Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Human Rights vs Abu Qatada/islam


Deal with the Devil and you'll be burned - even if you call him "peaceful"!


As Klevius has long ago pointed out there is a chain of dangerous Sharia supporting (OIC) and Human Rights hating (deliberately or just due to stupidity) UK women strategically positioned in the midst of a net work consisting of Saudi Arabia, EU, UN/OIC, and BBC.


1 Kate Rudd, the British Consul General in Jeddah, started her diplomatic career as head of the UK Trade and Investment delegation to Iraq and her questionable position has only deepened as the delegation’s representative to OIC.


2 European Union's high representative for foreign affairs, Catherine Ashton (see text below).
 
3 Muslim Sayeeda Warsi ('Minister for Faith islam' – is at the Foreign Office and includes being the lead minister responsible for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Central Asia, the UN, the International Criminal Court and OIC, which is the largest multi-lateral organisation in the world after the UN)

4 Mehmuda Mian, fanatic (see below) muslim BBC trustee etc


Astonishingly, the European Union's high representative for foreign affairs, Catherine Ashton, has also issued a joint statement with the secretaries general of the OIC and the Arab League that "condemn[s] any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to hostility and violence. While fully recognizing freedom of expression, we believe in the importance of respecting all prophets (read Mohammed)" The statement will be understood by many as EU approval of the OIC position that disrespecting any prophet (read Mohammed) is tantamount to advocacy of religious hatred and should be prohibited by states that have ratified the ICCPR



Why not send islam back instead of Abu Qatada?!


It's much easier to be on the side of islamofascism (or blink it) than to defend Human Rights because islam uses group terror against individuals (on the streets as well as in the UN etc).

According to Human Rights, Abu Qatada shouldn't be handed over to islamofascists although he himself is an islamofascist. However, because he supports an evil ideology that is against Human Rights (Koran, Sharia, Mohammed, OIC/Cairo declaration) he is a criminal.

Klevius important statement to ignorant readers:

1) Islam is really the worst ideological crime ever against humanity. The totally incomprehensible amount of suffering, murder and genocides not only caused by and made possible by but also "defended" by Koranic ideology throughout more than a Millennium by far exceeds the numbers of any other ideologically underpinned crimes.

2) Today islam and muslims are represented by OIC which, by gathering a voting bloc mainly based on countries with the worst Human Rights records, has managed not only to become the most powerful force in UN (which was created for the purpose of keeping such evil forces at bay) but also to completely step aside of any Human Rights obligation that doesn't fit their evil agenda (Sharia in the form of the Cairo declaration). Moreover, via the treacherous "islamophobia"/religious "tolerance" (totalitarian Sharia islam has nothing to do with religion in its conventional meaning) Saudi based OIC is successfully criminalizing criticism against the worst crime ever as "religious hatred" and "blasphemy".


Islamofascism at the heart of BBC

Although BBC's support for islamofascism/Sharia is mind blowing for a critical and informed ear/eye, ordinary people are almost completely unaware of the depth of BBC's deception although information is freely available. This is because of BBC's sly and almost sophisticated jihad against its stated policy:

"We (BBC) must not knowingly and materially mislead our audiences with our content."

However, this aim is continuously and seriously violated by BBC. Just think about one example, i.e. that Klevius information about OIC (all muslim's world organization) in accuracy and content easily outperforms the world's biggest news broadcaster (see Klevius beats BBC when it comes to true reporting about OIC!).

BBC is not firstly an organization for its audience but a political tool for supporting and protecting Saudi steered islamofascism for the purpose of gaining political and financial access to Mideastern oil money.
This has gone so far so BBC will expand its compulsory fee to also cover Arabic broadcasting in Mideast etc.



 Mehmuda Mian, muslim BBC trustee and commissioner of the Independent Police Complaints Commission clearly sides for Sharia and therefore against Human Rights: “Being a muslim is the bedrock of my existence. Islam is about peace and justice, though unfortunately some of those precepts have been taken over and there are some very odd views as to what Islam means".


obu-investigators.com (2005): Mehmuda Mian Pritchard is the commissioner at the IPCC responsible for the National Crime Squad. She worked for the PCA, the discredited Police Complaints Authority, before the organisation renamed itself to the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission). It is our view, that the IPCC is just a Home Office expediency, all commissioners and key personnel being appointed by the Home Office.

In 2010, Gita Sahgal, a human rights activist and writer, was forced to leave Amnesty International because of the organization's continuing support for the muslim jihadist Moazzam Begg and his islamofascist organization, Cage Prisoners. According to Sahgal, Begg was "Britain's most famous supporter of the Taliban".

Government, non-profit groups and much of the media consider truly secular muslims to be an anomaly; and that by embracing the enlightened muslim voice, opinion-makers fear alienating vast sections of the general muslim population.






 .

No comments: