Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

Myth vs Truth

Mazda Luce 1800 (1968, same body as 1500, 1966 - already presented in 1964 at the Tokyo Motor Show it was in serial production 1965) was one of the fastest in its class in the 1960's (104 hp/1050 kg and an extremely long stroke but smoothly reving OHC engine with roller lifters etc) and one of the few cars faster than its speedometer. It also had the best manual gearbox. However, due to stupid Japanese consumer surveys some export models were slowed down with automatic and the interior destroyed with a front bench! Same car was also available with Mazda's own super fast, and functioning Rotary (not the non-functioning German Wankel) engine.
How come that Subaru in 1972 introduced 4WD almost a decade before the first European (the poor quality Audi Quatro in 1980)? And how come that Honda does the most advanced eco car (Clarity FCX) and the most advanced robot (Asimo - the one islamists drool over below) whereas BMW does nothing by itself?
How come that Japanese Nissan GTR ($84,000) easily outperforms Bugatti Veyron ($1,700,000) on Germany's foremost race track Nurburgring?! And that the world's best luxury sports car, Lexus LFA, is the fastest ever real car on the ring, beating the best Porsche by some 4 seconds!

Whereas Shinto, the world's oldest religion, has been the master of technology, islam has been the master of crimes and parasitism!
To deny the evil parasitic origin of islam is equally criminal as to deny the Holocaust!

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

The hotline closed since 1400 years - leaving muslims on their own

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst hate crime ever - now protected by sleazy OIC) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. Also compare Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Klevius: If truth offenses muslims, should the truth then be forbidden?

Mohammed: I have never come across anyone more lacking in intelligence, or ignorant of their religion than women.

Warner: The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

OIC (57 muslim populated nations) have agreed to replace UN Human Rights with islamic "human rights" (Sharia) so that girls and women shouldn't be allowed to be equally free as men! OIC now wants to get veto right in UN so to block any UN action critical against islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

How Islamofascism is boosted by BBC

This is Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (nephew to the world's worst dictator), a "man" who has never worked but who at 56 was accused of raping a 20 year old, and who has spent much more Western oil money on islamic hate mongering propaganda etc than he has officially been given from the dictator house of Saud (which was founded on an Arab slave plantation and later stole the whole land with some handfuls of men and now prosper on oil that "Westerners" found and produced because of "Wests" superior technology)! It's ONLY because of "Western" oil money that this islamofascist Human Rights violating dictator/mafia family is allowed to enter civilized rooms! But should we really let this extreme hypocrisy and bigotry continue?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Out of Africa as an apelike chimp/Homo hybrid and out of Asia as fully modern humans

The Homo skull was big already hundreds of thousands of years ago without really performing anything worth of mentioning. However, some 40,000 yrs ago a sudden explosion in creativity emerged among humans in the north lacking archaic (apelike) features! Again, only Klevius offers the answer (2004): It wasn't a bigger skull but a more sophisticated brain that made the trick! And this new brain genome we got by hybrdizing with our closest relative, a chimplike ape whose brain had been more sophisticated because of jungle adaptation. Just like Honda etc vs BMW etc - quality instead of cc! Or islamic rapetivist collectivism instead of freedom for the individual! In conclusion Homos needed bigger brains when they stepped out from the jungle to the open savannah many Millions of years ago. So they simply grow bigger until a chimp/human hybrid gene flow caught up with them. Adaptation to the cold Asia was then the final stage. (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BY KLEVIUS)

See the fascinating truth: Why didn't fully modern humans evolve in Africa? And why weren't you told?!
The pic is a reconstruction made on a Homo floresiensis skull. H. floresiensis was an apelike creature who used same type of stone tools as Homo erectus although the former had less than half the brain size.

Islam heavily intervened in the discovery of Homo floresiensis via its Indonesian representative the so called "anthropologist"* Teuku Jacob who stole the remains and even damaged them!

* Teuku Jacob was the head of Indonesian "anthropology" & hence closely tied to "muslim interpretations", i.e. essentially a crypto-evolutionist, i.e. one who believes in evolution only when it doesn't involve humans. Whereas Klevius proposes a streightforward evolutionary explanation to the emergence of modern humans, islamists want to have it a "divine intevention" when the human "spirit" entered the brain. Compared to Klevius explanation, this naive (or deliberate) confusion misses the very point, namely that we are 100% mixed with the rest of nature, & that there's not the slightest hint of any "divine spirit" other than that an ape brain that was better structured than the Homo brain ("Homo" floresiensis is probably a wrong & misleading name), entered the Homo skulls via hybridization & as a consequence got much more space. If this is "divine" then whatever could be called "divine" hence making the wording pure non sense (see more on Philosophy in depth by Klevius)!

We don't consider apes humans, do we. We don't even call the apelike Homo floresiensis human. So why call those Homos who happened to walk on two legs & superficially resembling us humans?!

What is extremely confusing for many, & understandably so, is the fact that the dumb Homos were much bigger & humanlike than the pygmy sized hybrids which spread out of Africa (& East Asia?). See Klevius Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids! A completely new understanding of the human evolution will open up in front of your eyes - supposing you open them!

Cro Magnon (Europe) skull 28,000 bp representing a typical Aurignacian. The Cro Magnon skull was in fact some 15-20% bigger than the average of today. This is because the adaptive pressure for the evolution of intelligence has long since stopped because there cannot be any real evolution among us anymore (only a variety of gene expressions) because we're simply too many & too mixed for evolutionary niches to survive long enough (not even the remotest tribes usually fulfil this criterion). In fact, as I wrote in Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992), we may well already have slipped into a slight retardation. This would certainly explain the many stupid "anthropologists" etc out there, wouldn't it!

The hallmark of modern humans, Aurignacian culture, never developed in Africa but only in Eurasia.

Aurignacian is the hallmark of the emergence of truly modern humans, i.e. people who are clearly distanced from the level of culture seen among e.g. Homo floresiensis, Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis & even so called "modern sapiens" etc more apelike creatures.

Unfortunately (but logically due to the climate situation back then) Aurignacian is centered in Europe & northern Asia hence making it politically incorrect.

Aurignacian culture is solely associated with skulls much more sophisticated (i.e. less archaic) than ALL other such cultures & started after 40,000 years ago so whatever is presented for you before that is not made by humans but by Homos or other apelike creatures. No, Klevius isn't racist against apes or Homos but just wants to distinguish between them & human creatures in accorance with YOUR view on what to be considered human!

There's rights now an exhibition at the David H. Koch Hall of Human Origins at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, which is such a charlatan example of misleading & confused "science" you can ever imaging.


akhter said...


Only 60 years ago, researchers confirmed that man does not come into existence all at once, but rather he passes through stages of development one after another. However, the Holy Quran already has this information.

Shaykh al-Zandaani said, we met an American professor, one of the greatest American scientists, whose name was Professor Marshall Johnson, and we told him that it says in the Quran that man is created in stages. When he heard this, he was sitting down, but he stood up and said, “Stages?” We said, “That was in the seventh century CE! This Book came and said, man was created in stages.” He said, “That is impossible, impossible.” We told him, “Why do you say that?” This Book says (interpretation of the meaning):

"He creates you in the wombs of your mothers, creation after creation in three veils of darkness" (The Quran, 39:6)

"What is the matter with you, that [you fear not Allah (His punishment), and] you hope not for reward (from Allah or you believe not in His Oneness).While He has created you in (different) stages" (The Quran, 71:14)

Then he sat back down on his chair and after a few moments he said, “There are only three possibilities. The first is that Muhammad had a huge microscope through which he managed to study these things and he knew things that the people did not know, and he said these things. The second is that this happened by accident, it was a coincidence. The third is that he was a Messenger from God.” We said, “With regard to the first idea, that he had a microscope and other equipment, you know that a microscope needs lenses, and lenses need glass and technical expertise and other equipment. Some of this information can only be discovered with an electron microscope which needs electricity, and electricity needs knowledge which should have been acquired by an earlier generation. It is not possible for this knowledge to have been acquired all at once in a single generation; the previous generation would have had to strive hard in developing science and transmitting it to the next generation, and so on. But for this to be the work of one man, with no one coming before him or after him, either in his own land or the neighbouring lands for the Romans, Persians and Arabs were ignorant and had no such equipment, for one man to have all these instruments and tools which he did not pass on to anyone else this is not possible.” He said, “That’s right, it would be very difficult.” We said, “And for it to have been an accident or coincidence, what would you think if we said that the Quran did not mention this fact only in one verse but in several verses, and that it did not refer to it in general terms but that it gave details of every stage, saying that in the first stage such and such happens, in the second stage such and such happens, in the third stage and so on. Could that be a coincidence?” When we explained to him all the details of those stages, he said, “It is wrong to say that this is an accident! This is well-founded knowledge.” We said, “Then how do you explain it?” He said, “There is no explanation except that this is revelation from above!”

Obtained from the website by Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

klevux said...

"HUMANS WERE CREATED IN STAGES", just like Koran/islam! Mohammed didn't even officially exist before Malik "invented" him when he compiled the first official version of Koran. It's a confused collection of Jewish, Zoroastrian etc thoughts spiced with the utmost parasitism & put together in an effort to make a "moral" for infidel slavery & rapetivism!

All "religions" are based on "beliefs" & hence outside logic! However, islam is special in that it has excluded Allah alltogether & replaced it with Mohammed & his lunatic interpretors. Islam was & is the "faith" in the logics of theft & slavery. This is why there is no truly islamic science in history, only captured non-muslim scientists under the threat of apostasy ban! Everything progressive muslims have learnt from real civilizations.

And when should Koran/islam pay for its atrocities throughout 1400 yrs incl. the total destruction of the African continent?!

akhter said...

Who wrote the Quran,have a look!!

Anonymous said...

Here, have a look:

Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever nor any form of religious pronouncement”.

Bite the bullet dude, and check the mirror!