Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, January 09, 2015

Klevius question: Why does it matter if Ahmed Merabet was a muslim? And why can't media see the "prophet" Muhammad/al-Bakr (IS) connection?!

Media fuels islamofascism by defending islam

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all belong to the same Human Rights violating "religion"*.

* see Klevius definition of religion (2001)

What if Ahmed Merabet (the murdered police) had been a non-muslim with a non-muslim name? 

How come that media tries to make a point of him having one of France's most common names? What has it to do with anything about his tragic death? And did he beg the muslim terrorist not to shoot him because he was also a muslim? We don't know. What we do know is that he was there to protect those who challenged islam. And that's why he was murdered by a muslim terrorist who would consider such a muslim a traitor against islam. What would a non-muslim police have done? We don't know but one possibility is playing dead instead of appealing. Moreover, this strange media approach completely neglects the position of non-muslims in all of this. The non-muslim "infidel" (in general) seems not to be thought of at all as a victim of islam although islam is all about erasing (i.e. genocide) non-muslims. This is why muslims say everyone is born muslim but those who don't submit to islam are the evil "infidel" ones!

The latest tweet on Charlie Hebdo's account was a cartoon of the Islamic State militant group leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

Klevius analysis: The professional assassinations stay in sharp contrast to the confused behavior by the attackers when arriving at the scene, and lacked completely traces of being planned in advance. This would fit a scenario where Charlie's caricature of Islamic State leader al-Bakr just one hour before, was what triggered the attack. Especially having in mind that Islamic State is on the retreat due to Obomba's air attacks, and the insulting naming of the group by John Kerry and others. It seems that keeping up "respect" is a trade mark of islamofascism.

However, the attackers also reportedly defended their "prophet"* Muhammad - just like most of the world's muslims used to do (and many of them violently) after the Danish caricatures of this so called "prophet". And this really puts the world media in an embarrassing but also revealing light because this connects the "lone wolves" with muslim hotheads and islam more generally. We all remember how media excused muslims' disgusting behavior around the world after the Danish caricatures, don't we!

* according to e.g. Arab historian Hugh Kennedy, there are no traces whatsoever of any Muhammad figure in official Arab records for some half a century after his alleged death. 

Some random notes about he mosque/imam background of the muslim terrorists in France

In a 2008 interrogation session, Benyettou said: "I taught that suicide attacks are legitimate under Islam."

The group linked to Benyettou and Charif was known as the "Filiere des Buttes Chaumont" cell, after a park where the men would jog as part of training that included listening to Benyettou's sermons and how to handle AK-47 Kalashinokovs, the weapons used in yesterday's attack.

An armed-services adviser to President Hollande, Professor Jean-Pierre Filiu, said he has identified possible links between the Paris suspects and Islamic State.

He told AFP that a French-Tunisian jihadist Boubaker el-Hakim and member of Islamic State was part of the same "Butte-Chaumont" network in Paris as Cherif Kourachi.

Hakim assassinated two Tunisian politicians in 2013 and he "represents the link between the Kouachi brothers and [Islamic State]", the professor said.

"I am sure that the video claiming responsibility is already prepared."

It appears Kouachi was a disciple of a janitor-turned-Salafist imam Farid Benyettou. Kouachi worshiped at the Addawa mosque in the 19th ...

Cherif Kouachi once was a part of a plot to send Muslim fighters to Iraq in 2008.

Kouachi once said he was motivated by alleged prisoner mistreatment at Abu Ghraib.

    The so-called 19th arrondissement network is named for the Paris district where it was based, a multi-national neighborhood where families with roots in one-time French colonies in North Africa crowd into housing projects that rise above street markets offering Moroccan melons and pungent French cheese.

    Benyettou practiced a strict Salafist interpretation of Islam, and enjoyed credibility among radicals because his brother-in-law was a convicted member of an Algerian insurgency movement.


No comments: