Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, September 03, 2009
Most westernized muslims fear the true teachings in the Koran. They therefore try to distance themselves from the original true islam.
By defining the recognition of the by far worst* single** ideological crime throughout history as a "phobia" one simultaneously defines a majority of muslims as islamophobes, simply because of their "moderation" i.e. their distancing themselves from these basic & original Koranic tenets.
* Counted in suffering & deaths. Although the early illiterate jihadists (incl. Muhammed) weren't able to leave any reliable records abt their crimes, the surrounding civilizations did record their atrocities to some extent. Later on there is even more evidence for a movement (islam from 'silm', meaning compromise, or avoidance of conflict, i.e. what you usually do at gun point) that first violently & later culturally (& violently) sponged on others, mainly through slavery (incl sex slavery), i.e. the origin of islamic Sharia finance. The estimates of the costs of islam's slavery through 1400 yrs vary considerably but even the lowest ones are more than enough for legitimizing the award title above.
** "Islamic diversity" is, of course, also an oxymoron. Rape victims, victims of conventional slavery (due to the amount of slaves islam IS 'conventional' slavery) & those in racist dhimmitude under islamic Sharia, may express a variety of"diverse" reactions to their submission under islamic totalitarian fascism. However, islam's basic tenets are simplistic racist infidel despise (now in the form of calling them "islamophobes") & sexist rapetivism (treating females as a different & segregated species in line with sex slavery for the purpose of sexually satisfying muslim males & culturally satifying islam's need of more muslims).