Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Monday, August 03, 2009
Klevius introductionary comment: Believe it or not but before 2000 I did not in any sense racially profile blacks. I can admit tghat at a very young age I sometimes slipped to profiling some especially weird looking people but without any notice on their skin color. Later I just acknowledged the simple fact that people look different. I also lived in an assumption that classic racism was long since securely buried & that I could continue enjoying my rage against white racists in Mississippi Burning etc. Then suddenly I encountered pure black racism (often disguised as an inherited right to be hostile against people with light skin color in general)
Today I'm also forced to racially profile blacks simply because of their own eager profiling/segregation of themselves (& me). I realized that black racism (& in extension now all racism targeting "whites" incl. latino speaking Euro-American whites) is a cheap populist tool for politics. So when I occasionally meet blacks who aren't separatists it feels almost as a relief, although I simultaneously hear the feeble minded "uncle Tom" mumbles from the background. This racist/sexist segregational cancer is the fertile ground for evil racist/sexist islam spread by the world enemy no 1 the Saudi Abdullah & Co! You know the guy & the "faith" Mr X "president so eagerly & deeply respects & bows for.
The response by Harvard prof. Henry Gates at the sight of Crowley was both racist & an example of racial profiling. Unlike officer Crowley, Gates (& Mr X "president" - see below) had never received education abt racial profiling (BTW, how come I managed to avoid RP without such education?!). And Mr X "president's" instant backing of Gates without even knowing the facts is also a clear sign of racial profiling.
So when should the "black community" speak out against their own racial profiling?
Does prof. Gates fulfill the PC definition of an islamophob?!
Thomas E. R. Maguire: "In into Africa, the BBC/PBS six-part series Henry Louis Gates, Jr. reinforces many of the negative stereotypes of Africa and its diverse culture. This paper deals with the way that Henry Louis Gates, Jr. portrays Islam negatively in a manner similar to the traditional and modern manifestations of Orientalism. The camera films several veiled women walking down the street as Gates mentions that, “for 2,000 years Arab merchants have settled on this coast. You can see their influence everywhere. There seems to be a mosque on every street corner.” Soon after, he goes to meet with Sheikh Bedawi, “one of Lamu’s most venerable Islamic scholars.” During the conversation, Sheikh Bedawi, somewhat light-skinned but clearly African, claims that he is of pure Arab descent, tracing his ancestry to the prophet Mohammed. He also explains that he tries not to look badly upon those with African blood. His translator adds that Arab men used to take African women as concubines, which led to African people being considered inferior. Leaving Lamu by boat, Gates says, “whatever Sheikh Bedowi says, that supposedly pure Arabic blood has long been mixed with the blood of Black Africans.” In this first encounter with Islamic Africa, the image of Islam progresses from veiled women, mosques, and a Qu’ranic school to bigotry, concubines, and confused identity, neatly reaffirming the Islamic simulacrum."
Klevius comment: This sleazy style of writing is typical of (deliberately?) ignorant islam supporters' cover up of islam's atrocities. Read Origin of islam! In fact, the Swahili phenomenon constitutes perhaps the main body (together with the Indian subcontinent) of islam's monstrous ideologically based genocidal crimes!
Racism is always based on segregation & the worst isn't even mentioned in most islam criticism, namely sex segregation, the main topic of Klevius/KLEVUX sites/blogs, papers, books etc!