Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Security logic going dangerously insecure when it comes to muslims and islam


Muhammad's and islam's eternal evil blinked - why?!


Why is every muslim terrorist attack rooted in the ideology of islam immediately followed by a desperate defense of - islam?!


BBC's tactics after every muslim terrorist attack is to cover it in random interviews with people instead of focusing on the root problem.

And so called "security experts across the political spectrum" harshly criticized Trump’s statements about islam and muslims. However, Klevius wonders how one could possibly even be called an expert if one delivers one's "expertise" on a platform as logically unstable as the one that wraps islam and muslims together in one package and calls the blood sipping out of the package "radical" or "not belonging to islam" or "are you a racist?".



Michael Chertoff, who was the secretary of homeland security in the George W. Bush administration: "If you look historically back at people who carried out terrorist attacks in the U.S., many of them didn’t start out as Muslims."

Klevius: Chertoff seems to agree that contrary to muslim beliefs, no one has "started out" as a muslim. Not even the small kids to muslim fathers.


 In this respect Mr. X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) isn't a muslim despite his father being a muslim who hadn't committed apostasy (the worst crime in islam). However, according to islam he is a muslim or an apostate - no other option alloved in this evil ideology.

However, Michael Chertoff's weird statement that "many people who carried out terrorist attacks didn't start out as muslims" needs to be thoroughly scrutinized whoever uses this treacherous logic. "those people" became muslims AFTER having read the Koran and learned about its attacking and slaughtering "prophet" Muhammad. In other words, they were without any doubts inspired by islam when they committed their terrorist acts.

But muslim terrorists constitute just one part of islam's inborn evilness. Targeting only muslim terrorists without targeting the "muslim community" in which these muslim terrorists thrive, only puts more fuel on the fire, because it implies a division within islam between "good islam" and "radical (evil) islam". And the sad fact is that such a division doesn't exist. How could you possibly eliminate Muhammad from islam? And as we all know, the "muslim community" is proud of this attacking and slaughtering "prophet" who followed the simple but evil racist/sexist formula: All non-muslims are infidels and as such less worthy than muslims; so take their girls and young women for sex, live on booty robbed from the victims, use extortion tactics to get money from the wealthy and murder the rest - except for small children who can be brainwashed to become muslims; and, of course, welcome young converts who "didn't start out as muslims" but can help us to attack even more people. And when the enemy (of islam) is too powerful, just lie and do the best of the situation until you have undermined the "infidel community" enough to attack it more seriously.

However, as Klevius has stated for more than a decade: The worst and most dangerous part of the "muslim community" is the Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia declaration via UN, which continues sanctionig and fueling islamic hatred and sexism.. 

 The disgusting islamofascist Saudi dictator family is "our best ally" in muslim Mideast". Really!? Who said?


Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports OIC's sharia declaration against human Rights! S/he might not even be aware of its existence...

.

No comments: