Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Should it worry the Brits thatTheresa May and the Muslim Sharia Council of Britain* seem to share views on sharia islam and sharia muslims?

* Muslim Sharia Council of Britain of course omits the sharia word from its name in public. However, it's equally certain that they support basic Human Rights violating racist/sexist islamic sharia as it is that the Sun will rise tomorrow. And Theresa May should be aware of this undeniable fact.



Klevius:  What about hateful muslims? Do they exist - and do they divide?



The politically correct answer is that since islam is good then there can't be evil muslims. However, what if islam is exactly as evil as it itself says in the Koran, the Hadiths, and the actions of its attacking and slaughtering "prophet" Muhammad who stays as the raw model for all muslims?

Theresa May says the spying on "extremist muslims" (i.e. muslims inspired by the original so called Medina muslims*) works fine within muslim communities.

* I.e. the very same ideology that UK's "best ally in the muslim world", the Saudi dictator family, distributes with the help of Western oil money.

UK Government scheme Prevent was set up to find and stop so called "radicalisation" (read 'original islam').

But only 280 of 3,288 referrals last year came from the Muslim community
 Muslim leaders in London "fear" the programme is 'spying' on muslim youngsters.

 Theresa May: Donald Trump was “plain wrong” to claim British muslims were not reporting concerns about extremism in their communities.

“I understand he said Muslims were not coming forward in the UK to report matters of concern, this is absolutely not the case, he is just plain wrong,” she told MPs.

“We do see Muslim communities around the UK who are as concerned as everyone else is in the UK both about the attacks that have taken place but about the perversion of Islam.”

Klevius: So "we see muslim communities who are concerned". But what about muslim communities which aren't concerned?

The home secretary said the British government was focused on “uniting our communities not dividing them”.

Klevisu: Sharia is the worst divider ever seen from a Human Rights perspective. But does Theresa May see it as well or is she tied by the sharia finance connections etc.?

Donald Trump said moderate muslims were “absolutely not reporting” would-be terrorists in their communities, and also said the perpetrators of the Paris attacks had been “coddled”.

His claims were rubbished as “bigotry” and inaccurate by the Muslim Sharia Council of Britain.

Theresa May now seems to have sided by the Muslim Sharia Council of Britain's attack on Trump.

“I understand he (Donald Trump) said muslims were not coming forward in the UK to report matters of concern, this is absolutely not the case, he is just plain wrong,” she told MPs.

“We do see muslim communities around the UK who are as concerned as everyone else is in the UK both about the attacks that have taken place but about the perversion of Islam.”


Klevius: Are the violent attacks and slaughterings committed by Muhammad (compare for example the slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina) "a perversion of islam"?


In an interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain this morning, Trump he had “great respect for muslims” and had “many friends that are muslims”.

But when asked what the muslim community should do to prevent radicalism, Trump replied: “I would say this to the muslims, in the United States also: when they see trouble they have to report, and they are not reporting it. They are absolutely not reporting it. That’s a big problem.”



Klevius repeats his more than a decade long suggestion: Ask your muslim friend if s/he approves of sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration in UN).

Miqdaad Versi, assistant secretary general of the muslim sharia Council of Britain, appeared on the show to respond to Trumps claims, and dismissed the notion moderate muslims were not doing enough.


Klevius: Really! I'm so surprised.

He said: “We’ve had mosques that throw extremists out of their midsts. We’ve had many hundreds of muslims reporting other muslims to the police and to counter-terror officials. We have over 90% of muslims saying if there is any muslim within their own community, maybe committing an attack, they would report them.”


Klevius: You have mosques which throw out Shia muslims and other "wrong muslims" as well, don't you. And 90%. That leaves approximately more than half a million British muslims not reporting, doesn't it.

Trump has previously claimed that London is so radicalised that police are afraid to go on the streets, comments allegedly sourced from some Met police officers but officially of course dismissed by the Met Police and the Government.

Klevius: Why would UK be any different from Sweden and other Western countries contaminated with muslim no-go sharia ghettos.






.

No comments: