Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Evil islamic slave trade/raids to India spread much like the plague

Klevius IQ turbocharged history lesson on the origin of India's islamization

As you hopefully already know (by reading Klevius non-religious, non-biased & unsponsored analysis, e.g. Origin of islam, instead of relying on the extremely distorted picture served to you by supporters/representatives/naive collaborators of the worst crime ever against humanity!) the original ideology of islam is based on slavery/rapetivism/Sharia confinement/apostasy ban. The attraction of islam lays in sex segregation, i.e. Koran's sanctioning of (infidel)racism (meaning you can "morally" justify your immoral deeds), (rapetivism)sexism (up to four wives for the maximum reproduction of new muslims + as many infidel sex slaves you like or can "possess with your right hand").

Simply put, islam is built on male sex hunger (HSA*) & Koran/Sharia hinders girls/women from escaping it. Western Human Rights gives female human beings a free choice, & this is why islamic countries have come up with their Cairo declaration on "islamic human rights", now boosted by UN which was initially created for hindering precisely such kind of fascism! And Mr X US "president" (a born muslim who hasn't dared to either confirm he is a muslim or confirm his apostasy, hence being the true opposite to the US constitution of freedom) "respects" this evil "faith" & bows its evil hate mongering representatives. Remember, evilness doesn't become less evil just because so many support it. And also remember, islam can never be democratically elected precisely because islam is AGAINST democracy! And saying you are a racist when criticizing a half black man for his lies is just another angle of evil political correctness in the wake of Western oil money. Everything evil in islam is "translated" to something "positive" no matter if it's slavery, sex slave polygamy or infidel racism.

* HSA (male biased heterosexual attraction) heavily confuses women because it's often hard to distinguish from cultural sex segregation. As a consequence many women feel obliged to perform more heterosex than they would as truly free (emancipated) beings. They are trapped like those poor slaves who were gathered in Great Zimbabwe before they were transported to the muslim/Arabic Zwahili coast mosques (from A Roots Guide 2006)!

With the above in mind you may now consider how inherently parasitic islam came to utilize old trade routes for a purely parasitic Sharia finance based onj slave trade/raids. You may have been brainwashed to think that "because slavery was common all over the place Koranic/islamic slavery wasn't an issue to bother abt. But, in fact, the opposite is true. Koran sanctions slavery, slavery in the muslim world (the slave world) never stopped before it was forced to stop by Western Enlightenment & the idea of Negative Human Rights, islamic sex segregation is absolute & sees women/girls as sex slaves confined within Sharia & apostasy ban with no right of their own to choose a non/muslim man or even to have normal contact with "infidel" men (down to such trivial things as handshaking etc). Muslim females are seen as belonging to a non/human species according to Koran/islam.

When early muslim Arab slave traders sat in their dows & let the wind transport them to Kerala, Ceylon etc. they initiated a grim parasitic alliance with powerful locals who then made slave business by catching & selling out their own (poor) people, or buying African slaves from the Swahili area etc. As a consequence of these practices the powerful Indians often converted to islam out of greed whereas the poor did it out of fear. As a result you got different castes of muslims while still having access to an endless amount of potential "infidel" slaves on the Indian sub continent (just like in Africa & elsewhere where islamic Sharia slave finance had spread). Because of the share size of India's population, islamic slave trading/rading there would be more than enough to render islam the title of the worst crime ever against humanity.

Quite the opposite to what you might have been taught the "Arabs" who created evil islam were extremely "primitive" compared to the surrounding civilizations. As Mohammed is alleged to have said: "The most unprofitable thing that eats up the wealth of a believer is building". This statement by the alleged founder of islam is in 100% agreement with Klevius analysis of islam as a purely parasitic ideology! So the PC agitation of "Arabs" as contributers to development is a double mistake. A thief with a jewellers collection ought not to be called a jeweller!

Unfortunately the eager finger pointing (boosted by an inferiority complex which was also caused by islam!) against West, true history research has been almost stalled in most universities & replaced with islam.

The rajputs were such muslim slave masters who combined it with violent military style slave raiding! It's striking how well the big & longlasting (until the Brits) Indian development crunch fits with the chronology of islam's enslavement of India. Just as in the case of Africa as Klevius has pointed out in the still unpublished A Roots Guide & partly on Klevius web pages/blogs.

In fact, many awful customs can be traced to islam, directly or indirectly, even the worst variants of the caste system!

BTW & speaking abt how evil islam abuses its opposite, i.e. Negative Human Rights, for its thugs & their jihadist deeds! During Ramadan islamic police in islamic countries use to arrest even more non/muslims than usually, whereas in Western democracies the Western police is asked not to arrest almost any muslim thugs during Ramadan, although they rarely do at other times either!


Anonymous said...

"The first rajputs were such muslim slave masters who combined it with violent military style slave raiding! "

I think you mean the Moghul dynasty of India, and are a bit confused with this bit of Indian history. The Rajputs were Hindu kings of north India who went to war with the invading muslims (moghuls)

klevux said...

No, I mean the Rajputs at the time immediately after the islamic invasion 711 but somehow got a "first" on the wrong place. Pls do elaborate on this if you can shade additional light on the issue.