Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Sex abuse (i.e. Sharia) supporting BBC (Savile & Co) takes side with the social state and false stats

Why has BBC been so uninterested in child sexual abuse committed by muslim pedophiles/sex offenders? Could BBC's own Sir pedophile/sex offender Savile give a hint?


In an effort to distract attention from itself BBC now uses its airtime (paid by compulsory fees/taxes from every Brit no matter they like or hate BBC) to libel parents with deeply misleading stats. Just as in the heydays of incest hysteria that ended up in the notorious Cleveland scandal in the 1980's when a state trained "expert" stole over hundred children from their innocent parents just because the reflex/response to the "expert's" finger in the anus of the poor children happened to indicate "incest" according to a psycho-hoax in fashion at the time.

As Klevius happens to be the only one who has critically scrutinized stats about child sexual abuse stats and their usage, please educate yourself below.
 .


Sir pedophile/sex offender Jimmy Savile, "Friend of all"


Longterm BBC celebrity and pedophile/sex offender Sir Jim Savile and his friend prince Charles.


.

.








And here with England's worst serial sex murderer Peter Sutcliffe (to the left)


Britain's worst serial sex murderer/offender Sutcliffe: "Savile visited a lot"


Sutcliffe murdered his third victim, Irene Richardson, mere yards from Savile’s flat in Roundhay, Leeds, in 1977

Detective John Stainthorpe, who worked for the West Yorkshire force for more than 40 years: "When the Ripper was really active one of the suspects put forward by members of the public was Jimmy Savile".


Andy Dawson: In a tape that has been leaked to a The Sun, Sutcliffe waxes lyrical about the bandy-legged child-bothering bastard, saying: "I can’t fault him from my experiences of what he was like. I don’t care what these people who are coming out of the woodwork are saying."

Yeah, to be fair pal, you probably can’t fault him because you’re a hairy, overweight, psychologically-broken killer and not the kind of vulnerable, star-struck 13-year-old girl that Savile was more into.

This is from a man who savaged more than a dozen living, breathing women – women who were unable to hit back against him. It’s hard to decide what is more deranged – his views, or the fact that they’re deemed worthy of being aired in the public domain.


Klevius comment: Despite his extensive interest in children Sir BBC "friend of all" Savile, didn't manage to father any himself. It's a little bit like the social state (as described in Angels of Antichrist) which has an extensive interest in children but constantly ends up abusing them.


Unbiased research confirms that the worst threat to children is the social state - not the parents


Klevius 'Ekot om Incest' (The Echo of Incest) is the only existing honest and unbiased research on the research about incest prevalence. Why is that? Simply because most such research used to be made for the purpose of shaming parents as possible likely offenders although the truth is that bio-parents (at least in the West) were the least likely culprits. A notable exception was the Finnish researcher Pentti Sariola who, in the late 1980's, made the most extensive and non-biased mapping of prevalence of sexual abuse reported by 15-16 year olds (see table below).

For English speakers please read Angels of Antichrist the most important sociological paper from the last Century.







.





























Any sort of as sexual experienced situation among children in bio-families had a prevalence of less than 0,07% based on Klevius reading of Sariola whereas an American study (Russel) managed to propose 67% by stretching and including all family relations (including step fathers) and also including offenders who were children themselves. But the sky high numbers in this latter report used to be happily referred to as "proof" about the dangerous parents, and constantly giving the impression that it was about bio-parents*.

Klevius research departed from a Swedish news program (Ekot) which during 18 programs threw suspicion against normal families in an effort to justify the enormous sum that taxpayers contributed to the Swedish social state. And due to this and previous state propaganda an unknown number of innocent bio-parents were jailed and the children placed in state institutions were their lives were usually destroyed at an early age and at a cost beyond belief.

* in Klevius work as a solicitor and researcher dealing with these kind of social state cases a repeated pattern was accused parents who asked: "Why me, why not the crazy neighbor parent"? This sort of reaction combined with an unfounded trust in the social state clearly paves the way for a huge amount of horrifying atrocities committed under the flag "in the best interest of the child" (i.e. in the best interest of the state bureaucracy and its commercial allies). Carefully read Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship and Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis combined with Klevius psychosocial Freud time-line and you will never be naive about the social state again). 







 .






No comments: