius' comment: When the father at ten o'clock was about to go out searching for his daughter she arrived and collapsed in front of him. The Swedish "welfare state" (the world's most costly) will not, of course, help them economically to appeal to the supreme court so now the angry neighbours have started a whip-round, although the chances for justice may be slim, not to say none, even then. When the father later met one of the freed perpetrators, this just sneered to him.
Because of an extremely pro-Islamist/terrorist (also see other postings below) attitude among Swedish politicians and bureaucrats one may be allowed to think the thought that the court decision might had been different if the rapists had been white middle-aged Swedish/Nordic males (and even non-Muslim males from Mideast might have been more harshly sentenced). It's also worth mentioning that a Swedish man got 14 years in prison for allegedly having had sex with his daughter (who lived with her mother at the time). The daughter "remembered" in 2000 as a woman in her 30s having had sex in the 80s in a confined space which didn't even exist at the time being (also see Angels of Antichrist - Swedish child trading). Note that I don't know for sure as yet if the youngsters were really from Muslim families (the Swedish news constantly suppress such important info as being "racist") but I do know that the tendency in Sweden clearly paves the way for an extremely pro-Muslim/Islamic/terror attitude in general (to the expense of other ideologies/systems of belief or freedom from "system of belief" and people in general). In fact it seems that the Swedish system of state controlled/directed political discourse loves to blurr the line between Muslim Islamists and other immigrants in Sweden and then equalizing any attempt to question this with "racism").
Swedish media constantly call children who rape children (e.g. the 16 year old child who raped the barely 13 year old girl above) "men" while the same media in other contexts equally constantly describe nude pics of almost 18 year old females as child pornography and those who look at them as pedophiles. Please, be consequent, will you!
In today's evening news the state TV informed about the horrible neo-nazi threat (a few lost and loosely connected mostly teenagers - quite often those who have been fostered in the state's foster institutions) and immediately afterwards (in the same news) a flattering description of Arab/Mideast culture. No mentioning about the barely 13 year old girl who had been raped, maybe because of this culture and maybe because the perpetrators had been learnt from home and from Imams that "unbelievers" are no real humans and that she hence was considered an "infidel whore".
A brief political background to why small people don't count in certain states: The social democratic/socialist Sweden (ruled by one man and with a meaningless constitution), Saddam's (and other Arab fascist states) National Arab Socialist Baath Party, Hitler's National Socialist Worker's Party (a derivative of the German Social Democrats) and Stalin's Communist Party (a derivative of the Russian Social Democrats), all have state controlled totalitarianism in common. In this sense they constitute the very opposite to Bush's and Condi's "limited state" view. Sweden is hence the most "unlimited" Western state on Earth and after 80 years of one-party brainwashing even most of the Swedes think it's just OK! That's probably also why the Swedes senslessly and fanatically hate Bush more than any other people on Earth (including Arab/Islamic fundamentalist states) with the possible exception of North-Korea.
In the parliamentary process a pro-expanded state socialist usually gets more support than a non-socialist from people who want to sponge on the state! And the bigger the state the more state voters!
Monday, January 24, 2005
Thursday, January 20, 2005
see Did Bush & Condy get it right after all?
Sunday, January 16, 2005
Saturday, January 15, 2005
An Egyptian correspondent, Mahmoud Bakri, writing for Egypt's weekly magazine Al-Usbu', developed an ingenious, conspiracy-laden theory for the disaster. Bakri posed the question "Was (it) caused by American, Israeli, and Indian nuclear testing on the day of horror?"
Klevius' comment: This is Islam!
Tuesday, January 11, 2005
Monday, January 10, 2005
Klevius' comment: This is just a copy of the bigger picture of Islamic expansionist efforts represented by so called "moderate Islamists/Muslims", who "appear to be in collusion" with terrorist murderers and the sexist/racist Islamic/Muslim idea of others than Muslims as "infidels" and of girls/women as sex segregated.
Sunday, January 09, 2005
There is no doubt (according to Colin Powell) that the kinds of tragedies we saw last year that led to my September declaration ... these things are continuing"
For more on Arab/Islamic racism/sexism terror and oil imperialism see:
Klevius' AIQ net
Understanding Muslim fascism
Tuesday, January 04, 2005
and Racist/sexist Hip Hoppers prefer Euro-vulgo in front of sophisticated Japanese high tech
A 16 year old (by the way a common age among terrorists although I don't know anything about this particular guy because media tend to cover these kind of info) targets people and hit and kill a two year old. The poor child was hit with something (according to a police report a small but very powerful one) that exploded into the heart. The murderer (he really aimed, i.e. tried to kill/badly injure sommeone!) was freed after a short chat on the police station. The firework may have been construed for the purpose of violating/killing humans! At least it was used in that way.
A gang targeted a balcony with fireworks and when a 17 year old boy was bypassing they aimed at him and exploded a rocket into his head so he lost his eye and was badly injured.
A firework (possibly homemaid) rocket was deliberately shot into a church where it created many fires and hence destroyed much of the church.
Read about the psycho and soocial state on Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship and other links on Klevius' AIQ net and World Values Survey
And the police don't even care anymore because there is nothing they can do as long as the system works in such a stupid manner as it really does. Furthermore the police is made busy to chase people who are suspected of not paying enough taxes to the country (Sweden) with the highest taxes and the lowest quality of education and care(within OECD).
It's illegal for children and youth under 18 to handle fireworks. Who uses fireworks? Right, mainly children and youth under 18. It's equally "illegal" to punish or sentence someone under 18 (at least in most cases and if the EU's Barnombudsmans get it as they like everyone under 18 can do whatever he/she likes without facing serious consequenses).
What have Sweden, UK, and Holland in common? They are all profiled and long term "welfare" states and they all have leading positions in the world's crime rate statistics!
A criminal behavior that now seems more and more pronounced is the rise of atrocities committed by children and youth who are not mentally ill but wayward in the meaning that they lack proper attachment, possibly sometimes even spiced with racist/sexist religious boosting from others in their environment or via different outside channels (compare Young Muslims etc organizations) and influences.
Monday, January 03, 2005
Klevius' comment: No comment needed (see www.klevius.info links)
Sunday, January 02, 2005
In today's Expressen (Swedish main news paper) the editorial headline states: "Warm people, cold state". Although the 80 year long one party (socialist) ruling in Sweden might have succeeded in creating a less warm people than average (see World Values Survey), the headline (2005) seems well in line with Klevius' statements from 2004 below (see e.g. Psycho-vultures).
For more on the unhealthy Swedish state supported Freudian psychology/psychiatry see:
Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship
The Swedish sycho state
Swedish child trading with the help of pseudo science