Why has BBC been so uninterested in child sexual abuse committed by muslim pedophiles/sex offenders? Could BBC's own Sir pedophile/sex offender Savile give a hint?
In an effort to distract attention from itself BBC now uses its airtime (paid by compulsory fees/taxes from every Brit no matter they like or hate BBC) to libel parents with deeply misleading stats. Just as in the heydays of incest hysteria that ended up in the notorious Cleveland scandal in the 1980's when a state trained "expert" stole over hundred children from their innocent parents just because the reflex/response to the "expert's" finger in the anus of the poor children happened to indicate "incest" according to a psycho-hoax in fashion at the time.
As Klevius happens to be the only one who has critically scrutinized stats about child sexual abuse stats and their usage, please educate yourself below.
Sir pedophile/sex offender Jimmy Savile, "Friend of all"
Longterm BBC celebrity and pedophile/sex offender Sir Jim Savile and his friend prince Charles.
And here with England's worst serial sex murderer Peter Sutcliffe (to the left)
Britain's worst serial sex murderer/offender Sutcliffe: "Savile visited a lot"
Sutcliffe murdered his third victim, Irene Richardson, mere yards from Savile’s flat in Roundhay, Leeds, in 1977
Detective John Stainthorpe, who worked for the West Yorkshire force for more than 40 years: "When the Ripper was really active one of the suspects put forward by members of the public was Jimmy Savile".
Andy Dawson: In a tape that has been leaked to a The Sun, Sutcliffe waxes lyrical about the bandy-legged child-bothering bastard, saying: "I can’t fault him from my experiences of what he was like. I don’t care what these people who are coming out of the woodwork are saying."
Yeah, to be fair pal, you probably can’t fault him because you’re a hairy, overweight, psychologically-broken killer and not the kind of vulnerable, star-struck 13-year-old girl that Savile was more into.
This is from a man who savaged more than a dozen living, breathing women – women who were unable to hit back against him. It’s hard to decide what is more deranged – his views, or the fact that they’re deemed worthy of being aired in the public domain.
Klevius comment: Despite his extensive interest in children Sir BBC "friend of all" Savile, didn't manage to father any himself. It's a little bit like the social state (as described in Angels of Antichrist) which has an extensive interest in children but constantly ends up abusing them.
Unbiased research confirms that the worst threat to children is the social state - not the parents
Klevius 'Ekot om Incest' (The Echo of Incest) is the only existing honest and unbiased research on the research about incest prevalence. Why is that? Simply because most such research used to be made for the purpose of shaming parents as
For English speakers please read Angels of Antichrist the most important sociological paper from the last Century.
Any sort of as sexual experienced situation among children in bio-families had a prevalence of less than 0,07% based on Klevius reading of Sariola whereas an American study (Russel) managed to propose 67% by stretching and including all family relations (including step fathers) and also including offenders who were children themselves. But the sky high numbers in this latter report used to be happily referred to as "proof" about the dangerous parents, and constantly giving the impression that it was about bio-parents*.
Klevius research departed from a Swedish news program (Ekot) which during 18 programs threw suspicion against normal families in an effort to justify the enormous sum that taxpayers contributed to the Swedish social state. And due to this and previous state propaganda an unknown number of innocent bio-parents were jailed and the children placed in state institutions were their lives were usually destroyed at an early age and at a cost beyond belief.
* in Klevius work as a solicitor and researcher dealing with these kind of social state cases a repeated pattern was accused parents who asked: "Why me, why not the crazy neighbor parent"? This sort of reaction combined with an unfounded trust in the social state clearly paves the way for a huge amount of horrifying atrocities committed under the flag "in the best interest of the child" (i.e. in the best interest of the state bureaucracy and its commercial allies). Carefully read Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship and Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis combined with Klevius psychosocial Freud time-line and you will never be naive about the social state again).