Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, March 03, 2016

Mitt Romney again tries to play the race to fit the Saudis. Is he like Hillary paid by the Saudis?




Klevius wrote:

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Klevius presents Mitt Romney: Muslim born apostate (?!) "president" Mr X Hussain Obama's 100% guarantee for re-"election"

 Muslim born (apostate?!) Obama's dream candidate is named Mitt Romney! How did this happen Uncle Sam?!

Is this the first time ever that USA completely lacks a challenger to the sitting "president" (who happens to be a muslim by birth who hasn't dared or wanted to openly and honestly commit apostasy! And by being muslim and/or supporting Sharia he is against US Constitution. 

Not only is the apostasy issue about Obama, but more importantly, about the free world and the medieval Leviathan called islam which now again lifts its evil head through oil wells, now under the OIC Caliphate based in Saudi Arabia and led by its Fuhrer (or Caliph as he prefers himself) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu who wants to globally criminalize research about islam's crimes throughout 1400 years (the worst ideological crime ever) and who has already managed to make 57 states to adhere to OIC's Sharia declaration, usually without the people really knowing much about what's going on.
















One by one every Sharia critical presidential candidate was effectively put aside by the help of Saudi etc owned media (btw, news agencies are relatively cheap to buy and the islamofascists noted this important and effective way of channeling their evil dirt - if you want a REAL CHANGE support Klevius and you will see a huge difference in almost no time!).













Mitt Romney's making a fool of himself differs from Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) many similar moves in that the latter is always excused by the Sharia compliant media. However, the real disaster with Mitt Romney, an ultra rich religious sectarian, is that he is the first presidential candidate created by the media for the sole purpose of paving the way for the only other candidate! End of democracy and in line with islam where democracy doesn't exist other than as a means for destroying democracy based on Human Rights.





.

No comments: