Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Charlie Hebdo caricatures weren't meant to offend - they were meant as criticism with a selling* laugh


* Klevius can be quite funny if he so likes - however, he hasn't chosen that more selling path because it might blur some of his analysis. The whole idea of Klevius writings has been that they not only stand the light decades later, but that they also improve by time (no, you're quite right, Klevius doesn't know the word 'moderate').

The worst you can do is to protect islam and its terrorists with blasphemy laws (sharia - that in the West is hidden behind terms like "hate speech"* etc)

* Criticism can never be "hate speech" and hate speech can never be "criticism"! With this simple formula islamic sharia (in whatever basic Human Rights violating form) inevitably classifies as hate speech and Saudi based and led OIC as a terrorist organization supporting hate.
  



The main problem is OIC's (all muslims sharia Ummah via UN) Human Rights violating sharia declaration which now guides and sanctions not only legislation in muslim majority countries but also the spread of sharia inspired Human Rights violating more or less informal "justice" systems within (and sometimes even nationwide) muslim communities in secular states. And simultaneously OIC makes every effort to push sharia compliant legislation into secular law. One such effort is to criminalize criticism against islam (the worst ever ideological crime against humanity and Human Rights) under the strange cover of "it offends muslims".

If politicians again submit to the jihadists by restricting criticism of islam (the by far worst ideological crime known to history) then it not only equates the desecration of the graves of the Charlie Hebdo victims but also encourages more islam inspired attacks.



Why doesn't BBC's Pakistan/Saudi Arabia raised muslim sharia presenter Mishail Husain never inform about the Saudi/OIC/UN/sharia connection to all the world's muslims?


The "no-go" zones, officially called Zones Urbaines Sensibles (ZUS), or Sensitive Urban Zones formations began in late 1996, and more than 8% of France's population, i.e. some 2/3 of French muslims now live in them. Area locations include the heavily muslim parts of Paris, Marseilles, Strasbourg, Lille and Amiens. Seine-Saint-Denis, a northern suburb of Paris is home to an estimated 500,000 Muslims and 36 of the 40 districts in the area are "no-go" zones.

French rulings and law enforcement are replaced by islamic sharia in the no-go zones. They aren't even allowed in (compare muslim sharia ghettos in Sweden). For example Seine-Saint-Denis experiences frequent acts of violence, riots, fires and shootings everyday by large gangs of the muslim youth.

Washington Times: "France has Europe's largest population of muslims, some of whom talk openly of ruling the country one day and casting aside Western legal systems for harsh, Islam-based Shariah law.France's city officials are slowly losing control of heavily muslim neighborhoods to islamists."

Paul Belien of Brussels Journal: "The ZUS exist not only because Muslims wish to live in their own areas according to their own culture and their own Sharia laws, but also because organized crime wants to operate without the judicial and fiscal interference of the French state. In France, Shariah law and mafia rule have become almost identical."

Soeren Kern at the Gatestone Institute: "What they are trying to do is shut down any sort of criticism of Islam, any sort of speech, cartoons, discussion, anything. Essentially, the French government and the other European governments have lost control over the situation. It's a snowball that is growing bigger and bigger, in particular over the past 10 years. Islam is a permanent part of France now. It is not going away. I think the future looks very bleak. The problem is a lot of these younger-generation Muslims are not integrating into French society. Although they are French citizens, they don't really have a future in French society. They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life."

France is the European country with the largest amount of muslims (12-15%). And they have no control over Islamic activity in the Muslim-fueled "no-go" zones.



 The dark forces against criticism of evil

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (from Pakistan) and Michael Adebolajo, representing different paths of islamic sharia jihad.

 Here's an other muslim sharia voice from Pakistan:



And here's one more sharia jihadist, the UK minister of faith islam, Sayeeda Warsi.



























.

No comments: