Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Turkey's PM Erdogan: Israel is a terrorist state! Klevius: Islam is a terrorist religion!


Acknowledgement: The poetic basis for Klevius epistemological world is, as stated in Demand for Resources – on the right to be poor (1992:21-22,38) the inescapable rationality of the surrounding nature/universe mirrored in the limits imposed on us by our existence-centrism (see Origin of Universe). However, this uncertainty is what makes life worth of living. Without it we would be all-knowing "gods" and bored to death. Why do you think football (real football - not American handball) is the world's most popular sport? Because no one will ever master a round ball moving between players who try their best to cheat each other while no hands are allowed! No wonder that this the world's trickiest game for so long has been considered taboo for girls/women.


The danger of truth


The name of this blog is so disturbing that it has become heavily filtered by islamofascists and their supporters. However, the simple truth is that the name is precisely what you end up with when you mirror islam and its history against Human Rights!







The problem with islam is its own evilness - this is why OIC wants us to shut up 


To really comprehend the level of confused fanaticism combined with low intellectual standard that signify muslim terrorists, consider the following reference to Koran and statements by Muhammad Badie, the "Supreme Guide" of the Muslim Brotherhood: Obey Allah's commandment to wage jihad for His sake with [their] money and [their] lives, so that Allah's word will reign supreme and the infidels' word will be inferior. The Jews have dominated the land, spread corruption on earth, spilled the blood of believers and in their actions profaned holy places, including their own." As such, he demanded that the Arab world reject negotiations with Israel in favor of "holy Jihad”.

Are Hamas muslims belonging to peaceful non-islam or original evil islam? 


Hama's charter: Israel will exist and will continue to exist until islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it. The Day of Judgment will not come about until muslims fight/kills the Jews.

Klevius comment: According to OIC, Erdogan etc, there's only one islam and it's a crime to criticize islam. That would mean criticizing Hamas reference to islam and muslims in their charter is either a crime or Hamas aren't muslims and do not represent islam.Tell that to Palestinians, will you!















Klevius view on Israel: The end of the Jewish Diaspora in the form of the releasing key to the curse of Canaan. When the Khazar (and other) Jews got a bad reputation because of their extensive trading in white slave girls and eventually were persecuted* and driven out of Russia, those who ended up in non-Russian Europe became secularized and later, came to constitute the basis for an almost secular and democratic modern state based on technology in the midst and misery of where it all started. Where the Saudis turned from slave driven plantation wealth to oil wealth, the bulk of modern Israelites really produced something by themselves.
* Although the majority of Jews didn't inherit this wealth built up by slave trading their "Jewishness" became a negative and stigmatizing label, reinforced during harsh times and the existence of Jewish "capitalists".

Klevius tutorial on Jews, Judaism and Israel - and the origin of islam

(based on the Jewish Encyclopedia and Klevius IQ - please do note that the excerpts are made by biased Jews)

Why rapetivism and slave finance have constituted the back bone of Judaism and islam


From circumcised Jews to Vagina Jews and Penis muslims - all kept together with rapetivism and slave finance

You're lucky, dear reader, to still have the possibility to be informed by Klevius who happens to be the world's best informed "expert" on sex segregation (yes, it's truly sad that the competition is almost nil - Bourdieu's cautious take on the subject was anyway miserably entangled in Marxism etc).
















It all started with the racist and sexist idea about the world's only true “god” who had chosen the Jews as its blessed people. That leaves little else for the rest of mankind except jealousy or contempt. If you're not a racist then you can't possibly respect racism, can you.

The curse of sexist sex apartheid and slavery racism


They fight in Mideast as they always have.

Ever thought about why there never emerged other "monotheisms" in the world? Only the Jewish one and its derivatives. "Monotheism" wasn't and isn't the rule nor is it, as some racist supremacists like to put it, "the latest stage of civilization". Quite the contrary. Something special happened in the Mideast and it was certainly not "god". And as Klevius has repeatedly pointed out it's about institutionalized sex apartheid (sex slavery) in a way (the Bible etc) that wasn't necessary elsewhere. Neither Buddha (Nepal 563-483 BCE) nor Confucius (China 551–479 BCE) made any effort to blame sex segregation on a "god" conveniently out of reach for others to scrutinize. Nor can you find it anywhere else on the planet. Klevius has also pointed to the strange fact that only semitic (and later, not original, Indo-European) languages have the curious separation of the sexes in third person pronouns (well, it was easy for Klevius who masters Finnish where you simply use 'hän' instead of the stupid Swedish 'han'/'hon' or English 'he'/'she' segregation). The rest of the world has shown that you can not only survive but even gain from dropping this linguistic anomaly.


