Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Saudi based OIC (all muslims Ummah organization via UN) and its islamofascist* Fuhrer Iyad Madani: Violent? Me? Just trying to sharia punish Charlie Hebdo!


* The original UN Human Rights declaration from 1948 was meant to be a final bulwark against fascism. However, by calling Human Rights violating sharia "islamic human rights" and by the help of a bunch of Human Rights violating muslim member states, the Saudis managed to bypass this bulwark and can now in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way argue that they follow "human rights" when they in fact do the very opposite!

Dear reader, it's Charlie Hebdo, Raif Badawi and (to a lesser extent) Peter Klevius with the Human Rights sword against Saudi oil Billionaires and their sharia scimitar. Whose side are YOU on?! Should Charlie Hebdo be prosecuted in accordance with islamofascist sharia?


Charles Martel was the guy who 732 saved France from muslim jihadist "crusades". 

Is OIC now shooting itself in the foot? Or will it again be aided by Western PC politicians?


Saudi Secretary General of Saudi based OIC, Iyad Madani (member of the dictator "house" of Saud): The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) intends to take legal measures against the French magazine, Charlie Hebdo, for publishing "blasphemous" (according to sharia) cartoons. OIC is studying Europe and French laws and "other available procedures" (UN?) to be able to take legal action against Charlie Hebdo. If French laws allow us to take legal procedures against Charlie Hebdo, OIC will not hesitate to prosecute the French magazine. This publication by Charlie Hebdo requires necessary legal measures (to comply with Human Rights violating muslim sharia). These cartoons have hurt the sentiments of muslims across the world. This is hate speech (according to Human Rights violating sharia) and must not offend others.

Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia presenter: What do you make of it? Are your "sentiments" hurt, and dou you also think Charlie Hebdo people need more suffering? BBC and you seem to be totally unaware (see screendumps below) of this Saudi islamofascist  threat. Luckily you have Klevius to help you in your heavy task of informing about really essential news.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo



Charlie Hebdo's editor-in-chief GĂ©rard Biard: "We do not attack religion, but we do when it gets involved in politics. If God becomes entangled in politics, then democracy is in danger. Some of Charlie Hebdo's staff members are religious, but choose not to be offended. To be a believer is a personal choice that concerns no one else. We respect that, in the same way that we respect a person's private life as long as the individual does not bring his or her private life into the public sphere.



Klevius: So what does UK's OIC loving muslim sharia Minister of faith islamofascism, Sayeeda Warsi make of it? Declaring the British parliament "islamophobic"?!





Here some screen dumps of 20 Jan 2015. As you can see, BBC seems quite uniterested in the OIC/Madani issue:




No surprise here.



.

No comments: