Muhammad's and islam's eternal evil blinked - why?!
Why is every muslim terrorist attack rooted in the ideology of islam immediately followed by a desperate defense of - islam?!
BBC's tactics after every muslim terrorist attack is to cover it in random interviews with people instead of focusing on the root problem.
And so called "security experts across the political spectrum" harshly criticized Trump’s statements about islam and muslims. However, Klevius wonders how one could possibly even be called an expert if one delivers one's "expertise" on a platform as logically unstable as the one that wraps islam and muslims together in one package and calls the blood sipping out of the package "radical" or "not belonging to islam" or "are you a racist?".
Michael Chertoff, who was the secretary of homeland security in the George W. Bush administration: "If you look historically back at people who carried out terrorist attacks in the U.S., many of them didn’t start out as Muslims."
Klevius: Chertoff seems to agree that contrary to muslim beliefs, no one has "started out" as a muslim. Not even the small kids to muslim fathers.
In this respect Mr. X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussein Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) isn't a muslim despite his father being a muslim who hadn't committed apostasy (the worst crime in islam). However, according to islam he is a muslim or an apostate - no other option alloved in this evil ideology.
However, Michael Chertoff's weird statement that "many people who carried out terrorist attacks didn't start out as muslims" needs to be thoroughly scrutinized whoever uses this treacherous logic. "those people" became muslims AFTER having read the Koran and learned about its attacking and slaughtering "prophet" Muhammad. In other words, they were without any doubts inspired by islam when they committed their terrorist acts.
But muslim terrorists constitute just one part of islam's inborn evilness. Targeting only muslim terrorists without targeting the "muslim community" in which these muslim terrorists thrive, only puts more fuel on the fire, because it implies a division within islam between "good islam" and "radical (evil) islam". And the sad fact is that such a division doesn't exist. How could you possibly eliminate Muhammad from islam? And as we all know, the "muslim community" is proud of this attacking and slaughtering "prophet" who followed the simple but evil racist/sexist formula: All non-muslims are infidels and as such less worthy than muslims; so take their girls and young women for sex, live on booty robbed from the victims, use extortion tactics to get money from the wealthy and murder the rest - except for small children who can be brainwashed to become muslims; and, of course, welcome young converts who "didn't start out as muslims" but can help us to attack even more people. And when the enemy (of islam) is too powerful, just lie and do the best of the situation until you have undermined the "infidel community" enough to attack it more seriously.
However, as Klevius has stated for more than a decade: The worst and most dangerous part of the "muslim community" is the Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia declaration via UN, which continues sanctionig and fueling islamic hatred and sexism..
The disgusting islamofascist Saudi dictator family is "our best ally" in muslim Mideast". Really!? Who said?
Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports OIC's sharia declaration against human Rights! S/he might not even be aware of its existence...