The curse of sex segregation


 
Canaan was the first of the seven sinners who made idols for the heathens, the other six being Phut, Shelah, Nimrod, Elah, Diul, and Shuah. Canaan, with his six companions, brought precious stones from Havilah (Gen. ii. 11-12), and made of them idols, which at night shone as brightly as the sun, and which were endowed with a power so magical that, when the blind Ammorites kissed them, they regained their eyesight ("Chronicles of Jerahmeel," p. 167; compare Kenaz).

Canaan, in a certain sense, was predestined to this and similar offenses; for he was begotten by his father while in Noah's Ark, whereas God had commanded that the sexes should live separately therein (Gen. R. xxxvi.).

Klevius comment: The mythological Ark wasn't out at sea for longer than 150 days, which fact the mythological all-knowing “god” who ordered the project must have been aware of. Therefore the segregation of the sexes cannot have been imposed because of fear of too many passengers. So why? This, of course, reflects not only a general pattern of sex apartheid but also reveals a particular and deeply perverted view on girls/women among those who created the story.

Concerning the curse of Noah upon Canaan, the Midrashim endeavored in different ways to give a solution to the question why Canaan had to suffer for the sins of his father. The old explanation was that Canaan, not Ham, though he had in no sense transgressed against his grandfather, had to be cursed by him because God had blessed Noah and his sons; and wherever the blessing of God rests there can be no curse (R. Judah, Gen. R. l.c.; Justin Martyr, "Dial. cum Tryph." cxxxix.). This explanation, however, was found to be defective; for it was contrary to Jewish sentiment to curse an innocent man; hence the new assertion that Canaan, like his father, transgressed against Noah.

Canaan the father of slaves - and slave masters

Through the curse which Canaan brought upon himself, the low condition of slaves (Canaan's descendants) is to be explained; for parents exercise a strong influence, for good or for evil, upon the fate of their offspring. "Wo unto the sinners," comments a Midrash, "who bring evil upon themselves, their children, their children's children; in fact, upon all the generations that follow."

Klevius comment: This was the key for "the chosen people" to exploit the cursed.

Many of the sons of Canaan were worthy of being ordained as rabbis; but the guilt of their father barred them from such a career (Yoma 87a). God, however, is different from man. Man seeks to deprive his enemies of the means of subsistence; but God, though He cursed Canaan, made him a slave, that he might eat and drink of that which his master possessed (ib. 75a).

Klevius comment: In short, the backbone of Jewish history ever since is that of slave trading. This was what made Jews in the Diaspora rich and influential. And this was the secret behind the "peaceful co-existence" in Al-Andalusia's "Golden Age" and elsewhere.

Also consider the Origin of the Vikings.


From the Jewish Vagina via Jews believing in Jesus (not Christ) to the muslim Penis, i.e. the origin of islam


Matrilineality in Judaism is the view that people born of a Jewish mother are themselves Jewish. The Torah does not explicitly discuss the conferring of Jewish status through matrilineality, and in apparent contrast to this position, the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) provides many examples of Israelite men whose children through foreign women appear to have been accepted as Israelite.
Klevius comment: As described by Klevius about the kinship atom, matrilineality via one's sister is the basic form of identifying ones biokin relation. You and your sister both came from the same controlled Vagina. So if your sister has a daughter/grand-daughter who marries your son/grand-son you can be 100% sure their children are directly related, via an unbroken chain of Vaginas, to you. However, when the Jews started their disastrous "the chosen people" genocide policy they created Jews via the Penis/rapetivism so as to get as many Jewish soldier as possible, i.e. what islam much later re-introduced hence resulting in less than 10 Million Jews and more than 1,5 Billion muslims.

However, in Mishnah in the 2nd century CE there's a shift in Rabbinic Judaism from patrilineal to matrilineal descent.

Klevius comment:This was to distinguish against Jews believing in Jesus or Christ. And because of this Christian Jews became  Christians in terminology.

In the Hellenistic period of the 4th Century BCE – 1st Century CE some evidence indicates that the offspring of intermarriages between Jewish men and non-Jewish women were considered Jewish.

Klevius comment:  After Alexander the Great many Jews learned Greek and moved out. This laid the basis for the Jewish civil wars etc.
 
Philo of Alexandria calls the child of a Jew and a non-Jew a nothos (bastard), regardless of whether the non-Jewish parent is the father or the mother.

Klevius comment: This is a more than usually stupid Wikipedia sentence. Philo was a Diaspora Jew (Hellenistic Jew) and supported matrileineality. Being a Jew means being a male Jew. The woman is only the reproducer.



Origin of islam and its desecration of Universal Human Rights 


According to Hugh Kennedy, professor of Arabic language and Arabic history,"before Abd al-Malik, caliph 685-705, Mohammed, who allegedly died 632,  is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever...", and according to Klevius, one has to differ between the evil plundering, enslavement and rapetivism in the vacuum after the Romans, and its “moral” institutionalization – by blaiming Allah – a couple of generations later under Malik.

Initially islam (or what came to be islam) grew out of the formula:
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+apostasy ban

This, together with the poor, illiterate Arab Bedouins, steered by Jewish Christian leaders (and their conspiracies) through the old trade routes in a robbing, pillaging and raping campaign, is the only explanation to the sudden "success" of what later became institutionalized as Kora/islam. And what was "successful" on the Arabian peninsula of course worked equally well in North Africa and elsewhere. And the further they went the more women and soldiers etc submitted to the formula. By force, greed or whatever. Those who didn't were slaughtered.

Islam now expands by the help of oil money and the protection from those very Human Rights its top organization (the muslim world Caliphate) OIC has abandoned and replaced with its pompous racist and sexist Sharia (the so called Cairo declaration). 

Today the most intolerant country in the world, Saudi Arabia, is the “guardian of islam” while Indonesia, the world's most populous muslim nation, like many other muslimized/islamized places, doesn't allow its citizen not to believe in “god”, i.e. no freedom FROM religion.

So called “extremist” muslims* (Sharia muslims, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood, Salafists/Wahhabists, Hizbut Tahrir etc etc) know that islam is dead without fundamentalism, i.e. those very original racist/sexist pillars that attracted in the first place. And who is, by non-muslims or secular muslims, considered “extremist muslims” inevitably changes all the time in accordance with their growing understanding of what is the original true islam and the impossibility of trying to mutilate it.

* Interestingly, those who call themselves non-fundamentalists but defend a "god-moral" also defend the continuous change in interpretation of this "the only god's moral" due to societal changes. I.e. precisely as the so called man made law, except that they can still keep up senseless ordinations by referring to a "god" that can't be questioned about it.

Just some years ago most “Westerners” considered demand for Sharia (i.e. the abandoning of Universal Human Rights) extreme. Today most understand that there is no real islam without Sharia. This is how islam's inborn evil has survived after long latent periods of inactivity due to its own impotency. Parasitism needs nutrition from outside itself.

Israel is a Westernized country mostly populated with Westerners who call themselves, due to tradition, Jews but are not (just like most Christians). Because of this Israel is the most developed nation in a sea of islamic misery or oil induced wealth or Western welfare aid.


Intellectual or physical (or both) warfare is the inevitable product of “monotheisms”


And the only reason why the enormous mass of non-believers isn't recognized is because they aren't organized under a “god”.




Time-line 


Klevius comment:

The people chosen by the world's only god 


Circumcision 


The slaughter of the Canaanites 


Slave finance based on religion becoming the backbone of Judaic finance 


Hellenization and the war(s) between Jews 


Mishnah and Thalmud  - the separation of orthodox Jews and Christian/Jesus Jews


Crimean Khanate - just one example


For a long time, until the early 18th century, the khanate maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East. In a process called the "harvesting of the steppe", they enslaved Slavic peasants.

Klevius comment: Mainly white girls who were valued highest on the slave market (see Origin of the Vikings).

Antisemitism because of slave finance 


The disintegration of the Ottoman slave empire due to West's abolishment of slavery 


Jews fleeing Russia for Europe 


European (re)antisemitism – now fueled by history and the wealth/power of some Jews 


Holocaust 


Israel 


A practically dead islam revitalized by oil demand from Western technology


OIC, modern islamofascism 




Sayeeda Warsi, UK's leading Human Rightsophobe, is now degraded (or upgraded) to "Minister of Faith" but continues her eager work for Sharia and islamofascism.























 .







.


.

No comments: