Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Klevius vs Obama in Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test

Dear reader, check out for yourself if you think these proposed answers from Obama are in accordance with what he himself has said/acted! If not, pls let me know & I'll change them.

What's the difference between Peter Klevius & Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) according to Lorna Saltzman’s islamophobe test?

1 Do you favor equal rights and treatment of women and men?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

2 Do you oppose stoning of women accused of adultery?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

3 Do you favor mandatory education of girls everywhere?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

4 Do you oppose slavery and child prostitution?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

5 Do you support complete freedom of expression and the press?
No, because I hate stupid people who criticize islam

6 Do you support the right of an individual to worship in her chosen religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): A tricky one. I was born to a muslim father & adopted by another muslim, & I haven’t committed open apostasy as yet neither have I admitted being technically a muslim in accordance with that very same islam I do respect.

7 Do you oppose government- and mosque-supported anti-Semitic publications, radio, TV and textbooks?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

8 Do you oppose the wearing of burqas in public places, schools and courts?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No

9 Do you oppose segregation of the sexes in public places and houses of worship?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, because I respect islam.

10 Do you oppose the death penalty for non-Muslims and Muslims who convert to another religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

11 Do you oppose “honor” killings?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

12 Do you oppose female genital mutilation?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I love Indonesia.

13 Do you oppose forced sexual relations?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

14 Do you oppose discrimination against homosexuals?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Just a little.

15 Do you support the right to criticize religion?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & hate islamophobes.

16 Do you oppose polygamy?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam.

17 Do you oppose child marriage, forced or otherwise?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Yes

18 Do you oppose the quranic mandate to kill non-Muslims and apostates?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): This is a misinterpretation of the holy Koran. In classical Arabic (i.e. when the Arabs, as the last people on the peninsula, learned to write) it simply means that you should kill unclean dogs & pigs!

19 Do you oppose the addition of sharia courts to your country’s legal system?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): No, I respect islam & Ingrid Matson.

20 Do you disagree with the quran which asserts the superiority of Islam to all other religions?
Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever): Not at all! Islam IS all religions!

In conclusion Mr X “president” Barry Barack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) scored well in line with his islamic roots, although not at all in line with the U.S. Constitution!

Peter Klevius, on the other hand, miserably failed this test as a 100% islamophobe.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Explicit cursing and lies have no basis in truth to one of the beliefs in the world for more than a billion Muslims