Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, January 04, 2015

Is Ani Zonneveld just so ignorant about islam - or is she just deceiting you?


Klevius thinks Ani Zonneveld would do better fearing Human Rights violating islam than Human Rights defending "islamophobes"


Ani Zonneveld, president of Muslims for Progressive Values (sic): 'Where is Sharia law coming from? It is man-made.'






Klevius: Everything in islam is man made. What would not be man made?! However, this ridiculously ignorant "muslim" seems to have completely missed Saudi based and steered OIC's wahhabist sharia declaration which via UN now informs legislations for over a billion muslims.

Ani Zonneveld: What first brought me to activism was my personal experience of gender inequality within the Muslim community in the US. I was surprised to find that some in my Muslim community thought that as a female singer my voice is "aurat," an extension of my body that also needed to be covered. This was an alien concept for me, given that for centuries Muslim women have contributed to music and singing. That forced me to reassess. Going back to the community I was part of was not an option.


Klevius: And that wasn't enough for you to get the truth about islam. No. instead you had to start creating a childish daydream "islam" that has never existed and never will exist - and thereby playing straight in the hands of the islamofascists.

Ani Zonneveld: The problem: There are so much radical, hateful and extreme interpretations of Islam on-line. They target the youth, they dumb it down, they appeal to the ego and to the exclusive notion of supremacy. (This is not that much different from White Supremacy, or any supremacist ideology, but as a Muslim I want to talk about Islam.)

Klevius: A muslim can't and isn't allowed to "talk about islam"! But don't panic Ani, you've proven beyond any doubt that you're no real muslim. However, the most powerful 'radical, hateful and extreme interpretations of islam' comes out of UN  but is rooted in wahhabist Saudi islam.


 Muslims for Progressive Values (they perform same-sex muslim marriages!) and its Malaysian American musician head Ani Zonneveld, are convoking a global Alliance of Inclusive Muslims to question the right of the regressive Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to speak for the faith internationally. In a June 2014 Geneva press conference, they promised to ‘challenge theological justifications for hate with the progressive values that we feel to be inherent in Islam.’ How can you not be inspired?” 


However, this 'regressive' Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) speaks for islam and all the world's muslims internationally.

Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the worst Human Rights violator, not you Ani Zonneveld, represents islam!

Klevius question to Ani Zonneveld: How much do you have in common with Sayeeda Warsi, UK's "minister of faith islam" who really loves OIC?



Klevius urgent advice to cure Ani Zonneveld's bottomless ignorance about islam: Read and listen to an intelligent woman like Ayaan Hirsi Ali!


Ani Zonneveld's islam is not only completely unfounded wishful thinking - it's also a dangerous prolonging of islamic evil in the world.







.

No comments: