Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
"Pathological symbiosis" between state & "faith": Sweden puts the definite stop for homeschooling & instead offers psycho school & islam curriculum!
1 psycholization (although psychology is an impossible science our kids have become its most popular guinea pigs & the school its main laboratory - and we pay for it!)
2 statelization (while attachment to parents are crushed poor peer relations are thriving & the curriculum is filled with non sense at best & state/faith propaganda at worst).
3 sexualization (many schools, in fact, function as brothels where the boys are supplied with sex while the girls think it's a necessary deal to get through the sex apartheid barrier). Comes handy for islamic jihadist schooled boys!
Recommended essential Klevius reading before you continue:
Where the Law Ends the Tyranny Begins 1993 (only available in Swedish)
Children & the Arbitrariness of Authorities 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Daughters of the Social State 1994 (only available in Swedish)
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state 1996. The most important sociology paper written in the last century? What do YOU think, dude? Think!
"Pathological Symbiosis" in LVU - Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence 2004. Apart from being possibly the only good scientific work on the origin of the concept also an astonishing example of how democracy is sidestepped by state bureaucracy.
From Freud to bin Laden 2004
Klevius Psychosocial Freud Timeline 2004
What is Sex Segregation & feminism, really? 2004
Islamic globalization - Saudi Abdullah & Co behind the spread of racist/sexist islamic hate mongering around the globe!
Klevius Sweden report: Background to the proposal that will definitely stop free homeschooling in Sweden.
When racist muslim school aged youth attack cemetary staff, visitors & graves,it reflects not "homeschooled" racism but madrassa & imam schooled "infidel" racism rooted in the evil Origin of islam.
Sweden has made a pact with Satan, um, Saudi finanzed islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) which means that islam is now expanding in the Swedish curriculum while homeschooling is forbidden. Already now non-muslim Swedish students have to "learn" abt islam via hypocritical imam lies sponsored by Saudi Arabia, starve during Ramadan, be raped & bullied as "infidels" via child/youth jihadists etc. This happens while Saudi Arabia (together with 56 other islamist countries), the most intolerant country in the world, works hard via UN to criminalize the truth abt islam. continues.
In 1723 Swedish parents were stipulated to teach their kids reading. In 1842 school attendance became obligatory although it was still possible to homeschool if the authorities (the church) checked it up. In 1924 Sweden got its first social (welfare) state law accessing all children. One of its consequences was that Astrid Lindgren (world famous author of Pippi Longstocking etc children's books) as a pregnant 18 year old single mother had to escape to Denmark for not loosing her child ( see e.g. Klevius' Angels of Antichrist, possibly the most important sociological paper from the last century - judge for yourself. However, due to its lack of Mideastern monotheist ideology, its criticism of sex segregation, its criticism of much psykology/psychiatry & its criticism of feminism, few can survive its reading without suffering dimming brain rage).
Few modern schools are capable of educating children without the assistance of homeschoolers
The school system of today already rests on partial homeschooling. Behind almost every successful student there is a supporting home where the crucial teaching and support occur.
Myths & facts abt homeschooling
Homeschooling is often accused for the loss of social interaction with peers. However, peer interaction may well be more of a problem than an asset’ simply because peers are in general equally immature. Peer-oriented children are also often more difficult to parent and teach. and often fail to integrate into society. At least while they are young. It's a troublesome fact that most criminality in Sweden is performed by children/youth. Moreover, when occasionally some of them are caught by the police (after often costly chases) nothing can be done because of their age. This catch 22 is pure child neglect from the side of the social state.
Modern school evolved from a need to basic reading/writing to an institution where to keep the kids while the parents worked. Soon it became obvious that the state could use this splendid opportunity for brainwashing the kids. It\s important to distinguish between a healthy and human attachment to the surrounding society, and the indoctrination of religious or political views.
The center for peer orientation is now the school and the street, while the teachers are hiding.
Pathological symbiosis vs attachment
The most common argument against homeschooling is, in fact, its most convincing defense. Homeschooled children are usually (on a US scale up to 83% compared to 23%) more mature, more socially adept, and better prepared for higher education.
No wonder homeschooled students are allegedly favored applicants of many universities. Homeschooling may hence be seen as the balancing cure to the lack of healthy parental attachment, and as a protection against unhealthy peer attachment.
However, as shown by Peter Klevius in his thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” the Swedish “social state” has managed to keep its dirty foster child trafficking outside the scope of the European Human Riughts Convention by hiding under the legal term “margin of appreciation” (see Klevius’ Angels of Antichrist 1996 & Pathological Symbiosis 2004).
Although the Swedish state now (again*) wants to use the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as an excuse for completely denying the rights of homeschoolers, the text in the Swedish child abduction, um, protection act LVU (Act Containing Special Regulations Concerning the Care of Young Persons) – now including the term “pathological symbiosis” – stays in an obvious opposition to the view expressed in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (see Klevius Pathological Symbiosis).
* As I described in Angels of Antichrist (1996) the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was a creation of mostly socialist Swedish women who had set up the "Save the Children" organization a few years before the world's first general child protection law in 1924.
“Pathological Symbiosis” is, as already the name implies, an oxymoron. A “pathological symbiosis” is per definition parasitic, i.e. the very opposite to symbiosis. In the thesis “Pathological Symbiosis” Klevius has, as possibly the first ever, carefully traced not only the dim roots of this peculiar term but also its murky adaptation and implementation as a handy tool for robbing children. In fact, “pathological symbiosis” is a smear campaign against parental attachment, and in Sweden frequently used as a last resort for kidnapping children from parents (usually a mother) who the (usually female) welfare officer happenms to dislike (or if she has a standing order for such a child / remember that most child abductions in Sweden used to be targeting nice and unproblematic kids, i.e. what is termed on subjective grounds (see e.g. Hessle’s 1997 comparison Japan-Sweden).
Research on homeschooling reveals a number of strengths.
The cultivation and preservation of the child-parent attachment leads to considerably less delingquncy and youth criminality (Sweden has among the worst child criminality paired with perhaps the worst & most costly public school compared to e.g. their neighbour Finland which used to be in the educational top with Japan which, in turn, use to have the lowest child/youth criminality & one of the cheapest school systems). By the stealthy introduction of murky child “protection” criterions such as, for example, ”pathological symbiosis” the social state effectively contradicts the best interest of the child, by eroding parent-child attachment, not only among those targeted by the social authorities but also in general because of the widespread attitude that follows and makes parents even more reluctant to take responsibility for their kids.
A healthy attachment to the surrounding society
Parental attachment has since long been known as the most significant protector against criminality and destructive behavior.
It may also be noted that it’s pure and unfounded Utopian naivity to assume that a fictitious “soul” of the nation or society can be dictated via the schools. Life is inevitably moving and that’s the whole meaning of living . That’s why the world’s most popular toy is round (sorry American “football” and rugby fans). Attachment is the primary mechanism of cultural transmission. This is why segregation is so dangerous, no matter if it is Islamic ghettos or street gangs.
It’s a well known fact that almost all homeschooled chidren are openminded and kind towards other. To an extent that representatives for the totalitarian social state machinery actually proposes this as a weakness because the homeschooled children have to face the unhealthy children the school system has created.
Individuation- a psychological/psychiatric confusion
As shown/discussed by Klevius (1981, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2004 etc) the so called individuation process has in child psychiatry been made upside down. The baby human ought to be seen as what it is, namely an extremely egoistic individual who then, hopefully, gets rid of its state of individuation by learning to attach with others. The baby suckling the mother is a symbiotic relation between two individuals who have extremely little in common.
Unsupervised attachments to peers undermines the development of empathy. This may be beneficial from a cold business perspective but less so from a human point of view. The womb for human warmth is to be found at home, and it doesn’t have to be even female. Only an individual who is fully attached with society can perform a truly democratic opinion based on the idea of Negative Human Rights.
The Swedish proposal to definitely ban homeschooling
As noted in Angels of Antichrist 1996 the Swedish compulsory school attendancy (instead of compulsory education) already hinders most homeschooling efforts, and effectively gathers the Swedish kids into a trap for almost random abduction.
According to the proposal the possibility to fullfil compulsory school attendancy in some other way remains. This is clearly not true because "religious and philosophical reasons" are now no longer accepted. This is, however, well in line with the ECHR decision Konrad & others vs Germany, which many, including the homeschool organization ROHUS seem to have missed completely. This despite information given to their "judicial expert" by Klevius both in writing and orally!?
Apart from this it's also proposed that instead of the previous writing "special reasons" ("sarskilda skal") it should now be "extraordinarely reasons" ("synnerliga skal"). Moreover, this possibility should, according to the proposal, be used "very restrictivly".
Konrad & others vs Germany
"The Court observes in this respect that there appears to be no
consensus among the Contracting States with regard to compulsory
attendance of primary schools. While some countries permit home
education, other States provide for compulsory attendance of its State or
private schools.. In the present case, the Court notes that the German authorities and courts have carefully reasoned their decisions and mainly stressed the fact
that not only the acquisition of knowledge, but also the integration into and
first experience with society are important goals in primary school
education. The German courts found that those objectives cannot be equally
met by home education even if it allowed children to acquire the same
standard of knowledge as provided for by primary school education..
The Court considers this presumption as not being erroneous and as falling
within the Contracting States' margin of appreciation which they enjoy in
setting up and interpreting rules for their education systems."
Klevius comment: It is within this "margin of appreciation" racist, sexist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, anti human rights islam will thrive together with social state fascism (compare the Swedish LVU child "protection" act), while Negative Human Rights of the individual are squeezed away!