Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

The hotline closed since 1400 years - leaving muslims on their own

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Friday, May 08, 2009

Survey on British muslims confirms governmental discrinmination of non-muslims & the evilness of islam

Where Musharraf at least tried something, evil/stupid (& now also a war criminal because of his extended terrorist attacks against civilians by the help of unmanned drones) illegitimate Mr X "president" & his Sharia islamofascist accomplices push Pakistan & civilians around the world into disaster, not the least because of "respect" for the racist sexist death cult called islam.

In UK, 82% of muslims said British muslims are loyal while only 36% of their neighboring infidels agreed. UK muslims showed more faith in their country's government than infidel Brits. 83% of British muslims believed that their infidel nation's elections were fair, while only 57% of the infidels themselves did. 76% of British muslims believed in the integrity of the justice system, while only 55% of the infidel Brits trusted the courts.

Islamofascist Dalia Mogahed, executive director of the islamic Gallup Centre for Muslim Studies: If the integration debate defines people as people looking the same or thinking the same in terms of morality, then it's natural for general public to assume Muslims are not loyal, but if the focus is widened and takes into account how people actually identify with their country and how much they identify with institutions, then it would draw a different picture.

KLevius comment: Indeed! A crisp clear reflection of islam's fascist soul. What this "survey" actually shows is the bias of political correctness poured over the Brits. The more favoured the muslims are compared to other groups (incl. "Brits") the more these same muslims will "trust" the government & vice versa! Moreover, coming from an islamic country most non-islamic nations will appear a better choice. So why do these "muslims" want to bring the evil islam with them?!

Muslim extremism against homosexuals (homophobia) sexual freedom etc.

0% think homosexual relations are acceptable, 3% think unmarried relations are acceptable

KLevius comment: And most muslims support apostasy ban & infidel hatred. However, the survey fits neatly within historical islam, the worst racist/sexist crime ever against humanity!

Friday, May 01, 2009

"Peaceful islam" again fighting itself? Muslim civil war in Pakistan: Original islam vs Obamaislam? Or what's the point?! Continued rapetivism?!

Definition of rapetivism

Islamic Sharia courts ("moderate Talibanism"?) established in conflicted area.

Stupid muslim born (but without a birth certificate proving he is a "natural born" U.S. citizen) & unconstitutional (i.e. "respecting anti human rights & anti democratic islam") Mr X "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever his true name/nationality/"faith" is) seems to share the view on Sharia not only with the Saudi islamofascists he is bowing in front of on the pic to the left, but also with the islamic Pakistan army, government, the islamic Taliban terrorists & Al-Qaeda.

According to Paki authorities the Taliban have no reason to fight because the Paki government has agreed to install Taliban Shariah courts based on Koranic/islamic law, throughout seven districts in the Malakand region, incl. Swat and Buner.

General Abbas: “If peace can be brought in the region without further destruction, then it will be a victory for all."

Klevius comment: Brilliant! But unfortunately he forgot the last word, 'islamists' from the sentence! Or is it just the usual islamist rhetoric, i.e. that "all" means only those who submit to islam?! Friends of freedom won't applause it. Islam is Sharia "peace" under submission of the same islamic sword that initially used to be waived by the islamist preacher in the original mosques (also consider Origin of mosque)!

In Karachi (population 14 million) islamic street terrorists have recently caused at least 34 people being killed and at least 42 wounded. Also in in Baluchistan the government has "failed to calm public anger over the killing of three nationalist leaders". Klevius comment: And the real culprit is Saudi islamofascist "king" Abdullah (& Co), who represents the main sponsors of evil world jihad, & to whom Mr X "president" bowed so deeply!

Cowardice & stupid muslim born & unconstitutional Mr X "president" has already (within his first 100 days) managed to commit senseless war crimes

Stupid muslim born (but without a birth certificate proving he is a "natural born" U.S. citizen) & unconstitutional (i.e. "respecting anti human rights & anti demcratic islam") Mr X "president" Barry Barack Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever his true name/nationality/"faith", if any, is) has deliberately murdered scores of civilians by allowing an extremely extended (& expanded) irresponsible use of drone bombings.

The inevitable (but desperately rejected) conclusion

There's only one true islam, the original ugly one! The pathetic notion that "most muslims are moderate" is as empty as the islamists Cairo declaration on "human rights (the one created for the sole purpose of making it possible for islam to continue treating girls/women as sub-humans"!

A useful feminist idiot or just an intellectual whore?

Irshad Manji (has written The Trouble with Islam Today)(in the notorious series of misleading islam excuses): "As a reform-minded Muslim, I admit that these guys make the notion of diversity in my faith look laughable. Salafis displace pluralism with puritanism. True to the dictates of dogma, they use intimidation and violence to spread their gospel. This summer, a small but steroidal gang of Islamists assaulted human-rights activists in Jakarta. Police stood by as the extremists crashed a religious freedom rally, organized after Indonesia's government imposed restrictions on a minority Muslim sect. Salafis call the move a defense of Islam's integrity. Pluralists call it a violation of Indonesia's Constitution. Moderate Muslim leaders call it none of their business.

In only 10 years, Islamism has gone from being a joke to a force.Like Muslims elsewhere, Indonesians are watching the import of Saudi-style Islam. Sometimes known as Salafism, it preaches a borderless caliphate anchored in the moral absolutes of the Prophet Muhammad's initial successors. A global village for the virtuous and valorous, Salafism purports to offer a way—no, the way—to combine reverence with modernity. Binding black and white, rich and poor, woman and man, mighty and weak, the theory of Salafism is transcendently pluralistic.

Then there's reality. In practice, Salafis displace pluralism with puritanism.

Klevius comment: I rest my case! Ijithad is an unnecessarily prolonged way out of islam. And the reason why some people stubbornly continue excusing islam while its victims in Darfur & around the globe suffer, is that they haven't (or just don't want to) fully accept the grim historical origin of islam.

Islam isn't born out of evil, it's evil itself institutionalized, which fact easily explains islams fast initial progress through the empty deserts into civilization where it planted its poisonous Sharia sword & started sucking for its own survival! What naive or deliberate (or simply ignorant) historians read as "tolerance" against non-muslims is, in fact, the same kind of "tolerance" every parasite shows its host! And also remember that the original & eternal islamic currency is called slaves! This is the whole point of Koranic infidel racism

Btw, isn't it quite a strange "logic" that the same people who now defend a Utopian non-existing "islam" & explain evil islam's evil consequences as "unislamic" are the ones who see history as testifying that "islam tolerated other cultures" when, in fact, this "tolerance" was truly unislamic & a consequence of necessitating circumstances?!

Islam is every bit compulsion!

It seems that the defenders of the worst crime ever against humanity are running out of ammo when they stubbornly try to cling at one (heavily misinterpreted) sentence in islam's Kampf: "There's no compulsion in religion". However, there was no such word as 'religion' in Arabic! And, as noted by Daniel Pipes, "this deceptively simple phrase historically has had a myriad of meanings". As stupid or deliberate islam supporters seem to have no problem pointing at a single verse among an abundance of its opposite, one may also consider Sura 8: 12: "Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them," or Sura 2: 191 which states: "And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out". Compulsion is certainly implied in Sura 9: 29: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya (a tax paid by Christians and Jews) with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

In its context "there's no compulsion in religion" is followed by “The correct has been distinguished from the wrong”, i.e. referring to conversion, & implying that because islam is perfect (i.e. totalitarian) there's no need to abandon it. Moreover, this has to be put in the context of islamic infidel racism connected to jihad, slave-taking & rapetivism (see Origin of islam).